So china doesn’t want to be spied on ? Ironic.

@willytheriot8439

Жыл бұрын

😂

@americancracker0078

Жыл бұрын

Did you even watch the video ? The THADD system is not for spying. Maybe all them kiddy video games you watch have blocked your common sense. 🤔

@laosasean8482

Жыл бұрын

Same with US that why they bitching about the Chinese balloon.

@worldatpeace8979

Жыл бұрын

I really wonder 🤔

@hajimami4859

Жыл бұрын

What do you expect with the US? US also Didnt wanted to get spied. and yet, THEY created to U2 and the SR71 during the cold war And today THEY uses a Military satelite to spy on other adversaries. Ironi, isn't it?

They need a Coastal High Altitude Area Defense... Or CHAAD

I love THAAD system !

Freedom has no price. Brave men and women who continue to protect us, we salute you👏🏿👏🏿👏🏿👏🏿🙏🏿🙏🏿🙏🏿

@cashcash5995

9 ай бұрын

Freedom , democracy are just poison to master the weak only . America is the biggest dictator but knows how master its population .

@brianbassett4379

2 ай бұрын

The Ethiopian military?

Absolutely incredible engineers

Une présentation remarquable. Bien fait!

@Booz2020

Жыл бұрын

Ah OUI !Vous Avez Raison!

I love this system so much I named my kid THAAD! :p

@tureymilla

9 ай бұрын

😂😂😂

@davidhynes

9 ай бұрын

Good one buddy.

@nasigorengpecelesteh1506

8 ай бұрын

Wkwkwk

The concept of kinetic kill (hit-to-kill) is mind boggling. If THAAD is traveling at Mach 8 (9360 feet/sec), while the target missile travels at 17,000 miles/hour (24,933 feet/sec), the head-on approach speed is 6.5 miles/sec. What are the odds of one basket ball being thrown so as to hit another one when they're approaching one another at 6.5 miles/second ?

@brianbassett4379

2 ай бұрын

They don't come in contact until after a detonation, and basketballs can't alter trajectory in flight, Pumpkin.

Feedback: The sounds of missiles launching was too high to hear what the narrator was saying

Thaad is 1 of many we use in multiple layered defense systems

@cashcash5995

9 ай бұрын

America's system failed to protect Saudi-Arabia against the Houthis .

@brianbassett4379

2 ай бұрын

Was there a point to be had or just verbal diahreea?

@villarreal6

2 ай бұрын

@@brianbassett4379he doesn’t have to explain himself. It’s all there.

Nice 1🙌🙌👍🏻👍🏻

Although it's not designed to intercept ICBMs, is it hypothetically capable of doing so?

@mrbaab5932

9 ай бұрын

Yes, many interceptor missiles are.

@erichammond9308

9 ай бұрын

Yes, THAAD,. Patriot and AEGIS are all capable of intercepting ballistic missiles. Oh, and THAAD has an unclassified top speed of Mach 8.2 it's hypersonic. 😂😂

@user-ym5bl2vl7c

5 ай бұрын

​@@erichammond9308Thaad is better than s-400.

@jjjr.1186

2 ай бұрын

Actually thaad was specifically designed to intercept hypersonic icbm missiles.

Its radar is OP, that's why having it in the Korean peninsula makes the CCP and NK loud of their opposition.

David Attenborough moved on to explain military capabilities NICE!!! Impressive!

Glad we have Thaad!! GO USA 🇺🇸 👍🏾

@ManojAdikari-qd1nj

10 ай бұрын

And too many homeless beggars too😂

@janjanpamposa4153

9 ай бұрын

​@@ManojAdikari-qd1nj😂😂

@gigginbig3

9 ай бұрын

@@ManojAdikari-qd1njthat still eat better then the people in your country 😂

@jrgenfjordbge264

9 ай бұрын

​@@gigginbig3lo lo lo no

@cjm.10

9 ай бұрын

Thaad missile reaching 150km? It's almost reaching space

The sound of the footage is too loud. Makes it hard at times to understand the speaker.

Won't be surprised to hear if some of these are in Taipei

I have one doubt this system intercept hypersonic cruise missile or hyper sonic glide projectiles?

