Glad you're back and still making vids!

Nice and informative video 🙂 thank you.

@VacuumFacts

2 жыл бұрын

This was hard work and took a long time (and was expensive...). But finding the truth is always hard work.

The fact that you are giving up potentially 10s of £1000s to provide comprehensive, unbiased performance analyses of mainstream vacuum cleaner products is truly remarkable.

@VacuumFacts

2 жыл бұрын

Not just giving up money; it's actually costing me to review these machines. I do this because I care about what's true. I was called to arms, as it were, by the nasty bunch of 'rabid vacuum enthusiasts' out there who are disturbingly tribal and seemingly undereducated. They confuse (or wilfully portray) their subjective opinions as objective facts and someone needed to counter that with a dose of reality. This channel's myth-busting content has fact-checked and exposed the often dirty tricks used to mislead innocent viewers. All they've got left now is 'offense'-taking and smear attempts.

What an excellent video I wish there were more like this out there. I have one myself and agree it is very cumbersome putting on the tools etc however, I am a fan of bags but, having seen your video I am considering a dyson as I will be having more carpets fitted. However, tried one in a store once and found the dust smell blew out at my face because of the positioning of the vents. That was a few years ago though so maybe they have improved that aspect and it was a shop demo.

@VacuumFacts

Жыл бұрын

When vacuuming the floor, the exhaust doesn't blow in your face. If it's above floor cleaning, it could, but you can easily change the angle to avoid that. And the exhaust air is now fully HEPA filtered to higher standards than any other machine on the market that I'm aware of, and so will be cleaner than the air you normally breath. The latest flagship cordless (Absolute+) and the new 'Detail cleaning kit' is the best performing and easiest thing I've ever used by far. You can always take advantage of their 35-day money back guarantee so you can effectively try before you commit to buy.

Over 9 months since previous upload... Why didn't you upload more often anymore?

@VacuumFacts

2 жыл бұрын

For some reason, you're assuming I'm an entertainment channel. I'm not. And I upload when there's something relevant to upload.

@absoluterainbow

2 жыл бұрын

@@VacuumFacts Oh ok. I was just asking.

@absoluterainbow

2 жыл бұрын

@@VacuumFacts And by the way, my favorite vacuum cleaners overall are the latest cordless vacuums Dyson, full stop.

Dyson fact: To sufficiently implement Kinetic on their cordless vacuum, Dyson needs more powerful motor to make it work effectively. For a motor to be more powerful, it needs more power. And if you want more power, you need a better battery that can handle all the power. It's the battery that's the main limitation of the current Dyson cordless vacuum cleaners, and therefore, it's probably the last thing needed to allow Dyson to implement the Kinetic tips from some of their final main vacuums into their new cordless vacuum.

@VacuumFacts

2 жыл бұрын

Your comment is completely off-topic and incorrect. My Cinetic videos explain things correctly. kzread.info/dash/bejne/jGeBx8imedLaZrA.html In summary, better cyclonic filtration is achieved with greater volumetric airflow. This is already achieved with their market-leading ultra-power-dense digital motors, so you're simply wrong to suggest "Dyson needs more powerful motor". The Achilles' heel is actually the Li-ion battery technology, which lacks capacity (energy density / specific energy) to sustain the powers necessary to provide mains-like volumetric flows for long enough in a convenient handheld formfactor.

I wonder how their corded model would perform compared to this one. My family had the kobold VK200.

@VacuumFacts

2 жыл бұрын

Likely better or on par with the cordless' boost mode. But with all the drawbacks mentioned within this review and those of other corded models. Not worth me reviewing.

Can you review the vk7 model by vorwerk? Are there improvements or advancements that come with it?

@VacuumFacts

9 ай бұрын

Unlikely. It's possible to extract conclusions based on the review of the VB100. Much of the design approach and technology is the same-and not very good compared to what's out there.

Have you ever vacuumed a hardfoor twice to test how much dust is left? I experienced with my cylinder vacuum with a hardfloor head that some dust remains after the second cleaning and emptening the bin. Even than i clean thoroughly the first time still some dust remains. I think this happens because a cylinder vacuum blows air close to the ground and some dust fly away so not all can be sucked in the first time. I think this is the main reason. The second reason is maybe that the non rotating head cleans not so thoroughly like a rotating head. What do you think?

