What did you think of this animation style? Any suggestions? :)

@petrabanjarnahor229

2 ай бұрын

It's already sufficient, carried by your explanation. The explanation feels a tad too literal, you could definitely use the usual church language more.

@josephanyim9458

2 ай бұрын

This is the best video you've made so far. May God keep inspiring you. Amen.🙏🏽

@kazuhitoshi9701

2 ай бұрын

Its simplicity really lets the message get across. Great job brother!

@Gas_Station_Tampons

2 ай бұрын

keep doing what your doing, fren

@samk659

2 ай бұрын

I think you have been cooking bro, Thank God for this beautiful animation

Jesus answered, “I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me.

@user-vx8ln8bj1h

2 ай бұрын

And now we christians are the only way to the Father John 17:11-25

@WesleyGathage

2 ай бұрын

​@@user-vx8ln8bj1h no. Only Christ.

@desmonides

2 ай бұрын

@@user-vx8ln8bj1hthe gates to heaven have the 12 tribes written above them Thru Christ, the gentiles are grafted into Israel- not replacing

@arspsychologia4401

2 ай бұрын

@@desmonides The 12 tribes are cut off for rejecting God, as the branches that do not bear fruit must be pruned. Romans 11:19-20 explicitly says "Then you will say, “Branches were broken off so that I might be grafted in.” That is true. They were broken off because of their unbelief, but you stand fast through faith. So do not become proud, but fear". If they once more show signs of health they may be grafted back, but otherwise they are still on the compost heap.

@BlazeFlintin

2 ай бұрын

John 14:6 He is the ONLY way to God the Father, Amen!

“Religion is mans attempt to reach God and Christianity is Gods attempt to reach man” that made me tear up for some reason.

@user-lf8sn3xz3n

2 ай бұрын

Along with that, I can say that man will always fail, so religion cannot do what it claims to do. But God always gets it right, he never fails, so Christianity will always do what it says it will do.

@absolstoryoffiction6615

2 ай бұрын

@@user-lf8sn3xz3n Yes and no... But mortals are mortals. Just saying... If you think Lucifer is the origin of Evil, then you know not of it's true existence. Pride was corrupted for a reason, by another beyond the strongest of angels.

@user-lf8sn3xz3n

2 ай бұрын

@@absolstoryoffiction6615 Uh... I don't understand what this has to do with what I said...

@absolstoryoffiction6615

2 ай бұрын

@@user-lf8sn3xz3n God is not the only one, that's all. If you don't understand, then find the copy of the Akashic Records in Heaven when you're there. If the Angels let you.

@user-lf8sn3xz3n

2 ай бұрын

@@absolstoryoffiction6615 You just made me more confused... What the hell is Akashic Records?

I am in literal shock I was sittiing on my chair thinking if Jesus Christ is true and then suddenly this video popped up, I watched it and it made me finally realize.I thank you lord for showing me the truth.

@gbx2049

2 ай бұрын

Praise the Lord! God bless you in Jesus name

@NoNo-jb7kj

2 ай бұрын

WOOOOOOOOOOO WELCOME TO THE FAMILY 🥳

@ora_et_labora1095

2 ай бұрын

God bless you!

@Jesus_is_the_1way

2 ай бұрын

All of Heaven rejoices when one sinner repents and puts his faith in Jesus, I’m glad you received the truth ❤

@Wind0watcher

2 ай бұрын

God waited patiently for you, and it paid off

"The Blind could see, the deaf could hear, and the dead are raised to life" This has a double meaning, those who were spiritually dead can now see, hear, and now are spiritually alive.

@user-df2fl1pj6q

2 ай бұрын

Awesome analogy🖖❤👍

@Rabbinicphilosophyforthewin

2 ай бұрын

Spiritual death is a made up concept though. The proper reading of statements like “you were dead in your sins and now you’re alive in Christ (para)” is that the ultimate end (ie, meaning) of a person’s life is the grave; in Christ, our ultimate end is eternal life. This comports much better with the Hebrew worldview, which revolves around meaning (also the lack of the concept of time in the language), as opposed to the Greek worldview, which revolved around something like objectivity (and involved all sorts of time-based language). And it doesn’t require us to make up concepts to add to the Bible. Whoever thought up the idea of spiritual death thought more like a Greek. It’s not that the idea of spiritual death is harmful; it’s just not biblically necessary .

@yungyucci3877

2 ай бұрын

John 3:3-7 (NKJV): 3 Jesus answered and said to him, “Most assuredly, I say to you, unless one is born again, he cannot see the kingdom of God.” 4 Nicodemus said to Him, “How can a man be born when he is old? Can he enter a second time into his mother’s womb and be born?” 5 Jesus answered, “Most assuredly, I say to you, unless one is born of water and the Spirit, he cannot enter the kingdom of God. *6 That which is born of the flesh is flesh, and that which is born of the Spirit is spirit.* 7 Do not marvel that I said to you, ‘You must be born again.’ I see that you're Jewish, I'll honour the Lord by sharing what he had said to the person who was the teacher of all of Israel at the time, Nicodemus. I encourage you examine the relationship between Jesus and Nicodemus.

@yungyucci3877

2 ай бұрын

@@Rabbinicphilosophyforthewin If you neglect the spirit of the law you will be in danger. It's much deeper than what I know but yet I strive to keep on learning from the Spirit who is within us, always ready to give us the knowledge we don't deserve. You are in danger of spiritual blindness, you need to be able to see spiritually in order to be a doer of the word to it's fullest extent. It may not be biblically necessary, but it's necessary spiritually. The spirit enriches our understanding of what we read, spirit and the letter of the law go hand in hand.

@TheGreyShaman

2 ай бұрын

A lot of things spoken of happen in the spiritual realm I take that over zombies and the dead being brought back through AI and holograms

In case you've forgotten, God loves you. Jesus loves you. On your journey beware of traps and snares. Do unto others as you would have them do unto you.

@eluclid

2 ай бұрын

Eh

@cobramcjingleballs

2 ай бұрын

@@eluclid love God, Love your neighbor.

@nebeskocarstvo2953

2 ай бұрын

Amen.

@christopherpearson2116

2 ай бұрын

Well, we know He likes snares. And traps? As 2 Samuel 24... did give that, impression... So yes, be wary.

@dougboy2856

Ай бұрын

​@@christopherpearson2116Simple question who Wrote the bible because the torch and quran state their authors and Matthew mark luke Jhon aren't there real names even in the old Greek MANUSCRIPTS they can't find an author just notes from Priest and saints they Claim to pick from Seventy gospels to make up the thirty seven gospels of the original new testament so who came up with the gospels and what happened to the ones that didn't make it and who came up with These gospels please do your research with a grain of salt

Old Testament/ Hebrew Bible/ Jewish Faith - Faith in Lord God looking forward to the cross New Testament - Faith in Jesus Christ looking back at the cross Is it still possible to find faith in Christ by having the same faith as the Old Testament?

@schalkheymans9098

2 ай бұрын

No its not the same

@hrayrbarseghyan5453

2 ай бұрын

Old Testament is actually a backbone for Christianity also. Uncountable amount of concepts we use came from Old Testament. Crucial ones like sacrifice system, God being the creator of everything, all knowing, all powerful, loving and compassionate, and many more things about God. Also important concepts like a prophet being God's messenger, therefore books of the prophets being a word from God, and much much more. Judaism was essential in making a way for Jesus to come and redeem and save us. But our faith in Christ is not same as their belief in God, because nowadays rejecting God's Son and applying for old placeholder system to save you is not God's Will.

@Minutemansurvivalist

2 ай бұрын

​@@schalkheymans9098Explain punk

@daejonmoody3304

2 ай бұрын

In the Old Testament they looked forward to Christ but in the New Testament and today we look back on what Christ has done. It’s all on Jesus

@artax7664

2 ай бұрын

Without the Old Testament, how would we be able to believe the New Testament? Jesus is said to be “the fulfillment of the Old Testament law”. What does that mean? Well, it means that if you were to take everything that God has taught us, everything He commanded in the Old Testament, and live it perfectly as God intended, you get Jesus’ life. Jesus is the perfect revelation of God, and the example to how we should live our life. In that perfect life, He willingly took the punishment that we deserved so that we can be set free from judgment, and gives us the Holy Spirit, so we can break the chains that sin has on us here in this life.

He lived a life we could not and died a death we deserve. He simply asks us that we repent, believe and follow Him.

@user-ej6el2zp6f

2 ай бұрын

What? 😂 You think you deserved to be tortured and crucified? Wtf have you done in your life thats so bad you think you are deserving of that?

@ladtm

2 ай бұрын

Who? Mithra?

@c4brownie

2 ай бұрын

What proof do we have that it even was Jesus who said all these things? And if the response would be "Because it says so in the bible." then how do we know that the bible is actually from God? 35 - 40 authors over thousands of years all conveying the "same" message? It does not make sense

@joe9378

2 ай бұрын

@@c4brownie that is a wonderful question. something that some may find somewhat interesting. if a united states judge in courtroom allows for one or two witnesses for their testimonies "for or against" something or someone in a court of law and allows their journal to used as a legal testimony, then why are 35-40 authors as witnesses different for what we consider acceptable in a courtroom today?

@c4brownie

2 ай бұрын

@@joe9378 because we know who those testimonies are, we know they exist. Who were the 40 authors?

I'm a Christian, but this video portrayed Buddhists unfairly. Many of them do not seek the mountaintop. The Buddha saw the flaw of these pursuits as well. One way to think about it is that Buddhists train in how to stop seeking.

@seneynah

2 ай бұрын

I believe Buddha and Christ were buds they are very similar in a philosophical sense. Marcus Orelius and the stoics is also incorporated into the Christian faith.

@arthurarmour5480

2 ай бұрын

@@seneynahyes Christ is mentioned in Buddhist records

@jossdeiboss

2 ай бұрын

I think this video is more centered on the actual timeline and area where the Old Testament and New Testament take place. Jesus came down on Earth in the Kingdom of Israel. This is where the Prophets and other great men in the Old Testament tried to seek God by "climbing the mountain". There is where Christianity started spreading to the world. So, I think the beginning actually focuses only on the Biblical tradition of the Old Testament.

@sophiawalker7463

2 ай бұрын

Well, the Buddhist approach is also incorrect. Christians do not seek to climb the mountain, but they do seek to know the God that came down to them and to make Him known. They still seek, but their energy goes in a different direction. The video doesn’t mention any religions by name, so maybe Buddhism wasn’t even in the video, or maybe they were some of the ones who remained at the bottom.

@Jepperyful

2 ай бұрын

@@seneynahnothing alike in terms of the path to salvation.

"religion is man's attempt to reach god, Christianity is God's attempt to reach man" is such a powerful statement

@AshleyASolis

2 ай бұрын

For reel ❤❤❤ that's our Loving and righteous God who payed the penalty of the world sins to save us a have a true and sincere relationship with him just like in John 3:16-17❤❤❤ in Jesus Christ mighty name AMEN 🙏 ❤️ 💖👑👑💖👑💖🦁🦁✨️🐑🐑🕊✨️🕊✨️🦁🕊👑

@yourpt7161

2 ай бұрын

one without a one logical fallacy, indeed!

