Hello my friend. I enjoyed watching your video today 🎉 You are amazing and I love your channel ❤

Amen, the truth prevails!

Thank you Mia for all the facts and words of the Dear Lord...you are a true prophet! Love YOU BABY GIRL.❤❤❤🙏🙏🙏

Sister you're on fire 🔥 keep going sister

Amen. Mia your videos are always encouraging and uplifting.

Jesus is King of kings ❤️

Kudos, Dear Sis-in-the-SAVIOR! You are appreciated! #Bible #Historical #Reliable #Trustworthy #Inerrant #Inspired #LifeGiving

Your eyes are seriously so pretty

Thank you Mia❤

Amen continue To spread the word you’re doing amazing, don’t let anybody try to tell you different because you’re doing incredible. Continue to save all of the lost souls and encourage others to follow Jesus Christ as their Lord and Savior. God bless you and your entire family. I pray to see you in the clouds when the time comes.

This is amazing! I've always believed The Bible and I learned soooo much verification of The Truth. I'm a researcher and validity and reliability are needed as proof, as you described. Amen! 🙏

Amen

Thank for yours explications! ❤

Good summary.

Thanks!

Amen Mia 🙏🏾

the Bible is ALIVE

Good video Mia! Greetings from Argentina!

It's good to do our hobbies, it's good for our minds and soul. It also helps to get our minds off this stupid, pathetic life we all live in. Have a blessed day everyone! Almost got my power washing all done. I have a ton of brick and concrete around here, it's taking me a long time, plus I have chronic spondylosis in my lower back and Neck, so I have to take a bunch of breaks. I'm a lot slower on my projects cause I'm forced to take breaks all the time. If I refuse breaks and just keep going the pain just keeps getting worse and worse and I'll eventually vomit cause of it. So, anyways. Life is different. But it's still nice to exsit cause I know the future is going to be incredible, it's beyond our imagination, On what Jesus has in store for us believers. This sinful, broken world is in its last days. I'm looking forward to my new glorified body. No more aches and pains....so, just carry on and make the best out of this stupid little life. It is what it is. Just know this dispensation is almost over. Go enjoy your stupid Lil life. And keep Jesus in it. He wants to be apart of our/your life. It's very important the unbelievers accepts Jesus and what he did for us....he shed blood. And his precious blood washed our sins away as white as snow.....THANK YOU JESUS!!!!..... Jesus don't know unbelievers till they accept him and what he did....there's times where God the father turns Jesus's ears off guy.... Just get saved now... 1st Corinthians 15-1-4 Go Enjoy this stupid Lil life. Okay. Have a super awesome day. Bye

