Пікірлер

• 
  @arjundebnath49553 күн бұрын

  Who in 2024

• 
  @waluigihentailover69263 күн бұрын

  What an awesome art style!

• 
  @HamdouchiAbdelilah-hf1iw5 күн бұрын

  I have seen this information in app simulation called cell evolution so thats why I watched this video

• 
  @Sr_Foxyxd8 күн бұрын

  el simbolo n@c i al principio

• 
  @laurajaramillo86869 күн бұрын

  Alguien que mandé un resumen bueno

• 
  @jimfoard567110 күн бұрын

  Much has been said by historians of Darwin's observations of the finches on the Galapagos islands while sailing on the Beagle, but little is mentioned of another incident Darwin had with some less fortunate birds on a different island during his voyage. We have three accounts of an excursion made by Darwin and the Captain from the Beagle to St. Paul's Rocks between the Cape Verde Islands and the coast of Brazil. First we shall read Darwin's version of the episode: " We found on St. Paul's only two kinds of birds-the booby and the noddy. The former is a species of Gannet, and the latter a tern. Both are of a tame and stupid disposition, and are so unaccustomed to visitors, that I could have killed any number of them with my geologic hammer." The Voyage of Charles Darwin, Charles Darwin, pp.10, The American Museum of Natural History, The Natural History Library, Anchor Books, Doubleday & Co., Inc., Garden City New York, 1962. Browne mentioned the appalling incident in her biography of Darwin: " Uninhabited except for dense flocks of seafowl, and previously unvisited by any scientific recorder, they were an alluring target for a restless naval man and an eager friend . . . Darwin and Fitzroy had a marvelous time of it, whooping and killing birds with abandon". Browne, pp.204. See also the original, Narrative of the Surveying Voyage of H.M.S. Adventure and Beagle, Vol. 2:56. Fitzroy recorded the bloody scene in his personal narrative as well. According to him, one of the seamen asked if he could borrow Darwin's hammer to kill some of the birds with, to which Darwin replied, "No, no, you'll break the handle." Then, apparently struck by the novelty of this idea, Darwin himself picked up his hammer and began killing the peaceful birds in this manner, as Fitzroy related "away went the hammer, with all the force of his own right arm." Narrative of the Voyages of the Adventure and Beagle, by Admiral Fitzroy, 1839. See also Amabel Williams Ellis, "The Voyage of the Beagle, Adapted from the Narratives and letters of Charles Darwin and Captain Fitzroy, pp. 26, J.B. Lippencott Co., Philadelphia and London, 1931.

• 
  @jimfoard567110 күн бұрын

  There are thousands of evolutionist sites out there attempting to debunk the idea of Biblical Creation. Creationism must be anti science and only believed in by backwoods fundamentalist Christian hicks who hate science and are usually the snake handler kind who marry their first cousins. I'm curious though; if there is this vast, overwhelming amount of evidence for evolution, and it is an incontrovertible fact of science as much as the laws of voltage, current and resistance in electricity, then why do evolutionists feel so compelled to prove such an obvious occurrence if it is as plain as the nose on your face everywhere we go. I mean, people would not ordinarily go to such great lengths to prove that eggs exist, or that bark grows on trees or that grass is green, but you have this strange obsession to prove evolution, which is odd since wasn't it Darwin who supposedly proved it over 100 years ago? Why the rush to prove something over and over again and again and again if it's already staring you in the face? It's sort of like saying "I've just found out that cars in America travel on the right side of the road! And they use rubber wheels and have steering wheels to guide them." It just seems to be a bit of overkill, this redundant zeal to go about proving something that has already been proven beyond a shadow of a doubt. Is this much ado about nothing, or am I missing something here? Is Darwin's theory that humans descended from apes really some profound philosophic concept that takes years of deep thought and meditation to figure out, like a Buddhist monk contemplating a Zen koan? Or is the concept of evolution merely the rehashing of an old Epicurean philosophical, materialistic creation story; is the Origin of Species overrated; is it in essence a simple collection of Just So Stories and Aesop Fables that has been blown way out of proportion from it's actual value by it's adherents, while evolution has been enshrined as a sort of religious dogma. Darwin has reached the status of philosopher-sage among evolutionists; he is the only figure in modern history besides the Pope among Catholics and Joseph Smith among Mormons who's decrees and pronouncements are not to be questioned (especially by those pesky, science hating Creationists); Darwin is above any peer review, while his Origin is regarded as sacred script; as infallible among evolutionists as the King James Bible is to Fundamentalists. But, then again, what do I know? What are the striking aspects of Darwin's theory that impresses people so much? I must be the simplest among simpletons not to have grasped the obvious and profound, amazing and historical revelations of Darwin's history changing work.

