You forgot Laika, first space dog 🐕

@bepyn4ik

2 жыл бұрын

May you live forever in our hearts. RIP Laika

@GloballinksEconomic

10 ай бұрын

Do not bring dog to the moon because haram for Islam

@emily-clark

2 ай бұрын

He's talking about humans

Actually one person to blame is Breznev itself. If Kruschev was in charge he would have quickly found someone that could replace korolev. Breznev didn’t care about space

Because nobody landed on the moon

@kalasatwater2224

4 күн бұрын

Exactly

So nobody talks about brezhnevs eyebrows 🤣

@carmenenersen6819

4 жыл бұрын

I know, what the fuck is that all about?

@ALI3NPROFESS0R

4 жыл бұрын

@@carmenenersen6819 ikr

@rickyb1903

4 жыл бұрын

Im afraid there was but only one lone eyebrow there, my friend.

@Charlesputnam-bn9zy

4 жыл бұрын

@@rickyb1903 Precisely for being the retrieved awfoul-joe's mustache. (probably done when Nikita reburied his remains beside Kirov's tomb in 1960.)

@Charlesputnam-bn9zy

4 жыл бұрын

Because it was awfoul joe's mustache salvaged and glued on adipose leonid's brow.

Thank you so much, for so many years I always wanted to know the Soviet side of space race.

@Tracywalden2424

4 жыл бұрын

TRIPPLE JAY learn learn learn history it’s good for your 🧠

@justinpersad401

3 жыл бұрын

Same here

@genseek00

3 жыл бұрын

The Soviets' public image is that they build bulky robust machinery. In reality, at least in the reality of space exploration, the Soviets built very agile, viable, robust and very reliable machinery compared to the US. If you dive a bit deeper into the space exploration it becomes apparent. "The Russians used a pencil" although not accurate, but true in being able to reflect the Soviet attitude to the space exploration. Another example: Soyuz is the most reliable by far flying apparatus (measured by the ratio between successful flights and fatal failures), it is so much smaller than the Shuttle. Although, all said here about the N1 rocket and its unfortunate faith is true, the Soviets were not very keen on sending men to the Moon. They considered it would cost less and deliver more to send other unmanned crafts to the Moon. And they done it. First fly-by, then crush-landing, then soft landing, than lunokhod (1 and 2). The latter was a rover sent to the Moon. It was driven from Earth. All these missions accuired more valuable scientific data per dollar spent than the manned flight. What the Soviets did not count on is the propagandistic value though.

@umegghju

Жыл бұрын

If you want to know that side, simply search the life of the ucrainian engineer who developed the whole program. When he died the soviet space program to moon finished, he was sent to work in a gold mine as punishment for being too good. Read his life: Sergej Pavlovič Korolëv

The Soviets' public image is that they build bulky, rugged, but robust machinery. In reality, at least in the reality of space exploration, the Soviets built very agile, viable, robust, cost optimized and very reliable machinery. This in contrast to what the US did. If you dive a bit deeper into the space exploration history, this becomes apparent. "The Russians used a pencil" -- although not accurate, but true in reflecting the Soviet attitude to the space exploration. Another example: Soyuz is the most reliable by far flying apparatus even to this day (measured by the ratio between successful flights and fatal failures), it is so much smaller and lighter than the Shuttle. Although, all said here about the N1 rocket and its unfortunate faith is largely true, the Soviets were never very keen on sending men to the Moon, because it was not efficient at all. They realized it would cost them less and deliver more scientific data to send unmanned crafts to the Moon instead. And they've done it. First fly-by, then crush-landing, then soft landing then the Lunokhods (1 and 2). The latter was a rover sent to the Moon. It was driven from Earth. All these missions acquired way more precious scientific data, per dollar spent, than the manned flight. What the Soviets did not count on is the propagandistic value though. P.S. Fun fact about the remotely controlled Moon rover Lunokhod. There were two teams trained to drive the rover. They would receive the data from its sensors, analyse it and give commands to the machine accordingly. One team worked for approx 10 minutes and then they transferred the control to the other team. This was because of enormous pressure and exhaustion of the teams. The team members were chosen, particularly, on how reliable they were. They were told that the whole program costed the people this and so much of workers money and that they are morally responsible for the money (actually "effort" instead of "money", as the Soviets tried to push attention away from "money").