@VacuumFacts

2 жыл бұрын

I vacuum once and see how much is left, as shown in several videos now. Good, modern vacuums leave nothing behind. The best ones can tackle all reasonable dirt across all floor types without any head switching.

Wow I’m amazed at the design of this considering the hefty cost especially the mini motorised head! It’s like they’re having a laugh Btw a couple of questions- 1) Did you keep the ball Animal 2? If so I’m curious as to why 2) what’s your predictions about the next cordless Dyson and the sources?

@VacuumFacts

2 жыл бұрын

Yes, except look at all those idiots out there (the rabid vacuum enthusiast types) who were banging on and on, without evidence, about how good the Vorwek machines were compared to the V15. As usual, they're at odds with reality and once again, it took me to show it, given everyone else on the entirety of YT utterly failed to. 1) Yes because boost mode for pre-cleaning for testing purposes would drain the battery I need for testing the V15 machine. I otherwise never use it and I may get rid of it as battery tech improves. 2) Prediction: world's first major consumer product solid state battery; google dyson solid state battery production. Otherwise, no idea. And look at the performance of the V15. I should have measured the eco and boost performance in its review. I just assumed there were no significant performance changes, but I was completely wrong. I'll hopefully not make that mistake again. Boost mode is insane.

@parwaz7861

2 жыл бұрын

@@VacuumFacts Awesome, my V15 has really impressed me as well with its performance. It’s deffo better than a Kirby I got the Avalir with the latest style emptor and stiffer brushbar so it’s basically their most powerful one and I’ve been using that daily for a while till I got fed up of it. Then I went back to using the V15 and the brushbar got insanely dusty with fine dust and even here and there it just boosts the suction cos it knows the carpet is dusty regardless of how well I vacuumed with the Kirby. They’re overrated I really hope the solid state battery comes out in the next model that would be a huge leap forward on its own. I presume they’ll launch the new model sometime this month seeing as they usually do in March along with how they just dropped the v10 from their website

@VacuumFacts

2 жыл бұрын

You only need to look back at the worst of the bad actors on YT out there, who right from the V10 launch, claimed they weren't mains replacements. Not only has the data shown time and again they're deluded, but the V15 is one of the best performing machines out there of any machine (albeit in boost), showing that cordless can not only match, but exceed most mains performance. In auto mode (when detecting dirt to boost it temporarily), it exceeds Turbo head Henry mains performance. The V15 is the best machine I've ever used, and I was quite hostile to it initially over the V11.

@parwaz7861

2 жыл бұрын

@@VacuumFacts I’d love to see you test out the auto and eco mode of the V15 on + mode of the head, I’ve noticed the particle counter number on mine rises faster on eco mode which surprised me, not sure if it really cleans better than auto mode or if the particle counter was able to count the particles better due to the lower airflow of eco mode

@VacuumFacts

2 жыл бұрын

@@parwaz7861 I did; it's in the plot in this very video. The particle counter accuracy is only calibrated for auto mode, apparently. And unless you controlled the material in the carpet very carefully (as I do), then it means nothing which mode got more counts and faster.

The main advantage with any bagged cleaner is that you do not have to clean the filters - the bag is the filter. Every bagless cleaner on the market requires the filters to be cleaned regularly which are always full of dust (otherwise you will loose suction).

@VacuumFacts

Жыл бұрын

Yes, except bagged cleaners still have filters, but we'll ignore that, right. Furthermore, what you've said is a half-truth, and the unspoken counterpart is discussed here kzread.info/dash/bejne/oqiCks2kf9etg7A.html . It turns out that 'advantage' you speak of (which again, isn't quite true) comes with lots of inherent disadvantages-namely ongoing running costs, huge environmental impact when scaled up across a nation, the need to manage having more bags in stock, the hassle of changing them, the loss of suction as fine dust accumulates, accumulation of foul odours, running costs if you buy perfumes to mask the smell and so on. The cheap knock-off Dyson clones primarily rely on filters for fine dust and so, yes, they do clog awfuly and are terrible products. This is not true for the original bagless cleaner; Dyson's cyclones relegate the filter to be a last line of defense, and requires rinsing relatively infrequently (mainly if odours accumulate), as shown here kzread.info/dash/bejne/hmek1LqLXcTLf8o.html , and that only takes a day (or less if you have a cool fan). So there's far, far more to the situation than was trivialised in your comment.