• 
  @Krash-22211 күн бұрын

  Only watching this cause of orphan black lol

• 
  @RafaDiaz-rh1jh13 күн бұрын

  XD aquí lo de 2024👌

• 
  @damiangonzalezb17 күн бұрын

  Que un chileno no vea esto, minuto 0:33. ¿Ya lo viste?🤡

• 
  @ameliasalazar624919 күн бұрын

  Si me la ponieron en naturales

• 
  @hojo62419 күн бұрын

  Hola seño sandra 👋👋👋 10-2

• 
  @KASSIELANGELYZUMARANSUAREZ20 күн бұрын

  muy divertido

• 
  @EXPERIMENTOSMAURICIO20 күн бұрын

  ❤

• 
  @TiagoMoraescezario-f3s21 күн бұрын

  Bcjjcckbcj

• 
  @anabelentorres364325 күн бұрын

  Yo tambien estoy aqui por la tarea jajaja😅😊😊

• 
  @graemeyetts346527 күн бұрын

  What influence did Galapagos ' very strange flora and fauna have on Darwins' thinking? Did it HINDER or HELP his enquiries? Just a thought from someone who has a basic amateur understanding of genetics.

• 
  @samirasilva729528 күн бұрын

  Yo exposición

• 
  @marialorenadebernardo3020Ай бұрын

  lo odio

• 
  @janahiaracelliseminario2199Ай бұрын

  siiiii

• 
  @RodrigoMirraАй бұрын

  Muy bien hecho el video

• 
  @LuisaCamayoocoroАй бұрын

  Si

• 
  @juhanlucas6482Ай бұрын

  Átomos moléculas matéria =Química

• 
  @mariasarayema7733Ай бұрын

  Me lo pidieron para ciencias naturales

• 
  @mariasarayema7733Ай бұрын

  Yooo

• 
  @LXCAS._1991Ай бұрын

  Yo vine por la prueba/examen

• 
  @jonathanlara6678Ай бұрын

  Yo

• 
  @emmamariadelsocorromayciau1405Ай бұрын

  Tengo examen mañana

• 
  @emmamariadelsocorromayciau1405Ай бұрын

  Ola

• 
  @JulianmejiahernandezАй бұрын

  No le entiendo nada 😒😒

• 
  @OtonielAlarconHuertaАй бұрын

  Yo por examen lo peor no es cierto

• 
  @JorgeYanez-zi6juАй бұрын

  Te odio

• 
  @AidenTyson-em6duАй бұрын

  w

• 
  @Artrix-oh2 ай бұрын

  who is here because of science class 🥲

• 
  @amandaagudelorojas87502 ай бұрын

  O por tarea

• 
  @MiMundoAnimal4612 ай бұрын

  1:55 yo cuando aprendo una nueva palabra.😅😂

• 
  @Manguitoplayz2 ай бұрын

  "Homo QUE?!?!?"

• 
  @user-iw4ju7tt6u2 ай бұрын

  Me ago rico con caca 😂😂😂😂😂 por la ernegiA xd

• 
  @INVAS0RXD2 ай бұрын

  Like si tu profe te lo mando pa la tarea

• 
  @ma.rtelex25052 ай бұрын

  Profe ximena pq nos hace ver esto

• 
  @gimenarodriguez44492 ай бұрын

  Yo

• 
  @alexpineres9692 ай бұрын

  La piedra es piedra 🙄

• 
  @pedrodavidarevalohuipan56362 ай бұрын

  Yo

• 
  @NOSE-c6k2 ай бұрын

  TENGOO QUE APRENDER TODO DE 5TO EN UN MES

• 
  @user-gs4dv8uk5l2 ай бұрын

  Like si tus papas te abandonaron

• 
  @OscarMancilla-ih3yg2 ай бұрын

  Tengo examen😢

• 
  @iud3iueieueeuei2 ай бұрын

  Si por la tarea

• 
  @rudaa_bs2 ай бұрын

  yo .vea

• 
  @BritneySalomeOrtizCastillo2 ай бұрын

  Todos aqui por la tarea de ciencias naturales

• 
  @djkos79082 ай бұрын

  Fue mi pene😂😂😂😂😮❤❤