Hey everyone. This is Matt. Yes, I'm still here! 😀 I’ve been busy with a top secret project so Jack Rackam has been helping me with the narration. I will still be the one making the charts and responding to comments though and I'll still be narrating from time to time. So stay tuned ... we've got lots of great stuff planned for 2020. (repeated from last week's pinned comment but still true)

@OHYS

4 жыл бұрын

Whoa first

@OHYS

4 жыл бұрын

Hi matt

@FishBoneD14

4 жыл бұрын

I trust you to deliver but still miss you

@beingwilla7639

4 жыл бұрын

Give us a hint on what the top secret project is. PLEASE

@g.carvalho6474

4 жыл бұрын

@ShalakumX Simba not Portugal

Honestly, best pronunciation of João I've ever heard from a foreign.

@darreljones8645

4 жыл бұрын

I always thought it was pronounced "joe-ah-oh".

@SSC0002

4 жыл бұрын

I thought it was "jo- ow"

@seminsulina5954

4 жыл бұрын

As a brazilian I can confirm it too lol joão he spoke it very well

@Reverse_Legend69

4 жыл бұрын

I always thought it was pronounced jsh-ow

@gustavosoares7397

4 жыл бұрын

Agreed

Host: * Says João correctly * Every brazilian in a 5km radius: * panics*

@user-ft3ve7qf3h

4 жыл бұрын

Kskkskskksksks sim

@magnumfire313

4 жыл бұрын

Kkkk

@WSWC4

4 жыл бұрын

@@user-ft3ve7qf3h stroke?

@atree9284

4 жыл бұрын

Icy Mapping And Object Shows no, brazilian laugh kkkkkkkk

@eneaganh6319

2 жыл бұрын

As a portuguese i can confirm

The host: pronounces João correctly Me: Impossible

@darbisd

4 жыл бұрын

But then he says all other names with accent 😂😂😂

@gabrielmoreno9455

4 жыл бұрын

this is the best "ão" pronounciation I ever heard from a non brazilian, this guy deserves a prize

@gustavowilliam1858

4 жыл бұрын

@@JoaoSilva-hy7bm Damn hahaha, that's why no one likes the portuguese people

@kirayoshikage2657

4 жыл бұрын

@@JoaoSilva-hy7bm the future is now old man

@Herobrine21777

4 жыл бұрын

@@JoaoSilva-hy7bm gente de Portugal é tudo babaca mesmo

Your pronunciation of João is very impressive. Great job btw

@bumblebeeeoptimus

3 жыл бұрын

"your pronunciation of João is very impressive, you must be very proud"

@rocket3216

3 жыл бұрын

@@bumblebeeeoptimus I’m just a simple man trying to make my way in the universe

@gilsonpassos1047

3 жыл бұрын

For a second I thought he was Brazilian, very good specially for an anglo

If there is a single Monarch who didnt deserved his fate, it was Pedro II

@GustavoGplay

4 жыл бұрын

Had he decided to fight for his right to the throne, Brazilian monarchy could've lasted a long time. The people at the time would probably be by his side.

@henriquesoares2343

4 жыл бұрын

He condemned himself by angering the church , the burgeoisie and the military who held control over political, spiritual and defense matters, his fall from power was inevitable

@Chactemal

4 жыл бұрын

@@henriquesoares2343 same as the Mexican emperor Maximiliano, they were cousins funnily enough and reigned at the same time

@henriquesoares2343

4 жыл бұрын

@@Chactemal yeah, but to be fair a good proportion of the royal families are all interconnected with all those marrying between them

@bearcb

4 жыл бұрын

Henrique Soares Actually his fall was a consequence of slavery abolition. Slave owner landlords supported him against the republican, abolitionist coffee producers of west São Paulo. He lost that support with the slavery abolition, and became politically isolated. Republic came just a year later.

Fun fact One of the descendants of the imperial family is a deputy in our congress right now

@kirinyan1998

4 жыл бұрын

@@menesmasterpalhaconoobyaco2396 Luiz Philippe de Orléans e Bragança

@okbro3524

4 жыл бұрын

Nice

@gabrielmoraes4992

4 жыл бұрын

Galera, por que vocês estão usando inglês? Kkkkk

@PedroSantos-te9dz

4 жыл бұрын

@@gabrielmoraes4992 pq o vídeo é gringo e se algum gringo vier ler os comentários eles n iam entende português (provavelmente)

@bernardomenezes808

4 жыл бұрын

Ironic . He was supposed to destroy them , not to join them

The best pronunciation of João Ive heard from a foreigner

Considering Monarchy ended on such a high note in Brazil I'm not surprised it is more popular than in Portugal.

