I've got a 2017 2.5 Limited and I got it because it has the best AWD system out there, it's easy to work on and it is practical for carrying things that don't require a van. Sorry if I'm frumpy. If. Wanted a sports car, I would have bought one. I have to be able to get through snow.

Subaru is a great car. The best in his class.

You failed to mention its high resale value and excellent reliability.

@jasonkresock2196

3 жыл бұрын

But he didn't forget to try and sell us a T-Shirt.

Nothing wrong with its style. ....it's very nice.

@bosse641

7 жыл бұрын

***** yes, and I said "very nice". ...that is more than "nice".

@monkfarm

7 жыл бұрын

Well, I love the car, '17 XT touring; but it does have the "me, too" styling.

@hewlettpackard4301

7 жыл бұрын

Tell that who bought the Hummer

@thatperson2508

7 жыл бұрын

how about thousands of subaru owners around the globe with severe oil consumption problem(most of 2011-2015 and even 2015 2016, and get this 2017). Now, after class action law suit still having the same problems. i mean 2017 models burning a quart of oil per 500-1000 miles. We had 6 subarus in our family, but after 2011 the cars became garbage. Sad AF.

I have the 2017 Touring and we love this thing. We got it in black and had the windows (Drivers and Passengers) tinted to match the back windows The forester is great looking inside and out. And You get a lot more with this car for the money than other vehicles in its class

Just bought a 2015 FORESTER XT Limited with only 20,000 km! Absolutely love it 😍! Great styling, roomy interior, awesome stereo, and all that with the Subaru's infamous Symmetrical All-Wheel Drive. And that "Turbo" Rumble is simply to-die-for! 2 👍👍 from this satisfied Subaru owner.

Other than the fact that the back seats DO recline (other than the base model), this review is pretty fair. The problem is that he did not really go over what subarus do better than any other maker of vehicles: symmetrical, full-time AWD... HUGE plus. It’s also worth at least briefly noting the high re-sale value. I have a 17 forester premium, and LOVE the way it drives. It has the practicality of a larger vehicle in most ways, but it drives like a sedan. I’d recommend a forester to just about anyone

Not a well researched review. For starters, you can recline the back seats several inches. Also, he probably wasn't aware of the "S- Drive" modes since he didn't mention it. This Subie goes from 0-60 in 6.4 seconds and the XT has Active Torque Vector ing plus a sportier suspension. I have a 2014 XT Touring and can tell you it's very fast and very fun to drive. Lastly, to gloss over Subaru's full time awd is absurd. I have had 4 wheel drive vehicles for 20 years before getting the Forester (my first) and it puts all those to shame other than really hard off trail roads. It sounds like from the beginning, he is not a fan of Subaru, which is fine. Simply do a more objective review.

@Wiggy74

7 жыл бұрын

tommymas1 I was thinking the same about how he TOTALLY dismissed the Forester's AWD prowess versus the competition....that's blasphemous!!!!!

@colingpp8288

7 жыл бұрын

tommymas1 qa

@monkfarm

7 жыл бұрын

Indeed, tommymas, I love my Forester XT '17. The suspension is somewhat quircky, but I am used to it. My XT flies when I dip into the throttle especially with one of the two buttons you mentioned engaged.

@TheBigbangguy

7 жыл бұрын

I own a 2014 XT and it is great! It really flies when you need all The power of it's 4cyl turbo! And not to Mention The great AWD system, One of the best in The hole industry. I agree it is not The best un entertainment system, but who cares of you have one of the best cars in The category!

@kartboarder22g17

7 жыл бұрын

He seemed like a common SUV driver that sees AWD on the back and thinks its got AWD they are all the same. Can't blame him I guess I was one of those guys back in the day when I was purchasing my first car, never again!

I picked one of these up back in August. I love it so much. Once it starts snowing a lot here (Colorado) I will post a video showing how well it handles the deep snow

Drive it in S# mode. It is very fun to drive in this mode. Huge difference over the other modes.

I think it looks awesome!

My friend, You need to get out of 2007. In 2016 for the money, there is no other crossover better than this.

@jasonkresock2196

3 жыл бұрын

Amen! It's not a poser street designed SUV as he's comparing it to. It's more for off road and in the snow. Worst review for its abilities I've ever seen.

