Hello, thank you for this, but where can one find module 3? Thanks!
@Sniiigel5 жыл бұрын
Why not just teach the client how to let negative thoughts disappear in the natural flow of thoughts? It seems much faster.
@MrMattias87 Жыл бұрын
That's mindfulness not cbt.
@Captain_Camo Жыл бұрын
Because if you don’t reframe them, negative thoughts tend to come back when triggered. By evaluating the validity of the negative thought and restructuring or reframing it, one stops accepting it as fact and it loses power to negatively affect them.
@ryanwilliams27644 ай бұрын
They do this in another part of the protocol.. the mindful emotional awareness exercise.
@Sniiigel4 ай бұрын
@@Captain_Camo I don't think you need to restructure or reframe a thought to know that it's a thought (as opposed to a fact). It just seems like an extra step to restructure it.
@Sniiigel4 ай бұрын
@@ryanwilliams2764 Good to know, thanks!
@Sniiigel5 жыл бұрын
Glad to see a therapy incorporating a motivational module. Especially since we know it improves the effect of the therapy (Marker & Norton, 2018). Seeing how it improves the effect size, wouldn't that mean that UP has a smaller effect without it? And when it has been found that UP has comparable effects to CBT isnät it an unfair comparison because UP has a motivational aspect by default while CBT does not? Doing the math here (CBT + no motivational module = UP + (including) motivational module ---> CBT + no motivational module > UP + no motivational module) would suggest that the active components of CBT has a better effect than the active components in UP. Or is this reasoning wrong? Marker, I., & Norton, P. J. (2018). The efficacy of incorporating motivational interviewing to cognitive behavior therapy for anxiety disorders: A review and meta-analysis. Clinical Psychology Review, 62, 1-10.
@SCP_Foundation_Spokesperson4 жыл бұрын
You could look, fore exampe, at Aaron Fisher's work on algorithm-based treatment planning. He used the UP modules to create therapies tailored to individual needs. Some of the patients didn't receive module 1.
@DrDFRoss2 ай бұрын
some thoughts: 1)Your logic seems impeccable in principle. Considering the results of previous dismantling studies, logic aside, there really is no substitute for a RCT for answering your question, I'm thinking. 2) The other consideration - for which client population? it would depend in part on the mean readiness for change of your particular clinical population in question. If they are already in action phase, MI isn't indicated and should not be used.
Пікірлер
I hope this is just a bad role-play....
Beautiful Legs ❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️
thank you
what about a non judgmental reframing of thought?
Hello, thank you for this, but where can one find module 3? Thanks!
Why not just teach the client how to let negative thoughts disappear in the natural flow of thoughts? It seems much faster.
That's mindfulness not cbt.
Because if you don’t reframe them, negative thoughts tend to come back when triggered. By evaluating the validity of the negative thought and restructuring or reframing it, one stops accepting it as fact and it loses power to negatively affect them.
They do this in another part of the protocol.. the mindful emotional awareness exercise.
@@Captain_Camo I don't think you need to restructure or reframe a thought to know that it's a thought (as opposed to a fact). It just seems like an extra step to restructure it.
@@ryanwilliams2764 Good to know, thanks!
Glad to see a therapy incorporating a motivational module. Especially since we know it improves the effect of the therapy (Marker & Norton, 2018). Seeing how it improves the effect size, wouldn't that mean that UP has a smaller effect without it? And when it has been found that UP has comparable effects to CBT isnät it an unfair comparison because UP has a motivational aspect by default while CBT does not? Doing the math here (CBT + no motivational module = UP + (including) motivational module ---> CBT + no motivational module > UP + no motivational module) would suggest that the active components of CBT has a better effect than the active components in UP. Or is this reasoning wrong? Marker, I., & Norton, P. J. (2018). The efficacy of incorporating motivational interviewing to cognitive behavior therapy for anxiety disorders: A review and meta-analysis. Clinical Psychology Review, 62, 1-10.
You could look, fore exampe, at Aaron Fisher's work on algorithm-based treatment planning. He used the UP modules to create therapies tailored to individual needs. Some of the patients didn't receive module 1.
some thoughts: 1)Your logic seems impeccable in principle. Considering the results of previous dismantling studies, logic aside, there really is no substitute for a RCT for answering your question, I'm thinking. 2) The other consideration - for which client population? it would depend in part on the mean readiness for change of your particular clinical population in question. If they are already in action phase, MI isn't indicated and should not be used.
good job