We shouldn't need scientists or science educators to fend off creationists. Everyone should be able to dismiss their bullshit easily.

@anonasocah

8 жыл бұрын

*Should*

@guyincognito2512

8 жыл бұрын

+Taxtro What to prove your theory, crossbreed and see what happend or stfu.

@henochparks

8 жыл бұрын

+Taxtro EXCEPT CREATIONISTS HAVE REPEATEDLY PROVEN EVOLUTIONISTS WRONG.

@randolphpatterson5061

8 жыл бұрын

+henochparks Sorry, but creationists haven't ever proven a single thing outside of their wealth of ignorance.

@henochparks

8 жыл бұрын

+randolph patterson THE EVIDENCE SHOWS INTELLIGENT DESIGN. IS THAT IGNORANCE?

Creationism : because reading one book written by idiots, is a lot easier than reading a bunch of hard ones.

@AneurysmXX

10 жыл бұрын

and thats why you are not a scientist, just a gullible sheep, following a book full of crap. Its funny, if creationism has just some evidence, instead of logical fallacies, maybe you wouldnt get laughed at all the time.

@miawick1

10 жыл бұрын

Michael Brown And that's why you think creationism would be actual science ^^ I make it easy for you. Real science , like the theory of evolution, leads to new technologies and inventions. We learn new things about nature, that lead to breakthroughs in other fields. It is interconnected in many ways with other fields etc.etc.etc. But creationism never lead to anything, no invention, no technology, no new insights into nature, NOTHING WHATSOEVER. So obviously it is not real science, and nobody needs to learn about it. This is so easy and straightforward even you should understand it ^^

@kodofile

10 жыл бұрын

AneurysmXX Shut up there are no science in evolution, and you're believing it in spite of the evidence pointing to the contrary!

@isuckharderthanlife590

10 жыл бұрын

+kodofile There is not enough aluminium in the universe to fold a hat big enough against the theory of evolution. Suck up your loss.

@miawick1

10 жыл бұрын

kodofile Let me give the same answer to you, which I gave to Michael : QUOTE:"And that's why you think creationism would be actual science ^^ I make it easy for you. Real science , like the theory of evolution, leads to new technologies and inventions. We learn new things about nature, that lead to breakthroughs in other fields. It is interconnected in many ways with other fields etc.etc.etc. But creationism never lead to anything, no invention, no technology, no new insights into nature, NOTHING WHATSOEVER. So obviously it is not real science, and nobody needs to learn about it. This is so easy and straightforward even you should understand it ^^ "

As a believer in the Earth being flat and 6,000 years old, I am pleased to announce my wife and I are expecting to take custody of a new baby via stork-delivery at 4.50pm this afternoon.

@eogg25

3 жыл бұрын

Only some Christians believe the 6 K theory but i don't know anyone who believes the earth is flat As far as Dawkins beliefs, that's all it is, he talks to people that believe like he does, He is a typical Anti Christ but I don't know who is right but I will not leave it up to chance because He who laughs last, Last best.

@inyourgenes

3 жыл бұрын

@@eogg25 Professor Dawkins chooses the scientific method, which is based on evidence and reasoning, and states the Theory of Evolution is 100% a fact. It is not Professor Dawkins personal belief but rather the consensus of the educated and knowledgeable.......and I guess you are not one of those people probably because you are too stupid (or lazy) to understand science and Professor Dawkins says things you dislike/conflict with your own fantasy and so you label him "anti-christ", which for an atheist means nothing, to you (and your labelling of him) makes Prof Dawkins the essence of evil. Strange as Richard Dawkins is one of the most patient, kind, generous people you will ever encounter. I guess that says little about you as a compassionate, caring, emotionally-intelligent human being.

@eogg25

3 жыл бұрын

@@inyourgenes I like the way you say the consensus of the educated and the Knowledgeable' The name calling doesn't bother me and i did not say i dislike him and or that i conflict with him and it does not make any difference what an atheist thinks. I don't know the man personally like you do to say those kind words about him. As far as being a compassionate, caring, emotionally intelligent human being, I don't know you and you don't know me. But remember what I said He who laughs last laugh's best. Unfortunately for you and him, if he is wrong, I won't be Laughing but I might say Told you so And if he is right it won't make any difference. so for me its a win win situation.

@inyourgenes

3 жыл бұрын

@@eogg25 What if you are wrong about your god.....which I assume is Yahweh. It might be Thor or Zeus or Jupiter or one of the many 1000's of other gods humans have dreamed-up. You won't be laughing when you die and stand in front of, for example, Aphrodite and apologise for worshipping the wrong god. At least the atheist can say "you never gave me enough information to demonstrate you were real".....which is much more of a "winning" argument than your pathetic Pascal's Wager.

@MacLaw3084

3 жыл бұрын

eogg25 do you not realize how many people Dawkins talks to that don’t believe like him? why do you think atheists know the positions and arguments of christians better than they the christians know theirs?

Avoid playing chess with a pigeon too...

@specialk7715

5 жыл бұрын

Darcy Whyte Are you speaking from experience?? And what’s that got to do with anything??

@rld8258

4 жыл бұрын

@castroy64 ironic

@mark48125

4 жыл бұрын

I never played chess with a pigeon but I did play hop-scotch with a kangaroo...and lost!

@uncaboat2399

3 жыл бұрын

@castroy64 And here we have your typical creationist who ran out of civil arguments some time ago so must now resort to insults to get attention. "Look at me, look at me, I know how to sling mud!"

@uncaboat2399

3 жыл бұрын

@Michael Brown Well, to be perfectly honest, evolution actually really is simply a system of beliefs. A "cult" of sorts. Exactly the way creationism is simply a system of beliefs. We'll just ignore that mountain of supporting evidence for now ... Wait a sec, where's the mountain of evidence? Creationists? Hello? Somebody help me out here, go look in the back and see what the Creationists did with their evidence. I'm sure I saw a mountain of supporting evidence for creationism back there somewhere. Maybe God is hiding it.

He never debates with them because he cannot say anything adequate enough when presented with numerous flaws in evolution theory. Which then makes him a believer in evolution, not scientist. So he is correct when says it will look no good in his cv

"That would look great on _your_ CV; not so good on _mine_ ." That sums it up nicely. YE Creationists, Flerfers, and the like want to debate scientists for one reason only: to score points with (and secure donations from) their core believers, who already buy into their pseudo-scientific claptrap. Scientists' reputations, on the other hand, can get compromised in the eyes of their peers by them giving said claptrap the time of day.

@diyimprover6887

3 жыл бұрын

@Kile I highly doubt many atheists (nor anyone else) equate flat-earthism with christianity. They are two different circles in a Venn diagram representing two different subsets of the willfully ignorant. While they may overlap slightly, representing those who hold to both ludicrous viewpoints, they are, by and large, separate and distinct groups.

@richardevans560

3 жыл бұрын

I doubt you'd score many points if your argument didn't hold together. I suspect Dawkins is able to talk from a script but can't think on his feet

@davidbanner6230

3 жыл бұрын

@@diyimprover6887 : DIY Improve ... They won't (or canr't) understand so you're wasting your time...

@davidbanner6230

3 жыл бұрын

You mean to say that scientists don't talk claptrap when it time to get their government grants renewed ?

@paulmadryga

3 жыл бұрын

@@davidbanner6230 - I doubt there'd be much of that, considering that the people in charge of awarding/renewing government science grants are themselves scientists, and would thus be able to spot pseudo-scientific claptrap from a mile away.

