Download Safing's Portmaster and take control of your network traffic: safing.io

@VBB9999

Жыл бұрын

didnt you just said that you should install your apps from software center rather than web browser?

@TheExileFox

Жыл бұрын

Get with the times, even a decade ago, backwards compatibility was bad on windows

@PaulHosler

Жыл бұрын

My upgrade to Fedora 38 went well, mostly. I didn't have video, same thing happened from 36 to 37, so I had to boot from the previous kernel from 37. A week later, after the first update to 38 after installing, everything is running great. I use i3 window manager. In the i3/config, I have it set up to automagically start the apps I want, on the screen I want, in the workspace I want. So when I login, everything is where I want it, no dragging and dropping etc required. Gnome can do that too IIRC, and some other window managers can save your current environment on shutdown, but that doesn't always work.

@imoddi

Жыл бұрын

I am very happy for I have stopped using windows for many years ago! I have used MacOS in almost 10 years! Last time I used windows was windows 7! MacOS is doing everything must better than windows!

@alphaclusters4537

Жыл бұрын

Portmaster is kinda unstable for me. At least in Windows 11 Enterprise. I don't know if it is just me but every time I use their secure DNS, it always tells me that device is offline and later no internet connection even though I am having internet access. Somehow it also disconnects the network too. It also occasionally tells the same even when everything is stable and no secure DNS then later tells that they cannot find DNS so it fallbacks to my original DNS... Edit: Nevermind, the new version solves it for some reason. Quad9 for the win. Still, it would be good if the devs can let their DNS system stable rather than changing some just to make sure you don't disconnect...

I'm helping someone move from Windows to Fedora on an older laptop, and I've gotta say, it's bold of you to assume they delete the installer file after installing the app. When I was backing up their data, the amount of stuff in their download folder was... impressive.

@TheLinuxEXP

Жыл бұрын

Hahah yeah, I’m not surprised

@powerdude_dk

Жыл бұрын

yup... accurate. I suspect most people don't even know it exists.... I've seen A LOT of people who will find the very website they downloaded it from, or even the email with a certain attachment, just to find the file they're looking for. And that's what makes me believe they have no idea where files go....

@SnowyRVulpix

Жыл бұрын

When i use Windows, i never delete the installer either… but i do move it to installers folder on my dropbox… along with debs when i use Linux.

@NeptuneSega

Жыл бұрын

accurate

@stwenty5758

Жыл бұрын

@@SnowyRVulpix That's at least organized (although still confusing to me). I just can't understand people letting their Downloads folder get all cluttered up, regardless of their OS. It makes no sense. Of course, I also get anxiety attacks when I see desktops covered with shortcuts...

There's a funny thing I notice in myself. Whenever I encounter a UI or UX inconsistency on Linux - I hate it and try to fix the issue. Whenever I encounter the same on Windows - it's just expected and I don't care, because the entire system is like this to the point that being inconsistent is kind of consistent.

@k4everut

Жыл бұрын

LMAO because, up until I read your post I couldn't figure out why Window's inconsistency didn't bother me. Its inconsistency is consistent! 😅

@andrey8688

Жыл бұрын

By the way, Linux is way more consistent in inconsistancy than Windows.

@andreivaughn1468

Жыл бұрын

Yet Windows 7 still has the best UI of any desktop OS including Linux distros past and present, and it's 10+ years old... Microsoft may suck now but they made that once upon a time and somehow nobody could ever top it.

@lawrencedoliveiro9104

Жыл бұрын

Interesting that, when you ask what is the number one people reason people stick with Windows, the answer is “games”. Yet the Steam Deck is having a lot of success running a Linux distro with a purpose-built UI. While Microsoft is struggling, and failing, to adapt its unwieldy Windows UI to that same form factor.

@lawrencedoliveiro9104

Жыл бұрын

@@alexanderhaggman4173 “personal pc” ... I like that. Sort of a “ppc”, then?

As someone who chafed really hard under the concept of a full screen start menu in windows 8, gnome is like home these days. Turns out it wasn't the concept that was bad, it was Window's implementation of it.

@TheLinuxEXP

Жыл бұрын

Yep!

@sleepymarauder4178

Жыл бұрын

I really disliked Gnome's UI when I first used it. However it is bloody perfect when used properly. On my laptop I run KDE but my MS Surface runs Gnome. And it works like a charm.

@cejannuzi

11 ай бұрын

Yes, Win 8 was just bad bad bad.

@stephblackcat

11 ай бұрын

Can I ask you how you got used to your youtube getting covered when you want to open a notepad, or having to move your mouse much further to click icons, or how you deal with the partition effect (that thing where when you walk into a different room your brain forgets what you were doing because it designated that as a task for the previous room) cause yeah that's a thing on computers too. just unfullscreening a youtube video can trigger it.

@arthurnorth3178

11 ай бұрын

@@stephblackcat As someone with ADHD which exacerbates that effect, it hasn't bothered me much. I already used the super key for launching the start menu and typing in the name of what I was looking for. I know they have icons and the like, but for my workflow I basically never interact with them. The overview and it's list of icons is basically just a spot I look at if I want to know, roughly, what's installed on my computer and something I reference if I don't remember the name of what I'm looking for and it didn't pop up for me. I think this may highlight the real issue. If you're a more graphically oriented used, preferring icons and shortcuts as your primary method of launching programs, then the gnome interface may not be for you because it does have those issues if you're sensitive to them.

There absolutely _is_ a reason to have your app menu occupy a small section of your screen instead of filling the entire screen. That reason is to prevent the user from losing the context of what they're working on when looking for the next app they need to open. It's essentially the same as the "walking through a doorway effect", where you walk into a room and forget why, because the complete change of context wipes your short-term memory clean. Microsoft tried the full-screen app menu paradigm in Windows 8 and it was a complete failure. Almost everyone hated it, and this is the reason why. That being said, I absolutely agree the design of the new Windows 11 app menu is terrible and I hate it. Show me ALL my apps dammit!

@nawantabahpangestu1973

Жыл бұрын

The failure of Windows 8's Start Screen lies in its design. When users open the Start Screen, they expect to see a grid list of installed apps. However, this is not the case with Windows 8's Start Screen. Instead, it is filled with "garbage" widget tiles that simply do not work as expected, even on Windows 10. Look at the macOS's Launchpad, that is how start screen supposed to be.

@stevedixon921

Жыл бұрын

I did not like the Windows 8 Start screen, but not for the reason you suggest (not invalidating it either). I hated it because it seemingly never had what *I* needed in the list of programs. I nearly always had to 'search' for what I wanted (and could a simple program search be fast...heck no). And heavens forbid if I did not know exactly what I was looking for and needed to 'rummage' through the installed programs to find the tool for managing some obscure database engine or third party app. Sheer frustration. At least with the classic start menu I could rummage through the program list to discover what was actually installed. I also find the Windows 11 Start menu tedious to use as everything seems to move around of its own accord again and again and again. Windows has lowered my expectations so far that I can't recognize better when I see it.

@deusexaethera

11 ай бұрын

@@nawantabahpangestu1973 : The Windows 8 fullscreen start menu had many problems, but being fullscreen was the biggest one, pun not intended. Even if it had been a simple grid of icons, it still would've been counterproductive to cover the user's entire workspace. (source: I'm a software engineer and I specialize in algorithms and UI design.)

@mactep1

11 ай бұрын

@@deusexaethera Yeah, win10 start is basically just win8´s but not full-screen, and (at lest to me)that's the best start menu ms ever made, resizable(in both X and Y) and super customizable, with lots of organizational features.

@legionofanon

11 ай бұрын

I want them to bring back the entirety of the Win 7 UX with the current list of app features. the dumbing down and burying user CONTROLS is annoying af. also the forced updates drives me nuts

The reason most OSs use a traditional start menu in the corner is that the corner is the fastest spot to accurately move the cursor to, and once the menu is open, you want things as close to the cursor as possible, in order to reduce how much it has to move to reach items. It is not simply because people are used to it.

@TheLinuxEXP

Жыл бұрын

That doesn’t work though, because while aiming for the corner is easier, you still have to move your eyes or entire head to look at the menu, and then aim carefully for categories or small icons. The corner is fine, the menu isn’t!

@grgmn

Жыл бұрын

This is why the Ubuntu shell puts the most commonly used buttons in their own corners. It's actually a smart bit of design honestly.

@JodyBruchon

Жыл бұрын

@@TheLinuxEXP I don't have to move my eyes much to scan colorful icons in alphabetical order for the one I want. When you allow reordering and throw everything into a grid it becomes MORE difficult to target those icons. Additionally, grouping those icons into a single icon "subfolder" exponentially makes the problem worse.

@Michael-Archonaeus

Жыл бұрын

@@TheLinuxEXP So it's too hard to move your eyes to one corner of the screen, but it's not too hard to move your eyes back and forth across the entire screen, to scan a full screen app launcher? I'm not so sure I can agree with that.

@Yoshi-vq3og

Жыл бұрын

​@@TheLinuxEXP but the thing is, I don't really want to see it. I just want a small thing to quickly search for the program and press enter, while still being able to see the rest of what I'm doing. (for example watching a video or something) For me a small menu like this is perfect. Small and unobstrusive.

I am a retired mainframe programmer/analyst. Using Linux since 1995. I have used many OSes over the years and had to adapt to a new UI/UX more times that I care to mention. I guess I am so hardened that it matters not to me at this point. I just adapt and keep on truckin'. Nicely presented, however.

@gunaodegaia9082

Жыл бұрын

what was your favourite one to use, out of curiosity?

