Nitpicking, but -You skipped the Afsharid Dynasty under Nader Shah who took a large chunk of Persian caucasian territory back from the Russians. -At 7:53 this is the Qajar Dynasty, not the Afsharid Dynasty -At 10:43 This is the picture of Mohammadreza Shah (his son and heir), not Reza Shah otherwise an "allright" oversimplified summary of 500 years of Russo-Persian conflicts in the caucasus

@adolfojuangarcia1906

24 күн бұрын

You really know your stuff.

@asahel980

24 күн бұрын

not just in this video, to be honest almost all of the video of this channel has ignored vital parts and some mistakes in information and geography.

@user-zi8bd7zp2f

23 күн бұрын

All Iranians know their proud history

@maximilianrobespierre8365

23 күн бұрын

hear hear

@adamradziwill

20 күн бұрын

russia is a 18c fake construction, the original name of this mongol empire is Muscovy

Taking Iran would mean warm water ports. They were interested but it isn't an easy country to take.

@cyrusthegreat982

24 күн бұрын

He completely overlooked this crucial fact

@Andre-by4su

24 күн бұрын

It was pretty easy during ww2

@donrog5035

24 күн бұрын

At what cost ? Even if they conquered Persia they will be so weakened by it that they wouldn't be able to hold those conquest. You don't just conquer and occupied another big empire for just warm water ports.

@maxthetube8466

24 күн бұрын

In the late 1800s they could have easily conquered it but if you actually knew geopolitics the uk didn’t want that as it threatened india

@cyrusthegreat982

24 күн бұрын

@@maxthetube8466 So they couldn't and they didn't

Btw you mistakingly put the afsharids after the Qajars which is wrong the Qajars came after the afsharids

@tonyantonio8956

23 күн бұрын

U r wrong 😂😂😂 Go google it, babu 😂😂😂

@cynfaelalek-walker7003

23 күн бұрын

@@tonyantonio8956 dadash, I'm literally from there, Afsharids were before Qajars

@tonyantonio8956

23 күн бұрын

@@cynfaelalek-walker7003 prove it, share some link.

@rashadahmadov3929

22 күн бұрын

@@cynfaelalek-walker7003 yes, and both Azerbaijani dynasties

@cynfaelalek-walker7003

22 күн бұрын

@@rashadahmadov3929 They were Persian-turks, I don't think either had any relation to The Azeris, the Safavids make more sense cuz their origins were close to that area, still the defining part of those dynasties overall is that they were Persian

You just skipped the nader shah and how he taking back the persian territory and went to india and center asia and caucasus and ottoman borders. he was also known as persian Napoleon and last conqueror of east.

@bydlaq

24 күн бұрын

Persian Napoleon lol

@lacomplation

24 күн бұрын

he is İranian Turk not ethnically persian

@parsarustami774

24 күн бұрын

@@lacomplation so what? Napoleon wasn't French but world consider him as french. same as other conquerors and rulers.

@alirezarez7912

24 күн бұрын

Hes perso turkaman ​@@lacomplation

@parsarustami774

24 күн бұрын

@@bydlaq well your right, Napoleon wasn't even born that day. so he's just nader shah.

There were quite a few mistakes and misinformation in this video.

@user-xr7bv8cl3p

17 күн бұрын

Russia has always been a coward throughout history... during the time of Darius the Great. When Russia was attacked by the Persians, they abandoned the cities and fled. Until the weather got cold, Darius returned. During the time of Napoleon, they also fled... in During Hitler's time, he ran away... the best Russian soldier is just cold... not a brave or brave man. Just ice😂

@sidp5381

16 күн бұрын

@@user-xr7bv8cl3p Russia didn’t even exist in antiquity for you. Don’t know what you’re talking about.

@user-xr7bv8cl3p

13 күн бұрын

@@sidp5381 alll know what i am saying...just u🤣

@koboldgeorge2140

13 күн бұрын

​@@sidp5381 he's equating the ancient scythians with the russians. Territorially that's not really right, and linguistically and ethnically they were actually cousins of the Iranians. He got the narrative wrong too, Darius got his ass clapped by the scythians

@BH-gh6qm

10 күн бұрын

@@user-xr7bv8cl3p lol gj making shit up like a loser

I am glad to see video about Georgia ⚘️ here is one part of Georgia history🌷

@user-xr7bv8cl3p

17 күн бұрын

Russia has always been a coward throughout history... during the time of Darius the Great. When Russia was attacked by the Persians, they abandoned the cities and fled. Until the weather got cold, Darius returned. During the time of Napoleon, they also fled... in During Hitler's time, he ran away... the best Russian soldier is just cold... not a brave or brave man. Just ice😂

Bro act like u can just go there and conquer it. Nahhhhh 💀💀

@JesusOrDestruction

24 күн бұрын

Right? People just think conquest is a easy thing to do 💀💀

@spinxeditz5448

24 күн бұрын

Alexander did

@parsarustami774

24 күн бұрын

​@@spinxeditz5448 that was the first and last time they ever did.

@StarterOffical-Jousha-lf6ig

24 күн бұрын

Everyone gangsta until Ea Nasir conquered Mars in 1700 BCE

@ailediablo79

24 күн бұрын

​@@parsarustami774 arabs casually did it hy mistake. But Ya if Ottomans and Byzantium struggled it is a good idea to not even try. Not to mention ottomans are next door and Persia hleps them fighting ottomans.

