中國的外國直接投資究竟減幾多?德國對外投資各國比例?幾個面向分析給你聽〈蕭若元:理論蕭析〉2024-02-20

香港元宇宙youtube 頻道: / @hongkongmetas
💥你爆料我來講Email,歡迎來信爆料:connectionhknews@gmail.com
🐱蕭貓貓辦館最新團購上線!歡迎來逛逛:shiumeowmeow.co
關注🇭🇰《香港新聞連線》追蹤最需要知道的消息
網址:news.hongkongmetas.com/
➡️【如何將香港新聞連線加入首頁?】影片連結: • 隨時都能看香港新聞連線!教你如何將網站加入首...
關注:Twitter: @hkStephenSYY / IG: hkStephenSYY
加入我們的patreon: / mrshiu

Пікірлер: 55

  • @k.h.happyday
    @k.h.happyday5 ай бұрын

    好明顯其他國家投資者都在離棄中國。

  • @clotholachesisatropos
    @clotholachesisatropos5 ай бұрын

    下下都涉及角架安全啲外商外貿點夠膽喺大6做生意

  • @wendylam3768
    @wendylam37685 ай бұрын

    恭喜蕭生,已達90萬訂閱!希望您喺退休前達到100萬訂閱!❤️❤️💪💪

  • @user-yn2fc5ob5c
    @user-yn2fc5ob5c5 ай бұрын

    谢谢分享。👍😄

  • @pedtsukonin686
    @pedtsukonin6865 ай бұрын

    蠍子改不了刺人的。點樣都係一樣會走回那條路的。

  • @user-fs9ky2cp4f
    @user-fs9ky2cp4f5 ай бұрын

    支持😊

  • @Bertcool
    @Bertcool5 ай бұрын

    我唔係聽得幾明白4:40嗰張圖,到底嗰250B係total equity還是new deposit? 如果只係new deposit, 咁以前咁多年積累仲儲著幾多? 如果係equity就大L鑊了,即係差唔多撤走晒。

  • @user-fu1ns3cp7f
    @user-fu1ns3cp7f5 ай бұрын

    边个仲信你中国吖完全冇保障。😅笑话。😅😅😅

  • @sandfinch930
    @sandfinch9305 ай бұрын

    暖心的新闻!!!

  • @charling2429
    @charling24295 ай бұрын

    🙏🙏🙏

  • @brossardli9542
    @brossardli95425 ай бұрын

    努力!👍💪

  • @kpyeung799
    @kpyeung7995 ай бұрын

    杯弓蛇影?恭喜!

  • @michelleau7230
    @michelleau72305 ай бұрын

    感謝蕭生詳細報導分析。

  • @wongchikeung5775
    @wongchikeung57755 ай бұрын

    ❤❤❤

  • @peterwong7599
    @peterwong75995 ай бұрын

    謝謝蕭生的分析。

  • @candyho1358
    @candyho13585 ай бұрын

    叫外資唔怕就難。

  • @wuandy7342
    @wuandy73425 ай бұрын

    什么都是国家security,

  • @tungminglee5979
    @tungminglee59795 ай бұрын

    🙏感謝分享👍

  • @manyuklau5745
    @manyuklau57455 ай бұрын

    😂😂❤

  • @user-wc9it9rk1u
    @user-wc9it9rk1u5 ай бұрын

    來自香港嘅外商投資不一定係內資‘洗白’。好多中國公司特別喺香港有上市嘅可以透過喺海外集資,再轉美金投番入國內。國內好多城市都有爭取外資投資嘅壓力,而呢D從香港番嚟嘅假外資就可以幫到手。未爆煲前好多內房喺香港發債,部分資金就會攞去買一D預留俾外資買嘅地,不過肯定就係D細城市,唔係北上廣深。

  • @Jimmyhunter888
    @Jimmyhunter8885 ай бұрын

    哇,大哥,不是吧你没看新闻😅😅😅

  • @upwahok2013
    @upwahok20135 ай бұрын

    🎉❤

  • @lawrenceyeung3381
    @lawrenceyeung33815 ай бұрын

    恭喜達到90萬訂閱🎉

  • @a8a999
    @a8a9995 ай бұрын

    關於Emily Chen的case, 其實沒有老蕭説的那麽簡單。Emily服務的公司與國防部有關,老共要求Emily刺探有關與國防部生意資料,可能合作不順利,老共惱羞成怒就把Emily關起來了。

  • @yangmiemie8
    @yangmiemie85 ай бұрын

    👍👍👍🙏

  • @douglaslim8560
    @douglaslim85605 ай бұрын

    90萬訂閱,恭喜🎉

  • @user-lf9wj7sh9z
    @user-lf9wj7sh9z5 ай бұрын

    二十三条不可能拖慢,最大能是二十三条同国安法合并,并减辣。

  • @michelleau7230
    @michelleau72305 ай бұрын

    💪💪💪💪💪💪💪💪💪💪💪💪💪

  • @hungfaili19
    @hungfaili195 ай бұрын

    Support and like Mr Shiu

  • @causeandeffect8474
    @causeandeffect84745 ай бұрын

    恭喜蕭生🎉步步高升😊

  • @aq8422
    @aq84225 ай бұрын

    二十三條立法不會下架因为是面子問題

  • @AlbertoGonzalez-mp8fq
    @AlbertoGonzalez-mp8fq5 ай бұрын

    👍👍👍👏😀

  • @charling2429
    @charling24295 ай бұрын

    恭喜蕭生

  • @alfredhillington173
    @alfredhillington1735 ай бұрын

    彩虹說的好🎉

  • @yellowduckhk
    @yellowduckhk5 ай бұрын

    恭喜蕭先生有90萬訂閱🎉

  • @tsemankit1
    @tsemankit15 ай бұрын

    換一個角度,中國共產政權根本不想外國投資中國.現在中國的政策其實就是毛澤東在六0年代的政策.這根本不意外. 所以英國保守承諾讓要自由的香港人可用BNO去到英國去. 香港和中國的沒落其實是你知習知大家都知.所以沒落的風景獨好.

