Пікірлер

• 
  @stlflyguyКүн бұрын

  Wow! What a find! I can only imagine how smooth that thing runs.

• 
  @user-qe9hw4mt1yКүн бұрын

  Wonderful

• 
  @haplo8192 күн бұрын

  This video is the very best of what KZread has to offer. Thank you.

• 
  @quinnjimКүн бұрын

  Wow. High praise!

• 
  @micksimmonds14753 күн бұрын

  You look like a professional Maddie, congratulations for your great achievements

• 
  @JustSayN2O4 күн бұрын

  I wonder what the engine overhaul costs. $100k?

• 
  @quinnjim4 күн бұрын

  I think the crankshaft is over $30,000.

• 
  @JustSayN2O3 күн бұрын

  @@quinnjim That's an order of magnitude more than the price of a decent automobile crate engine.

• 
  @dpg7074 күн бұрын

  Legend. I replaced and returned at least 5 different parts on my heater air can and paper clip did the trick. Thank you.

• 
  @quinnjim4 күн бұрын

  Awesome! Sometimes it’s the simplest thing.

• 
  @henryalford5936 күн бұрын

  Thanks so much for the clear and complete instructions. I was seconds away from calling for help when your video solved my problem.

• 
  @Gaibel27 күн бұрын

  The Time going fast... :-)

• 
  @mikecoffee1007 күн бұрын

  Cirrus flying I pad ?? wellllll if you realy like it ok but keep it for awhile then

• 
  @easttexan29337 күн бұрын

  Did you stumble upon your next buy? lol What a fantastic airplane. Are those TC? Do they need to be TC? lol. I mean at 12,500 probably still making 250hp+ right. Be interesting to know the real numbers on that. Thanks for sharing. A real beaut.

• 
  @quinnjim7 күн бұрын

  I don’t think the guy would sell it. It is not turbo charged. He says 195 knots true pretty consistently.

• 
  @jhaedtler8 күн бұрын

  A friend has one, I always tease him that it has the same fuel burn of a Staggerwing! Without the class! Also they are not as fast as the twin commanche

• 
  @quinnjim7 күн бұрын

  The Twin Comanche is about 30 knots slower. The turbo charged TWINCO is definitely faster. I have a lot of time riding around in a stagger wing. What a dream airplane!

• 
  @jhaedtler7 күн бұрын

  @@quinnjim You need to fly the Miller twin. It is a rocket. I have spent the last 30 years doing the annuals on a friend Staggerwing. It is the most impressive plane I have ever worked on. And one of the easiest planes to fly.

• 
  @N988588 күн бұрын

  Very Nice... ';-)

• 
  @Austin-jp9pi8 күн бұрын

  Wow, nice

• 
  @sebastianip47518 күн бұрын

  Are you buying it then over the cirrus?

• 
  @quinnjim7 күн бұрын

  Nope. We still want a Cirrus. We might upgrade to a G6 over the one in the last video though. I may have already replaced the RV-6A with something fun. Stay tuned!!

• 
  @Mr.Martini5498 күн бұрын

  So clean. Very nice looking plane.

• 
  @irishcurse658 күн бұрын

  Beautiful plane.

• 
  @mikecoffee1008 күн бұрын

  ok go buy it and we look forward to you flying this lol and Hope You and Your Family are doing well in the skies

• 
  @quinnjim7 күн бұрын

  I’m still looking at the Cirrus. I may have already bought a fun airplane to replace the RV-6A. Stay tuned!

• 
  @mikecoffee1007 күн бұрын

  @@quinnjim flying I pad realy well it is cool looking though

• 
  @flyguy59418 күн бұрын

  I just looked up the N number. This plane is no longer flying according to faa.gov. I wonder what happened?

• 
  @quinnjim8 күн бұрын

  It has flown 3 times this month according to FlightAware.

• 
  @flyguy59417 күн бұрын

  @@quinnjim i transposed a number. I checked again and you are correct!

• 
  @quinnjim7 күн бұрын

  @@flyguy5941 That explains it!😀

• 
  @AlexisRodriguez-ww7lt11 күн бұрын

  KZread 2006 Harley Davidson fat boy

• 
  @davidromanello13 күн бұрын

  Saved me a service call 🙌🏼. Thanks Brother!!

• 
  @quinnjim12 күн бұрын

  Great to hear!

• 
  @Waynefinnin15 күн бұрын

  Just ordered the super slug was wondering what slugs are you using currently partion gold no longer in production was thinking remington accutip but any information would be greatly appreciated

• 
  @quinnjim14 күн бұрын

  I bought a bunch of the partition gold when I got the gun. I still have some, so I haven't tried anything different yet!

• 
  @Waynefinnin17 күн бұрын

  Excellent video if possible can we swe more videos on remington super slug

• 
  @quinnjim17 күн бұрын

  I have taken a LOT of deer with it. It's a real sniper rifle (for a slug gun). KZread has taken down some of my gun videos. They really hate them. Thanks for watching!