Personally I always found it hard to talk to someone who thinks they already have the answer

@allanliang9072

2 жыл бұрын

Profound. I think a person who thinks they know the answer before they know the question is foolish. But the person who thinks they know the answer because they already know the question is a pretty different case. Just some food for thought.

@krishammond8851

2 жыл бұрын

@@allanliang9072 terrible food for thought

@allanliang9072

2 жыл бұрын

@@krishammond8851 probably because you can’t stomach it.

@elusive4072

Жыл бұрын

Yeah it's hard talking to atheists.

@schwarzwolfram7925

Жыл бұрын

@@allanliang9072 Or because it's not meant to be consumed.

Not a great title for the video, there are tons of videos on youtube of Dawkins debating creationists

@englephat

3 жыл бұрын

He doesn't debate them because he doesn't argue their arguments

@sqrt-1646

3 жыл бұрын

@@englephat What part of “no longer debates with” do you not understand?

@englephat

3 жыл бұрын

@@sqrt-1646 hey mate I think you missed my point. I mean that when he used to debate them he wouldn't properly dismantle their arguments

@wtbogoid612

3 жыл бұрын

@@englephat how do you dismantle an argument if the argument is already flawed? Why should I dismantle an argument from someone who believes the earth is flat? They're already wrong.

@englephat

3 жыл бұрын

@@wtbogoid612 if someone has a shit argument then it should be easy to pull it down

This is why Bill Nye shouldn't have dignified Ken Ham with a debate. Hacks like Ham don't get a seat at the grownup's table.

@caleb8239

9 жыл бұрын

Maybe you missed out on the details, but Ham payed Nye an impressive lump of cash to debate. Debates are really an entertainment event used for the generating of cash money to make the organizers nice and rich.

@American-Plague

5 жыл бұрын

@@caleb8239 You sound a little condescending. What exactly is wrong with organizers who are doing their job get paid for doing their job? They aren't embezzling money are they? I mean they COULD be but so could anyone else who is also getting paid money to do their own job.

@ram29jackson

5 жыл бұрын

Lol who said Bill Nye knew anything? He's a govt paid shill..neither creationism now evolution are correct .

@American-Plague

5 жыл бұрын

@@ram29jackson Do you have a better argument than totally baseless conspiratorial rantings of people being a paid government shill? That's the same argument that all conspiratards use. Flat Earthers, moon landing hoax believers, chemtrail believers, religious nuts, etc. because you and they have no REAL defense.

@ram29jackson

5 жыл бұрын

@@American-Plague it means it gas nothing to do with learning truth. They just enjoy separating people with trivial shit. Profiting off stupid sheep.

Mathematicians dont debate people who say 1+1=7 .... enough said

@philaypeephilippotter6532

3 жыл бұрын

@Michael Brown Humans, even you, *Michael,* _are_ apes. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hominidae

@solon2923

3 жыл бұрын

@Michael Brown let me guess u look identical, absolutely identical to your parents right ? and we never bread dogs or horses, they just popped into existence by the power of God/magic, and we never flew the the moon right, science and NASA are just trying to make us believe the earth is a globe and not center of the universe, any of your other beliefs I forgot to mention ?

@Snowman-hunter

3 жыл бұрын

@Michael Brown Can't wait for all you nut cases to finally die out. Bet you also believe the earth's flat

@hombrearena

3 жыл бұрын

Folks, Michael Brown here is just providing an example of what NOT to debate. Random absurdities, rapidly replaced by new random absurdities and non-sequiturs. There is nothing to debate, he's just trying to wind you up! As was the point of the video, do not waste your time and energy 'debating' with trolls or insane people. The most beautifully constructed and amply supported argument will be brushed aside with an absurdity and he will throw two new absurdities at you. Pointless.

@budd2nd

3 жыл бұрын

Michael Brown I take it that you deny the overwhelming evidence, without actually examining it for yourself? Please go to any natural history museum, I don’t know where in the world you live but your nearest city will have one. That museum will have a huge amount of the physical evidence for evolution for you to look at and examine for yourself.

When Eric eats a banana an amazing transformation occurs, Eric is Bananaman! Ever alert for the call to action!

@cranezilla1016

5 жыл бұрын

What do you mean by Banana?

Why Richard Dawkins Doesn't Debate Creationists - Because they actually provide evidence.

Evolution cannot withstand actual scrutiny…he won’t debate creationists because he’ll be humiliated…and he knows it.

@logicalatheist1065

2 жыл бұрын

Says the scientifically illiterate delusional creationist

@lennon7978

2 жыл бұрын

AHAHAHAHAHA

@lennon7978

2 жыл бұрын

Wow, I'm laughin out loud in real life, thank you for your comment, it made me laugh so much, you sheep are funny af !

*Simply beautiful, from Pascal, with love:* _There are only three types of people; those who have found God and serve him; those who have not found God and seek him, and those who live not seeking, or finding him. The first are rational and happy; the second unhappy and rational, and the third foolish and unhappy._

@Conan-Le-Cimmerien

12 сағат бұрын

Counter-example. You are a theist, you are not reasonable.

@atheism-themoststupidrelig5703

6 сағат бұрын

@@Conan-Le-Cimmerien *Sorry if Pascal made u mad, b-allet dancer Eldridge.* 😂😂😂

@Conan-Le-Cimmerien

45 минут бұрын

​@@atheism-themoststupidrelig5703 Why would someone being plain wrong makes me mad? You just provided another example of you being unreasonable.

The fact that William Lane Craig debunked Richards God Delusion book and Richard won't make any replies tells me everything I need to know.

"The end is nigh! Repent!" Without religion, we wouldn't have had such a satisfying and wholesome phrase. Therefore, GOD.

I have been told to read Dawkins work on Evolution and I would see the proof. Well, I have read a lot of Dawkins and I find the same thing in all his writings. SPECULATIVE REASONING when it comes to how any Biological process proves Evolution.

@RCSNIPER34

2 жыл бұрын

It's impossible for nothing to create anything.. Especially for nothing to create an entire universe. The only reason people don't believe that there is a God is either because they are running away from the truth, or they have never heard the truth and have only been brainwashed like I was by evolution. Evolution makes no sense and there is no evidence for it. There are so many holes in the theory and it is taught in school as if it has been proven and isn't a theory. I always wondered where we came from, not just humans, but everything. I'm not the type of person who needs a God to be able to cope with life, but I am the type of person that wants to find the truth. The more results that scientists are finding are pointing towards creation and a creator.. And they keep trying to bend the rules with time and ridiculous theories and explanation that cause them to have blind faith. If we evolved from anything, then there should be at least one piece of evidence in either the fossils or an example of a lizard turning into a bird or any kind turning into another. There just isn't any evidence.. It's not a "missing link" in the tree of life, the whole forest is missing for the evolutionists. More and more are starting to come to terms with the fact that the theory of evolution isn't a good answer for what we see in the real world today nor does it show evidence for what we see in the past. We were created by a being outside of this universe, and once you open your mind up to search for the truth.. You will see evidence for creation everywhere you look, especially the worldwide flood and how different types of life depend on each other.. The entire world depends on other organisms in a symbiotic mutualistic relationship. That can't happen in evolution because the things dependent on one another have to be there at the same time or it won't work. Just look at bees and flowers.. One doesn't work without the other being there at the exact moment, but there's thousands of examples like that all over the world.

@Chanson_Dada

2 жыл бұрын

@@RCSNIPER34 "We were created by a being outside this universe"? ....who created that being then? Turtles all the way down.

