On this channel, I create historical cinematics based on the epic conflicts of history, ranging from The Antiquity to the Early Modern Period comprising of the Greco- Persian War, The Peloponnesian War, The Conquests of Alexander, The Punic Wars, The Viking Invasions of the British Isles, The Holy Crusades up to the Napoleonic Era.
I intend to cover Indian history, from the Vedic Era to the Dark Age of Colonization! With immediate plans for The Ahoms of Assam, The Maurya Empire and The Marathas, I would also like to cover
The Chola dynasty, Rashtrakuta dynasty, Pallava dynasty, Chalukya dynasty, Mughal Empire, Satavahana dynasty, Gupta dynasty, Pandyan dynasty, Khilji dynasty, Vijayanagara Empire, Lodi dynasty, Tughlaq dynasty, Sayyid dynasty, Chera dynasty, Nanda dynasty, Kadamba dynasty, Shunga Empire, Mamluk Dynasty, Kakatiya dynasty, Shishunaga dynasty, Kanva dynasty, Bimbisara and Pushyabhuti dynasty
Join me on this epic journey as we explore these grand periods of history
Пікірлер
Magnificent
Glad u liked it !
No wall. No moat. Not even a presentable fence.
Give it time and this game shall surpass our expectations!! We have seen much worse early releases, haven’t we?
@@lionsbergcinematic3215 It is a quote from the 13th Warrior.
@@euphoria7046 Oh dear! I did not know that, thank you!
In your rendering settings you have switched on 'interlace' somewhere. That's causing the stripes to appear all over the screen. This is an old compression technique used in the early 00's and is no longer relevant. I would highly recommend you reupload this using a webm format.
Thank you so much for this valuable tip.. I will make sure to implement it!
Such a brilliant video. Man this channel is under-rated. This needs much more recognition. Truly fantastic 👏🏻👏🏻
That is very generous of you to say Dexter!! Congratulations on reaching 2K subs milestone!! You are my inspiration!! 😊
Very nice! And thank you for fitting out the retinue properly :D
I am so glad you liked it !
❤️❤️❤️
10:00 Weeeee
less go🔥
This video provided an incredibly detailed account of the Battle of Zama, surpassing any others I've seen. It offered a deeper understanding of the battle's intricacies, from strategic maneuvers to key figures involved. Overall, it was an enlightening experience that enhanced my appreciation for ancient warfare
A comment like this makes my hard work worth it! Glad that you liked it!
Zama was the duel between the best generals of their era. With the exception of Alexander.
Thermapilly!
Excellent presentation. I have been studying ancient and medieval military history since 1956 when I got a copy of Ceasar's Conquests by Classics Illistrated. I am now subscribed to your fine channel and looking forward to more study. Thank you friends!!
Thank You so much!
It’s interesting how apathetic rome was to Carthage. Many years later after Hannibal’s defeat. The politicians in rome decided to invade Carthage even though it was wrecked economically from Hannibal’s blunder and was struggling. Rome invaded and killed / enslaved everyone there and destroyed the capital and thus ended Carthage.
Pure revenge and politics!
I still don’t understand how Hannibal and the Carthaginians won numerous battles in a row yet only lost the battle of zama n lost the war?
Certain factors come into play: 1. Loss of more experienced Carthaginian troops 2. Loss of allies 3. Inability of Hannibal to effectively use his military victories for political gains! 4. Internal political instability 5. Gradual decline of Carthaginian economy and military spending 6. Loss of good and trusted commanders in Hannibal’s Army 7. Romans have learnt from their mistakes and became more experienced than ever! With a thirst for revenge the Romans under Scipio gave all in! Ps. I call the Battle of Zama, the Waterloo of that era! Was Wellington much better than Napoleon- debatable, likewise Scipio had the favour of the Gods and it could have very easily been the other way round!
I mean great graphics and visuals but the music man that's all I could hear
Yes Sir, that was a mistake on my part, I made some changes just before rendering it one final time and it somehow ruined the narration with the loud music! I have however been more careful to not let this happen on my next video henceforth! So sorry for the inconvenience!
The music drowns out the narrative!! Thumbs down;!
I really appreciate your honesty! Ps. I have solved the problem and the audio should not be a hinder on the new videos!
