From the People who brought Humanity the Magna Carta, steam engine, gas turbine, steam catapult, angled deck carrier, Babbage Difference Engine, Concorde, Calculus, etc., etc., etc.. Not to mention the Beatles, Kinks, Deep Purple, Led Zeppelin, etc. Glad They're Our Ally. Respect from the USA

@darrylpeake518

Жыл бұрын

Dont forget Black Sabbath, Iron Maiden, MotorHead, Judas Priest etc lol

@scottwolf8633

Жыл бұрын

@@darrylpeake518 Amen.

@hb1338

Жыл бұрын

You forgot the two most important things of all - cricket, closely followed by rugby union.

@jonathanparry7824

Жыл бұрын

The brits invented everything lol

@scottwolf8633

Жыл бұрын

@@hb1338 I played American Football, High School level, WITH pads and only suffered a separated shoulder. A Friend played University level Rugby, and broke so many bones, I lost count. But Rugby parties were the bomb. Cricket, I'll never understand.

I'm biased of course but it never ceases to amaze me when I think of what our tiny island has achieved throughout history.

@kenboydart

Жыл бұрын

I’ve had that same thought very often , that from an American .

@peterlloyd8313

Жыл бұрын

I put it down to the Pub.A pint or two after work keeps us going.

@philipellis4530

Жыл бұрын

Yes by robbing everybody, the more you look into our history the worse it gets,

@thecentralscrutinizer1758

Жыл бұрын

I'd love to know where this 'tiny island' cliche begun. Britain is the ninth largest island in the world. It's also the 5rd largest country in term of population in Europe. If you don't count Turkey & Russia it's the third largest. Britain is a very large island.

@jde-jj1lu

Жыл бұрын

@@thecentralscrutinizer1758Small compared to other countries yet being at the forefront of things like tech/business and ofcourse for a country of its size having the territories it’s taken over and it’s impact on the world.

Just a small point the proposed name of King George VI is George 6th not 4th . (4th would be IV).

@lieutenantcliff

Жыл бұрын

You heard that too?

@elcastorgrande

Жыл бұрын

King George IV is cheap whiskey.

@jimwalsh8520

Жыл бұрын

@@elcastorgrande There is no Irish whiskey or Scottish whisky of that name.

@jimwalsh8520

Жыл бұрын

@@nigelcraig3949 There is no such thing as King George IV Whiskey! The micks do not make it! You must be a yank. Scotch is NOT NEVER Whiskey!! it is Whisky. Note the spelling. So I will discuss it when you stop insulting the Scotch Whisky industry

@ayrplanes

Жыл бұрын

I'm surprised he didn't say "King George Vie".

Everyone here in the UK is looking forwards to HMS Warspite the most.

UK tech is awesome! As an American, I'm very glad we are allies.

@thecentralscrutinizer1758

Жыл бұрын

Arguably the two biggest warmongers on the planet.

@chrisdean6700

Жыл бұрын

@@thecentralscrutinizer1758 Time to wake up Mr. Rip Van Winkle.

@thecentralscrutinizer1758

Жыл бұрын

@@chrisdean6700 Time to wake up? Oh the irony? Perhaps you can tell me why Prescott Bush was financing the Nazi war machine in the build-up to WW2 when war was inevitable. What were the mighty Bush dynasty doing arming the Germans to the teeth knowing they'd soon be attacking allied forces? That's just one of many examples pal. If you don't think the USA & Britain are tyrants you have your head so far up your arse you can taste your tonsils.

@PaulineTran-vc3zy

8 ай бұрын

yes UK and USA at its best no chinese or russian can compete most russia subs hide under icebergs as for chinese its a jokes!!!

@Nahbro-dn6ez

7 ай бұрын

@@thecentralscrutinizer1758 do you want warmongering?

It never ceases to amaze me, the shear tenacity of this small country at competing with world powers, We may not dominate the world like the old days, But old habits die hard !

The British have the greatest names for their naval vessels.

@andrewjackson3686

Жыл бұрын

My Dad served aboard The HMS Victorious

@ozgurbozkurt5945

Жыл бұрын

You don't like "george w bush"?

@johnwalsh7256

Жыл бұрын

@@ozgurbozkurt5945 how about a new FDR.

@andrewjackson3686

Жыл бұрын

I do think George W Bush isn't as a stirring name than say USS Nimitz but it's OK for the the U.S. I'm not a big fan of naming ships after people anyway I don't really get excited by HMS Queen Elizabeth

@benjaminsmith3364

Жыл бұрын

HMS Pickles... First vessel to relay Lord Admiral Nelson's victory to the Admiralty!

damn, the brits already have the best subs in the world now they're already building a better one.

@barracuda7018

Жыл бұрын

Best in the world? How did you come to the conclusion..This is bed time story for 3 year old.. The Electric boat in the US has transferred all the technology to British.. BEA Systems asked the Electric Boat for assistance when they faced big problems with Astute.. The US subs are the best by a long shot. Ohio class is the most advanced boomer, Sea wolf the most advanced hunter with capabilities classified.

@Outlaw3280

Жыл бұрын

@@barracuda7018 😂😂 you just on here trolling people. And wronging peoples comments your a delusional typical Nazi/yank.

@V.B.Squire

Жыл бұрын

Which means we can sell the old new ones to Ukraine I'm looking forward to that

@winstonchurchill586

Жыл бұрын

@@V.B.Squire how are we going to sell them to Ukraine? They’re nuclear powered with ballistic missiles Ukraine isn’t allowed that, we won’t even give them fighter jets never mind a Billion pound submarine.

@V.B.Squire

Жыл бұрын

@@winstonchurchill586 I didn't say they will, but I am saying they SHOULD

One thing i love about British submarines is the curves/shapes... The latest subs are all based on Whales.

