The Local Cess Pool

8 жыл бұрын

Rock-a-Doodle - Deleted Skunk Pie Sequence Excerpt (Animated by Jean Morel)

Пікірлер

@jb8888888886 күн бұрын

My favorite part is where Bambi meets Godzilla.

@Digglesisdead16 күн бұрын

I came here after watching Hardware Wars, the 1978 and 1997 comparison.

@Nekogi200816 күн бұрын

When Disney meets Toho

@wp587517 күн бұрын

Bambi put up a better fight!

@auntbelinda655523 күн бұрын

Trump vs Harris

@AdrianWaitemusic24 күн бұрын

A buddy of mine who was involved with this turned me on to it. A mind altering experience, to be sure.😳

@ben274126 күн бұрын

Eternal campions (saga cd) reminded me of this

@alextrebek8293Ай бұрын

i wonder what dark thing bambi did to get stomped on like that

@roopskАй бұрын

0:53 oof

@ErichoTTAАй бұрын

You gave a 1/10 to "The Empire Strikes Back", which is even more beloved than "The Lion King".

@wolf2912Ай бұрын

Do you talk about Matthew or yms

@okagronАй бұрын

5:06 The point of this scene was to show Anton is just as vulnerable as any other human being. The movie before this scene showed Anton as an unstoppable killing machine, seemingly invincible, but the fact Moss managed to wound him and survive their encounter in the hotel shows that Anton is not invincible. It also shows how the encounter wounded him emotionally, you can see him visibly angry during the whole scene.

@petergrandahl2386Ай бұрын

Bambi vs Godzilla was kind of like the Trump vs Biden debate.

@jayrubin01Ай бұрын

Sup Mitch 😉

@chrishutt66ytАй бұрын

Trump vs Biden (Guess which one!)😅😅😅

@PJGirondoАй бұрын

Godzilla 1985 intro!!

@ThisHeerGiraffeАй бұрын

Did you really have to spoil the ending in the thumbnail. Stupid.

@Scribble2345Ай бұрын

10/10

@someguy42093Ай бұрын

This is quite bad. Game grumps lied

@Whitehot724Ай бұрын

So THAT'S what made the footprint in Fallout

@thomasb73472 ай бұрын

Also Timon and Pumba werent really seen as paragons of virtue, they were hedonists ignoring reality after being kicked from their communtiew

@benjaminguzman86452 ай бұрын

This is one of the worst reviews I've ever heard.

@hookedonphoenix31122 ай бұрын

Confused Matthew needs to come back as a right-wing grifter channel/daddy figure for fatherless conservatives and bitch about Disney again. He’ll get 300K subscribers overnight and be on EFAP and Critical Drinker’s podcast week.

@Gloupkt2 ай бұрын

Bro all these rejected cartoon movies just be sad

@billpholde48162 ай бұрын

Back when they really knew how to develop characters.

@masonday86422 ай бұрын

Christopher Plummer as The Grand Duke of Owls Tim Curry as A Skunk

@howie97512 ай бұрын

Saw this at a Dr. Dimento/Weird Al concert back in 1982.

@SanDiegoHarry12 ай бұрын

classic

@toastnjam73842 ай бұрын

Anybody remember movie theater midnight showings? That's where I first saw this back in the mid 70's. I don't recall the movie but this I remember.

@JestersGesture2 ай бұрын

Thumbnail approved

@danielfife3482 ай бұрын

Glad they got rid of that scene and how did the light from the fire not affect him?

@awakeningofevolutiontheiro10572 ай бұрын

Me towards Lanolin in the IDW Sonic series.

@randallsowers73142 ай бұрын

"Bambi's wardrobe by Marv Newman" is my favorite part haha

@patricklemmon82602 ай бұрын

Inevitable

@amiejohnston28422 ай бұрын

Classic. 😁😂❤️

@nontew852 ай бұрын

It’s weird when I was probably about five years old and I wasn’t quite catching onto the humor. I found this to be intriguingly terrifying. I saw this before Godzilla 1985

@Dominic-ob1ei2 ай бұрын

Dark

@Jrez3 ай бұрын

why did he use the big emotional music??