The amount of detail and effort that went into this is astonishing. Bravo!
Scipio was participating many battle against Hannibal with his father , now he knew all tactics what Hannibal always used to . I only Scipio this genius roman general , because Carthage was the block that Rome must exterminated .
I thought scipio spaced out his ranks so the elephants would walked right through and get attacked on both sides
Scipio knew how the animal instinct worked! The elephants would never charge on the Roman Walls if gaps are present and the velites luring them by running infront of the beasts can be compared to running in front of an angry dog charging at you, both the elephant and the dog will focus on the running object than anything stationary! We can however expect that some of the Romans in the lines may have shot a few of their javelins but it’s a question of army discipline! If Scipio had the lines ordered not to engage with the elephants they probably would not have engaged with them, considering the time they spent under Scipio’s lead! And multiple sources suggests that the Velites took the blunt of the Elephant charge and finally tacked the beading however incurring huge losses themselves ! Considering the social segregation of the time, Scipio would be more protective of the elite Romans! If the elephants can be lured away from the main lines then why waste the more elite Roman infantry, the Principes and Triarii ranks fighting the elephants?
If the Romans didn't win I don't think Carthage would have fallen in the Third Punic War and history as we know it would have been much different. Both sides were fighting for their survival and the future of the world and history itself.
True… Carthaginians would have more supporters to fight the Romans off!
I don't think Carthage would had prevailed even if it ended Winning at Zama. In general in the 2nd Punic war if Hannibal was not there the Romans used to prevail. Simply Hannibal genius could not be everywhere. And Romans would probably simply avoid Hannibal and hit any other Carthaginian army led by any lesser officer.
I wish it was narrated, still being subtitled helps with the hearing impaired!
I plan on making a better narrated version of this Battle soon !!
Wowww!! ❤️
The one berserker on the nrodge was sick
Very Very interested
Elephants in gaugamela?
Please check more than one history books
A work of art. Truly beautiful!
I am honoured!! Thank you so much!!
Nice fictional recreation of the battle. Keep up the good work. 👍
Thank you Amlan, this was a product of the various experimentations performed to recreate actual waterloo documentary, the one that is currently being made and the trailer is recently uploaded 😄
@@lionsbergcinematic3215 oh I see. I saw the trailer. Waiting for the documentary. 😄
@@amlanshekharbaruah thank u so much bruh!!!
the music is terrible
Mind to explain ?
Just so greattt! ❤ I'm a fan. ✨
Not regretting watching it twice. ✨
Means a lot dear ❤️
If the trailer looks like this I wonder how the actual documentary would be like. Can't wait!!! ❤️✨😊
Whats this mod called please?
The close shots are done using DEI (Divided et Impera) and the drone shots are probably just vanilla with colossal unit size mod on
@@lionsbergcinematic3215 wow thats awesome. But I didn't know that DEI had soldiers with corinthian helmets?
Well if u r talking about the Spartans in the shot then I must say and u might not like to know that I specifically and painstaking moded those units and added it to dei just for the video purpose, but I did not have the authority to upload that submod into the steam workshop
And I was helped in the moding ofcourse
@@lionsbergcinematic3215 wow wish I had that mod. Thank you for the replies. Cheers.
Clickbait
how?
Now i have to watch waterloo again, thanks^^
Glad 😃 Have fun!
epic shots and cinematis well done!
Thank you so much Bro
This my friend, is a work of art
Thank you so much 😊
I like it but what would Ney say?
is the sound from the Napoleon trailer? can't wait for the movie😂😂😂
Me neither!!! That’s why I used it here ✨
Nice videography, good job!
Thank you so much, I am honoured!!
The actual battle, right? 😅
yes
Trailer of the documentary actually 😅
Man.... absolutely fantastic... its beey hard to describe such an eventful battle in 6 mins... my friend you have done a commendable job 👏🏻👏🏻 keep it up
just the trailer, the main show is to come :)
Wow, thank you!! 😅
Absolutely beautiful!! Amazing shots and editing!!
Thank you so much Joe, I am really honoured!!! Can't wait to work not a project of yours 😀
One of best ❤❤❤❤
Thank you so much 🙏
Epic 🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥
Thanks bro
The Germanic tribes have phalanx formation?