Well done UK

I served on HMS Churchill ssn04 in the 70s I was impressed at it's almost spacecraft technology, but now compared with a modern ssn its like comparing a model t with a Tesla, however submariners still possess the toughness and resilience to operate these beasts. Together with our submarine brethren all around the world keeping us all safe I salute you, We are not called the silent service for nothing.

@WilliamEvans-py4gq

6 ай бұрын

Thank you for your service Many respects from 🇬🇧

British subs have a history of good so these better be amazing My dad served on HMS Artful amongst other boats

@cornellkirk8946

Жыл бұрын

The artful dodger?

@beerthug

Жыл бұрын

Saw a doctype show which questioned the effectiveness of the (Trafalgar class?) subs missile ability. Wasn't very flattering.

@englishmisfit9881

Жыл бұрын

I believe the HMS Artful was the recent submarine that was protecting the HMS Elisabeth II in the 'Task Force 21' in there trip into the South China Sea region recently that reportedly detected multiple Chinese subs trying to shadow the group.

@godwhymenowman

Жыл бұрын

We will NOT be buying these as this is BS, We have 6 already 4 working and 2 on standby which we can BARELY afford ffs

@jeffjohnson5053

Жыл бұрын

Make sure the Evil Chinese spies don't steal your tech. Evil chinese spies has already STOLEN all western military tech. Shame on you western nations for not keeping your secrets!

That's what I'm telling my wife, too. I'm getting larger to include more stealth features😁

@yamoto1833

Жыл бұрын

Lmfao😂

@Mr1990hjc

Жыл бұрын

The length is the greatest difference in these sea monsters. I'm sure their girth is roughly equivalent .My wife swears by the girth factor, especially when the order to submerge is given ! 👺

@SolarWebsite

Жыл бұрын

@@Mr1990hjc Raise periscope, eh?

@Mr1990hjc

Жыл бұрын

@@SolarWebsite well of course thats part of the order !

@petevan8942

Жыл бұрын

I'm not even going to say.....long hard and full of semen...sry I did😜

Nice to see captain Birdseye will be taking command, I feel reassured knowing the defense of the realm is in such capable hands! 😁

@BHALT0S

Жыл бұрын

he moved that boat with all the kids, there were rumours apparently

@jamesgriffiths3057

Жыл бұрын

Be better with uncle Albert, from only fools and horses!

@dufus7396

Жыл бұрын

Yum Birdseye chips..

@ivancotterill6101

Жыл бұрын

Very nice fish fingers apparently

@johnhankinson1929

Жыл бұрын

would you like fish fingers with that trident missile sir ?😁

The French subs don’t carry Trident missiles, they use a unit, built in France, based on the solid boosters from the Ariane 5 rocket.

@mehdi_fr711

Жыл бұрын

French SNLE carry the M51 French missile

@ceoaalp

Жыл бұрын

French military hardware is far inferior. While the US military is unmatched British military hardware is catching up. Also realistically I don't want to hear that a this sub is better than the US Navy Columbia class ballistic missile sub because its not. The Dreadnaught class ballistic missile sub is either equal or slightly worse. It doesn't matter if its less stealthy or if its payload lets it down. Example try comparing the Daring class destroyer to the Arleigh Burke class destroyer. The Daring class is let down by its payload. The Royal Navy has the best naval ships that Europe has to offer but the US Navy still has the best in the world even though China had surpassed it as the largest navy. Overall this Dreadnaught class ballistic missile sub is a excellent sub.

@arcanondrum6543

Жыл бұрын

The Ariane 5 is French with input from other European nations. The US Atlas 5 can't leave the ground without the Russian RD-180 (stockpiled pre-war) Engines. But more importantly, you 3 are begging for a future filled with War. So, after you verify that FACT and explain why Defense Contractors shipped jobs to China right after the Cold War consider this : Here's a quote from a now deceased man, he and his wife were lifelong Peace Activists : _"We're told that 'If we want Peace, We must prepare for War'. I say, _*_if you want Peace, prepare for Peace."_*

@howarddavies8937

Жыл бұрын

@@ceoaalp All these comments of yours are Top Secret, you wouldn't know.

@ceoaalp

Жыл бұрын

@@howarddavies8937 I wouldn't the details of it but the existence sure. People need to understand that especially the US government for example has amazing capabilities due to its top secret classified material. Another example even the most advanced consumer electronic product is light years behind what the US government actually has. What the general public knows is light years behind as well. You are right but you are also wrong.

It's worrying that the UK has to have weapons that can make deserts to countries that keep seeking to assert their power. However when a Bully is confronted he baks down and crawls back under the rock that he came from. These submarines have been so successful that they have been sitting just off the coast of the aggressor

Makes me proud of Blitish engineering 👍🏻

@dafyddthomas7299

Жыл бұрын

Pioneering stuff and best in the world since industrial revolution - provided we don't give it away for free.

@nathd1748

Жыл бұрын

@@dafyddthomas7299 Or start thinking that Plaid can deliver a better deal for Wales when they cannot....

@dickdastardly5534

Жыл бұрын

@@nathd1748 Plaid are completely out of touch with the majority of welsh peoples, they would have us rejoin the EU despite Wales voting overwhelmingly to leave, I leave you to draw your your own conclusions on how that stacks up with Welsh persons like me.

@nathd1748

Жыл бұрын

@@dickdastardly5534 It wasn't overwhelmingly. It was 52.5% to 47.5%. Seems there are a growing number of nationalists wanting Independence from the UK a bit like the Essenpeeee.

@dickdastardly5534

Жыл бұрын

@@nathd1748 772000 remain and 851000 (ONS)to leave with most constituencies averaging 10,000 votes in favour of leaving with the exception of vale of Glamorgan narrowly bucking the trend 5% was more than enough but Plaid still thinks that Wales should be back in along with Drakeford. Do you have any statistics of the growing number of nationalists wanting independence? I am not convinced there is as you say , the only reasonably accurate polls in what people want tend to be the exit polls during elections the voting public are known to be quite fickle.

