The biggest number I can think of is 7. Prove me wrong.
@hanhuang7263Сағат бұрын
Mathematician will be spending decades in a Italy prison
@andruss20014 сағат бұрын
Thanks! It looks to me like wave function is a placeholder for a collapsed object. Say if collapsed Schrodinger is found dead, then his entangled cat right away will be found alive.
@theDantr4864 сағат бұрын
WHY?!?!?!?!?!?! THERE'S NO REASON TO BREAK SPAGHETTI
@shunlunwong26305 сағат бұрын
Looking back it'll be the most dangerous message you can send in entire human history. Sending our current locaiton out of the wild universe......
@WThroat5 сағат бұрын
I’m assuming it’s not that scientist were necessarily stumped, but couldn’t prove or examine properly how since this would literally just be newtons 3rd law. I guessed that the force from if breaking is what did it and I ain’t no scientist
@qhebokasumi62237 сағат бұрын
Hey guys, Spirit of the law here..
@robsin28109 сағат бұрын
The energy to create one, would be unbelievable…
@aaqilplays9 сағат бұрын
"When you snap a spaghetti stick from its ends," "The Italians would get mad"
@allisarsh79999 сағат бұрын
bayashi be laughing in the corner
@rjunior079214 сағат бұрын
Great! and now what do we do with this info! 🧐
@plkrishh15 сағат бұрын
Very well explained
@scottgreen380715 сағат бұрын
Try thinking of it this way. Time does not exist just in your imagination. Instead the universe is an on going balance between change and persistence you think of as now. Now is an ongoing adjustment that far far in the past made some adjustments so that neither the multiverse nor fine tuning took over just as persistence and change acts. One depends on the other and neither can dominate so that what we have is the singular instantiation of one universe. Like that?
@kevinlee59715 сағат бұрын
Not so surprised.. is it Fourier transformation and projecting onto a shpere?
@BrandonPerez-hz8od15 сағат бұрын
Bro just snap it in the middle. I am beyond everybody's brain level 💪👽🤳
@-waffles--16 сағат бұрын
Nah, cause she just casually broke that shit in 2 at the end
@kenzieimmanuelhaposanhutag762416 сағат бұрын
"Why did you try to solve the most usless thing in life?" "𝕚 𝕨𝕒𝕤 𝕓𝕠𝕣𝕖𝕕" 💀
@CrowMagnum18 сағат бұрын
Gears would have been a helpful demo
@pelasgeuspelasgeus463421 сағат бұрын
It's really hilarious that you compare negative numbers and imaginary numbers. And you got a degree in math? Really now?
@Zebrahead200022 сағат бұрын
Earth bending Fire bending Air bending Water bending Spaghetti bending.
@kesavatadipatri907822 сағат бұрын
Reminds me of the ancient parable of six blind men going to an elephant and the first one who felt the leg said that it is like a pillar or tree. The second one who felt the tusk said that it is like a spear. The third one who felt the trunk said that it is like a thick rope or python or thick hose. The fourth one who felt the ear said that it is like a fan or carpet or a small blanket. The fifth one who felt the body said that it is like a wall. The sixth one who felt the tail said that it is like a small rope or a broom or a small snake. Note one should not be in denial of the other. It is a joinder. It is not good to describe each great historian/logician like one of those six blind men. The number is a qualifier. There is thorough mix-up between qualifier/qualification and property. A qualifier is external to an object and the property is internal to the object. There is tremendous whole world of view about it, which can not be described here. The qualifier can qualify many things and is not exclusive. The property is exclusive even if applied to many. For example take a red rose and a red apple. Though both are red, the redness of the rose is unique to the rose and the redness of the apple is unique to the apple. Even within the same family, the redness of one rose is its own and the redness of another is its own. Since the number is not a property, it is not exclusive. The qualifier, which is external is not exclusive. The property, which is internal, is exclusive. You are creating confusion (or someone else did it) by asking “is it one pair of shoes or two shoes?”. Note that I said that the number is a qualifier. A qualifier can qualify a qualification also. Thus pairness is qualifying the shoes. In “one pair of shoes”, the number one is qualifying the pair. In “two shoes”, the number two is qualifying the shoes. Same thing for the deck of cards as well. The properties are of two kinds. Those, which last the entire duration of the object and those which do not. For example A banana can be green and then become yellow and then black, each color lasting for some time. But the banananess lasts its entire existence. In both the cases, the property can not be separated from the object.