Thanks for educating me on an area not often covered in school History lessons

@user-xr7bv8cl3p

17 күн бұрын

Russia has always been a coward throughout history... during the time of Darius the Great. When Russia was attacked by the Persians, they abandoned the cities and fled. Until the weather got cold, Darius returned. During the time of Napoleon, they also fled... in During Hitler's time, he ran away... the best Russian soldier is just cold... not a brave or brave man. Just ice

@TomsOnUK

17 күн бұрын

@@user-xr7bv8cl3p not strictly true, it’s more the way of their military command, and so far apart from perhaps the Mongols no body has successfully invaded Russia

@ibrahimsayedi9632

4 сағат бұрын

Even then, a lot of the information in this video is inaccurate. I really wish the owners of this channel would hire actual Iranian scholars because western sources always struggle with eastern history.

@TomsOnUK

3 сағат бұрын

@@ibrahimsayedi9632 yeah a good variety of sources is always essential for history

What happened to the skenderbeg video part 2?

Brief summary of this video. When it comes to Turks, even the greatest enemies can become friends. However, in the end, one side breaks its promise and betrays the other side.

I strongly disagree with the content of your video, as they contain numerous inaccuracies. Following World War II, the Russians indeed harbored intentions of permanent occupation in Iran. However, due to the astuteness of Iranian politicians like Qavam and other statesmen, coupled with assistance from the United States, the Russians were ultimately expelled. Furthermore, Iran's historical resilience against foreign conquests, evidenced by its formidable empires, prevented not only Russia but also the Ottomans from subjugating it. Had Russia possessed the capability to conquer Iran, they would have done so, akin to their actions in Central Asia. Moreover, historical documents, such as the Tsarist letters of the Russian court, attest to Russia's perennial ambition to access the warm waters of the Persian Gulf, a goal that remained unattainable. your video overlooks these critical points and contains other factual errors as well.

@flashgordon6670

24 күн бұрын

Alexander the Great. The Mongols, the Seljuks and the Kwazimians conquered Persia.

@flashgordon6670

24 күн бұрын

The Ruskies accessed the Persian gulf through trade alliance.

@flashgordon6670

24 күн бұрын

“Had Russia possessed the capability to conquer Iran, they would have done so”. - In case you didn’t notice, Russia has large borders and fronts to protect, from enemies on all sides. And there were other Empires that would support Iran, to resist Russia’s expansion. It’s not as simplistic and b/w as your brain.

@flashgordon6670

24 күн бұрын

Your own premises defeated your own daft conclusions.

@cyrusthegreat982

24 күн бұрын

@@flashgordon6670 A dumbass with 0 knowledge about history is trying to play it smart. Sure buddy. Cope harder.

Very quality content❤❤❤

5:38 HOTAKS were trying to bring a new dynasty in persia but because of modern Afghanistan independence they try to show them as foreign invaders

Because it's harder to drink vodka in places that the temperature is warmer than Russia.

Nice work

By the end of the 19th century, Britain's dominance became so pronounced that Khuzestan, Bushehr, and a host of other cities in southern Persia were occupied by Great Britain, and the central government in Tehran was left with no power to even select its own ministers without the approval of the Anglo-Russian consulates. If not colonization, then what is it ?!

@user-ox5kw7mz5r

22 күн бұрын

This is not colonialism. Colonialism was what happened in India. Who told you that Iranian ministers were appointed by England?? The Qajar government was weak, but not so much that ministers were appointed by the British.

@user-pc3ts8yc5b

21 күн бұрын

@@user-ox5kw7mz5r 1) Please, don't compare yourself with a gigantic land! India never changed its name, and India had always been culturally and technologically more advanced than your feudal kingdom. 2) Colonization has no final definition, so you can't use "one size fits all" approach. Colonization appears in various ways in different periods. Hence, Persia was de facto colony because of two reasons: a) Foreign powers' control over persian natural resources; b) Foreign powers' control over government

@pouyajabbari3912

20 күн бұрын

​@@user-pc3ts8yc5bIran never changed it's name, it was always Iran to Iranians. They changed it internationally because the Greeks never knew the name of the land. Just like Mesr was never Egypt to Egyptians and The Netherlands was never Holland to the Dutch. Also, it's interesting you mention this when India could become Bharat....

@user-pc3ts8yc5b

20 күн бұрын

​@@pouyajabbari3912 1) Egypt has always been and still is Egypt. Egyptians are the oldest nation in the world and unlike Iran, Egyptians are not in identity crisis 2) Netherlands is not an English word, it is indeed a Dutch word. I have lived there, and all Dutch native speakers called their land and landguage "Nederland". Holland is just one region in the Nederlands 3) Bharat is just a myth invented some religious nationalists, while this movement represents only tiny part of diverse multibillion nation. So, India will never change its name and accept that you can't compare your middle eastern kingdom with India. 4) Iran means land of Ayran people. Aryan race is an obsolete historical race concept that emerged in the late-19th century to describe people who descend from the Proto-Indo-Europeans as a racial grouping. However, anthropological, historical, and archaeological evidence does not support the validity of this concept. So, how come persia come Iran for its people, while "aryan myth" is relatively new phenomenon?

@pouyajabbari3912

19 күн бұрын

@@user-pc3ts8yc5b What are you talking about? Not one Egyptian in the history of Egypt has ever called it Egypt. And what do you mean by Iran has an identity crisis??? That is exactly what I'm saying, foreigners who call the Netherlands "Holland" are wrong. I don't think you are reading my post properly.... please read. You don't need to tell me what Iran means. I'm pointing out that you know nothing if you think Iran changed it's name.

0:47 I'm sure the Ottomans did not have that much land in Russia.