@occhamite

7 ай бұрын

A bigger bunch of nonsense I have rarely seen. Soviet rockets were heavy, inefficient and unreliable. the dry stage weights of the N1 were 2- to -6 times the corresponding weights for Saturn V. The Soviets never mastered LH2 in the space race era, nor could they build a large rocket engine of the F1 class. The Saturn series had a perfect record, while N1 failed 4 time s in a row. Only one mission out of the entire Zond series could have returned a man alive, Soyuz killed 4 men, IN SPACE, in its first few years of operation, while Apollo lost 3 in a GROUND test, and sent men to the Moon 27 times. The Russians were FAR behind the US in almost every way.

@genseek00

7 ай бұрын

@@occhamite okay, let's be factual. We take your first sentence and focus on reliability. What is the ratio of people returned alive who flew the shuttle to the total number of shuttle passengers? What is the ratio of those flying Soyuz. (Hint: Soyuz holds the record of most reliable and safest space ship ever built.) Below is a list Soviet firsts. How does it compare to the US firsts? 1957: First intercontinental ballistic missile and orbital launch vehicle, the R-7 Semyorka. 1957: First satellite, Sputnik 1. 1957: First animal in Earth orbit, the dog Laika on Sputnik-2. 1959: First rocket ignition in Earth orbit, first man-made object to escape Earth's gravity, Luna-1. 1959: First data communications, or telemetry, to and from outer space, Luna 1. 1959: First man-made object to pass near the Moon, first man-made object in Heliocentric orbit, Luna 1. 1959: First probe to impact the Moon, Luna 2. 1959: First images of the Moon's far side, Luna 3. 1960: First animals to safely return from Earth orbit, the dogs Belka and Strelka on Sputnik-5. 1961: First probe launched to Venus, Veneta 1. 1961: First person in space (International definition) and in Earth orbit. 1961: First person to spend over 24 hours in space German Titov on Vostok 2 (also first person to sleep in space). 1962: First dual crewed spaceflight, Vostok 3.and 4. 1962: First probe launched to Mars, Mars 1. 1963: First woman in space. 1964: First multi-person crew (3). 1965: First extra-vehicular activity (that is, first space walk). 1965: First radio telescope in space, Zond 3. 1965: First probe to hit another planet of the Venera 3. 1966: First probe to make a soft landing on and transmit from the surface of the Moon, Luna 9. 1966: First probe in lunar orbit, Luna 10. 1966: first image of the whole Earth. 1967: First uncrewed rendezvous and docking. 1968: First living beings to reach the Moon (circumlunar flights) and return unharmed to Earth. 1969: First docking between two crewed craft in Earth orbit and exchange of crews. 1970: First soil samples automatically extracted and returned to Earth from another celestial body, Luna 16. 1970: First robotic space rover, Lunokhod 1 on the Moon. 1970: First full interplanetary travel with a soft landing and useful data transmission. Data received from the surface of another planet Venus of the Solar System. 1971: First space station. 1971: First probe to impact the surface of Mars. 1971: First probe to land on Mars, Mars 3. 1971: First armed space station. 1975: First probe to orbit Venus, to make a soft landing on Venus, first photos from the surface of Venus. 1980: First Asian person in space, Vietnamese Cosmonaut and First Latin American, Cuban and person with African ancestry in space. 1984: First Indian Astronaut in space. 1984: First woman to perform a space walk. 1986: First crew to visit two separate space stations. 1986: First probes to deploy robotic balloons into Venus atmosphere and to return pictures of a comet during close flyby. 1986: First permanently crewed space station, Mir, 1986-2001, with a permanent presence on board (1989-1999). 1987: First crew to spend over one year in space. 1988: First fully automated flight of a spaceplane (Buran). Since you intend/pretend to be factual, who are the people you referred to as "The Russians"? As far as I know Russia was not an independent county during the space race. Russians made up less than 50% of the Soviet population.

