I will never understand why people don’t like innovation in vacuum technology like Dyson consistently does, they love brands that never improve their product line and often collect old junk and recommend products that use old dated technology that’s bad for the environment as well as wasteful.
@VacuumFacts10 сағат бұрын
It's a combination of tribalism, lack of education, and lack of critical thinking. Those afflicted congregate into the 'vacuum enthusiast' community online, which are pretty rabid. It was their vitriol that inspired me to make this channel as a counter.
@Im_Finessed3 күн бұрын
I was able to get the v15 detect extra from Best Buy for $549. Very happy and a great deal
@danieli86954 күн бұрын
You have a very nice voice but I find your accent difficult to understand. Would it be helpful to add written text?
@VacuumFacts4 күн бұрын
You're welcome to translate into writing, upload to a location of your choice, and post a link here for other people, if you're as passionate as you sound.
@brye5156 күн бұрын
I’ve had dysons for years. Got tired of cleaning filters and pulling all the bits apart to clean. Never mind the junk battery with Dyson! Got the Henry and wouldn’t look back. All dust is trapped in the bag that also acts as a filter. Cleans better. Only downside I can find is that it is slightly heavier but hardly noticeable and I can sacrifice this as it’s almost half the price of Dyson. I would 100% recommend the Henry all day long!
@VacuumFacts6 күн бұрын
Something's wrong then. The filters shouldn't get that dirty. It's possible to go for months without needing to rinse it, e.g. kzread.info/dash/bejne/hmek1LqLXcTLf8o.html without issues or loss of performance. You don't need to pull any bits apart to clean. In fact, you don't need to clean it. What were you doing with it? The major downsides of the Henry design you glossed over are evidenced clearly in all the reviews. It's also completely false they clean better and there is hard data for that. You also, unsurprisingly, didn't mention which model of either machine you were talking about.
@rileyreid89296 күн бұрын
amazing review
@boogietronix10 күн бұрын
If you have mainly hard surfaces, you absolutely want the fluffy head. It does not throw nearly as much debris as the motorbar. Our dogs shed a lot and bring in a tonne of dust and the fluffy head does a way better job on hardwood and laminate. I am due for a new Dyson and would not consider only having a motorbar. It does work amazingly on carpet though!
@VacuumFacts10 күн бұрын
The motorbar doesn't throw debris under real-world usage. There's also no evidence one performs better than another in real-world situations. People may subjectively 'feel' otherwise and like it more though.
@boogietronix10 күн бұрын
@@VacuumFactsNo, in the five years I've been using both on a weekly basis it's 'fact' that the fluffy head works better on hard surfaces and throws less debris. I don't have a video to back it up, just countless weeks of using both heads and experimenting lol
@VacuumFacts10 күн бұрын
That conflicts with my experience and direct, real-world representative measurements. Go figure.
@VacuumFacts10 күн бұрын
>> "@VacuumFacts Fair enough, though I think this video does a better job than yours of comparing the two heads; kzread.info/dash/bejne/qaVhpMmYcdasadI.html" My video doesn't attempt to compare the heads under real-world representative conditions. This was explicitly stated in the video description. This was just a silly entertainment video to appease that audience. The video you pointed to also doesn't show meaningful real-world representative conditions. Worse, it doesn't state that and implies it's a meaningful comparison. And, almost a moot point, but the head being used in that video is a much, much older design without the gates of the more recent head, so obviously it's not going to work as well for large particles-that's why that old head was updated. So, to conclude that video "does a better job than yours of comparing the two heads" is absurd on many levels when you break it down and look beyond the cosmetic. The reality is, under real-world representative conditions, both heads do comparable jobs. One is just more practical to use in mixed-flooring homes.
@ryr63510 күн бұрын
Great highlighting crucial points and differences. I never knew such improvements were made on the v15 so I'm definitely getting their top model. Your a great Dyson enthusiast!
@VacuumFacts10 күн бұрын
It's a disgrace there's nowhere on the internet, let alone YT where you can find that out either. If you want a job doing right... The Gen5 advancements are covered in its review as well. The next model looks to substantially revolutionise many areas as well, whenever it's released. Also, I'm not a "Dyson enthusiast"; I'm a technology enthusiast. It just happens that Dyson are the only one pushing the technology and so get all the attention. The rest just copy at the customers' expense.
@frickhelm10 күн бұрын
Hello. I think you underestimate the change of the nylon bristles a bit : it makes a big difference with more dense pile. I am currently testing the dyson lineup from the gen5 down to the v8 and especially with the v8 using the gen5 head it makes a huge difference in performance (i am testing with certified test dust - the same used in IEC standard). Also the v15 is performing better with the gen5 head - but it performs also better while just using the gen5 brush. Sadly dyson made some changes in the diameter and the length of the brushes so you experience some rattle noise while using it with the v15 head (at least the one i have - its from the first batches delivered). I would recommend to use the gen5 head with every older model (if it will ever be available to buy - current situation really sucks regarding replacement parts). Sadly you can not use the older brushes (lenght is different, diameter is different and the front cap at the brushmotor changed) with the gen5 head to gather more data or use the older cleaning heads with the gen5 due to the minor connector change (at least not without modifying the older ones). I made a video about the results of the gen5 and v8 - usually i am doing more vacuum robot related stuff. Regards
@VacuumFacts10 күн бұрын
Please can you evidence and quantify “the change of the nylon bristles”? Presumably you mean wear. If you didn’t, then it’s not clear what you’re talking about, why it’s meaningful, or how you’ve concluded I’ve ‘underestimated the change of the nylon bristles’. I’ve reviewed your test methodology and it is not satisfactory to draw any convincing conclusions from it. The most obvious problems I noticed were that • You didn’t specify carpet backing type; its porosity strongly determines results. • You didn’t say how you controlled distribution of test dust to ensure homogeneity. • You simply pressed down on the test dust, which doesn’t simulate fibre motion and representative embedding, and why controlled brushing is better. • You showed variable numbers of passes over same area to collect datapoints, particularly in later passes (e.g. V8 with Gen5 head), which is clearly unrepresentative. I’ve not yet seen any other source on YT which doesn’t suffer from obvious issues with testing methodology.
@micear842415 күн бұрын
This guy has obviously never used a Central vac!, what a twat. Central vacs have 3-5 times the cleaning power of portables and the biggest selling feature is they exhaust any dust or particles that escape the bag,filter or cyclone outside your home. Nothing beats having a central vac system. If you did your research you'd know they are highly recommended by Drs for those who suffer from allergies and asthma.
@VacuumFacts15 күн бұрын
This guy has obviously never watched the video...
@sosukewifhat16 күн бұрын
very thorough review, i'm surprised we can still find quality content like this on youtube, thanks a lot !!
@VacuumFacts15 күн бұрын
Me too. It's very disturbing how YT has evolved. It's a regressively capitalist machine now.
@tuanl734816 күн бұрын
I don't know if you're even gonna read this, and i'm not even the type of person who comments on videos, but I have to put this here. Thank you so much for everything you do on this channel. Just got myself a v12 origin and within the first few days, i've already done almost all the things that you aren't supposed to do with it (wiping the bin seals, trying to "deep clean" it since it sucks out so much dirt in my space,...) partly because I thought a dyson would require as much maintainance as other vacuums thanks to other vacuum review channels before finding out about your channel. Not only did I learn so much about how to properly use a dyson, all my questions regarding the vacuum are also answered, namely the way the cyclones work, how often we need to wash the filter, how dyson seperate dirt and the engineering feats of dyson vacuums overall. Before this I was quite interested in vacuum tech and have used a couple of other vacuums from China cause they're cheap and available in my country, it is fascinating to find out about all the tech in a dyson via your coherent, clear and understandable way, simply incredible. Too bad this isn't the gold standard of how you review stuff on the internet, i've fallen for quite a lot of shit people circulating around just because they use their vacuums inappropriately and blame the technology for not working as expected, i've also took a look at your comments and the fact you're clarifying all the facts and all the propaganda that people throw in till this day using hard, evidence based tests and measurements is amazing, love it. This platform needs more people like you, thank you for what you do and for answering all my questions, I hope you can keep doing this cause the impact of you is real, at least to me. Cheers!
@VacuumFacts16 күн бұрын
I still have new educational videos planned for this channel...eventually. If more manufacturers innovated, there'd be more review videos. Sadly, they just clone on the cheap at the customers' expense or peddle useless gimmicks.
@tuanl734816 күн бұрын
@@VacuumFacts It's refreshing to see a channel that just stop doing reviews, yet still actively supports viewers when there's no actually new product coming out, instead of milking every single inferior releases from other companies over and over. After using my Dyson, I have to say currently, they are clearly light years ahead of the competition (if you can even call it competition). Hopefully some interesting stuff happens in the future. By the way, is it normal for the filters to have light fraying on the non-HEPA part, and is it by design choice that the wand and other attachments are slightly loose when connected to the vacuum ?
@VacuumFacts16 күн бұрын
Yes, the premotor filter is essentially a bunch of fibres, so they become frayed with rinses. But they still filter fine. The 'looseness' is mechanical spring that good design incorporates to minimise fracture chance. Many people (usually Dyson brand haters) wrongly conclude it's bad. It's actually good and they're still sealed.
@tuanl734816 күн бұрын
@@VacuumFacts Exactly as I thought, thanks for the answer it really saved me a headache. Now onto binge watching the rest of your videos lol
@megatronskneecap19 күн бұрын
Propaganda.
@VacuumFacts19 күн бұрын
What is? The evidence-supported facts presented? Someone sounds like they don't like reality. :/
@megatronskneecap19 күн бұрын
@@VacuumFacts Reality from what your independent home testing that's not in a lab and has no real actual science to back it up? You're having a laugh mate. And don't get me started about calling other machines clones and then claiming that they don't match the Dyson in performance and don't look like it what's so ever. Utter waffling and misleading consumers from your end. Shameful behaviour.
@VacuumFacts19 күн бұрын
The testing I do is not to the same statistical rigour of industry standard testing, but does not suffer from the flaws seen in all other bedroom testing seen on YT. It shows a fairly representative relative comparison that is fully in line with a) expectations from known science and what would be expected (see all other videos on my channel), and b) with evidence formally acquired from industry standard testing. You simply haven't a made a case here. And then there's everything else in the review glossed over.
@megatronskneecap19 күн бұрын
@@VacuumFacts My case is you're a self proclaimed Dyson biased superfan (thank you for clarifying in previous comments, makes my case and point work a lot easier) which while fine doesn't translate to the unbiased review that this should be. Do you mention obvious undeniable flaws in the machine (and there many) yes. Do you give fair marks to the competition and even possibly recommend other machines from different brands? No. That's what a REVIEW is for. Pointing out the pros and cons of a machine and taking the cons and formulating possible other options for the cons for consumers. People like MKBHD, one of the most notable tech reviewers on the platform wouldn't be nearly as good as 16M subscribers worth of success if he didn't do this extremely basic practice. People that have been collecting vacuums and testing them personally has a hobby since their childhood like Parwaz786 who is also somewhat of a Dyson fan points out that this machine is lacking in build quality and general good brownie points you want on a machine that nearly costs as much as a high-range television. Also, if you know and accept that the tests you do are quote "bedroom-like" your channel shouldn't be plastered and even video water marked in "vacuum facts" like it's a general facts channel on the entire topic rather than a few home tests by a Dyson superfan judging new machines.