Biggest problem with Colonialism is that 'if I don't take it, my enemy will' which of course will make them stronger and you weaker putting your Country at risk. Its really a lose lose situation. It's hard to think any world leader can come out a good person with the hard choices that must be made.

@somedesertdude1308

22 күн бұрын

everyone is evil!!! lol

@TRLHistory

19 күн бұрын

This logic only really worked though in the pre-industrial era where the mercantilist zero sum view of geopolitics was valid. Once the industrial revolution kicked in, things changed quite a bit, though unfortunately it took some time and two world wars for the great powers to get out of the colonial mindset.

@robertortiz-wilson1588

14 күн бұрын

@@TRLHistoryin a way.

I was just reading this part in Nader Shah's history

Alternate video title: Caucusus History during the Ottoman, Persian, and Russian Empires💀

Why didn't they conquer Anatolia? why didn't they conquer Manchuria? why didn't they conquer Korea? why didn't they conquer Afghanistan?

@pelinalwhitestrake3367

23 күн бұрын

Why didn't they conquer Eurasia?

@user-pc3ts8yc5b

23 күн бұрын

Because Soviets invaded the space in 1957, which is still even after 70 years remaining unreachable for anatolians, persians, koreans, whatever🤣

They did. They conquered Azerbaijan, Turkmenistan and Tajikistan which were Persia.

Our Georgian king had done preaty bad choice while choosing russia, i know he did that to help his country but when attacks from all side one from ottoman and some from persia russia did not cared shit the fall of tbilisi was caused by several offensives done by not only persia but ottomans too and after that when our king left capital to defeat ottomans even so being massivly outnumbred he requested help from which they did and sent army but that freaking army left us in the middle of battle field and attacked Tbilisi they were not able to take bc for tyat time they were defeated by 600 man who had been late to join the king during battle and were at Tbilisi we won that battle later and fall of tbilisi as he said was caused by traitors bc that time persians were told that georgian had around 10k men and even so they were around 33k they dont wanted to fight and were leaving and that time traitirs catched up to persians and tild them that we had only 3-2k men

Romans not conquering Iran is due to the differences in religions and in trading.

I am surprised the lion of persia nader shah you forgot to cover. He recovered a great deal of the caucasus and also defeated the ottomans and indians. Comman man.

0:32 When did the Ottomans had those borders? They never did hold territories so north in modern day Russia.

@dragosstanciu9866

24 күн бұрын

The Crimean Khanate was vassal to the Ottoman Empire.

@Open89182

24 күн бұрын

The Ottomans held those territories for a time but lost it to russia later, borders change over time

@Open89182

24 күн бұрын

They held it through 1503 to 1556

@dantetre

24 күн бұрын

@@Open89182 I am talking territories above Azov and Crimea . They show a way bigger territory, which was controlled by the Golden Horde at the time.

@muksimulmaad7413

24 күн бұрын

@@dantetre They were probably tributaries to the ottomans

meanwhile Georgians trying to defend their country and themselves 🥲🇬🇪

Russians tried, know as the great game. British in India slowed Russian expansion in Central asia. By bribery, intimidation, blackmail even life ending and support rebellion or opposing forces. Closest Russian got was in ww2 when Russia occupied top third, British bottom 3rd. For supplies to Russian front against the moustache man. But both withdrew under the terms of intervention by 1947.

@maxthetube8466

24 күн бұрын

Finally somebody not coping about „strong Iran weak Russia“

@user-pc3ts8yc5b

23 күн бұрын

In 1916, Russian Cossacks were marching through Tabriz, Mashhad, Tehran and a march of Russian Imperial cavalry in the Naqsh-e Jahan square of Isfahan.

North of Aras River is called Aran and Shirvan in the historical timeline you showed. The name of Azerbaijan was stolen during the Soviet era.

@EdarMustafayev

24 күн бұрын

Lies.Persian false propoganda

@PatriotOfPersia

24 күн бұрын

​@@EdarMustafayev Persian Propaganda For What ?? It's Clear The Name Of Azerbaijan is Stolen From Iran, Iran officially sued Lenin twice for this theft in 1918 and 1920

@leylayetmez

23 күн бұрын

Azerbaijan is pahlavi persian name. Adur Payegan (Fire keeper)

@jamjar1948

21 күн бұрын

Iran and Azerbayjan republic are one nation and one history. In fact russians seperated us.

@jamjar1948

21 күн бұрын

@@EdarMustafayev Iran va Azerbayjan jumhuiati bir millat va bir tarixdir. Ruslar bizi ayirdi.

As it has become more clear by the recent declassification of US Diplomatic data (the Brits are still refusing to declassify their data about their role) and the recent books written about the number of Iranians killed by the famine induced by the Brits and Russians the estimates of the dead range between 7 to 9 million dead Iranians (not the two million mentioned in this video). Also many more died due to the Spanish flu that Russian and British troops brought with them.

They did conquer Tayikistan, which prior to 1500 was part of Persian empires

@essaadeel3676

24 күн бұрын

And now they use the Cyrillic script to write Farsi and are russianized

@user-pc3ts8yc5b

23 күн бұрын

prior to 1500, the territory of modern Tajikistan was primordial lands of Timurid Empire, which actually built the identity of modern iran in cultural sense

@jamjar1948

21 күн бұрын

@@user-pc3ts8yc5b Temurids and Gorkanids were Persianate state, and they contributed a lot in culture and civilization and poetry.