You forgot about: Luna-10 first spacecraft to orbit Moon Luna-16 first robotic sample return from the Moon Luna-17 (Lunokhod-1) first robotic rover on the Moon Zond-5 first spacecraft with animals on board successfully orbit the Moon and safely return to the Earth.

nice video

Even 🇺🇸 USA never Landed to the Moon!

@lucabuca2449

3 жыл бұрын

You are delusional

Ah yiss, the closed loop nk-33 rockets! Super efficient!

The title should be "How the Soviets tricked Americans landing humans on the Moon 😁"

Three absolutely necessary things made the USA Apollo program a success: 1. Lunar orbit method - lessened the total weight that landed on the moon, 2. Understanding and solving the orbital mechanics in real time for docking, 3. Integrated computer circuits that were 100% reliable. Had the USSR solved these problems by 1969?

@unphazd5137

4 жыл бұрын

Not sure the US had either lol

@aimeeread3898

4 жыл бұрын

to understand Nasa's agenda you first must 1. Realise they lost technology to go to the moon 2. Earth resources are abundant but are not infinite 3. The Van Allen Radiation belt prevents All life from leaving Earth 4.All Earth orbiting satellites are not in space,, in order to "orbit earth" they must be in Earths Gravity Field,, open Space has NO gravity field 5. the Gravity field of the Solar system based around the Sun makes earth orbit the Sun,, This Means Earth is Inside of the Suns gravity field 6. Whilst INSIDE a SOLAR SYSTEM you are not in SPACE ,, think of Solar systems as a WHIRLPOOL in the Ocean ,, Nothing living ever been to the Ocean of Space we Only spin around in our little whirlpool called OUR SOLAR SYSTEM .....

@TheNYgolfer

4 жыл бұрын

@Dwight Magnuson 1. German Aerospace Engineer and Space Architect who defected to the US after the war, Werner Von Braun

@lesta_official

2 жыл бұрын

what are you talking about the USSR at that moment landed its lunar rover there before the US astronauts without a pilot it was very difficult at that time the USSR had the best computers and powerful

@dwightmagnuson4298

2 жыл бұрын

@@lesta_official Read the summary on Wikipedia "history of computing in the Soviet Union". It was in the late 1970s when the USSR had the capability to build a digital computer (small enough) to land an astronaut on the moon.

They don't teach this in school. Important stuff!!

The Russian Luna missions frequently carried tape players that played recorded cosmonaut chatter back with the radio telemetry. This gave the impression that these missions were manned when they were simply robot probes and landers.

@occhamite

7 ай бұрын

Yeah, but not for long. Pretty soon, people listening saw that it was a recording they were listening to.

Well they did on as Neil said his famous line the soviets flew past, they then were force to try to land, but they crashed on the moon around 100 miles away from Neil and his crew,

@jesusramirezromo2037

4 жыл бұрын

That was an unmaned Luna mission Rushed to beat the US at least in sameple return

@darth856

3 жыл бұрын

@@jesusramirezromo2037 and there was also a rushed attempt to get a lunar rover there, but the rocket exploded after launch.

4:39 No small consolation: The Soviets clearly won the long coveted Epic Eyebrow Race. Well done LB… well done comrade

Very interesting

Captured German scientists took the Soviets close to the moon. Like captured German Warner for the US on the moon.

@pavel8485

Жыл бұрын

Well, no, they did not.

@h1lp132

11 ай бұрын

@@pavel8485they did

What company did they sell the improved N1s to?