❤❤❤

🙏🏻❤🙏🏻❤🙏🏻

Miss your videos Mia❤

Jesus Christ conquers ❤

Mia is ggorgeous ❤

Very little of what you say here is either true, or supported by the data. And I mean very little? More errors here than in any video I've ever read actually. 1. "Written down by eyewitnesses". We don't actually know who wrote the Gospels because the authors don't tell us. They're written in the 3rd person, in a different language than Jesus preached in, in highly literate Koine Greek, and 30-70 years after Jesus died (a lifetime or more). Many many good reasons to conclude they were not written by the people whose names appear, and were very likely to be added in the second half of the second century. Prior to that, the earliest church father quoted from the often, but never once called them by the names we have today. Not until the end of the 2nd century. And they copy freely from each other in the Gospels. Most of Mark (the earliest Gospel) is copied almost word for word in Matthew and Luke. Odd for eyewitnesses? For example, Matthew copied the story of how he personally met Jesus from the Gospel of Mark (not an eyewitness). Very hard to understand if Matthew was written by Matthew? The names are church tradition and not history. Like much of what you've said here? 2. "Written where the events took place. So it was subject to scrutiny and correction". The Gospels were most likely written in or around Rome. Again, by highly educated Greek speaking people. Not illiterate fishermen as the Bible tells us they were. Only the very wealthy could read and right in Koine Greek at the time. So even if they were written in the area, the eyewitnesses could not have read them. Not to mention there were very very few copies at the time, and which were written decades after Jesus died. 3. "The eyewitnesses were tortured, persecuted and put to death ...and never did they recant". There is no evidence of this beyond later church tradition. Certainly on the recant part, and even for the put to death part. With the possible exception of Paul (not an eyewitness) and maybe Peter. Nothing in the Bible or recorded history. This is almost entirely church tradition. Read Shaun McDowells book on this. 4. "First century non-Christian historians...corroborate the claims about Jesus..including his deity, death, burial, and resurrection. It's all throughout 1st century non-Christian writings". The only part of this that's true is that he died by crucifixion under Pontias Pilot. None of the other things you listed are mentioned. Anywhere. I'm not sure where you got this idea? The closest is the passage "Testimonium Falvianum" added to Josephus book 18 probably in the 9th century by later Christians. The only non-christian historian references mention that he lived and died. 5; "The text we have today is an accurate representation of what the original authors wrote". Except where it has been changed and added to? I mean the ending of the Gospel of Mark was added hundreds of years later, the story of the woman taken in adultery was added hundred of years later, the specific reference to the Holy Trinity in John was added hundreds of years later. And that's just what we know of from the earliest manuscripts that have survived? Which are hundreds of years after the originals. Look, I'm not saying Jesus wasn't the son of God, died and resurrected. Or that the Gospels are not the inspired word of God through men. But that's a matter of faith and not history. If you try and make it history and fact, then you're going to be proven wrong time and time again by actual Biblical scholars and historians. Please be careful making claims like you do here, because much of it so easily proven not to be historically true. Sorry. No theological or religious judgements here at all, so don't get me wrong. Purely historical scholarship and textual Biblical study only.

@User-gi9te

2 ай бұрын

It is to be historically true, it was written in documents and 5’000 eye witnesses of Jesus Christ resurrection, and there are over 25,000 manuscripts of his death.

@nickbrasing8786

2 ай бұрын

@@User-gi9te All religious texts are "written in documents". For many different Gods. And we don't have 5'000 eyewitness written accounts of Jesus resurrection. We have at most 2 or 3. And likely only one. Only one of which claims that 500 more saw the risen Jesus. Claims are not evidence, they're claims. I doubt you would apply to same logic to other religious texts? Do you think many dead rose out of their graves when Jesus died and wandered around ancient Jerusalem and appeared to many people? When absolutely no one other than Matthew thought to record this? Not even Josephus? "and there are over 25,000 manuscripts of his death" That someone died is not miraculous. But 25,000? No, there are over 5,000 manuscripts of the NT in Greek. The rest are later Latin or other languages. With most of them simply copies over 1,000 years later. Hardly "eyewitness testimony"? In the first century? None. Zero. In the second century? Less than half a dozen fragments of sentences. And maybe 20 fragments from the 3rd century. The overwhelming majority of these come from over 800 years after Jesus died. Hardly good evidence of his resurrection? You're being told what you want to hear it seems to me, by people that want to tell you what you want to hear. And hope you don't look into it. Look, you can totally keep your faith by just believing they were all inspired by the Holy Spirit. No problem with that. But you can't make historical claims, without historical evidence. Not for the Bible, not for the Koran, not for the Bhagavad Gita, and not for Roman or Egyptian Gods. History is history, and faith is faith. Two different things?

@toyafan

Ай бұрын

​@@User-gi9tedid u ignore ops point of only rich people having the luxury to read or understand text 😭

Gullibility.

Abû Hurairah (may Allâh be pleased with him) reported: Messenger of Allâh Muhammed (pbuh) said, "By the One in Whose Hand my soul is, were you not to commit sins, Allâh would replace you with a people who would commit sins and then seek forgiveness from Allâh; and Allâh would forgive them." [Muslim] Riyad Us Saliheen. Volume 1. Page 390, Hadith Number 422. [Commentary: This Hadîth also tells us that Allâh has a profound liking for such people who are penitent and seek pardon for their sins from Him. So much so that if such people cease to exist who neither commit sins nor seek pardon from Him, He will create people who will do so. It does not, however, mean that He likes sins or the sinful persons. What it really means is that He likes penitence and the penitents. This is the true purport of this Hadîth. It also means that it is natural for man to commit sins, and that Allâh loves whenever a slave commits a sin to rush and beg for His forgiveness].