@cametogetfit

Ай бұрын

MANNN!!!🙆🏽‍♂️✝️

@UltraVioletKnight

Ай бұрын

Wrong, the Bible was written by men, it's no different than other religions.

@cametogetfit

Ай бұрын

@@UltraVioletKnight Other religions like Islam believe the Bible was written by God. Our Holy Bible was written by humans but God inspired their writings through the Holy Spirit. Believe that or don’t, it’s not our problem. Live your life how you want to and we’ll live ours the way we want. But all I ask is that if you truly want to seek the truth, just go read the Bible for yourself… WITH A NEW LENS. Don’t say “it’s guilty until proven innocent.” Remove that mindset and just read it, and if you don’t find it to be reliable, credible, or even useful… don’t believe it.

May God bless everyone who reads this comment! 🙏🏻☦️❤️

@gamespc-zi6zo

2 ай бұрын

God bless you too but i have a question, i drifted from God around 3 days before easter this year, i dont know how to get back to him do u have any tips?

@anothersoldier8447

2 ай бұрын

@@gamespc-zi6zoMy simple advise is to repent of your sins brother. Are you sorry for your sins? Do you have the desire to come back to Him? If both answers are yes, then ask Him to forgive you (first, forgive anyone you may have unforgiveness towards in your heart for any wrong deed they've done to you). If you're not baptized yet, I HIGHLY HIGHLY advise you to do so (Acts 2:38). If you feel empty (well, really whether or not you feel this way), ask Jesus to baptize you in the Holy Spirit and to fill you up. This is where real transformation should take place and you get closer to God. God bless brother🙏. Remember, He is faithful and just to forgive you if you confess your sins to Him.

@mr.crusade

2 ай бұрын

Thank you, you too😊

@YeshuaIsTheSonOfGod

2 ай бұрын

God bless!

@skubamontana867

2 ай бұрын

@@gamespc-zi6zosee Isaiah 1:18 and Philippians 4:6.the Lord loves you. You are never too far away when it comes to Him. Never too dark. Never impossible.

God bless you for this, it was Truly a blessing. I'll also want to add; Religion Says, "I have sinned, My father is going to punish me". Gospel says, "I have sinned, I need to call my father".

@russell_keir1840

2 ай бұрын

May I add Islam says, “ I have sinned, God will punish me unless I repent, and turn to God and for his Forgiveness for God is Most Merciful, Most Compassionate”

@seneynah

2 ай бұрын

@@russell_keir1840that’s where Islam is wrong. God doesn’t punish, He walks away and lets you reap the natural consequences of your behavior. He removes His grace until you repent and turn back to Him it just gets worse and worse… God made the world and its laws like gravity He also created human nature and relational laws spelled out in His word go against at your peril like jumping off a cliff…

@senithaplayzroblox2223

2 ай бұрын

Umm actually your approach is wrong this world is endless you repeat the same for over and over nobody knows how old you are even if you're a god or your suffering in hell you will be repeating those depending on your behavior only way to get rid of those is nirvana and Buddhism has so many evidences and I mean Christianity is good but some are made up idk I dont think any religion is wrong people made some things by themself and corrupt religions

“If you don’t believe this, you’ll be disregarded the rest of history!” But if you believe Christianity, you’re disregarding all other religions.

@ignantxxxninja

2 ай бұрын

What other religion lines up with world history?

@divideby4billion

Ай бұрын

Disregard other religions, perhaps. But disregarding their followers? No. All are welcome and reborn through Christ.

I was allowed the privilege to take this video from 666 likes to 667 😅

@robertdewindt862

2 ай бұрын

Doing the Lord’s work son

@328am

2 ай бұрын

@@robertdewindt862 😂

@hiramgames

2 ай бұрын

DCLXVI

@rosenbaumquartz

2 ай бұрын

You're not special

@AlekzanderTamayo-ln8bf

2 ай бұрын

​@@rosenbaumquartzAt least be nice

This video does not attempt to explain "Why Christianity is the only true religion." It's merely a paraphrasing of the Bible using an analogy.

@revetup

Ай бұрын

Did you miss the part where he prefaces with all the other groups of people attempting to reach God and failing?

@Cod3Thr33

Ай бұрын

@@revetup, I didn’t miss that part, however, a non-Christian could very easily say it’s merely the narrator’s OPINION that other religions fail to reach God. My point is that the title is misleading. It reads like it’s going to be a comparative religion lesson, but it isn’t.

@Joseph_RobinetteBidenJr

18 күн бұрын

Exactly, in a more clear way for people that didn't understand the Bible and needed a animation to understand

@Cod3Thr33

14 күн бұрын

@@Joseph_RobinetteBidenJr, in that case, they should have titled it "For people that don't understand the Bible and need a animation" instead of "Why Christianity is the ONLY True Religion".

@Joseph_RobinetteBidenJr

14 күн бұрын

@@Cod3Thr33 still works tbh

This video offers nothing to people who aren't already Christians.

@ForOneToOne-km9fd

2 ай бұрын

Fair. In good delerius echo chamber nature though, he thinks his religion is different than other religions. That he is special. “Unlike” other religions.

@Matteo-1

Ай бұрын

@@ForOneToOne-km9fd You literally believe that your beliefs are correct and therefore everyone who disagrees is incorrect. You either have to believe you are correct or be searching for the truth, otherwise you are just wrong. You can't believe that 2 contradicting beliefs are correct.

@sakigiagkos

Ай бұрын

It offers Christ

@Spriktor

Ай бұрын

​@@ForOneToOne-km9fdChristianity teaches we cant save ourselves. You cant bribe a judge with good deeds

@coinsterr

Ай бұрын

There's an irony to be appreciated about the reference to Taoism 1:47 as the video appropriates the "oral tradition from the orient" aesthetic

great analogy good work man

Still doesnt explain Why Christianity is the ONLY True Religion

@AntarcticMagpie

2 ай бұрын

We can never reach God through our own efforts, so God came to dwell with us. At the end of time, He will do so forever: check out Revelation chapters 21 and 22.

@ginodivirgilio

2 ай бұрын

clickbait title

@isawwhatthedoghasdone2549

2 ай бұрын

​@@AntarcticMagpiehive mind aah religion

@henriquemuller42

2 ай бұрын

@@isawwhatthedoghasdone2549ngl, I don’t have beef with religions but Christians and their goofy ah converting system really annoys me, look at that dude, he is literally saying, “wait a gazillion billion years and god is gonna appear for us”

@spagghettiwarrior66

2 ай бұрын

Christians (protestants mostly) have this fallacy that their religion is the only one with the concept of "God's grace" and everyone else tries to achieve salvation by their own "works". This concept of grace and "means of grace" is present in Hinduism and Buddhism and was there for thousands of years before Christianity. They both have means of forgiveness of sins. Main Land Buddhism even has the same exact notion of "substitutionary atonement" Christians are so proud of. The analogy of this video is false.

What an incredible way to explain it!

Man I love me some spicy religious content in the evening Edit: this started out as a cynical, tongue-in-cheek joke, but man; this was a ride. Great style, great anology and great message

Love your content. Keep up the great work for the kingdom. God bless you sir.

This is so sooo good man. Got tears in my eyes, feeling as if a burden got removed from me which I never knew was on. God bless!

If Jesus Christ’s miracles are really true and the whole world should unite under his word that means that the Sikh community that I have been raised in to would be abolished and the traditions that my ancestors have passed down would be abandoned. I believe people should practice whatever faith they want to but I strongly dislike the Christian and Islamic urge to convert people by telling them their religion is wrong and they will go to hell for not being apart of theirs. A truly unified world is where we let each other practice what we want in peace.

@santoshkumar-cr6gi

2 ай бұрын

A truly united world is a world where every single human being has one common important (or non important anyways it will never be that) goal and they honestly give their efforts towards it.

@galvangahunia2195

2 ай бұрын

@@santoshkumar-cr6gi I mean a world where everyone shares the same goal or vision is pretty much impossible and if you look at history it’s not worth fighting for. So I think we should let others believe what they want to in peace as long as it doesn’t mean harm.

@santoshkumar-cr6gi

2 ай бұрын

@@galvangahunia2195 I am talking about a common goal as a species which means something we all or most can agree on. My point is that we are not significantly going on something. Also yep I do agree that we all are different and can't be the same thus we have to make communities but there should be something we all have to agree on to make a plan for it work accordingly to it. That's the most basic step to form rules and I think that if we have one common way of living WHICH do not criticize any of our living standards. Like something which we all can agree on is survival right? All of us want to live life moderately peacefully. Because you can't eliminate chaos and it's bad to eliminate chaos. So something like that is what I am talking about.

@henriquemuller42

2 ай бұрын

@@santoshkumar-cr6gitrying to make everyone have a single goal also works for communism, it’s a perfect way of life, but a utopian world will never be possible, everyone would try getting over someone for more

@santoshkumar-cr6gi

2 ай бұрын

@@henriquemuller42 That's why those who don't agree can make different groups. I coined that to make it more clear on what some specific people have to go on.

This doesn’t actually contain an argument for Christianity’s truth

@pandacrush419

2 ай бұрын

All religions are about doing. In Christianity is about done. It is not our good works that will get us to see the Creator. It is the internal relationship and external relationship that you have with him. Truth be told we're All weak pieces of trash but we can go to heaven. Cuz we still have a ticket. Either you can pay for it and you know the cost or someone else can pay for it cuz they already paid for it.

@anthonyshannon7559

2 ай бұрын

@@pandacrush419 So it makes an argument that Christianity is unique among religions, but does not demonstrate that it is uniquely true. It also misses the fact that Christ means 'anointed' and that he, The Great High Priest washed and anointed them. He was baptised by John and anointed with oil. Religious washings and anointing and the necessity of obedience to commandment are found through the Old and New Testament. While we are to understand that it is Jesus Christ's suffering for our sins that allows us to become sanctified, those rituals and the priesthood they were performed under, including baptism, point us to that sacrifice and are required by him. You cannot reject Gods laws and ordinances and then say you accept Christ. 'And everyone who hears these words of mine and does not do them will be like a foolish man who built his house on the sand. And the rain fell, and the floods came, and the winds blew and beat against that house, and it fell, and great was the fall of it.” And when Jesus finished these sayings, the crowds were astonished at his teaching, for he was teaching them as one who had authority, and not as their scribes.

@pandacrush419

2 ай бұрын

@@anthonyshannon7559 you make some great points my friend. But Christianity isn't a religion, their spirituality. Because Christ is God he didn't make religion men did. He made spiritual relationship. Christians calling his to be the salt and light of the world. So that it may have flavor and the light so people can see. I believe that it is between the person in Jesus to ask for forgiveness of sins. And yes, even the Old testament with are the laws of Moses. But in Galatians says those who follow the Moses are cursed. Christ came to establish the law, not enforce it. That is why when we sin it's like a stab in his heart. The fear of the Lord is being afraid of hurting him. Because we love him so much for sacrificing himself so that we don't have to suffer. For not measuring up to God's standards.