Actually, the back seats do recline. :)

@rockymountainstemcell651

7 жыл бұрын

I was about to write the same thing! If they cant get this one small (but important detail) correct I think they are going to miss the big features (like the best all wheel drive system in the market BY FAR). I was right. What makes a Subaru a Subaru......Boxer engine, symmetrical all wheel drive!!!

@jonszabo

7 жыл бұрын

I agree!! I also wish then when he would give us his "opinion", i.e. the way it looks, etc...that he presented it as his opinion, then to say it in a way as if it were a fact. I've been doing LOTS of research for an AWD vehicle....and I've finally narrowed it down to the Forester XT, and the Outback 3.6R Limited. I guess it'll just come down to how they "feel" when I drive them...and which ones works better for me. But, lord willing and the creek don't rise...lol...I hope to be a part of the "Subie" family in the not too distant future. :)

@colingpp8288

7 жыл бұрын

Jonathon Szabo i pi8

I have a 2017..2.5. My only cons: 1) I want a temperature gauge, not a idiot light that is blue when you start in the morning and, I'm assuming, will light red when you boil over. 2) Speaking of gauges, I want a analog (needle) gas gauge, not little dots that disappear. I have calculated each "dot" is about 50 miles. When you get down to 1-3 "dots" it's like watching the detonator of a time bomb! 3) Like every motorized tailgate I've ever seen, it's very slow and really only valuable when you're walking to the car and push the button 50 feet before you get there. 4) Let me manually open the tailgate EVEN WHEN IT'S NOT IN PARK! Finally, for some weird reason, it feels like it rides "on top" of the road instead of gripping it. This can get scary when your on a long curve and are moving at a good clip and hit some rough road or pot holes. It feels like you're bouncing on top and are not even making contact with the road(!). Other than all that I like the car!

FYI '17 Forester XT Touring rear seats do recline - you use small pull straps on seat bottoms to activate recline mechanism.

How I really love subaru forester

Make one video comparing with other similar SUVs like the Honda CR-V, Mazda CX-5, Toyota RAV4 and whatever similar SUVs you think it fits in the segment. Cheers!

Has the presenter even taken the Forester onto any twisty mountain roads, or was the opinion on city roads only? Put it in S mode and it's pretty darn fun with all that power. Of course there are a lot of body roll because how tall it is, it still has to obey the laws of physics.

@monkfarm

7 жыл бұрын

I think the handling is quirky, but competent. It took me a while to get used to it, but you can toss this thing into a corner with abandon.

Great review.

Just saw the new 2017 Impreza interior, Forester needs to get that interior, then it will be all good.

@rockymountainstemcell651

7 жыл бұрын

You are correct and it will come in all models over the next few years, which I think Subaru got in right in the Impreza, but missed the mark and waited too long on the other models.

Excellent video -- I like the question and answer format. The forester is a great car, it just may not be for everyone.

you said that the back seats of the Subaru Forester doesn't recline yes it does there's a little black little rope you pull on and it does require just saying

Forester was picked best in its class for winter conditions by consumer reports so for those living in northern climates it's the ideal vehicle.

I love my '17 forester XT! Did you find the 2 buttons on the right hand of the steering wheel that gives it mucho power and makes it really fun to drive. The handling is great, although quirky and the brakes are phenomenal. You never mentioned the x mode which is great for getting through unplowed roads and glossy icy roads. We are experiencing freezing rain here in the midwest, and blizzards which dump a lot of snow at times. With the ice tires (michelin ice X) I have, and the great all wheel drive. This is the car to have going through bad weather. Premimum fuel is not required, but recommended as it will give you about 30 more hp. I have been running 89 octane which works well, and starts good. Not that much power, huh? What are you driving? I rented a Nissan Rogue and that had about half the power that my XT has.

Top of the market resale value,and top notch all wheel drive system plus at this price point what other crossover has better bhp?

@IbeArcher

7 жыл бұрын

Bruce Goodwater I believe there are others with a little more power, but they can't match the symmetrical awd.

@brucegoodwater7813

7 жыл бұрын

XT has 250 bhp,yes awd is great!