@VacuumFacts18 күн бұрын
>>”you're a self-proclaimed Dyson biased superfan” What evidence have you relied on to conclude this? Please share it. I have stated the exact opposite on more occasions than I can remember now. >> “Do you mention obvious undeniable flaws in the machine (and there many) yes.” Pity then you didn’t mention and then evidence a single one in a manner consistent with your very own criticisms. Makes you look very hypocritical. >> “Do you give fair marks to the competition and even possibly recommend other machines from different brands?” What does that even mean? “Fair marks to the competition”? This is a relative comparison. What was observed was reported. I don’t even recommend the Dyson machine; I simply stated the facts. People can make their own minds up. Not sure how you missed this or why you appear offended. >> “That's what a REVIEW is for.” You have a bizarre and warped idea of what a review is. This review is a review of the facts and the full truth. Technologically, there’s little to criticise relative to the competition. >> “Parwaz786 who is also somewhat of a Dyson fan points out that this machine is lacking in build quality” That person is an entertainer and provides little in the way of credible testing or facts of a nature within the remit of this channel. You also failed to explain what “lacking in build quality” even means, let alone evidence it. You carry no credibility and are being very hypocritical. >> “your channel shouldn't be plastered and even video water marked in "vacuum facts" like it's a general facts channel” The watermark is to stamp my content. The name reflects that I present the facts and full truth. Plenty of evidence of that on my channel. >> “by a Dyson superfan judging new machines.” That you think I’m a Dyson (the company) superfan automatically leaves you without credibility. I care about technology on this channel and only the best I can identify, which, like it or not, comes from Dyson at the moment. Sorry it offends your apparently tribal worldview. You’ve spouted much here but provided the same level of substance from all the similar whiny voices I’ve become bored with in the past-namely zero.
@PsychedOut..19 күн бұрын
I don’t suppose you have an opinion on the V15 total clean vs the V15 absolute, do you? I’m really struggling to find the difference between them and Dyson customer service have been no help at all. I’m trying to decide between the 2. I’ve found deals on both so there’s not much difference in price. Will the battery on the absolute be enough to vacuum an average 3 bed semi-detached house? I’ve read some reviews saying the battery is appalling and given the price I want to ensure I’m making the right decision.
@VacuumFacts19 күн бұрын
Dyson customer service have become very, very poor recently (as of mid 2024) and lets down the entire company. The total clean is the higher end product, whose only difference is that it comes with more tools-most notably the anti-hair screw tool, which is pretty core. I'd also add the Gen5 is much better still, and the next product looks to be quite radically different, whenever it's released (maybe next year).
@PsychedOut..19 күн бұрын
@@VacuumFacts I’m glad you mentioned the customer service because I’ve found the same thing. My wife and daughter have Dyson hairdryers, when my wife had an issue end of last year they were great but we called 2 weeks ago about my daughter’s and they were utterly useless. It’s a real shame, given it’s a premium product, good CS should be an area in which they excel. Thanks for the reply, very helpful!
@VacuumFacts19 күн бұрын
Their customer service used to be truly excellent. Replacement of modular parts no questions asked. Now it's a joke and others have described the utter shambles it is now and the miserable experience you have to endure if something goes wrong. What a genuine shame. Technologically, they are unsurpassed or even approached.
@davidelliott301919 күн бұрын
I am 73 years old. Over all these years I have owned many vacuum cleaners. I bought a Dyson V11 2 years ago at Costco on sale at $399.00. I had paid as much as $700.00 many years before and never had a vacuum cleaner near as good as this Dyson vacuum. I was a factory rep for a Carpet Mfg for 40 years and did inspections on carpet performance complaints. Many were vacuum cleaner-related. I would always inspect the customer's vacuum cleaner for problems. Beater bar issues were a significant cause of problems causing snags if there was a protruding problem on the bar. As far as Dysons go the carpet would stay looking new longer because the power in removing very small particles was superior. These particles act as a file on the fibers and dull the luster thus making traffic patterns more visible by a huge degree. Buy Dyson, you can't go wrong!
@VacuumFacts19 күн бұрын
They're engineered to be the best known how. The other manufacturers copy at the customers' expense to bypass the expensive R&D. Sadly, Dyson's customer service quality has fallen off a cliff recently. Not sure I agree that particles affect the lusture of carpet. It would depend on the carpet itself and abrasion by other materials will affect wear just as much.
@megatronskneecap20 күн бұрын
So, Dyson gets the victory yet Dyson has also been accused by consumers of the 90's to early teens "no loss of suction" claims to be false advertising?
@VacuumFacts20 күн бұрын
You seem to be confusing wild accusation with evidence supported facts.
@megatronskneecap20 күн бұрын
@@VacuumFacts It's not actually that wild. I just looked into it for a matter of five minutes and there are lawsuits from ORECK and bothered consumers that indicate to the false no loss of suction claims. One such article is from the guardian in 2007 where the NSA (which also looked into this case with Shark V Dyson) said that the No Loss of Suction claims from Dyson were untrue. My point is, this is a hypocritical move from Dyson although what Shark was trying to pull off was sketchy too. I just think that this video shines a limelight on Dyson that shouldn't really be there as they've been stuffed into the same corner for the same shady advertising and claims before.
@VacuumFacts20 күн бұрын
You seem to be confusing wild accusation with evidence supported facts.
@megatronskneecap20 күн бұрын
@@VacuumFacts You keep posting the same comment this time 10 minutes apart...
@VacuumFacts20 күн бұрын
Because it still applied. You continued to show no understanding of the distinction between clear, objective evidence and accusation.
@torchrrrr24 күн бұрын
Perfect video
@YamR1rider-wn9rf28 күн бұрын
Not a bad video at all....I will however say that if you've got some reasonable DIY skills its really not that hard to crack these open and give them a good cleanout. In my experience the internal cyclone/catchment area can and does contribute to the smell, despite your tests there. Breaking the vac down slightly and giving the area a clean and blowout with compressed air does help.
@VacuumFacts28 күн бұрын
I'm sure. But the whole point of the video is to explain why it's irrelevant to. It's not recommended by the manufacturer or designed to be broken apart. The things listed all but eliminate bad odours if you do them correctly.
@RyanSellman1Ай бұрын
The Dyson Ball Animal 3 is very similar to the UK Ball Animal 2, except it uses the same wand design as the DC41, and it has the hair removal vanes in the cleaner head, which I really like. It's an improvement over the US version of the Ball Animal 2, which is basically like the DC41 but with better suction and agitation.
@JimmyTechnologyАй бұрын
Would it be possible to review JIMMY mattress vacuum?
@VacuumFactsАй бұрын
If you can explain why its technology pushes the boundaries at a deep technical level relative to current leading technology and warrants attention on my channel. If you don't, convincingly, I'll assume it was some shady marketing comment and encourage everyone to avoid your products.
@RyanSellman1Ай бұрын
The Miele Blizzard's bagless design looks like total complete crap that you would see from a bagless vacuum in the early 2000's lol. Miele is generally known for having excellent filtration, but their claim of the Blizzard's lifetime filter being HEPA should be taken with a full shaker of salt.
@RyanSellman1Ай бұрын
11:46 It seems the 0.5 to 4.2 micron size range is referring to the separation efficiency of the Jet Cyclone technology. They don't say what size particles the filtration system can trap at 99.999% efficiency, but I highly doubt it's 0.3 microns or smaller.
@VacuumFactsАй бұрын
They very explicitly state it's the filtration performance of their machine following the IEC test standard using their boost mode (i.e. the best they can get). They capture 99.999% of particles to 0.5 µm in size (i.e. easy, huge boulders). It's not as impressive as it sounds, and they patronise the customer by hoping they are too ignorant of what all this means to see through their snake oil and inferiority relative to their better competitor's technology.
@RyanSellman1Ай бұрын
@@VacuumFacts Yeah I agree with you. It seems like the multi-cyclonic design's of Dyson's competitors doesn't quite match up to Dyson's Root Cyclone and Radial Root Cyclone technologies, and of course the Cinetic cyclones have no competition that can match it. I'm glad that I bought a Dyson for myself for Christmas lol
@RyanSellman1Ай бұрын
Filter Queen has been dethroned in the filtration category lol. Their filtration efficiency is 99.98% @ 0.1 microns, so seeing 99.99% efficiency from the Gen5 is amazing. If I can save up the money someday, I would love to get one.
@VacuumFactsАй бұрын
The Filter Queen does not specify the size range associated with their "99.98%" claim on their (broken and ugly) website. They don't even make the claim it's HEPA grade or whole machine HEPA filtered. Even their replacement filters page doesn't specify. It's almost certainly not therefore. Even their cordless stick vac, Dyson clone, bandwagon jump product claims to be HEPA filtered but fails to specify the size range and capture efficiency. These are not the hallmarks of a reputable product, as discussed in this very review video. There's nothing about their products as advertised or the way they work that's impressive at all. You'd be better saving up and getting the next model, which looks to be radically different from their current models.
@RyanSellman1Ай бұрын
@@VacuumFacts Lol they haven't changed the design of their Majestic vacuum in decades. I highly doubt they're going to change it.
@RyanSellman1Ай бұрын
@@VacuumFacts Yeah I just looked at their website and they don't specify their filtration efficiency. Weird.
@VacuumFactsАй бұрын
I don't think it's weird; they're a dodgy company. You'd withhold the full truth if you're trying to deceive potential customers.
@RyanSellman1Ай бұрын
@@VacuumFacts True. That and they expect people to pay $1,499 for the vacuum and $29.99 a year for their basic replacement filter package, and $79.98 a year for their premium filter replacement package. So in 5 years, $149.95 for the basic package, and $399.90 for the premium package. That's insane!
@amritanandpathak1112Ай бұрын
Hey I am a freelance video editor and animator from Nepal. I have experties in editing videos related to tech reviews. Would you consider giving me a chance to work with you? If yes then please give me a response.
@maxinegeorge6359Ай бұрын
Right out of the box, our Dyson Gen5Absolute had a rattle in the carpet cleaning head. Customer service conceded that the part is out of stock with no date for when it will be available (this is a HUGE problem with Dyson), so the unit had to be replaced. Dyson offered to ship us an exchange as soon as UPS received the defective unit. We recorded this conversation. Nevertheless, the next day, after we delivered the defective unit to UPS, customer service informed us that this was untrue. Dyson would not do an immediate exchange, but would ship a new unit only after it received and processed the unit, which would take up to 3 weeks (while Dyson sat on our money and the warranty triggered by our initial purchase continued to run.) In short, Dyson lied. I asked to speak with a supervisor and was assured that supervisor would call me back. No call. Dyson lied again. Even before we bought the unit, we got a bad taste of Dyson’s honesty. Customer service assured us that Dyson would price-match QVC’s sale price. This, too, proved to be untrue. Yet another lie. The vacuum may be great, but beware of Dyson. False assurances and unavailable replacement parts are a REAL problem.
@VacuumFactsАй бұрын
This is actually something commonly observed now, and I fully believe absolutely everything you say. Dyson's 'award winning' customer service has fallen right off a cliff somehow and is utterly terrible now. Whoever is responsible for that division needs firing. You hit the nail on the head when you say "The vacuum may be great, but beware of Dyson". People who hate the facts I present have falsely claimed I'm a biased fanboy for years. Yet even I now would strongly recommend anyone think at least twice before buying any Dyson product, because the after-sales service (as of mid 2024) is truly dire, frustrating, and very very poor. I'd love to see what the rabid vacuum enthusiasts thought of that statement.