@briannicapowell9135

2 ай бұрын

​@@anthonyshannon7559 actually the new testiment is not about following the commandments. Many religious denominations might teach this, but that is a tradition taught by men. When Jesus came to the earthe, he came to deliver the old testiment jews into accepting him as the Messiah. His talk about the commandments is to a people who only know and follow the law. After Christ was crucified, the gospel of salvation was given. By the jews rejecting their Messiah, and killing him, he became the passover lamb, a semblance to jews in captivity in Egypt. By accepting his death, burial, and ressurection, any one can become saved. By understanding God's love for you, and your new lifestyle, you will follow commandments, but out of love, not necessity. The apostle Paul wrote numerous times that we're incapable of doing the whole law, we will fail, it is under grace through faith in his sacrifice that gives us an actual relationship to God.

@davidsabo405

2 ай бұрын

Yip yap

I've been an atheist for as long as I've had an opinion on the matter. A while a go I started studying christianity out of pure curiosity and fascination, I started reading the bible and watching debates between believers and non believers and so on. Suddenly somewhere along the way something changed in me, it's hard to describe but suddenly and almost instanty I felt this sense of belonging and peace. It felt like when you are short on time and someone suddenly appears and points you in the right direction and everything sorts itself out. The description of the holy spirit in this video is the best explanation for that experience I've heard and I almost teared up there for a moment. God bless you

I found this logic funny, considering that in the Bible, Moses literally climbs a mountain to go see God. There are numerous times when Christians go, 'hey god, if I just do this one thing, please bless me.' It also doesn't help that for most Christians, working to heaven was standard belief until the Reformation when Luther came along and proclaimed grace and faith were the most important of worship. This video also dismisses the faith that many other religions have gods come down to earth to work miracles. In Hinduism, Vinshu uses different avatars and forms that come down to earth to save the world. You could try a little harder with your stories.

@simulationbros

2 ай бұрын

This is different because for the case of Moses it’s because God wanted him alone, not with the people, completely different context. Also they don’t believe that works puts them in a higher position but prevents themselves from being empty with a fake faith. It reinforces their faith which itself keeps someone closer to God. God chose many people you would not expect to be prophets, he didn’t choose them purely based on who did the most works in his name.

@davidbrevik2537

2 ай бұрын

@@simulationbros Aw, yes, because Moses was faithful to God, but because he cursed one time about something, God denied him entry into the holy land. Moses wasn't prefect but that guy did lead the people for years and was denied for one silly, sin. God is fickled and unforgiving person. Also, does anyone who worship a god believe they are higher than said god? And latest, no duh nobody know who would be prophet. Humans only really accept a prophet word after the fact. And then people like you accept it because, ha, surely hindsight is one hundred percent.

@arthurarmour5480

2 ай бұрын

⁠@@davidbrevik2537Gods actions changed as the environment of his people changed which only makes sense. God never denied Moses salvation. Denying him Israel’s promised land is different from denying salvation. God is a forgiving God. Doesn’t mean that there should never be punishments at least in that time. Moses was separated from the people because at that time the people had a broken relationship with God. You have to understand that in the time of Moses it was completely different from now. Christ came as that man Moses was and created a bridge for us so we no longer needed a priest to have direct connection with God. Instead he choose to live inside of us so we could then have a personal connection with him. Jesus was the ultimate sacrifice. Not like a young lamb who needed to be sacrificed but he was truly perfect and of God paying for all of our sins. And that is all I have to say.

@davidbrevik2537

2 ай бұрын

@@arthurarmour5480 You do realize that what Moses did was deny his life work, all because of cursing out loud. That punishment is stupid. I more incline to believe that Moses just die before reaching Israel and the Israelist made up an excuse for the embrassment. As for Jesus, I don't believe he is God nor do I want your God to exist. The God of the old Testiment is cranky old tyrant who only made humans to stroke his ego. You can keep hom.

@arthurarmour5480

2 ай бұрын

@@davidbrevik2537 Btw read the Old Testament thoroughly before commenting on it. Moses was not denied the promised land because he cursed out loud. He was denied the promised land when he doubted God’s power and chose to do things his own way when breaking open the rock with water using his staff. In that day and age God needed to be more forceful and had to establish a law system to keep the people in check because there were many more pagan religions at the time who indulged in vile acts. He had to stop his people from joining in on this terrible behavior and therefore and to be more strict. I cannot fully speak for God as he knows more than me and all of us but basic reason has led me to this conclusion which is shared with many people. You can believe what you want to in the end even if many find it to be ignorant.

How exactly does this prove that Christianity is the only true religion?

@octaviocampos5294

2 ай бұрын

Idk

@rickcasual

Ай бұрын

It proves Christianity is nothing like other religions and is true. Even this is nothing like what the roman pagan church requires for salvation, if thats what comes to your mind. Actual Christianity is a true faith, without relics, pictures, or popes. It is a faith that when you see it truly change your heart, you come closer to Christ and know it is true. You have no idea how cringe you and all unbelievers are. Farting around aimlessly completely miserable, no hope, thinking it'll all go black when its over. Its sad, but no one has any excuses. You can find the scriptures anywhere, they can be mailed to your doorstep, you can find someone online who teaches them freely on youtube. But people like you would rather "trust the science", believe what the world tells you, and not what God has been telling us since before we existed. You have infinitely more trust in satans institutions than trust in the most popular person to have every existed, that everyone on earth knows the name of, who is still to this day after 2000 years, attacked non-stop. Jesus Christ. Once you accept the truth, youll start to see how you have always been deceived by the world, how deep the deception goes, and how it is a miracle you were brought out of it and into the light.

@Vimideye

Ай бұрын

Well what the heck do you want? Isn’t it obvious by now that you will never receive 100%% proof it takes faith then you may get proof like I did I know Jesus personally and he’s opened my eyes

@zsan157

Ай бұрын

@@Vimideye Oh I already know I will never have proof of Christianity, because there is none, like you said it relies heavily on faith but that’s besides the point. This video is claiming to prove that Christianity is the one true religion, but it’s not even offering an argument let alone evidence, like there are plenty of arguments Christian’s like to use to back their beliefs, but this video doesn’t even offer an argument it’s literally just an analogy explaining Christian beliefs, the title is incredibly misleading.

Yoooo this was amazing y the music, the cinematic animation style, story telling form and moral, excelente this was soooo coool

This does not explain why Christianity is the only true religion, this is just a religious version of storytime animated.

@LocustsAndWildHoney777

2 ай бұрын

Christianity is the only true religion because it represents the standard of God correctly .. It is a standard which no amount of Good works by us can make us keep up to this standard... God is infinitely Holy... That is the definition of being God .. to have the highest level in all things, like God is the highest powerful one there is... The only way to reach the top of the mountain (and to be with the creator) is by believing in the alternative to 'works based salvation' , which is faith in Jesus being the Son of God, and that he died for our sins, and was raised again on the third day from the dead... (in order to accept this u have to admit that u are a sinful person ... sinful person need not be someone who sins every now and then .. you may be a peaceful person for 99days but then comes a day when someone annoyed you and you yelled at them because you were having a bad day ... that yelling is sinful ,and every little sin has very big , irreparable consequences... Even if you later on become a monk in life who has full control of emotions , you will still have to pay the price for the sins you have done in the past .. It is for these sins of you and me and many many generations whose price was too much and due to which there was no hope for the salvation of whole of humanity , that no amount of peace sacrifices was enough to repay for , That God sent his only son , Jesus, who was sinless and blameless, to die on the cross as the final and infinite sacrifice to cover all the sins of the past, present and future, for all who believe he was God and he died and raised from the dead again on the third day... )

@LoreFinder-li3jp

2 ай бұрын

Blah blah blah. None of you guys can prove crap. Jesus died a long time ago sure he was a great guy but there is like zero proof he was the son of god or that god even really exists all we got are some dusty tomes that have been rewritten a thousand times. No religion has any more chance to be real than any other. Yap all you want on sin and god it don’t matter.

@alecwelch1898

2 ай бұрын

@@LoreFinder-li3jp Reality and history are endlessly complex, no doubt. But there are top-grade scholars who have devoted lifetimes of study to unearthing evidence behind the claims of Christianity-some starting the journey as Christians, others converting along the way, and others still remaining unconvinced. If you have the endurance to test some of your claims, you might consider one of NT Wright’s or Tom Holland’s more academic works (for instance, “The Resurrection of the Son of God” or “Simply Jesus” (Wright) / “Dominion” (Holland)).

@gamebox8980

2 ай бұрын

​@@LocustsAndWildHoney777 the definition of what "being god" is doesn't really prove anything. You could argue that Christianity is wrong because in other languages, cultures and regions the definition of "being god" is completely different. Next all you're talking about is belief which is entirely subjective. Personally if I had to believe in a god I'd rather believe in one that values the, from my point of view, hard work and sacrifices which I do in an attempt to please them than in one that is ready to abandon me for making a very simple mistake once in my life no matter what. But that's still my subjective view which differs from yours and both can be seen as equally valid as there's no objective truth for either. Just don't try and claim any religion is more valid than another. Live and let live

@georgiamapping

2 ай бұрын

@@gamebox8980mathematically, God must exist. How can infinites exist in a finite area, and how does life exist if so many statistically improbable things had to happen for it to occur? Furthermore, there are several eyewitness accounts of Jesus’s life, and historically most scholars believe He existed. He rose from the dead, so He is God.

I’m gonna show your channel to my future kids and I hope it’ll be there favorite show😉

I’m about to binge all your vids!!

Such high quality videos so consistently. Idk how you do it

God doesn’t attempt, God does. Christianity is the way that God saves.

@Pomni740

2 ай бұрын

jesus is not the messiah he didn't fulfill the messianic prophecies.

@SantiagoJIL

7 күн бұрын

Jesus is Lord 🙏❤️✝️👑

Can't ignore and just get to another video, my brother, I don't know who you are, But This really made up as a great deal, The Animation style was awesome, and the story was amazing. You really deserve for this effort. May our Lord, Jesus Christ, Only Son of the Father, Splendor and Figure of His Substance, Bless You. AMEN.

@UnderatedTotalWarPlayer

2 ай бұрын

yyes

the animation is awesome, I love the simplicity.

awesome video mate, keep it up

I love this allegory. I also love the animation. Beautiful ❤

Please understand that what I am about to post is meant to be respectful, and in search of knowledge ONLY. I am a spiritual person who believe in God, by whatever name he is called, and that we go on after our bodies die. However, with that said, I have a very hard time believing in religions. Doesn't it seem a bit arrogant, for lack of a better word for Christians to believe that theirs is the ONLY path to God? It's only 2000 years old. This, to me, implies that anyone, no matter their deeds on earth will burn in the lake of fire for no other sin that believing in 1 or the worlds 4000+ other religions. The Christian bible has so many translations, and versions, which one is correct? I've read that Jesus' name wasn't even Jesus. If you went back in time and called him that he would say you have him mistaken for someone else, and introduce himself by his real name, as it was written before the bible was translated. If God, a being who is all powerful wanted to reach us, he has only to show himself. I just lost my father a few months ago. One of my very devout Christian friends asked he was was a believer. I told her no, and her comment as, "Well, you never know what a person believes before their death," implying that he went to hell. Again . . . this is very arrogant to think that there is only ONE path to God that only appeared 2000 years ago. I truly respect your beliefs, as I do everyone's as well. I am simply looking for clarity on this subject. Thank you for reading this, and I hope none of you took offense and understand my questions. I welcome your responses.