@ConstantineJoseph

7 жыл бұрын

It has the legendary wrx fa20 twin scroll turbo. Not fast but it's a vibrant car that will put many other segment to segment competitors to shame

I actually like how the Forester looks very much. It is certainly not the prettiest (CX5 may be) but I doubt they wanted it to be and neither would their buyers. As far as fun to drive I wonder if that comment was in comparison to other SUVs like Rav4, CRV or CX5 or cars? I have had limited time in a Turbo but did not sense that it would not be fun to drive and I am pretty sure it will outclass most SUVs in class except CX5 for driving dynamics. Then there is no mention about off road ability which is certainly a compelling reason for Forester buyers and an area where it simply eclipses pretty much everything in and many out of its class. No manual is unfortunate but these new Subaru CVTs have been very compelling to the open minded yet many journalists make negative comments about it (and the looks) to the point where it is like fake news now. Very few have actually given the CVT a fair chance and found it actually quite good and have gotten over the simple fact that it just feels different while actually delivering better results. Someone already got the reclining seats thing but that really exposes a lack of knowledge by the reviewer. Maybe he is just an actor following a script and really knows absolutely nothing about this car or cars in general.

Just bought my 2018 Forester 2.5. Wanted a manual transmission and with lots of added extras for under $24K USD. 30 mpg and living in New England. Its a great car the week and my E93 M3 for the weekend...

Just got an xt touring and we love it

@lestergreen1190

3 жыл бұрын

Any problems?

They should put the WRX STI engine in the forester with 300hp, so this man will be satisfied

@bcomes1550

7 жыл бұрын

Sally Dela cruz go to Japan they have forester STI

@biplav32

7 жыл бұрын

Its not just about engine.

I think forester has a lot of trunk space among this segment, I just want to know which competitor(s) are larger?

Oh come on. This car is the best in his class dude. Try to research more. 😡😡😡

@jasonkresock2196

3 жыл бұрын

100 percent

I have a 15’ XT and loved it, you have so many upgrade/mod options. The one major thing I dislike and have to complain about is the brakes. It is terrible. It feels way too soft and you almost have to floor it to stop in a short distance.

This car has to be good for what you pay for,,,, I’m very happy to buy my 2016 XT model and I love the feel and power,

3rd row Tribeca replacement is due out mid 2017 and will have all the new in car technology and Subaru's famous symmetrical all wheel drive/ Boxer engine

Well reviewed... please review mazda cx 5 thank u.

As a 14 XT owner, I'll spoil this for you - if you didn't like the 14, 15, or 16 Foresters, there's no reason you'll like the 17. Funny it was 2014 SUV of the year though - obviously there's a reason for that.

@rockymountainstemcell651

7 жыл бұрын

Big reasons to buy a 2017..... improved ride and reduced road noise in the cabin. Leaps and bounds over the 2016 and sorry to spoil it for you my friend but absolutely destroys the 2014 (but all Subaru Foresters are wonderful). Enjoy!!!!

@tayl0rd553

7 жыл бұрын

The '17 Forester XT is quite a bit different from the '14-'16. Most casual lookers won't notice much visual difference between them, but the refinement and features of the '17 blow the '14-'16 out of the water. I couldn't bring myself to trade our '06 XT w/ manual for a '14-'16 XT. The '17 XT Touring was able to convince me.

@Revo2Evo

7 жыл бұрын

XT Touring is too much for the money. You would've been better off with an XT Premium.

@thatperson2508

7 жыл бұрын

how about thousands of subaru owners around the globe with severe oil consumption problem(most of 2011-2015 and even 2015 2016, and get this 2017). Now, after class action law suit still having the same problems. i mean 2017 models burning a quart of oil per 500-1000 miles. We had 6 subarus in our family, but after 2011 the cars became garbage. Sad AF.

did they take away the reclining feature from the back seats?? my 2015 forester has them

12V is available behind the back seat. Back seats recline in all but base models.

How would you rate the Subaru vs. 2017 Honda CRV?

if they will return the hood scoop for XT.

I love this car

how long are head gaskets expected to remain coolant tight?

I've always loved the dorky looks of Subarus, from the "Bug Eyes" of the old Impreza to the boxy looks and big rear windows of the Forester. Stay Weird Subaru.