Where you can buy kobold in U.S?

@VacuumFacts

11 ай бұрын

I'm not sure. I recommend a website called "Google" which may be able to help in the first instance. You can type in questions like this and it searches the entire web for answers. Web search technology is quite useful, although it's only been around for 33 years.

Can you please do milwaukee fuel m12 and m18

@VacuumFacts

Жыл бұрын

o_0 those are drills

@VacMaster1991

Жыл бұрын

@@VacuumFacts They do make vacuums. I have the M18 6 gallon. shop vac and its pretty fantastic! Milwaukee also makes a stick vac I want to try.

@VacuumFacts

Жыл бұрын

@@VacMaster1991 Unless there's a strong technological reason to do so, I'm not likely to pay much attention to any old bit of kit.

In my V15 review ( kzread.info/dash/bejne/oKN3rtmRc7mqo84.html ), I regret not bothering to measure the performance of eco and boost modes. They had clearly improved the technology and performance of the machine and I overlooked it! Eco mode, with the front gates closed, performs stunningly well, and you get ~75 mins out of it with a single battery. And boost mode shocked me with its performance-outperforming the ball animal 2 final mains cleaner, which had been formally measured in independent industry standard testing as having the best cleaning performance on the market! That auto mode (with reactive suction) produces cleaning performance better than a typical good mains cleaner, really shows how far Dyson's cordless technology has come and how staggeringly beyond the competition they are. I really regret not including this in the V15 review.

@parwaz7861

2 жыл бұрын

So is eco mode of the v15 with the head on + mode good enough to be on par with the latest dyson ball uprights? Cos on auto mode if I use that with the gates shut then the brushbar slows down on my medium pile carpets and even some thin pile carpets too, I wish the brushbar motors had more torque to prevent themselves slowing down so I’ve been using the v10 head on my v15 lately The suction is great, it’s just the brushbar motor that can’t handle the suction sometimes and I’d rather close the gates on the head for a deeper clean I know the v10 head has vents on the front but the brushbar spins at an adequate speed constantly

@VacuumFacts

2 жыл бұрын

@@parwaz7861 Eco+ mode does not perform as well as the Ball 2 (final) mains machine (see graph in video). Clamping suggests airflow restriction limitations driven by the pile, drawing the carpet into the head too much to impair the brushbar. Such carpets are airflow-limiting in a way increasing suction can't compensate for. So, auto/boost won't necessarily improve performance, nor will more torque, which will just increase wear on the brush bar and carpet. Might want to check the carpets are pinned down properly and also taut enough to prevent them lifting into the head too much.

@hifriend783

2 жыл бұрын

Thanks for sharing this update with us!

What happened to your first Dyson v15

@VacuumFacts

2 жыл бұрын

Dyson made the mistake of not launching their V15 product line variants at once. I wanted the top model, so, like many, apparently, I returned the original and got the complete model. I was going to do a video on it but it only came with a light pipe which isn't that amazing because the light is too intense in one spot like a laser, and the HEPA filter media seemed the same (supporting some rumours it was, but not 100% sure). So I've had it since about 1 day after I launched the V15 review video. I may do a 1 year update, but not sure there's any point. Summary: it's amazing, the best cleaner I've ever used, performs better than anything I've ever measured, and I was wrong to be skeptical about the value of the changes it introduced over the V11.

@Darijo.m

2 жыл бұрын

@@VacuumFacts I have my V15 absolute for 5 months now and it is amazing and before the V15 I used the V8 and it was amazing to. You convinced me to buy the V15 😂. I didn’t get the complete model because I didn’t really like the gold color. All in all Dyson vacuums are amazing.

@VacuumFacts

2 жыл бұрын

@@Darijo.m I think performance wise, there's no difference. The filter may (or may not) be different, but practically, it's difficult to even tell. The light pipe is not something I'd miss if I didn't have it (I'd miss it more if it had better distributed light).

@Darijo.m

2 жыл бұрын

@@VacuumFacts If the filter is green then it is a better filter if not then it is the same. The light pipe is always something that you can buy separately but I don’t see a need for that in my house.

Just saved me so much money thank you! 😊

@VacuumFacts

Жыл бұрын

Thanks. Although, all I really did is present facts and the full truth and people made their own minds up independently.