@localsewerrat2149

2 ай бұрын

I have answers to a couple of your questions. The first one I can answer is about bible translations. Yes there are lots of bible translations but almost all of them are nearly the exact same but with different phrasing. There are a few outliers but the largest difference amongst them that I know of is simply the manner of Jesus being crucified (even then only about 1% at most will differ from the majority. 0% if we only count those that are faithful to the thousands of original greek manuscripts.) I’ve done lots of research on this topic and can confidently say that the most a translation will differ from the original bible is

@asherpikesgoldenmoralcinem5770

2 ай бұрын

The answer is actually a lot more joyous than you might think. To answer your main question, the Bible says that if a person believes in faith, hope, love, and a few other morals, then they believe in God even without knowing it is God. This is great because it means that those who never heard of Jesus, his father, and the bible, but who believed in what God and Jesus stands for, believe in them. What this means is that, belief in God, truly, is the belief in that which is good and true and helps people. Because, who is God? God is the creator, what is the creator? The force of creation itself, that which “builds” and sustains life, that which wants well-being for people. There is also free will, people have free will and some people do evil things. God allows time so that some who make mistakes, have the chance to reflect and fix their mistakes. Such is the tragedy of peoples choices though, that some peoples lives are cut short, however God knows all these things, and knowing that God is %100 perfect, do you think he would discard your father just because he didn’t believe in the (surface level) face of some warped version of god that the media says is god? If anything, it’s good that he did not believe in that view of god which many believe in. God is the force of creation, “let there be light” was his first words, that is who God is. Genesis chapter 1, if u wanna know who God is, read that chapter, see what God does to see who he is. Also, sometimes you will encounter those who say God has done horrible things in the bible, in older, (closer to the written date) translations though, it’s quite clear that wasn’t the case. Don’t worry mate, the truth is how it’s always been. Helping people, being kind, being honest, truthful, directing yourself along the pathway to the highest possible good, THAT is God, it’s always been that way. And just naturally that gets rid of a lot of religions in the world. That which helps, and does not hurt good people. That is who God is.

@christopherpearson2116

2 ай бұрын

@@asherpikesgoldenmoralcinem5770 That's nice. Since that means they may never have to read disgusting 2 Samuel 24, Deuteronomy 21... or Leviticus 25, along the way then? And thus remain, quite clean as regards those... woeful... floppy... things? It also means that even if all 'fall short of the glory'... then they are allowed to try, at least.

@asherpikesgoldenmoralcinem5770

2 ай бұрын

@@christopherpearson2116 I think there are many cases in the bible which the Lord God presented to clearly show people cases of when some elders take things too far and use the Lord God’s name in vain. So many people in history have used the Lord God’s name in vain. So the example say of the seer telling David the Lord gives him three options and then the Lord was responsible for killing the people and had to be stopped, yeah it’s not my opinion that that goes out of character for God, God created the universe he is the force that builds, yes he kills evil people but not innocents, unless somehow it was proven that he made sure to only kill the most, most, horrible, terrible, downright evil people of all in the land at that time, then yeah sorry somethings up with the verse. It’s there for a reason and we can talk about that. But, objectively speaking, what created the universe, 1 or 0? It’s a mathematical equation, 0 x 1 (or nothingness multiplies by the force that makes or builds or is positive) = 0. So that could not have made the universe, 1 x 1 = 1. The x symbol can be switched out with any other symbol and it works too. For example, 0+1 In that equation, 0 (nothingness) adds (+) creation (1) to nothing (0) but if 1 is added to nothing, then nothing never added anything, so therefore there is no such thing as. 0 +, therefore 0 never added 1, therefore the equation itself doesn’t exist objectively. You can do it with the divide symbol too. It’s completely objective mathematics. The force of creation or positivity, structure, stability, existence, created creation. That’s the only logically possible, objective truth that answers the question. So then, knowing that God is pure positivity, not negativity, do people really think that a few outlier verses saying that God the force of pure creation kills innocent people-is going to be objectively sound? No they don’t, it’s not possible. Instead they think that a shallow-media-presented view of God - who is evil - is wrong - and they would be right except that they haven’t looked for the alternative which is the true God. So it isn’t a matter of trying to justify the actions of the shallow-view-evil-god. That is just akin to Satan, it’s good that people noticed that was wrong, but they haven’t bothered trying to find the view of God which is objectively right, and that is God who is actually %100 good and true. So when I try to make discussion of how a few outlier verses saying god did something evil, must be either misinterpreted, mistranslated, or examples of false seers or excuses made by societies to justify their actions (put on display in the bible so people can clearly see God did NOT intend or do those things but that it may have been examples of corruption) it is from the source of me knowing very strongly that the only possible being that could have created existence itself could not possibly have a shred within his soul. Once you look at the bible in that light, things become clear but you have to remember you yourself may have done evil things in life, so you have to be very humble and you may be wrong sometimes, but in the end what I know is that, existence was made by existence, positivity made positivity, not 0. So on that certain truth, I would say it’s justified to look at the bible in that new way. But also to recognise I may be wrong about my interpretations and, that’s because I’m not the force of pure creation like God, and because that is an evil within me that, if I am anything close to being a person who wants to be with pure positivity (God) - I should fight to destroy that evil, or else my views would have a strong possibility of being warped by that evil into things that may be hurtful to others. As for the second chapter you mentioned, I believe it is strongly confirmed ow by multiple scholars that the words “take a woman captive” was a complete mistranslation. So that’s out of the way %100 and is well known as a mistranslation. But again, it may be the case that some verses are there, where Israelites write out their rules (not all are claimed to be made by God) that they are there to showcase how some rules are not morally sound and some are, just by being presented in full light. The idea that the bible is divine, is correct, but the idea that all the rules and things in it are seen as good by God is objectively wrong, there are so many opinions and viewpoints about life that God sees is evil, that it’s clear that God does not agree with all the view points put forth about him, not by any culture and not by the Israelites either. So again, we can be wrong about it interpretations but to mistake God as doing evil things rather than just showcasing when societies claim he allows evil things - using his name as justification - that those events are shown as lessons of when people are wrong, and in that way the bible is not corrupted but the obvious corruption of God’s name is shown as a lesson by God In many cases. Some more clearly than others. So these outlier texts that are way out from God’s character, may well be within that or some similar category. God is not evil. Also, Jesus did away with hundreds of old rules, leaving only two, Love the Lord your God, and love your neighbour as thyself, so it’s quite possible that the reason for doing away with hundreds of those old rules, was because, many of those old rules we’re corrupt, corrupted, made originally in god’s name but weren’t commanded by God, or otherwise. We don’t know definitively which ones were made corruptly or not, but we can obviously see that the outliers were either mistranslated or were examples f some rules that were done away with because they were evil, either one. So Jesus I guess answers this question quite well, because he actually dealt with it.

@asherpikesgoldenmoralcinem5770

2 ай бұрын

@@christopherpearson2116 I think there are many cases in the bible which the Lord God presented to clearly show people cases of when some elders take things too far and use the Lord God’s name in vain. So many people in history have used the Lord God’s name in vain. So the example say of the seer telling David the Lord gives him three options and then the Lord was responsible for killing the people and had to be stopped, yeah it’s not my opinion that that goes out of character for God, God created the universe he is the force that builds, yes he kills evil people but not innocents, unless somehow it was proven that he made sure to only kill the most, most, horrible, terrible, downright evil people of all in the land at that time, then yeah sorry somethings up with the verse. It’s there for a reason and we can talk about that. But, objectively speaking, what created the universe, 1 or 0? It’s a mathematical equation, 0 x 1 (or nothingness multiplies by the force that makes or builds or is positive) = 0. So that could not have made the universe, 1 x 1 = 1. The x symbol can be switched out with any other symbol and it works too. For example, 0+1 In that equation, 0 (nothingness) adds (+) creation (1) to nothing (0) but if 1 is added to nothing, then nothing never added anything, so therefore there is no such thing as. 0 +, therefore 0 never added 1, therefore the equation itself doesn’t exist objectively. You can do it with the divide symbol too. It’s completely objective mathematics. The force of creation or positivity, structure, stability, existence, created creation. That’s the only logically possible, objective truth that answers the question. So then, knowing that God is pure positivity, not negativity, do people really think that a few outlier verses saying that God the force of pure creation kills innocent people-is going to be objectively sound? No they don’t, it’s not possible. Instead they think that a shallow-media-presented view of God - who is evil - is wrong - and they would be right except that they haven’t looked for the alternative which is the true God. So it isn’t a matter of trying to justify the actions of the shallow-view-evil-god. That is just akin to Satan, it’s good that people noticed that was wrong, but they haven’t bothered trying to find the view of God which is objectively right, and that is God who is actually %100 good and true. So when I try to make discussion of how a few outlier verses saying god did something evil, must be either misinterpreted, mistranslated, or examples of false seers or excuses made by societies to justify their actions (put on display in the bible so people can clearly see God did NOT intend or do those things but that it may have been examples of corruption) it is from the source of me knowing very strongly that the only possible being that could have created existence itself could not possibly have a shred of evil within his soul. Once you look at the bible in that light, things become clear but you have to remember you yourself may have done evil things in life, so you have to be very humble and you may be wrong sometimes, but in the end what I know is that, existence was made by existence, positivity made positivity, not 0. So on that certain truth, I would say it’s justified to look at the bible in that way. But also to recognise I may be wrong about my interpretations and, that’s because I’m not the force of pure creation like God, and because that is an evil within me that, if I am anything close to being a person who wants to be with pure positivity (God) - I should fight to destroy that evil, or else my views would have a strong possibility of being warped by that evil into things that may discredit God. As for the second chapter you mentioned, I believe it is strongly confirmed now by multiple scholars that the words “take a woman captive” was a complete mistranslation. So that’s out of the way %100 and is well known as a mistranslation. But again, it may be the case that some verses are there, where Israelites write out their rules (not all are claimed to be made by God) that they are there to showcase how some rules are not morally sound and some are, just by being presented in full light. The idea that the bible is divine, is correct, but the idea that all the rules and things in it are seen as good by God is objectively wrong, there are so many opinions and viewpoints about life that God sees is evil, that it’s clear that God does not agree with all the view points put forth about him, not by any culture and not by the Israelites either. So again, we can be wrong about it interpretations but to mistake God as doing evil things rather than just showcasing when societies claim he allows evil things - using his name as justification - that those events are shown as lessons of when people are wrong, and in that way the bible is not corrupted but the obvious corruption of God’s name is shown as a lesson by God In many cases. Some more clearly than others. So these outlier texts that are way out from God’s character, may well be within that or some similar category. God is not evil. Also, Jesus did away with hundreds of old rules, leaving only two, Love the Lord your God, and love your neighbour as thyself, so it’s quite possible that the reason for doing away with hundreds of those old rules, was because, many of those old rules we’re corrupt, corrupted, made originally in god’s name but weren’t commanded by God, or otherwise. We don’t know definitively which ones were made corruptly or not, but we can obviously see that the outliers were either mistranslated or were examples of some rules that were done away with because they were evil, either one. So Jesus I guess answers this question quite well, because he actually dealt with it and proved objectively what Gods nature is.