Misleading review. You said the back seats don't recline which they do except for the base model which doesn't. Get your facts straight before posting misleading videos. No other crossover comes close to the Forester in terms of reliability,comfort and traction in snow. Also the XT trims recommend premium gas but can take lower octane at the cost of HP.

I think the rear seats do recline.

@IbeArcher

7 жыл бұрын

davielove11 yeah they do, just have to pull the release handle at the top of the seat back.

@tommymas1

7 жыл бұрын

yes, they do.

@wandr3r180

7 жыл бұрын

Yes!

@tayl0rd553

7 жыл бұрын

No. That's to fold the seats down. There are nylon handles at the base of the rear seat backs that you pull to recline the seats. And they recline quite a bit.

@benjaminfajardo9469

7 жыл бұрын

davielove11 my 2015 Forester XT rear seats recline and I just found out 4 months ago... lol

I love it. I think it's a lot fun and looks fine, but everybody is different. I appreciate the honesty of this particular point of view. It is exactly what it is... an average family crossover...doesn't seem like it's trying to be anything else. People tend to pick the car that's best for them. It's a lot of fun to drive with great handling and a little extra umhp. It's also comfortable, quiet and roomy. I think it all depends if you drive one everyday or if you review different cars every other day. Owner testimonials may differ from car reviewers. I'm an owner.

The Subaru Forester fourth generation was first seen in 2012 or 2013 for 2014 model with a facelift in 2016 for 2017.

Useful info in review. However, rear seats do recline, Premium fuel is __recommended__ (not required). FYI in 2008 Subaru discontinued XT's with manuals for the USA because not enough of them sold to justify the certification costs (manual XT's are still sold in Australia and Japan).

I purchased a 2017 Touring six months ago in USA and I’m overall satisfied. My concerns are a slow infotainment system which could be better, the USB ports are difficult to access, can I really trust the CVT (never had one) ,a 2014 owner had to have an engine replaced because it was burning too much oil. Lack of power when driving at higher speeds as in the highway. The ride is nice and smooth and I would say luxurious butI have nothing to compare it to. The interior is very comfortable and after 4000k miles and six months I am still exited to drive the Forester and love the conservative looks of the vehicle. I purchased this SUV because of Subaru’s reputation for reliability and AWD system which I really like. Everyone I have talked to so far loves their Subaru and I have not heard a bad comment yet from an owner. I have all the bells and whistles on this Touring model which is black with brown leather seats and do not regret my purchase so far. I do not agree with most points on this video. I realize this is not a sports car but it is FUN to drive. Thanks.....

Oh yea, and the AWD and traction control system kicks butt compared to its competition.

The back seats do recline. It’s a strap that you pull at hip level.

Ive always owned Toyotas I never owned a Subaru but know that they are very reliable and well made cars I would definitely buy this one.

Do you recommend a extended warranty?

The XT model is not fun to drive. I own a 2014 Forester XT and find it plenty fun to drive compared to other small SUV vehicles. Remember you have to compare it to other vehicles in its segment not sports cars.

@sallydelacruz884

7 жыл бұрын

Jeff Riendeau hi there, i am planning to buy a 2017 XT due to its high power... it has a difrence of 100 hp to cmpared to its base model, so i am expecting a big dfrence with XT's power, particulary its acceleration... is it really that quick to accelerate?

@jeffr.3464

7 жыл бұрын

Sally Dela cruz, Hi Sally. Yes, it is very quick especially when in one of the more aggressive driving modes. I always stay in "I" mode and find it quick enough for my needs. They say it can do 0 to 60 in 6.4 seconds and I believe it based on my experience. You should test drive one and when going 30 or so just look at the RPM gauge and try bringing it up to 3000 RPMs. You'll see how quick it is even at that RPM level.

@sallydelacruz884

7 жыл бұрын

Thanks for that informativ response Jeff... Shud i or Shud i not buy this model, im afraid if i buy now, subaru wud release an all new Forester XT model. It wud definitly crushed my heart, im confuse, i can still wait 2 more years maybe... thanx for the reply Jeff...