@sunnecas

4 жыл бұрын

Here in Portugal it ended cause we murdered one of the kings and his son was too pressured to rule so ye we don't like monarchy that much

@EmilianoCarlosdeMoraesFirmino

4 жыл бұрын

I'm Brazilian. Nobody remember if the monarchy was good or bad in Brazil we only remember the slavery, Maria was mad and that Pedro I was horny. I would guess the votes where more from people looking at Europe's Constitutional Monarchy success in well developed countries.

@MrShedom8

4 жыл бұрын

@@EmilianoCarlosdeMoraesFirmino yup, that's the brazillian educational system for you. My history teacher as an example seemed more concerned with mocking the former monarchs than explaining what they did and their importance.

@jorgeaugusto1867

4 жыл бұрын

Its due to the frustration with the current system and the corruption that it has. "kings can't steal let's vote for a king" is the line of thought.

@phantasosxgames8488

4 жыл бұрын

@@jorgeaugusto1867 it's because of Pedro II. Brazillian Educational System sucks , really hard. But D.Pedro II was such a good leader that the only thing they can actually pulled of against him is the slavery card. Mix that with a 100 years of crappy republic and ends with monarchism been more popular here than Portugal.

It's funny to notice that, technically, the Portuguese monarchy became an offshoot of the Brazilian imperial family since Pedro II was the first son of Pedro I.

@LaPingvino

4 жыл бұрын

that's a side effect of the Portuguese empire having been ruled from Brazil at the end, with Rio de Janeiro as the capital

@CB0408

4 жыл бұрын

That's a side effect of, techically, Portugal having gained independence from Brazil in 1822

@harushinonomiya

4 жыл бұрын

In my opnion this dynasty was only a continuation of the portuguese but in Brazil and I also think that the initial strategy was make a Personal Union in the two countries in this case either Brazil and Portugal was be equal.And the Empire would stay as in the old Portuguese Empire.But by the way that doesn't happened.

@matheussalatielborgescorrea

4 жыл бұрын

actually Maria II was the oldest daughter of Pedro IV/ I

@rb98769

4 жыл бұрын

Matheus Salatiel Holstein Yes, but the succession in Portuguese law favored male heirs, like in the rest of Europe. Afaik, Pedro I legally split the Brazilian line from the Portuguese line so they have no claims on one another’s throne, so it doesn’t make much of a difference.

That “João”. It was perfect. How?!

@pretendtheresaname9213

4 жыл бұрын

He pronounced it as jo-ow

@jpteix

4 жыл бұрын

My name is João. I can say that his pronunciation was perfect.

@pretendtheresaname9213

4 жыл бұрын

@@teacoffee42 I speak portuguese, I know it. I'm saying he didn't use the nasal sound, he pronounced it as jo-ow, got it?

@couves2

4 жыл бұрын

@@pretendtheresaname9213 he didnt pronounce it as jo-ow

@---sy7cr

3 жыл бұрын

Mas, Pedrow, Mariah...

3:17 The former tsar of Bulgaria is actually alive today. He succeeded his father in 1943 at the age of 6 aand is one of two remaining living heads of state from the time of World War II. He was also elected as prime minister in 2001. This could possibly make a good April fools video - "Who would be tsar of Bulgaria today"

@shewannabanghim7809

4 жыл бұрын

Ooof

@gunarsmiezis9321

4 жыл бұрын

Bulgaria is not a grate (or even regional) power so its ruler must be king not tsar.

@thenewcaesar2668

4 жыл бұрын

@@gunarsmiezis9321 The title was Tsar. Bulgaria used to be a regional power.

@gunarsmiezis9321

4 жыл бұрын

@@thenewcaesar2668 But that is not the Bulgaria of today. Else we need to call Elizabeth II an empress.

