Пікірлер

• 
  @10vid54 ай бұрын

  Not bad, considering that f/1.4 is the worst aperture on this lens, for which this lens is hated. This lens is more known for microcontrast, color and 3D-pop. All this begin from f/2 up.

• 
  @thanhcao53488 ай бұрын

  this lens can use with fuji body?

• 
  @algeria16226 ай бұрын

  Depends, Fujifilm S5 pro definitely because they have an F mount or ZE for canon I don't know about modern fuji though

• 
  @onezhu203010 ай бұрын

  What model is this adapter ring?TKS

• 
  @stefanpop6091 Жыл бұрын

  Great gear awful photographer

• 
  @triptychz Жыл бұрын

  chill out bro hes not even that bad

• 
  @vpr5562 Жыл бұрын

  I am wondering if i should get it for 270$ brand new, hm. For casual use with 5Dc & a7R3.

• 
  @JanTichyPhotography Жыл бұрын

  thats a good price and it would work very well on the Sony.

• 
  @dremotionpictures3811 Жыл бұрын

  Simply Amazing 👏🏾👏🏾

• 
  @twenty4seven368 Жыл бұрын

  Sorry but horrible music. Good photos.

• 
  @OzSlowly2 жыл бұрын

  Lovely images! I particularly liked your use of a black border, rather than the white border, most commonly used. I find that the white border makes the image too hard to analyse. Thank you.

• 
  @user-yw9fz4dy6z2 жыл бұрын

  Sorry to say so. The BGM is just noise.

• 
  @MangumCo2 жыл бұрын

  in most shots the bokeh looks pretty busy :( the rest of my classics zeiss lenses do not render that way....

• 
  @praguelenshunter5562 жыл бұрын

  yes the 50/1,4 is quite a different lens from the rest, that makes him special :D The Makro-Planar 50/2 is a good substitute, when looking for smoother bokeh.

• 
  @MangumCo2 жыл бұрын

  @@praguelenshunter556 thank you!! I will take a look at the 50/2 version!

• 
  @oliverlison2 жыл бұрын

  @@MangumCo I am using the 50/2 Milvus. It is a fine lens and the bokeh is beautiful. It is also sharp from f2 whereas the 50/1.4 classis is almost usable. Unfortunately, I have sold my copy. Now, I want it back.

• 
  @waltherziemerink Жыл бұрын

  it's different because it's a Cosina and not true Zeiss.

• 
  @EUGEN_VIDEO2 жыл бұрын

  What's with the autofocus bro? How does it work???

• 
  @praguelenshunter5562 жыл бұрын

  there is none...

• 
  @mouselot2 жыл бұрын

  Zeiss Planar on Sony....This Combo Rock's!!

• 
  @Bowyerma2 жыл бұрын

  that bokeh is so good

• 
  @ardchattanchurch47592 жыл бұрын

  This has been the most helpful review, so far- to pesuade me to buy the lens. I already shoot with the Milvus and the old Pancolars; but the Planar seems to be unique, in it's own, special way. Your photo, @4.56; finally convinced me, that I need this lens, too!

• 
  @ElReySupr3me2 жыл бұрын

  Itsan amazing lens. These old zeiss lenses are so amazing. It really makes me wonder how fortunate some photographers were to own these in the old days.

• 
  @praguelenshunter5562 жыл бұрын

  thank you, good to hear that....this Planar is very special to me, but the other Planars are amazing as well...maybe some samples another day.

• 
  @andreathode37822 жыл бұрын

  That shot @1:33 is unbelievable! What a characterful lens this is.

• 
  @praguelenshunter5562 жыл бұрын

  thank you

• 
  @Caracalaba2 жыл бұрын

  I like how the closeup shot of the lense look, specially the glass smooth reflection. What kind of light setup did you use?

• 
  @OzSlowly2 жыл бұрын

  Wonderful images! Thank you for sharing them.🙃

• 
  @etluxaeterna3 жыл бұрын

  that bokeh looks really harsh to me. This lens not good compared to the old true contax planars, these modern ones are manufactured for zeiss by a cheaper company

• 
  @iisanvar2 жыл бұрын

  Yes, majority of modern mass Zeiss lenses are manufactured and even developed in Japan - except for special purposes lenses, like cinema or Otus line for example, still made and developed in Germany

• 
  @oliverlison2 жыл бұрын

  @@iisanvar All Zeiss lenses are and were developed at Zeiss in Germany and later elsewhere too. There is or 15mm ZM (for Leica Mount) which was made in Germany until recently. This one was the last photographic lens that has been produced in Germany. Hasselblad lenses and Contax Zeiss lenses were made in Germany and Japan. Since the digital area of Hasselblad their lenses were made by Fuji for the H series. The X1D series has new lenses which are made by Nittoh Japan. Kyocera stopped the collaboration with Contax and therefore Zeiss was looking for a new partner in Japan. The new partner has become the reowned company of Cosina. Cosina has build a lot of expertise of being an OEM manufactuer for many companies, including Nikon. It made for Zeiss more sense to get lenses produced through someone else in Japan region during the early 2000's. The camera market in Japan was a lot stronger back then. Today all photographic Zeiss lenses are made by Cosina, including the OTUS. Cinema lenses are built in Oberkochen Germany. They are built in Germany because they demand a different technology and need more precision ... so Zeiss said once.

• 
  @juanborrini23453 жыл бұрын

  gracias por ek informe, pero como compararias esta version con el planar para Zeiss FE?

• 
  @praguelenshunter5562 жыл бұрын

  es bastante diferente, es que el FE Planar no es Planar de verdad. Pero me encanta usar el FE tambien. El color que reproduce esta bastante cerca de las series ZE/ZF/ZA/ZM

• 
  @borispradel10372 жыл бұрын

  Es el mismo lente, solamente distinta montura. El ZF (Nikon FX) tiene la ventaja de tener anillo de diafragma y es más fácil usarlo en cámaras mirrorless. El ZE es la versión con un chip de enfoque Canon. Tengo ambos, el ZF en una D700 y el ZE en una 6D. No hay ninguna diferencia óptica. Es uno de mis lentes favoritos.

• 
  @ThePhotoGear3 жыл бұрын

  Excellent work! 👍

• 
  @brentbuckley40733 жыл бұрын

  Thanks for sharing and putting this together!

• 
  @praguelenshunter5563 жыл бұрын

  thank you

• 
  @brentbuckley40733 жыл бұрын

  Thanks for sharing this