Dreadnought is the most futuristic looking submarine out of the 3

@MrBassbump

Жыл бұрын

@Clipz 👀 closer many differences

@barracuda7018

Жыл бұрын

No remember, the British nuclear sub technology is based on technology transfer from the US... including reactor technology.

@jammiedodger7040

Жыл бұрын

@@barracuda7018 All the Technology used on British nuclear submarines is British technology including the nuclear reactors most of the Technologies America uses are British technologies

@barracuda7018

Жыл бұрын

@@jammiedodger7040 Bullshit....... en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/HMS_Dreadnought_(S101) This was the beginning..After that generation of British nuclear sub reactors were based on US design. Well there is no need for inferiority complex dude, after all they invented the nuclear submarine..Nautilis 1954..

@Mr.mysterious76

Жыл бұрын

@@barracuda7018 Here comes the jingo

This really makes a future world look amazing, that’s if there’s anyone still around to enjoy it.

This is the boat that us in Australia should be looking at.

@alistairbolden6340

Жыл бұрын

Australia don't need a boat to deliver nukclear missles so would be better off with a smaller less expensive attack class of sub. The Astute would be perfect for them.

@europa1387

Жыл бұрын

Astute class is the one mate great sub. Hope you get a few of them.

@glynnwright1699

Жыл бұрын

You will be getting 'Dreadnought Lite'.

That would be HMS George the 6th, not the 4th. Roman numerals VI is a 6.

I served on US fast attack submarines and I really wish it was possible for me to serve on these submarines with all of this new technology. The boats I rode seem to be prehistoric compared to these.

@GuinessOriginal

Жыл бұрын

Fancy starting a nuclear war do you?

@lancerevell5979

Жыл бұрын

I served in the USN back in the early 1980s on a Knox Class ASW Frigate, hunting subs. It would be interesting to talk with current sonar techs about how quiet the new subs aee compared to those old ones we chased. Forty years of advancement in submarine stealth would be interesting.

@StevenSmith-mk5fg

Жыл бұрын

@@GuinessOriginal Yeah baby!

@GuinessOriginal

Жыл бұрын

@@StevenSmith-mk5fg what a noob

@anthonywilson4873

Жыл бұрын

@@GuinessOriginal At this very moment in time a Russian thug, Putin has invaded Ukraine and the crazy team that supports him keeps threatening nuclear weapons. The only thing stopping them is knowing out there somewhere is a Boomer ready, if the Russians push the stupid button they know they will be wiped out, it’s called MAD mutually assured destruction. Contrary to you question they are stopping nuclear conflict.

I adore engineering at high level !!! When I look in my country there is nothing !!!

Submarines are NEVER ships. They're BOATS

@bertplank8011

Жыл бұрын

Big deal.

@user-js4mi8vw6q

5 ай бұрын

I know mate I work at BAE Barrow ..and I am an ex tankie.. I did not understand port starboard hull.. etc it's a whole new world

I have been fortunate to have been aboard our current V class subs a number of times ( my employer supplies engineering support services) Dreadnought can’t come soon enough, in contrast to some the comments on here, I was shocked by the condition and age of basic critical equipment, appalling might be appropriate. Massive respect to the mariners on board there ‘innovative solutions’ to the problems they face are what keeps these vessels moving. Based on what I have seen and heard the next gen will be rather like stepping from a model T into a McLaren, I hope they can overcome the obsolescence issues which plague these long life platforms.

@dondouglass6415

Жыл бұрын

VI is 6 not 4

@knowsmebyname

7 ай бұрын

I have read articles on US Navy budgeting meetings and the brass continuously saying "the Columbia Class is getting funded". It must be very hard to resist kicking the can down the road on a project such as this. The cost is astronomical and it doesn't do anything to ease current needs. So those that have to make these budget choices have my sympathy.

Loads of expected derogatory jibes on here of course, but I'm glad the Royal Navy will have world-class submarines as Britain's nuclear deterrent, crewed by some of the best-trained sailors in the world.

The tradition of using the same first letter should be kept! Dreadnought, Derek, Denzil and Dave!

@alanhutchins5916

9 ай бұрын

Uncle Albert deserves a ship tbh…

@Dave-hu5hr

5 ай бұрын

Bring back HMS Rodney. 🇬🇧

I live in Birmingham, which was known as the workshop of the world during the height of the Industrial Revolution. During that era there were more patents applied in the aforementioned city, than the entire world combined. It has been estimated that the singular most effective instrument in terms of its ability to achieve the highest returns in relation to its initial and ongoing investment of both manpower and capital, which in turn would be the largest contributor in establishing the largest and most powerful empire in world history. It is known as the Royal Navy. Subsequently, the fighting unit that can claim to be the most celebrated, and successful, due to the fact that it has proven itself in every major campaign, as well as its role within the Royal Navy. Acting as a crucially important detachment of a ship’s company. During more than 350 years of service it has also been both pivotal and proven itself vital in attaining the goals of Empire.

They should take one of these and turn it into a 'New Age' aircraft carrier. Rather than missiles it would launch 'drone fast boats', which in turn could carry and launch any number of airborne drone 'assault packages' for specific missions, or massive drone attacks to overwhelm any air defense system. I only know half of everything but I feel like something of this nature is the future of the aircraft carrier.

@_Mentat

Жыл бұрын

The USS Jimmy Carter has all sorts of classified tech on board, including a moon pool so special forces divers, minisubs and ROVs can egress while submerged.

@slythewhyissilent

Жыл бұрын

@@_Mentat Still a giant bullseye.