@jamessmith4229

Жыл бұрын

@@gunaodegaia9082 I would say Linux Mint with Cinnamon DE. I guess I find it suits my workflow best. Yours?

@cameronbosch1213

Жыл бұрын

​@James Smith Mine would be Arch with KDE Plasma. I like getting regular updates and new hardware (point releases likely have older kernels, which means newer hardware might not work with them), and I also like how KDE is customizable. And of course, it has Wayland support on my Nvidia laptop! (Even if Wayland doesn't work on my desktop, it clearly is the future of desktop Linux.)

@jamessmith4229

Жыл бұрын

@@cameronbosch1213 my hardware is old, stable, and since I do not game, a stable release works fine for this old timer. I still code in COBOL!

@cameronbosch1213

Жыл бұрын

@@jamessmith4229 That's great for you. Quite the opposite of me. I don't even know COBOL! 😬

The reason a small menu makes more sense is that if you open it with your cursor, it will be closer to your cursor/finger, and you can traverse more options in less space than if they were larger. (though the items need to be large enough to comfortably click)

It's amazing how GNOME users think it's much more efficient to have a crapload of icons covering your screen almost entirely and then scrolling through pages and pages of icons looking to find the one icon you want, instead of having a taskbar on the side or bottom of the screen with a few icons that you use more often. and launch the programs you need more quickly and, yes, more than one at a time. I don't doubt that windows has it's problems, bu GNOME is not necessarily the answer.

New Linux user here coming from Windows just starting a few weeks ago. Very good breakdown of some of the habits that we former windows folks have. Especially true about downloading content. One of the reasons I always downloaded from the official site was for the assurance that I’m getting the correct file. When I see some packages in Linux for the same thing with slightly different names/sources, it sends alarm bells to my brain that some could be imposter apps trying to Trojan onto my system. Likely not the case in Linux for most apps, but it’s a real concern coming from windows and a hard habit to break.

@temari2860

Жыл бұрын

When I started with Linux 5 years ago - I broke my system first time because I tried putting a downloaded AppImage into a /bin directory. I couldn't do that ofc because of permissions, so I set all folders in root directory to be owned by my user instead of root. After that I couldn't log into my user account anymore.

@pialdas6835

Жыл бұрын

The funny thing is through social engineering, malicious users can put up phishing sites. We already see this as ads on the Google search pages. It took a while for me to get used to as well after leaving Windows but now I cannot just go back. App stores/package managers are objectively better since it's so much faster and easier. After all, Android and iOS users mostly use the app stores to download their applications so it's not all too foreign to use an app store on a desktop if you use a smartphone

@sergeykish

Жыл бұрын

I completely trust distribution packages. User provided packages like AUR should be checked though I have not seen malware yet. And I've always felt uneasy about Ubuntu PPA - Launchpad as build service is a great idea but I don't know how to check recipe.

@jonnyso1

Жыл бұрын

Boi am I having a terrible time checking if every website I download something is legit !

@Sasha-zw9ss

Жыл бұрын

@@pialdas6835 AND I can't imagine manually updating each app instead of using package manager.

The problem os not that we can not stray to far from Windows. I converted a company from win to Gnome last year and they just sat down and started to work. No problem at all. 5min basic "how to" was all it took. I think the problem comes before any contact with a gui. The problem is to make the decision to throw yourself out of your "safe" Windows environment to something unknown.

@TheLinuxEXP

Жыл бұрын

I agree on that. Making a move that will throw you out of your comfort zone is hard!

@My-noname

Жыл бұрын

@@TheLinuxEXP thing is that Windows is a mess but the store made the decision for you. Much easier!

The Start menu from the Windows XP and older days was pretty great. There are very good reasons to have the menu small and in the corner. I don't want everything else I've got open to be obscured by a huge menu. Just because I'm not actively working on something doesn't mean that I'm not watching it. If I have a transfer ongoing then I might abort my menu searching to bump that along. The combination of the cascading menu and pinning at the bottom is the best paradigm I've seen to date. GNOME's launcher is inferior for the same reasons Windows 8 Start was inferior..

@penntaylor695

Жыл бұрын

If you're having to abort your menu searches in order to complete some other task, that sounds like a major problem with the layout of the menu, the organization of the data in the menu, or the number of steps you have to take to find and start an application. The size, position, or visual opacity of the menu is not the underlying problem. I use Gnome 3.36, and the menu is rarely displayed on my screen for more than 2 seconds. When I need to start an application, I press the Super key and start typing either the name of the program or some related keyword such as "audio" (which filters the list of displayed app icons down to those that are tagged as having something to do with audio). There are rarely more than 5 choices at that point, so it's quick and easy to choose one and move on.

@JodyBruchon

Жыл бұрын

@@penntaylor695 No, it's not remotely a problem with the layout of the menu. If I'm looking through the contents of the menu to make a decision about what to use in it then I'd be looking around regardless of the layout. The most organized menu in the world can't decide on a program for me. If I know what I want then I can hit Windows+R and type it directly or hit the Windows key and type the first 2-4 characters of the program name or click on it in the pile of pinned tiles or (most likely) click the pinned icon on the taskbar and not use a menu at all.

@Dee-Ell

Жыл бұрын

Give me an example of what you need to be visible at all times on screen while you look for the app in the Start Menu. To me, that's probably like 0.01% of use cases.

@jacobzhong3971

Жыл бұрын

Exactly, can't agree more

@JodyBruchon

Жыл бұрын

@@Dee-Ell Tell me why my application launcher needs to be full screen in the first place. I shouldn't have to justify everything I can see NOT being obscured by clicking on the launcher of choice in the OS/DE. Completely hiding the screen interrupts workflow. What does any full-screen launcher give me that justifies breaching workflow? In other words, why would I CHOOSE Windows 8?

Time will tell but I think people leaving Windows will figure things out that work best for themselves. We as a community need to be there to help them make the change. Change is always hard but we can adapt.

Options over decisions. A good UX has a thoughtful design with consistency and clarity, but it also has options to let users customize things to their preferences and needs. Its a factor of accessibility as well. Being able to customize the under interface may make someone with limited means able to use a device they couldn’t otherwise.

@TheLinuxEXP

Жыл бұрын

Yeah, that’s why KDE is probably the best DE out there

@themadoneplays7842

Жыл бұрын

@@TheLinuxEXP And yet you spend a lot of time fanboying Gnome shell because of its full screen app launcher and how it's forcing that ugly ass adwaita theme that only offers two versions, dark mode and light mode with blue highlights with no option to change the colors outside using other themes. Meanwhile, KDE remains extremely customizable even if you stick to breeze. You can even GASP change what colors you want things to be!

@pulkitkrishna8809

Жыл бұрын

@@themadoneplays7842 Accent colors are coming to GNOME too.

@themadoneplays7842

Жыл бұрын

@@pulkitkrishna8809 I heard, but they are not there now.

@asutoshvariar

Жыл бұрын

Not exactly true. Gradience allows for full customization, even using custom CSS at times.

I like the small "start menu" because I want to see what's behind it. If I'm streaming, using the menu can free my mouse from the game

@thingsiplay

Жыл бұрын

I'm not sure what yo mean by you "want to see what's behind it". For the mouse freeing stuff, you could also use virtual desktops (even with a single monitor) to run games on a different desktop and switch between them. Or in some environments its called "Workspaces" or "Groups".

@MatthewWilliamsX

Жыл бұрын

A favourites page with all apps listed by category is **still** much easier than the Redmond alternative. Whether it be Gnome, KDE, or a tilers dream - categories are a real win.

@RogueRen

Жыл бұрын

@@MatthewWilliamsX oh 100%

@iXenox

Жыл бұрын

​@@thingsiplaywhen you want the game fullscreened but you need to do something in the background activating the menu results in a visible cursor. It essentially makes the game windowed on a hotkey without reducing resolution.

@thingsiplay

Жыл бұрын

@@iXenox I guess it turns the focused fullscreen game window into a kinda sort of preview window. I can imagine how it might work. Is this a Windows thing? I personally just switch the virtual desktop and leave the game in fullscreen on another. In example in online games when waiting for the match to begin (or find something), I switch to a different virtual desktop and read something in Firefox while waiting.

I think having programs in their own folders is great for portability as transferring apps to an external storage is simple.

@dv5809

4 ай бұрын

which you can't do anyway because they won't work anymore 😂 MacOS handles it the best way

I actually prefer that the program is at the same folder with the library files because 1. You'll know what libraries the program is using, 2. You can easily delete them since they live in a single folder, 3. Finding the program + files is simpler.

@mrgm148

Жыл бұрын

Snap or flatpak

@tramadol42

Жыл бұрын

@@mrgm148 Yeah right, as if they would work correctly out of the box in most distros, or would be configured correctly....