I recently replaced my V11 with the vorwerk VB100. Whilst I understand many points you make, I have to say for day to day cleaning the vorwerk is far easier to live with. It’s more comfortable to use, more hygienic to empty. It suites my cleaning needs far more than the dyson did. My mother paid £750 for her vorwerk (corded) back in 2010 and it’s still going strong. I’ve been through 4 dyson a in that time, after a year or so fall apart, likely due to the cheap plastic parts. For what I’ve spent on dysons over the last 12 years (estimating around £1500), and what has gone into landfill, I just wish I’d spent my money wisely first time round. I admire your love for dyson, but they are no longer for me or a brand I’d recommend.

@VacuumFacts

Жыл бұрын

Each to his own. The objective facts evidenced in the video paint a different picture to the one you favour. I've seen no evidence whatsoever that after a year a Dyson falls apart...neglect and abuse aside. The 'plastic' parts aren't 'cheap' (whatever that means) and are sophisticated durable blends taking advantage of the latest knowledge of materials science... actually why am I bothering...

I haven't seen enough of a difference over the V10 I have to update to the V15.

@VacuumFacts

2 жыл бұрын

I probably wouldn't have done had it not been for the demand to review them. Although, I glad I did to some extent, retrospectively, because the V15 is better than the V10.

@Boodieman72

2 жыл бұрын

@@VacuumFacts Dyson's USA site is out of stock on a lot of products including the V15.

@VacuumFacts

2 жыл бұрын

@@Boodieman72 They're either selling like hotcakes still and / or there's supply issues for who knows what reasons.

@JamiTheFox

2 жыл бұрын

@@VacuumFacts it’s supply issues

Agree with all of this, £700 for a not fab mainly floors only machine (the advertising where they show its above floor cleaning made me laugh when it first came out) is nuts, makes the v15 seem reasonably priced! I had a vk200 corded model in my hands recently and it was a disappointment too, flimsy, narrow air paths and tiny expensive bags.

@VacuumFacts

2 жыл бұрын

Yeah, I almost reviewed the VK200, but after this one, I just lost all hope and wrote it off. Nevertheless, it's the best non-Dyson cordless out there in terms of performance, as the data showed, but the upright formfactor makes it a nightmare for above floor cleaning. Shockingly overpriced, which is a wonderful example of how regressive capitalism steals the good, working ideas of pioneers, kludges them to avoid patent protection, and produces a monstrosity that they can charge a comparable price for. It's amazing also how each of the Kobold's power modes was essentially one mode down on the Dyson's equivalent for performance. And you get longer run times for each on the Dyson. This only happens because of the advancements in the core technologies (namely their incredible motor). And to never clog or need throwaway filters (i.e. a bag), assuming no abuse, is a no-brainer. I really appreciate good design which has clear, measureable benefits. I'm still amazed the V15 in boost outperforms anything I've tested. That really shows off their amazing tiny motor's power density. Having said that, if Dyson didn't exist, the Kobold would probably be my top pick. Fortunately Dyson does exist, and I'm hoping they'll revolutionise battery technology in the next gen and lead where others are left to copy-less effectively. If only Dyson had some genuine technological competition I could admire; I wouldn't get accused of bias so much for stating observable facts.

@beko1987

2 жыл бұрын

Older vorwerk are more fun. They loose their value so fast it's more fun waiting 3-4 years and spending a fraction of the cost. Dysons hold their value much more (assuming they've not been trashed). I got £380 for my out of warranty, although with a new main body and new torque head v11 when I sold it, which was decent

@beko1987

2 жыл бұрын

Tineco pull that power stunt as well, I've got a few now and their basically identical bar the power modes. Had a moan to them about it but I doubt it'll do much, just made me recommend the cleaner they didn't want me too as it started up on a more sensible default setting

@VacuumFacts

2 жыл бұрын

@@beko1987 I have thought of reviewing a Tineco; I even rejected a free review product at one point. But based on my testing experiences now, I was put off just looking at the specifications; it's clear it's not particularly different to any of the other Dyson clones. The motor isn't as advanced, it's heavier and more power guzzling, so they'll have a smaller battery to keep weight down and therefore shorter run times-which feeds back to lower power in each mode and reduced cleaning performance. Compromise after compromise. It's cheaper, but a regressive capitalism copycat clone by definition, rather than genuinely better tech they really researched and developed to be best in class and push boundaries forward. Even the V10 is cheaper and likely much better performing given none of the others measure to give mains-equivalence. IMO: if someone's going to go cordless, save up and get a unit which actually works far better; don't fall victim to regressive capitalism or false economy.