@barriejonas338

2 жыл бұрын

@@RCSNIPER34 Amazing that the Egyptians who had a written language and an extensive empire for 500 years before "The world wide flood" and for a 1,000 years after it, don't seem to have noticed it!😂Probably because they were thousands of feet underwater!

@Plato76...

2 жыл бұрын

Muppet go away

@atheism-themoststupidrelig5703

17 сағат бұрын

*Absolutely beautiful, from Dawkins:* _if you look at the details of biochemistry, molecular biology, you might find a signature of some sort of designer._ 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

He has more important things to do then hear the same regurgitated arguments from professional bullshitters.

@ilove100times

8 жыл бұрын

+vryafoat777 The Greeks borrowed some of these ideas from the Babylonians, Egyptians and Hindus, whose philosophies extended back centuries before. For example, one Hindu belief was that Brahman (the Universe) spontaneously evolved by itself like a seed, which expanded and formed all that exists about 4.3 billion years ago.6 These Hindus believed in an eternal Universe that had cycles of rebirth, destruction and dormancy, known as ‘kalpas’, rather like oscillating big bang theories. We also read in the Hindu Bhagavad Gita that the god Krishna says, ‘I am the source from which all creatures evolve.’7 Concerning the great ages of the Universe, Plato and many Greek philosophers held to the view that this present Universe came about millions of years ago. Some of the Babylonians claimed that they had astronomical inscriptions on clay tablets for 730,000 years; others, like Berosus, claimed 490,000 years for the inscriptions.4 The Egyptians claimed that they had understood astronomy for more than 100,000 years.8

@vryafoat777

8 жыл бұрын

Mat Whute Ok well first off, evolution concerns itself with the diversification of life into different forms, not with formation of the universe. Can the god Krishna bless us with the knowledge of what is the limiting factor of genetic drift? No??? Well then I'll just continue to listen to Darwin and Dawkins, fuck Krishna.

@ilove100times

8 жыл бұрын

vryafoat777 okay show a lil you know about the word religion huh? krishna is like a split from another form of religion.. aka like atheism and then you got agnostics... right.. could be can't be a god! IN FACT! your belief system of the earth is closer to greeks who don't believe such god created the earth! and if ya ever readt the bible... st paul even pointed it out! when referring to there UNKNOWN GOD! so you can say what you like bout krishna! but ya still a new age pagan! LOL! think bout it pagans are just like you.. they believe in gay marriage and baby abortions... next!

@vryafoat777

8 жыл бұрын

Mat Whute I do believe in gay people have a right to marriage, and am pro-choice, so those aren't really insults. Atheism is the lack of belief in the supernatural and science is study of the natural world. Pagan doesn't really mean anything, Christmas was originally soul invictus day, a pagan holiday that is even described in the bible. It was changed to Christmas because the rise of the byzantine empire banned all other beliefs systems other then eastern orthodox Christianity and found it was easier to make people change beliefs then change traditions. At the end of the day it don't matter what beleif is, the modern world as we know it today was made by secular reasoning.

@ilove100times

8 жыл бұрын

vryafoat777 buddy don't compare christanity with paganism when agan paganism and in rome allowed gay marriage.. believed in a billion year cycle and Yes! like hindus and buddist don't believe in a god! ha ha ha ha ha! my point is just showing as the days of noah! there is nothing new! bout the new age athiesm.. sorry paganism! kzread.info/dash/bejne/n6qFmcqMc9ypj7A.html

He is a great roaster, and he's very polite about it!

@vichuakhila7454

3 жыл бұрын

That's the only prblm I find with him. He s way too polite while roasting idiots. Hitchens is way better

@MrLethalShots

3 жыл бұрын

@@tobiasplyter6137 Dawkins should not be ashamed, he is a classier act than you.

@MrLethalShots

3 жыл бұрын

@@tobiasplyter6137 Are you sure? I don't recall ever calling you something as rude as an "idiot".

@MrLethalShots

3 жыл бұрын

@@tobiasplyter6137 Well I'm glad we agree on something :)

I think he decided on that AFTER the debates with Professor John Lennox who (believes in creation) mopped up the stage floor with Dawkens!

Theists in this comment section: “you can’t explain every single mechanism involved in evolution, therefore gawd!”

@ricoyochanan

2 жыл бұрын

Dawkins can't explain how common ancestry works, so he says evolution did it. Explaining what he can't prove, with something that hasn't been proven.

@benherrmann5934

2 жыл бұрын

@@ricoyochanan Evolution literally explains common ancestry though

@MrDogfish83

2 жыл бұрын

I’ve never understood the strategy of taking something not fully understood and saying “clearly it’s [this thing that cannot be understood]”

@joelcasemore2991

2 жыл бұрын

Evolution cant be explained at all, nothing all the way down past macro-evolution, only micro-evolution has been witnessed or better said variations in the kinds 😁

@MrDogfish83

2 жыл бұрын

@@joelcasemore2991 keep telling yourself that

if we debate with them , we give them atention and status

@crocdoc2

7 жыл бұрын

+2001Horatio Good summary, but you missed one part: The inevitable hell threat. Almost every conversation I've had with a creationist ends with them posting hell threats when they have been backed into a logical corner. *Cletis:* _"Oh yeah? Well ur a gonna go ta HELL, y'hear?"_

@crocdoc2

7 жыл бұрын

***** _"I like your Christ, I do not like your Christians. Your Christians are so unlike your Christ."_ ― Mahatma Gandhi

@specialk7715

5 жыл бұрын

Limitless 1 He has debated Christians though!!

@specialk7715

5 жыл бұрын

crocdoc2 A “logical” corner?? And what would this logical corner be exactly?? Because according to atheists.. Logic is not universal and not immaterial, it is merely chemical reactions in the brain. Therefore it’s just brain gas! So what’s the difference between one brain fizz over another brain fizz??

@arjyou4931

4 жыл бұрын

@@kaldo4 this is the stupidest reply

A debate requires the presentation of facts, of which believers have zero, and that’s why I won’t debate them.

@loganleatherman7647

2 жыл бұрын

Believers have their feelings, that’s about it. Everything else unfolds from there, including every goofy religious ideation that makes them feel better about their objective insignificance and mortality

Tnx KZread editors for largely wiping out the body of work of the devil's advocates. The spamming was intense, but now evaporated- good riddance.

Dawkins: Umm... Audience: 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

@muchanadziko6378

2 жыл бұрын

@@tobiasplyter6137 why so?

*Simply beautiful one from Max Planck - founder of modern science, read it carefully:* _As a physicist, that is, a man who had devoted his whole life to a wholly prosaic science, the exploration of matter, no one would surely suspect me of being a fantast. And so, having studied the atom, I am telling you that there is no matter as such! All matter arises and persists only due to a force that causes the atomic particles to vibrate, holding them together in the tiniest of solar systems, the atom._ _Yet in the whole of the universe there is no force that is either intelligent or eternal, and we must therefore assume that behind this force there is a conscious, intelligent Mind or Spirit. This is the very origin of all matter_

@Conan-Le-Cimmerien

12 сағат бұрын

Except that his assumption was never proven correct. That's why it's never established in science.

@atheism-themoststupidrelig5703

6 сағат бұрын

@@Conan-Le-Cimmerien *Sorry if Planck made u mad, b-allet dancer Eldridge.* 😂😂😂

@Conan-Le-Cimmerien

41 минут бұрын

​@@atheism-themoststupidrelig5703 Sorry that the scientific method makes you mad Larsen. One day you will be able to look at reality, but that day is not nigh.