@hartmutholzgraefe

Жыл бұрын

1.) "ldd" will tell you what libraries a binary was linked against. Package dependencies tell you what it needs. And good look fixing a library vulnerability issues when having multiple copies of the same library all over the place (multiple versions of the same shared library in /usr/lib on the other hand is perfectly possible, though seldom taken care of by package managers) 2.) "apt-get uninstall" or "apt-get prune" if you even want customized global files be gone (or the yum/dnf/zypper eqivalents for RPM based distributions) 3.) that's a matter of habit, "all binaries are in /usr/bin, all libraries in /us/lib, all support files under /usr/share, all global config under /etc, all globaly managed data is in /var/lib, user config is in a hidden file or directory under $HOME (old style), or under $HOME/.config (new style)" for pretty much *every* package, with the exception of those 3rd party packages installing themselves in the /opt hierarchy, is easier in the long run IMHO

@ytbone9430

11 ай бұрын

@@hartmutholzgraefe I think applications being "installed", meaning spread all over the filesystem is an outdated concept. It is for me at least, because I don't want to spend time installing an application and doing all the configuration work again and again on each install of linux / windows, whatever. I tend to pick apps by "being portable" or once installed, they can move around and be started from anywhere (local disk, usb-drive, another computer etc.). This is how I want the future to look. Install the OS of your choice, copy your existing application folders back in place and be ready to start working on things. It can takes several days to setup and configure all the programs before I can start working. I want to upgrade/switch hardware more easily, so this really needs to stop! o) There are many applications (on windows) already which don't need "install", could be even more. I don't find flatpaks and things on linux very appealing, since application files are hard to access in a "blob", configurations need to be managed externally and the 32bit vs 64bit issue is present as well. In general, I find things to be quite cumbersome on current operating systems. Nothing got more easy over the last 30 years.. this is my impression at least. o)

@mina86

11 ай бұрын

Why do you care what libraries the application is using? And if you really care, ldd is a better way to find that out. With package manager, deleting the whole program is not an issue.

You're actually quite right about new Linux users. However, I will honestly admit that I switched from Win 10 to Linux Mint in February this year because I was irritated by updates and the general sluggishness of the Windows system. Now, when I see opinions about Win 11, I think that switching to Linux Mint was one of the best decisions in my life, especially that I just fell in love with cinammon, I think that I will use this system for a long time. :)

@alejandroschnettler1794

Жыл бұрын

I passed for the same process almost a year ago, still learning, but I still love this.

@user-cv9pg8lo4j

Жыл бұрын

I haven't understood how to use Linux Mint enough. I'm used to using Windows, so if I install apps by commands on Linux Mint, I don't know where the apps were installed and how to uninstall them.

@andrey8688

Жыл бұрын

@@user-cv9pg8lo4j The same. I don't remember whether I installed an app from source, AppImage, deb or anything else, and it annoys.

@TheRandomGuyTheFarNoGameCat

Жыл бұрын

Moved to Linux Mint 3 years ago, I'll never ever go back to Windows.

@user-cv9pg8lo4j

Жыл бұрын

@@TheRandomGuyTheFarNoGameCat I'll build a desktop computer and install Linux Mint later on, I only used Linux Mint on my old laptop so far, the hardware isn't good enough for what I want to do. I'll learn more about Linux Mint after I build the computer desktop, it needs to make an effort to learn, and once I'm familiar with Linux Mint, I can ditch Windows. How long did you spend learning Linux Mint?

I think you went a little hard into the start menu, and it's more of a preference thing. That said, window managers with basic run prompts are far better in my experience.

@TheLinuxEXP

Жыл бұрын

Of course, as I said, UX can be subjective

@fulconandroadcone9488

Жыл бұрын

You can't go hard enough on them removing do not combine option from task bar. They want to turn windows into a mac, they fail with ui and shell.

@sebastianestrada1311

Жыл бұрын

Is subjective

@VictorRodriguez-zp2do

Жыл бұрын

I do agree with that though. If I'm opening the menu is because I want to open something quickly so I don't need to see all the other stuff. I don't just keep the start menu open for fun

@dxplosiv1

Жыл бұрын

Been experimenting with AwesomeWM for a couple weeks. I must say, it does improve workflow more than I thought it would. So easy to whip around the system once you get used to the hotkeys. It does assume you know the names of your programs though.

Several of the things you went after Windows for have been solved a long time ago. User data and programs have been forcibly isolated since Vista came out around 2006. You can't store user data in program folders. There are two places that per-user program data are stored: in your user profile under AppData and then Local or Roaming. The split exists because Windows in a server environment supports "roaming profiles" where Roaming is stuff that should follow your *login* anywhere on the network while Local is stuff that should only be on the local computer such as browser caches. In an organization where your account's profile is a roaming profile, you can log into any machine where you are permitted to do so and all of your stuff follows you because it's actually stored server-side. Of course this is pointless for the vast majority of smaller businesses and residential users, but that doesn't make it a bad thing. The setup, update, and upgrade processes have improved massively in recent years as well. I think you may not understand these aspects Windows enough to properly criticize them. I applaud you for admitting your biases upfront. I'm just annoyed that my most popular production is "Windows 11 Must Be Stopped" yet here I am defending Windows. Excuse me while I shower.

@warlock415

Жыл бұрын

My favorite thing is the Virtualstore compatibility layer that they shimmed in. If a legacy program "Foostuff" tries to write to C:\Program Files\Foostuff, Windows will pretend to accept it but actually place it under the local user's Appdata where it "should be". Of course, this fails in the case of multi-user, but what can ya do...

@JodyBruchon

Жыл бұрын

@@warlock415 That was put in place to make old software that violates the new strict security model not break completely. The vast majority of software never touches VirtualStore anymore.

@joejoesoft

Жыл бұрын

The ability to copy a program to a thumbdrive and run it from there or copy it to a new system is a massive convenience. This requires that everything be installed in a single location and is not the norm for any OS that I've ever used (save most MS-DOS programs). I've no idea why the video presents single-folder installs as a Windows method. Even Win3.X would scatter program install files all about the OS. The VirtualStore (Program Files protection) can cause just as many issues as it solves for legacy/portable programs. When a user decides to run a program as Admin, it can start writing its data to the the Program Files folder. On subsequent runs without admin, it reads data from Program Files and Windows redirects writes to VirtualStore - effectively erasing any an old stored data from this point forward.

@JodyBruchon

Жыл бұрын

@@joejoesoft There is no doubt that VirtualStore can cause problems, but *it exists to solve a far worse problem: most XP software would completely break under the new Vista security model.* That would have made Vista (and 7, 8, and so on) a total deal-breaker for everyone. There had to be some way to run those "Windows 3.1 scattered files everywhere" on a more strict security model and VirtualStore is what they did to solve that problem. Single-folder installs are handy for some types of software, but they also completely prevent code library reuse (both on-disk and in-memory), adding bloat and ongoing security issues. The equivalent of a single-folder install on Linux would be Flatpak, Snap, or AppImage, and all of those are terrible for the reasons outlined above. The *only* advantage of a single-folder install is portability.

@joejoesoft

Жыл бұрын

@@JodyBruchon I agree with most of that. However, a stand-alone EXE (like those created by Delphi) uses the system libraries on a standard Windows install. So, you get the memory paging benefits and the security updates provided by the OS. This, however, is more exception than the rule. Most Windows frameworks require an installer. You have to go out of your way to create a standalone EXE in most languages for Windows or use a lesser known language like Delphi.

Hmm. Mixed bag, IMHO. Probably because I'm a software engineer, my ideas about usability are slightly skewed. Great video, but my views are a little different. I use all three major OS's (Windoze, Mac OS, and Linux) daily, so my comparisons are continuously updating. For me, the start menu makes sense (when it's on the left, always in the same place), along with the ability to tap the Windows key, type the first few letters of the program I'm looking for, and then hit Enter to launch. Pretty simple. On Mac, it's Windows+Space bar (I use Mac with a Windows keyboard) to get a middle-of-the-screen launcher. Before Windows adopted the quick keyboard method of launching from the Start Menu (and many Linux distros as well), I used to use Launchy or something similar, which mimics the current Mac quick-launch method. I don't like the Gnome way of doing things, though I'm sure many do. To each their own. In terms of app installation, I frankly don't like ANY of them. They all pretty much suck. Yes, app stores/repos are great, _as long as they have the app you want._ If not, it's the Wild West. Flatpak? Snap? AppImage? Deb? RPM? Source? You either have to keep multiple package managers (which can totally mess each other up), or go with something like the AUR on an Arch-based system (which is what I do). And I DO like the concept of the single-folder install, where all the dependencies are in one place. If I want to configure an app, I can just look in its folder. No scrolling through a zillion config files. AppImages are the next best thing, although there is more work (making them executable, getting them on your menu). One thing I absolutely _HATE_ and which has not (so far) infected Linux or Mac, is the Windows Registry. Dear God! Whose idea was that? We need to bring back cruel and unusual punishment just for that person - and maybe the idiot who invented COM, while we're at it!

@Shadowofthedark847

2 ай бұрын

What would you do if two apps required the same library ? Have them duplicated into their separated folders wasting space and cluttering shit or having symlinks for those libraries in that folder whilst the original one copy remains somewhere else organised ? But having symlinks means ONE change to any shortcuts (which point to one single library) means applying change to all apps which may work well for the respective application that the change was made for but might break others . Also , different developers might use a different heirarchy for their applications , cluttering everything like Windows. If they go down the route to have single directories for programs then a good solution would be to standardize directory structure for all applications as a requirement to develop for linux and have the ONLY libraries which are explicitly required by ONLY one application being included in that applications directory , while the system-wide used libraries could remain as they are now . One big downside would be that this "migration" of directory structures would be a huge slowdown in linux development and would cause headaches for the developers who ALREADY have their applications follow the current structure . Although this would make it easier for users , the downsides make it just not-so worth it. Another solution could be to keep applications along with their libraries as they currently are and make a separate single folder like windows having symlinks to all of the explicity application-specific libraries which are ONLY used by that specific application and none other while again the system wide libraries remain in their respective folders as they currently are.

Interesting how you didn’t highlight the application *categories* on Linux, probably because Gnome doesn’t have them anymore. ;) Plasma’s start menu does have a pin feature what makes it sticky to launch multiple programs, btw. It’s also size-adjustable and the mouse distances are way shorter than on Gnome’s full screen view.

@kbhasi

Жыл бұрын

Yep, I think it's because of GNOME. Plasma still has that, as well as MATE and a few other environments, while on Windows, lots of app installer frameworks create folders and put shortcuts into them as a lazy holdover from Windows 3.x, but also if they were suites that created multiple shortcuts. I do honestly like the idea of having different categories and a favourites section, or maybe I'm just too accustomed to Plasma.