• 
  @brybeecher19 күн бұрын

  My fuse kept blowing when I turned on AC. Called HVAC repair and they diagnosed and replaced the contactor on the AC unit to fix it (old one's resistance/Ohm reading was off). Wish I would have known before paying for the technician! How to check the contactor: kzread.info/dash/bejne/i3etyaqamta9Y5c.htmlfeature=shared

• 
  @DiMoraDiamond21 күн бұрын

  I’ve got a funky wind issue as well with dual GI-275’s. My course was 181. My heading was 187 (6 degree right crab)… with winds aloft of 296@13… but my 275 shows a 6 knot tailwind (about right) but a 12 knot crosswind left to right. Huh? Crosswind should be right to left! It’s backwards!

• 
  @quinnjim20 күн бұрын

  I don't know why Garmin can't get the math right.

• 
  @patrickcoleman608822 күн бұрын

  Turn the 177 into the Cirrus, keep the RV

• 
  @quinnjim21 күн бұрын

  Sure. Can I borrow $70,000?😀

• 
  @patrickcoleman608821 күн бұрын

  Well, you asked the question and it’s evident you really like the RV and really like the Cirrus. Is there an attachment to the Cardinal? And let’s be honest…you’ve been spending a lot of money on hangers, 150’s, engines, and avionics…so it didn’t seem like the Cirrus was out of reach…

• 
  @keramiz307222 күн бұрын

  Could this happen on a heater that has been working for 3 weeks? Can it still clog?

• 
  @quinnjim22 күн бұрын

  I think a spider can clog it up in a couple days.

• 
  @jamesneumann545022 күн бұрын

  Go with the Siris and ENJOY

• 
  @brandenraftery507424 күн бұрын

  Why not sell the 177 and have the RV & Cirrus? Then you'd have a nice family cruiser and a plane you could do gentleman's aerobatics and or more efficient solo cruising.

• 
  @quinnjim23 күн бұрын

  That would be great, but I do have a budget to consider. The plan is to buy a basic RV-4 for half the price of my Rv-6 for fun. I need more tailwheel time anyway.😀

• 
  @markg445924 күн бұрын

  You talk like you want the Cirrus (back). A partnership is an economical way to go, provided you have the right partner. You'll not regret the time with your daughter & possibly easier to move on from the partnership when you're ready...in two more years. I think your RV will fetch a good price given the quality & upgrades. Good luck! : )

• 
  @quinnjim23 күн бұрын

  The RV actually sold very quickly. I still want an RV in the fleet...probably a 4

• 
  @eddiecortez813624 күн бұрын

  Dude!!!! You rock! Thank you sir! I owe you a steak!

• 
  @quinnjim23 күн бұрын

  GREAT to hear! So frustrating when they don't fire up in the Spring.

• 
  @larrytompkins440824 күн бұрын

  Get a Cessna TTX

• 
  @quinnjim23 күн бұрын

  Those are awesome. The Cirrus I have an opportunity to buy is a known quantity (no hidden issues with it). That is my best option right now.

• 
  @rfriesen164424 күн бұрын

  Cirrus....

• 
  @Foster_Asanty00724 күн бұрын

  Very simple 😊😊

• 
  @N9885825 күн бұрын

  Hey Him, Personally I'm NOT A Big Experimental Guy... The Cirrus is a "Much Better and Viable for ME Sir" and I believe that you too know that based on this video message! Thanks for asking for my 2 cents ';-)

• 
  @quinnjim23 күн бұрын

  It's tough to find a well built experimental. I'm definitely looking forward to owning something made in this century as well! Good to hear from you.

• 
  @CompleteWalkaround25 күн бұрын

  Maybe trade the 177 for the Cirrus and keep the 6? Or trade the 6 for the Cirrus and get an RV3!

• 
  @quinnjim23 күн бұрын

  RV-3 or RV-4 for sure.

• 
  @paulki8fr25 күн бұрын

  Me personally I don't play well with others. The partnership would never work out for me. But partnerships has its positive and its negatives. The negatives was my issues.

• 
  @quinnjim23 күн бұрын

  I have had some bad partnerships. I am now VERY careful with whom I partner. I've got some good guys lined up!

• 
  @thesearcherman665225 күн бұрын

  Well, N11111 is for sale too. Just saying. A partnership also means you will be staying in Chi town for many more years???? If you subtracted the cost of ownership from that $100,000 the last Cirrus is worth today, what is the net gain? Did the last Cirrus need the 10 year parachute replaced? This one will need a new chute in 2 years. And, according to one YT channel, they are hard to come by these days. I forget the labor charge, wasn’t cheap. I think you need a PT 6 out front myself. Best Wishes!

• 
  @quinnjim23 күн бұрын

  The Cirrus parachute is actually due every 10 years, so this one needs one in 2. The parts supply problem has been largely fixed. My shop said 5-8 weeks lead time is all they need. You are selling the Aerostar? That is another great option!

• 
  @thesearcherman665223 күн бұрын

  @@quinnjim-Not my Aerostar, it’s well know Aerostar YT provider Eric Reese, my mistake on the Cirrus parachute years. You might like YT provider JR Aviation’s post awhile back on his Cirrus SR 20 chute. KZread will not let me post the links. Thanks for the reply and best wishes to you and your family!