@RyanSellman1Ай бұрын
@@VacuumFacts They definitely need to address their customer service issues. That's going to hurt them in the long run, because people aren't going to invest in a high quality Dyson vacuum if they don't think that the company is going to back it up. I hope they resolve that problem soon.
@hurubi14 күн бұрын
@@VacuumFacts Do think its wise to buy additional coverage?
@VacuumFacts14 күн бұрын
@@hurubi For what? Like those insurance offers. I've always thought they were a scam. Even out of warranty, you can get any spare modular parts for their cost value if ever needed. Additional coverage won't fix Dyson's spotty customer service now either.
@RyanSellman1Ай бұрын
I love how Samsung claims the Jet 90 has 27 cyclones, when there's actually only 9 cyclones with 3 openings for each cyclone for air to enter, but yet it clogged up in your flour pickup test, basically proving that their cheap knockoff of Dyson's Root Cyclone technology just doesn't match the separation efficiency that Dyson vacuums have. This reminds me of the "Do The Math" marketing Atari did for their Jaguar game console, claiming it had 64-bit graphics because it used 2 32-bit processors, but in reality, it wasn't 64 bit at all, compared to the Nintendo 64 game console.
@VacuumFactsАй бұрын
Yup. You've got to watch the marketing types and fact check their half-truths. And yet I'm called 'biased' for pointing out things like this by people who champion feelings over facts. It's also not the number of cyclones that's important. In fact, Dyson's next model is reducing the number of cyclones in operation depending on flow current in a given mode to maximise their effectiveness. Marketing assume people are very, very stupid (which, for the most part, is sadly true due to a total failure of the state to educate in critical thinking) and suggest 'more' and 'bigger' is automatically better. Using less to achieve more is really what's better.
@RyanSellman1Ай бұрын
@@VacuumFacts Oh yeah I heard about what they're planning for the new model. That's pretty smart, considering that on a low power mode, trying to distribute the lesser airflow throughout all of the cyclones would mean more fine dust gets through, so having it shut off some of the cyclones to adapt is very clever.
@mwgamer7559Ай бұрын
I love how you're showing the truth unlike many people on Yt. This technology is amazing and I wish Dyson had kept on innovating or at least sell them here in the Uk in 2024. I regret not buying one when they came out, but, I have gotten my hand on one that a family member owned and they washed the cyclones out (witch shouldn't be done) and they didn't let it dry properly yet it still works and performs amazing. Goes to show that Dysons are built to last even when some are abused. Great video btw.
@VacuumFactsАй бұрын
They discontinued it when moving to cordless for reasons discussed here kzread.info/dash/bejne/jGeBx8imedLaZrA.html
@meteora8888Ай бұрын
The issue I have with dyson apart from the price tag is the crappy build quality and materials used. They feel cheap, creak and are brittle.
@VacuumFactsАй бұрын
You claimed they had "crappy build quality and materials", then relied on 'feelings' instead of evidence to support your claim. Your feelings are opposite to reality. They use the most advanced polymers around and are evidenced beyond all reasonable doubt to be durable, especially relative to the competition (see all the official durability testing videos online for a start). And then there's the warranty of 2 years, which is more than enough to show problems if it really is 'cheap, creaky and brittle'. This is a complete misconception, unsupported by evidence, and at odds with reality. The only thing you got right was the price tag. That's high because they are the best products on the market, as far as testing shows, and you get what you pay for. This video clearly evidenced this, as have many others.
@meteora8888Ай бұрын
Well I can't help it if you have low standards for build quality and want to masturbate over materials. Then again I find the build quality and materials on my 2021 Porsche 992 to be pretty crap too. Must be nice having low standards.
@VacuumFactsАй бұрын
Again, you've made a factual claim about "low standards for build quality" but failed to evidence it in a manner than anyone respectable would take you seriously. You're in conflict with simple observations and seem to be getting offended when someone points this out to you and making purile suggestions. I recognise you think they use 'cheap materials' but there's no evidence of this, no evidence of poor build quality, and no evidence of increased failure rates. There is evidence of you being at odds with reality and thinking your subjective viewpoint trumps objective facts. Oh dear...
@meteora8888Ай бұрын
Lol... Happy masturbating with your dyson you nigel. That's the only suction you get it seems.
@simon1419Ай бұрын
Doesn't seem like the self scraping shroud did a very good job cleaning the shroud at 15:04. I'm not hating, but just pointing it out. I just bought a V15 so I'm just watching reviews while waiting for it!
@VacuumFactsАй бұрын
If extremely soiled like it was, a couple of swipes in all of 1 second clears it. Also, even if you don't, it's loosened so the air removes much of it. The purpose is to remove the accreted material so there's space for air to pass through. The brilliant design in the future models is fundamentally changing this as well to avoid the problem of shroud clogging entirely.
@simon1419Ай бұрын
@@VacuumFactsAh, that makes sense. Do you have a video or link to information on the future models? I love seeing what Dyson comes up with!
@VacuumFactsАй бұрын
No link because it's still being researched. But I've described it in the comments here kzread.info/dash/bejne/noukxq1rY5e-lrg.html
@chickenlover7823Ай бұрын
I agree with many others who commented. Dyson ball Cylinder corded are the best vacuums Dyson ever made (not the tall uprights but the standard looking ones like the big ball animal/ multifloor etc). If used with a Turbine brush and not the standard flat head it mostly comes with, it will beat anything on the matket. They have the best suction with deep clean and removes all hair. Avoid cordless as their batteries degrade, limited runtime, not much suction and very expensive that's why they have these gimmicks now like the green light to see crumbs on the floor and lcd screen to switch between normal and maximum power but u can't use normal as it doesn't pick anything up so u have to use max power but that isnt advised as battery and motor can't handle it. They sell the upright corded still but u can barely do one room as its really heavy to manoeuvre and exhausting and im over 6 ft and quite fit and still it ain't good as the discontinued ball cylinders. Its a big step backwards for Dyson
@VacuumFactsАй бұрын
The cylinders didn't perform as well as the other formfactors, as the data shows. Having owned all, I can confirm the latest Dyson cordless cleaners are considerably beyond their mains powered machines. They have comparable performance using much less power (as the data clearly shows), are far easier to use, facilitate bite-sized cleaning, are easier to empty, quieter, and have much better HEPA filtration. The shortcomings you emphasise are simply not a problem in practical use in typical homes. Furthermore, post 2025 when the new battery technology revolution starts, they'll be quantum leaped again. The new design features in the next generation of cordless coming are very impressive.
@chacha-oy5sbАй бұрын
Achetez plutôt un bon aspirateur, bien plus puissant et fiable, et qui n'a pas besoin LUI d'être sans cesse nettoyé....Dyson de la merde !
@MattBroomАй бұрын
This is not a fair review Because the Dyson has a motorized Floor head That by itself does better cleaning a carpet regardless of the machine Compare to a straight section cleaner yes vacuum with a brush roll would clean better But Henry is just a straight straight suction vacuum So therefore the tests Are not fair
@VacuumFactsАй бұрын
It's a perfectly fair review because both are vacuum cleaners designed to vacuum floors. One works well, the other doesn't. You correctly identified why. One is sold to you with poorer technology, like a non-motorised floorhead, thereby making the job less effective for your money. That's what a review is; comparing the two as sold. And then there's literally everything else important, discussed in the video, that your comment didn't seem to acknowledge...
@MattBroomАй бұрын
So are you basically saying the only vacuum in the world isn't Dyson?The only type of action that can actually clean youbecause a Fifty dollar a vacuum from walmart or a grocery store can easily outperform a dyson In the regards of deep cleaning dirt out of a pile of the carpet I could even prove it
@VacuumFactsАй бұрын
I don't understand your first sentence because it doesn't make any sense. If you can send the professionally -acquired data, ensuring it's independently verified by a reputable source, demonstrating "a Fifty dollar a vacuum from walmart or a grocery store can easily outperform a dyson", then I'll take a look. Otherwise, I don't believe you. And then there's literally everything else to consider that you haven't mentioned.
@fedtmuleerikАй бұрын
I had ordered the v15 and it is on its way to me but this review made me order the gen5 as well 😂😂 guess I will be returning the v15 😂
@metinandrnАй бұрын
I think this money is not given to this machine, I bought gen5, but unfortunately, my advice to those who will buy it until everything is bought should read the complaints, there are those who have a lot of victimisation. I've been waiting for a carpet cap for about 2 months.
@CB19087Ай бұрын
You don't sound like a very nice person. People are allowed to disagree with you without being called stupid. Dyson are crap, you're just trying to convince yourself they're good 😂 or you have shares in dyson 🧐
@VacuumFactsАй бұрын
Of course people can disagree. Except on factual matters, which are true or false, on which there's evidence bearing, if people disagree with what's shown to be true, then they ARE stupid. Something you failed to recognise. I recognise you think Dyson machines are crap. I disagree, relative to other machines. And unless you can evidence why convincingly, in a way that doesn't show you are at odds with reality, then you won't change any minds here. You're also falling victim to the stupidity of confusing between stating facts that suggest something positive about a company's product and being some kind of tribal fanboy.
@1stRanger2 ай бұрын
It was a huge mistake to stop developing these in parallel to cordless models. Cordless vacuums can never replace corded models for a number of reasons all of which being physics related. One can't change the laws of physics. Both designs have their strengths and weaknesses and should be used for the right task.
@VacuumFacts2 ай бұрын
What are the 'physics' reasons you claim that a cordless machine can't replace a corded machine, precisely? The rest of your comment is at odds with reality of course, and the empirical evidence is all over my channel.
@1stRanger2 ай бұрын
@@VacuumFacts By design cordless vacuums are top heavy and have very limited runtime and capacity and you can't increase either of these without making them very uncomfortable to use due to their weight. For instance can feel all that weight in your hand even on their relatively light and most popular V15. I'm not even talking about outsize models, as they are virtually unusable for most people. So there's pretty nothing nothing you can do about it, as you can't make cordless vacuum bottom heavy. It will simply hinder their versatility. In fact according to many users and many reviews the only cordless Dyson that is not cumbersome to use is V12 and it's very limited by its bin capacity. But it has very small bin and not as good for carpets cleaning. All their relatively light models are limited by only 60min runtime at min power. On practice no one is going to use it at min power, so the actual runtime is going to be even less, than that. And so cleaning a large house with cordless vacuum is not practical. It's only suitable for small or relatively clean spaces that don't require much cleaning. Corded vacuums on the other hand always have been and always will be more suitable for large spaces that require long cleaning sessions. And didn't even mention how ineffective modern battery technologies are and that drawing power directly from the wall is always much more effective and doesn't require wasting time on recharge or money on a new battery that inevitably going to lose its capacity and rather sooner than later.