0:17 the cosmometicsnaut walked in the space of a water tank. Which explains the bizarre air bubbles on the very 1st pictures taken in the West on curved b/w TV screens, as they were relayed from soviet b/w tv.

You spelt Yuri Gagarin's name wrong

this vid deserves more likes!

@marka9261

4 жыл бұрын

here yo go , like earned !

Those rocket's that were a sold to the USA were the best rocket's ever built. They couldn't build them todat they were that good. There's a great back story to these rocket's from construction, storage and finely their sale to USA, wotht watching. ✌️☘️

Holly S if the 5 one had worked!

Thanks for Senley Kubrick who makeed the impossible is possible ....as america proverbs says : if you can't make it fake it

@JohnM3665570

9 ай бұрын

Apollo Moon landings weren't faked.

In so many years USSR failed to launch man on the moon and modern Russia didn't do that as well, while the US did it, not just once, but 5 times in a row and all 5 gone well? And, at the same time, we all know how easy it is to manipulate reports and pretend the job's done instead of doing it? And since then the US itself can't repeat it? Elon Musk spends years and billions to teach his rockets reverse and land softly, but in the 60s it was possible? 25 bln$ in 13 years is not even that much, it's as much as just one annual NASA budget today! No, I don' believe you guys. All in the US is about marketing and exaggerated claims and this one is the king of fake claims

@hbk1676

2 жыл бұрын

Yeah

The Sino-Russian moon base is coming. The Brazilian Mars Mission is coming. Get the popcorn and seat...

@username88094

2 жыл бұрын

Brazilian? Idk about that one man. I think Brazil should fix its issues and debt before going to the moon. I’d leave the moon. To the superpowers of the world. Aka China, Russia, America, etc

Proof that geed, selfishness or monetary gain is not the only driving factor for human progress.

@Mechaghostman2

4 жыл бұрын

The USSR exploited people just the same. It's just it was the politicians that were greedy, instead of business owners. Not to mention the black markets in the USSR. Also, the USSR wasn't exactly going into space for peaceful reasons. Furthermore, both the USA and USSR were using rocket technology created in Nazi Germany. The Nazis, despite their name, were not socialists.

That is an easy one . Answer is . Because you can't go to the moon. PERIOD !

@JohnM3665570

9 ай бұрын

Why not?

Because they were first to land a rover called Lunokhod-1 and found out that it's a waste of money but Americans needed to redeem themselves somehow with propaganda points so they spent money on risking human lives put on the Moon.

@AW33406

3 жыл бұрын

Wrong

@AW33406

3 жыл бұрын

If it was a waste of money why did they build 4 massively expensive N1 rockets?

@fekingpeteroden9295

3 жыл бұрын

@@AW33406 That’s such a pathetic question

@AW33406

3 жыл бұрын

@@fekingpeteroden9295 wah wah Soviet fanboy, NASA is flying drones on mars right now, the Soviets are gone and Roscosmos hasn't done shit but launch the same 60 year old Soyuz.

@fekingpeteroden9295

3 жыл бұрын

@@AW33406 American huh 🤔

I found that correct 👍

50s and 60's. Lol most ppl didn't even have phones or electricity , but the USA went to the moon lol, and they talked to the president from the moon. That worked first time too lol. What a crock

But the soviets never intended to go to the moon, they said so. like the Aesop Fable fox which spurned the raisins he couldn't reach as too sour.

@AW33406

3 жыл бұрын

shut up

@Charlesputnam-bn9zy

3 жыл бұрын

@@AW33406 you 1st

But Apple made a movie that said the USSR was first to the moon, and since Apple, Google and Facebook are now in charge of History, so it must be “true”.

@Mechaghostman2

4 жыл бұрын

First to the moon with probes, but never to the moon with people.

@YPR4022

4 жыл бұрын

@@Mechaghostman2 😁😂do u think nasa made a man on the moon.....its completely a trash....if really nasa made man on the moon then why not still nasa sens back there astronauts to moon mean while nasa using Soviet built Soyuz International space station....