@user-pc3ts8yc5b

21 күн бұрын

@@jamjar1948 Tamerlane invaded Persia. It is illogical to call Timurids persian. Timurid culture had existed long before they annexed persia. Therefore, it would be logical to say that persians were Timurized. Look at Persia before Timurids, it was in chaos, no chance to talk about culture, but when Timurids began to enlighten, Persia came to its shape that we know it as modern iran today

@ramtin5152

19 күн бұрын

​@@user-pc3ts8yc5b They were Persianised That doesn't mean they were Persian

how did he made this map

There were a LOT of mistakes in this video so good job on that

@PastInNumbers

23 күн бұрын

*There was mistake. Everyone makes them

@1mrhp1

23 күн бұрын

@@PastInNumbers i wrote this comment at 5 am so yeah

@1mrhp1

23 күн бұрын

@@PastInNumbers also those were not small mistakes They completely messed up the timeline

@PastInNumbers

23 күн бұрын

It’s really *there are now that I’m rly thinking about it. So don’t worry I was wrong as well

@1mrhp1

23 күн бұрын

@@PastInNumbers no i edited the comment either way ty for pointing out my grammar mistake

Why does the sound make my right eardrum spasm and shudder audibly? I pause and it stops. I play and it starts again. How annoying.

@JackAtlass

24 күн бұрын

yo? go to a doctor

@biancabotanica

24 күн бұрын

​​@@JackAtlassAnd say what, 'when i watch Knowledgia's videos on KZread, my ear reacts to their audio settings'...?

@JackAtlass

24 күн бұрын

@@biancabotanica yeah go to the doctor, that shouldn’t be happening

@biancabotanica

24 күн бұрын

​@@JackAtlassit doesn't usually happen 😅- just here. I think Knowledgia needs to see an audio doctor tbh

@JackAtlass

24 күн бұрын

@@biancabotanica You, in all of the comments are the only one, get that checked out

One of the countries in Asia, namely Indonesia, has very abundant natural wealth. There are even several European countries that once colonized Indonesia, but Persia did not dare to colonize Indonesia.

Cool video, but some of the color choices are less then ideal. Why did the USSR get nearly the same color as Britain and Persia a color so close to the neighbouring sea?

Short answer 🇬🇧

@maxthetube8466

24 күн бұрын

That’s literally what I’m spamming under every comment saying Russia was „too weak“😂

Two reasons: 1) They kinda did when they annexed the caucuses and deprived the region from both Iran and Turkey. They also took modern-day Tajikistan, which is culturally Iranian. 2) Like Afghanistan, Iran was a buffer between the vast Russian central Asian region and the British Raj. And both of those powers really didn't like touching each other. So they decided to vie for influence via proxy.

After WW1, Reza Shah was the leader of Iran, only after the end of WW2 did his son, Mohammad Reza Shah game control. The Zand dynasty was also much larger, controlling parts of khorasan and all of Azerbaijan, hence the territory of the Qajars when they took power. Instead of looking at western sources, check out some maps and books from the Iranian libraries, I believe they would know more about their territories than other people

The Russians had no reason to conqerer Persia, they did however wanted persia as a puppet (because oil,etc), Annexing such a foreign land would be ridiculous.

@PatriotOfPersia

24 күн бұрын

Russia Wanted to Connect to Indian Ocean and Warm Waters Also Iran Geopolitically Is Important

@maxthetube8466

24 күн бұрын

Russia wanted to conquer Persia to also be in a position to threaten British India, their main rival at that time

@Open89182

24 күн бұрын

@@PatriotOfPersia I agree they wanted warm water ports but I'm just saying that Conqerering Persia would undoubtedly spark Revolt and resentment towards the Russians, Russia could get everything from Persia without the need to rule it. With a puppet regime the Russians newly built railways to warm ports would be much more safer and protected. They may take some land from Persia but no total conquest would ever have happen.

@lMrRedl

13 күн бұрын

теплые порты не нужны, когда есть атомные ледоколы :)

@arcsephiroth

5 күн бұрын

​@@lMrRedl dude wake up. Nuclear ice breakers are Russian answer in modern times. We are talking about historical 16-19th century where industrialization was just beginning. So back then ya russkies definitely needed warm water ports. Now they really doesn't with those m fkn nuclear ice breaker fleet

idk bro why didnt they

11:03 The USSR was reminded by the UN, but the US threatening to nuke the red army was the reason they left.

Muslims living in the Russian territory and Christians living in the Ottoman territory? What is that about? 1:42

9:15 "Turkmen chay"(chai = tea) is actually not a bad tea.

@XY-uc1tw

9 күн бұрын

chay also means small river in Turkish. there should be some river near area.

Can’t believe I’m this early I thought it was a notification I missed

**One Major Error** Persia was divided into THREE spheres of economic influence in 1907. The center remained Neutral under Iranian influence.

7:55 bro that Fat Ali Shah Kajar is suspicios bro

England should've been more helpful to Persia instead of setting her up to fail...

Feel sorry for Persia as it's been played by so many nations over the years..