@boofuu3145

Жыл бұрын

i seen somewhere modern military can deploy thousands out the back of a plane , and they swarm onto a target/targets , AI tech

@RB747domme

Жыл бұрын

Lol it literally says that it has drone pockets on the Navy site. Drone pockets will open when the ship surfaces in order to do local surveillance and high altitude radar tracking for search and destroy coordination of surface ships. So, the MOD are way ahead of you my friend.

The French Submarine Carry the SLBM M51 not the SLBM TRIDENT D5

@tinto278

Жыл бұрын

🤡youtube channels go from covid, climate, Ukraine and then nuclear weapons experts.

As long as it's as good as their aircraft carrier Britain's defense is sound as a pound.

@paullangford8179

Жыл бұрын

We're doomed|!

@albert21able

Жыл бұрын

But they can't stop the daily Invasion of mostly Young unarmed men of fighting age on England's South Coast

@bertplank8011

Жыл бұрын

As THOUSANDS of illegal immigrants enter Britain and are put up in 4 star hotels while its own citizens are homeless.....not sound as a pound.....sheer madness.A deliberate changing of Britains ethnic makeup by the elites who dont represent the public....not by a long shot.Ultimately this policy will destroy Britains identity and result in collapse before this century is out....

Yes it is unique , it flies under the clouds.

@williamanderson5437

Жыл бұрын

That's Supercar, and under the sea too........Good old Gerry Anderson, rip, bless him.

Small commentary point. I am not sure about the American Navy, and correct me if I am wrong but I think you will find that submarines in the British Navy are called 'boats', not 'ships'.

@mac22011964

7 ай бұрын

Correct.

@moiradalgleish

2 ай бұрын

Another small commentary point. There's no such a thing as the 'British Navy', it's called the Royal Navy. 😀

When it comes to naval technology we Brits always seem to be one of the most advanced of players.

@Mercer1012

Жыл бұрын

They just cannot afford to build enough of their subs. 8-10 SSN's is barely a deterrent. Especially with Russia and China rapidly approaching having more subs than NATO.

@williammorley2401

Жыл бұрын

@@Mercer1012 , did you not hear them say that one Dreadnought submarine could wipe out all of mainland China, and the UK is building 4 of them!?

@Mercer1012

Жыл бұрын

@@williammorley2401 That's false. There are no nuclear weapons that powerful. Ask either the video is engaging in hyperbole or they're just wrong.

@3204clivesinclair

Жыл бұрын

@@Mercer1012 it's not a single weapon. 16 tubes, each missile can be armed with multiple warheads, which release and cover a much larger area than a single wahead

@Mercer1012

Жыл бұрын

@@3204clivesinclair I'm aware of how a MIRV works. You'll note that each warhead is very small in order to fit in the nose cone of the SLBM. Thus it has more warheads, but they are all smaller than one large one. You might wish to learn how large the blast radius of one of the W88, W76-1, and W76-2 warheads is. These are measured in kilotons not megatons. Little boy at Hiroshima was 15 KT, the highest number of warheads that can be carried are the W76-2 variant at 14 warheads and these have yields of only 5-7 KT. They are only 1/3 as powerful as the bomb dropped on Hiroshima.

The Sail looks EXACTLY like the submarine in the television series I watched as a kid (I’m 61 now!), “Voyage Beneath The Seas!” Starring Richard Basehart. 🇺🇸

@lancerevell5979

Жыл бұрын

"Voyage To The Bottom Of The Sea". The original move (Walter Pigeon as the Admiral) was on DISH TV a coiple days ago. This new British sub lacks the Seaview's sail planes.

@Dragonblaster1

Жыл бұрын

@@lancerevell5979 And the Flying Sub and panoramic front windows.

@victory2115

Жыл бұрын

Loved that series when I was a kid. 😎

About time we had a new warspite.

@QuotidianStupidity

Жыл бұрын

Great name

@rebellion2054

Жыл бұрын

It's 'ask questions later' but more eloquently put 👍

I read "Running Critical" over 30 years ago. It's a book about the development of the 688 Class (Los Angeles) attack subs. Near the end it describe how the "new" US subs compared to those of other nations (NATO and Soviet). The take-away was that the UK subs are at least a generation ahead of the US in almost every way, especially in reactor and propulsion. In addition, the UK Captains routinely beat the US in naval war games. This looks like the major NATO countries are all leveling-up to the new UK standards.

@Mercer1012

Жыл бұрын

They can be this way because they only have like 8 submarines in their entire navy. The US has far more submarines to build, maintain, and crew so obviously standards will be lower due to sheer quantity.

@NickeyChevelle

Жыл бұрын

"30 years ago," and now?

@waynecampeau4566

Жыл бұрын

@@NickeyChevelle I expect that the Royal Navy still kicks our ass. Our military is way too controlled by the industrial complex that is spawned, they are still force to buy obsolete equipment that they don't need or want just because the house and senate want those old jobs to keep going in their states and districts. If you look back to the pre WW-II history. It was the RN that was pushing aircraft carrier development, Radar, and jet engines.

@lukedogwalker

Жыл бұрын

@@Mercer1012 I don't follow your logic. You can build large numbers of the same class in batches, incorporating upgrades as you go. If you only build a handful, you have fewer opportunities to build in upgrades, so must retrofitthem, which is expensive and difficult.

@Mercer1012

Жыл бұрын

@@lukedogwalker The US has to build, maintain, and crew many more submarines than NATO nations, which, while they may cost less per unit, will cost far more for the entire program, decisions must be made that might cut back on R&D due to costs per unit. British and other NATO subs *are* more costly per unit than US subs are usually. As for British crews being better, having only 8 subs means you have far smaller numbers of crew needed, so you can have the cream of the crop. While the US sub fore does get the cream of the crop, they need far more crew for their 67 subs, so once getting the best of the best, they will have to start lowering standards little by little to get the numbers required. This is the case for any large organization. The Netherlands, Denmark, and the UK have all routinely beaten our subs in wargames because of the dilution of skill throughout the US sub force and the necessary reduction in quality of equipment to sustain required quantity.