@dianapennepacker6854

Жыл бұрын

I don't think any are capable today so far. At least that we know of. For whatever reason some people say you can only intercept a hypersonic with an other hypersonic. I call bullshit personally. It's just hard though to make a system be able to hit one though due to the velocities and timing involved. Maybe in the future we will have systems that can. Lasers are starting to roll out now but have a while to go yet look promising.. Flak is also making a come back - as in a shell with a fuse that shoots a wall of tungsten. Right now America's CIWIS uses kinetic kill which is like shooting a bullet with a bullet. Flak is good because it's cheap and same for lasers. Germans skynext program seems like it has potential. Seen it shoot down 8 drones in a single burst and can be fired at ground targets. I think its made for artillery and missiles as well. Then missiles of course but missiles are expensive as hell. Whatever your defending better be worth it. If anyone knows why you need a hypersonic missile to defeat an other please tell me why. If the target is coming at you ya just need to hit it - hypersonic missiles move so fast that even a small tungsten ball would wreck it.

@tabernaclejones6115

Жыл бұрын

​@Diana Pennepacker thank you Diana, very well thought out babe.

@kiro9257

Жыл бұрын

THAAD was designed to intercept ICBMs which has a speed of Mach 21+ THAAD can definitely intercept new conventional hypersonic weapons, but not without difficulty, as new conventional hypersonic weapons can glide and change courses through small changes.

@renetanchico6901

Жыл бұрын

If Patriot PAC 3 can intercept Russia's Hypersonic Kinzhal missile, I have no doubt THAAD could also without a problem..

@clydelouis5956

10 ай бұрын

@@renetanchico6901 I heard Patriot thing was bs. Ukrainian engineers admitted it was untrue then later they were coerced into saying it was true. I need to see the Kinzhal because the one person that tried to show it was the Kinzhal was proven it wasn't. How do you get on social media touting something is from a Kinzhal and later get proven it wasn't? That's embarassing

Well done guys 👍

The best - by far

Can these intercept Russian and Chinese hypersonic rockets?

@gianmarcoconte2439

Жыл бұрын

Nope

@Jncta

Жыл бұрын

yes the new extended thaad can meet any hypersonic ballistic in halfway of the globe…

@gianmarcoconte2439

Жыл бұрын

@@Jncta It doesn' t exist

@gups4963

10 ай бұрын

Patriot handled kinzhal easily and will almost certainly do the same with china's, mostly because those "hypersonic missiles" aren't hypersonic missiles. They are garden variety ballistic missiles. The ones with HGV they can but will likely need to fire more than one missile at it. Should be interesting to see how the MUTANT missile the U.S. is working on plays into this

@clydelouis5956

10 ай бұрын

@@gups4963 I heard Patriot thing was bs. Ukrainian engineers admitted it was untrue then later they were coerced into saying it was true. I need to see the Kinzhal because the one person that tried to show it was the Kinzhal was proven it wasn't. How do you get on social media touting something is from a Kinzhal and later get proven it wasn't? That's embarassing

Pretty respectful interceptor system! High altitude and all!!! Roa Aotearoa nui.

Great

Japan must buy some THAADs

@gregparrott

9 ай бұрын

Japan has two missile defense systems - a homegrown one, and the Aegis-Offshore system. I think they're both shorter range systems.

@cashcash5995

9 ай бұрын

No worry , America will force Japan to buy it just like the F35 .

@brianbassett4379

2 ай бұрын

@@cashcash5995 hahaha You have a real mind there, Pumpkin.

@villarreal6

2 ай бұрын

@@cashcash5995well you right since we are there protection

i love how uncle sam keeps opponents busy with aerial superiority

South Korea should buy thaad so China can't complain 😂

@mauriciofonseca2079

9 ай бұрын

The US doesn´t sell the THAAD system.

@cashcash5995

9 ай бұрын

@@mauriciofonseca2079 So shitty that NATO member like Turkey bought S-400 .

Sind die in Europa stationiert?

If China doesn’t have a similar system eventually they will make one

@rickjames18

Жыл бұрын

You mean after they manage to steal the technology? if so, yes, that is the problem the CCP has many spies all over the west stealing anything they can. Sometimes we even have western companies literally sharing tech for market access but commercial. Really big problem in the west and that is how China managed to close the tech gap.

@deebil8099

10 ай бұрын

Yea, but a shitty copy😁😆😂They won't hit shit. Half of them will probably explode on launch😂

@cashcash5995

9 ай бұрын

@@deebil8099 Your racist behavior is your weakness , the shitty copy is in your house now .

@RyanC143

8 ай бұрын

You can’t really trust China system a lot of them is broken

We also want it to be upgraded to reach of fifteen times the speed of sound and be able to intercept manoeuvrable hypersonic missiles.