@VacuumFacts2 ай бұрын
>>”Cordless vacuum runtime and capacity are very limited by design and you can't increase either of these without increasing its weight and making it very uncomfortable to use.” Run time is determined by the power consumption and battery capacity. Poorly designed machines with weak and inferior technology require large heavy batteries and multiple of them to get decent runtimes. It has been established with good design that you can have run times sufficient to perform typical cleaning sessions with performance greater than even good mains machines without large weights. There is thus plenty of evidence showing that cordless can replace mains cleaners. As for bin capacity, the capacity in good designs is enough to last for a cleaning session and the emptying in said good designs takes 5 seconds without mess, making it superior to even the best mains machine emptying methods. Again, this conflicts with the suggestion that mains machines can’t replace cordless-at least when referring to best in class of each. >>”Pair this with the fact that cordless vacuums are top heavy and quite have already. You can feel all that weight in your hand much more than with bottom heavy corded models or canister vacuums that have most of the weight in a separate block altogether.” When used on floor, it is false to suggest you can feel the weight in your hand much more. The lower mass of (good) cordless machines also reduces inertia, making it feel much lighter to push than bottom-heavy mains machines. For above floor cleaning, good cordless machines (that have enough power to clean with simultaneous long run times) are typically 3 kg or less. The best machines are not overly tiring to use above floor and the much greater ease of use than corded machine is a much better use case. Furthermore, next gen battery technology looking to be released in late 2025 will quite revolutionise cordless cleaners. >> “runtime is only 60min at min power, which on practice is not going to be effective to use, especially if there's a lot of dirty carpets.” This is a misunderstanding consigned to the bin long ago. You can get a run time in auto mode enough to complete a reasonable cleaning session with performance superior to even good mains machines. People don’t like the whole-house mega clean chore anymore and habits have evolved now into bite-sized cleaning, which this formfactor champions. Run time is simply not a good argument anymore. >> “…cleaning a large house with cordless vacuum is not practical. It's only suitable for small or relatively clean spaces that don't require much cleaning.” This is complete nonsense as well. We bite size cleaning now and you can do a large house, as plenty of people show online >>”Corded vacuums on the other hand always have been and always will be more suitable for large spaces that require long cleaning sessions.” This is again false. Cordless machines are used in commercial environments quite successfully, conflicting badly with your claim. Weight, bin capacity, and run time tropes are your primary justifications for cordless not being able to replace corded. These have been debunked many years ago. Also, I’m still missing these ‘physics reasons’ you referred to (distinct from correct language associated with physical properties and practicalities of use).
@1stRanger2 ай бұрын
@@VacuumFacts I gave you simple facts and reasons with real world examples of Dyson's own models, but you seem to be one of those mindless Dyson fanboys, that accept only facts in their own favor and discard all the rest. I can only wish you and your "facts" channel good luck. You gonna need it.
@VacuumFacts2 ай бұрын
I simply didn't agree with your factual claims because they doesn't stand up to scrutiny. You appear to have ignored the details of what I gave you the respect to respond to, then took offense seemingly because the nonsense you claimed was well-challenged in a manner that made sense, and exposed your subjective wonky worldview. Instead you've now fallen back on a bizarre, tribal, form of anti-Dyson racism-like behaviour that constantly litters this place.
@1stRanger2 ай бұрын
No amount of technology can prevent idiots from using it wrong and claiming it doesn't work.
@goodmusicenjoyer972 ай бұрын
Did everything in the video exactly (and I mean EXACTLY) as iterated - didn’t fix the problem at all. What a waste of time. Lame video.
@VacuumFacts2 ай бұрын
Don't believe you because that makes no sense.
@goodmusicenjoyer972 ай бұрын
@@VacuumFacts believe me or don’t - the facts are the facts. Do better next time, buddy.
@VacuumFacts2 ай бұрын
What facts? You didn't present any. Where's the data? How do you explain your observations in detail that makes sense? This is why no one sensible would believe your wild statement that contradicts actual observation. Do better next time, buddy.
@goodmusicenjoyer972 ай бұрын
@@VacuumFacts facts: followed your silly little guide and this Dyson still smells like ass. Data: the Dyson smells like ass. Observations in detail: despite following step by step recommendations in video, the Dyson still smells like ass. Supporting data: several other comments state the same exact results (one with 19 upvotes nonetheless!). Conclusion: your video is useless and a waste of time. Need anything else?
@goodmusicenjoyer972 ай бұрын
@@VacuumFacts Facts: my Dyson smelled like mildew. I followed every little suggestion in your silly video step by step. It still smells exactly the same as before. Data: this vacuum still smells like mildew. Observations in detail: the vacuum cleaner still smells the exact same as it did before I followed this guide. Supporting research (several other comments, including one with 17 upvotes) points to strong evidence that this video does not provide a solution. Conclusion: this video is a useless waste of time. Need anything else?
@consty7152 ай бұрын
Bags are crap, You on drugs?
@VacuumFacts2 ай бұрын
Video shows why. You on drugs?
@CB19087Ай бұрын
@@VacuumFacts because you said so?
@VacuumFactsАй бұрын
@@CB19087 No, because the evidence showed it. It was in the video.
@jeffstewart31702 ай бұрын
Who cares how much is not captured to what micron level when central vacuum is pulling ALL the dirt out to your garage canister...anything lost is in your garage, not your house like all other vacuums. Seriously you are going to compare the amount of power used as a reason to not buy a central vacuum? Who cares, it's not even a dime to vacuum your house in power to get all the dust and allergens outside of your home, while your HEPA filter fails because it's dirty and puts it back into your home. I owned a Dyson Animal, and it wasn't anywhere near as long lasting and a quality build of my central vacuum system. If its about efficiencies and money, go buy a Eureka Hepa upright for $79, and save yourself all the expense of a Dyson, put that savings into an investment earning 10% and you will be way ahead.
@VacuumFacts2 ай бұрын
These are unconvincing, short-sighted arguments debunked long ago. You show such staggering ignorance, I can only assume you're a 'central vac fan'. The idea that a "HEPA filter fails because it's dirty and puts it back into your home" is so dripping with total ignorance of how they work, it's literally not worth me investing time ridiculing this comment anymore. Way to ignore the points raised in the video or brush them off unconvincingly.
@ronanoneill80782 ай бұрын
Testing in a lab is all well and good but if own and use these things regularly over a long time you get the real picture. Mr Henry has never let me down and he's always smiling and that's good enough for me.
@VacuumFacts2 ай бұрын
Representative lab testing has value. I test in my home and get a similarly real picture. Everything pointed out in this video is what you get when using it in the home. I believe you when you say your Henry has never let you down. But then there's literally everything else raised in the Henry product review videos to consider beyond reliability alone. If it's still good enough for you, that's great. But the point of my channel is to point out the whole picture that is otherwise hidden behind half-truths so innocent people are not misled and know the full truth before making their own independent decisions.
@Ronanone0072 ай бұрын
Filters are a pain, stops the vacuum and then you have to wait to wash and dry them to continue, bags for me.
@VacuumFacts2 ай бұрын
The cleaners that use bags have filters too. The bags are filters themselves. What you're advocating here is a throwaway, disposable, polluting, and a costly way of working that's wholly avoidable. If it wasn't that the machine cost more money than bags, you'd probably just throw the entire machine into landfill and get another when it was full. The best cyclonic bagless machines (namely the patented original design), if treated correctly, rarely need to have their filters washed because they're a last line of defense that hardly sees any of the dirt. Plenty of evidence for this, e.g. here kzread.info/dash/bejne/hmek1LqLXcTLf8o.html . What you're revealing here is either that most bagless clones are terrible and sully the original idea, as discussed here kzread.info/dash/bejne/h5OltZSiZqu3grw.html, or you are unable to muster the small effort to rinse a filter once in a blue moon, which is made easy as discussed here kzread.info/dash/bejne/g4iHw8aInZm9o6w.html . And then there's literally every other problem and drawback of bagged machines you've glossed over, as discussed here kzread.info/dash/bejne/oqiCks2kf9etg7A.html and evidenced in this very video seemingly ignored (or you were incapable of appreciating) that you think an ultra rare filter rinse is worse than. None of this makes you look good.
@Ronanone0072 ай бұрын
@@VacuumFacts I am going with my experience with a Dyson, got so fed up with it suddenly stopping because of the filter it just wasn't worth it. Numatic cleaners last much longer and if you are really worried about the environment you can also stick your finger in the bag and empty it.
@VacuumFacts2 ай бұрын
I don't believe it suddenly stopped because of the filter. That makes no sense. The only way it would 'suddenly stop' because of a filter is if it's completely blocked. The only way it would block to that extent on a Dyson is through complete neglect, as evidenced beyond all reasonable doubt in basic testing ( kzread.info/dash/bejne/p6l6krNpqJa2aKg.html ), let alone an understanding of the associated science. Plenty of evidence filters don't block e.g. kzread.info/dash/bejne/hmek1LqLXcTLf8o.html . A bag is the exact same as a filter (except in the original cyclonic system, it's a last line of defense that sees virtually nothing under correct usage). So, if a Dyson 'suddenly stops', then a bag will 'suddenly stop' too since it's the same thing. And arguing Numatic cleaners last much longer is nonsense and unsupported by any reputable evidence. The idea you can empty a bag by sticking your finger in there is silly, since it doesn't remove the blocking micro particles, as evidenced here kzread.info/dash/bejne/g4iHw8aInZm9o6w.html and in performance testing in this video. None of this makes any sense and then there's literally every other problem and drawback of bagged machines you've glossed over, as discussed here kzread.info/dash/bejne/oqiCks2kf9etg7A.html and evidenced in this very video. I've seen all this before. You like Numatic and dislike Dyson at a cosmetic, subjective level. That's fine. But nonsensical factual claims will be called out here.
@Flushmaster03122 ай бұрын
This was the most helpful video. I luckily had some talkum powder on hand.
@sallymitchell64232 ай бұрын
Thanks for all your reviews. I’ve already decided not to buy the vacuum I was going to buy. Trouble is, now I’ve watched several of your videos, I’m not sure which one will be best for my needs. I’m sold on a Dyson (obvs) but not sure I need to buy the latest /greatest as it’s just for quick clean ups and to take away in the camper. If you don’t mind my asking, would you recommend something like a V11 for this kind of use (as it’s now cheaper than when it first came out), or should I spend more money on a more recent model? Tia for your advice.
@VacuumFacts2 ай бұрын
All their products are best in class for its generation and are still beyond the competition, as the data shows. The more recent models do it quicker/more easily/generally better because there's tech in there to improve things. An older one like the V11 will be good and similar and cost less. Just have to look at the features each model offers and decide what suits your budget.
@zakirhussain22662 ай бұрын
Thanks for the insight buyimg extra stuff everytime is a scam I say like you said can you do a review of the vax onepwr blade 5 I'm thinking of getting one
@VacuumFacts2 ай бұрын
I'm unlikely to review that model because there's no interesting or novel technology in there. The specifications provided and the technology are clearly substantially inferior to the best products on the market. It's therefore not competing in the same market space and is clearly intending to be a lower cost knock-off. It'll work, just not anything like as well.
@VandalIO3 ай бұрын
Does the cyclone increase the suction ? And airflow
@VacuumFacts3 ай бұрын
No that's not how they work. The motor determines the suction. The magnitude of airflow in the context seen talked about on YT is not directly relevant for reasons I'll do a video on in the future. Watch out for all sources that say it is important. They lack knowledge of basic science, as will be revealed, and cannot be trusted, no matter what they say. Cyclones resist the flow of air but the motor is tuned to compensate to achieve the desired aerodynamic properties at the cleaner head where dirt removal occurs. Their function is to separate particles from the air.
@MikeDurham-kw9wr3 ай бұрын
So why does a Kirby leave the wood floor under my carpet clean, while everything else leaves a ton of dust under the carpet?
@VacuumFacts3 ай бұрын
It's not possible to know without any meaningful information and data. However, all possibilities are covered in several of my videos under the kirby kzread.info/head/PLBxUOcW7kaEs7xuTK2A-pncwupMjXuRbb and educational playlists kzread.info/head/PLBxUOcW7kaEvk3bygbiP56Fw3UtLog_p_
@mazinya3 ай бұрын
is it worth it for $783 or still considered as overpriced?