@Sahih_al-Bukhari_2658

Ай бұрын

This is exactly what Paul was talking about in Romans 6:1-2, ‘What shall we say, then? Shall we go on sinning so that grace may increase? By no means!…’ (NIV) It’s disgusting the holy and maximally great being beyond praise, Allah, *wants* you to sin, which by definition is doing morally wrong. From white lies to raype. Disgusting. Except that’s not a sin in Islam (Quran 4:24). In a hypothetical world, Allah would rather humans do evil than perfectly obey his holy laws. How is Islam supposed to answer the problem of evil with this admission? In Christianity, sin is what caused God’s relationship with Adam to break and which needed Jesus to come on earth.

@Sahih_al-Bukhari_2658

Ай бұрын

Speaking of the atonement, can you explain Sahih Muslim 7014 means? ‘Abu Burda reported Allah's Messenger as saying: There would come people amongst the Muslims on the Day of Resurrection with…sins…and Allah would forgive them and He would place in their stead the *Jews* and the *Christians.’* (See also: Sahih Muslim 2767 d) Is this woman going to be substituted for you on judgement day because she’s worse than animaIs? (Quran 98:6) It’s ironic how Muslims say Jesus being crucified for our sins is unjust etc with hadiths like these.

*Allah Said:* And who does more wrong than the one who invents a lie against Allah, while he is being invited to Islam? And Allah guides not the people who are Zalimun (polytheists, wrong-doers and disbelievers) folk. They intend to put out the Light of Allah (i.e. the Religion of Islam, this Qur'an, and the Prophet Muhammad صلى الله عليه وسلم) with their mouths. But Allah will bring His Light to perfection even though the disbelievers hate (it). He it is Who has sent His Messenger (Muhammad صلى الله عليه وسلم) with guidance and the religion of truth (Islamic Monotheism) to make it victorious over all (other) religions even though the Mushrikun (polytheists, pagans, idolaters, and disbelievers in the Oneness of Allah and in His Messenger Muhammad صلى الله عليه وسلم) hate (it). *Qur'an Surah 61, Verses 7 - 9.* *Translated by, Al-Hilali and Muhsin Khan, ( The Noble Qur'an ).* *Published by, Sajed Munir.*

@Sahih_al-Bukhari_2658

Ай бұрын

And how does Allah plan to make Islam win over others? The same chapter of these verses say, Quran 61:4 ‘Allah loves those who fight in His Cause in *battle* array…’ 61:11 That ye believe in Allah…and that ye strive (your utmost) in the Cause of Allah, with your property and your persons…’ (Yusuf Ali trans.) As history shows, Islam only prevailed because it resorted to violence. Muhammad brought no proof for Islam. Jews, Christians even pagans didn’t fall for his lies. So how did Muhammad convince people to fight for him? As Quran 61:12 says, by offering eternal life for doing it for him. He also offered 70 wives in Jannah (heaven) for it. You can see Muhammad seducing his followers this way in Sahih al-Bukhari 2796.

@Sahih_al-Bukhari_2658

Ай бұрын

The last verse of Quran 61 says, ‘Jesus…[said] to the Disciples, "Who will be my helpers to (the work of) Allah?" Said the disciples, "We are Allah's helpers!" then a portion of the Children of Israel believed…We gave power to those who believed, against their enemies, and they became the ones that prevailed.’ (Yusuf Ali trans.) How did Christianity prevail? Despite being oppressed by their enemies, they peacefully spread the gospel: Jesus, the Son of God is Lord & king who died for sins and resurrected. (1 Cor 15:1-8) Which is what early Christians believed, and non Christians describe Jesus & Christianity as. And they converted the Roman Empire. Meanwhile ironically, the ‘religion of peace’ (Islam) couldn’t rely on Muhammad’s truth & spread with violence. Jesus’ disciples and their followers simply relied on the truth of the gospel to convert. They even did miracles to prove their claims (Matt. 4:24, Acts 5:12-39, 19:11-12 etc.) *If* *Muhammad* *never* *used* *violence,* *all* *Arabia* *would* *already* *be* *Christian.*

Amen