@ManojAdikari-qd1nj

10 ай бұрын

And also live homeless in streets of USA😂

@gups4963

10 ай бұрын

@@ManojAdikari-qd1nj China has its own issues with that and getting much worse everyday. Xi still hiding from the chinese people

@mrbaab5932

9 ай бұрын

Why? It can already intercept Hypersonic missiles like Patriot has done in Ukraine. Hypersonic missiles only go Mach 5 and this missile is Mach 7. Also Hypersonic missiles only maneuver in the beginning on their flight. Other missiles maneuver too. Patriot, Thaads and other systems can intercept maneuvering threats.

@spicesmuggler2452

9 ай бұрын

​@@mrbaab5932hypersonic missiles go up of mach 5, zircon goes mach 8 and kinzhal up to mach 10 but only for a short amount of travel time

@chillwill5080

9 ай бұрын

@@ManojAdikari-qd1nj Why don't you know that there are homeless in China?

Can thaad defense system intercept hypersonic missiles?

@WorshipinIdols

10 ай бұрын

All ballistic missiles are technically hypersonic by definition.

@MrDJAK777

9 ай бұрын

​@@WorshipinIdolsthat's just not true ballistic just means it follows a ballistic trajectory that doesn't guarantee any specific speed even if it's falling from high altitude. Yes most do/will reach hypersonic speeds but it's not inherently true of all ballistic missiles for example atacms (tactical ballistic middle) which reaches only mach 3-4.

@WorshipinIdols

9 ай бұрын

@@MrDJAK777 there is a direct causal relationship between a ballistic missiles range, and its velocity. It is true that the shortest range missiles such as ATACMs will have the lowest speed. I don’t know if your exact claim is true but what ever. That is a very short-range tactical missile. Otherwise known as a quasi-ballistic missile. Anything else that reaches at least 500km+ will have to break Mach 5 to get there.

I have a new design called nine tails it starts is one single projectile And splits off iimto 9 interceptors

@irwan3064

Жыл бұрын

I invent one of which the body is made of plastic to repel radar signature

During a nuclear exchange between the east and the west china and/or russia is like to fire 300 nukes at once - can they all be intercepted ?

Fatal error: you said Thad Was used against short, medium and intermediate range missiles but NOT ICBM… It is exactly the opposite: it’s for ICBMs ONLY!

@MrDJAK777

9 ай бұрын

Nah check that again mate.

@cashcash5995

9 ай бұрын

DF-17 will demonstrate that the thing doesn't work .

all these cutting edge surface-to-air missile system mean nothing if you don't have adequate inventory of missiles & ammo . . .

Pls i will like to know if Thad can defend against Chinese DF17 hypersonic missiles

@EarthStories356

Жыл бұрын

www.youtube.com/@AmazingCooking303 OMG 😱😱

@gianmarcoconte2439

Жыл бұрын

Nope

@rosevitelli5814

Жыл бұрын

No it will not hypersonics not that it's to fast but it manuverable no one not even China yet can stop there own but everyone must understand this the USA messed up we could of has hypersonics decades ago but because the USA abides by rules we cancelled and stopped the programming a they were all defined by DOD and Russia and China took the diagrams from the Internet and started where the USA left off they have been working on this over two decades the USA is behind but I will tell you this as fact we will actually have better ones and in short time from all the prior decades of testing but we should have never stopped and built them but the USA will have them by 2025 operational so everyone don't think we can't build them there is a reason why were behind but the giant has been awaken

@kiro9257

Жыл бұрын

DF-17 is an Anti-Ship missile, so I doubt that China would even use it against an Anti-Ballistic missile system.

@xinjinpiig4062

10 ай бұрын

Chinese fireworks?

In layman’s terms, how does it project intercept point or actually hit the missile

@mainbmain

Жыл бұрын

join the army, and you can learn. All that information bet its classified

@mattwilson3244

Жыл бұрын

Computer prediction programs : but THAAD ,only about 50% success in Testing ,and Not enough testing ,But Hey ,why worry about Reality ? Were making Money Here !

@bungalowjuice7225

Жыл бұрын

@@mattwilson3244 How good is Patriot compared to THAAD? Let's say against a ballistic missile.

@renetanchico6901

Жыл бұрын

@@mattwilson3244What are you talking about? THAAD had a 100% success rate in testing.

@Ef554rgcc

11 ай бұрын

Hit to kill

0:40 Poland 🇵🇱 on radar😎

@EarthStories356

Жыл бұрын

OMG 😱😱

Why not ICBS ??