@VacuumFacts3 ай бұрын
"Considered overpriced" is subjective. It's better than anything else by far and therefore costs more than anything else. The rest have cut corners and produced a less good product. They charge almost as much. You get what you pay for in this case. It's for an individual to determine whether they wish to spend this amount of money to get the best product of this class on the market by all meaningful, objective measures. Alternatively, they can pay much less and get much less. I bought this product with my own money. I thought it was extremely expensive. Luckily, I could afford it. I think every penny was well spent and would buy it again if ever needed. I've tried the cheaper products. They're cheaper for a reason and I wouldn't buy them again.
@mazinya3 ай бұрын
@@VacuumFacts Thank you. I have seen quite a few reviews showing that on bare floor at least, there is actually almost no difference between the G5 and even the supposedly weaker and cheaper V12
@VacuumFacts3 ай бұрын
That's probably true. Bare floors without crevices are relatively simple to clean. An antistatic technology and a means to ensure small and large particles can be brought into the cleaner head are the key features needed, and both products have those. Carpets require more advanced technology to clean well.
@mazinya3 ай бұрын
@@VacuumFacts So it is safe to say that the Gen5 has no significant advantage over the V12 for instance, when it comes to a house with 99% bare floors other than larger bin and a little longer battery?
@VacuumFacts3 ай бұрын
The Gen5Detect has more air power, so can extract dirt from deeper cracks if you have any. It has a higher grade HEPA filter if you suffer allergies. And it has a larger bin and longer run time, but a bit more weight. Otherwise, for hard floors, they'll be comparable. However, the next gen machines coming out (possibly soon) might be worth waiting for.
@SomeRandomIrishGuy3 ай бұрын
AIR not hair
@AC-32323 ай бұрын
I was going to get one of these but was concerned over having to put a new bag in every time you emptied it. I have to empty mine every time i hoover. I've 5 dogs so this would work out expensive for me to get
@VacuumFacts3 ай бұрын
Yeah. And then there's everything else poor about it in the video.
@JackLe11273 ай бұрын
I feel like this guy was paid by dyson to defend their bad design. I bought a vacuum used from someone and I tried all cleaning tricks under the sun and it still smelled. Basically every part that touched the air smelled. I had to take apart the cyclone and soaked it in soapy water over night and air dried it for a couple days to reduce the smell. The smell is still there but not as strong.
@VacuumFacts3 ай бұрын
I feel like this guy is a paid anti-dyson shill who will just say the opposite of what's shown to be true with correct usage in the video. You took a used and no doubt abused product and almost certainly didn't do what was specified in the video, did things you're not supposed to do, and then complain it still smells. Probably didn't correctly rinse the filter, probably didn't use microsponges...and so on. Yawn
@maymeihar4781Ай бұрын
Mind is still under warranty and yet they told me to change the motor need to pay for rm1k + which ty said the motor still function not warranty for it😅
Пікірлер
I will never understand why people don’t like innovation in vacuum technology like Dyson consistently does, they love brands that never improve their product line and often collect old junk and recommend products that use old dated technology that’s bad for the environment as well as wasteful.
It's a combination of tribalism, lack of education, and lack of critical thinking. Those afflicted congregate into the 'vacuum enthusiast' community online, which are pretty rabid. It was their vitriol that inspired me to make this channel as a counter.
I was able to get the v15 detect extra from Best Buy for $549. Very happy and a great deal
You have a very nice voice but I find your accent difficult to understand. Would it be helpful to add written text?
You're welcome to translate into writing, upload to a location of your choice, and post a link here for other people, if you're as passionate as you sound.
I’ve had dysons for years. Got tired of cleaning filters and pulling all the bits apart to clean. Never mind the junk battery with Dyson! Got the Henry and wouldn’t look back. All dust is trapped in the bag that also acts as a filter. Cleans better. Only downside I can find is that it is slightly heavier but hardly noticeable and I can sacrifice this as it’s almost half the price of Dyson. I would 100% recommend the Henry all day long!
Something's wrong then. The filters shouldn't get that dirty. It's possible to go for months without needing to rinse it, e.g. kzread.info/dash/bejne/hmek1LqLXcTLf8o.html without issues or loss of performance. You don't need to pull any bits apart to clean. In fact, you don't need to clean it. What were you doing with it? The major downsides of the Henry design you glossed over are evidenced clearly in all the reviews. It's also completely false they clean better and there is hard data for that. You also, unsurprisingly, didn't mention which model of either machine you were talking about.
amazing review
If you have mainly hard surfaces, you absolutely want the fluffy head. It does not throw nearly as much debris as the motorbar. Our dogs shed a lot and bring in a tonne of dust and the fluffy head does a way better job on hardwood and laminate. I am due for a new Dyson and would not consider only having a motorbar. It does work amazingly on carpet though!
The motorbar doesn't throw debris under real-world usage. There's also no evidence one performs better than another in real-world situations. People may subjectively 'feel' otherwise and like it more though.
@@VacuumFactsNo, in the five years I've been using both on a weekly basis it's 'fact' that the fluffy head works better on hard surfaces and throws less debris. I don't have a video to back it up, just countless weeks of using both heads and experimenting lol
That conflicts with my experience and direct, real-world representative measurements. Go figure.
>> "@VacuumFacts Fair enough, though I think this video does a better job than yours of comparing the two heads; kzread.info/dash/bejne/qaVhpMmYcdasadI.html" My video doesn't attempt to compare the heads under real-world representative conditions. This was explicitly stated in the video description. This was just a silly entertainment video to appease that audience. The video you pointed to also doesn't show meaningful real-world representative conditions. Worse, it doesn't state that and implies it's a meaningful comparison. And, almost a moot point, but the head being used in that video is a much, much older design without the gates of the more recent head, so obviously it's not going to work as well for large particles-that's why that old head was updated. So, to conclude that video "does a better job than yours of comparing the two heads" is absurd on many levels when you break it down and look beyond the cosmetic. The reality is, under real-world representative conditions, both heads do comparable jobs. One is just more practical to use in mixed-flooring homes.
Great highlighting crucial points and differences. I never knew such improvements were made on the v15 so I'm definitely getting their top model. Your a great Dyson enthusiast!
It's a disgrace there's nowhere on the internet, let alone YT where you can find that out either. If you want a job doing right... The Gen5 advancements are covered in its review as well. The next model looks to substantially revolutionise many areas as well, whenever it's released. Also, I'm not a "Dyson enthusiast"; I'm a technology enthusiast. It just happens that Dyson are the only one pushing the technology and so get all the attention. The rest just copy at the customers' expense.
Hello. I think you underestimate the change of the nylon bristles a bit : it makes a big difference with more dense pile. I am currently testing the dyson lineup from the gen5 down to the v8 and especially with the v8 using the gen5 head it makes a huge difference in performance (i am testing with certified test dust - the same used in IEC standard). Also the v15 is performing better with the gen5 head - but it performs also better while just using the gen5 brush. Sadly dyson made some changes in the diameter and the length of the brushes so you experience some rattle noise while using it with the v15 head (at least the one i have - its from the first batches delivered). I would recommend to use the gen5 head with every older model (if it will ever be available to buy - current situation really sucks regarding replacement parts). Sadly you can not use the older brushes (lenght is different, diameter is different and the front cap at the brushmotor changed) with the gen5 head to gather more data or use the older cleaning heads with the gen5 due to the minor connector change (at least not without modifying the older ones). I made a video about the results of the gen5 and v8 - usually i am doing more vacuum robot related stuff. Regards
Please can you evidence and quantify “the change of the nylon bristles”? Presumably you mean wear. If you didn’t, then it’s not clear what you’re talking about, why it’s meaningful, or how you’ve concluded I’ve ‘underestimated the change of the nylon bristles’. I’ve reviewed your test methodology and it is not satisfactory to draw any convincing conclusions from it. The most obvious problems I noticed were that • You didn’t specify carpet backing type; its porosity strongly determines results. • You didn’t say how you controlled distribution of test dust to ensure homogeneity. • You simply pressed down on the test dust, which doesn’t simulate fibre motion and representative embedding, and why controlled brushing is better. • You showed variable numbers of passes over same area to collect datapoints, particularly in later passes (e.g. V8 with Gen5 head), which is clearly unrepresentative. I’ve not yet seen any other source on YT which doesn’t suffer from obvious issues with testing methodology.
This guy has obviously never used a Central vac!, what a twat. Central vacs have 3-5 times the cleaning power of portables and the biggest selling feature is they exhaust any dust or particles that escape the bag,filter or cyclone outside your home. Nothing beats having a central vac system. If you did your research you'd know they are highly recommended by Drs for those who suffer from allergies and asthma.
This guy has obviously never watched the video...
very thorough review, i'm surprised we can still find quality content like this on youtube, thanks a lot !!
Me too. It's very disturbing how YT has evolved. It's a regressively capitalist machine now.
I don't know if you're even gonna read this, and i'm not even the type of person who comments on videos, but I have to put this here. Thank you so much for everything you do on this channel. Just got myself a v12 origin and within the first few days, i've already done almost all the things that you aren't supposed to do with it (wiping the bin seals, trying to "deep clean" it since it sucks out so much dirt in my space,...) partly because I thought a dyson would require as much maintainance as other vacuums thanks to other vacuum review channels before finding out about your channel. Not only did I learn so much about how to properly use a dyson, all my questions regarding the vacuum are also answered, namely the way the cyclones work, how often we need to wash the filter, how dyson seperate dirt and the engineering feats of dyson vacuums overall. Before this I was quite interested in vacuum tech and have used a couple of other vacuums from China cause they're cheap and available in my country, it is fascinating to find out about all the tech in a dyson via your coherent, clear and understandable way, simply incredible. Too bad this isn't the gold standard of how you review stuff on the internet, i've fallen for quite a lot of shit people circulating around just because they use their vacuums inappropriately and blame the technology for not working as expected, i've also took a look at your comments and the fact you're clarifying all the facts and all the propaganda that people throw in till this day using hard, evidence based tests and measurements is amazing, love it. This platform needs more people like you, thank you for what you do and for answering all my questions, I hope you can keep doing this cause the impact of you is real, at least to me. Cheers!
I still have new educational videos planned for this channel...eventually. If more manufacturers innovated, there'd be more review videos. Sadly, they just clone on the cheap at the customers' expense or peddle useless gimmicks.
@@VacuumFacts It's refreshing to see a channel that just stop doing reviews, yet still actively supports viewers when there's no actually new product coming out, instead of milking every single inferior releases from other companies over and over. After using my Dyson, I have to say currently, they are clearly light years ahead of the competition (if you can even call it competition). Hopefully some interesting stuff happens in the future. By the way, is it normal for the filters to have light fraying on the non-HEPA part, and is it by design choice that the wand and other attachments are slightly loose when connected to the vacuum ?
Yes, the premotor filter is essentially a bunch of fibres, so they become frayed with rinses. But they still filter fine. The 'looseness' is mechanical spring that good design incorporates to minimise fracture chance. Many people (usually Dyson brand haters) wrongly conclude it's bad. It's actually good and they're still sealed.
@@VacuumFacts Exactly as I thought, thanks for the answer it really saved me a headache. Now onto binge watching the rest of your videos lol
Propaganda.
What is? The evidence-supported facts presented? Someone sounds like they don't like reality. :/
@@VacuumFacts Reality from what your independent home testing that's not in a lab and has no real actual science to back it up? You're having a laugh mate. And don't get me started about calling other machines clones and then claiming that they don't match the Dyson in performance and don't look like it what's so ever. Utter waffling and misleading consumers from your end. Shameful behaviour.