Derby is a city in Derbyshire England. It is pronounced Dar-be not Durr-be 😊

I was a Shipwright at HMS dockyard Chatham in 1962, the original Dreadnaught nuclear sub was refitted there back in the 60's but today they are wasting the time with massive bulk of metal, todays warfare is all about Drones and Lasers, an alien told me.

Hms warspite used to be a battleship. And it had a hell of a story

Are other US allies updating naval capabilities? Some of them are too small to develop such on their own, I'd think. But i can see the Dutch and the Swedes collaborating to the benefit of NATO.

Build the next sub bigger so that they would be harder to detect. Makes perfect sense.

@Mercer1012

Жыл бұрын

It does because size has nothing to do with stealthiness. The larger size affords more space for sound absorbing materials and thicker acoustic tiles. The main noisemaker for a sub is the power plant, and with natural circulation and other features, this should be quieter than the existing subs.

@Deleteyourself83

Жыл бұрын

Tell me you know nothing about the subject without telling me you know nothing about the subject.

Looks amazing 👏

The French do not use Trident missiles. They use their own M51 ICBMs

Because Stealthy keeps you Healthy.

Someone tell the Americans you don't need a tennis court on a submarine.

@NullHand

Жыл бұрын

The submariner version is nerf racquetball, played in fuzzy bedroom slippers for extra noise reduction. The Silent Service has always had special needs.

@mrsiborg

Жыл бұрын

@@NullHand Interesting..

@lcubed11

Жыл бұрын

the russians have a swimming pool inside their ballistic missile subs

@lcubed11

Жыл бұрын

@@beepthesheep867 unfortunately, i do understand russian well enough. it's definitely not a ballast tank. it might be a dual use spent fuel storage/swimming pool

@wor53lg50

Жыл бұрын

@@lcubed11 haha, hope he wasnt the one commenting saying "how can it be stealthy being that big" ive seen the clip aswell, and yes it looks like a 1960's tiled outdoor kiddies pool...

It seems as though someone doesn’t know their Roman numerals: 6:13 I doubt there will ever be a Royal Navy sub or ship named after King George 4th

@andypandy9013

Жыл бұрын

Georgy Porgy, pudding and pie, Kissed the girls and made them cry When the girls came out to play Georgy Porgy ran away. 🤣🤣🤣

@geraiswaiya2347

Жыл бұрын

Well, why not?

@bretthughes1563

Жыл бұрын

@@andypandy9013 Exactly, I think he (King George 4th) was 20st when he died? British nursery rhymes, they are a wonderful thing! I suppose like you, people have to be in the know? An education, it seems to be a dying thing these days?

@bretthughes1563

Жыл бұрын

@@geraiswaiya2347 Where shall I start? I suppose the sub would then have the nick name “Georgie Porgie”. I doubt the Royal navy nor the Ministry of Defence would allow the name King George 4th to be used for that reason. And because KG4 was in monetary debt most of the time; often seen drunk, a alcoholic, & ridiculed because of it; known for his many mistresses; thought to have several illegitimate children; he was obese & addicted to opium (or laudanum if you prefer). I could go on, but will end with what was published in the Times when he died, “There never was an individual less regretted by his fellow-creatures than this deceased king…”

@hb1338

Жыл бұрын

@@geraiswaiya2347 Do your own research. The Wikipedia page treats George quite gently - for a less benign view, read the biography by Steven Parissien. Or if you want the most accurate account of them all, try series 3 of Blackadder.

Looks like someone on the design team watch Voyage to the Bottom of the Sea, back in the day. Looks a lot like the SeaView, Or Hollywood got a lot right by guessing. Cool sub!

@Agent77X

Жыл бұрын

No flying sub yet!

@johnmaguire2185

Жыл бұрын

Way back the UK were unhappy with stingray due to its propulsion being a bit too close to design ideas at the time.

@chrisredding6673

Жыл бұрын

But ... can it electrify its hull to free itself from a giant octopus? 🙂

@williamanderson5437

Жыл бұрын

Way Hey - Watch out for the weekly monster - coming soon to a dockyard near you...........

@jonathanstrong4812

Жыл бұрын

@@williamanderson5437 Way Hey huh?

This is great. British innovation changes the world. Long may it continue.

Sound's good Britain u lead other's follow

The French SSBNs are not armed with Trident D-5 SLBMs. The new French SSBNs will be armed with 16 M51 missiles with six to ten TNO 100kt thermonuclear warheads.

Nice going, UK. Glad we're allies. 🇺🇸

I like how the Brits name their vessels after virtues or lofty abstractions, e.g., Dreadnought, Invincible, etc. In the US, powerful lobbying groups get to tack on the names of some lackluster presidents to our capital ships.

@paulgregory7328

Жыл бұрын

Uss ship biden

@Charlie.93

Жыл бұрын

Yeah british war ships have the best names

@bosunmate7301

10 ай бұрын

The Royal Navy embodies centuries of naval tradition and the projection of dominant sea power. I'm not British but served for a time attached to the Royal Navy. Initially I begrudged their superior view of all things Naval. Today I concede they are the benchmark. Patrick O'Brien is compulsory reading for naval buffs.

@dannycostello

7 ай бұрын

I believe only US presidents who have served in the military are the only ones used for shops though which isn't a bad tradition however I do agree we in the UK do have the best names.

uk give usa and other allies info of their new sub. But i can promise you right now, uk are 50 years ahead of tech sub. You might comment because its what you dont want to hear.

The British are the best at building shipping , everybody copies them .

@polduseri909

Жыл бұрын

Do the Titanic means anything to you?