“My book is the right one out of all the rest.” Whole video in summary.

@yourboi5425

2 ай бұрын

The truth

@blackholeguy1529

2 ай бұрын

true

@Zeni-th.

2 ай бұрын

Lol

@flowersandlace

2 ай бұрын

the truth is only ever one.

@chrisr6120

Ай бұрын

Lmaooo. So many flaws in the books, there used to be many more but you know through translations and time you can change it up and tweak it to make sure the non believers don’t have any good points. 😂

Nice story, but do you have a single shred of evidence?

@arohk4415

Ай бұрын

His Holy book said so. 😂

@blackpope8834

Ай бұрын

@arohk4415 ahhh, yes, the holy book that cadones owning people and treating women as property. The holy book that says worship me or I'll punish you for eternity. What a loving god, lol. The holy book that was written 100 years after Jesus died. The book with dozens of writers, yet you think it has univocality.

@blackpope8834

Ай бұрын

@@arohk4415 do you believe everything your parents tell you?

@arohk4415

Ай бұрын

@@blackpope8834 of course not, but who are you arguing against here? i am on your side :3

@blackpope8834

Ай бұрын

@@arohk4415 oh lol, I was arguing against Christianity, which I misinterpreted you for being lmao

So the collective noun for a group of mountaineers is a "bundle"? Who knew? 😂

@mgntstr

2 ай бұрын

the original term is not politically correct, wonder how long bundle will last.

@cheekguardian1378

2 ай бұрын

​@@mgntstrwhat is the original term

In a night at 1am, at my greatest doubts and inner suffering, this video popped up for me. Words cannot express how much I've needed this at the moment, thank you. Bless Jesus!

Amazing analogy and story telling ability, loved how you describe the antagonists in the story as well. Bless your heart and soul my brother in Jesus Christ

Was thinking you were talking about Krishna up until halfway through, but then I realized what the title was. Lol Praise Jesus Christ!

@ethannollola1613

2 ай бұрын

who?

@KitsuneShapeShifter

2 ай бұрын

@@ethannollola1613 you know: Jesus Christ, the Son of God; how do you not know this?

@ethannollola1613

2 ай бұрын

@@KitsuneShapeShifter the other dude dumbass

@ethannollola1613

2 ай бұрын

@@KitsuneShapeShifter no who is kristna

@KitsuneShapeShifter

2 ай бұрын

@@ethannollola1613 Ooooh, sorry, lol, now I get it! :D Well Krishna is some ancient hindu god who incarnated into human form about 3000BC to walk amongst men as one of them in order to become their savior, preached a kind of hindu enlightenment through devotion to God and himself, and performed miracles, only to finally ascend at the end into the heavens while alive (Enoch style); As you can see, there’s a few vague overlaps; But unlike Lord Jesus Christ he never died for our sins and resurrected into eternal life. Isn’t religious history and mythology fun though? :) Anyway, this was a wonderful video! I hope it gets more people to accept Jesus Christ as their Lord and Savior! With so much sin in the world these days, we need more wholesome Christian content! Praise Jesus Christ!! The Truth, the Way and the Life! I love Him!

I wish Christians would spread the Good News of their gospel without constantly trying to demean other religions. Fact is you don't know what you are talking about when you talk about other religions. You don't need to know about other religions if you are a Christian. You can and should focus all your energy on knowing Christ. But when you start asserting your superiority to other religions you ironically obligate yourself to focus on other religions so that you are not speaking from ignorance. It's better to focus on Christ and be poor in spirit (humble) like Jesus instructed.

@Mr.Dodo-

2 ай бұрын

Depends on the situation.

@Servant_of_the_Lotus_feet

2 ай бұрын

Agreed. There is nothing wrong in speaking of other religious philosophies as long as you are well-versed in those philosophies, and I agree that most apologetics/ preachers (including this one) lack enough knowledge to speak of other religious philosophies.

@arthurarmour5480

2 ай бұрын

It is just spreading the idea that for Christianity all you have to do is accept Gods ultimate forgiveness and does not rely on good acts even though good actions would be a byproduct of believers. This isn’t apparent in many of today’s religions. I don’t see what is wrong with that. Yes the title is clickbait but besides that I think it is a very reasonable video.

@harmonyrpt

2 ай бұрын

@@arthurarmour5480 again Christians are under no obligation to understand other religions. The message of this video required no reference to other religions. But as soon as you start making comparisons and especially asserting superiority you obligate yourself to know what you are talking about. The maker of this video does not know what he is talking about when it comes to the other religions he claims Christianity is superior to.

@arthurarmour5480

2 ай бұрын

@@harmonyrpt He never said Christianity was superior to other religions he fairly stated the characteristics of Christianity and he stated characteristics of other religions that were relatively true statements. Like he alluded to the five pillars of Islam and Jewish Kosher. I don’t think they are bad or anything like good thing people are trying to provide for the poor. But as Christians we are not obligated to do anything other than truly and fully accept Gods forgiveness and as a byproduct we would act in a way similar to God. Now we most definitely are not perfect and there are a lot of false Christians out there. But we don’t have the same forced regulations as other religions do. This doesn’t go for all such as Buddhism but it does apply to many. He just gave insights on Christianity for believers and non believers. He never gave disinformation to others.

Excellent break down of the story!

Christianity’s greatest deception has always been the lie that God did not love creation before Jesus Christ, to assume wrongfully that God requires a semi-human sacrifice to “forgive people of their sins” is such a villainous way to think about God, It truly is a tragedy. God does not need a fake ambassador to lobby on behalf of mankind, God created us with all of our flaws and all of our imperfections, and to God that is actually his beautiful intention.

"Just because a religion has a different approach to salvation than others doesn’t automatically make it true. The fact that it’s different makes it interesting, but not necessarily valid. Captivating as it might be, it is just as arbitrary." I agree.

@munashedominicfudgemabvoro

Ай бұрын

Our Religion tells us that there is only one true God and only one way to salvation which is through Jesus Christ our Lord and saviour. Anything else is Heresy to us.

@Jm_trivialminds

Ай бұрын

If there’s 44000 plus religions one above all has to be true and that happens to be Christianity ✝️ not only cuz it’s actually the religion that made improvements for the first time on a shift of morality all around the world but because Jesus and his miracles are the most proven historical facts of all time there is literally more evidence for Jesus and his rising from the dead then there is for napoleon or Christopher Columbus but no one doubts are not real people the cross is the axis on witch the whole world spins Christianity is the only religion you can factually prove and not only that but all the religions that popped up after Christianity talk about a Christ like figure they basically say that there is a man and they basically just describe Christ who could do all the things that he said that he did but we can do those too, but then when you actually go to the historical words of Jesus himself, he says I am the way the truth the life no one can go to the father except through me all the religions talk about Christ and say that he is one of the ways, but we are too, and then Christ himself only gives Creedence to himself as I am the only way so if all of them points to him and he points to himself the only logical conclusion you could have is that Christ is who he said he his

@Jm_trivialminds

Ай бұрын

44,000+ religions and only one empty tomb only one with evidence

@jamonieshorts6500

Ай бұрын

@@munashedominicfudgemabvoro True victims of exploitation is all im hearing.

@L154N4LG4IB

Ай бұрын

@@Jm_trivialmindsdo you have evidence of the tombs location and it being empty? Kinda strange for you to claim when you can’t even locate said tomb and observe its artifacts, just saying.

This was an excellent video and the animation is giving me heavy The Last Airbender vibes good stuff

beautifully said, awesome animation, keep up the good work!

I didn't expect any logical arguments, but to hear non at all is rather disappointing and makes it an unconvincing case

@LordMagnuss

Ай бұрын

That's christians for you.

@Mr.Dodo-

Ай бұрын

Its logical reasoning. To summarize the video: How can you enter perfect paradise if you are imperfect? Answer: You are made perfect. How? By Jesus Christ sacrafice who payed for our sin. So why are other relegion false, because they make the illogical statement that you can enter a perfect place while being imperfect yourself.

@erikvoitus7488

Ай бұрын

@@Mr.Dodo- Christianity is true because Christianity is true, sounds a bit circulair

“Why is Christianity the only true religion?” more like “I yap about something that’s already been said 100k times so that Christians can find another excuse to believe something unreal”

@Mr.Dodo-

Ай бұрын

Its logical reasoning. To summarize the video: How can you enter perfect paradise if you are imperfect? Answer: You are made perfect. How? By Jesus Christ sacrafice who payed for our sin. So why are other relegion false, because they make the illogical statement that you can enter a perfect place while being imperfect yourself.

@Spugler2

Ай бұрын

@@Mr.Dodo- You literally just said "My religion is true because it is, and everything else isn't because it isn't"

@Vimideye

Ай бұрын

You will never receive 100% proof that’s why it takes faith, I received proof because I had faith in Jesus and he’s opened my eyes so if your just gonna sit here wanting 100% proof I’m here to tell you you will never get that from anything.

stellar work brother. i pray the narrow gate be always illuminated for you.

This is a beautiful reframing of the perennialist mountain metaphor for salvation. I’m so glad you made this video

This isn’t an argument for Christianity being true. It’s an argument to why it works best. But every religion can make an argument for that & were left not being able to measure its success

@frobrain

2 ай бұрын

Not exactly.

@frb906

2 ай бұрын

success relative to what

@christopherpearson2116

2 ай бұрын

But if it doesn't really fulfil John 14:12 (a particular, and unique claim in many ways) Then... how does it work best? Let alone routinely fulfil it.

@Kovi_99

2 ай бұрын

@@frb906 Relative to other religions

@Kovi_99

2 ай бұрын

@@christopherpearson2116 What do you mean?

I do not understand how this proves that christianity is the true faith

I love your videos great anology man May God bLess you 🙏🏿

This animation is super dope! 🙌🏽

Well done animation style, but you're information is off and not very educated when it comes to other religions. Christians (protestants mostly) have this fallacy that their religion is the only one with the concept of "God's grace" and everyone else tries to achieve salvation by their own "works". This concept of grace and "means of grace" is present in Hinduism and Buddhism. In Bhagavad Gita, any good man achieves, any piety, understanding etc cannot occur without "the causeless mercy" of God. They also have means of forgiveness of sins. Main Land Buddhism even has the same exact notion of "substitutionary atonement" Christians are so proud of.

@XenoxHD

2 ай бұрын

Mark 10:18 “Why do you call me good?” Jesus answered. “No one is good-except God alone. What is your definition of “good man”? I believe as a Christian I cannot truly ever be good, and it is Christ in and through me that leads me day by day in living a little more like Jesus!

@seneynah

2 ай бұрын

Can you explain the substitution atonement of Buddhism? I think Buddhism and Christianity are closer than we think. I’d like to learn more.

