Wittgenstein vs the Vienna Circle - in verse! Tractatus fans are attacked by the book's own author!

Wittgenstein senses that, with their high regard for his Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus, Vienna's Logical Positivists have got the wrong end of the stick! A dramatic rethink of how we use words and expressions leads to his later work 'Philosophical Investigations', including Language Games and a talking lion.
#philosophy #wittgenstein #tractatus #viennacircle #logicalpositivism #languagegames #philosophicalinvestigations

Пікірлер: 14

  • @kingdm8315
    @kingdm8315Ай бұрын

    fucking loves how it rhymes

  • @philosoverses

    @philosoverses

    Ай бұрын

    cheers! 👍

  • @GottfriedLeibnizYT
    @GottfriedLeibnizYT2 ай бұрын

    6:31 * *QUINE JOINS THE CHAT* *

  • @bobbyrne9697
    @bobbyrne96972 ай бұрын

    Analytic philosophy in verse, how ridiculous. I love it.

  • @philosoverses

    @philosoverses

    2 ай бұрын

    Cheers!! 👍

  • @rifkinr4660
    @rifkinr46604 ай бұрын

    This is superb, thanks so much for the infotainment

  • @philosoverses

    @philosoverses

    4 ай бұрын

    Thank you! 👍

  • @loge10
    @loge103 ай бұрын

    I've had an instinctive attraction to Wittgenstein for some time but don't have the mental faculties to comprehend him head-on. Assuming you're interpretation is reliable, I found this very helpful to understand why I might be so attracted to his thought. Thanks.

  • @philosoverses

    @philosoverses

    3 ай бұрын

    👍 Thanks, that’s great to hear - though you’re wise to include a caveat about interpretations, especially with Wittgenstein!

  • @loge10

    @loge10

    2 ай бұрын

    You're welcome. I should also add that how you expressed it with very creative in how you got to the essence of the material (as it were). It was an effective combination of being both entertaining and validating.

  • @fleurafricaine5740
    @fleurafricaine5740Ай бұрын

    Which philosopher actually did write in verse?

  • @willieluncheonette5843
    @willieluncheonette5843Ай бұрын

    " This is for the real adepts in madness, who have gone beyond all psychiatry, psychoanalysis, who are unhelpable. This third book is again the work of a German, Ludwig Wittgenstein. Just listen to its title: TRACTATUS LOGICO PHILOSOPHICUS. We will just call it TRACTATUS. It is one of the most difficult books in existence. Even a man like G.E.Moore, a great English philosopher, and Bertrand Russell, another great philosopher - not only English but a philosopher of the whole world - both agreed that this man Wittgenstein was far superior to them both. Ludwig Wittgenstein was really a lovable man. I don't hate him, but I don't dislike him. I like him and I love him, but not his book. His book is only gymnastics. Only once in a while after pages and pages you may come across a sentence which is luminous. For example: That which cannot be spoken should not be spoken; one should be silent about it. Now this is a beautiful statement. Even saints, mystics, poets, can learn much from this sentence. That which cannot be spoken must not be spoken of. Wittgenstein writes in a mathematical way, small sentences, not even paragraphs - sutras. But for the very advanced insane man this book can be of immense help. It can hit him exactly in his soul, not only in the head. Just like a nail it can penetrate into his very being. That may wake him from his nightmare. Ludwig Wittgenstein was a lovable man. He was offered one of the most cherished chairs of philosophy at Oxford. He declined. That's what I love in him. He went to become a farmer and fisherman. This is lovable in the man. This is more existential than Jean-Paul Sartre, although Wittgenstein never talked of existentialism. Existentialism, by the way, cannot be talked about; you have to live it, there is no other way. This book was written when Wittgenstein was studying under G.E.Moore and Bertrand Russell. Two great philosophers of Britain, and a German... it was enough to create TRACTATUS LOGICO PHILOSOPHICUS. Translated it means Wittgenstein, Moore and Russell. I, on my part, would rather have seen Wittgenstein sitting at the feet of Gurdjieff than studying with Moore and Russell. That was the right place for him, but he missed. Perhaps next time, I mean next life... for him, not for me. For me this is enough, this is the last. But for him, at least once he needs to be in the company of a man like Gurdjieff or Chuang Tzu, Bodhidharma - but not Moore, Russell, not Whitehead. He was associating with these people, the wrong people. A right man in the company of wrong people, that's what destroyed him. My experience is, in the right company even a wrong person becomes right, and vice-versa: in a wrong company, even a right person becomes wrong. But this only applies to unenlightened men, right or wrong, both. An enlightened person cannot be influenced. He can associate with anyone - Jesus with Magdalena, a prostitute; Buddha with a murderer, a murderer who had killed nine hundred and ninety-nine people. He had taken a vow to kill one thousand people, and he was going to kill Buddha too; that's how he came into contact with Buddha. The murderer's name is not known. The name people gave to him was Angulimala, which means 'the man who wears a garland of fingers'. That was his way. He would kill a man, cut off his fingers and put them on his garland, just to keep count of the number of people he had killed. Only ten fingers were missing to make up the thousand; in other words only one man more.... Then Buddha appeared. He was just moving on that road from one village to another. Angulimala shouted, "Stop!" Buddha said, "Great. That's what I have been telling people: Stop! But, my friend, who listens?" Angulimala looked amazed: Is this man insane? And Buddha continued walking towards Angulimala. Angulimala again shouted, "Stop! It seems you don't know that I am a murderer, and I have taken a vow to kill one thousand people. Even my own mother has stopped seeing me, because only one person is missing.... I will kill you... but you look so beautiful that if you stop and turn back I may not kill you." Buddha said, "Forget about it. I have never turned back in my life, and as far as stopping is concerned, I stopped forty years ago; since then there is nobody left to move. And as far as killing me is concerned, you can do it anyway. Everything born is going to die." Angulimala saw the man, fell at his feet, and was transformed. Angulimala could not change Buddha, Buddha changed Angulimala. Magdalena the prostitute could not change Jesus, but Jesus changed the woman. So what I said is only applicable to so-called ordinary humanity, it is not applicable to those who are awakened. Wittgenstein can become awakened; he could have become awakened even in this life. Alas, he associated with wrong company. But his book can be of great help to those who are really third-degree insane. If they can make any sense out of it, they will come back to sanity."

  • @WMedl

    @WMedl

    13 күн бұрын

    By the way, Wittgenstein was an Austrian, a German never could have written such books or could have thought such thoughts... And that language and thus knowledge are social affairs....

  • @willieluncheonette5843

    @willieluncheonette5843

    13 күн бұрын

    @@WMedl thank you for pointing out his birthplace.