If he will accept my offer I will debate Mr. Dawkins. I will use the same facts in evidence from Synergetics by Buckminster Fuller. Richard could not counter Fuller's position so it would be a convincing victory for all Creationists.

The world is not thinking, and most people on it are not thinking as well, unless compelled to by circumstances.

@atheism-themoststupidrelig5703

17 сағат бұрын

*Absolutely beautiful, from Dawkins:* _if you look at the details of biochemistry, molecular biology, you might find a signature of some sort of designer._ 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

I agree with Dawkins that sharing a platform with these muppets almost legitimises them.

@TonyEnglandUK

5 жыл бұрын

I want to see Christians having a debate with me about my god, Odin. He's making a comeback.

@darin1701

5 жыл бұрын

Please these are puppets of the establishment atheist Paid for by governments to spit propaganda

@specialk7715

5 жыл бұрын

Petyr Kowalski He has debated Christians before! Just like Lawrance Kraus and Christopher Hitchens has! So I don’t know what he or you people are on about

@revanche1431

4 жыл бұрын

@@specialk7715 Dawkins learned from those previous experiences (learning new things is a hallmark of atheism) and adjusted his behavior based on what he learned (another hallmark of atheism)

@specialk7715

4 жыл бұрын

Ryan Gentilcore So atheists can’t hold what they previously learned as “truth,” because something else might come along, where they learn that is the new “truth” and what they learned before was wrong. Right?

This comment section triggered me. Hypocrisy, idiocy, an extreme lack of self awareness, individuals that think typing in all caps makes their opinion more credible, I had to stop because the lack of intelligence in this comment section actually gave me a headache. Let this be a warning for all who venture through these comments, maybe there are mentally sound human beings commenting here, but I didn't find any in my short exploration.

@stef987

7 жыл бұрын

Thanks for the warning. Checking equipment. Going down now.

@cocricklewood4441

6 жыл бұрын

You seem to assume that your opinion is of importance? Quite why? Only you seem to know or care.

@minius8514

6 жыл бұрын

Yea, you seem to assume your opinion is of importance and is the most righteous thing. Basically, anything that is not within your beliefs are wrong. Arrogant.

@American-Plague

5 жыл бұрын

@@minius8514 You seem to assume that they seem to assume. Pretty arrogant if you ask me.

@American-Plague

5 жыл бұрын

@@cocricklewood4441 You seem to assume that your assumption of someone assuming something is of importance. Why? Only you seem to know Or care.

I have also heard that most OB-GYNs refuse to debate proponents of the Stork Theory of Human Reproduction.

@diyimprover6887

3 жыл бұрын

Most of them also refuse to engage in consults in the middle of cabbage patches. Fact.

This guy pulled me back to God with his foolish repeating argument and showing his frustration.

The contempt in his voice when he says ‘Kirk Cameron’ is glorious.

@lieslceleste3395

2 жыл бұрын

Not only is ray comfort a complete dolt, he’s really nasty.

@gz9520

Жыл бұрын

@@lieslceleste3395 And a shameless charlatan.

@tradersquarter

Жыл бұрын

@Liesl Celeste Lol, and so is Dawkins, a complete dolt and very nasty.

He gets better with age.

@benreinicke560

7 жыл бұрын

"Jesus never existed" -Richard Dawkins at an atheist rally "Jesus definitely existed" -Richard Dawkins in a debate with John Lennox

@gazzaclarkson2547

6 жыл бұрын

His middle name is Merlot....

@mountainman5025

6 жыл бұрын

So in about 4000 years he may be taken more seriously....if rapture doesn't occur first.

@mikeakridge6555

6 жыл бұрын

I don't doubt his biology but Dawkins is just like the religious world- he has never understood the Genesis creation story. He debates against mythology and then pats himself on the back. Religion has produced yet another well spoken nemesis in Dawkins. Its a symbiotic relationship. Care to have a friendly debate? Just so we are clear, my provable premise is that God created everything (except religion); Moses witnessed or was shown creation over the course of a week- like a mini series on TV; modern science including evolution agrees perfectly with the literal creation story- perfectly; and neither the Bible nor science agrees with religion. If you understand evolution, biology, and geology, then you have the capacity to understand the creation (completion) story. It agrees precisely with all of modern science. The creation story is about the transformation of Earth into a livable planet for us. It is a completion story. As life branched out, God culled it and allowed only specific forms of life to exist. The word "let" is the same as the word "allow". God allowed certain essential life as was necessary for us. Moses observed creation (in a vision perhaps) over the course of six days from a ground level perspective. You don't believe it? Read the story. This is what Moses was shown. Moses was a witness to these things. 1) Light- first sunlight through densely clouded sky.---------------------end of Hadeon Eon. 2) Clear lower atmosphere------------------------------------------------------mid Archean Eon. 3) Granite landmasses above the sea---------------------------------------end of Archean Eon Part 2)Seed bearing vegetation that will remain-------------------end of the Paleozoic Era. 4) Clear atmosphere- stars, moon visible---------------------------end of the Jurassic Period. 5) Animal life in the sea, and birds that will remain- ---------------end of the Mesozoic Era. 6) Land dwelling mammals including ancient humans ----- ~~end of the Pleistocene Epoch. Part2) Modern human called Man- later called Adam and Eve. There are 23 significant statements in the creation story and all are in order. They represent Earth's transition into the livable planet that it is today. The odds of the correct order occurring by chance is roughly 1 in ~25 sextillion. Evolution is excellent evidence for the creation story's perfect accuracy. How could Moses have gotten it right unless he was influenced by a higher intelligence? We've all heard absurdities like “The landmasses floated atop water” and “The Sun, moon, and stars were created on “day 4” etc...” These absurdities stem from one misunderstanding, namely, in early Genesis water above and below the firmament (expanse), cloud cover and sea water, are both called water. Note: they are, infact, both water. The flood story is rendered entirely plausible by this one clarification as well. The sea brought forth fish and birds and earth (dirt) brought forth both seed bearing vegetation and mammals. Sounds like evolution doesn't it? Extinctions add the ultimate intelligent touch to evolution. Mitochondrial Eve? We are all descendants of Noah who was a descendant of Adam. Adam was handmade by God. All other existing lines were destroyed at Noah's flood. Noah's sons and perhaps Noah himself were married to women outside the bloodline of Adam. Where did they come from? They came from outlying humans that had a lineage reaching back over 100,000 years. Read the creation story and consider where Cain's wife came from. Is creating and sustaining life with a process we call evolution the one thing God could not and cannot do? One other point, Heaven is defined in Genesis and is everything from Earth's surface through to infinity. It includes our atmosphere and all empty space in the universe. If you wish to understand both the biblical creation story and the flood story completely, in light of modern science (no creation science), go to mikeakridge.com and read GENESIS DECODED and NOAH'S FLOOD for free. The website is being refurbished. If you cannot find it on the website, contact me at akridge5@yahoo.com- I will email it to you free. If you don't care- have a nice day! Mike.

@sleazoid99

5 жыл бұрын

@@mikeakridge6555 "The sea brought forth fish and birds and earth (dirt) brought forth both seed bearing vegetation and mammals. Sounds like evolution doesn't it?" No. No, it doesn't.

He literally debates a lot of creationists

I don't recall seeing anything where he isn't debating creationists.

Dawkins has such a lovely naughty smirk.