@Alan-nl5bx

Жыл бұрын

@@polduseri909 titanic was built in Ireland 🤦‍♂️

@marrqi7wini54

Жыл бұрын

@@Alan-nl5bx Titanic sank in 1912. Ireland's war of independence didn't start until 1919 and they weren't independent until 1921. They were still under the United Kingdom.

@user-cx5io9uc8e

Жыл бұрын

@@polduseri909 Captain fault

@SamG-py7ej

Жыл бұрын

@@Alan-nl5bx Belfast City...... UK

Dear Mr Computer Voice, the correct name for one of the new subs is King George the VI (6th) not the 4th as you stated. BH

3:33 the French "boomer" won't carry Trident. It will be armed with M-51 missiles. 6:24, that's King George the 6th!!

Well that's a new one: 'different than'. We often get the wrong combination that is 'different to'. I've not seen your 'than' version before. It's certainly different from the usual error

I wonder how the deal with Australia and AUKUS fits into this?

@Orbital_Inclination

7 ай бұрын

Dreadnought is for nuclear deterrence. The AUKUS project is for an attack sub, like the Astute class

The schematics they show keep the “X” configuration for the stern fins, but the hulls under construction show the “+” configuration. Are they showing outdated schematics or do they rotate?

@Wick9876

Жыл бұрын

Presumably they are showing the wrong submarines under construction because they couldn't find video of current construction.

@robertgowling191

Жыл бұрын

@@Wick9876 Agree with that

@tonyv8925

Жыл бұрын

Astute class assembly video clips? For security reasons perhaps.

@stupidburp

Жыл бұрын

It isn’t built yet. The video is mostly of other vessels, just visual filler.

It's amazing that these new ships can switch from a conventional tail to a cruciform arrangement and back again over and over during their construction. Or, is this video just another one of those using commonly available clips of random subs?

@dominicbuckley8309

Жыл бұрын

2:00 And apparently it's going to be armed with the same triple torpedo tube launcher as mounted in the WW2 HMS Exeter in World of Warships. It's in colour, so it must be true!

@michaeldelaney7271

Жыл бұрын

@@dominicbuckley8309 Good One! If the folks who make videos like this would only say "we don't have any photos of the actual ship, so we're showing some vaguely similar vessels, artist concepts and game images." Guess that's too honest.

@_Mentat

Жыл бұрын

Don't knock the variable geometry tail. All the best subs have them these days.

@michaeldelaney7271

Жыл бұрын

@@_Mentat I thought maybe the tails might be called "Quick Change" because they change so quickly and so often, as if by magic. Ah, the joys of stock photos.

I like the lines on Dreadnaught class.

As we have seen in Ukraine, small remotely operated ordnance is the way to go. We should build smaller drone subs carrying maybe 4 nuke guided torpedos. Showing less of a surface or wave pattern on radar systems, able to lie and wait for months without the need to communicate.

@captain61games49

Жыл бұрын

While yes that's a good idea, the idea is that these SDBNs are a deterrence not for a blow for blow war.

@ivarwind

Жыл бұрын

"Remotely operated ... without the need to communicate." Yes, that's... erh... certainly the way to go!

Such a shame that the real Warspite was scrapped

@davidbrown2571

11 ай бұрын

It was more than a shame, many politicians actually don't support the uk.theyd rather answer to other masters.

6:20 I do not believe the Royal Navy would name any ship George the fourth (which by the way is IV. VI as you have is 6). They are using Dreadnought Battleship names for the new submarines. The only ones named George were George V. (Fifth) The first was from World War 1, the second from World War 2.

@johnhankinson1929

Жыл бұрын

it's george the fourth , not forth ,that'd be go forth and as you say V1 = 6th

@cozmcwillie7897

Жыл бұрын

@@johnhankinson1929 I will correct this, thanks. I must've gone temporarily insane.

@Gynra

Жыл бұрын

Just a thought: King George VI, while not given to a previous Royal Navy vessel, may have been considered as he was the Queen's father. Now she has passed, that may not be the case. We shall have to wait and see.

The french picked a snappy class name!

I can already tell it is not TOTALLY DIFFERENT.

@nix4644

Жыл бұрын

LOL...exactly. Totally different would look something like a box shape with dive planes all over it😉

Submarines Submerge not sink (intentionally)

@dafyddthomas7299

Жыл бұрын

Unless it is Russian - then it either impodes - Kursk or the crew get burnt and Radiated - K19 as examples. RIP to the fallen and Loyal to their motherland the Russian Sailors; Certainly don't support the Putin regime.

Barrow-in-Furness in NW England? That’s going to surprise Scotland! 😂

@Sarcypants

Ай бұрын

It's in Cumbria, in England.

6:06 They should have named one HMS Thunder Child.😎

To be called unique shouldn't the list of features not include "just like" some other submarine?

@chrisredding6673

Жыл бұрын

How can *four* submarines all be unique? Just saying ...

@znail4675

Жыл бұрын

@@chrisredding6673 There are some submarines that are or will be unique when they enter service. Finding 4 might be a challenge.

Rule Britannia, Britannia rules the waves, Britons never never never shall be slaves ❤💪🇬🇧

@IanJones-ht3kk

Жыл бұрын

We now have Liz Truss as PM, so don't be too sure. She's "100% focused on growing the economy", and the most efficient way to do that is with slave labour.

@mazatlan79P

Жыл бұрын

@@IanJones-ht3kk I don't think you understand how free market economy works. Quick recap: it works only when BOTH parties benefit :)

@beerthug

Жыл бұрын

Rule little Britannia, Britania rules the waves around the channel, Britons were slaves more than once. Empires don't reappear, just a slow disappear.

Looking forward to her putting to sea, that should give the PRC a moment or two of pause.

@beerthug

Жыл бұрын

They have plenty to worry about besides a British sub.