Actually many historians such as Steuer agrees to this concept as opposed by Tacitus. In antiquity, Germanic warriors fought mostly on foot. Germanic infantry fought in tight formations in close combat, in a style that Steuer compares to the Greek phalanx. Tacitus mentions a single formation as used by the Germani, the wedge (Latin: cuneus). Men probably practiced the use of weapons beginning in their youth. When fighting the Roman legions, Germanic warriors seem to have preferred to attack from ambush, which would require organization and training.
❤mnbgfdsaqer
❤mnhngfdswqer
Im ashamed to admit that it took me a hot minute to realise they were narrating their battle of Waterloo and not the actual battle of Waterloo. Sitting here thinking "I've never heard of the Prussian General Noisy.."
Especially when the title read 'A Historical FICTION' 😂😂😂😂 Mr Noisy is the name of the player controlling the Prussians, I thought it would be funny to refer him as General! Also I did the same with the other players. PS. An accurate historical documentary on waterloo is being made by our team and we hope to release it soon, this video was actually a test run that went a little rogue 😂
@@lionsbergcinematic3215 Looking forward to it.
❤❤❤
That is a situation what Napoleon know what will happened if Wellington and Blucher forces would united on Waterloo field. That means 200 000 Coalition soldiers against 130 000 Napoleon forces. It means sure Napoleon defeat. So, that is a reason why Napoleon beat Prussian forces near Ligny, at 17th of June, 1815. He tried separated Prussians from Wellington forces, beat decisively Prussians and than deal with Wellington forces near village of Waterloo. Unfortunately, Ney made two mistakes near Quatre Brass: he did not taken cross road before Wellington forces and he did not support on time Napoleon forces near village of Ligny. So, battle was not decisive and Blucher was not defeated. Napoleon than was going against Wellington forces on next day, but Blucher forces would come on the battlefield just on time and Napoleon was in trouble. Why were Prussians come on time? Because, Grouchy was doing another fatal mistake and Prussians bypassed French forces and attacked Napoleon right wing when he was winning Wellington forces. He was understood what will be, so he tried change a situation with attacking British forces with Imperial Guard. But, it was too late for victory. PS: My suggestion for author of this story is why he do not make a alternative option when Grouchy and his forces come on the battlefield on time and then they protected Napoleon right flank from the Prussians. Because, Napoleon wanted that when he saw how Prussians come before Grouchy forces. I hope we would see even that kind of version. Because, if Ney did not made own mistakes and Napoleon victory against Prussians at Ligny was decisive, it will be no battle of Waterloo. Wellington will leave Waterloo field before Napoleon come. He knew that, because without Prussian forces he can not win Emperor and his forces. PS: That is my opinion of that battle and how possibly Napoleon could win that battle, on 18th of June, 1815.
I really appreciate your idea... It's really nice to think of that... May be someday I will make a detailed version of Alternate waterloo as well
@@lionsbergcinematic3215 Thank you for your answer and I appreciate that. If you ask me, you do that in the future, because is not much quality videos, about that idea on KZread. With good quality of alternative history version, of course. Your cinematic fun - Dalibor!
@@lionsbergcinematic3215 I can deal with you one more idea for alternative history and battle of Waterloo. In that battle, Napoleon got two weak flank leaders - Ney and Grouchy. If you ever do that idea how Napoleon could win that battle, try to put Marshal Murat on Ney position, on the left flank. Why? Because, when Murat turned back in Paris, in spring 1815, he tried contact Napoleon and ask for forgiving of betrayed of Emperor, after the battle of Leipzig, in 1815. But, Napoleon decided rejected that Murat offer and put more incompetent Ney for that task. So, Ney in Northern Campain, in Belgium, was made two big blunders for French army: first when he did not taken Quattre Brass before Wellington forces and second, when he was not support Emperor forces in battle of Ligny, in crucial time. That battle could be decisive for Napoleon and maybe Northern Campaign would be over before battle of Waterloo. PS: I want to say that maybe Ney was the weakest Marshal and responsible why Napoleon destiny become so tragic in the year of 1815.
The battle of Leipzig was in 1813. Sorry! My mistake!