@pialdas6835

Жыл бұрын

I think Gnome does have it, just not in their app launcher. You can use Gnome Extensions to enable launching apps from the top edge of the screen kinda like I believe Xfce. The apps are categorized by default

@kbhasi

Жыл бұрын

@@pialdas6835 Ah, I forgot about that. I did see an extension like that in some distro's modified GNOME setup, though, but forgot about that until your reply reminded me.

@winlux2

Жыл бұрын

@@pialdas6835 That’s a broad definition of "Gnome does have it". The programs just provide a category manifest but the official shell doesn’t do anything with this information.

@pialdas6835

Жыл бұрын

@winlux2 oh then what does the shell use to create those categories? Is it just an extension that Gnome provides but not native to the shell? I remember using that category feature on Fedora before I switched to their KDE spin

13:10 This made me laugh way more than it should have 😂 Yesterday I went through an update on Arch that left my ENTIRE main computer unusable. After 1 year and a half of running only Arch, today I officially switched to Fedora 🎉

I switched quite a few friends to Linux (Fedora with Gnome) and I tell them to treat it like their phone. Use it the same way you would use your phone and you will be fine. Now they are happy Linux users.

@bionic-beaver

Жыл бұрын

That's a incredible proof that GNOME doesn't fit on desktops. Feels so unnatural to use a supposedly *Desktop Environment like a Phone UI.

@rikuleinonen

Жыл бұрын

@@bionic-beaver I don't think making the interface less janky means it doesn't fit on a desktop. Since when was jank a requirement for something to work as a desktop environment?

Strongly disagree on the start menu. I don't want anything to open full screen by default. I want multi tasking with all the apps simultaneously visible including while using the start menu.

@TheLinuxEXP

Жыл бұрын

You can do that with a launcher like spotlight or krunner. Works better than a menu, and isn’t fullscreen

Personally I do actually prefer the start menu as is in KDE. I do need it not occupying the entire screen, because i can immediately forget what I was looking for if the visual contact with what I am doing at the moment is broken. It literally takes like 50ms sometimes. Id say it's 50/50 for me in mouse and keyboard based searches. I type as often as I navigate the categories.

@sudormrf

Жыл бұрын

same. using kde rn

@purpledragon

Жыл бұрын

Yep much prefer the win7/kde plasma start menu.

@VallThyo

Жыл бұрын

exactly

@k4everut

Жыл бұрын

I use KDE Plasma and I prefer its default start menu over GNOME's because Plasma's menu is reliable and unobtrusive. However, KDE Plasma gives you the ability to switch menu layouts, and I found a full screen, touch friendly menu called Plasma Drawer that's also more reliable than GNOME's menu and also unobtrusive. Nick lost me on the whole menu thing!

@TheSimoc

Жыл бұрын

Good point, while I equally appreciate the point in the video about Start Menu. Both are way overlooked points. First of all, about the very context of launchers, I generally lean towards The Linux Experiment's point and thanks to him for finally calling out the issue after almost three decades of suffering - I have always preferred the Program Manager we had up to Windows 3.11, and the change into Start Menu concept since 95 has mostly been pissing me off. But, you are very right on the importance of retaining visual contact to view you are working on, and while I personally don't find it as much of issue with launcher operation (I see it may be for other people and even for me in some specific situations), and specifically it is not overlooked in the designs (as the Start Menu concept is the very prevailing one), *but* it is really overlooked in many other contexts. For example, more and more dialogs have been replaced with full-screen (or full-window) views, which is really, totally pissing me off, for several reasons. One reason is exactly what you mentioned, forgetting what you were doing/looking for when the visual contact has been interrupted. Second reason is, that often the change in the dialog would affect the viewed content and you would like to see the change in real time. Third and often the most pissing off reason is, that when you are using software that you are not completely familiar with, especially if it is of a kind with several working modes with corresponding entire views, then all the functions we have used to open in dialogs, such as "settings", "properties", "add object", "edit object", etc. opening in full-screen (or full window) makes you "feel lost", as without being completely familiar with the specific software, you cannot intuitively know in which working mode you are / into which you got "jumped", and how you can go back and in which you even should go. Dialogs instead are extremely intuitive on that, as they just come on top of the view so you can "rest assured" you are still in the same view, and you can return into it by simply closing the dialog. Generally, user friendliness used to be the thing, the design paradigm was that programs should be made easy and intuitive to use without any kind of familiarization with a specific program. Nowadays, along with horrible bloat and other unprofessionality prevailing in the software industry, we have made giant leaps backwards in that during the post-Windows XP era.

The thing that's nice about the traditional smart menu paradigm is the fact you can still see what's on the screen. As someone who is easily distracted things going full-screen without being able to reference what I was already doing is kinda lame. Generally I just search for programs or use keyboard shortcuts for my computing this day and age but the off chance I need to look for something I want to be able to reference what's already open without closing the menu.

My biggest hurdle learning Linux is the Linux user community. If I run into an issue trying to do something in Linux, and I reach out to the people who appear to be knowledgeable of what I am trying to accomplish, I typically receive a verbal beat down and no help whatsoever. The only thing I am more sick of than reading documentation is being told by Linux users to read the documentation. I find it annoying when I have a question and I search for the answer, all I can find are forum posts where people who have asked the same question and were told if they want to know, they should go read and find out the answer for themselves. I’m not a full time Linux Admin. My interaction with Linux is limited, so I’m usually just trying to accomplish some very specific task and it may be a year before I see another Linux machine. I may not want or have time to study the complete RHCE courseware to find out a command line switch.

Every Gnome user at this point has at least once moved their cursor to the top left in Windows and was truly disappointed by nothing happening. Then he/she promptly presses Alt+Tab/Start to mimic a fraction of Gnome's power.

@JuanCAraujoS

Жыл бұрын

I became so used to keyboard shortcuts in Gnome that I'm frustrated when I use Windows or MacOS and try to switch workspace.

@CybernerdShua

Жыл бұрын

Honestly, mate, instead of using "he/she", just use "they". It's comprised of fewer letters and is easier to read.

@onred_

Жыл бұрын

I actually don’t like the hot corner because I have two monitors, with the primary being in the center and the secondary being on the left, so my cursor just flies off to the secondary monitor. I got and extension for making the bottom center of the screen a hot zone, but I don’t actually use it so much, and have accidentally triggered it a few times… It’s mostly the super key life for me

@cameronbosch1213

Жыл бұрын

GNOME is a very different way of working on your computer, which doesn't work well for me, so I don't use it. Not saying it's bad though, just not for me.

@knoopx

Жыл бұрын

hot corners are bad, the mouse travel distance is too far. the hot edge extension is 1000% times better.

Finally switched to Linux after using Windows all my life :) And your channel has been great at convincing me to do so :D I use Fedora with Gnome, and I love it!

@stephencoakley

Жыл бұрын

I finally switched to Linux after using Windows for over a decade, then ran Linux for many years, then used Windows 10 for a couple years, then now just recently switched back to Linux. :)

@hollow_dystopia

Жыл бұрын

I'm still using Windows 11 for program compatibility, but I use Mint on my previous Windows 10 PC and I am absolutely amazed on how fast it is compared to Windows 10. Been daily driving it for a while now I love it.

@elmariachi5133

Жыл бұрын

Welcome, and thanks for being a responsible and conscious person not falling for the Apple trap!

4:20 You actually can make folders for organization! I daily drive Windows 11 for work and gaming, and one of the main things I like about the new start menu is how much cleaner the folders are. You just drag one pinned app over another pinned app to put them in a folder together. It's cleaner and less buggy than the Windows 10 "tiles" system 🙂 That being said, I'm typing this from inside a Linux VM, lol. I do really love the Gnome desktop experience as well.

Never has Windows Update bricked my system. Can't say the same with some Linux distros.

I started with GNU/Linux years ago, my last machine with windows had win 8. No matter of OS, switching to another will always require some adaptation. I was beginner too, and everyone should know that everybody faced that discomfort of change. I wish you all grit! Don't give up, even if you hear M$ voice calling you in the middle of the night!

I'm fine with using a start menu. Gnome's application menu, Windows 8's Start Screen , and macOS' Launchpad all go to a full screen leaving me to have to search the whole screen to find an app that I may have just installed. The start menu may not be perfect but I would prefer having a smaller, concise window that doesn't need me to look at the entire screen. I understand Libadwaita being used to unify the design of Gnome but I like customizing my UI. Libawaita is so limited out of the box that even Windows has better customization (At least I can change the accent color). Gnome isn't a bad DE, it's just not for me That being said, I have my commonly used programs mapped to a keyboard shortcut and I use the search bar in the start menu to find what isn't mapped, or KRunner when I use KDE to just type on the desktop. I also use Plank Dock

I hadn’t considered the start menu being so inefficient. In fact, I personally hated the MacOS App drawer thingy, and just made a shortcut to the App folder on my dock so that it would pop up just like the start menu does. The way gnome does it impressed me. A single menu that lets you open multiple apps at once AND lets you place them in their respective virtual desktops? Bro that’s amazing!!! Now ama be honest, I feel like I would rather just have access to all 3 methods. I’m not one to restrict myself to one method or platform. Linux, MacOS, iOS, Android, Windows, whatever. I like using them all. Same with desktops. I recently learned about tiling managers rather than a floating UI thing like is most common now. And ngl, I wish I could change between terminal-only, tiling and floating desktop on a whim. I like having the option to do so.