56% of inventions industrial revolution oil drilling railways internet etc not bad for a little island 💪

@superdatcha4218

6 ай бұрын

56% ! internet ! that’s all bullshit

Does it have an on board foodbank?

@johnlyden7243

Жыл бұрын

It's the main reason they don't stay out on longer patrols. They don't need fuel, make their own air and water, but alas, running out of tea and biscuits requires them to go ashore sooner rather than later.

@wor53lg50

Жыл бұрын

Beats chunks of lard...

@bertplank8011

Жыл бұрын

Four star hotels for illegal immigrants....the SHTF moment will hit before the century is out.....

Now, isn't it a shame that we don't know how much the whole programme costs?

@davidelliott5843

Жыл бұрын

Ukraine gave away its nukes and failed to build a strong enough conventional defence. Putin’s war is costing millions of lives and uncountable money. Costs of the Dreadnought deterrent is a tiny fraction of what actual war costs. The actual pile of £££ is irrelevant.

@jarodarmstrong509

Жыл бұрын

I think this years has proven the value of nuclear deterrent programs. Don’t worry, the UK will still be spending plenty on welfare

@geraiswaiya2347

Жыл бұрын

@@jarodarmstrong509 surely the opposite, given how much combat has been limited even within conventional means. At £25bn for 4, they make even the carriers look like a bargain

@mazatlan79P

Жыл бұрын

Entire defence spending is less than 3% of UK budget, or 10 times less than on social welfare ...

@stephenwilson2951

Жыл бұрын

When Putins around with his subs price is fine.

They all need to HURRY UP and get them operational.

She looks awsome she kinda reminds me of the sea view from the voyage to the bottom of the sea TV series back in the 60s

What's to bet that the sharing goes only one way and that's information to the yanks.

@bobthebomb1596

Жыл бұрын

I wouldn't take that bet if I were you. If a country has something that can aid the US they tend to get a lot back in return.

@jarodarmstrong509

Жыл бұрын

The Uk would barely know what’s going on in Paris if not for the CIA. How about just saying thank you America for covering our asses for the last century at your own expense

@dafyddthomas7299

Жыл бұрын

@@jarodarmstrong509 Think you find it's two way help between UK and US from WW1 onwards. lets be truthful about things - along with help from Commonwealth and the Free Europeans / Resistance during WW2. Another example as a whole gave lot of help, arms, $$, food, planes, tanks to turncoat stalin (evil tyrant not only invaded Poland but killed his own generals) who sided with Hitler but Hitler turned on him, didn't believe intel from UK about invasion, dithered; got his people killed unnecessary in the 100,000+ and got saved by the the Allies via one major route the Artic convey aided by UK Royal & US Navy + Uk/US and commonwealth merchant ships.

@bobthebomb1596

Жыл бұрын

@@jarodarmstrong509 The US did not cover "our asses" at it's own expense though. The term was "lend lease" and we paid hell of a lot in return. Rationing in the UK was worse in the immediate post war than it had been during the war and the UK did not finish paying for WW2 until 2007. As I said in my reply, you get a lot back in return if you are able to provide the US with something they do not have and the UK would indeed be worse off if relations were broken. Just remember though that the CIA (and the OSS before it) were largely modelled on MI6 and the SOE. Your Delta force and Seal Teams were modelled on the SAS/SBS. Things might be weighted, but it is still a two way street.

@NullHand

Жыл бұрын

This new sub is going to be carrying enough of our Lockheed SLBMs to slag the Eastern Seaboard. I would say that's a lot of trust and sharing right there.

Every weapon is another nail in the earth's coffin.

@dafyddthomas7299

Жыл бұрын

Earth will survive most things that humans throw at it - even total N-exchange; mostly like scenario will be insects will survive but only 100k - 500k humans ( blast, burns - no med help, radiation from weapons and also from exposed N/ Power plants - Chernobyl x N and Oil / Chemical fires / smoke ) in the world; average insects likely to cope / mutate from this and thrive long term; Humans won't adapt / probably be like Mad Max and Pillars of the Earth mixed together. Anyone that trashes me / disagrees with me is a total ^%^%^^% end and possibly listening to hype of US / Russian Leaders & Media - saying that Global N / War is survivable - examples of good films on this is When Wind Blows and Depressing but truthful Threads.

@nathd1748

Жыл бұрын

Why is it? The reactor for the Dreadnoughts are going to be applied to on land nuclear reactors to remove the need for fossil fuels. Also our Trident system is what stops Vlad Putin from getting stupid ideas against us.

@Eric-kn4yn

Жыл бұрын

OK let imperial 🇨🇳 China win

@mazatlan79P

Жыл бұрын

Mutually Assured Destruction doctrine is responsible for longest worldwide peace period in history

The French get access to Trident missiles, when we don't even share nuclear reactor technology with them? I think your mistaken. The French sub is a generation behind British and American subs, in missiles and reactors.

The new French SSBN will NOT be using Trident missiles, but instead will be using an indigenous SLBM design called the M51.

I think it was either Norway or Sweden who actually sunk a Aircraft carrier during simulation NATO exercises They are using Steerling engines. Which are 99 percent quiet. Very few moving parts. Like electric motors

@beerthug

Жыл бұрын

Swedish Gotland. Americans couldn't believe it until shown the periscope photos.

@englishmisfit9881

Жыл бұрын

Depends on requirements ... i.e Nuclear Submarines/Pumpjet Propulsion vs Electric/Diesel/Propeller Propulsion. One does better at higher speeds whilst the other at lower speeds when comes to acoustic signature of their respective sub type.

@glynnwright1699

Жыл бұрын

Invented by the British. Robert Stirling, a Scottish clergyman.

@jameswhyard2858

Жыл бұрын

An Australian Collins also "sunk" a US Carrier in the Pacific...

The greatest Navy ever ,and when we get these on station would really help world peace.