@spagghettiwarrior66

2 ай бұрын

@@seneynah hi, this is a facet of Pure Land Buddhism. it involves faith in the Buddha to atone or substitute for one not being able to live up to the high standards he set in the eight-fold path. it's a more recent development. there's different sects and interpretations. there's also Theravada, which is more old school, and Zen and others, but you might want to research Pure Land Buddhism.

@spagghettiwarrior66

2 ай бұрын

@@seneynah I'm a Catholic but I've always been interested in these things. Hindu Vaisnava authorities also view Jesus as an Avatar (incarnation of God). the Bhagavad Gita in my opinion is the most fascinating eastern religious book IMO, especially the translation andd commentary by AC Bhatkivedanta Swami.

@arthurarmour5480

2 ай бұрын

I agree Buddhism and Christianity are very similar. I believe there are even mentions of Jesus in their religion but don’t quote me on that.

This is amazing! Great storytelling! and its such a fun and good visually supporting animation style!

I recently became agnostic after seeing my dad almost die in the hospital. I guess you could say I’m agnostic to avoid acknowledging hell, but the more that I tried to convince my dad to convert, the less reasonable the faith seemed to me. For example, you said that hell is where souls are tormented because they are eternally separated from God, but according to revelations 21:8 (“But for the cowardly and unbelieving and abominable and murderers and immoral persons and sorcerers and idolaters and all liars, their part will be in the lake that burns with fire and brimstone, which is the second death.”) it says that those people will be casted into a lake of fire. I’m going to assume that the devil didn’t create the lake of fire themselves considering the fact that the bible mentions that demons are tormented there as well, but it seems like the fire is brings more torture compared to torment. This makes sense since Mathew 25:46 says “And these will go away into eternal punishment, but the righteous into eternal life.” This means that hell is a place of torment/separation and torture/punishment for the sinners according to this verse. I’m also confused as to why hell has to be forever. The Bible often describes hell as a place of weeping and gnashing of teeth that filled with fire and sulfur. In the faith we are told that everyone is going to end up in hell unless we repent and follow Jesus because we deserve it. I’m not trying to say that humans don’t deserve punishment, but I just don’t understand how we could deserve something that horrible for eternity. Likewise, I don’t think we deserve something as perfect as Heaven either. Earth is an imperfect place where both our environment, animals, and humans often all act out of order. And although we have more knowledge to do good and evil, we are still victim to this disease of imperfection. But just because we’re imperfect doesn’t mean we deserve hell. I also think we are being misrepresented on judgement day. According to the bible, 1/3 of the angels fell into hell. However, according to Matthew 7:13-14 ““Enter by the narrow gate. For the gate is wide and the way is easy that leads to destruction, and those who enter by it are many. For the gate is narrow and the way is hard that leads to life, and those who find it are few.” The idea that the majority of humanity will end up in hell makes sense (though not for the reasons that this verse is implying) since according to worldatlas.com more than 30% of the global population identify as Christians (so less than 70% are unbelievers and are in danger of falling into hell). The Bible says that the severity of God’s judgment varies according to how much knowledge a person possesses (Luke 12:48). The fallen angels, then, with the great knowledge they possessed, are greatly deserving of God’s wrath. This means that because of the knowledge that the angels had, they can’t be redeemed because they choose not to be redeemed (because they fully know what they are doing (1 Peter 5:8). If all humans were completely aware and knowledgable about the dangers of hell, then A) we probably wouldn’t be having this conversation about whether or not hell exists and B) the majority of humanity would most likely do everything in their power to avoid this fate. However, the bible says that people end up here simply because they choose worldly pleasures and comfort over having a meaningful life, which is just false because God also states that the unbelievers will end up in hell along with the murderers (revelations 21:8.) Considering the fact that John 3:16 states that whoever believes in Jesus will have eternal life, we can assume that those who do not believe yet still live a righteous life of good morals still has a good chance of falling into hell. I believe that if God created mankind good and in His image, then deep down in our soul everyone should be good and want the same thing which is to be with The Creator/God. However, because we are imperfect, we manifest in more of a shell than our true identities because of our earthly nature. However, I believe that if we are truly made good, then if all mankind knew the truth of God and felt it within them, then no one would willingly indulge in sin again. However, people come to know God at certain points in their lives and you can’t predict when. That’s why you can’t necessarily judge someone’s eternity based on the bad deeds they’ve done up to a certain point because they may not have found the truth yet, but it doesn’t mean that they are incapable of doing so… edit: i think in order to make earth a place where people are more able to find the truth is A) knowing who the true God is and the morals should almost be innate to us so that there is no confusion about the rules of life and 2) because we are infinite beings and earth is just a race, we should be given enough time to find the truth. Therefore if someone dies and goes to hell, it means they weren’t given enough time or guidance to find the truth - this is a lot to ask, but by eliminating the obstacles of finding the true religion and giving enough time for each human, we are given a more fair race that focuses on our character development and journey of finding the goodness of God within us instead of doing an extra search for which religion is the correct one and punishing us for falling in our human nature for eternity, I’m not really sure if this makes any sense… I’m not a theologian or apologetic (if that’s how you spell it) in any way shape or form, I’m just an 18 year old who’s trying learn how to navigate this world. So if you have any evidence or opinions against my claims, I would really appreciate it since I’m very confused about the faith! Thanks again for your videos and thanks if you have read this far!

@Mr.Dodo-

2 ай бұрын

Don't you think the Almigthy God is in control? Before he judges someone he gave them a fair chance. If they die before that do you think our merciful god will send people to hell?

@VybeMusic-sg1ht

2 ай бұрын

@@Mr.Dodo- ​ @Mr.Dodo- Considering the fact that Jesus is the only God that showed an example of true love compared to other religions, I don’t doubt that the God of Christianity is a merciful God. However, I think it is risky to assume that God is somehow applying more “fairness” when it comes to judgement when the “fairness” you might be trying to imply here clearly contradicts what He tells us in the Bible. Although He may be a merciful God, He states many times in the bible that the unbelievers will suffer the same fate as the other sinners. John 3:16 is one of the most famous quotes in Christianity which clearly states that in order to reach Heaven you must believe in Jesus Christ. James 2:10 also says that “For whoever keeps the whole law but fails in one point has become guilty of all of it.” meaning that no matter what we do, according to the Bible we need Jesus in order to achieve Heaven because we are imperfect, and that’s it. So to think that less than 70% of the world doesn’t believe in Jesus, it makes me wonder why the majority of people on earth today will probably end up in hell according to the bible (the gate is wide and many will follow, the path to Heaven is narrow and few will follow) but thank you for replying, usually people don’t read my messages so thank you so much for responding, :)

@christopherpearson2116

2 ай бұрын

@@Mr.Dodo- And when He needs to throw a paddy and slay 70,000 people who are taken in a census, I suppose? Yes - control, of a kind. So - why did Satan keep any powers? And did Bathsheba's baby... find Him... merciful? As, he died. Quite slowly... as I recall? Still - control: of a sort. Also - any desire to sin... began, in heaven.

Great explanation, great explanation, amazing video

Some may wash, some may refrain from certain foods. Only the pure in heart will see God.

@hillymine

2 ай бұрын

No, only those who accept Jesus Christ as their lord and savior, this meaning you love him with all your heart, you serve him and glorify in his name, will see God.

@theriveroffaith852

2 ай бұрын

@@hillymine Matthew 5:8 "Blessed are the pure in heart: for they shall see God." You can't honestly accept Jesus without a pure and repentant heart. Mark 1:15 "And saying, The time is fulfilled, and the kingdom of God is at hand: repent ye, and believe the gospel."

@user-ej6el2zp6f

2 ай бұрын

@@theriveroffaith852Fantasy wars!

@theriveroffaith852

2 ай бұрын

@@user-ej6el2zp6f There's no moral reasoning without God.

@dI9ESTIVES123

2 ай бұрын

@@theriveroffaith852 there absolutely is moral reasoning without God. There’s an entire branch of philosophy dedicated to ethics and it doesn’t presume a supreme moral authority. In fact presuming that there is a supreme moral authority shuts down the need for ‘reasoning’ at all, since there’s no need to debate something that has black and white answers. That’s not the case though.

This whole video is just one big phallacy that any religion could argument, making it irrelevant.

@Mr.Dodo-

Ай бұрын

Its logical reasoning. To summarize the video: How can you enter perfect paradise if you are imperfect? Answer: You are made perfect. How? By Jesus Christ sacrafice who payed for our sin. So why are other relegion false, because they make the illogical statement that you can enter a perfect place while being imperfect yourself.

@EuryalusVolcens

Ай бұрын

@@Mr.Dodo- for that you have the dogmatic rules of christianity as basis, and you could argue the same way with other systems of belief. You have the presumed notion that first the perfect paradise exists, which granted most systems do to so it's not the big problem, but mostly that you can't achieve wholeness in any other way. You assume so without any weight, because a buddhist monk will say you can achieve perfection only by yourself and his opinion holds as much value as yours. So yes it is a phallacy because you base it on preconceived notions that are dogmatic and not based on a universal logic.

@Mr.Dodo-

Ай бұрын

@@EuryalusVolcens The monks opnions is valued the same as mine, but that does not mean it makes logical sense. How is living life in a way imaginable make up for the mistakes you have made. Its just not possible. Its like having a doctor in court saying that he should get off the murder trial, because he saved a lot of people. It doesnt make him any less guilty and imperfect.

@EuryalusVolcens

Ай бұрын

@@Mr.Dodo- every religion has a system for attonance, the difference is in whether you agree with their system, because it is just as valid as yours. Both have millenia of phylosophy and thought put into it, and both have a sizeable following. Muslims have the tawba, hinduists have purification rituals, taoists have scriptures and repentance rituals. The main difference between christianity and the religions i mentioned are that in christianity you assume your sins are paid for by the death of Jesus, while in the ones i mentioned yours sins are forgiven by the respective god/gods due to personal sacrifice and inner work. It is as logical as yours, so you can't say it isn't both a phallacy for assuming you're more right than the others as well as a belittlement of others beliefs by thinking of your moral support as superior.

@christopherpearson2116

Ай бұрын

@@Mr.Dodo- Heaven wasn't perfect anyway. So why should we expect things to turn out better, this time? Civil wars in perfect realms pervaded by spirit, presence and knowledge... are ludicrous. As is calling anything in Deuteronomy or Leviticus, timeless... or useful. Beyond a few crumbs. Meantime, in the Job story... Satan entered paradise with hardly any fuss. Seemed like his delusional attitude got much respect too: and his questions.

This is really well explained my guy, thank you and God bless

This is a cool animation. Great job.

I think this is well done! Animation is not too much ,but just enough. Good storytelling. " may we show the love of Jesus through our actions." Never give up on God.

While watching this video I kept thinking "what a silly story" or "that doesn't make any sense" or "that doesn't follow at all" or "this gotta be satire, right?" or "that's a wrong premise". But what's even more frightning: The video actually presents christianity rather fairly, I think.

@pinary5185

2 ай бұрын

I'm genuinely curious, what seems satirical or silly to you? I mean it is obviously a metaphorical story, so it's silly in that sense, but what actually seems this way to you?