The testing I do is not to the same statistical rigour of industry standard testing, but does not suffer from the flaws seen in all other bedroom testing seen on YT. It shows a fairly representative relative comparison that is fully in line with a) expectations from known science and what would be expected (see all other videos on my channel), and b) with evidence formally acquired from industry standard testing. You simply haven't a made a case here. And then there's everything else in the review glossed over.
@@VacuumFacts My case is you're a self proclaimed Dyson biased superfan (thank you for clarifying in previous comments, makes my case and point work a lot easier) which while fine doesn't translate to the unbiased review that this should be. Do you mention obvious undeniable flaws in the machine (and there many) yes. Do you give fair marks to the competition and even possibly recommend other machines from different brands? No. That's what a REVIEW is for. Pointing out the pros and cons of a machine and taking the cons and formulating possible other options for the cons for consumers. People like MKBHD, one of the most notable tech reviewers on the platform wouldn't be nearly as good as 16M subscribers worth of success if he didn't do this extremely basic practice. People that have been collecting vacuums and testing them personally has a hobby since their childhood like Parwaz786 who is also somewhat of a Dyson fan points out that this machine is lacking in build quality and general good brownie points you want on a machine that nearly costs as much as a high-range television. Also, if you know and accept that the tests you do are quote "bedroom-like" your channel shouldn't be plastered and even video water marked in "vacuum facts" like it's a general facts channel on the entire topic rather than a few home tests by a Dyson superfan judging new machines.
>>”you're a self-proclaimed Dyson biased superfan” What evidence have you relied on to conclude this? Please share it. I have stated the exact opposite on more occasions than I can remember now. >> “Do you mention obvious undeniable flaws in the machine (and there many) yes.” Pity then you didn’t mention and then evidence a single one in a manner consistent with your very own criticisms. Makes you look very hypocritical. >> “Do you give fair marks to the competition and even possibly recommend other machines from different brands?” What does that even mean? “Fair marks to the competition”? This is a relative comparison. What was observed was reported. I don’t even recommend the Dyson machine; I simply stated the facts. People can make their own minds up. Not sure how you missed this or why you appear offended. >> “That's what a REVIEW is for.” You have a bizarre and warped idea of what a review is. This review is a review of the facts and the full truth. Technologically, there’s little to criticise relative to the competition. >> “Parwaz786 who is also somewhat of a Dyson fan points out that this machine is lacking in build quality” That person is an entertainer and provides little in the way of credible testing or facts of a nature within the remit of this channel. You also failed to explain what “lacking in build quality” even means, let alone evidence it. You carry no credibility and are being very hypocritical. >> “your channel shouldn't be plastered and even video water marked in "vacuum facts" like it's a general facts channel” The watermark is to stamp my content. The name reflects that I present the facts and full truth. Plenty of evidence of that on my channel. >> “by a Dyson superfan judging new machines.” That you think I’m a Dyson (the company) superfan automatically leaves you without credibility. I care about technology on this channel and only the best I can identify, which, like it or not, comes from Dyson at the moment. Sorry it offends your apparently tribal worldview. You’ve spouted much here but provided the same level of substance from all the similar whiny voices I’ve become bored with in the past-namely zero.
I don’t suppose you have an opinion on the V15 total clean vs the V15 absolute, do you? I’m really struggling to find the difference between them and Dyson customer service have been no help at all. I’m trying to decide between the 2. I’ve found deals on both so there’s not much difference in price. Will the battery on the absolute be enough to vacuum an average 3 bed semi-detached house? I’ve read some reviews saying the battery is appalling and given the price I want to ensure I’m making the right decision.
Dyson customer service have become very, very poor recently (as of mid 2024) and lets down the entire company. The total clean is the higher end product, whose only difference is that it comes with more tools-most notably the anti-hair screw tool, which is pretty core. I'd also add the Gen5 is much better still, and the next product looks to be quite radically different, whenever it's released (maybe next year).
@@VacuumFacts I’m glad you mentioned the customer service because I’ve found the same thing. My wife and daughter have Dyson hairdryers, when my wife had an issue end of last year they were great but we called 2 weeks ago about my daughter’s and they were utterly useless. It’s a real shame, given it’s a premium product, good CS should be an area in which they excel. Thanks for the reply, very helpful!
Their customer service used to be truly excellent. Replacement of modular parts no questions asked. Now it's a joke and others have described the utter shambles it is now and the miserable experience you have to endure if something goes wrong. What a genuine shame. Technologically, they are unsurpassed or even approached.
I am 73 years old. Over all these years I have owned many vacuum cleaners. I bought a Dyson V11 2 years ago at Costco on sale at $399.00. I had paid as much as $700.00 many years before and never had a vacuum cleaner near as good as this Dyson vacuum. I was a factory rep for a Carpet Mfg for 40 years and did inspections on carpet performance complaints. Many were vacuum cleaner-related. I would always inspect the customer's vacuum cleaner for problems. Beater bar issues were a significant cause of problems causing snags if there was a protruding problem on the bar. As far as Dysons go the carpet would stay looking new longer because the power in removing very small particles was superior. These particles act as a file on the fibers and dull the luster thus making traffic patterns more visible by a huge degree. Buy Dyson, you can't go wrong!
They're engineered to be the best known how. The other manufacturers copy at the customers' expense to bypass the expensive R&D. Sadly, Dyson's customer service quality has fallen off a cliff recently. Not sure I agree that particles affect the lusture of carpet. It would depend on the carpet itself and abrasion by other materials will affect wear just as much.
So, Dyson gets the victory yet Dyson has also been accused by consumers of the 90's to early teens "no loss of suction" claims to be false advertising?
You seem to be confusing wild accusation with evidence supported facts.
@@VacuumFacts It's not actually that wild. I just looked into it for a matter of five minutes and there are lawsuits from ORECK and bothered consumers that indicate to the false no loss of suction claims. One such article is from the guardian in 2007 where the NSA (which also looked into this case with Shark V Dyson) said that the No Loss of Suction claims from Dyson were untrue. My point is, this is a hypocritical move from Dyson although what Shark was trying to pull off was sketchy too. I just think that this video shines a limelight on Dyson that shouldn't really be there as they've been stuffed into the same corner for the same shady advertising and claims before.
You seem to be confusing wild accusation with evidence supported facts.
@@VacuumFacts You keep posting the same comment this time 10 minutes apart...
Because it still applied. You continued to show no understanding of the distinction between clear, objective evidence and accusation.
Perfect video
Not a bad video at all....I will however say that if you've got some reasonable DIY skills its really not that hard to crack these open and give them a good cleanout. In my experience the internal cyclone/catchment area can and does contribute to the smell, despite your tests there. Breaking the vac down slightly and giving the area a clean and blowout with compressed air does help.
I'm sure. But the whole point of the video is to explain why it's irrelevant to. It's not recommended by the manufacturer or designed to be broken apart. The things listed all but eliminate bad odours if you do them correctly.
The Dyson Ball Animal 3 is very similar to the UK Ball Animal 2, except it uses the same wand design as the DC41, and it has the hair removal vanes in the cleaner head, which I really like. It's an improvement over the US version of the Ball Animal 2, which is basically like the DC41 but with better suction and agitation.
Would it be possible to review JIMMY mattress vacuum?
If you can explain why its technology pushes the boundaries at a deep technical level relative to current leading technology and warrants attention on my channel. If you don't, convincingly, I'll assume it was some shady marketing comment and encourage everyone to avoid your products.
The Miele Blizzard's bagless design looks like total complete crap that you would see from a bagless vacuum in the early 2000's lol. Miele is generally known for having excellent filtration, but their claim of the Blizzard's lifetime filter being HEPA should be taken with a full shaker of salt.
11:46 It seems the 0.5 to 4.2 micron size range is referring to the separation efficiency of the Jet Cyclone technology. They don't say what size particles the filtration system can trap at 99.999% efficiency, but I highly doubt it's 0.3 microns or smaller.
They very explicitly state it's the filtration performance of their machine following the IEC test standard using their boost mode (i.e. the best they can get). They capture 99.999% of particles to 0.5 µm in size (i.e. easy, huge boulders). It's not as impressive as it sounds, and they patronise the customer by hoping they are too ignorant of what all this means to see through their snake oil and inferiority relative to their better competitor's technology.
@@VacuumFacts Yeah I agree with you. It seems like the multi-cyclonic design's of Dyson's competitors doesn't quite match up to Dyson's Root Cyclone and Radial Root Cyclone technologies, and of course the Cinetic cyclones have no competition that can match it. I'm glad that I bought a Dyson for myself for Christmas lol
Filter Queen has been dethroned in the filtration category lol. Their filtration efficiency is 99.98% @ 0.1 microns, so seeing 99.99% efficiency from the Gen5 is amazing. If I can save up the money someday, I would love to get one.
The Filter Queen does not specify the size range associated with their "99.98%" claim on their (broken and ugly) website. They don't even make the claim it's HEPA grade or whole machine HEPA filtered. Even their replacement filters page doesn't specify. It's almost certainly not therefore. Even their cordless stick vac, Dyson clone, bandwagon jump product claims to be HEPA filtered but fails to specify the size range and capture efficiency. These are not the hallmarks of a reputable product, as discussed in this very review video. There's nothing about their products as advertised or the way they work that's impressive at all. You'd be better saving up and getting the next model, which looks to be radically different from their current models.
@@VacuumFacts Lol they haven't changed the design of their Majestic vacuum in decades. I highly doubt they're going to change it.
@@VacuumFacts Yeah I just looked at their website and they don't specify their filtration efficiency. Weird.
I don't think it's weird; they're a dodgy company. You'd withhold the full truth if you're trying to deceive potential customers.
@@VacuumFacts True. That and they expect people to pay $1,499 for the vacuum and $29.99 a year for their basic replacement filter package, and $79.98 a year for their premium filter replacement package. So in 5 years, $149.95 for the basic package, and $399.90 for the premium package. That's insane!
Hey I am a freelance video editor and animator from Nepal. I have experties in editing videos related to tech reviews. Would you consider giving me a chance to work with you? If yes then please give me a response.
Right out of the box, our Dyson Gen5Absolute had a rattle in the carpet cleaning head. Customer service conceded that the part is out of stock with no date for when it will be available (this is a HUGE problem with Dyson), so the unit had to be replaced. Dyson offered to ship us an exchange as soon as UPS received the defective unit. We recorded this conversation. Nevertheless, the next day, after we delivered the defective unit to UPS, customer service informed us that this was untrue. Dyson would not do an immediate exchange, but would ship a new unit only after it received and processed the unit, which would take up to 3 weeks (while Dyson sat on our money and the warranty triggered by our initial purchase continued to run.) In short, Dyson lied. I asked to speak with a supervisor and was assured that supervisor would call me back. No call. Dyson lied again. Even before we bought the unit, we got a bad taste of Dyson’s honesty. Customer service assured us that Dyson would price-match QVC’s sale price. This, too, proved to be untrue. Yet another lie. The vacuum may be great, but beware of Dyson. False assurances and unavailable replacement parts are a REAL problem.
This is actually something commonly observed now, and I fully believe absolutely everything you say. Dyson's 'award winning' customer service has fallen right off a cliff somehow and is utterly terrible now. Whoever is responsible for that division needs firing. You hit the nail on the head when you say "The vacuum may be great, but beware of Dyson". People who hate the facts I present have falsely claimed I'm a biased fanboy for years. Yet even I now would strongly recommend anyone think at least twice before buying any Dyson product, because the after-sales service (as of mid 2024) is truly dire, frustrating, and very very poor. I'd love to see what the rabid vacuum enthusiasts thought of that statement.