@fredgillespie5855

4 жыл бұрын

A smug sneer is more like it.

@henochparks

4 жыл бұрын

@paul mortimer Dawkins has been outed as a sexual harasser ....where is his so called morals now?

@fredgillespie5855

4 жыл бұрын

@paul mortimer - I think you have the wrong law, it is all about morals and the Law is your guide to morality.

@hwd71

4 жыл бұрын

It's called Duping Delight. Duping delight- Diane Downs m.kzread.info/dash/bejne/h2Goz5WbdKTVdKg.html

@FredBTs

3 жыл бұрын

carol m yes, I’m sure he knows considerably more than you.

*Simply beautiful and powerful one from James C. Maxwell:* _Science is incompetent to reason upon the creation of matter itself out of nothing. We have reached the utmost limit of our thinking faculties when we have admitted that because matter cannot be eternal and self-existent it must have been created._

@Conan-Le-Cimmerien

12 сағат бұрын

Did you not understand the quote? It literally means that when you resort to a paranormal explanation, such as invoking a god, then you can't make intellectual progress anymore. In other words, you're not thinking anymore

@atheism-themoststupidrelig5703

6 сағат бұрын

@@Conan-Le-Cimmerien *Sorry ur rtrdtion impedes u from understanding what smart people say, b-allet dancer Eldridge.* 😂😂😂

@Conan-Le-Cimmerien

36 минут бұрын

​@@atheism-themoststupidrelig5703 Sorry for understanding English better than you. I hope that English isn't your mother tongue because if it is what is your excuse for not understanding a quote that a Frenchman understood instantly and showed that it meant the exact opposite of what you believed?

We know why Richard Dawkins doesn't debate creationists, It's because he keeps using knives at gunfights.

I disagree with Richard Dawkins on this. If you smash someone's arguments in public, then they don't have any "status". If I went on TV and (to use an example Dawkins has used himself) tried to maintain that Tennyson wrote the Iliad, in contention with a halfway decent classical scholar (like Mary Beard for example), I'd be made to look so silly that there'd be no question of my having a point worth considering. The same with flat earthers, people who think the world was created in 4004 B.C. etc.

once apon a time non living matter joined together to make a cell then turned into other living things despite having huge contradicts .

@ComradeDragon1957

7 жыл бұрын

I hope you have the evidence and logic to support your accusation.If not then you're just spitting bullshit.

@Scroteydada

6 жыл бұрын

Hmmm yes such contradicts much science knowledge yes

@atheism-the-most-stupid-religi

14 сағат бұрын

*Evolution is when you let nature select the good airplane out of the many produced by natural, random processes.*

I LOVE how humorous he is!

@craigward8886

2 жыл бұрын

@M how is that installing fear? When Jesus returns people will know he is Lord. All judgment has been rendered unto Him. If you have accepted him as your Savior you have nothing to fear.

I'm wondering ..... since the MRI machine was developed by a scientist with a creationist viewpoint, would Dawkins refuse an MRI prescribed by his doctor?

Dawkins actually cherry pics evolution for the bits that are easy to visualise and demonstrate for his supporters.

@davidbanner6230

3 жыл бұрын

Well, he does, in that he denies that the development of religion/faith was not also a development withing evolution. This because it does not lend itself to the easy explanations that can be dispensed on lecture tours.

@vryafoat777

Жыл бұрын

@@davidbanner6230 Dawkins is an evolutionary biologist who usually demonstrates evolution through the evolution of animal physiology. The development of religion or faith would be studied by an anthropologist or evolutionary psychologist, which are completely different fields of study.

I saw the flying teapot... my wife was upset with me lets just say

dawkins has a double life as a comedian.

A recent documentary revealed that Hermann Goring was not an anti-Semitic, infarct when was wounded, in the 1923 attempted Munich pouch, he was cared for by two Jewish sisters, in Sweden, whom he became very fond of. However, in the years leading up to war in 1939 he realised that anti-Semitism could bring him much wealth and power, which he was unable to resist so he went along with the movement. Do you think that there would be many other people throughout history who would have changed what they believe for wealth, career, and prestige? Priests who don’t believe in God, Atheists who don’t believe in Atheism etc? Think about it…..?

refusing debate is weakness, if their wrong, there is no better opportunity to expose it

You cannot debate a person that believes in fairy tales and refuses logic.

@colepriceguitar1153

Жыл бұрын

You mean the fairytales that animals floated hundreds of miles on rafts to get from place to place?

@DocReasonable

Жыл бұрын

@@colepriceguitar1153 As opposed to Noah's Ark? M0r0n.

@colepriceguitar1153

Жыл бұрын

@@DocReasonable it makes more sense than some evolutionary theories.

@DocReasonable

Жыл бұрын

@@colepriceguitar1153 There's only ONE evolution theory, jackazz.

@colepriceguitar1153

Жыл бұрын

@@DocReasonable there’s different theories within evolutionary theory. Like how animals got deposited in different locations.

He doesn’t because he always loses 😂

@Hayk101

4 жыл бұрын

Karl Pagan Lol watch ur language kid 😂 he madddd

@Hayk101

4 жыл бұрын

Karl Pagan I don’t watch it if u call me names 😂😂 y u do butt hurt kid did I blaspheme ur religious leader 😂😂

The real reason why is that he doesn't want to get destroyed by another John Lennox.

Profiteer pure and simple. In truth he doesn't want anyone to change their mind. Just like a good politician from any party. Don't be played folks.

@Mid-American

2 жыл бұрын

Got that right!!!! He goes around rehearsed "debating" to sell books to his groupies.

Come on now, if it’s really that clear that your right then you would obviously debate them. Let me ask you this, if 100 people watch a Flat earther vs scientist debate, and only 10 of the viewers are flat earthers, after the video are there going to be more that 10 viewers that are flat earthers?

@MDK2_Radio

2 жыл бұрын

That’s silly reasoning. People who believe in creationism like it because it’s simple. People who push it know how to use manipulation to score points with impressionable viewers because society has a distrust of authority other than spiritual authority. Yes, they probably would win more converts in spite being factually wrong because it’s much harder to convince the undecided with complex but sound evolution than with simple and emotionally appealing creationism, which holds that God made you because he loves you so much, whereas the truth is that we’re microbes in the universe where nothing but others like us care.

@Stormrocker

2 жыл бұрын

@@MDK2_Radio Science actually got traction in the U.S. from Christians if you research it honestly, but that's your whole problem.

This. I have said it for years. Giving science deniers (that cetainly includes creationists) "equal time" simply validates their unsupportable "beliefs." There is no compelling reason to do so, nor is it beneficial in the long run to continue to act as if their fantasies are possible reality.

@Oldman43674

11 ай бұрын

Creationism and science are 100% compatible and complementary in their essence. Always have been. The dichotomy is a fiction of the post-modernists meant to destroy social mores and values. It's a shibboleth of the left.

@DoomguyIsGrinningAtYou.

11 ай бұрын

Best start setting up some re-education camps and start stuffing them up with those who refuse to kneel to your fantastic intellect.