@user-rt9zq8rs9k3 ай бұрын

Sniff sniff , Tito get me a tissue !

@mathaddict593 ай бұрын

What? Bambi doesn't get to go 15 rounds like Rocky?

@charlesgrenada93693 ай бұрын

The most unfunny thing ever created

@Onemanshowoff3 ай бұрын

I miss Mskull, truly was ahead of his time with how he saw the internet and the people that lived on it

@AWSVids3 ай бұрын

I used to listen to Confused Matthew a lot back in the day when he was posting... and I'm no expert, so take this with a grain of salt... but I believe he's probably somewhere on the autism spectrum. He demonstrates a fundamental lack of understanding when it comes to anything abstract or subtextual. He only understands meaning when it's really clear and straight-forward and logical in the movie. If it's at all left up to interpretation or done in a roundabout way, he seems to miss it or misunderstand it. If the explanation for things is more emotional than logical, or goes against logic in any way, or has dramatic irony, etc, then he gets frustrated very easily, in a way that suggests an insecurity with his inability to understand something. It's like a compulsion he needs everything to be perfectly logical. If you look at his reviews of his favorite movies and his explanations as to why he likes them, he'll always relate even the most emotional value of the movie to something logical. An example would be his Moulin Rouge review, when he talks about why Christian and Satine's love is so strong, despite it being so fast and brief... He says that he had this complaint with Romeo and Juliet in high school, and his teacher had to explain to him ("with the patience of a saint" apparently, suggesting Matthew was very stubborn about it) that it doesn't matter what an objective perspective would have to say about their love... it's real and deep and meaningful to them because it's their subjective perspective of being in love with each other, and that overrides logic or practicality in people's brains. Matthew had to be specifically explained this. He couldn't feel it. It had to be put into logical words and made mechanical before he understood it. Another example is The Dark Knight. The way he explains why he loves that movie is largely centered around the Joker's twisted logic and how that's specifically intended, which is very clear by the point Joker starts telling different backstories about his scars. At this point, Confused Matthew makes the point, "There is nothing to understand about this man." and that's what's so scary about him to Matthew. Not being able to understand the Joker scares Matthew as much as any lack of logic or esoteric meaning in a movie does... but the difference with the Joker is that it's clear this was intended, so Matthew is able to logically grasp onto the fact that at least this lack of logic IS what the meaning is. The Joker represents chaos and does that very well, and very clearly. Very explicitly. Even logically. He specifically states "I'm an agent of chaos." and explains *logically* why he acts illogically. Matthew is able to grasp this and actually enjoy something subversive and esoteric for once, so he liked it for that reason. If the Joker's philosophy had been left up to interpretation, then Matthew probably would have been doing a Confused Matthew review of The Dark Knight and yelling, "The Jokers actions MAKE NO SENSE! WHY would he get himself caught? WHY would he care about these people on the boats? WHY would he burn the money after he did all this just to get it?! WHAT THE HELL IS GOING ON IN THIS MOVIE?!?!" But, luckily for Matthew... they explain it in clearly worded dialogue every step of the way. "Some men aren't looking for anything logical... some men just want to watch the world burn." ... "The Joker planned to get caught. He wanted me to lock him up in the MCU!" ... "All you care about is money. This city deserves a better class of criminal... and I'm gonna give it to them." ... "Tonight, you're all gonna be part of a social experiment." ... "What were you trying to prove? That deep down... everyone's as ugly as you? You're alone." So Matthew understood it. I believe that lack of ability to understand subtle cues or intuit esoteric/circumstantial meaning or unspoken commonly understood tropes and social understandings, etc, is a common symptom of autism. So I believe that may be the reason his reviews are often frustratingly lacking in that kind of perspective.