@@VacuumFacts They definitely need to address their customer service issues. That's going to hurt them in the long run, because people aren't going to invest in a high quality Dyson vacuum if they don't think that the company is going to back it up. I hope they resolve that problem soon.
@@VacuumFacts Do think its wise to buy additional coverage?
@@hurubi For what? Like those insurance offers. I've always thought they were a scam. Even out of warranty, you can get any spare modular parts for their cost value if ever needed. Additional coverage won't fix Dyson's spotty customer service now either.
I love how Samsung claims the Jet 90 has 27 cyclones, when there's actually only 9 cyclones with 3 openings for each cyclone for air to enter, but yet it clogged up in your flour pickup test, basically proving that their cheap knockoff of Dyson's Root Cyclone technology just doesn't match the separation efficiency that Dyson vacuums have. This reminds me of the "Do The Math" marketing Atari did for their Jaguar game console, claiming it had 64-bit graphics because it used 2 32-bit processors, but in reality, it wasn't 64 bit at all, compared to the Nintendo 64 game console.
Yup. You've got to watch the marketing types and fact check their half-truths. And yet I'm called 'biased' for pointing out things like this by people who champion feelings over facts. It's also not the number of cyclones that's important. In fact, Dyson's next model is reducing the number of cyclones in operation depending on flow current in a given mode to maximise their effectiveness. Marketing assume people are very, very stupid (which, for the most part, is sadly true due to a total failure of the state to educate in critical thinking) and suggest 'more' and 'bigger' is automatically better. Using less to achieve more is really what's better.
@@VacuumFacts Oh yeah I heard about what they're planning for the new model. That's pretty smart, considering that on a low power mode, trying to distribute the lesser airflow throughout all of the cyclones would mean more fine dust gets through, so having it shut off some of the cyclones to adapt is very clever.
I love how you're showing the truth unlike many people on Yt. This technology is amazing and I wish Dyson had kept on innovating or at least sell them here in the Uk in 2024. I regret not buying one when they came out, but, I have gotten my hand on one that a family member owned and they washed the cyclones out (witch shouldn't be done) and they didn't let it dry properly yet it still works and performs amazing. Goes to show that Dysons are built to last even when some are abused. Great video btw.
They discontinued it when moving to cordless for reasons discussed here kzread.info/dash/bejne/jGeBx8imedLaZrA.html
The issue I have with dyson apart from the price tag is the crappy build quality and materials used. They feel cheap, creak and are brittle.
You claimed they had "crappy build quality and materials", then relied on 'feelings' instead of evidence to support your claim. Your feelings are opposite to reality. They use the most advanced polymers around and are evidenced beyond all reasonable doubt to be durable, especially relative to the competition (see all the official durability testing videos online for a start). And then there's the warranty of 2 years, which is more than enough to show problems if it really is 'cheap, creaky and brittle'. This is a complete misconception, unsupported by evidence, and at odds with reality. The only thing you got right was the price tag. That's high because they are the best products on the market, as far as testing shows, and you get what you pay for. This video clearly evidenced this, as have many others.
Well I can't help it if you have low standards for build quality and want to masturbate over materials. Then again I find the build quality and materials on my 2021 Porsche 992 to be pretty crap too. Must be nice having low standards.
Again, you've made a factual claim about "low standards for build quality" but failed to evidence it in a manner than anyone respectable would take you seriously. You're in conflict with simple observations and seem to be getting offended when someone points this out to you and making purile suggestions. I recognise you think they use 'cheap materials' but there's no evidence of this, no evidence of poor build quality, and no evidence of increased failure rates. There is evidence of you being at odds with reality and thinking your subjective viewpoint trumps objective facts. Oh dear...
Lol... Happy masturbating with your dyson you nigel. That's the only suction you get it seems.
Doesn't seem like the self scraping shroud did a very good job cleaning the shroud at 15:04. I'm not hating, but just pointing it out. I just bought a V15 so I'm just watching reviews while waiting for it!
If extremely soiled like it was, a couple of swipes in all of 1 second clears it. Also, even if you don't, it's loosened so the air removes much of it. The purpose is to remove the accreted material so there's space for air to pass through. The brilliant design in the future models is fundamentally changing this as well to avoid the problem of shroud clogging entirely.
@@VacuumFactsAh, that makes sense. Do you have a video or link to information on the future models? I love seeing what Dyson comes up with!
No link because it's still being researched. But I've described it in the comments here kzread.info/dash/bejne/noukxq1rY5e-lrg.html
I agree with many others who commented. Dyson ball Cylinder corded are the best vacuums Dyson ever made (not the tall uprights but the standard looking ones like the big ball animal/ multifloor etc). If used with a Turbine brush and not the standard flat head it mostly comes with, it will beat anything on the matket. They have the best suction with deep clean and removes all hair. Avoid cordless as their batteries degrade, limited runtime, not much suction and very expensive that's why they have these gimmicks now like the green light to see crumbs on the floor and lcd screen to switch between normal and maximum power but u can't use normal as it doesn't pick anything up so u have to use max power but that isnt advised as battery and motor can't handle it. They sell the upright corded still but u can barely do one room as its really heavy to manoeuvre and exhausting and im over 6 ft and quite fit and still it ain't good as the discontinued ball cylinders. Its a big step backwards for Dyson
The cylinders didn't perform as well as the other formfactors, as the data shows. Having owned all, I can confirm the latest Dyson cordless cleaners are considerably beyond their mains powered machines. They have comparable performance using much less power (as the data clearly shows), are far easier to use, facilitate bite-sized cleaning, are easier to empty, quieter, and have much better HEPA filtration. The shortcomings you emphasise are simply not a problem in practical use in typical homes. Furthermore, post 2025 when the new battery technology revolution starts, they'll be quantum leaped again. The new design features in the next generation of cordless coming are very impressive.
Achetez plutôt un bon aspirateur, bien plus puissant et fiable, et qui n'a pas besoin LUI d'être sans cesse nettoyé....Dyson de la merde !
This is not a fair review Because the Dyson has a motorized Floor head That by itself does better cleaning a carpet regardless of the machine Compare to a straight section cleaner yes vacuum with a brush roll would clean better But Henry is just a straight straight suction vacuum So therefore the tests Are not fair
It's a perfectly fair review because both are vacuum cleaners designed to vacuum floors. One works well, the other doesn't. You correctly identified why. One is sold to you with poorer technology, like a non-motorised floorhead, thereby making the job less effective for your money. That's what a review is; comparing the two as sold. And then there's literally everything else important, discussed in the video, that your comment didn't seem to acknowledge...
So are you basically saying the only vacuum in the world isn't Dyson?The only type of action that can actually clean youbecause a Fifty dollar a vacuum from walmart or a grocery store can easily outperform a dyson In the regards of deep cleaning dirt out of a pile of the carpet I could even prove it
I don't understand your first sentence because it doesn't make any sense. If you can send the professionally -acquired data, ensuring it's independently verified by a reputable source, demonstrating "a Fifty dollar a vacuum from walmart or a grocery store can easily outperform a dyson", then I'll take a look. Otherwise, I don't believe you. And then there's literally everything else to consider that you haven't mentioned.
I had ordered the v15 and it is on its way to me but this review made me order the gen5 as well 😂😂 guess I will be returning the v15 😂
I think this money is not given to this machine, I bought gen5, but unfortunately, my advice to those who will buy it until everything is bought should read the complaints, there are those who have a lot of victimisation. I've been waiting for a carpet cap for about 2 months.
You don't sound like a very nice person. People are allowed to disagree with you without being called stupid. Dyson are crap, you're just trying to convince yourself they're good 😂 or you have shares in dyson 🧐
Of course people can disagree. Except on factual matters, which are true or false, on which there's evidence bearing, if people disagree with what's shown to be true, then they ARE stupid. Something you failed to recognise. I recognise you think Dyson machines are crap. I disagree, relative to other machines. And unless you can evidence why convincingly, in a way that doesn't show you are at odds with reality, then you won't change any minds here. You're also falling victim to the stupidity of confusing between stating facts that suggest something positive about a company's product and being some kind of tribal fanboy.
It was a huge mistake to stop developing these in parallel to cordless models. Cordless vacuums can never replace corded models for a number of reasons all of which being physics related. One can't change the laws of physics. Both designs have their strengths and weaknesses and should be used for the right task.
What are the 'physics' reasons you claim that a cordless machine can't replace a corded machine, precisely? The rest of your comment is at odds with reality of course, and the empirical evidence is all over my channel.
@@VacuumFacts By design cordless vacuums are top heavy and have very limited runtime and capacity and you can't increase either of these without making them very uncomfortable to use due to their weight. For instance can feel all that weight in your hand even on their relatively light and most popular V15. I'm not even talking about outsize models, as they are virtually unusable for most people. So there's pretty nothing nothing you can do about it, as you can't make cordless vacuum bottom heavy. It will simply hinder their versatility. In fact according to many users and many reviews the only cordless Dyson that is not cumbersome to use is V12 and it's very limited by its bin capacity. But it has very small bin and not as good for carpets cleaning. All their relatively light models are limited by only 60min runtime at min power. On practice no one is going to use it at min power, so the actual runtime is going to be even less, than that. And so cleaning a large house with cordless vacuum is not practical. It's only suitable for small or relatively clean spaces that don't require much cleaning. Corded vacuums on the other hand always have been and always will be more suitable for large spaces that require long cleaning sessions. And didn't even mention how ineffective modern battery technologies are and that drawing power directly from the wall is always much more effective and doesn't require wasting time on recharge or money on a new battery that inevitably going to lose its capacity and rather sooner than later.
>>”Cordless vacuum runtime and capacity are very limited by design and you can't increase either of these without increasing its weight and making it very uncomfortable to use.” Run time is determined by the power consumption and battery capacity. Poorly designed machines with weak and inferior technology require large heavy batteries and multiple of them to get decent runtimes. It has been established with good design that you can have run times sufficient to perform typical cleaning sessions with performance greater than even good mains machines without large weights. There is thus plenty of evidence showing that cordless can replace mains cleaners. As for bin capacity, the capacity in good designs is enough to last for a cleaning session and the emptying in said good designs takes 5 seconds without mess, making it superior to even the best mains machine emptying methods. Again, this conflicts with the suggestion that mains machines can’t replace cordless-at least when referring to best in class of each. >>”Pair this with the fact that cordless vacuums are top heavy and quite have already. You can feel all that weight in your hand much more than with bottom heavy corded models or canister vacuums that have most of the weight in a separate block altogether.” When used on floor, it is false to suggest you can feel the weight in your hand much more. The lower mass of (good) cordless machines also reduces inertia, making it feel much lighter to push than bottom-heavy mains machines. For above floor cleaning, good cordless machines (that have enough power to clean with simultaneous long run times) are typically 3 kg or less. The best machines are not overly tiring to use above floor and the much greater ease of use than corded machine is a much better use case. Furthermore, next gen battery technology looking to be released in late 2025 will quite revolutionise cordless cleaners. >> “runtime is only 60min at min power, which on practice is not going to be effective to use, especially if there's a lot of dirty carpets.” This is a misunderstanding consigned to the bin long ago. You can get a run time in auto mode enough to complete a reasonable cleaning session with performance superior to even good mains machines. People don’t like the whole-house mega clean chore anymore and habits have evolved now into bite-sized cleaning, which this formfactor champions. Run time is simply not a good argument anymore. >> “…cleaning a large house with cordless vacuum is not practical. It's only suitable for small or relatively clean spaces that don't require much cleaning.” This is complete nonsense as well. We bite size cleaning now and you can do a large house, as plenty of people show online >>”Corded vacuums on the other hand always have been and always will be more suitable for large spaces that require long cleaning sessions.” This is again false. Cordless machines are used in commercial environments quite successfully, conflicting badly with your claim. Weight, bin capacity, and run time tropes are your primary justifications for cordless not being able to replace corded. These have been debunked many years ago. Also, I’m still missing these ‘physics reasons’ you referred to (distinct from correct language associated with physical properties and practicalities of use).