  • @co-Tan1010
    @co-Tan10105 ай бұрын

    祝蕭生 步步高升 身體健康 ☺🌻🌻🌻

  • @braggfinnick2210
    @braggfinnick22105 ай бұрын

    齋睇恆指就知外國全撤資la

  • @bjkbgk7373
    @bjkbgk73735 ай бұрын

    风景这边独好----看

  • @GDKNDJN
    @GDKNDJN5 ай бұрын

    離開中國漸成人類共識,無人就無間諜啦

  • @karenng6699
    @karenng66995 ай бұрын

    祝蕭生順利邁進過百万訂閱不過請別那麽快退休啊謝謝分享👍👍👍👍👍👍

  • @tonyjar333
    @tonyjar3335 ай бұрын

    問題是,為什麼還有17%?

  • @joanneliew9225
    @joanneliew92255 ай бұрын

    TQ Mr Tsui, I learned so much from you. You are very knowledgeable.

  • @phil88
    @phil885 ай бұрын

    恭喜萧生订阅达到90万,离100万已经不远!🎉❤

  • @pandoralee8707
    @pandoralee87075 ай бұрын

    🙏thanks for info and support you.

  • @james1018
    @james10185 ай бұрын

    蕭生我一向都支持你的但關於講到換人方面,應該是想多了,最切實就係撤回23條就是代表最有誠意

  • @DonRua
    @DonRua5 ай бұрын

    As an investment analyst based in the West, but originally from Hong Kong, I've spent years away from my hometown. I rely heavily on news updates and financial metrics for my work, and I appreciate channels like this one that help me stay connected to my roots. However, it's crucial for responsible journalism to give proper credit to sources quoted. Failing to do so can amount to plagiarism, which is a serious academic offense. The content of this program seems to have been drawn from a Bloomberg article titled "China just recorded the lowest level of foreign direct investment since 1993," published on February 19, 2024, at 4:31 PM CST. Please reply for clarification.

  • @DonRua

    @DonRua

    5 ай бұрын

    @@gracetsai In the fast-paced world of stock analysis, we are bombarded with a multitude of geopolitical and macroeconomic events daily. Amidst this influx, we, as stock analysts, can only dedicate our attention to a fraction of these events. With limited time to delve into the details, we often rely on the insights and analyses provided by researchers and reporters to inform our investment decisions. However, there are times when we encounter content that appears to be copied or plagiarized from other sources. In such instances, it's essential to exercise caution and question the integrity of the information presented. My recent inquiry regarding a Chinese KZread report stemmed from this concern. While I initially raised apprehensions, further clarification revealed that my concerns were unfounded. Upon understanding the translation of the original writer's work, I realized that my inquiry was based on a misunderstanding. It was not intended as an accusation but rather as a genuine inquiry seeking clarification. Having received satisfactory responses, I am content and have no further actions or precautions to take.

  • @DonRua
    @DonRua5 ай бұрын

    Translation 作為一名在西方從事投資分析的人,但原籍香港,我已經離開我的家鄉很多年了。我非常依賴新聞更新和財務指標進行我的工作,並且我感謝像這樣的頻道,它能讓我與家鄉保持聯繫。然而,負責任的新聞報道需要給予引用來源應有的認可。否則,這可能被視為剽竊,這是一個嚴重的學術不端行為。 本節目的內容似乎源自彭博社於2024年2月19日下午4:31發表的一篇文章,題為《中國剛剛記錄了自1993年以來最低水平的外商直接投資》。 請回復以便澄清。

  • @DonRua

    @DonRua

    5 ай бұрын

    Translation 在快節奏的股票分析世界中,我們每天都被大量的地緣政治和宏觀經濟事件所淹沒。在這樣的情況下,作為股票分析師,我們只能將我們的注意力集中在其中的一小部分事件上。由於時間有限,我們通常依賴於研究人員和記者提供的見解和分析來指導我們的投資決策。 然而,有時候我們會遇到一些內容,這些內容似乎是從其他來源複製或剽竊而來的。在這種情況下,我們需要謹慎行事,質疑所呈現信息的完整性。我最近對一個中文KZread報告的詢問源於這種擔憂。雖然我最初提出了顧慮,但進一步的澄清顯示我的擔憂是沒有根據的。 在了解了原作者的作品的翻譯後,我意識到我的詢問是基於一個誤解。這並不是一個指控,而是一個真誠的詢問,旨在尋求澄清。在收到令人滿意的回答後,我感到滿意,並且不需要進一步採取任何行動或預防措施。

  • @vivaldihk
    @vivaldihk5 ай бұрын

    即係Benchmarking都拉得

  • @Ec2820_cc
    @Ec2820_cc5 ай бұрын

    吓?!宣揚民主都係間䜓分裂國家??終國外交部成日都話終國係民主,習近平係民主喎?!😂😂😂

  • @kinmanyu6635

    @kinmanyu6635

    5 ай бұрын

    民健联夠話民主啦😂民健联全名"民主健港聯盟😢😅😂

Келесі