@beko1987

2 жыл бұрын

Even after being brutally honest with the s12 I got given first they keep offering me things so I don't think they watch the videos! I do like them, for the price their pretty good although the pre motor filters clogs up far too fast. The hard floor washer is brilliant though, easily my most used appliance and it's lasted 2 years so far, which did amaze me a bit as they do feel cheap. Having seen a slew of v10 and v11 issues over the last 6 months I think all modern vacs/stuff is as bad as each other, Dyson need to keep their patents closed source for sure, it's what keeps them on top as no other company puts the ££ into the R&D, and it does show. I just wish Dyson didn't make them as cheaply as possible, but equally that's capitalism, and it works for them! I'm just not a fan of stick vacs in general I've found, which is a shame as 99% of everything is a stick. What isn't is usually flawed in some way, especially if it's got a vax logo on it

Nnot that good in English... So he recommends Dyson 15 over Vorwerk?

@VacuumFacts

2 жыл бұрын

I don't recommend either in the video. I present the evidence that allows a potential buyer to make an informed decision with the full facts available to them, rather than a cherrypicked subset the manufacturers would like you to only see. Look at the data and listen to the information about practicality and running costs etc. Everything needed is in the video, although I appreciate if English isn't a viewer's first language it will be more difficult. The data in the plots however does not require verbal language.

@HCG

2 жыл бұрын

The Dyson is objectively better based on his data. If you want the better vacuum, buy the V15

The Dyson would definitely be the better choice out of those two. Clearly a high price does not necessarily equal good performance. Tbh, even £600 for a vacuum is expensive, considering you can get a multi-cyclonic Vax Mach air for about £100 which would meet the needs of most people. And for the commercial environment, you could get a Numatic for that sort of price, which would meet their needs too. The Dyson's and Vorwerk's high price and gimmicks are suited to customers with a lot of disposable income I would think, where they are got as more of a fashion statement and to show off, rather than purchased purely for their technology at offer (however pointless... ahem "laser detect").

@VacuumFacts

2 жыл бұрын

Maybe. You get what you pay for I guess, and 'top end' isn't something everyone desires. Then again, most households have a Dyson so...

@timconnell5878

2 жыл бұрын

The laser attachment works great on dark hardwood floors. Only wished they offered a wider attachment as I have alot of hardwood floors. Great and informative video.

@orbiktech6746

2 жыл бұрын

@@timconnell5878 I mean, when I vacuum I vacuum all of the floor regardless and it doesn't work for carpets.

@orbiktech6746

2 жыл бұрын

@@VacuumFacts Most households probably won't have a Dyson that was made in the past 3 years I would think. There are a hell of a lot of old Dysons still going strong such as a DC03 I know of still in use! That was back in the day when Dysons were much more affordable compared to other machines sold at the time.

@VacuumFacts

2 жыл бұрын

@@orbiktech6746 TBF, I probably wouldn't either if it wasn't for the demands here to review them. I don't exactly enjoy spending that much money.

Its very interesting to see how cordless vacuum cleaner have significantly increased in price over the few past years! Dyson made first step and all other brands followed. A few years ago you wouldnt even think on spending 700€ for a vacuum cleaner, regardless if its mains powered or not. This whole Marketing settings reminds me on the phone market: Apple made expensive Cellphones, Samsung followed with the price, chinese brands entered market with lower prices and as they gained marekt share, rasied prices to. Its the same game here IMHO!!! You will not find a high end cordless vacuum cleaner für under 300€! Miele Triflex, Samsung Bespoke Jet, Tineco S12 etc. all are in the same Price region like the Dyson. An yes DYSON has the BEST cyclonic Filtration. It keeps the Pre- and Post Motor Filter almost clean! As far as I know, now other brand can do this with the effeciency Dyson does! Nevertheless, the Prices are to high for all of those vacuums! Regarding the Vorwerk: I think the main concept ist to use the wet floor cleaning attachment, which in this type no other company offers! Also here, Price is to high IMHO.