@hawky2k215

10 ай бұрын

Do you mean ICBM ?? If so they're belonged to Russia

every dictators are afraid of their own ghosts..

Upgrade that baby with machine learning algorithms and it will work like black magic .

Clarification, pls - is THADD intended to be employed by South Korea to stymy North Korea while NATO/Japan takes on mainland China to extricate Taiwan; otherwise, at the outset a devastating preemptive strike on NKPR is absolutely necessary! Will Guam use a combination of missiles and fighters, but does THADD fit?

This is simply Hawk 4.0 👌 the newest and improved version.

@fabiandiaz1264

Жыл бұрын

Nothing like Hawk. Not comparable.

@mainbmain

Жыл бұрын

lmao bro hawk and thaad are two completely different systems build for completely seperate purposes. Hawk cant engage TBM

@michaelshultz2540

Жыл бұрын

@@fabiandiaz1264 i did say new and improved.

@michaelshultz2540

Жыл бұрын

@B Main New and Improved. If current technology was available when hawk was first developed, you think it would be similar ? U should consider, I did say ,New & Improved. 😎

@gilbertozuniga8063

9 ай бұрын

@@michaelshultz2540no way it is Hawk!

nice is the word

I never paid attention on my trigonometry classes, but I can still tell a dud when I see one...

US citizens must be proud

Put THAAD in one of the island in Batanes and one in Palawan. That would be good placement.

Can not shoot down ICBM?

@mattwilson3244

Жыл бұрын

Nobody ,can Shoot down ICBM ,Yet ,!

Once a missile launching produces much smoke and sound, it is obvious to be a low techology

@daikucoffee5316

Жыл бұрын

Lol, why?

@MekeniGaming

Жыл бұрын

According to "💩" 😂

There isn't enough THAAD launchers in that region to stop North Korea, let alone China. Saturation attacks can easily overwhelm those systems.

@fumbahphiri9462

Жыл бұрын

During war time they can be many

@dianapennepacker6854

Жыл бұрын

That's the issue. The whole point of them is to defend key locations. Lasers are finally going to be deployed which hopefully stop low cost saturation attacks and make missile defense much easier for fraction of the cost. Leave the missiles to other high end weapons. Still wondering why we can't design great flak cannons. Surely a modern automated uhh let's say 90mm can take out a missile? The speed of the incoming missle and outgoing shell + explosive tungsten fragments should disintegrate whatever it touches. All in a relatively low cost solution, because AA defense is stupid expensive.

@abba3629

Жыл бұрын

Ever Heard of "RETALIATORY STRIKES." or "COUNTER STRIKES."

@johnsilver9338

Жыл бұрын

It's not the interceptor/launcher that China is worried of, but the radar. This radar can not only see North Korean airspace but all the way up to China even Beijing. It is even more powerful than China's own LPAR which is massive radar installed on a building. And with powerful radars 5th gen stealth can be detected and also tracked at long range especially by THAAD's X-band TPY-2 radar. With the IBCS network, different interceptors/launchers can use THAAD's radar like South Korea's KM-SAM and upper tier L-SAM. It's small and compact too so it's easy enough to transport. Israel also uses TPY-2 radar for their Arrow series of BMD interceptors.

@dianapennepacker6854

Жыл бұрын

@@johnsilver9338 Aye the radars are what separate a good system against a poor one. You can have the best missiles and air defense don't mean a thing if you can't get a weapon grade lock. I am not too caught up though in the newest and latest radars though as it is all gibberish to me. I just keep hearing about all these new radars coming into play recently, and it seems like the US is putting a lot of focus on upgrading them across all sorts of platforms. From the Viper to the F 35, to the Aegis and AWAC. Crazy how expensive they are.

The US Military should send all its THAAD missle systems to all US military bases in the Pacific don't let China,North Korea and Russia Scare you

Time to dust off those Sprint missile blueprints to deal w/ the ICBMs?

Sir - you did not talk about Philippines P Missiles

Why does the narrator keep presenting know public facts as hypothetical propositions?

I hope China stop thinking about invaded Taiwan ! Economy should focus! isn't war

How many can it block at once 😂

Why are those idiots saying that thaad is a threat to China or Russia.

@hazelotida4545

10 ай бұрын

Because of the radar when US put thaad in south half of china can track thaad radar

@haochengzhai7156

10 ай бұрын

Because it was 6 years ago

@aubreyjohncatador5381

10 ай бұрын

Your the idiot the threat is not missile itself it's the radar which could gather radar data and monitor half of Chinese airspace.........you don't know how valuable this information for war planning as it could have valuable data of Chinese aviation military and civilian in it's coverage area.........

i thought thaad was a relic of the 90s along with patriot...