@Mechaghostman2

4 жыл бұрын

@@YPR4022 We sent ours to the Moon because we didn't want the Soviets to be the only ones there. We didn't want the Soviets to be the only ones there because we didn't want them to have a militaristic advantage on us. When the Soviets gave up, we didn't want to spend money on it anymore. Read a book.

@motard126

4 жыл бұрын

Prathap Reddy you are an idiot.

@jesusramirezromo2037

4 жыл бұрын

Ahh yes Nowdays pepole need to cleary have a "This is fiction" sign on movies abd sbows The whole concept of For All Man J Kind is What If? Scenario; What if the soviets landed on the moon first? Do you watch Once Upon A Time In Hollywood and get mad they don't out a "this is an alternate take, on what if Sharon Tate survived?

I don’t think they had or still have the capability

Sergei Pavlovich Korolev was not a rocket engineer he was good in logistics, rare, very rare feet for Russians and as for drones, well the US never did find any of them left over, so there is that, that being said the Soviet Space Program had one big major fault there rocket ignition fears during the early years that would persist

I wonder until today still have ppl saying Soviet union is d first man on the moon.

2:49 Umm why on earth you put something that is not about the moon race...

no area 51

Yep that's why there's a big burn I baikonur

@Charlesputnam-bn9zy

4 жыл бұрын

& they didn't even have enuf water to turn it into a pool.

@mroofersandthesquad2600

4 жыл бұрын

@@Charlesputnam-bn9zy xd

These engines were built by a jet engine factory

@jesusramirezromo2037

4 жыл бұрын

I mean, it was that, or going with Valentin Glushko's idea and using horrible hypergolic toxic fueles

Interesting how they copied virtually everything there a space shuttle was virtually identical except it really was not successful

@jesusramirezromo2037

4 жыл бұрын

Nope The Buran was COMPLETLEY difrent in every single way it functioned The only similarity is the airframe wich they purposfully modeled afterthe shuttle thinking the US would only build such a stupidly expensive machine for military purposes

0:16 1st space walk filmed inside a water tank = 1st pictures of the moon 's hidden face painted on a canvas & then photographed.

The mood in Russia must have been awful as news came through of America landing on the moon.

@lesta_official

2 жыл бұрын

the Soviets could easily have been the first to land a man on the moon , there were other goals and the moonwalkers landed themselves without pilots at that time it was beyond the limit despite everything, the Soviets had the most powerful and best computers at that time, then the Soviet buran without pilots could automatically land on the castle like an airplane!

@TheSwords99

10 ай бұрын

The US never landed on the moon

In America we make rockets to send people to space, in Soviet Russia they make people to send rockets to space

Russia beat the US in every space race… INCLUDING one, that never happened. Fixed it fir you.

The Moon Isn't In Space

There were eight Luna missions done by the Soviets six of them failed I don’t hear you mention these

@moosa1037

4 жыл бұрын

Also, the USSR named its missions only after they occurred in case they resulted in absolute failure and could be covered up.

Why did the soviet engineers not say (hey we can't waist money, time & developement for the N1 & its launch pands. So let's just use what we have, the soyuz. Give it 5 NK15 engine's & put the lander, the soyuz & the extra propulsion in orbit separately???) Even if the Soviets wouldn't have beaten the US to the moon they could have at least landed eventually, why did they not do that let alone think about that??!!!.

3:04 usually when some one explodes you don't have an open cascet

@Tracywalden2424

4 жыл бұрын

Aiden Goodrich you are a heartless human .

@aidengoodrich5974

4 жыл бұрын

@@Tracywalden2424 i apologize it was insensitive and i probably shouldn't have said it

@Mechaghostman2

4 жыл бұрын

I explode like that when I eat Taco Bell. :D

@richardpaulhall

2 жыл бұрын

There was a crash landing and fire, no explosion.