@King76oh

10 ай бұрын

We don't deny science. We reject the lies that are mixed in with the truth. They say that dinosaurs were extinct about 40 million years before man came. Then how is it possible for human tracks to be found with dinosaur tracks? How would people from 2000 bc know what dinosaurs looked like? They have drawings of them on rocks, pottery, armor, shields, boats, and coins. They have in detail what the dinosaurs looked like (there would be no way to know how dinosaurs looked or what color their skin was) Here's another tid bit that makes no sense whatsoever. They say that a bird hatched out of a dinosaur egg, there's no physical evidence of this, there's just a lack of fossil evidence to show the supposed evolution from dinosaur to bird. So they say evolution happened so fast that a bird popped out of a dinosaur egg (now that is just plain bologna) How about cavemen, where are the millions of cavemen that lived 100 thousand years ago? We can't find them. And according to scientific timelines, they were on the Earth longer than modern humans. We should be able to find at least a few million of them. We can barely find bits and pieces of them. Donald Johanson only found a few pieces of "Lucy" yet they are even able to tell what Lucy's husband looked like (that's impossible) by her bones. And some of Lucy's bones were found miles apart from each other. Conveniently as his funding was running out.

This is the same reason top contenders don't fight bums. They don't want them getting a payday they haven't earned

He doesn't debate creationists because it's a waste of time, he may as well debate a 3 year old.

It’s similar to when my dad used to say “I will not even dignify that remark with an answer”

@CeramicShot

3 жыл бұрын

@Luigi DeNardis No. He explained pretty clearly that it's like a geographer willing to give a platform to a flat-Earther and have an open debate in public. All it would accomplish is giving coverage to someone whose point of view is not worth presenting to the a wide audience. Evolution and speciation are uncontroversial among scientists and laypeople who've matured out of belief in virgin births, talking snakes, and the persistence of consciousness after death. And by the way, when you end a comment with "Period." all it accomplishes is to show that you're not willing to entertain other points of view, the mark of a closed-minded person blinkered into believing absurdities for emotional reasons.

@philcross8561

3 жыл бұрын

@Luigi DeNardis it would appear that you've never heard Richard Dawkins speak otherwise you would not question his belief in his argument or his ability to deliver it. We only have a finite amount of time on the planet and it's pointless to waste that time on people who prefer to hold dogmatic adherence to the supposed merits of the system regardless oh how logical and forceful your argument may be.

@sartori69

3 жыл бұрын

@Luigi DeNardis There's nothing academically sound about creationism. Therefore, as everyone is re-stating, debating them is literally pointless.

@sartori69

3 жыл бұрын

@Luigi DeNardis Nah, was already poisoned by prideful ignorance, gullibility, and indoctrination in the name of a bronze age storybook.

@sartori69

3 жыл бұрын

@Luigi DeNardis Nah, coming from an atheist it's rightfully skeptical, logical, and rational. All the shit you can label "rich" as a perjorative have been coming out of various religions for thousands of years across the planet. Enjoy the kool aid.

*Hi guys! This comment section needs to be fixed. let me take care of it.*

@Conan-Le-Cimmerien

11 сағат бұрын

It was fine before you came along.

"Why Richard Dawkins Doesn't Debate Creationists?" Because eventually he will have to face someone like me.

@drsatan7554

2 жыл бұрын

What's so good about you?

I once had a debate with a friend when we were off the coast fishing. We were getting no bites so we started a debate. He said the sun is in fact a meat pie with sauce, I said What? He said no seriously a meat pie with sauce. I said the sun is hot..so is my pie he retorted, I said It is our source of light I said...I have sauce on my pie he quipped. Getting annoyed I said the sun is round! And he said and smartie what is the formula for a circle?

Arguing with a creationist is like trying to convince a 5 year old that he can't have ice cream for dessert.

@atheism-themoststupidrelig8802

14 сағат бұрын

*Absolutely beautiful, from Dawkins:* _if you look at the details of biochemistry, molecular biology, you might find a signature of some sort of designer._ 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

He should stick to his mediocre films. This evolution thing is too taxing on his brain

Actually he debated Prof John Lennox... he was roasted!

@hwd7

3 жыл бұрын

Dawkins got roasted Twice!

No bullshit. If you are right and can prove it you should have no trouble debating anyone

@logicalatheist1065

3 жыл бұрын

He doesn't...

He doesn't debate with creationists because they are obviously not well. All you 'Believers' please can I ask you this? Dictionary definitions; ----------------------------------------------------------------------- delusion dɪˈl(j)uːʒ(ə)n/Submit noun an idiosyncratic belief or impression maintained despite being contradicted by reality or rational argument, typically as a symptom of mental disorder. ------------------------------------------------------- faith [feyth] Show IPA noun belief that is not based on proof: -------------------------------------------------------------- Whats the difference?

@michaeltagg492

10 жыл бұрын

***** I believe I don't know, but I know I will not believe in a 'God' that was envisaged by a load of primitive cultures that had very little comprehension of the real world

@ricksanchez9288

6 жыл бұрын

Michael Tagg Well put. Brilliant! I don't think there is a difference.

@atheism-themoststupidrelig8802

15 сағат бұрын

*Speaking about delusions, take this from Dawkins, rtrd.* _if you look at the details of biochemistry, molecular biology, you might find a signature of some sort of designer._

Stork theory! That made my day! One of the most admired scientists by me. Yes, you are aggressive, but your message is clear as starphire. And your arguments are there for grabs. Why oh why is everyone just standing by the dying body and shouting the king is not naked?

@atheism-themoststupidrelig5703

17 сағат бұрын

*Absolutely beautiful, from Dawkins:* _if you look at the details of biochemistry, molecular biology, you might find a signature of some sort of designer._ 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

He's completely right... I choose the other method of winning any argument with a religious person. Simply tell them they're right and I'm wrong - is there anything else you would like to talk about?

Richard Dawkins refuses to debate Kent Hovind. I would love to see that debate happen. I think he needs to grow some and debate Hovind.

@JFrazer4303

5 жыл бұрын

Debate a moron and the moron and his followers who are like him stuck in their own Dunning-Kruger effect, suddenly think that everyone thinks they're smart. Hovind is a charlatan.

*Simply beautiful and deep one from the great Newton, with much love:* _He must be blind who does not immediately see in the perfect and wise arrangement of beings, the infinite wisdom and goodness of the almighty Creator, and 'idiot' he who does not confess Him_

@Conan-Le-Cimmerien

11 сағат бұрын

So things are complex and simpletons don't understand that intelligent designer don't make complex things, they make them simple, so they believe in a god of their own making. Sounds about right!

@atheism-themoststupidrelig5703

6 сағат бұрын

@@Conan-Le-Cimmerien *Sorry if Newton made u mad, b-allet dancer Eldridge. By the way, u insisted that ostriches have no wings, but my question is: have u ever seen an ostrich?* 😂😂😂

@Conan-Le-Cimmerien

38 минут бұрын

​@@atheism-themoststupidrelig5703 Sorry that reality to hard for you to grasp so you invented yourself a god, that was a lazy way out so I decided to use my brain and now I'm an atheist. P.S:I am sure you tons of evidence of me saying that ostriches have no wings, you're not the type to lie to just save face, right Larsen?

I can't believe he compares creationists to the equivalent of flat earth's. That's why he won't debate with them? There are many renowned creationist scientists, and he treats them with no respect as if they aren't scientists at all. What complete ignorance. Creationists are willing to debate with evolutionists and treat them with equal respect, even if we think evolution is preposterous.

@elizabethposekany4944

3 жыл бұрын

Both Creationists and flat earthers are required to deny scientific theories, whether it is the Theory of Relativity for flat earthers or evolution for creationists. I personally think flat earthers are crazier but both require a lot of evidence denial.