@VacuumFacts

2 жыл бұрын

What happens is some pioneer has a vision, invests heavily in expensive R&D to make it a reality. Then, when it becomes popular because it works and is better, the worst of capitalism raises its ugly head. They try to siphon off some of the profit by skirting patent protections and copying to avoid all the hard R&D work, producing a copycat kludge that doesn’t work well, and screw the customer over for their own profiteering gain. Those knockoffs are almost as expensive, but just that bit cheaper to try and steal the sale. And when it doesn’t work as well, the original idea that was developed so well ends up sullied. I made a video about the shady practice here kzread.info/dash/bejne/h5OltZSiZqu3grw.html . The mop head you claim Vorwerk champions was actually concept-invented by Dyson ~2014, the better part of a decade ago kzread.info/dash/bejne/p6euxdZvfc3Rprg.html . The Dyson Hard (DC56) used wet pads which vacuumed and mopped the floor at the same time. The rest copied. Dyson later seemingly discontinued the idea, either because it wasn’t popular or didn’t work as well as other methods in the end (like simply mopping properly with a mop and bucket).

Dyson has no mop attachement for tiles, and Kobold does. So i bought the Kobold, as their mop attachment works really well on my tiles. The vaccuum itself is meh and way overpriced, but the mop attachment is unlike any other product that I'm aware of.

@VacuumFacts

Жыл бұрын

What about a mop? Spin mops are great and cheap. kzread.info/dash/bejne/l3-TrqSufMicmbQ.html

@VacuumFacts

Жыл бұрын

Incidentally, I think Dyson are developing a wet-cleaning product which acts as a mop

@Dysonballs

Жыл бұрын

Be interesting to see what Dyson develops with wet cleaning or mopping and vacuuming simultaneously. Products that mop and vacuum simultaneously seem or appear to be growing in popularity!

@VacuumFacts

Жыл бұрын

@JonnyMD94 It's a rotating triangular-headed wet mop machine with cleaning solution that is released from a reservoir when you press down. No vacuum; it's not the Dyson hard V2. They're also working on an AC-like portable cooling device to add to their fan range, and the triodetic, which combines toothbrush and water pick in one. And a bunch of robotics. The next vacuum head has a suction relief valve built in to avoid clamping. There are vacuum attachment tools being developed that separate large particles before the bin (e.g., for catching bugs), and their air-purifier headphones (with India in mind). And of course, they have a very expensive battery gigafactory built in Asia manufacturing their own solid state cells to wrap into clever weight-distributed batteries. Next year some of this might start appearing. kzread.info/dash/bejne/a6CoqNuJh9ydoKQ.html

@Dysonballs

Жыл бұрын

@Vacuum Facts like the sound of that and with that designed triangular head will get into corners with ease! I did wonder if they ever would do an updated Dyson Hard in the future but obviously not! Good idea with the portable A/C like cooling device no doubt with a filter. I thought the trade name triodetic was related to the tooth brush and water pick device they have been working on. Few patents registered for that. I see some other trademarks have been registered like Gen5Detect, Optic and Fluffy Optic which are related to floor cleaning apparatus.I saw in the news about robotics they are working on! Not heard of that, great idea and it will sure be welcomed especially on thicker, longer and denser pile carpets. Which seem to be popular at present! Interesting attachment tools they are working on for separating large particles before the main bin! I see they have launched this year the new Awkward gap tool and the Scratch-free dusting brush that self cleans! The air purifier head phones look cool known as the Zone I believe. I think the release date for this is later this year! Maybe India first with the product in mind for that market then others to follow! Yes the solid state batteries they are now manufacturing so hopefully they will appear in some new products next year along with some of this other new technology they are busy working on! One I’m interested in is seeing these new solid state battery technology Dyson has invented and manufacturing! Thank you for the information and link. I do look out for and read some of the patents Dyson log that you can view online!

I'm disappointed at the lack of people arguing with you in the comments 😂

@VacuumFacts

2 жыл бұрын

haha ikr. Most of the wretched internet kid trolls are blocked because they're a waste of time and offer no entertainment value. I think the rabid vacuum enthusiast morons have finally learned they're wrong and have no argument, so just sit silently and sulk. It's not the same now without the entertainment of the dumbasses though.