Any video from russains on the moon?

It was a race of who got the best nazi scientists after the war. Imagine if they were all working together for good? They were sent to many nations. Egypt I think it was... got one and there's a bunch of interesting stuff around his efforts. I think he ended up in Canada building a monster launch thing like a massive gun or something, I might be mixing up a couple guys. Lol

Well, they did send a dog into orbit. So there’s that.

@TheSwords99

10 ай бұрын

Did the dog land on the moon?

& the Apollo 11 launch Day was the day ted drowned his girlfriend, & became lord chappaquickdick. He was invited to watch Apollo 11 departure for the Moon, but spurned it for some wetter pleasure.

The russian know you cant pass through the radiation belt

@JohnM3665570

9 ай бұрын

Why can't you pass through the radiation belt? It isn't lethal especially with shielding and going through quickly.

Have a Russian ever been on the moon? If so when?

@spaceflighthistory5362

3 жыл бұрын

Not yet. Dmitry Rogozin, the man who currently runs Roscosmos is planning to send the first group of cosmonauts in moon orbit and later on onto the moon surface in about 2029. They have already started building the rocket, which is called Yenisei. The soviets might have gotten to the moon during the space race as well, but with Korolev's and Komarov's death, Korolev's personal fight with Glushko and the lack of funds were the reason of the N1 launch failure. If Korolev was still alive until the end of the Space race, chances are that the soviets would have been on the moon as well. All those tragedies were a big setback for the Soviet Space Programme. Lets also not forget that Leonid Ilyich Brezhnev was not really interested in space. If successfully developed, Yenisei will provide Russia with a launch capability that can service deep space exploration and missions to the Moon, Mars, and other bodies in the Solar System.

We now know the soviets crashed into the moon in a failed attempt at landing. They're own data proved it to be a one way trip & they still went! #Cosmonauts!

AMERICANS should Thank Soviet Union for such technology ...

Competition that would it brought better results in foreign policy, if there wasn't one to begin with instead of a collaboration and unity of 2 superpower countries for space travel.. FROM the start would it been more examples of alliance and encourage all POSSIBILITIES to achieve bases and colonizing mars, moon, Venus or any other cosmic body.. by now we probably would have discovered many rare and extremely stronger minerals that could help out more our civilization to reached other levels higher and more advanced technology, or other sources of energy but the reality of the fact is sad, because unfortunately the self greed and tyranny of a small group of families with the sources of making our world a different better world have gone very much out of their way to keep average person under suppression of all that means life information and many great events of innovation in our history from happening...thank you GOVERNMENTS...for selling out freedoms in exchange of security to this very families..

1:35 look at all those stars... Now, that s a REAL picture from the moon right there. Not like what hogwash everyone started cooking after 69.

@JohnM3665570

9 ай бұрын

Where are the stars at 1:35 ? That photo wasn't taken on the lunar surface like the Apollo photos were which had the camera settings adjusted to be able to photograph the Moon's surface. The stars were too dim for the camera to photograph them.

Did USA really made to the moon?🤔

@JohnM3665570

9 ай бұрын

Yes.

The USA beat the USSR to the Moon because US computer technology was light years ahead of the USSR's The USSR was really working with abacuses compared to what the USA's facilities were. Rocket technology, however, was about equal betwen both countries.

@SashaTibelius

2 ай бұрын

Simply not TRUE! Soviet computers with Soviet software were much more advanced than US computers. In 1988 Soviet Space Shuttle Buran made absolutely amazing autonomous flight with Soviet computers onboard.

Soviet could not beat the U.S when it comes to lying, so the U.S won. LOL

@niclas3672

4 жыл бұрын

I think it's funnier that you think it's a lie, when you can literally take a look and see the landing legs of the lunar modules if you get access to a powerful enough telescope.