@7dayspking

2 ай бұрын

@@pinary5185 how manipulative it is.

@pinary5185

2 ай бұрын

@@7dayspking Manipulative is a surprising word choice to me as it seems to me that they, the creators of this video, are just attempting to create an analogy to explain an aspect of their worldview, which could be argued as being inherently "manipulative" in the sense that it may effect and change people's beliefs, but it definitely doesn't seem to be a negative manipulation in that they're trying to or unintentionally, which is more debatable, harm someone else. I guess I would ask, what makes this video manipulative to you beyond what is normal or appropriate in sharing your worldview with someone else?

@7dayspking

2 ай бұрын

@@pinary5185 'why christianity is the only true religion'. 'the mountain THEORY'. Neither is seen in the video. What's their 'theory' anyway? (More like analogy). That every religion but theirs are ignorantly trying to reach the Christian god in life because they're too dumb to know you can only reach them in death through Jesus. That every other religion made up a bunch of baseless BS assumptions about God's nature, which of course must still be the 'correct' Christian god, except the Christians. and that these evil non christians murdered their jesus out of Jealousy. Of course this Jesus was also the god manifested in human form. The analogy. Which they call a theory. Claims that christians invented compassionate behaviour after Jesus Descendant, because everyone else, who wasn't a Christian, was a violent, selfish, evil creature. Videos manipulative because Christianity is manipulative trash. Not to defend the other religions. Most of the ones referenced come from the same source as Christianity, and unlike what was implied in the video, they, along with Christians, were violent, intolerant barbarians, and many still are.

@TR13400

2 ай бұрын

Don't be frightened, just have faith in Jesus!

Amen everyone we need you on this side let’s go!

Truthful and enjoyable in presentation, my brother.

Nice animation style, and a nice little story. However, it doesn't bring forth any arguments to actually support the claim made in the title. It presents Christianity as a fundamentally different religion, but that's not the case, besides maybe having reached the most followers (a title now slowly being lost to Islam). If you believe I missed something, or that I'm simply wrong, feel free to correct me in the replies, but please keep it civil : )

@josephoyinkan5480

2 ай бұрын

He explained that Religion is the attempt of men to reach God, but when Jesus came, he claimed he knew what was after death, of course, people thought he was mad, but by the time he started performing miracles that cannot be explained, men where in awe and they thought to themselves that maybe this man actually is from God, but not only did he claim to come from God, he claimed to be God. not just a god in the pantheon of Gods, but the God of the Jews "Yahweh", and this God is described as truly omnipotent, something that was not ascribed to any other "god" in both the current and ancient era's. This is why Christianity is true, because we believe the teachings and the miracles of Jesus.

@troggrog9136

2 ай бұрын

@@josephoyinkan5480 Yes, but, neither miracles or prophets are something unique to Christianity. (Zoroastrianism is a vastly older religion, monotheistic, and it features concepts quite similar to heaven, hell, the day of judgement, and even Satan) Even if we take the claim that Yahweh is the only god and the greater one as fact, we still have the question of Islam, that claims to be the final chapter of that story. (I'll avoid other arguments because I don't really want to make this comment section a mess, this isn't meant to be a fully religious debate ahaha.) The video was well made, and pleasant to watch. I just feel that If there's gonna be a title as absolute as this, the argument should be put in a way that at least tries to defend itself against people of different religions or no religion at all, otherwise it's not really helping to convince anybody.

@mcfloridaman2192

2 ай бұрын

Christianity is the only religion that recognizes that we alone cannot make it to heaven. Religions like Islam teach about working to heaven, that simply isn’t case. Christianity is the only religion that teaches we are all incapable of going to heaven. Hope thus helps

@casualfungaming4356

2 ай бұрын

@@mcfloridaman2192 and how, exactly, does that make all the other religions false and yours true?

@mcfloridaman2192

2 ай бұрын

@@casualfungaming4356 my point is to help understand Christianity, not prove whether it is true or false.

wait this is actually so good

God bless you and your ministry Brother 🎉

Thank you! Wonderful work

This really was an amazing illustration of perspective. Great work

My brother, that was unique. One of the best work ive seen. Makes everything clear and easy for everyone to undestand and leaves a suggestion for a decision on choosing Jesus or not. That was a great video. You are doing a video better than the previous one. I hope God bless your effort!

Great video!! God bless!

Amazing video, earned my subscription!

This was a beautiful video best way to explain Christianit and explain God and the holy Spirit and Jesus God bless your brother Jesus loves you Jesus is King 🙏❤️✝️

doesnt explain why it's the only true religion but ok

@TylerCarroll

Ай бұрын

Nope, really it just misinterprets all religions in a self defined obsurdity while never defining how or why it was absurd to begin with. Why? Because it ignored it's own mountaintop origin where man does ascend and meet G-d through Moses and all of Israel. The fun thing is Mt Sinai is a humble mountain because the Torah states it's own ease of access, saying that a god which makes right action impossible for his creation is essentially evil. This is the duality built in to early Christianity, they create a devil to justify the existence of a demiurge and fill that gap of evil VS evil with a new god one who is flesh and blood just like the Pharoahs and kings that enslaved the people of Israel and killed their Christian King. They claim it is a book of life but ignore the very real connection they have to ancient Egyptian mythos, it is a book of death one that claims salvation, freedom, and perfection is within the grave. It's a defeatest stance that spits in the face of the only gift they have, life. What do you get when you bow down to man? What do you get when your god is dead?

@chrisr6120

Ай бұрын

Who cares about explanation or scientific facts all you have to say is a beautiful metaphor and then say “because god 🥺” and that’s it’s .. why is the sky blue? Because god .. why do atoms have so much empty space in between them ? Because god . Why are some animals evolved to do certain things in their environment ? Because god. What’s 3+3? It equals god! Who cares about logic or anything else god is always the answer. Also who created the devil and can destroy him at anytime? I’ll let y’all answer that one .

@AnewYew444

Ай бұрын

I guess all Imma says is.... Let those who have eyes let them see, and those who have ears let them hear.

@chrisr6120

Ай бұрын

@@AnewYew444 what if they are like Helen Keller?

@malteburen825

22 күн бұрын

You are hopelessly intellectually dishonest

Interesting take brother very good video. If you haven’t already could you do a video about if Jesus died for all our sins, why we must repent? I’ve seen others videos but I’d like your take on the subject. Thank you once again 🙏🏾

Such a beatiful video. God bless you

Summary: My religion is true beacuse it says its true.

that wasnt even an argument man

This is the best explanation I've seen. Thank you.

This is an incredible display of the Gospel message. Great work please keep this up

Isn't believing in Christ a work you have to do? If so, what makes Christianity different? Also, why is Christianity being faith-based better? The only reason I see Christianity holding onto faith based salvation, is because of the belief that humans are intrinsically evil and aren't free to be good, from an outsider's perspective it doesn't make sense to me to believe that humans are entirely good or entirely evil. With works-based religions, they encourage learning and growth of character, you make some mistakes, you repent, you strive to be better. Christianity results in the same thing mostly, where people believe they are transformed and thus they strive to be better, but it seems like Christians are deprived of feeling good about their growth and their accomplishments, since fundamentally they say we all deserve to go to hell since we are scum for sinning. This doesn't seem like a good mindset to have, I believe in God, and I still give thanks to him as I grow in my character, but I know that some of that growth was due to my own effort, otherwise, is there even free will if a man's integrity is determined entirely by God? Like definitely God will assist you if you ask for it, I ask him everyday to make me a better person, but saying that I have no role in it isn't praiseworthy of God like Christians make it sound. It just means that some people were doomed to be evil, while others were lucky to be saved. What I think brings more glory to God is Him creating truly free beings that are able to grow and become great people through his help. Not creating people to be intrinsically evil, deserving of eternal torment at birth, but just flawed people with our own vices which we can grow out of if we so choose through our own self-determination with the assistance of God. I might've made a lot of assumptions in this comment, but I'm looking for what your perspective is. Currently, I'm a deist and I've heard this argument plenty of times and I don't really get what's valuable about it. At best, it makes Christianity unique, but that doesn't mean it's right.

As a Polytheist-Pagan, the Mountain Theory holds water in other religions too, in Chinese Polytheism, Sun Wukong, the Monkey King, was trapped underneath of a mountain. In Greek Polytheism, Mount Etna is where Typhon, the Father of Monsters is trapped, and Mount Olympus is the home of the Gods. Mount Zion was and STILL IS the Mountain of God, Mount Sinai was where Moses struck the rock, and made water flow from it. Even in modern day spirituality, Mount Shasta is whats called a "power spot", where supernaturally generated and unnatural looking clouds come down to heal Earth's soul, and there are FEW of these Power Spots left on Earth. Every religion has its own significant mountain, and there have been other significant mountains before. Mountains IN GENERAL are said to be supernatural in nature, as they are the origin points of Leylines, which are spiritual boundaries where different dimensions intertwine with one another. All religions are valid and true IN and OF themselves, none of them are false, is what I believe. I already know theres gonna be radical religionists in the replies telling me Im wrong and that I need to repent, but they only say it because they know that they themselves are wrong.

@DanielQualls-7777

2 ай бұрын

Polytheism is the gods' attempt to reach humanity.

@arthurarmour5480

2 ай бұрын

I think the “power spots” are really just weird places affected by nature causing strange weather and cloud patterns. You said there aren’t many left because that is most likely climate change.

@zemestukami4189

2 ай бұрын

haha u guys think u ar eoging to the right path but its not

@Jepperyful

2 ай бұрын

Glad you said that all religions are valid. Acts 4:12 “And there is salvation in no one else, for there is no other name under heaven given among men by which we must be saved.” If this is true other religions must not be true.

@DanielQualls-7777

2 ай бұрын

@@Jepperyful Its not true, and yet other religions are still disrespected DESPITE CHRISTIANITY BEING AROUND AFTER ALL OTHER RELIGIONS, NOT BEFORE THEM.

This is so well made

Great parable, if you will. Brilliant explanation of Christianity. I can just imagine this video opening with the phrase “the kingdom of God is like this:”

0 % logic

@arthurarmour5480

2 ай бұрын

Connection to the title yes otherwise there is logic.

The message was presented so nicely

Beautifully done! God bless you and Amen! 🙏

“Many are the roads to the summit but when reached there we have but one universal moonlight.”

How can we know there is somebody at the top of the mountain? (Atheism)

So basically "This is what my religion is, and my religion is why my religion is true!"

@Napoleon_Bonaparte1804

2 ай бұрын

yes

@crazenstarknight8704

2 ай бұрын

Is it right because it's his religion. Or is it his religion because it is right

@TheSuperemeGoat

2 ай бұрын

Tell me you didn’t watch the video without watching the video? You didn’t even understand anything he said

@saviofialho143

2 ай бұрын

Did You watch the vídeo without seeing it?

@marc56273

2 ай бұрын

He is pointing out that finding God on your own is impossible. Only God coming down to you will help you.