@rihardcisar696123 сағат бұрын
IT'S NOT A "SPAGHETTI STICK". IT'S A SPAGHETTO!
@ayushgupta7937Күн бұрын
So you are saying we can map 3d shapes with a 2d representation without any overlapping
@user-ui1lq5gy3eКүн бұрын
Indian😎 : snap it from the middle
@Andiiik7Күн бұрын
The singular if spaghetti is spaghetto
@user-if9qj6bz1jКүн бұрын
But can it be explained using event space?
@johnodo764Күн бұрын
Thumbs down.
@emmerald4744Күн бұрын
Italians must be having a stoke.
@aboght5Күн бұрын
it's called spaghetto the plural is spaghetti
@Sivvanna__xXКүн бұрын
Cut with scissors 😂
@danmtg_5007Күн бұрын
We should be thinking ways to cleans the earth... Mathematicians: "why does pasta do this?!?"
@ems951Күн бұрын
u are awesome
@labCmais135Күн бұрын
Are you rolling new lumpy objects? When will we see a new video? Hoping all is well
@handsome_man69Күн бұрын
Do you have a boyfriend?
@xcxydКүн бұрын
SHE DID IT AT THE ENDDD
@QermaqКүн бұрын
Sounds really cool, and nice hair!
@Supermariojulian632Күн бұрын
I did that in 2 minutes
@lukas23462Күн бұрын
All these scientists be violating Italians for decades now💀💀
@gavinrice6873Күн бұрын
NO FERMATI CHE STAI FACENDO QUELLO È UN PECCATO MAMMA MIA STAI FUORI DALL'ITALIA STREGA CATTIVA
@CharlesSmith-io9fpКүн бұрын
This is just nit picking but you said it's hard to measure the distance around a wheel. Agreed. You then said they didn't have measuring tapes, so mark a point on the wheel then put a mark on a flat surface then rotate the wheel one time and put another mark. Then measure the distance from point to point. If they don't have a measuring tape, what do they use? I ask this because it's incongruity day.
@HevenTerradoКүн бұрын
Italians watching this: 💀
@JonthefrogКүн бұрын
Istg I knew this before I ever had it mentioned to me
@jacobcallahan1080Күн бұрын
Why do people get paid to play with their food? And did physicists ever figure out that you can place your hands closer together to snap spaghetti more evenly? XD
@allengoodwin7043Күн бұрын
In a practical sense, its been figured out a long time. Because in the real world, there will always be a point where its not perfect but its close enough so as to be indistinguishable from the perfect.
@TheLevitatingChin2 күн бұрын
I can show you something even bigger than a reactor 😉
@michaellewis12092 күн бұрын
Why do we accept complex illogical explanations that we cannot easily understand as truth? Einstein said that if your explanation needs an explanation, you probably do not understand the question? I disagree with your premise that math is a science. It is not a science, it is the language of science. Don’t blame the math for poor explanations. Blame the theory.
@user-if7kr5yu3n2 күн бұрын
That is a very nice, informative and easier explanation. Thank you very much... ❤❤❤
Пікірлер
The biggest number I can think of is 7. Prove me wrong.
Mathematician will be spending decades in a Italy prison
Thanks! It looks to me like wave function is a placeholder for a collapsed object. Say if collapsed Schrodinger is found dead, then his entangled cat right away will be found alive.
WHY?!?!?!?!?!?! THERE'S NO REASON TO BREAK SPAGHETTI
Looking back it'll be the most dangerous message you can send in entire human history. Sending our current locaiton out of the wild universe......
I’m assuming it’s not that scientist were necessarily stumped, but couldn’t prove or examine properly how since this would literally just be newtons 3rd law. I guessed that the force from if breaking is what did it and I ain’t no scientist
Hey guys, Spirit of the law here..
The energy to create one, would be unbelievable…
"When you snap a spaghetti stick from its ends," "The Italians would get mad"
bayashi be laughing in the corner
Great! and now what do we do with this info! 🧐
Very well explained
Try thinking of it this way. Time does not exist just in your imagination. Instead the universe is an on going balance between change and persistence you think of as now. Now is an ongoing adjustment that far far in the past made some adjustments so that neither the multiverse nor fine tuning took over just as persistence and change acts. One depends on the other and neither can dominate so that what we have is the singular instantiation of one universe. Like that?