@niclas3672

4 жыл бұрын

I've looked into moon conspiracies. And none of them bring any evidence.. Some of the footage from the moon would literally be impossible to fake in the 60's. You would need advanced computer animation. How the hell would you fake thousands of tiny dust grains being kicked up and falling in low gravity? IN 1969!??! Would you use thousands of tiny strings? If your answer is yes, just stop. That's ludicrous

@mom6701

4 жыл бұрын

@@niclas3672 I must say this though. None of us and the whole world really knows the fact of that event. NO ONE! But the evidence and the fact about the technology back then, and what happened afterwards suggest that there is a slim possibility that we really did go beyond the orbit. The super strong radiation that is proved to be catastrophic to humans, the historical paper works that got destroyed afterwards, the never again attempted to go back, and the fact that a number of scientists and even those who allegedly went to the world slipped and mentioned the fact that that never happened. If the U.S did in fact land on the moon, they would have kept all the evidence and preserved it in the museum for the younger generations to witness. But they destroyed it all, which suggests that they know if they kept it, it would expose their shadiness to humanity. But it's all late, cos there are always ppl who never believe them, including myself.

@niclas3672

4 жыл бұрын

@@mom6701 Not true. You are referring to the Van Allen Belt, which is a region with a fair amount of radiation. But the apollo astronauts went through it for a very short amount of time, so they weren't exposed to very much radiation. No more than the equivalent of a few X-rays. Also, the US did not destroy all the evidence of the moon landings. They have rocks and soil samples which were brought back, that the public can indeed go see if they feel so inclined. Also, thousands of engineers and scientists worked on the apollo program. You think that thousands of Americans would be a part of this conspiracy and keep it a secret? Ridiculous. Point and case; You could NOT have faked the moon footage with 60s video editing technology. And it would be very difficult even today. Specifically the dust in low gravity. AND you can literally see the remnants of the landers from all the moon landings RIGHT NOW, today. Thousands of astronomers would also have to lie.. Again, that's just ridiculous. And what about the rocket that launched that day? Hundreds of people saw that with their own eyes. My final point, why would they fake it? They spent billions of dollars. They had the technology, and the money to do it. So why risk faking it? It's much more likely they just did it. Because they could.

@mom6701

4 жыл бұрын

@@niclas3672 Except those rock evidence could be found anywhere on earth! remember a rock is a rock is a rock. If they could fake the whole landing, don't you think they thought ahead of how to fake materials gathered from Moon to show? U.S government is the most despicable government on Earth. You should know that. They kill, they spy, they invade, and they will do anything to be perceived as the boss of the world. From Moon Landing, from 9/11, and many atrocious acts against humanity, they have done it successfully. Remember how they tested drugs and infected million of ppl in Africa? Remember how they killed Vietnamese with chemicals? Yep, those are the same ppl you think would tell you the truth about moon landing.

because they don't have hollywood :)

@noah45crisco

4 жыл бұрын

Stupid

I wouldnt say america won, the soviet won it fiar and square. Its like a formula 1 race, its a series of race to determine the winner. Russia won every single race except 1 and america took the championship? Nah it dont work that way

😂

Nothing is impossible in 🇺🇸❤️ forever amen.

@suvignanpothuraju8350

4 жыл бұрын

@@CosmicNihilist yes rocket was built by ex nazi but idea of rocket was not his idea you dumb fuck ,it was started since from 1205.

@diogeneslamplit6573

4 жыл бұрын

@@suvignanpothuraju8350 There were no "nazis" anyway. There was the Third Reich and a nationalist socialist party-name. Nazi was a propaganda slur invented by the allies. Wernher von Braun was a dedicated space explorer who would do what he had to do in order to manifest Mankind's destiny in the stars. It's rumored that when he received the report the first Reich III V2 had hit Britain he commented something to-the-effect "Mission successful--except we hit the wrong planet". I believe that. I'm so glad he was on *our* side in the Cold War. Thanks for your comments. .