@braedynhoward3644

3 жыл бұрын

@@elizabethposekany4944 I see no evidence of evolution. That's where many people are wrong. The earth has been proven a million times, even since ancient times, to have been a sphere, whereas evolution is a worldview, just as creationism is. That's why it's not a fair comparison. We have the same evidence, different assumptions. I see no scientific validity in a theory (really a hypothesis with no proof) saying that genetic information is gained through mutations (which goes against basic biology) and that all life came from some random cell (again not plausible) that randomly generated from non living matter (life cannot come form non life) that came from nothing (which is impossible), and somehow evolved everything it needs to work together (all the systems in the body) separately, somehow. XD. That is scientifically not true, if you study biology or physics. The law of entropy also contradicts evolution. All of those things I listed are opposite of what science shows us about life and the world around us. It also fails to explain our conscience and out spiritual side which is NOT physical, or why we have morals, as well as the fact that evolution promotes racism. Charles Darwin was a radical racist, because of the time he lived in, as well as his worldview confirming it. In my opinion, evolution is a crazy hypothesis, which is somehow now considered "science", which is a cheap attempt to simply eliminate God, an intelligent designer, from the story. Everything we see today in biology and physics and entropy, is given a clear and scientifically provable answer in the Bible. One being that all the kinds reproduce after their kinds, they did not "evolve".

@elizabethposekany4944

3 жыл бұрын

@@braedynhoward3644 It really shouldnt be up for debate that Evolution has nearly insurmountable evidence, the fact that it is a scientific theory along the ranks of the theory of gravity shows how well substantiated it is. It appears that there isnt much else to discuss when there is such a gap in scientific literacy here, im not blaming you for that of course, and do not mean that as an insult at all. It is more just disappointing due to how far we have come as a society to still allow these non scientific ideas to be indoctrinated into our youth.

@braedynhoward3644

3 жыл бұрын

@@elizabethposekany4944 Prove that it has insurmountable evidence when science goes against the basics of evolution. I'm sorry, it's a worldview difference, not science.

@elizabethposekany4944

3 жыл бұрын

@@braedynhoward3644 I get that you were taught that, but virtually every time scientists have tested evolution, whether it is through geology, paleontology, anthropology, etc, it has failed to disprove evolution while also casting serious doubts if not fully disproving events that the bible claims to have happened like the flood. I dont know if you believe in the flood but to my knowledge, most creationists do.

At 1:55 what theory is he talking about? I can't seem to find it on Google.

So true. When a large planet interacts with a small planet. The bigger one loses massive energy while the small one gains a large dose of that energy.

Richard Dawkins is the best, I could listen to him talk all day.

@alexanderstephen1567

3 жыл бұрын

He has talent and charm in speaking, I give him that, but don`t let yourself fooled. Pay attention to the words, not his charm in speaking. He is speaking about the mechanisms of the natural world but never, NEVER anyone explained from where is this mechanism, what caused it, what made it to work on this way. He is speaking about the self replicated cell, but no one ever explained from where is this self replicated cell. He is speaking about design that we can observe in nature but never explain why design? He knows about consciousness but doesn`t have a clue what this is or from where it is. Others speaking about Big-Bang, but no one ever explained what caused it. There are so BIG crucially important questions that are in total darkness and everybody seems to be happy with only a theory of an evolution proposed by a group of evolutionists... The Origin of the Universe The Origin of Life --- these two are unknown

@kevinreynolds3594

3 жыл бұрын

Alexander Stephen according to religion those questions are not unknown. Dawkins will openly say that he doesn’t know, theists will make extraordinary claims and provide no evidence.

@allanliang9072

2 жыл бұрын

@@kevinreynolds3594 I don’t think that ignorance is justified by humility.

@kevinreynolds3594

2 жыл бұрын

@@allanliang9072 your response makes literally no sense

@Rich7714

2 жыл бұрын

@@alexanderstephen1567 He has already said that if you postulate a god to answer the questions you just put forward, you set yourself up for an even larger problem, because now you have to explain how a god just suddenly appeared magically into existence from no where with infinite power/knowledge etc. This is one of the No.1 issues that a religious person has never been able to answer. The best they can do is say "You can't ask that question".

"That would look great on your CV, not so good on mine" I liked that.

@atheism-themoststupidrelig5703

17 сағат бұрын

*Absolutely beautiful one from Newton, with much love:* _a-theism is so s-enseless and o-dious to mankind_ 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

Tonight’s debate topic: “Should creationism be debated?”

@philaypeephilippotter6532

3 жыл бұрын

What about _creationism _*_could_* be debated?

@logicalatheist1065

3 жыл бұрын

@@philaypeephilippotter6532 I don't see how a fictional world view is worth debating

@ElfHostage

3 жыл бұрын

@@logicalatheist1065 shit all over my joke, will you.

@logicalatheist1065

3 жыл бұрын

@@ElfHostage :D Creationism IS the joke and yours was successful

It is comical the way people applause him as if they absolutely believe him. There is no way to absolutely know the origin of life. Even Dawkins admits that they don't have all of the answers.

HAVE YOU STUDIED A WELL MADE BA NA NA

Why not debate a flat earther? I'd want to see where it went :D

@usul573

10 жыл бұрын

I've heard them talk, it's just mind numbingly dull and annoying.

@usul573

10 жыл бұрын

This doesn't take a genius to find. Just google the flat earth society, their website, their interview, go for it.

@vincentvongoy3490

10 жыл бұрын

Listen, I feel that if you debate a flat earther, you're only sharpening your debate skills, helping you to remember certain people like Ernest Shackleton or Amelia Earhart, Isaac Newton and Galileo Galilae.

@usul573

10 жыл бұрын

I honestly hope you are correct.

@BartAlder

5 жыл бұрын

If you really want to sharpen your debating skills you should debate someone who can actually debate and you should debate them on a topic which is actually up for debate. You don't sharpen your chess skills by playing chess against two year olds and you don't sharpen your debating skills by debating idiots on absolute nonsense.

He doesn't do it because he knows he can't win

@mathewimmanuel9137

2 жыл бұрын

Amen

@JoshuaTheEmoKid

2 жыл бұрын

Lmao you guys are so boring

@leogard8396

2 жыл бұрын

@@JoshuaTheEmoKid Not like they have anything else to do in their dull lives

@logicalatheist1065

2 жыл бұрын

You just have to show up and breathe to best a Creationist in a debate, they'll dog themselves into a hole, you won't have to do anything

“Doesn’t debate opposing views.” Sounds like a strong intellectual

6 жыл бұрын

Creationists are no different than flat earthers.

@christopherparks4342

6 жыл бұрын

The debate has been over for years. At this point they arent people with opposing views, they're just wrong.

@loganleatherman7647

2 жыл бұрын

Debating people who are certain of their position but have no actual evidence to back it up is as futile as any exercise gets

*Meanwhile the undeniable evidence of an intelligent creator found in DNA simply crushes Aronra's cult. Even Dawkins admitted it, I quote him:* _if you look at the details of biochemistry, molecular biology, you might find a signature of some sort of designer._ 😂😂😂😂😂😂

@Conan-Le-Cimmerien

12 сағат бұрын

Yeah, that's an undeniable evidence of your mine-quoting and your lack of understanding of genetics, which surprises nobody.

@atheism-themoststupidrelig5703

6 сағат бұрын

@@Conan-Le-Cimmerien *Sorry if Dawkins made u mad, b-allet dancer Eldridge.* 😂😂😂

@Conan-Le-Cimmerien

47 минут бұрын

​@@atheism-themoststupidrelig5703 Sorry to call out your dishonesty, I'm just too honest to let you spew BS.