One thing about the "you're not gonna do anything else with your screen or your computer while you try to open an app", I don't use the start menu just to open apps. I use krunner, which has lots of helpful tools like a calculator, unit/currency converter, command line, spell checker, dictionary, translator, and more, which often require me to look at something else while I do it. For example, if I'm in a foreign website and want to convert their prices to my currency, it's annoying to have to keep going back and forth and keep having to remember the data i want to convert, and it's really nice to just have it there. Yeah, I know there's copy/paste but I can't always do that if the data is in an image or a video or something, and it's still annoying to have to keep going back and forth. It's just so much nicer to have it as a small panel in the corner of my screen that doesn't get in the way instead of having my entire desktop shrink and bring up a search bar that covers the entire screen and without anything to keep it from going away the moment I click anything else. As for opening multiple apps, at least in KDE, you can pin the start menu, open the apps, then unpin it. This is also useful for keeping open stuff up like calculations, conversions, and other stuff I mentioned above. Maybe it could be better if you could, say, keep it open by Shift clicking, but that's still nothing inherent to the start menu, just a flaw in it's current implementation, and if that's your problem with it, just what the current implementation happens to be, fair enough. But it's definitely not inherent to the Start Menu.

I used to work with someone who INSISTED on pasting screenshots into a Word document, and then sending that entire document instead of just simply sending the screenshot because it was easier for her. Linux in a lot of aspects is much simpler and more efficient to use than Windows, people just don't care because they're not used to it.

@OctoFloofy

Жыл бұрын

its not even needed that way on windows, windows has a keyboard shortcut for selecting what you want to screenshot or another simple button press for screenshotting the entire screen. After that you can just paste the screenshot whereever.

@monochrome_linux

Жыл бұрын

screenshots in a word document shit is thanks to windows not having a decent screenshot tool, idk about win11 but in windows 10, you have to either use the snipping tool program which is a half decent program but no shortcuts to open it, making it annoying to use or the built in super shift s shortcut which lets you take a screenshot that thing wont save your screenshot anywhere but your cliipboard and now you have to open something like paint or something, paste the screenshot there and save. its soo fucking stupid, idk how the developers cant even add a simple ass thing as proper screenshot support, how stupid are they? gnome is sooo sooo SOOOO better, printscreen shortcut lets you take a screenshot of your liking, and it autosaves the screenshots in Pictures/Screenshots and also copies the screenshot to clipboard.

@OctoFloofy

Жыл бұрын

@@monochrome_linux yeah you right about the saving part. I use sharex anyways which has way more features. I don't know how screenshots really are on Linux. I only tried mint once but nothing in-depth. Only used it for a couple of hours to try things out.

@trailblazercombi

Жыл бұрын

​@@monochrome_linux Yup, they fixed most of that in Win 11 There is an option to screenshot with Snip & Sketch by pressing PrintScreen now and every screenshot gets automatically saved into Pictures\Screenshots, plus your clipboard

@takix2007

Ай бұрын

​@@monochrome_linuxon the other hand, on Gnome IIRC if you just want to screenshot + paste somewhere (a document for example if you are writing a tuto of some sort), you have to click somewhere in the screenshot app again to copy to clipboard...

In Windows 10, I don't start things from the start menu at all. 14/20 times what I need is one of 4 applications I've pinned on the task bar, 5/20 times it's a desktop symbol for all the secondary stuff and the remaining 1/20 times I jump straight to the search.

...but the small start menu does have advantages. What if I wanna see what's behind my desktop. Like, having a video running or a game but just wanting to launch some program without having everything to be hidden/being made smaller.

For menus in both Plasma and Icewm, I just bring up an application menu with a right mouse button click anywhere on the desktop. Icewm (I use it at work on an old computer) facilitates putting preferred applications at the top of the menu for quick access.

Global menus like Rofi are a god sent on WM. I prefer it over any other type of menu. But if I had to choice between the classic start menu and the GNOME/MacOS style app menu, I'll prefer the classic start just because I hate that it has to go to a separate screen, it kinda hurts the eyes and waste microseconds on a transition.

@TheLinuxEXP

Жыл бұрын

Global menus are great, yeah

@CanuckGod

Жыл бұрын

I second this, Rofi is great and I've been using it on all the computers that I've installed Linux Mint on. My main PC still has a few things which necessitate using Windows 11 as my daily driver, but even there, I use Open-Shell (a revival of the Classic Shell code) as a mouse-based launcher, and then for Rofi-like access for Windows, I decided to go with Flow Launcher, which is FOSS and works much like Rofi does for Linux.

@moister3727

Жыл бұрын

@@CanuckGod I also use Classic Shell! Fix everything I need. Altrough tbh I mainly use the taskbar to search for apps. Windows just for games and Linux for everything else so Rofi is my way to go.

I recently switched to a KDE global menu MacOS style environment and I like it much better than the traditional window like environment of having the taskbar and systray in one panel

@TheLinuxEXP

Жыл бұрын

The global menu is so good!

@bigpod

Жыл бұрын

i disagree i find global menus not great

@dalavitang

Жыл бұрын

@@TheLinuxEXP If only it doesn't break DaVinci Resolve keyboard shortcuts!

@slembcke

Жыл бұрын

Not sure how I feel about global menus anymore. I was a Mac user from ~1990 thru ~2018, and I always though per-window menus were a dumb waste of screen space. Today, very few programs I use even have menu bars at all and I don't feel like I'm missing anything. At least in Gnome land, everything turned into better focused, searchable UIs, and a little hamburger menu for the spillover. Maybe it's Stockholm syndrome, but I think I like the new way. hehe Like even VSCode technically has menu bars, but the whole thing UX is based around hotkeys and searching. I can't remember the last time I touched the menu bar.

@fulconandroadcone9488

Жыл бұрын

@@slembcke I like hidden menu bars, when I need them I hit Alt key and they pop up, just like auto hide on task bar, why should it take any space if I'm not using it right now. In the end feels like everything is full screen

There are good UX reasons for the small start menu! One reason is mouse travel. There is a reason why menus generally don't occupy the whole screen, but pop up close to your mouse pointer . Recently, Gnome and Firefox even introduced scrolling to their menus, which makes the menus even smaller and decreases mouse travel. Another reason is legibility. It is hard to read text when the lines are too long, that's why most websites limit the width of the page these days. Similarly, it can make sense to limit the width of a menu to make it easier to overview the items. Probably the most important reason (this might be the main reason why many users are alienated by full screen menus) is orientation. When we use a graphical computer interface, build a spatial model of it in our head. Replacing the screen content with something else requires a lot of work for our brains to reorient. Unless you were about to switch contexts anyway (which you admittedly are quite often when starting a new app), full screen menus actually take more time to use for the reason of reorientation. Windows tried pushing a full screen start menu with Windows 8, but they realised it was a mistake to provide a full screen menu on a desktop device. Nobody uses the full screen menu on KDE, even the KDE devs said that. I'm a Gnome user and a Mac user and I almost never use the Gnome app grid or Launchpad, even though they are the only app menu there. Both of them are just not suited for systems with big screens and systems with pointer based input.

@berkeli383

Жыл бұрын

Windows 10 supported full screen start if you wanted it.

@qj0n

Жыл бұрын

@@berkeli383 win11 has it as well. This is generally a good idea on smaller touch screens. I think it could be even a default setting in Surface and similar devices

@berkeli383

11 ай бұрын

@@qj0n Where's the setting?

@Emily_Bondevik_Official

11 ай бұрын

I use the full screen menu on windows 10 and it's literally fine???

@berkeli383

11 ай бұрын

​@@Emily_Bondevik_Official Yes, but they removed that option in windows 11 :(

I like to have a small application menu, because that means I don't have to look at the whole screen. I can just focus on a small area. Same reason I use small file manager windows instead of fullscreen. I can't focus on 6 columns at once, one or two are plenty, as I scan from top to bottom for the application I want.

about system updates: dist-upgrades on stable systems can easily break (and when they break, they really break) on ubuntu in my limited experience enabling a third-party repo is guarenteed to cause dependency conflicts and prevent your system from booting later down the line

@vinayyadav8149

Жыл бұрын

Linux is much more unstable than windows. Updates break the whole os even if you haven't installed just a single app from the store. I borked my os while trying to install nvidia drivers. No one wants to mess around for 2-3 hours to make their system work. Nobody gives a fuck about how their app looks. People just want a working system and that's what windows provide.

Nobody uses windows that way. They either stack their desktop with icons to open them, or press windows key and search the name of the app to open :)

@TheLinuxEXP

Жыл бұрын

Desktop icons are horrible for this, they’re hidden behind your windows

@freecivweb4160

Ай бұрын

Yeah no one uses windows that way BECAUSE the start menu is such shite. Thanks for proving the point.

I honestly like Gnome's launcher, because i can click the super key once and I got access to the run menu and search for exactly what I need, and super + a to browse all the apps when I want to.