@sbomorse

2 жыл бұрын

I don't think anybody will ever best Dyson. The only reason I've not updated my V10 is because I've got a really good robot vacuum that does all the heavy lifting and I can't justify upgrading to the V15. Although I'm going to have to change the battery as I dropped it and the battery is loose and means the trigger doesn't work properly.

@VacuumFacts

2 жыл бұрын

@@sbomorse I'm hoping, and much more confident, that next generation of Dyson cordless (possibly this year?) will have the first market-ready solid-state batteries in it. I've read articles stating those batteries are in production by Dyson. If so, that's the start of a new era in battery technology.

@colbydyer7191

2 жыл бұрын

You literally just contradicted your own statement. The trolls offer no entertainment value, then it's not the same without the entertainment of the trolls? I'm as confused as ever now.

@VacuumFacts

2 жыл бұрын

@@colbydyer7191 I suggest you re-read the comment then because that was a poor substitute.

Still no sign of the new Dyson yet 🤔

@VacuumFacts

2 жыл бұрын

Assuming there is one. Unless you mean the Dyson Optic (and Fluffy Optic)?

@parwaz7861

2 жыл бұрын

@@VacuumFacts I’m waiting for the next cordless vacuum to be a v15 upgrade- I see they announced some air purifying headphones tho!

@VacuumFacts

2 жыл бұрын

@@parwaz7861 yup

@parwaz7861

2 жыл бұрын

@@VacuumFacts do you reckon they’ll launch one anytime soon? Or until next year for the next vacuum model

@VacuumFacts

2 жыл бұрын

@@parwaz7861 No idea

Sounds like the European version of the Kirby in terms of expense and "kit"

@VacuumFacts

2 жыл бұрын

In a way, I suppose. Except this is MUCH better than a Kirby. A kirby is the WORST vacuum cleaner I've ever used. By far. It's literally so bad, as my review of it showed in the playlist kzread.info/head/PLBxUOcW7kaEs7xuTK2A-pncwupMjXuRbb

@Boodieman72

2 жыл бұрын

@@VacuumFacts I did mean in terms of expense and each accessory is expensive too.

@VacuumFacts

2 жыл бұрын

@@Boodieman72 It's daylight robbery

What an embarrassing product. I snorted when you showed the flap switch. They're definitely selling to corporate offices, hoping they'll buy this instead of a Riccar Supralight as a cordless upright because that's the form factor their janitors are used to and office managers don't care about price. Something that really confuses me is the continued use of brushed DC motors with bypass cooling on clones. Dyson doesn't have a monopoly on brushless outrunners and they're incredibly cheap to build and drive. Off-the-shelf FOC ICs even come with active braking! (Dyson's "boing"). It's 2022 and there is literally no reason to be using brushed motors anymore. They have more parts, wear faster, waste power and blow out carcinogenic dust under normal operation. Brushless motors are simple, inexpensive, and have no wear parts at all if correctly specced. Even the fan design (multistage radial fans aren't a Dyson patent or anything) hasn't evolved a bit. Every other manufacturer is still just slapping a disc fan on a shaft because they know low price and novelty wins sales. Vacuums are the latest household appliance to slip into disposability rather than serviceability, and it's just sad.

@VacuumFacts

2 жыл бұрын

What separates Dyson’s motors is their industry-leading power density, and to achieve the values they do requires sophisticated electromagnetic engineering amongst other material, geometric, and fluid dynamic optimisations of their impellor and shaft, that are fully patented so competitors can't steal the technology and design required. Competitor brushless motors are very far behind in power density and why they thus have relatively huge heavy motors that are less efficient (waste more energy), and thus why they are always seen to skimp on battery size, run time, and performance, to keep product weight down, as revealed in every cordless review I’ve done (such as this one).

This looks like an ad for Dyson

@VacuumFacts

Жыл бұрын

You'd have to be pretty stupid to think evidenced facts constituting the FULL truth is an advert. It's very interesting that after seeing a review entirely dedicated to the Vorwek product, which presents all the facts, the whole truth, and not just a cherry-picked misleading subset half-truth, you come away with the conclusion that the product it's compared against, that is considered market leading, is actually better. I mean that says it all and shows the accuracy of the conclusions you *can* draw when you get the *full* information that marketing withhold.