Britain was defending Iran, Türkiye, and the Arabian Peninsula against Russia But they did not expect that Russia's invasion would favor them. They would then be sane enemies The current situation with Iran, Iraq, Yemen, Libya and Algeria is miserable This means that the situation of the Central Asian republics under Russian occupation is better than the situation in the Middle East, which is free and independent from Russia, but it has become more hostile to the West because of religion. I believe that the Russian occupation would have reduced Islamic tendencies in the Middle East

@SilverViper219

24 күн бұрын

I'm not sure about that. First, the situation in Iran today is the result of the incompetency and fanaticism of the current regime, unlike the arab countries whose ethnic, religious, and geopolitical issues are creating an unstable situation! Second, Muslims from the countries under Russian/Soviet rule turn out to be as fanatic as their MidEast counterparts, like Chechens, Uzbeks, and Tajiks (as seen recently!) Third, as the Soviets tried (and failed!) to take Afghanistan, a smaller country with far less population than Iran (and I'm not even talking about the rest of MidEast or Turkey!) in the 20th century with the tech advancements in weapons and vehicles and no direct interference of western countries, we can imagine what would it be like for them to try and conquer Iran (or the rest of the region for that matter). So that would be a logical hesitation on their part. All in all, I think we can agree that it would not have been easy, wise, or viable for the Russians to take over and hold such a vast territory of fundamentally different people, and even if that happened it would not benefit the situation of the MidEast today, as it has not helped the situation in any Muslim country that was part of the Russian Empire or the USSR afterward.

@user-ox5kw7mz5r

22 күн бұрын

I think the situation in Egypt is worse

@liberalegypt

22 күн бұрын

@@user-ox5kw7mz5r hhhhhhhh

@user-ox5kw7mz5r

22 күн бұрын

@@liberalegypt What are you laughing at?? Because your people sleep in the cemetery??

@liberalegypt

22 күн бұрын

@@SilverViper219 I don't know if you would be surprised if I told you that it is difficult for any European country to give appropriate treatment to the Middle East currently. Because they need compulsory treatment to leave Islam These methods follow the Middle Ages Therefore, it is difficult and almost impossible for the Islamic world to change unless an infidel ruler is the one who tries to get rid of Islam from its roots, and this depends on the coincidence factor. The European occupation could have benefited us during the time of the Crusaders if they had come in large numbers and implemented something similar to the Inquisition in the Middle East. But European colonialism in the 19th century became uninterested in religion, and this does not help the Islamic world, because no matter how much democracy or modernity you give them, they will reject it because of Islam.

That's bc of persian/iranian people resilience after arab conquest we swear that we would never be surrender to foreign rulers even if they conquer us we will never break nor they can't destroy our culture and heritage

@islammehmeov2334

24 күн бұрын

We'll you did surrender to the SELJUK TURKS MONGOLS TIMURID BRITAIN and SOVIETS

@the3zoooz1

24 күн бұрын

turks conquered you guys after lmao

@blacksheep6174

24 күн бұрын

😂😂😂😂 what the fuq

@parsarustami774

24 күн бұрын

@@the3zoooz1 and they become persinate lol

@shadowborn1456

24 күн бұрын

@@blacksheep6174 said the truth troll

Imagine the USSR having control over the Persian Gulf and the Strait of Hormuz... The world today would have been completely different.

@mushroomking19

24 күн бұрын

There would probably be a world war if they tried to conquer it

nice cover image. the russians were just waiting for the right time 🎉

Such a weird topic 😂 do a video of "why Persia didn't conquer Russia?" next

They actually tried and did capture most of the lands of conquered from Persia which was and is now Azerbaijan and several other countries. Despite the fact Majority land known as Azerbaijan remained in occupied by Persia and now Iran.

It kinda did...The persian cossack brigade was basicly the pretorian guard of iran until the Russian civil war.

It was on point until you skipped great Nader shah who is literally called Persian napoleon and after that drew fathali shah who is agha Mohamed khan brothers son, sterritory as afsharid. You literally said he was qajar but ruined this very good educational video. Also some minor problems in ottoman map. I don't no anything about Russias history at that time so there might be something wrong too. Also. Keep on good job and I may can help you for coming videos.

@user-uf6xq9lx6k

14 күн бұрын

There is a little bit of mispronounces and some not so popular narrations which are not wrong but not the main causes and stories. I can help with that to if you want.

Persia Iran: at least i am bigger then Ottoman which is Turkey now.

@KanuniSuleyman4857

21 күн бұрын

If Iran invades turkey, turks won't even stand a chance and Istanbul would be conquered with ease

@KanuniSuleyman4857

21 күн бұрын

Unless Nato comes in Turkeys help, then that would be a different case

Man you do many mistakes there like you completely deleted Nader Shah from the history of these provinces and make fath ali afshar? He war qajar

0:39 Major Powers? Is that Austin's military cousin? 😮 HuH?!!!🤓😎✌🏻🇬🇧

PAUL?! 😂

@paulfri1569

15 күн бұрын

That's me 😅

they tried during ww2. Britain sent troops.

@maxthetube8466

24 күн бұрын

They tried multiple times, there the uk supported Persia(and later occupied half of Iran) During ww2 they jointly occupied it by an agreement

@user-ox5kw7mz5r

22 күн бұрын

​@@maxthetube8466Go to Ukraine, baby

Russia only attack the weak ones with their superior numbers. They took this big area with gun power from local tribes, which use bows and swords.

1514 - there was no russia at the time, moscow principality, later kingdom & only in 1721 they rebranding themself to russia empire

8:00 He's showing the second Shah of the Qajar Dynasty while 'Afsharids" on the map. Lmao Are we supposed to learn from these people lol

The powerful empires of Rome, Byzantium, Ottoman, Russia.... could not conquer Iran, but Iran was conquered in a strange way by the emerging powers (Arabs and Afghans), it is really strange.