I would disagree about the UX. The reason cinnamon and KDE have such smaller menu is actually a good UX. Suppose you have terminal, IDE, Browser and debugger open in 2 screens. You want to open another terminal - for such a common activity the best way is keyboard shortcut - you do not need to look at the keyboard, you look at the apps, press the shortcut and get another app open without losing focus. For KDE and cinnamon, on meta key you get a small menu taking less than 25% of the screen space, with search automatically focused, so you can type without even looking at the menu, or if you do not know what you want to start, there are categories. Unity and KDE's hot corner (by default) are bad, they move the apps you are using and use the *entire* screen space to give you ability to launch an app. Launching an app is like walking to the toilet - it is activity, but you do not have to think about it, it is not the final goal, you do not need to have your entire attention on it. And PC is not a phone, there is plenty of screen space to work with, you do not have to have a single task taking the entire screen. As you can guess I do not like adwaita minimization of the window decorations. We have plenty of screen space, even when most of the title bar is empty, it is not bad. You have all window functionalities in one click. I do not get why they have to stuff controls into the titlebar. It made perfect sense in early 2000s when our resolution was 800x600 - saving space for more of the app is worth it. But today with 4k resolution, making what was one click or drag functionality of the window decorations to save workspace does not make any sense nowadays. But as you said - UX is subjective - and that's where linux shines. You can choose any starting UX on Xfce4, KDE, Cinnamon, Unity, Gnome, etc, and in a day or so, you can modify it to look how you want it to look, whatever menu and launchers you desire and whatever keyboard shortcut you want. On Windows it is possible, but it will require much more third party tools, more expert knowledge, etc. If you are simple user, you just do not modify the UI, you use whatever MS provides and get used to it. This is the most negative thing I see about windows - users getting used to the defaults and never touching anything they are not sure what it does.

The Metro launcher in Windows 8 was arguably better, more in line with modern launchers like Gnome. But everyone disliked it.

@TheLinuxEXP

Жыл бұрын

Absolutely! It wasn’t amazing but it was better!

@gamtax

Жыл бұрын

Dang, I thought I'm the only one who likes Metro launcher.

i agree with the start menu, even when i used windows 11, i only used powertoys run to run my apps. and yes the inconsistency is jarring and so bad lol. but id argue that sometimes it feels the same on linux with kde and gtk apps...

One good thing about Taskbar is that all the running programs are in it, so switching between apps is easier than in gnome where you have to go to too-left corner and then all the way down to select thd program you want to bring to the top. Windows has an appstore too, you know.

17:56 Counterpoint to this: The times I've tried to install software on linux, more often than not they tell you to build it yourself, which is annoying. As a developer myself, I know how much a PITA downloading and building a project from scratch can be, so I really hate when that's the "recommended" approach. Then as far as options for installing pre-built, I've just found if you're not on ubuntu, and you need a specific version of one of your tools, then you're out of luck. Nearly every instruction assumes ubuntu and in some cases the only package format the devs provide is specific to ubuntu. Inkscape 0.95.2, for example, isn't on the repo for fedora and the only official install the inkscape website gives you is a ppa (for ubuntu). Then you mention adding urls. Well, using online instructions, 99% of the time users will be told to do "echo whateverurl >> /.../some/system/file" then reinitialize their terminal, but the url given is specific to their edition of ubuntu, so if you add the wrong one you can foobar your system, and fixing that and taking it out again is 30minute headache on its own. Then there's the mess of package managers. You have to remember if you've installed something using apt, cmake (for built projects), pip (for python), pip3 (for python3), gem (for ruby), and that's (again) assuming you're on ubuntu.

@takix2007

Ай бұрын

Not trying to be polemic... What niche distro or software asks you to build the software you install from repos - official or not? If it is a third party software (or whatever, you get the idea) that never went through to get their software packaged to any distro, that's on that software's developers. And if your complaint is that every mainstream software is not in every mainstream distro, at least workarounds like the ppa example you highlighted give you semi-decent neat installs. Also, AFAIK, pip and gem are for python/ruby libraries, I fail to see your point... of course it is not going to be on distribution repos and through the software manager. Would that not be like complaining that Fortnite is installed through Steam (and in Steam's directory system...) or that your latest Netflix video cannot be installed through the distro's software managers?! Granted, distro specific answers like "just 'echo arg > /distro/specific/path/' without any context or explanation are a massive pain.

Wow! I haven't previously considered most of the things you discussed. The more I dwell on it, the more I think you have enlightened me. Thanks for that!

I remember watching linus install a font pack, and they looked up some tutorial or smth and drag and dropped it somewhere I was like "OMG JUST DOUBLE CLICK IT its that easy, they think linux is hard, ofcourse its hard when you try to apply complicated windows logic," and I say that as someone who never really used windows for me windows is overcomplicated especially simple stuff like auto login, defaultt browser etc.

@TheLinuxEXP

Жыл бұрын

Yeah, exactly! The default is so much easier on Linux but the terrible practices of Windows makes everything worse for everyone!

@MrProg-ey3tl

20 күн бұрын

Exactly, a large amount of Linus's problems were due to him thinking that Linux is harder than it actually is.

For the windows menu issue, I just pinned all most used apps on the taskbar(Wind)/dock(Mac). And though I moved to Mac for years, I still not master the Mac app launcher + desktop, but seeing how fast he is doing, I properly will start looking into it. And regarding other issues, seriously, all OSs have their own set of "issues". But as a user, I just learn(accept🤦‍♂️).

When WIndows 8 introduced the full screen laucher, most people hated it. I personally hated it because it took a few seconds to open up and show useless stuff, then I started looking for the app I needed. Then when I clicked it, it took a couple seconds for the launcher to refresh to the desktop, then it started the app flash screen. It was necessarily slow and cumbersome.

The way I use the start menu (on both kde and windows) is by pressing the win key, then typing (part of) the name of a program and pressing enter. I don't even look at it most of the time so it's convenient that it occupies little space on my screen. But I see how that's different from how the vast majority of people use it

@TheLinuxEXP

Жыл бұрын

On this case, using KRunner makes more sense!

It really depends on what you think is _easy_ to install. If you compare the Windows store and the app center of your distro, they pretty much have the same functionality. I can't even say one is better than the other since both have positive and negative sides to it. If you talk about installing applications through a single file (eg. .exe or .deb) Linux clearly falls behind Windows here. I never had any issue with some missing files or dependencies on Windows. Plus there is only one .exe file for "Windows" and there is not one package for Home and one for Pro Edition like there is with Linux for Debian, Arch, Red Hat, etc. The single package usually works with many different versions of Windows and can thereby be used over many years. On eg. Ubuntu one application may works with 22.10 but not on 23.04 for some reason even there is no LTS step between them (and don't even think about Arch here)

@sysbofh

Жыл бұрын

== Edited for typos == It's the creator's fault. If You want something to "just work" in, basically, every Linux Distro there is one simple solution: compile static and send all needed libraries with it. Yes, it can be done. Yes, it will be bigger. No, usually it's not done. But can be done. Compile once, create 3 files: one .rpm, one .deb (that's about 99,5% of all Distros out there, and 100% of the "normal" ones) and one .tgz - a portable version. Done. "But it can't be done!" Of course it can. Excluding the package part, how do You think native games are installed on Steam/Linux? Yes, static compiled, with all libraries coming with it.

@AstoundingAmelia

Жыл бұрын

@@sysbofh Or you can make it a flatpak or appimage witch most distros run oob

@sysbofh

Жыл бұрын

@@AstoundingAmelia Yeah. A solution looking for a problem. Now, with 4 different users on the system, we have the same installation - times four. Not to mention the basic libraries used by flatpak/appimage. No, thanks.

@PassifloraCerulea

Жыл бұрын

​@@sysbofh I prefer older ways with less 'machinery' and duplication as well, but it seems most disagree :-/ Maybe the biggest draw of flatpak/appimage is that they have lots of structure and best practices around how to package things. Guard rails that make people feel safer on both programmer and user ends. And lord knows how everything has to be _safe_ nowadays.

@sysbofh

Жыл бұрын

@@PassifloraCerulea I don't know. Seems pretty safe to me just to compile static, send everything in one package (or several, if they want to) and put it in "/opt//

Most of the people I've helped in basic computing skills are looking for a set and forget experience. They don't want to continually educate themsleves, especially if it was confusing enough the frst time, were they only had YT to guide them. When you add how MS is preloaded to most pcs sold and dominate the marketing and information space, it's easy to understand why the masses using pcs are uneducated, sceptical, follow habits rather than understanding and don't like to change their UX/UI. The last thing a person needs is another issue were not being able to find the bloody files they were looking for, or a new way to interact is expected. Removing this anxiety and demonstrating rather than lecturing to people, makes a huge difference. I appluad any that do this. Especially if you can get past the cynicism were UX/UI is a weapon to hide what big tech is really doing on your pc.

The size of the Start Menu is optimized for the use with a mouse since Windows 95, so you don't have to move around the whole screen to navigate the start menu. And up to windows 10 the placement of the Start button in a corner is to allow the pointer to get stuck in the corner. This is for the intended use (Desktop PCs) a very good design. I understand the critique for touch interfaces (Gnome gets the split just right), but this doesn't 'spoil linux desktops' as it is up to the user which desktop fits them best.

Thank you again, from my point of view, you are one of the best ways to stay informed about Linux news. It's fast and efficient. I loved the troll about Arch at 13:10 XD, even though we all know it's more stable than Fedora (When you know how to configure and administer it) ;). And yes, UI discussions are quite subjective. KDE > Gnome !

@TheLinuxEXP

Жыл бұрын

Thanks a lot ☺️

@fantasypvp

Жыл бұрын

arch is the most stable distro fr 🤣

@Ptero4

Жыл бұрын

That was quite a blow aimed to the balls there, the aspect of Winblows update (and Winblows in general) being more unstable than a rolling release Linux distro.

@fantasypvp

Жыл бұрын

@@Ptero4 i wouldn't say it's more unstable but definitely as unstable XD. if you're careful with updates, both windows and arch can be very stable, the difference is that arch doesnt force you to update before you're ready

Ah, I was wondering when you'd bring this up. I love how you go into all the UX elements of a cohesive desktop and Windows creates bad habits and it needs to be called out. A "perfect" UX is a very subjective and personal choice, but I do like to think we can all benefit from more consistency in which ever one we want to use. On KDE, I stick to QT applications when possible for this consistency. On GNOME/Cinnamon/Mate/etc., I'll use more GTK applications. When COSMIC comes out for PopOS....well we'll just have to wait and see what happens with it. In any case, I'm hoping to see more app stores on Linux handle the different packaging formats more seamlessly as they aren't all at the same level of maturity for that.