@proggerize

8 ай бұрын

​@@VacuumFacts almost all your videos at least mention "Dyson", which does raise suspicion. It is also very difficult for people to verify your "facts". I'm not saying that this channel is sponsored or owned by Dyson, but it certainly does look so.

@VacuumFacts

8 ай бұрын

@@proggerize This is a common barrel-scrape form of hollow discreditation that shows a staggering lack of ability to think carefully. Dyson is mentioned often because, as far as can be measured, they provide the upper-limit benchmarks of what is possible that it is only fair to compare against with products in the same competitive marketplace. The data used to draw conclusions is provided. It’s not difficult to verify facts if someone really gives a shit-for example, if you want to remain credible after suggesting someone is biased. I do it in my own home fairly accurately, although I am quick to point out that only the industry standard testing remains the tried-and-tested method of objective verification. My most recent video purposefully does not mention Dyson, when it was absolutely relevant and legitimate to, serving to nullify almost childlike suggestions there’s bias. If someone concludes bias from a collection of facts which paints the full picture and reveals weaknesses in other products, then it is bias-by them, to fail to look at data and get past cosmetics. For example, is there a single thing in the video you think didn't made sense, or wasn't supported by clear evidence shown, or do you fully accept the statements made? If the former, then one wonders why it wasn't mentioned; if the latter, then that contradicts the suggestion of bias.

@filiplaskovski9993

7 ай бұрын

Why cares we know Dyson make amazing vacuums !!

@VacuumFacts

7 ай бұрын

@@filiplaskovski9993 Because false claims are often made and this video provided the evidence associated with them, indicating they were misleading.

Get em told

Take aways from the Kobold. That battery location on the is really bad. Above the dirt bin. I could just see the battery contacts getting dust on them over time. The tools look pretty useless too. $283 Pounds for a brush. You can buy a whole vacuum for that. The overpriced bags are tiny. Seems like a waste of cash to me.

@VacuumFacts

2 жыл бұрын

And everything else in the review.

@VacMaster1991

2 жыл бұрын

@@VacuumFacts about right

Ever looked at some reviews of this product on YT and thought, what a bunch of sellout deceivers? Completely vague, no evidence, no details, just subjective claims, and opinions. They get given a free toy to say good things about, essentially half-truthing to the viewers and misleading them. Totally disappointing but not unexpected. >_> So, here’s the FULL truth and the evidence that goes with it. I wonder how long it will be before some idiot waddles over here and oinks something to the effect of “oh you’re clearly biased towards Dyson”. No stupid; Dyson is the top product on the market, so everything is compared against it because that’s what’s possible. You’ve foolishly confused simple facts and evidence for bias. All I’ve shown is what customers are *not* told. The facts speak for themselves without the need for opinions. Sorry if you’re offended because facts conflict with your tribalistic, wonky worldview.

@yangfnngf4104

Жыл бұрын

Hey very good video, will you make videos about air purifiers? Do you have a science/ engineer back round? Thanks in advance for every video

Are you incapable of restraining yourself or do you take pride in being an insufferable know it all?

@VacuumFacts

2 жыл бұрын

What a nasty, hostile comment that's completely unprovoked, and whose only purpose is to put down other people and condemn efforts to find the truth for others. Shame on you. But par for the course, I suppose, from the rabid 'vacuum enthusiast community'.

@davidtomlins9759

2 жыл бұрын

This boy is clearly a narcisist judging from this video & all his replies in this comment section i hope no more of his videos appear in my playlist hes truly insuffurable!

@HCG

2 жыл бұрын

Imagine being this irate over someone making fact based, detailed reviews. Get back to pretending your frivolous channel’s existence matters to anyone.

@VacuumFacts

2 жыл бұрын

@@HCG Essentially the worst actors out there constituting the rabid 'vacuum enthusiast community' were called out by the nature of the content of my channel. Over time, they've lost all their bullshit defenses and even they now appreciate they were wrong. But they still can't admit they accept facts and what's true, and so are left shit-slinging by branding those who were right as 'insufferable know it alls', as though sharing knowledge about what is true is somehow a bad thing. Literally the worst and most repellent minds out there that leave a foul stain on the platform and the species in general. They polluted and misled for years, their betters had to come along and clean up the filth they smeared, leading to all the hate they flush onto my comments. It's so pathetic you almost feel sorry for them.

@HiNickCares

Жыл бұрын

You should take it as a compliment.