@diogeneslamplit6573

4 жыл бұрын

@@CosmicNihilist "Nazi" was a slur concocted by the "allies". In all likelihood it was derived from ashkenazi and probably it was felt this derivation would insult Reich III. All it really did was to demonstrate the puerile nature of the opposition to Reich III. Josef Dhjugashvili had far more innocent blood on his hands based on genocidal motivations---more than Hitler *ever* did---before WW I pt. II ever commenced. Yet the moral/intellectual/physical cripple and the tobacco-filled-phalus-sucking fat drunkard had no problem being photographed with him grinning like chimp-chumps at Yalta. If you want "fast-food propaganda" go look in a mirror and your emphasis on the phony geopolitical nomenclature "Nazi".

@mariamaria2751

Жыл бұрын

@@diogeneslamplit6573 who cares if it was a slur. They deserve a slur after all that went down there in ww two at their hands. ..no one cares

@Samuel42069

9 ай бұрын

​@@diogeneslamplit6573nazi is just form of saying socialist

America hasn't done it either haha

@JohnM3665570

9 ай бұрын

What's your proof they haven't?

First country to lose an experimental animal first country to have astronauts killed on reentry

@KBShow-bw4lj

4 жыл бұрын

First country to reach space , first country to soft land on moon ,first country to soft land mars , first and the ONLY country to reach venus , first satalite , first space station , i can go on but you got the idea i guess

@iron60bitch62

4 жыл бұрын

Golden Legend First country to have a space program bankrupt the entire country and lose their government by the way a soft landing is not done at 400 miles an hour on the moon

@luismarin3500

4 жыл бұрын

IRON60 BITCH Damn calm down, you sound about to cry lmao.

@jesusramirezromo2037

4 жыл бұрын

@@iron60bitch62 Laika was never meant to come back... The soviet space program didn't bankrupt the nation Not to mention the US has 14 space casualties... 17 if you count the apollo 1 fire..... 14 of wich could of been easilly avoided with good managers

@jesusramirezromo2037

4 жыл бұрын

@@iron60bitch62 The soviets did Soft land on the moon, many times.... How do you think they got 2 rovers there?, wich upuntill spirit and oportunity, held the record for longuest distance traveled

The problem on russian, unlike usa, they dont have an areal 51 to shoot that moon landing, their country are all covering with snow that time...

@fekingpeteroden9295

3 жыл бұрын

Really?

Soviets actually beat us there by almost 7 years. :)

Ha ha ha if you believe all that

@sirseal4903

3 жыл бұрын

Ha ha ha if your this uneducated

@michelschuit5895

3 жыл бұрын

@@sirseal4903 you're*

@sirseal4903

3 жыл бұрын

@@michelschuit5895 ok ok i see you

so why didnt the yanks then?

@Astromatter

4 жыл бұрын

dirty chicken They did.... 6 times

@dirtychicken8090

4 жыл бұрын

@@Astromatter yeah right, you believe that i got a bridge to sell ya

@Astromatter

4 жыл бұрын

dirty chicken Prove that we didn’t then....

@dirtychicken8090

4 жыл бұрын

@@Astromatter prove a negative? silly person. Van Allen Belt, just for starters.

@Astromatter

4 жыл бұрын

dirty chicken What does the existence of the Van Allen belts prove?

The Soviets never did eh smart man? 🤣😅🤣😅

And for usa to win they had to make fake videos of landing. 😂. Okay.

UMMM HOW ABOUT WHY THE UNITED STATES NEVER LANDED ON THE MOON!!!

@whitelistqd7815

3 жыл бұрын

Did your parents drop you?

But american never landed on the moon once. It's a big lie

@HyperMODX

9 ай бұрын

Just like your life

@JohnM3665570

9 ай бұрын

Prove it was a lie.

Russia didn't have the balls to fake it!

Thuis bullcrap

Interms of lie information US are always winning😂

Lies all fake

Because nobody landed on the moon

@whitelistqd7815

3 жыл бұрын

Did your parents drop you?