@jeffr.3464

7 жыл бұрын

I'd wait a year or two then for the next redesign as I think it's due soon. Of course if you like the 2017 design and features and can get a great deal maybe it would be worth it. Good luck.

@sallydelacruz884

7 жыл бұрын

Thanx mate ;)

My top three qualities when buying a $30,000 car are: reliability, reliability, and reliability. Anything else is secondary.

I'd like to address the visibility issue, or what I'll call visibility creep. My '03 forester has excellent visibility (not quite as good as my old '78 Volvo wagon, which was like an aquarium). The new models with sloped and widened side panels reduce visibility quite noticeably.

You said pick top 3 quality when looking for crossover you pick Spaciousness, Safety and Fuel Efficiency then you said "But it doesn't matched up to other features of its competitors" This is because you live in an area where AWD is not your priority. For some is #1 AWD then #2 is safety #3 Resale. And if you happened to live in Alaska, Yukon, Nunavut or any of northern america territory then your second vehicle is Subaru period. But for those buyers that doesn't prioritize AWD, then FWD or RWD is more promising because fuel economy or/and spaciousness is the compromise of weight saving. If you remember the time Crossover started then you should know that Crossover vehicle is design for go anywhere but not to extreme. It prioritize winter and some off-road capability with a bit of comfort that pickup trucks don't have. It is a compromise between both world. First of Its commercials is a snow plow truck is following a Subaru and the rest is following the snow plow. Interior and exterior design of a car is more personal taste. Same when you decide the color or colour of your vehicle. There's reason why people buy the Pontiac Astek and I could even say some ugly cars that other people like. Like the PT Cruiser, New Cherokee, Prius, Cube, Leaf, Fiat 500X, Juke just to name a few but other people loves it. I don't even like the looks of the new Rouge or the front of the new CRV. Is that mean that if means people agree if I say that the NEW forester looks better than the new Rouge or the new CRV??? I have friends who has CRV, Forester, RAV4 and RDX and all have different traits in terms of handling. But to say XT is not fun to drive is over exaggeration. I could understand if you say you're not a fan of the Turbo because I am too - don't like the turbo lag. Or maybe your definition of fun is different from mine, The RDX if fun to drive because it's 3.5 V6 and you immediately feel the power but it feel like i'm way to high but try reversing with it and not using rear camera. To sum it up, it's unfortunate that your review seemed short from what it supposed to mean for it segment.

Try testing it in a snow storm and compare it to other SUVs...

Also, Subaru USA did sell the Forester XT with manuals up until 2008. Subaru USA stopped selling them because too few customers bought them (not enough enthusiasts out there, perhaps?).

@tayl0rd553

7 жыл бұрын

2009 was when the XT w/ manual died in the States. 2008 was when you could buy the Forester XT Sport. It was the closest we ever got to the Forester STi that was available elsewhere in the world.

What about the AWD system that blows everyone else out of the water?

I bought a 2013 Forester 2.5X Premium earlier this year and I like my fozzie and I could care less about the little passenger comfort in the seats….have half of back seat folded down for even more cargo space.

what an amazing review! thank you!

Nice review - can you do the 2017 Subaru Outback (touring trim of possible)

@papashey2

7 жыл бұрын

B TYC dc8 aircraft

@papashey2

7 жыл бұрын

Dc 8 aircraft

@papashey2

7 жыл бұрын

B TYC dc8 fan jet

@papashey2

7 жыл бұрын

1950's jet airplanes

Subaru must be gobsmack after watching this dipstick review their top range forester

@jasonkresock2196

3 жыл бұрын

Amen!

What inexpensive compact SUV is more fun to drive? I've test driven the most powerful models of its Japanese competitors, and it was definitely the most fun. if you can afford a Porsche or Range Rover Evoque or Audi or BMW, I'm sure those are more fun, but the Forester is way more fun than a CRV or Murano or RAV4 ( though the X1 is Front wheel drive, so maybe not the BMW unless you spring for an X3)