I heard about this theory just couldn’t understand thank you so much

Thank you for this video

0:00 start of a banger

Nice vid, nice drawings. A few problems: 1. Why is the Creator just sitting on top of a mountain instead of coming down to earth to, I don’t know, BE WITH the things he created? Why create them at all if he just wanted to leave them in silence? He would rather have them, who are so much less powerful and knowledgeable than him, do the hard and dangerous work of climbing all the way up, during which (or even BECAUSE of which) many of them die horrible, meaningless deaths without ever reaching the top. What a cruel and apathetic Creator to let them suffer like this, especially if all they really had to do to reach the top was just live a good life at the bottom and then die. Why hide that from them at all? Why withhold that and watch them suffer as they work toward an impossible goal? Why sit in silence and watch some of them write completely incorrect holy books instead of just telling them all what the deal was from the start? 2. Kind of convenient you just focused on ONE of the men who claimed to know the truth about the Creator. Weren’t there also dozens of other men around the world and across history claiming to know all the answers, and didn’t they also demonstrate their credibility through displays of supernatural power? What makes him the right one? How are the people to really know which was the right one? They can’t ALL have been the one… but they all could have NOT been. 3. Kind of convenient that all people somehow innately KNOW that there is a Creator without explaining where that belief came from, and you don’t account for any people that simply don’t believe in one because they see no evidence of one. And besides, if he’s just going to sit up there and not do anything or help out, what’s even the point? If he’s that disinterested in us that he doesn’t bother to come down or even shout down, then why should we bother to go up to him? 4. Kind of convenient that you didn’t include how the holy books have so many instances of the Creator divinely murdering people that he didn’t like and doing amazing things in some incredible past. It seems as though in the past he was actually incredibly involved in the world in very violent, destructive, and awe inspiring ways, and now he just isn’t doing any of that for some reason. Funny , how he was so willing to give tangible proof of himself before (in events localized entirely in the Bronze Age Middle East) and now he’s suddenly too good for that and decided arbitrarily that all his subjects should just have blind faith instead of real evidence. 5. Kind of convenient that you didn’t include all the millions of people and organizations throughout history who used that Creator as justification to eradicate whole groups of people and legislate against people they disagreed with, whether because it was written in the holy book that such people should be punished or because it was simply common prejudice that they used the book to justify. 6. Kind of biased and pessimistic to assume that the people who didn’t climb were simply languishing in misery and sorrow without accomplishing anything meaningful. No, clearly we should all be like the climbers, moving ever upward toward a meaningless goal that can be achieved without any of the effort, being dragged upward by dogmatic leaders who stamp out opposition and go to war and commit genocide, not only against other climbers, but against climbers simply in a different grouping of their own cluster, for differences of opinion, because everyone is so ABSOLUTELY CERTAIN that their cluster is right that they’re willing to kill for it. Clearly, we should devote our lives to struggle and self deprecation and toil for no appreciable returns in this life, all to appease the cruel, murderous, neglectful, lazy, questionably-real abusive father in the sky.

@Aussiebirds2024

2 ай бұрын

✝️

@Aizen-he3cy

2 ай бұрын

Bruh you made a crucial mistake in your first point,the Creator did came to Earth,His name Is Jesus,He is God incarnate,The second person of The Trinity

@calhof991

2 ай бұрын

@@Aizen-he3cy According to you, maybe. Many Christian denominations (like the one I grew up in) don’t accept the idea of the Trinity and believe Jesus to have been a separate entity from God (but I suppose you’ll tell me that those are all wrong and you just happen to to be in the “right” denomination, correct?). But whether Jesus was God or not, that still doesn’t counter the criticisms I made and it doesn’t solve the problem. The problem is that God is unlikely to exist because: 1. There is no observable, positive scientific evidence that he exists 2. There is no outstanding historical evidence (at least not any more than any other religion could provide, which boils down to “old book say it happen, therefore it happen”) 3. All the appeals to faith and the supernatural made by Christianity can be made by other religions just as easily, rendering any distinction meaningless beyond personal preference and therefore useless for objective and secular decision making (i.e. if your book says Jesus performed divine miracles and their book says Buddha or Muhammad performed divine miracles, clearly only one of these books, IF ANY, can be telling the truth and the rest are lies, so unless you can objectively prove that any one of them is telling the truth then it’s far more logical to assume that all of them are lying and that there is no supernatural) And lastly, all the excuses for why we can’t observe God and confirm his existence objectively are stupid. Period. If he wants everyone to follow him and believe in him, you’d think STEP 1 of that process would be making sure everyone undeniably knows he exists, correct? Otherwise how could he possibly expect us to follow him with any level of trust, much less know how to follow him correctly and choose the “right” denomination? And even IF there is a God, and even IF the Bible as it is written is an accurate depiction of him, he’s STILL a sociopathic, child murdering, tyrannical, violent, petty, selfish, slave driving dictator who CHOOSES violence at every provocation despite having all the power he needs to resolve things peacefully. He’s supposedly “perfect”, and yet everything went to crap on his watch when everything was under his full control. In short, he comes across as someone who isn’t even worth respecting, let alone loving or worshipping.

@webwarrior1.038

2 ай бұрын

@@calhof991 What about someone who respects the divine nature of each of His children and who allows us to make choices freely? We can choose to believe or not, we choose to act selflessly or not. He gave a perfect example through Jesus Christ that we can freely ignore. Instead of evidence or blind faith, we can freely approach Him in prayer.

@asherpikesgoldenmoralcinem5770

2 ай бұрын

Hello I hope you are having a very good day, You are right to criticise the video, it is very misinformed. However it has heart. Here are my personal answers for your questions, if you would be interested to consider them 1-After a lot of, seeing the evidence available in life, it’s clear to me that God is the force of that which creates, the force of creation itself. That is to say, he is that which “builds” and holds all structures together, he is structure and stability itself. He is peace, truth, etc. So with that clarified, no, he is not sitting on top of a mountain so to speak - in the way which makes him seem like a tyrant. God is goodness itself and that is within us in our hearts. Statistical analysis reveals that over %95 of all people who ever lived agreed on atleast one or 2 of 10 or so central evil things being objectively evil, and on one or two of 10 good things in life being objectively good. If we look into each topic within life even more closely, it’s clear that say, %95 of mothers in all history, based on all the sources we have available to support the claim - agree that losing a child is an objectively horrible thing. And if that and the countless other topics of the human experience - where the vast majority agree on what is good or evil - does not objectively disprove the claim of moral subjectivity or disagreement - then there is also the biological fact of any human being if they have their senses even remotely normalised will agree on what is suffering vs what is good for them. In the end, God is goodness itself, and he is with us, but the choice is up to us to do good things and to have “free” will, or to give in to “entropy” or destruction, and have enslaved will to sin and death. 2:There have been plenty of humans who claimed to be sons of gods or otherwise, who claimed to do great things. There are a few central reasons why Jesus is objectively proven to be the son of God. 1-Jesus is one of the central reasons for the advancement of western civilisation. There is alot of debate about this, however atleast on the topic of science, Catholicism contributed directly to the scientific endeavour in order for people to discover God’s world. Without which we would never have reached the scientific advances we did today, or if we did, it would have taken a lot longer, also, without Jesus, Mohammad would never have had his journey, like how without Abraham there would be no Israel - in the way it was. So the advances of the Muslim world would not have happened either. So the contributions of Jesus Christ, and of the rest of the bible are monumental. The idea of the sovereign individual, comes nearly entirely from Christianity, really, certainly the spread of the idea of the logos / free speech comes from Christianity / because of Jesus. There are so many things in western civilisation which are good - which objectively would never have happened without Jesus Christ. The second point is, If Jesus had not risen from the dead Disciples would have -No incentive to preach -No Reward -Proof of religious fallacy (no resurrection) -Central leader is dead -Studious and literate to form complex passages and arguments -Each becoming their own leader of their journey (having no greed to cause any massive disagreement between the groups until after disciples death) atleast one would have become corrupt with their leadership? (If Jesus had not risen) They also faced: -Mortal peril -Reputation peril -Religious peril for disobeying the old ways -Social peril -Other Hardship peril (travel across nations, building whole churches and otherwise) -All the Languages they had to translate their texts into would have been a serious challenge, -Torture, -Starvation -crucifixion -beheading, -Poisoning -Hunted by Spear -Threat to families There is no other fanatical group in history that underwent all this and remained intact for long, a few rare cases underwent 3 or 4 of these listed conditions, I would challenge you to find a case where a group does go through all that at the same time, because under the first few points alone it is historically proven that no fanatical group will remain intact - ever through all of history. So if Jesus didn’t rise and all these points applied to the apostles - there would be 0 chance of their success, it would have been a logical impossibility based on the primary source evidence we have of every other fanatical group in history. So the only possible way, is for Jesus to have risen from the Dead. 3:This isn’t all that you were talking about here, but The common idea that there is no evidence, empirical, scientific or otherwise - for God, is unfounded. There is no evidence that there is no evidence for God. I have only seen a few serious scientists - maybe it’s cause I’m blind, but I don’t think so - who genuinely try to discover the existence of God using only empirical data, using scientific methods, and instruments to see if they can objectively understand God. I haven’t yet seen a group of atleast 20 or so theoretically credible scientists (Oxford level) with modern equipment and knowledge, sit down and figure out a 10 year plan to try and understand God “the creator” from every possible angle and then release a full book with their complete findings into the scientific community. If the research has not been properly done, then there is no evidence - that there is no evidence for God. The whole claim is completely unfounded, completely biased, there is no official way it could be grounded in truth, because how do they know if they haven’t even tried to properly understand God scientifically? Until a proper investigation of substantial weight worthy of the topic’s calibre is launched, this claim has no scientific grounds on any level of analysis, and it being put forth is a stain on the scientific endeavour, and is a stain on the scientific credibility of any “scientist” who says such a factually un-researched and therefore %100 biased claim. I’ll say a mathematically sound proof of God though, what caused the existence of the universe? 1 or 0? Objectively speaking, universe = 1. What caused 1? Was it 1 that caused 1, or 0 that caused 1. That’s an equation. 0 x 1 or 1 x 1. 0 x 1 = 0, so nothingness could not have created the universe. 1 x 1 = 1. So therefore, the force that created the universe, was the force of creation itself, or existence. There, God, the creator, empirically proven with basic mathematics. God = 1 or existence or the force of creation in that equation. Leaving all bias behind just trying to discover the force of 1 itself, God fits the definition well as the creator. This equation is interchangeable and the same outcome is proven changing out the x symbol with divide subtract, etc. once you see what 1 = and what 0 = 4:The older translations of the bible reveal that God was not a tyrannical person, one example is the verse where apparently god cammands Israelites to kill children, the older translation literally never even says the word children in that verse. It was added later. There are many examples of this. Ultimately the greatest proof though is just the fact that God woudn’t do that, so then somethings off with the translation or it’s misinterpreted or something. Same with the other verses in the bible like this, and there actually aren’t that many at all as there are made out to be, maybe like 5 or 10 of that level which again, are translated completely wrong. 5:Those who killed in god’s name, did so vainly, and they will pay the price because they were truly evil, 6:Many of the points you made here, I agree, this video is slightly misinformed, it is right for people to question this very shallow and degrading view of god, however there is genuine heart here, although they can do a much better job