@DavyRo

Жыл бұрын

World peace??? I suppose you're one of those who think we are always right & fair. Just like our NATO members. NATO being purely for defensive & never the aggressor are you? If so keep believing the BBC in your happy world of fantasy. We gained the biggest empire in history totally based on peace & fairness also didn't we? I'm being realistic with you because I find your comment staggering & naive to be honest. The best thing about it, the likes of you support the suffering we impose in others. While you receive no benefit of this whatsoever. The peace loving leaders we have look after their own with their I'll gotten gains. While it's us commoners who earn their gains & suffer most in their games of greed. But if the BBC says their new Dr Evil caused all the problems & we are just going to make things right. It must be true mustn't it? Jesus christ ignorance is bliss.

@michellebrown4903

Жыл бұрын

Erm ... l am reminded of the first episode of " Yes Prime Minister". The Right Honourable Jim Hacket taking up his duties and being briefed on his nuclear responsibilities . " What if l went mad and tried to launch a strike?" He asks . " I wouldn't worry too much about that Prime Minister , the telephone operator will probably be asleep " . Ah , those were the days when we didn't have a chip on our shoulders, and could have a laugh at our own expense . Now ,thanks to Brexit and the Tories ,we are riddled with self doubt and a feeling of diminishment , and make bellicose noises/boasts in an attempt to mask that diminishment.

Just amazing tech, we do know how to design a good submarine🤣

I find it highly unlikely the French will use Trident II. Not least of all because Trident II entered service in 1990, whereas the current French M51 SLBM was first deployed in 2010.

Let me guess.... super stealthy... super missiles.... super torpedos... am I about right about this “revolutionary” sub?

@alistairbolden6340

Жыл бұрын

Not really, all subs have good missiles torps and are built for stealth, The UK's one has a focus on Radar since the UK makes the best in the world, and on drone tech. As in underwater mini subs that it launches to push out its detection range.

@chrisdean6700

Жыл бұрын

I hear their Spearfish torps are just as good as our MK 48's.

Marvellous. Rule Britannica!

@beerthug

Жыл бұрын

Rule what? That kingdom went the way of every other superpower throughout history!

@PB-xh8xt

Жыл бұрын

@@beerthug He says....... in English looool

@britishpatriot7386

Ай бұрын

​@@beerthug we still kick arses though cupcake 😂

I don't think the French subs will have Trident!

@jimwalsh8520

Жыл бұрын

No, the French will not, they cannot afford them and only the USA and UK will ever have them.

@howarddavies8937

Жыл бұрын

The French have their own missiles

@jimwalsh8520

Жыл бұрын

@@howarddavies8937 Yes indeed they do and they are all over 40 years old. History tell us, the French forget what is best for the world but only think of what is best for the French

@howarddavies8937

Жыл бұрын

@@jimwalsh8520 And I suppose you think that we are perfect.

@jimwalsh8520

Жыл бұрын

@@howarddavies8937 Well not perfect but, close! You have a love for the French then?

I love these 'guesstimate' posts. Part wish list, part feasible, part nope.

I'm from Barrow-in-Furness and most of this video footage is not the ship yard where the subs get built.

As a country we produce some amazing high end tech! I just hope that we start exporting some of this stuff

@matty6848

Жыл бұрын

Well apparently the Australian Navy has put in a huge order for nuclear powered British built subs, although they won’t actually carry nuclear weapons themselves which I find strange? Especially with the ever growing threat from nuclear equipped and ready Communist china.

If its a reliable and breaks down as much as their newest aircraft Carrier Britain's enemies won't have too much about it. The ship is brand new and it keeps breaking down and having to be escorted back to port from the middle of the ocean. It is possibly classified but their submarines probably want fairing much better either.

@glynnwright1699

Жыл бұрын

Gerald Ford was laid down in 2009, it has just been declared fully operational 13 years later. HMS Prince of Wales took about 9 years to become operational. From what I have been told, the Rolls Royce reactors perform significantly better than the US equivalents.

Nuclear Submarines need Cooling Pumps . They are always louder than Diesel/Electric Submarines.

WE ARE GREAT BRITAIN..❤

4 Dreadnoughts in the repair yard at any one time. The Chinese steel has little trackers sandwiched in it that Chinese satelllites can communicate with.

@welshpete12

Жыл бұрын

Ha ha ! why would they use Chinese steel when there is much better available ?

@rosewhite---

Жыл бұрын

@@welshpete12 the carriers used Chinese. Do we make steel in UK anymore? But didn't MoD admit Chinese steel was used in last sub to be launched?

@MinkieWinkle

Жыл бұрын

@@rosewhite--- so what, not like we Xray it all anyway, so who cares. Further more, do you honestly think that when steel is ordered they have a " to be used on x y or z " project on the order ? no It would be no different to any other firm ordering steel. how much what size. that is it. they gonna stick millions of trackers in every component they release? no

@rosewhite---

Жыл бұрын

@@MinkieWinkle You must be Scotch to be so dumb. I was joking about the trackers in the steel. The steel has a memory and will guide the subs to Beijing.

@bobthebomb1596

Жыл бұрын

Bloody well made trackers if they can survive the steel manufacturing process.

yeah the british are building alot of new warships and un manned helicopters for the nazy these dreadnought subs are just tip of the ice berg of whats to come ,plus the euro fighter at end of its career so theres a new fighter also in the works. Britain should be great again and it will again

The uk, being tiny n a lot of its income being sent abroad to poor nations n ppl by its public moreso than any other nation, still manages to punch well above its weight. One thing the british hv, if not money to spare, is intelligence. They can outwit most enemies n do more with a lot less. Britain is the best nation on earth n so may it remain.

USA : we name our new sub COLUMBIA , Britain : ok we name our Dreadnought. French: ?? ehmm SNLE-3G.. :D :D

France doesn't use Trident missiles and I've heard nothing about them using them in the future.