@@VacuumFacts I gave you simple facts and reasons with real world examples of Dyson's own models, but you seem to be one of those mindless Dyson fanboys, that accept only facts in their own favor and discard all the rest. I can only wish you and your "facts" channel good luck. You gonna need it.
I simply didn't agree with your factual claims because they doesn't stand up to scrutiny. You appear to have ignored the details of what I gave you the respect to respond to, then took offense seemingly because the nonsense you claimed was well-challenged in a manner that made sense, and exposed your subjective wonky worldview. Instead you've now fallen back on a bizarre, tribal, form of anti-Dyson racism-like behaviour that constantly litters this place.
No amount of technology can prevent idiots from using it wrong and claiming it doesn't work.
Did everything in the video exactly (and I mean EXACTLY) as iterated - didn’t fix the problem at all. What a waste of time. Lame video.
Don't believe you because that makes no sense.
@@VacuumFacts believe me or don’t - the facts are the facts. Do better next time, buddy.
What facts? You didn't present any. Where's the data? How do you explain your observations in detail that makes sense? This is why no one sensible would believe your wild statement that contradicts actual observation. Do better next time, buddy.
@@VacuumFacts facts: followed your silly little guide and this Dyson still smells like ass. Data: the Dyson smells like ass. Observations in detail: despite following step by step recommendations in video, the Dyson still smells like ass. Supporting data: several other comments state the same exact results (one with 19 upvotes nonetheless!). Conclusion: your video is useless and a waste of time. Need anything else?
@@VacuumFacts Facts: my Dyson smelled like mildew. I followed every little suggestion in your silly video step by step. It still smells exactly the same as before. Data: this vacuum still smells like mildew. Observations in detail: the vacuum cleaner still smells the exact same as it did before I followed this guide. Supporting research (several other comments, including one with 17 upvotes) points to strong evidence that this video does not provide a solution. Conclusion: this video is a useless waste of time. Need anything else?
Bags are crap, You on drugs?
Video shows why. You on drugs?
@@VacuumFacts because you said so?
@@CB19087 No, because the evidence showed it. It was in the video.
Who cares how much is not captured to what micron level when central vacuum is pulling ALL the dirt out to your garage canister...anything lost is in your garage, not your house like all other vacuums. Seriously you are going to compare the amount of power used as a reason to not buy a central vacuum? Who cares, it's not even a dime to vacuum your house in power to get all the dust and allergens outside of your home, while your HEPA filter fails because it's dirty and puts it back into your home. I owned a Dyson Animal, and it wasn't anywhere near as long lasting and a quality build of my central vacuum system. If its about efficiencies and money, go buy a Eureka Hepa upright for $79, and save yourself all the expense of a Dyson, put that savings into an investment earning 10% and you will be way ahead.
These are unconvincing, short-sighted arguments debunked long ago. You show such staggering ignorance, I can only assume you're a 'central vac fan'. The idea that a "HEPA filter fails because it's dirty and puts it back into your home" is so dripping with total ignorance of how they work, it's literally not worth me investing time ridiculing this comment anymore. Way to ignore the points raised in the video or brush them off unconvincingly.
Testing in a lab is all well and good but if own and use these things regularly over a long time you get the real picture. Mr Henry has never let me down and he's always smiling and that's good enough for me.
Representative lab testing has value. I test in my home and get a similarly real picture. Everything pointed out in this video is what you get when using it in the home. I believe you when you say your Henry has never let you down. But then there's literally everything else raised in the Henry product review videos to consider beyond reliability alone. If it's still good enough for you, that's great. But the point of my channel is to point out the whole picture that is otherwise hidden behind half-truths so innocent people are not misled and know the full truth before making their own independent decisions.
Filters are a pain, stops the vacuum and then you have to wait to wash and dry them to continue, bags for me.
The cleaners that use bags have filters too. The bags are filters themselves. What you're advocating here is a throwaway, disposable, polluting, and a costly way of working that's wholly avoidable. If it wasn't that the machine cost more money than bags, you'd probably just throw the entire machine into landfill and get another when it was full. The best cyclonic bagless machines (namely the patented original design), if treated correctly, rarely need to have their filters washed because they're a last line of defense that hardly sees any of the dirt. Plenty of evidence for this, e.g. here kzread.info/dash/bejne/hmek1LqLXcTLf8o.html . What you're revealing here is either that most bagless clones are terrible and sully the original idea, as discussed here kzread.info/dash/bejne/h5OltZSiZqu3grw.html, or you are unable to muster the small effort to rinse a filter once in a blue moon, which is made easy as discussed here kzread.info/dash/bejne/g4iHw8aInZm9o6w.html . And then there's literally every other problem and drawback of bagged machines you've glossed over, as discussed here kzread.info/dash/bejne/oqiCks2kf9etg7A.html and evidenced in this very video seemingly ignored (or you were incapable of appreciating) that you think an ultra rare filter rinse is worse than. None of this makes you look good.
@@VacuumFacts I am going with my experience with a Dyson, got so fed up with it suddenly stopping because of the filter it just wasn't worth it. Numatic cleaners last much longer and if you are really worried about the environment you can also stick your finger in the bag and empty it.
I don't believe it suddenly stopped because of the filter. That makes no sense. The only way it would 'suddenly stop' because of a filter is if it's completely blocked. The only way it would block to that extent on a Dyson is through complete neglect, as evidenced beyond all reasonable doubt in basic testing ( kzread.info/dash/bejne/p6l6krNpqJa2aKg.html ), let alone an understanding of the associated science. Plenty of evidence filters don't block e.g. kzread.info/dash/bejne/hmek1LqLXcTLf8o.html . A bag is the exact same as a filter (except in the original cyclonic system, it's a last line of defense that sees virtually nothing under correct usage). So, if a Dyson 'suddenly stops', then a bag will 'suddenly stop' too since it's the same thing. And arguing Numatic cleaners last much longer is nonsense and unsupported by any reputable evidence. The idea you can empty a bag by sticking your finger in there is silly, since it doesn't remove the blocking micro particles, as evidenced here kzread.info/dash/bejne/g4iHw8aInZm9o6w.html and in performance testing in this video. None of this makes any sense and then there's literally every other problem and drawback of bagged machines you've glossed over, as discussed here kzread.info/dash/bejne/oqiCks2kf9etg7A.html and evidenced in this very video. I've seen all this before. You like Numatic and dislike Dyson at a cosmetic, subjective level. That's fine. But nonsensical factual claims will be called out here.
This was the most helpful video. I luckily had some talkum powder on hand.
Thanks for all your reviews. I’ve already decided not to buy the vacuum I was going to buy. Trouble is, now I’ve watched several of your videos, I’m not sure which one will be best for my needs. I’m sold on a Dyson (obvs) but not sure I need to buy the latest /greatest as it’s just for quick clean ups and to take away in the camper. If you don’t mind my asking, would you recommend something like a V11 for this kind of use (as it’s now cheaper than when it first came out), or should I spend more money on a more recent model? Tia for your advice.
All their products are best in class for its generation and are still beyond the competition, as the data shows. The more recent models do it quicker/more easily/generally better because there's tech in there to improve things. An older one like the V11 will be good and similar and cost less. Just have to look at the features each model offers and decide what suits your budget.
Thanks for the insight buyimg extra stuff everytime is a scam I say like you said can you do a review of the vax onepwr blade 5 I'm thinking of getting one
I'm unlikely to review that model because there's no interesting or novel technology in there. The specifications provided and the technology are clearly substantially inferior to the best products on the market. It's therefore not competing in the same market space and is clearly intending to be a lower cost knock-off. It'll work, just not anything like as well.
Does the cyclone increase the suction ? And airflow
No that's not how they work. The motor determines the suction. The magnitude of airflow in the context seen talked about on YT is not directly relevant for reasons I'll do a video on in the future. Watch out for all sources that say it is important. They lack knowledge of basic science, as will be revealed, and cannot be trusted, no matter what they say. Cyclones resist the flow of air but the motor is tuned to compensate to achieve the desired aerodynamic properties at the cleaner head where dirt removal occurs. Their function is to separate particles from the air.
So why does a Kirby leave the wood floor under my carpet clean, while everything else leaves a ton of dust under the carpet?
It's not possible to know without any meaningful information and data. However, all possibilities are covered in several of my videos under the kirby kzread.info/head/PLBxUOcW7kaEs7xuTK2A-pncwupMjXuRbb and educational playlists kzread.info/head/PLBxUOcW7kaEvk3bygbiP56Fw3UtLog_p_
is it worth it for $783 or still considered as overpriced?
"Considered overpriced" is subjective. It's better than anything else by far and therefore costs more than anything else. The rest have cut corners and produced a less good product. They charge almost as much. You get what you pay for in this case. It's for an individual to determine whether they wish to spend this amount of money to get the best product of this class on the market by all meaningful, objective measures. Alternatively, they can pay much less and get much less. I bought this product with my own money. I thought it was extremely expensive. Luckily, I could afford it. I think every penny was well spent and would buy it again if ever needed. I've tried the cheaper products. They're cheaper for a reason and I wouldn't buy them again.
@@VacuumFacts Thank you. I have seen quite a few reviews showing that on bare floor at least, there is actually almost no difference between the G5 and even the supposedly weaker and cheaper V12
That's probably true. Bare floors without crevices are relatively simple to clean. An antistatic technology and a means to ensure small and large particles can be brought into the cleaner head are the key features needed, and both products have those. Carpets require more advanced technology to clean well.
@@VacuumFacts So it is safe to say that the Gen5 has no significant advantage over the V12 for instance, when it comes to a house with 99% bare floors other than larger bin and a little longer battery?
The Gen5Detect has more air power, so can extract dirt from deeper cracks if you have any. It has a higher grade HEPA filter if you suffer allergies. And it has a larger bin and longer run time, but a bit more weight. Otherwise, for hard floors, they'll be comparable. However, the next gen machines coming out (possibly soon) might be worth waiting for.
AIR not hair
I was going to get one of these but was concerned over having to put a new bag in every time you emptied it. I have to empty mine every time i hoover. I've 5 dogs so this would work out expensive for me to get
Yeah. And then there's everything else poor about it in the video.
I feel like this guy was paid by dyson to defend their bad design. I bought a vacuum used from someone and I tried all cleaning tricks under the sun and it still smelled. Basically every part that touched the air smelled. I had to take apart the cyclone and soaked it in soapy water over night and air dried it for a couple days to reduce the smell. The smell is still there but not as strong.
I feel like this guy is a paid anti-dyson shill who will just say the opposite of what's shown to be true with correct usage in the video. You took a used and no doubt abused product and almost certainly didn't do what was specified in the video, did things you're not supposed to do, and then complain it still smells. Probably didn't correctly rinse the filter, probably didn't use microsponges...and so on. Yawn
Mind is still under warranty and yet they told me to change the motor need to pay for rm1k + which ty said the motor still function not warranty for it😅