@Noobmaster-sh5jn

20 күн бұрын

reasons: arabs conquered Iran becasue that time Iran was busy fighting within itself which led to 32 different kings in the last 10 years before arabs invasion. Afghans also took Iran because shah sultan hosein of persia decided no to fight them untill afghans were already at the gates of capital city

@bababoi9294

5 күн бұрын

@@Noobmaster-sh5jnArabs destroyed the Sassanids when they united under the banner of Islam

Persian was always subdued by great invaders and leftovers their's outcast groups ,especially in grazed landscaper of Zagros mountain chains sides.

Because I said so.

Interesting that Armenia was under influence of Persians/Iran as they are Christian whereas Azerbaijan is Islamic. I’m assuming they are were playing off each other’s religion.

Iran was ruled, during WW2, by Reza Khan, the father of the Shah that is pictured.

@arta6183

24 күн бұрын

reza shah was replaced by his son during the war

As a matter of fact, Russia DID conquer parts of the persian empire: Azerbaijan, Turmenistan, a.s.o. For a time Russia even dominated the northern part of Iran

A couple of mistakes in this video: 1.Hotak never conquered the whole of Iran. 2. You used the wrong picture for Reza shah 3. the whole british and russia taking iran was extremely short lived and had not real effect.

Nah.. the area is one of the main regional powers of Gunpowder Empires (Ottomans, Safavid and Mughals). Invading it is costly and not worth it.

alternate title “Why didn’t the Russia invade richer, larger, more powerful Afghanistan” the war would have been an instant stalemate and cost a lot bruh idk what anyone expects

The other major linguistic shift in Iran seems to have been triggered by Turkic tribes migrating to Iran. They have played a major role in in politics by establishing Turkic empires such as Ghaznavids (977-1186 AD) and the Seljuks (1037-1134 AD). Still, in this period, Turkic variaties were not the dominant language even in the major cities and regions such as Azerbaijan (Abolghasemi 2019). Nevertheless, the establishment of these Turkic governments resulted in the migration of more Turkic tribes to Iran. The increase in migration of Turkic tribes, coupled with the rise in their political and military power, created a wave of linguistic shift in the Iranian plateau, especially in the aftermath of the Mongol invasion in the 13th and 14th ceuntries, in the 14th ceuntry, Persian and other Iranian languages were still dominant (Mustawfi [ca. 1339 AD] 2002) in Tabriz, Maragheh, and Zanjan. Due the succession of Turkic empires such as Timurids (1370-1506 AD), Safavids (1501-1722), Afsharids (1736-1796 AD), and Qajars (1789-1925), and more local monarchies such as Aq Qoyunlu (1378-1501 AD) and Qara Qoyunlu (1374-1468 AD), whose rule primarily concentrated in the northwest of historic Iran including Azerbaijan, a linguistic shift to Azeri in some cities and regions (e.g., Azerbaijan) led to gradual decline of the other languages (i.e., prominent among them Persian) in many sociolinguistic domains. (Iranian and Minority Languages at Home and in Diaspora - page 180,81)

@essaadeel3676

24 күн бұрын

Timurids were Mongolic

@Soap_bubbles591

15 күн бұрын

No major language shifting , still 80% Iranic speakers and 61% Persians ,only a minority of 18% turkic speakers.

1804 austria hungary?

10:41 this is the picture of “Mohammad Reza Shah-e Pahlavi” the son of Reza Shah-e Pahlavi. Both were two respectful Shah of Iran❤

@user-pc3ts8yc5b

23 күн бұрын

Both were sons of dehqan🤣 pretty much legitimate rulers for persia

@user-ox5kw7mz5r

22 күн бұрын

​@@user-pc3ts8yc5bIt is true that they were weak, but they are still a part of our history.

@user-pc3ts8yc5b

22 күн бұрын

@@user-ox5kw7mz5r Nobody is calling them weak or powerful. The question here is about their background! Pahlavi family was just farmers from far away Mazandaran. Pahlavi family had no royal blood . pahlavi dynasty is just illegitimate to rule in Persia due to their illegitimate take on power!

@user-ox5kw7mz5r

21 күн бұрын

​@@user-pc3ts8yc5bI am not in favor of them. They did services to Iran, but the losses of these two kings were more than their services.

@user-pc3ts8yc5b

21 күн бұрын

​@@user-ox5kw7mz5r Okay, sorry about that. However, it is not accurate to blame only these two kings in these losses. They were not aliens. They were iranians. Iranian society brought them up. They were the fruits of their own environment. These kings didn't deliberately fail Iran. They were just incapable of good governance and management. This only blame can go for the land where they grew up. Had Iran possessed a great education system, or powerful economy, or capable generation of political establishment, these kings could have performed better. Even Russia or England had stupid kings or Prime ministers, but it didn't bring the downfall of their empire

Name...

Viva IRANSHAHR

U use pictures of iranian kings wrong

this video is already wrong by the premise, unless you mean lands inhabited by ethnic persians the country of azerbaijan used to be considered as integral to Iran as South Azerbaijan before Russia conquered. Russia also conquered Tajikistan which are practically Persians that just migrated east.

Because Russia didn't play HOI4

Iran always sided with a Christian country to destroy the Ottoman empire😅This is what led to the Muslim world losing their dominance in the world.

@user-mm7zi4ue7d

16 күн бұрын

Iran is not stupid. Turkey was defeated by Europe and America. It is useless for Iran to support Turkey. It can only cause greater losses to Iran.

They tried. They went after Afghanistan first and failed.

@user-ox5kw7mz5r

22 күн бұрын

Afghanistan was an Iranian state at that time. And the Afghan rebellion was also an internal rebellion.

i think a random child gives more accurate data than this

well the ussr had Iran but ussr had 14 other countries

The soviet did it in wW2

It’s all but a Russian colony now really and clearly propagandistically has forgotten that Russia was its main colonial oppressor.