*Simply beautiful and motivational this one from Kelvin:* _The atheistic idea is so n-onsensical that I do not see how I can put it in words._ 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

@Conan-Le-Cimmerien

12 сағат бұрын

Even if Kelvin really said that he also said that physics was over and all that was left were more accurate measurements. Not the most brilliant take, even you are forced to agree.

@atheism-themoststupidrelig5703

6 сағат бұрын

@@Conan-Le-Cimmerien *Sorry if Kelvin made u mad, b-allet dancer Eldridge.* 😂😂😂

@Conan-Le-Cimmerien

42 минут бұрын

​@@atheism-themoststupidrelig5703 I humbly apologize for being smarter than you and having actual understanding of what counts as actual evidence and what doesn't. As for you, doesn't it make you mad that Lord Kelvin got so much wrong? Does it make you mad that we don't remember Kelvin for his faith but for his work on thermodynamics? Well it must makes you mad but it sure makes sense.

I mean it disagree solely on grounds that a vast majority of the population believes in the creation myth. We need to spend some time an effort attempting to educate the population through debate. If a majority of people believe the earth is flat we would need to explain why it's not. Right ?

Scientific propositions can only be debated between scientists who know what the proposition is about in detail and how it's supported by evidence. Both sides need to present research results to support the claims they make. The claims presented must be falsifiable claims and both claimants need to be prepared (willing) to change their minds. The study into creation and creationists themselves do not adhere to any of the above standards, so debating creationists becomes absolutely pointless.

"It may be good on your cv , not so good on mine" : he nailed it .

“If you were a geographer. Would you like to debate with a flat earther?”. No, absolutely not. It makes a joke out of science.

@cameronvandevelde4186

Жыл бұрын

okay so if you think that Richard debating a creationist is like debating a "flat-earther", what does he have to lose? absoutely nothing, if he's so cocky and arrogant that he will destroy a creationist in a debate!! and Richard also said another time at a conference he was in that he will be willing to debate any religious leaders like a priest, bishop, pope, etc. BUT NOT creationists....and his reasoning for that time was because he's not going to debate creationists because their "only" rise to fame is by being a "professional" debator and how Richard has a busy schedule?!?! like what??? so let me get this straight, Dawkins does have the "time" in his busy schedule to debate religious leaders BUT DOES NOT have the "time" in his schedule to debate creationists?!?! What a hyprocite Dawkins is....smh

@markusbaker1161

Жыл бұрын

@@cameronvandevelde4186 🤣 that’s all I have to say for you.

@cameronvandevelde4186

Жыл бұрын

@@markusbaker1161 haha okay and I can guarantee you this, a creationist can even make an offer of $1K to debate Dawkins and give $1K to Dawkins as a free gift to debate him for 2 hrs. Dawkins can make $500 a hour for 2 hours and Dawkins will still say no….and I still wouldn’t be surprised Dawkins still says no to a $5K (making $2.5K an hour) or even a $10K (making $5K an hour) offer

@markusbaker1161

Жыл бұрын

@@cameronvandevelde4186 who cares lol

@GabrielEmerald777

Жыл бұрын

@@cameronvandevelde4186 Dawkins is a comedian. His arguments are nothing more than unscientific fallacies. Dawkins isn't a hypocrite but a coward that knows he can't refute ID or Creationist arguments based on science.

How can a theory be a fact….A theory is a theory and a fact is a fact….?

Was this before or after he debated all those creationists?

I love that Ray Comfort is simply known as "the Banana Man" in the modern world.

@RockOrgan

2 жыл бұрын

@@tobiasplyter6137 fax

I see all these debates going on in the comments and think, dd these fools not get what he was saying in the video? Stop 'debating' with people who don't understand what a debate even is.

Dawkins doesn't even understand basic concepts in Philosophy and Religion. So what difference does it make?

You, of all people, know the complexities of infinity?

because in most cases its a waste of time. I would love for every single creationist in the world to take an astronomy class. I am in one right now, before I thought I was smart at believing in science and results, after the first class I started to realize why its the right thing to believe in, but most importantly it makes me humble to know how insignificant we really are to the universe, and how ignorant.

@gordonwaldner9792

7 жыл бұрын

Many Phd astronomers are Christians. Look up and listen to Hugh Ross Phd.

@LarJgrip

6 жыл бұрын

Mau PS Ignorant indeed, science still can’t explain how it is that we have a moon. Never mind the hard stuff.

@chiefchimchar

5 жыл бұрын

I have taken an astronomy class, and I'm still a firm believer. Even more of a believer now than I ever was, in fact.

@tellaaalli

5 жыл бұрын

This thread is the most refreshing one.

@mrcurly1147

5 жыл бұрын

@@chiefchimchar So those specks of light in the night sky are just holes in the firmament then?

The real truth is, Dawkins knows he will lose the debate, because he thinks he came from a rock!

@leogard8396

2 жыл бұрын

Creationists also think they came from nothing, since god came from nothing. will atheism is content with the fact that we may never know, theists like to believe that they do know.

@vryafoat777

Жыл бұрын

Didn't god make the first person from clay?

I noticed reading The God Delusion that Richard Dawkins refers to the “Australian Creationist”. Christians do see him as arrogant and this can be a stumbling block, Creationism is there, you cannot deny it and if he wants to win people to his views he needs to debate the best ones...

@dimitris_zaha

5 жыл бұрын

@Giant Scorpion of the Apocalypse these retards are smarter than you kid lol

How do you get a Creationist to lie? Get them to defend their beliefs

@jockmactaggart6068

3 жыл бұрын

Now your just playing the hypocrite

@jockmactaggart6068

3 жыл бұрын

Who invented the big bang theory???You see religion is at the heart of all matters...

@logicalatheist1065

3 жыл бұрын

@@jockmactaggart6068 who coined the term big bang? Is that what you're trying to say? Big bang is just the expansion of the universe... It's based off observations...

@logicalatheist1065

3 жыл бұрын

@@jockmactaggart6068 how am I a hypocrite?

@logicalatheist1065

3 жыл бұрын

@@tobiasplyter6137 if they are facts, they wouldn't be beliefs...

It's like arguing with a drunk, they drag you into a gutter of misinformation and illogic where they have a clear advantage. The best response is to pat them on the head and say, "Our Department of Comparative Religions or someone who deals with ancient myths would be more suited to discussing your stories, I only deal with scientific research."

@allanliang9072

2 жыл бұрын

I would like you to use science when arguing with your wife. From personal experience this evening, as an ardent supporter of reason and free research, I can say that it did not work. Perhaps more dialogues with creationists will actually help us acquire skills needed to engage in not so rational conversations which will surely come up in life. The mature attitude is to accept that life isn’t all that rational and deal with it. Let’s make the most out of our opportunities shall we? Good day sir

The only debate that counts is the one on the battlefield. Those that believe that god is on their side without having any type of scientific advantage will meet their maker a whole lot sooner than they expect, and the sad truth is not only will he not be there, neither will they.

thanks to people lioe richerd,christopher hitchens, i was able to overcome catholic childhood brainwashing ! I owe my new life of living without remorse,fear ,guilt and shame to these extraordinary people ......thanks Richard

Wow this guy is so proud and doesn't even realize how little he knows

@atheism-themoststupidrelig8802

14 сағат бұрын

*Absolutely beautiful, from Dawkins:* _if you look at the details of biochemistry, molecular biology, you might find a signature of some sort of designer._ 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