In the grand calculus of the universe, my life is worth less than the millions still living.I love you. I love you in every universe. It's not that I don't want to care or want someone to care for me. I'm just...

What do you mean “could”? It does! That’s what it was made for.

Thaad was awesome!

Still need something to beat ICBM. going back to star wars / SDI anyone ?

Outdated knowledge, try intercept DF hypersonic missiles

Place them along the coast

THAAD is an ancient weapon. Beware of electronic warfare!

Just say it’s in Taewon

US Sand that thing to Ukraine and you would see what would hipping to the THAAD.

Glad we have it.. keep making more keep upgrading them we need all the firepower so United States could keep the peace around the world..❤🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸💪💪💪🦾🦾🦾🚀🚀🚀🚀

That is nothing to drone

Bring some THAAD to Japan to counter N. Korean missiles.

I am tired of Deckon identifying corruption and not doing anything about it. Kieth Mitchell is very disgusting. Can't imagine corrupt Africans allowed to setup shop in Grenada.

Mainly because it’s radar can see from Japan to Moscow😂

PH should buy Thaad Missiles

@aubreyjohncatador5381

10 ай бұрын

Got money of 100 billion pesos not 🚫 including interceptor missiles??

Why is China against it? Because they don’t have anything similar.

Eiii 😂😂😂😂 you guys can lie oooh how can thaad be the best air defense system 😂😂😂😂😂

..3:27...

Nonetheless these assets of missile defense will prove to be valuable because it’ll be a mix of swarm of dronesand ballistic and cruise Mrs. pray to God but row to shore

GOD BLESS THE U S A!

If target missile change its direction when approaching near by THAAD counter missile.what will happen..China has Snake missile...continues change its direction unpredictable

@rchot84

Жыл бұрын

A missle can only slightly change direction when it's in a thin enough atmosphere to do so without destroying itself. When it has to strike a target, it must stay on trajectory in the thick atmosphere.

Send this to ISREAL ASAP

One more American paper tiger. Same as the Patriot system, in the stats greatest, on the battlefield can't shoot down nothing more than a cruise missile.

The US doesn't have the ability to keep track or a lock at the moment on manuverable hypersonic weapons until the terminal phase at the moment. That is why the US started a new satellite program (Satellite profileration program) which already started building/launching hundreds of satellites with the capability to track/lock those targets after detecting the launch. The US is putting a lot of money into upgrading and adding new systems capable of tracking all kinds of targets from enemy countries. Another reason they are sending so many satellites is to make sure China/Iran/Russia can't just take out one, two, three, etc satellites and cripple the US. There will be so many all networked that China will not be to damage US capabilities.

@MekeniGaming

Жыл бұрын

Patriot already shot down the "Invincible " Khinzal Hypersonic missile 😂😂 multiple times!

@rickjames18

10 ай бұрын

@@MekeniGaming Yes, that is true but what I am talking about is the US having the ability to track in more easily. A new programs sending hundreds of satellites tha will help keep track of hypersonics being launched all over the world. The ability to maintain and keep a weapons grade lock.

@RyanC143

8 ай бұрын

@@rickjames18you don’t know that , the network system can be all bullshit

why ALL these money is spent for killing people and not for improvement and better living? can anyone give me a logical answer ???

@RyanC143

8 ай бұрын

Cause the US is a military country

I'll trade you for 50 freedom bucks. Final offer!

Us spread om

Thaad c'est fort

better than Himars

sell a THAAD system to Taipei than watch Beijing lose its mind

shouldn't all these weapon R&D should spend on building better infrastructures like high-speed rail, subway, 5G, Affordable health care...? who dare to attack USA? Mexico? Canada?

Nonsense! So much nonsense, given the speed and altitude, they know that it is almost impossible to intercept, just bla bla bla....

JAPAN, SOUTH KOREA, TAIWAN, PHILIPPINES, SHOULD HAVE THEM ALL OVER...

Lp

Patriot cost 4 million dollar per missile, THAAD 800 million per battery, how it will cost for example to shot down 800 dollar HAMAS rockets?? Not practical at all.

@AmirShafeek

8 ай бұрын

Neither Patriot nor Thad can target hamas rockets. That's what we use the iron dome for. Or ESS n. Although this isn't a land-based system or weapon?