Clearly you have never hear of Nino Belov,Serbo Makeridov,Aleksandar Karanović,and slavic aryan migration in 3500BC or 2008 according to slavic aryan calendar.Otherwise you could notice russian conection with Persia,the same way as other smart people did.

Why didn’t the Russians conquer Persia? Answer: Because it’s Persia. ☠️

@user-pc3ts8yc5b

17 күн бұрын

Persia: Who are you? Russia: I am Stalin. What is your name? Persia: I ran away 🤣😂

first Iranian viewer😎🇮🇷

@Minecraftsmewtwo

24 күн бұрын

Possibly first Irish viewer

Hey,you forgot about Nader shah afshar and Karim- khan zand. Tell truth about Persian history.

yall always skip the important part. Nader Shah who reconquered the lands that the russians conquered by forcing a reaty.

Because not wasteland and hard to conquer, Persia is not like Siberia :)

@maxthetube8466

24 күн бұрын

And what were the uk and Russia doing during ww1 and ww2? Seems like your just obsessed with your delusional national pride about „not being conquered“

@user-ox5kw7mz5r

22 күн бұрын

​@@maxthetube8466Why are you commenting here?? Why don't you go to Ukraine?? Ukrainians are cooking Russian hamburger sandwiches.😂

@maxthetube8466

22 күн бұрын

You think I’m Russian just because I’m speaking facts, that’s a whole other level of stupidity

what is this rubbish title? Ignoring of a nation resilient and determination to keep it's self safe I can smell toast

@maxthetube8466

24 күн бұрын

The title isn’t saying „the world would’ve been better if if Russia conquered Persia“

simply put they couldnt coz it wasnt easy

Russian Empire seemed invincible historically. But the reality is, all countries conquered by were tribes.

@maxthetube8466

24 күн бұрын

Polish tribes( including most of Eastern Europe) swedish(finish) tribes, Chinese tribes, etc. is crazy And if it wasn’t for the uk, Persia would’ve fallen in no time, they were literally occupied for centuries and not fully colonized because of outside disagreements, same situation as siam

@yrysbekraiapov6347

24 күн бұрын

What u mean by strength? Strength is a relative term. Those countries were weak , that's why Russia was able to take over them. Btw, Russian empire was unable to take over Chukotka and Chukchi tribes through military actions. ​@@maxthetube8466

@semyongelfenbein902

19 күн бұрын

​@@maxthetube8466 don't forget the Napoleon France tribe.

@user-mm7zi4ue7d

16 күн бұрын

The American empire has historically seemed invincible. But the reality is that all conquered lands were tribal

@maxthetube8466

16 күн бұрын

@@user-mm7zi4ue7d is that supposed to be ironic

Fath All Shah seems to have aimed at ruling in accordance with those concepts of Iranian Shahanshahl which the age of the Safavids had come to symbolize. He did not possess the sacral charisma enjoyed by the descendants of Shah IsmaiI I, but he stressed his family's links with the heroic past of the Oghuz, with the migrations of the Turkmens in the days of the Il-Khans and the Aq Quyunlu, and with the age of Qizilbash hegemony. Court chroniclers lent their eloquence to the historicity of this tribal heritage. Court chroniclers lent their eloquence to the historicity of this tribal heritage. Hambly, G. (1991). IRAN DURING THE REIGNS OF FATH ‘Alī SHāH AND MUHAMMAD SHāH. In P. Avery, G. Hambly, & C. Melville (Eds.), The Cambridge History of Iran (The Cambridge History of Iran, pp. 144-173). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. The Qājār dynasty, descended from a tribe whose early traces in Iran date to the eleventh century, held the reins of power until 1925. Much like the Safavids, they were Turkmen and spoke Turkish: their ethnic group of about 10,000 people led a nomadic life in northern Iran when it conquered the principalities that had fought over the Iranian plateau after the death of Nāder Shāh (1747). Richard, Y. (2019). Iran under the Qajars. In Iran: A Social and Political History since the Qajars (pp. 1-17). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. İ

@amir7890

24 күн бұрын

you guys are funny... claiming Iranians, Arabs, Greeks, Geogians, Armainas and even Russians to be turk. a -_- guy is claiming a o_o guy to be turk. :))) about safavids: An Iranian dynasty rooted in the Sufi Safavid order[34] founded by Kurdish sheikhs,[35] it heavily intermarried with Turkoman, [36] Georgian,[37] Circassian, [38][39] and Pontic Greek[40] 👉🏻👉🏻👉🏻 sources: Matthee, Rudi. (2005). The Pursuit of Pleasure: Drugs and Stimulants in Iranian History, 1500-1900. Princeton University Press. p. 18; "The Safavids, as Iranians of Kurdish ancestry and of nontribal background (...)". Savory, Roger. (2008). "EBN BAZZAZ". Encyclopaedia Iranica, Vol. VIII, Fasc. 1. p. 8. "This official version contains textual changes designed to obscure the Kurdish origins of the Safavid family and to vindicate their claim to descent from the Imams." Amoretti, Biancamaria Scarcia; Matthee, Rudi. (2009). "Safavid Dynasty". In Esposito, John L. (ed.) The Oxford Encyclopedia of the Islamic World. Oxford University Press. "Of Kurdish ancestry, the Safavids started as a Sunni mystical order (...)" Roemer, H.R. (1986). "The Safavid Period" in Jackson, Peter; Lockhart, Laurence. The Cambridge History of Iran, Vol. 6: The Timurid and Safavid Periods. Cambridge University Press. pp. 214, 229 Blow, David (2009). Shah Abbas: The Ruthless King Who Became an Iranian Legend. I.B.Tauris. p. 3 Savory, Roger M.; Karamustafa, Ahmet T. (1998) ESMA`IL I SAFAWI. Encyclopaedia Iranica Vol. VIII, Fasc. 6, pp. 628-636 Ghereghlou, Kioumars (2016). HAYDAR SAFAVI. Encyclopaedia Iranica