thank you

So, I have been looking to buy a Crossover/SUV and I decided to test drive the top 3 that I was interested in. Mazda CX-5, Subaru Forester, and Ford Escape. All top trim levels. The CX-5 had the best reviews for comfort, drivability, roomy styling and a 40/20/40 split-fold down back row. The Escape had the best reviews for it's infotainment system, controls, torque. viewing position and possibly every bell and whistle available. The Forester had the best reviews on it's utility, view, safety features and cargo room. Long story short: The Escape I banged my head on, just getting into the driver's seat and felt more cramped than my Mustang. The Mazda was depressingly dark and drab with very little appeal and sat too low for an SUV. The Forester? It shined! All those windows made the interior very airy. The handling was light and responsive. It took corners like they were nothing and rode over train tracks like riding on a cloud. The infotainment sound system was fantastic! Big whoop it doesn't have Apple/Android blah blah. The leather seats were wonderfully comfortable as was the leather wrapped steering wheel. It's not the most aggressive looking vehicle, but it fits like a glove and performs all my needs for years to come. Now to secure financing and get a good trade in value.

You mention a lot that it falls behind others in its class and price range on many area's, but you do not list what those others are. Anyone know. I want to compare.

I drive a 15 XT. It's fun to drive and is quick. In fact, even today it's one of the quickest in its class and pushes BMW and Audi territory for much less. Not sure what the heck you're talking about. Oh and back seats do recline.

Majority of the reviews here in youtube and reddit about the forester's driving and handling is outstanding. Why would I take your review if you are the only one who didn't enjoyed driving this car?

I bought a brand new 2015 Subaru Forester 2.5i Premium for $24,500.00 There is nothing on the market that is comparable for this price in size and quality, either a 4 wheel drive or an all wheel drive models in other brands cost about $8,000 more realistically. I wanted to lift my suspension about 2 inches and had a set of studded snow tires size 235 instead of 225, I had a local tire shop put it on and it's riding about 2 inches higher, and most people wonder why I would need a studded snow tires on a Subaru?!? Last winter I was in a snow blizzard on top of a mountain, the traffic came to a halt with nowhere to go and saw people with lifted 4x4 trucks turning around and heading back up the mountain, I followed them through an icy snow covered dirt forestry service road and came down the mountain and sat in a bar drinking beer and eating pizza with the guys I followed down watching the news about the people stuck up on the mountain.

Why no comment on service intervals, windshield replacement costs $$$$

the car has 7.5 sec from 0-100 and he says turbo is not fun? What is wrong?

Forester has his own class, and you can not compare it with others. It is a great machine and is not necesary to look for flows, case you will gona find..

3 qualities I would chose in my next vehicle 1) I want a car that burns some oil 2) and a head-gasket that blows after 70k 3) and a weak automatic CVT What can I buy?

subaru review.. and no word about symetrical awd?

@jasonkresock2196

3 жыл бұрын

Unbelievable, right?

Bad review

Great car. AWD best in class off road

You should at least add annotations to your video to correct the misinformation you put out with this video. The rear seats DO recline. It would also help clarify what you mean when you reference "its competitors", if you would actually say which vehicles you're talking about. As far as features, equipment, and materials, I find it to be exactly on par with its competitors; Ford Escape, Mazda CX-5, Honda HR-V, Toyota RAV4, Chevy Equinox, etc. Are you trying to compare it to the Audi Q5, BMW X3, Mercedes GLK/GLC?? And let's be honest. What CUV/small SUV is "fun" to drive? If anyone is buying these things for corner carving or high speed runs, they're doing it wrong. The Forester is more about ruggedness, utility, and offroad ability. Hence the name "Forester". The XT is for those of us who want more grunt with our utility.

This is why I kinda check the comments first before watching. I guess your review does suck. But the vehicle is impressive.

Dude. Watching this review is like watching a fish review a bicycle.

is it just me or is this vehicle much bigger than there previous years ?

@agencialt9633

7 жыл бұрын

its slightly bigger than the previous model and looks somehow much bigger than the one before that.

the rear seats do recline.

This isn't a review, it's a personal opinion.

I just bought a 2017 with a manual... lol

test drive a subie on pavement, it's like test driving a lambo in traffic....