If you want efficiency, optimise the most common cases the most, optimise other common cases, and have a fallback for everything else. When it comes to launching, the start menu is that fallback. Everything I commonly use, on Windows, is on the taskbar, and/or with an Autohotkey combo. On KDE it's all key combos (I launch Chrome with Win+W, Konsole with Win+T, File manager with Win+E (a throwback to Windows), Kate with Win+N (on Windows this launches notepad++), and a few things like Libreoffice take up Win+1,Win+2 and so on). For many things I have to-character commands defined so that e.g. "Win+T o / " opens up the file manager in the root, for example -- any activity I repeat, if I can, I reduce to scripts and shorthands. What annoys me is that I can't for example, from the command line, say 'launch Chrome if necessary, open a new Chrome window on desktop 1 of activity 2, open three tabs in it, and switch to that activity/desktop'. And so on. AppleScript toys us with the potential, which has fallen by the wayside. Ultimately I want everything to be controllable easily by scripts. For example xdotool I would like to turn into Python and Rust libraries (though this is beyond my ability at present), likewise many command line utilities.

The sad thing with program installation is that the Microsoft Store has been there for years now, so in theory there should be no need for downloading wizards and clicking "next" 10 times. But old habits die hard, and thus the Microsoft Store ends up ignored by everyone, from users to developers

In defense of KDE while the default menu has the issue you mention, the alternatives available solve that. An application dashboard is one of the three alternative widgets included.

I wonder if anyone remembers the old "games" on early Windows like Windows 3. There was this adventure game where the puzzles would explain Windows UI/UX decisions as sort of puzzles to teach people how windows works. I wonder if we need something like that for linux? Though how you tarrget all the different distributions is probably going to be a headache.

That's why I like Gnome the most. They don't care about how windows is or how people used to work with their PC. They do what is needed and people can get used to it.

Thank you for mentioning about the Gnome app grid and how it can be sorted/grouped. I'll also be using Fly-Pie as I've always hated having to press Windows/Super or dragging my mouse all the way into the corner (or worse, down to the middle of the screen and then offset with each additional program thanks to Windows 11).

I never got used to the GNOME app launcher, although I had been working with GNOME for quiete a while, but I instead prefer classic (Windows-like) start menus as in Cinnamon or Xfce. However, I also think that the recent Windows 11 start menu is bad, because it presents when opening just a limited selection of apps (and mostly white space) and not the complete list and no fast navigation to certain locations. While I certainly get the point of the inconsistent UI of the control panel and the settings app, the more drastic problem is the fragmented distribution of settings between those two and the lack of advanced features within the settings app (I would be much more pleased with an graphically overhauled full-function control panel because of the minimalistic approach of the settings app). There are many additional minor issues with Windows (11) which got really annoying; an additional click to get advanced features of the old context menu, the listing of recently and frequently opened files, the removal of the „Create new text document“, and also non-UI-related issues; Being forced to use a Microsoft account during installation or „On this day“-notification from OneDrive. There were many instances, where I had to edit registry entries (because of the non-existence of the corresponding settings) just to get the desired behavior back. I generally get the impression, Microsoft is forcing someone to work in a specific way, they assume to be the correct one, which might be desirable or at least acceptable for most but not for everyone. Linux on the other hand offers so many possibilities to let the system behave exactly like you want it to!

I mostly use a tiling window manager with key bindings to open my favorite apps. For other applications, I just use a fuzzy finder. Didn't use a traditional start menu in a long time now, in years.

@TheLinuxEXP

Жыл бұрын

Yeah, that’s a good setup!

@thingsiplay

Жыл бұрын

@@TheLinuxEXP I also want add the fact that most files are opened up with default associated programs anyway. So there is even less of a reason for such a start menu (at least for me).

Here's an anecdote: there's a few old laptops at university here that are only used for teachers to connect to the projector at the classroom and display presentations. I was like "ok, I'll just install a lightweight linux and be done with it" so I installed Debian with XFCE. I *STILL* got someone complaining he couldn't figure it out, even with shortcuts to libreoffice in the desktop AND the taskbar, the taskbar being placed at the bottom and the whisker menu at the bottom left corner just like in windows.

I get all your points, Nick. I too am one of those who even after two decades on Linux still get confused about where certain files are located on the filesystem. As for the startmenu debate however, I couldn't tell what to make better or different.

Corrections to this video: 1. The disjointed Windows UI dates back to Windows 8, not Windows Vista. 2. No, Windows apps' "data and libraries" are not stored in the same directory as an application's binaries. Shared system libraries needed by an application can be stored in the system's shared libraries store and it's been the case forever, and since Windows XP it also automatically manages different versions of those. And for user data there's been a standard way of storing them, and protecting application binaries with different access rights by default, since Windows Vista. Software that does not follow this is either old (often pre-Vista) or bad software (yes, even some Microsoft apps like Teams are guilty of this and therefore are bad software). Note that those two points are directly following Windows' strong position in backwards software compatibility, and large market share. Apple manages to force developers into compliance at the cost of backwards compatibility and limited choice of hardware which also limits its total market share; and Linux only avoids those problem because it has a low market share. If it was as popular as Windows, it would also start to attract developers who don't care about standards in the same way. 3. You'r arguing in bad faith in your "install procedure comparison". It's also perfectly possible to install a program on Windows the same way as on Linux: you go through Microsoft Store (has existed for 11 years now, btw). It now even supports for quite some time the packaging of old Win32 apps as store apps, so developers can publish their apps on it. Now please tell me how to install a program on Linux that isn't available on any supported 'repo', so we can all laugh a bit and see if it's easier than on Windows (last time I had to do it, it had at least as many steps as on Windows, plus additional ones if something didn't work right at first, which often happened). You then acknowledge this very problem while making like it's Windows' fault users don't go through their distro's app repo, but sometimes they don't have a choice.

@Sora-el-manco

3 ай бұрын

Corrections for your incorrect corrections: 1. Win 8 might be the most drastic or shocking UI change for you, but this problem has definitely been a thing for a very long time. Just compare the control panel with some of its own submenus or the registry UI, for example. 2. Just look at literally any program data folder. See all of those .dll files and folder mess? Yeah that shit isn't a thing outside windows. 3. Who even uses that? I mean, that store only has a few propietary Micro$oft programs and maybe a couple other things from asus or google. No community allowed here. It's also worth nothing that programs installed through that official and secure method are way harder to troubleshoot and fail more. You can't even add extra reposotories, so that's literally everything. Compare that to a GUI running a "get this program from this direction and install it", where most of the things you'll ever need are likely already there, and if you need it you can add more sources.

@Olivyay

3 ай бұрын

@@Sora-el-manco 1. The Vista/7 Control Panel just added new widgets to the classic Win32 controls, it's not a "disjointed UI" like is the case with the difference between new "Win UI" apps and old Win32 apps. 2. Those DLLs are not shared system libraries, it's code belonging to the application itself. Hence why it's in the application's own binaries directory. It's how software is developed, look it up. 3. Who uses the Microsoft Store? Definitely more people than the total Linux users.

Funnily enough I hardly used the start menu on windows. I prefer a vertical task bar with pinned apps, pretty much like the Unity desktop. Not being able to do this on newer windows was part of what held me to Win 7 for a long time, but now I use KDE and can do what I want.

Installing applications from a web download is absolutely more difficult on Linux. The main reason for this is that Windows usually walks you through the install. Linux applications (with the exception of .deb files or install files like those) don't usually include much instruction and certainly don't walk you through how to actually install the file. Many developers just assume you know how. This greatly hurts the Linux community as those who aren't as computer illiterate don't know how to overcome the issue.

@TheLinuxEXP

Жыл бұрын

You never need to do a web download for an app on Linux, that’s the point.

@benzhere

Жыл бұрын

@@TheLinuxEXP Well unfortunately an overwhelming amount of applications I have come across that are not available on software stores require you to compile code, manually add libraries via terminal, or just plain install the program via terminal. Personally, I can handle this, but the average user cannot. One of the best examples would be Canon with their proprietary printer driver install on Linux; it's terrible. I'm a daily Linux user, I am impressed by how many applications are available on the various software stores these days and it only seems to be getting better!

If I wanted to always be looking only at the center of the screen and never move my eyes, I certainly wouldn't have bought a 32 inch monitor. I would have bought a 3 inch monitor.

Defiantly agree with your point about the start menu, I've switched to using Powertoys Run(basically like Mac Spotlight search), and it's soo much nicer. Granted, I was already towards the tech-savy side and have gotten used to using a keyboard more than a mouse, but it just makes things so much quicker

@CorrosiveCitrus

Жыл бұрын

powertoys run is so good! should be standard in windows.

There are far too many fundamental problems with the Linux desktop experience to be slinging schmoo at Windows (which is also broken in various regards). Install the most recent GNOME release, launch the file explorer and attempt to navigate to a specific system path. You will find it to be impossible unless you happen to know the specific keyboard shortcut, as there exists no button for that simple function within the interface.

@TheLinuxEXP

Жыл бұрын

That’s only an issue on GNOME, not on Linux. All other desktops handle that normally. Doesn’t invalidate any of my points!