Not so surprised.. is it Fourier transformation and projecting onto a shpere?
Bro just snap it in the middle. I am beyond everybody's brain level 💪👽🤳
Nah, cause she just casually broke that shit in 2 at the end
"Why did you try to solve the most usless thing in life?" "𝕚 𝕨𝕒𝕤 𝕓𝕠𝕣𝕖𝕕" 💀
Gears would have been a helpful demo
It's really hilarious that you compare negative numbers and imaginary numbers. And you got a degree in math? Really now?
Earth bending Fire bending Air bending Water bending Spaghetti bending.
Reminds me of the ancient parable of six blind men going to an elephant and the first one who felt the leg said that it is like a pillar or tree. The second one who felt the tusk said that it is like a spear. The third one who felt the trunk said that it is like a thick rope or python or thick hose. The fourth one who felt the ear said that it is like a fan or carpet or a small blanket. The fifth one who felt the body said that it is like a wall. The sixth one who felt the tail said that it is like a small rope or a broom or a small snake. Note one should not be in denial of the other. It is a joinder. It is not good to describe each great historian/logician like one of those six blind men. The number is a qualifier. There is thorough mix-up between qualifier/qualification and property. A qualifier is external to an object and the property is internal to the object. There is tremendous whole world of view about it, which can not be described here. The qualifier can qualify many things and is not exclusive. The property is exclusive even if applied to many. For example take a red rose and a red apple. Though both are red, the redness of the rose is unique to the rose and the redness of the apple is unique to the apple. Even within the same family, the redness of one rose is its own and the redness of another is its own. Since the number is not a property, it is not exclusive. The qualifier, which is external is not exclusive. The property, which is internal, is exclusive. You are creating confusion (or someone else did it) by asking “is it one pair of shoes or two shoes?”. Note that I said that the number is a qualifier. A qualifier can qualify a qualification also. Thus pairness is qualifying the shoes. In “one pair of shoes”, the number one is qualifying the pair. In “two shoes”, the number two is qualifying the shoes. Same thing for the deck of cards as well. The properties are of two kinds. Those, which last the entire duration of the object and those which do not. For example A banana can be green and then become yellow and then black, each color lasting for some time. But the banananess lasts its entire existence. In both the cases, the property can not be separated from the object.
IT'S NOT A "SPAGHETTI STICK". IT'S A SPAGHETTO!
So you are saying we can map 3d shapes with a 2d representation without any overlapping
Indian😎 : snap it from the middle
The singular if spaghetti is spaghetto
But can it be explained using event space?
Thumbs down.
Italians must be having a stoke.
it's called spaghetto the plural is spaghetti
Cut with scissors 😂
We should be thinking ways to cleans the earth... Mathematicians: "why does pasta do this?!?"
u are awesome
Are you rolling new lumpy objects? When will we see a new video? Hoping all is well
Do you have a boyfriend?
SHE DID IT AT THE ENDDD
Sounds really cool, and nice hair!
I did that in 2 minutes
All these scientists be violating Italians for decades now💀💀
NO FERMATI CHE STAI FACENDO QUELLO È UN PECCATO MAMMA MIA STAI FUORI DALL'ITALIA STREGA CATTIVA
This is just nit picking but you said it's hard to measure the distance around a wheel. Agreed. You then said they didn't have measuring tapes, so mark a point on the wheel then put a mark on a flat surface then rotate the wheel one time and put another mark. Then measure the distance from point to point. If they don't have a measuring tape, what do they use? I ask this because it's incongruity day.
Italians watching this: 💀
Istg I knew this before I ever had it mentioned to me
Why do people get paid to play with their food? And did physicists ever figure out that you can place your hands closer together to snap spaghetti more evenly? XD
In a practical sense, its been figured out a long time. Because in the real world, there will always be a point where its not perfect but its close enough so as to be indistinguishable from the perfect.
I can show you something even bigger than a reactor 😉
Why do we accept complex illogical explanations that we cannot easily understand as truth? Einstein said that if your explanation needs an explanation, you probably do not understand the question? I disagree with your premise that math is a science. It is not a science, it is the language of science. Don’t blame the math for poor explanations. Blame the theory.
That is a very nice, informative and easier explanation. Thank you very much... ❤❤❤
*Italians died in the making of this video.*
or just do it under water