I choses to lease a 2015 Subaru Forester Touring after doing much research on safety, build quality, resale value, etc. Had the car for 17 months now and have found the costs of maintaining this car to be very expensive. In the four years/96,000 km that I expect to put on this vehicle, the scheduled maintenance will add up to $1000's of dollars more than any comparable SUV that I've started to investigate. If I hit 96,000 km before turning the car in, I'll be hit with a $1226. service invoice for "regular maintenance. There are at least four other service checks that range between $390. and $650., plus extras and taxes. Why hasn't anyone reported on the cost of maintaining vehicles as part of ownership. This one is slipping under the radar and not realized before it is too late! This applies to ALL Subarus. Let's not get started about having to replace all four tires if you get an irrepairable flat tire after 20 - 25,000 km., which throws the AWD out of kilter.!! Otherwise, a pretty decent vehicle.

@ks10308

7 жыл бұрын

cost of ownership? huh, guess with my previous impreza, forester, and now 17 XT i must not have noticed all of that....

You should make your own car you genius

The thing is not all SUVs can go on a lvl 4 jeep trail and achieve 28mpg. Yeah... This Subie can do it. Even my 99 forester can. One more thing: It may not be fun to drive on the road... but off the road - Oh boy!

lol what u mean not fast. maybe go S# mode 0 to 100kph in 6.1

Be prepared in about 4 years to spend $2000 for head gasket leaking

@moonsapling

5 жыл бұрын

@*Veganislife* every 35/40k miles change the fluid and you wont have problems with it.

The Forester in Canada is a compact SUV , with the likes of Rogue , CX-5, RAV4, CRV, Escape for examples not a cross-over , X-mode in the Forester gives it a 50/50 torque split between front and back plus the superior the ground clearance (8.7 in.) gives the Forester the SUV classification of off-road capable , cross overs do not have a lockup differential like a traditional 4X4 truck based SUV. Compared to the main stream brand products offered the Forester is a sleeper in disguise in the performance category .The driver controlled ( "S" Drive ) allows the driver to customize the performance of the turbo and accelerator sensitivity , thus the performance of the Forester is subjective to the driver.

@darionross4286

7 жыл бұрын

Bill Wong chill out Mazda CX-5 AWD is better for the snow u Subaru fanboy ur just dumb to think that u goof Mazda CX-5 AWD kick's Subaru ass for snow/mud/ice/off-road/city YOU GOOF!!!

@darionross4286

7 жыл бұрын

Bill Wong and u don't need a bunk turbo for the Mazda CX-5 AWD 2.0L 155HP and 165lb-ft of torque that's all u need is Good AWD and the right tires no shitty turbo here

@retiredOXT

7 жыл бұрын

yeah I get it , so does Subaru , money best spent on engineering , performance and safety instead of cosmetics

@InstinctiveFirearmReviews

7 жыл бұрын

Bill Wong maybe they should focus on interior too since we spend most of our time in there. Back seat is very non kid friendly. Gas mileage is terrible for turbo motor and requires premium gas. In Canada, that pricy.

Being the owner of a 2015 Forester XT Touring with Eyesight, I can’t recommend this vehicle compared with the new CRV, unless you absolutely need the best AWD system without having to buy an expensive Range Rover or an unreliable Jeep. Both engine options have issues and are not very efficient. The infotainment system is horrible. It’s not yet on Subaru’s new global platform, which vastly improves the improves the Impreza and Crosstrek. It’s nearly the last year of this generation, which means it’ll be obsolete and look very dated in no time. The CVT is not very responsive and has many reliability issues. While highway mpg is decent, the city mpg is nowhere near what Subaru claims. I get 17/27, not the claimed 23/28.

Subaru 241 PH is not enough? ... Hmm... For the model that is being interviewed we have to pay 38000 Euro in Europe. Stop complaining...it is a great car, I have 7.2 sec till 100 km/h.

the design is actually more than 5 years old already

I think the Forester XT is one of the best looking and functional in its class (AWD system is awesome). Unfortunately, it also seems to be one of the most dated and worst packaged vehicles.

Why didn't he talk about the engine will need to be replaced after 50,000 and burned oil every 1,000 miles.

@pancakedude5961

7 жыл бұрын

Bullshit 09 Forester 126000 miles no problems except oil changes

what lol, the 2017 crv smashes this in mpg, the Forrester is not better in any of its trims

Too bad there's no review for the trim levels most of us can afford.