• 
  @quinnjim22 күн бұрын

  @@thesearcherman6652 I watched that video. I have a buddy who waited a year for his chute too. We called our service center and they said they have gotten caught up with the parts problem Cirrus was having. We are still going to order ours 6-8 months early!

• 
  @thesearcherman665222 күн бұрын

  @@quinnjim- I shouldn’t have said anything, You got it all figured out. But, maybe checkout the 2025 Corvette C8 ZR1 if you get bored. 👍

• 
  @4420dano25 күн бұрын

  How bout instead of a (I'll guess) a partnership in a $400k cirrus, you get a nicely maintained Saratoga for yourself. You can pick those up all day for 200k or a bit less - and you'd have a great 145-160kt / 16 g/hr. xcty plane -- w/o a partner. Sure, it flies like a truck, but when you want to have fun, you'd still have the RV. I know all this stuff because I AM LIKE YOU AND ALWAYS LOOKING AT ANOTHER AIRPLANE! -- it's like a disease and you're right, it's always about 2 years and it doesn't matter how damn good my current plane already is ------ you're always looking at the next one! when you find a cure for THAT -- lemme know..........

• 
  @quinnjim23 күн бұрын

  The Saratoga is on the radar for sure. I rarely need a plane of that size though. I looked hard at the A36 as well.

• 
  @aaronboulais449825 күн бұрын

  Do the Cirrus 👍🏻

• 
  @sebastianip475125 күн бұрын

  Flying boat

• 
  @jacknevitt738425 күн бұрын

  The Cirrus seems more practical. The parachute adds a layer of options when you need them most plus it’s just a durn good airplane!

• 
  @quinnjim23 күн бұрын

  Yeah, I'm a fan of the Cirrus. I think it's a good way to go.

• 
  @lutherwasoniii662726 күн бұрын

  I agree with the RV10! best of both worlds.

• 
  @kirbyclone329326 күн бұрын

  Please put your panel in my RV-7 before you go…..😂

• 
  @quinnjim23 күн бұрын

  Going to a G1000 from 8 years ago is definitely a step BACKWARDS. I love the G3X touch.

• 
  @rayburn200726 күн бұрын

  A Kodiak 100 😅

• 
  @quinnjim26 күн бұрын

  Solid choice.

• 
  @crufflerdoug26 күн бұрын

  Nice 6A! I own a slider 9A. Also had to look at a LOT of used RVs before I found mine. it's hard to find a good one. Keep the RV. :)

• 
  @coorsleftfield26 күн бұрын

  If an Rv4 with a tailwheel is "manning up" , going to a Cirrus, especially a 20, is going in the other direction from manning up. Get a tailwheel RV , and rent a 4 seater for the rare times it's needed.

• 
  @quinnjim26 күн бұрын

  I do too much flying to not have a 4 seater. The Cirrus is a great machine, but the folks who fly them definitely have a reputation! Tailwheel RV is definitely in the plan someday.

• 
  @coorsleftfield25 күн бұрын

  @@quinnjim I have a RV7 tailwheel and a Cessna 170. Love flying them both. Don't you have a 177 for a 4 seater?

• 
  @quinnjim23 күн бұрын

  @@coorsleftfield I do, but I'd like to have a modern 4 seater, then a RV-4 for the "toy" airplane. The 177 is wonderful, but 50 year old planes need a lot of work. The Cirrus is practically brand new.

• 
  @skycop5626 күн бұрын

  I own an RV6A. I love it. But most of my flying is done VFR and solo. Don’t fly at night. If money was no issue I’d buy the SR22. In a partnership you will cut costs by 50% and still get all the benefits. The RV should fetch $125k+ in todays market. Go for it.

• 
  @quinnjim26 күн бұрын

  You know the market! I think the Cirrus and a RV-4 would be perfect.

• 
  @Ralphymay526 күн бұрын

  Have you considered Lancair 4s? For the same money you could get a pressurized turbine one.

• 
  @quinnjim26 күн бұрын

  I think the insurance and fuel bill would be a little out of my budget. Great plan, though.

• 
  @stevenflattum15626 күн бұрын

  RV 10 is what you need.

• 
  @nossonyoffe380526 күн бұрын

  I was thinking the same thing

• 
  @quinnjim26 күн бұрын

  I would prefer a 10 over the Cirrus, but I don’t have partners who agree with that plan. I may need you again for my RV-4 checkout!

• 
  @RaceMentally26 күн бұрын

  You’ll regret selling it. They ALL DO!!! Plus look at all the hangar room with the RV in there. You’ve got the plane that does it all. Only gripe is throwing stuff in baggage compartment. That’s it.

• 
  @quinnjim26 күн бұрын

  I will definitely buy another one. I’d just keep it VFR though. Love the RV lineup.

• 
  @RaceMentally26 күн бұрын

  @@quinnjim what area are you in?

• 
  @quinnjim23 күн бұрын

  @@RaceMentally "What ARE ARE you in?" Did you mean what state? Illinois.

• 
  @RaceMentally22 күн бұрын

  @@quinnjim area*