@AltaicGigachad

24 күн бұрын

@@amir7890 scholars like Matthee for example switched and accepted Safavids as Turkic origin most of your sources are outdated and unreliable because ibn bazzaz is not a evidence while all medieval sources wrote that they were Turkic even ibn bazzaz said that they came from Khorasan this would already debunk his claim 🤣 Undoubtedly, one of the biggest known mistakes is that Firuz Shah is regarded as a Kurd. This is never possible. Firuz Shah Zerrinkülah is not a Kurd, his name is Kızıl Bork Firuz. Kızıl Bork came to Mugan and Arran with a ruler descended from Ibrahim Ethem, and after he conquered this place, he resided in Ardebil. The author in Safvetü's Safa that Firuz Shah came from Sencan, and Ahmed Kesrevî, by not making sufficient academic studies, said that there was no such region as Sencan, that since "Firuz Shah el-Kürdî" is mentioned in Safvetü's Safa, Sinjar is the closest to the word Sencan, He said that Ibn Bazzaz wrote it wrong. Sinjar's being in Iraq and the passing of al-Kurdi nisba made Firuz Shah a Kurd. However, it is wrong, in al-Baghdadi's work he wrote that a region called Sencan was near Merv . In the corpus of Hata'i, it is written that the Sencan region is located in Nishapur and its surroundings . In addition, the word "Kurd" in the nisba of Firuz Shah "al-Kürdi" is used differently even then and now even thought it was moreover used for Nomads. Even Mazenis still use the word Kurd, which means "Nomad and Shepherd", as shepherd. It was called "Ekrâdi (Kurdish) Turkmani” in order to introduce the nomadic Turkmens in the Ottomans . Also, we wrote in the title that Firuz Shah came with a commander from the lineage of İbrahim Ethem. Let's not forget that İbrahim Ethem was from Khorasan... Firuz Shah definitely came from the Khorasan or Turkistan region, he is clearly Turkish. In the important Safavid source the Âlemârâ, it is written that Firuz was a Turk. (Source: İskender bey Münşi, "Tarix-aləm Aray-i Abbasi", sah.109. Alemara (Sahib), p.1; Alemara (Şükri),p.3. İskender bey Münşi, "Tarix-i aləm Aray-i Abbasi", sah.28.)

@AltaicGigachad

24 күн бұрын

@@amir7890 This list of qualities reads like a catalogue of all that he found wanting in the Persians he met.29 His view was that Persia had no real nobility; by that he ruled out the Turkman military élite which had monopolized all the pro- vincial governments and most of the important offices since Safavid rule began at the beginning of the sixteenth century. He was contemptuous of their aristocratic pretensions; their coarse, ignorant behaviour confirmed their origins as mere soldiers of fortune and Turkish at that. Persians-real Persians who lived under that intolerable subjection, and could trace their descent back beyond the Turkman supremacy-he saw in a different light.30 This was not simply a reflection of della Valle's snobbish concern with pedigree; there was still a marked distinction between these different elements in Safavid society. Pietro della Valle: The Limits of Perception J. D. Gurney Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London Vol. 49, No. 1, In Honour of Ann K. S. Lambton (1986), pp. 103-116 (14 pages) Published By: Cambridge University Press

@AltaicGigachad

24 күн бұрын

@@amir7890 Within the decade following his capture of Tabriz in 1501, Isma'il occupied the geographic center of the pre-Islamic Achaemenid and Sasanian Iranian empires. He did so, though, with Oghuz tribes whose knowledge of the Shah-nama and the glories of pre-Islamic Iranian kingship was almost certainly limited to inchoate oral traditions one of his poems the prasenik-i Ajail, he "state" or "kingdom of Iran," is that even though Tabriz, Azerbaijan, and Mesopotamia represented provinces of the pre-Islamic Shahanshahs, the "kings of Kings" of Iran, there is no evidence that Isma'il imagined himself to be reconstituting a new Iranian empire; rather he planned to establish a messianic Shi'i state on Aq Quyunlu foundations. Within the decade following his capture of Tabriz in 1501, Isma'il occupied the geographic center of the pre-Islamic Achaemenid and Sasanian Iranian empires. He did so, though, with Oghuz tribes whose knowledge of the Shah-nama and the glories of pre-Islamic Iranian kingship was almost certainly limited to inchoate oral traditions. Isma'il was reconstituting the Aq Quyunlu state in these conquests, and like that of the Aq Quyunlu, the ultimate focus of his ambitions was eastern Anatolia, where his father and grandfather and he himself had proselytized among the Turks. Dale, S. (2009). The rise of Muslim empires. In The Muslim Empires of the Ottomans, Safavids, and Mughals (New Approaches to Asian History, pp. 48-76). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

@jackholler3572

24 күн бұрын

​@@amir7890 It is the truth... You guys try to erase Turkish rule till today and call everyone iranian or persian...now that is funny.

You’re wrong, according to yourself the british empire stopped Russians to access the warm waters of Persian gulf, ot was peter the greats will …

All of your titles make me midly infuriated