I LOVE YOU USA

Why they are not in Ukraine?!)

@dynjarren5454

Жыл бұрын

How much do we really have to give? This is bidens war

@tyrone2937

Жыл бұрын

@@dynjarren5454 Nah. I'm fine with the government giving them "AID", it's more of an investment, plus, this current situation is the US military's wet dream. Giving off

@antonkornishuk3446

Жыл бұрын

@@dynjarren5454 You have to give all that we need! Cause my Nation pay the highest price - Blood of Our Heroes!

Give 100 these to ukraine

Far inferior to S-300 , S-400 and S500 that is why Turkey , a member of NATO bought S-400 .

@bryanhoppe1481

8 ай бұрын

That's not why. Turkey bought from Russia because it's cheaper. You get what you pay for. Ankara has said it had no choice but to buy the Russian missiles, because NATO countries did not offer a cost-effective alternative to satisfy an urgent need. In addition, NATO air defense manufacturers could not deliver their systems for several years due to the backlog of other contracts. Turkey is currently developing their own domestic AMD systems, but that is also years away. So, it was either Russian garbage or nothing.

Looks useless to me. Anything as fast as that missile or faster can't be stopped

@grimreaper318

Жыл бұрын

That’s not how defense system works they’re not racing from point A to point B. Picture it like this, you’re going west and I’m going east it really doesn’t matter if you’re top speed is higher than mine. We’re going to cross path tho because we’re going into the opposite direction which means we’re going to collide in one another that’s how the Thaad system work.

@ele4984

Жыл бұрын

@@grimreaper318 what if the incoming missile could be made to change direction rapidly. Although I understand some interceptor missile could be made to disburse scattered metal balls when close enough to target but even that is not enough. Perhaps the intercepting missile has to also have an EMP detonation.

@johnsilver9338

Жыл бұрын

It's not the interceptor/launcher that China is worried of, but the radar. This radar can not only see North Korean airspace but all the way up to China even Beijing. It is even more powerful than China's own LPAR which is massive radar installed on a building. And with powerful radars 5th gen stealth can be detected and also tracked at long range especially by THAAD's X-band TPY-2 radar. With the IBCS network, different interceptors/launchers can use THAAD's radar like South Korea's KM-SAM and upper tier L-SAM. It's small and compact too so it's easy enough to transport. Israel also uses TPY-2 radar for their Arrow series of BMD interceptors. Lastly, THAAD's interceptors already reach hypersonic speeds of Mach 7.2 long before hypersonic missiles were developed and came into existence. So it's not about speed anymore, but about if hypersonic missiles can be detected early on and tracked. So the moment China launches it ballistic/hypersonic missiles, THAAD's radar can see it.

@ele4984

Жыл бұрын

@@johnsilver9338 oh now I understand. Ultimately the goal is to spy on China

@johnsilver9338

Жыл бұрын

@@ele4984 Yup. But it's more likely the North that South Korea will keep tabs on. But if they have another they could too.

Nay... Can't intercept hypersonic missiles lol

@tyrone2937

Жыл бұрын

Ballistic missiles are hypersonics

@johnsilver9338

Жыл бұрын

THAAD's interceptors already reach hypersonic speeds of Mach 7.2 long before hypersonic weapons were developed and came into existence.

@johnsilver9338

Жыл бұрын

@@John-.-Smith Depends of what part of the flight path it will intercept. At terminal stage ofcourse it won't. But at midcourse it can. As it can climb to 150km altitudes, it can intercept ballistic/hypersonic missiles with apogees at that height before the warhead seperates or reenters atmosphere and start to manuever and/or gain speed. S-500 also can do that as it can climb to 200km. This is assuming a hypersonic missile is detected and tracked early on after its launch as it also uses a ballistic missile as a carrier. So their is no difference between intercepting a hypersonic missile or ballistic one at midcourse.

@chastings3550

Жыл бұрын

@@John-.-Smith they would never tell you what they really have, civilians find out 20 years later

It cant replicate it 😂😂?? Its not like its a refurbished Soviet / australian carrier they call their own 😂😂 They tell the whole world they have there own Tech then why did they buy 5 soviet wrecks and an Australian carrier in 1985 ... its only taken them 38 years to refurbish it and call it their own people realisticly think they can compare with the u.s the u.s mothball fleet would wipe it

J-20 stealth fighter can take its out easily. China don't scare the missile but its radar.

@niweshlekhak9646

10 ай бұрын

Alright your comment makes no sense, if China is scared of the radar then definitely it can target J-20.