@WeebLabs

Жыл бұрын

​@@TheLinuxEXP Any issue that exists within any desktop environment is necessarily only an issue with that environment and not with the Linux kernel itself. That means very little to a new and casual Linux user, who will expect such fundamental functionality to be present and simply give up in favor of Windows when it isn't. It happens far too often. If we want Linux to gain a foothold as a desktop platform for everybody, ignoring blatant problems for ideological reasons isn't the way to do it. The GNOME issue was submitted as a ticket four years ago and the response was effectively "learn the keyboard shortcuts; we don't really care". That is a mentality that needs to change.

I completely agree with the start menu rant. Microsoft is completely aware of this, but when they rolled out Metro UI, everyone lost their mind as if it was a bad change to the system. This is why Settings -> Personalisation -> Start -> Use Start full screen is ON for me!

Software updates being manageable and basically trustworthy again on Linux was such a breath of fresh air. No more ads and bloat and tracking. Windows 10 will be my last version of that OS.

11:56, On this point I actually think it's better on windows to some extent in that you don't have to map in separate directories for the libraries, all in 1 place excluding the system libraries.

@bluesillybeard

Жыл бұрын

In the world of Linux, looking at executable and library files manually is never something that should be done. Package managers always. I do agree that on Windows, where package managers are little more than a pipe dream, it is actually better that way.

With arch, the only things that have broken for me are openGL and bluetooth. Surprisingly nvida has given me little to no issue in the last 7 years or so

2:20 Thats why I loved the Windows 10 full screen start menu so much. Idc how many people say it is bad. It has help my workflow so much.

I've been using windows ever since I started using a computer 25 years back. I shifted to Linux 12 years back. And I've used it exclusively for around 7 years, with no windows. But in recent times, I've been using both again. I felt almost all of the points you mentioned are, as you said, subjective. The only two things I hate about windows are: one, windows update, and two, the fear of annoying viruses and malwares. I can honestly say that I get more stuff done, more efficiently, on Windows than on Linux due to the availability of apps. And when you're getting stuff done, I think you forget about everything else (design philosophies and stuff). Because you are focussed on your application. So end of the day, it depends on why you use a computer. But yes, if all these apps are available on Linux, then I'd definitely let Windows go. :)

The Start menu feels way less efficient than using a keyboard activated launcher. Maybe it’s good for newbs, but there is still a lot of cognitive load in parsing all the options. Good video.

@TheExileFox

Жыл бұрын

Since win7 and vista you have had the option to type into the menu to get to where you want. Before that you had arrow keys to navigate with, so this doesn't quite hold up as well as you think.

@KrishnaDraws

Жыл бұрын

@@TheExileFox sure! But the search results have usually been “meh”. A search for Photoshop requires that I type the whole word in. Smart search functionality is lacking, imho.

@sysbofh

Жыл бұрын

@@KrishnaDraws I don't know in Windows, but with KDE most surely not. Open the menu, and start typing - it will auto complete after the first letter. Not to mention that if You type outside any text box, it will do the same.

@cigmorfil4101

Жыл бұрын

I dunno, for the seldom used applications, the menu provides a way where I can easily look for them (when using the GUI); for my more frequently used ones I have shortcuts set up.

I remember the first thing I hated about gnome 3 was the app grid. I find it very uncomfortable to move my mouse around that much to get to the app I wanted because they are now occupying the whole screen. I've since moved to kde and always have my app launcher in a centered panel that refuses according to the opened windows. So in both cases I'm closer to win11 😅. Although I think you make a fair point and I might consider playing around with different launchers

@cameronbosch1213

Жыл бұрын

I agree. GNOME 3 & later is _not_ for everybody. It certainly wasn't for me. I tried to use Ubuntu after being away for over 7 years, and when I got back, GNOME 3.whatever Ubuntu was using on version 18.10 was too unfamiliar to me and I left to go back to Windows 10. It wasn't until I tried KDE Plasma (at the time 5.20) that I wanted to stay on Linux, only confirmed by Windows 11.

@JodyBruchon

Жыл бұрын

App grids are objectively inferior to app lists with colorful icons in alphabetical order.

6:09 Yes a menu similar to Windows BUT that menu is also organized by category. Gnome menu doesn't really organize by category, and nether does Windows.

The fullscreen big icon type of application launcher from desktops like GNOME or macOS really make things harder for me to find than a simple alphabetical list.

I actually find windows installation better overall, due to consistency. At least I expect a convoluted process and generally know it. In Linux, over half the apps I use are not in package managers and require me to download it, which for Linux, is far less consistent. I do love the ease of the package manager when I do get to use it

Nick, you are correct about the muscle memory of users of windows who are still in the Microsoft ecosystem. I believe the whole concept of the menu system in Microsoft Windows is to consume time. Although the app launch process is just familiar to people, it is carried over to Linux and it just works for many new users who are making the transition from MSW. I can only echo the superiority of gnome 40+ over the "old" menu structure. Since I made the switch to Linux in 2008 it's been a roller coaster of changes. it's only been improving, getting so much faster and I spend less time sitting at a desk. furthermore, because I can get things needed to be done at my workstation faster, I have more time to focus on my physical health. I love Linux. There is no way I would ever install MSW again on any computer, in fact, I haven't since 2006. Enduring UI crashes and lost data enough for a good year and a half, the obvious choice was RHEL. Now I use Fedora Linux because it is even faster.

The start menu was fixed by metro tiles and becoming resizable. The reason it doesn’t cover the whole screen is so that it’s easy to exit. True power users just create keyboard shortcuts for apps, which is a step down the window manager path of using one’s computer. While GNOME is more visually cohesive, some usability features are locked behind custom themes. For example, you need a theme if you want to move the titlebar buttons to the other side of the window, resize a button’s hitbox so that it extends all the way to the corner of the window, or just use a dark theme that’s easy on the eyes. GTK has some very annoying faults, and the GNOME developers don’t seem to care because those things don’t factor into the design of the GNOME desktop. GTK is more than just GNOME, and its lack of flexibility without total theming matters in other desktops. Also, even if we had the perfect toolkit and associated desktop, there will always be apps that people use which use their own designs. Steam is one such program. Aside from those two points, I think this video is very much on-point. Finding all of one’s data on a Windows is a real bear, and I think it’s something many former Windows users (now Linux users) can attest to.

The start menu is not a multitasking thing by itself, BUT you can have other things open on your screen that you don't want to cover when searching for something in the menu, I HATE full screen launchers that make no sense on desktop computers..

I'm not a fan of many things about Windows, but I do appreciate the Windows UI design. I use XFCE because it closely resembles the classic Windows appearance. With Windows, you have a nice GUI tool for everything, whereas on Linux, you have to type everything as if you're on a Commodore 64.

@bionic-beaver

Жыл бұрын

Depends on what you're trying to do, even on Windows you need to bring up CMD or PowerShell to make some changes

In regards to the start menu: you said it best that UI/UX is subjective. As someone who's first modern computer was windows 8 back in 2013 and prior computers I had were XP laptops as hand me downs, I find that start menus/launchers akin to Windows 8 feels like I'm using an iPad without a touch screen. I don't inherently think that the start screen/full screen launcher approach is bad, but really only works on a touch screen interface. When I briefly used macOS, I never used the launcher, but rather launched programs from ~/Applications or through Spotlight. The full screen launcher that Gnome has is the main reason why I don't use Gnome. That being said, I cannot speak as to how much better a full screen launcher would work with a touch screen as I have yet to get a computer with a touch screen, I've always used a keyboard and mouse/trackpad. That's just my two cents though.

4:21 you can create folders for the all apps list, just move the shortcuts in the start menu folder into a folder in file explorer. its very simple

As someone who has used Windows, Mac and Linux for many years, much of this is solved by using desktop shortcuts for frequently used apps, quick launch links in the start bar, and organizing them into folders or categories.

It doesn't matter how pretty your linux desktop is at the end of the day if there is no across the board compatibility. You can't even get some apps to work on the same kernel on different distros. Maybe it would be better to push devs to solve the compatibility issue than it would be to be upset about subjective design influences. Since that is what effects the market share the most. At least that is what I hear daily when I suggest linux to others. They do not talk about the interface, they complain about not wanting to live in fear of a simple update destroying their app compatibility.

@TheLinuxEXP

Жыл бұрын

Would you expect to run a mac program windows? An Android app on iOS? Why should Linux run Windows apps? And Linux apps run across all distros no issues

Жыл бұрын

@@TheLinuxEXP what he was saying was that in 79% of the market (windows) you develop one version of an app and it works. In Linux, the same version number of an app might or might not work depending on kernel, dependencies or even packaging method. IF you package and distriute via flathub, you just created a pain point for yubuntu users... that is 30% of the 5% of the Linux market.

I like the files being in one place makes it easier to find. Been running arch for a while now and do all the updates when they pop up and my exp has been rock solid. I thought using an nvidia gfx card would hurt stability considering support is relatively new but I have had no problems.

@fulconandroadcone9488

Жыл бұрын

I run manjaro, and besides some hardware compatibility I forget that I have updates, I get a notification, click install enter password and it's done. Now I'm excited to get next kerenl version instead of dreading will windows update mismatch my drivers or something.

@captgeoff0713

Жыл бұрын

My Linux journey has been Manjaro, Mabox, then Arch. I installed my current Arch system 11 months ago and I've had an excellent experience despite knowing nothing about the Linux file system or really anything other than pacman/yay and pamac. I have yet to touch fedora or any debian derivative.

The windows 11 Taskbar and start menu are an absolute disaster, pretty much all the functionality and customizability that was introduced in 7 and kept in 10 is gone

I recently installed Linux Mint on my mom's PC (it was Windows 8) and she can do it. She said it's faster now, and found how to do things like printing herself before I could teach her how to do. At 72 years old she is another Windows user converted to a Linux user.