@nikolaytsankov9066

4 жыл бұрын

@@gunarsmiezis9321 A title's existence has nothing to do with how much power the title's possessor has. There were many emperors that ruled over small countries and many people with lesser titles that ruled over larger countries. The Grand dukes of Lithuania had 4 times as much land as the Kings of England, yet they were inferior in rank. The last Byzantine emperors had very little power and control, so did many Roman emperors. The kings of Meath ruled over lands 100 times smaller than the kings of France, yet both are kings. The tsars of Bulgaria ruled over lands 100 times smaller than the tsars of Russia, yet both were tsars.

Through some genealogical research I only just recently found out that my 17th Great uncle was the first Duke of Braganza through an illegitimate line. So even though it’s very distant, and he probably has lots of descendants, it’s kind of surreal knowing that I’m not only related to the kings of Portugal but also the emperors of Brazil 😳

@anotheraccount444

2 жыл бұрын

If you have european ancestry, you definitively have royal ancestry. I'm brazilian with german ancestry that came from the region of Lothringen, I made contact with "relatives" from Germany, and they showed me documents showing our ancestry to the kings and queens of the german states going back to Charlemagne.

@anotheraccount444

2 жыл бұрын

If you have european ancestry, you definitively have royal ancestry. I'm brazilian with german ancestry that came from the region of Lothringen, I made contact with "relatives" from Germany, and they showed me documents showing our ancestry to the kings and queens of the german states going back to Charlemagne.

@gcneto

2 жыл бұрын

@@anotheraccount444 yep, I'm Brazilian and am a descendent of the first royal house of Portugal (the Afonsine line) through a bastard son of King Dinis I, which in turn makes me a descendent of basically all of the great dynasties from the High Medieval Era backwards all the way to Charlemagne and the first Visigothic kings in Iberia. Most people of European ancestry can probably find one bastard or lesser noble in their ancestry and through that connect to the rest of the European houses

Brazil: is going well in any aspect. The brazilian army: I'm about to end this man's whole career.

@mojeo522

4 жыл бұрын

Ever since 1889 the army has been going down hill. Onumerous revolts, 1930, 1964...

@antoniocauam3128

3 жыл бұрын

In fact, only 25% of the military were republicans, only a hundred military participated in the notorious coup on November 15, 1889.

@lucaslobofer4417

3 жыл бұрын

@@antoniocauam3128 25% is too high yet

@antoniocauam3128

3 жыл бұрын

@@lucaslobofer4417 But for democratic purposes that might try to justify that barbarism that only 100 low-ranking military men did, not much because the military at that time was less than 0.1% of the population of the country, which at the time was 15 million people, and of the rest of the population less than 1% was republican, and the emperor was at his peak of popularity after the abolition of slavery passive and victimless.

@goukeban6197

3 жыл бұрын

" I'm about to end this man's whole career." Is one of the most cancerous memes in recent years.

6:50 - quick correction, Prince Pedro abdicated his claim to the Brazilian throne, but he, and his descendants kept the claims to the French throne

So Portugal became independent from Brazil

@theomegapyrope9715

4 жыл бұрын

its funny if you think that the UKBPA had its capital in brazil, not portugal, even after the end of mad corsican general the braganzas really do some bizarre but fantastic things

@rodrigomonaliberx8968

3 жыл бұрын

@@theomegapyrope9715 no

@theomegapyrope9715

3 жыл бұрын

@@rodrigomonaliberx8968 yes

@rodrigomonaliberx8968

3 жыл бұрын

@@theomegapyrope9715 i brazian and i dont know wot u say so no

@rodrigomonaliberx8968

3 жыл бұрын

@@theomegapyrope9715 Brazil need back monarchy..

the House of Brazil has a better claim for Portugal's throne than Don Miguel's line

@kapira77ss

4 жыл бұрын

Shit, I realized that now that you said lol

@aposapocalypse7117

3 жыл бұрын

Actually they dont because they renounced the all claims to the portuguese throne after ascending to the Brazilian throne

@guareschicarvalho942

3 жыл бұрын

@@aposapocalypse7117 Not so much. Pedro I renounced his rights but left Queen Maria II who was still a brazilian-born queen of Portugal so the succession line would still have Brazilian blood. Its just that the brazilian House now is Orleans and Bragança and no more Bragança and Habsburg

@imperiumbrasiliae

3 жыл бұрын

No because the brazilian line is female

@senhordoutorprofessormestr8629

3 жыл бұрын

Yes ksksksks

KZreadr: João Brasileiros e portugueses: Caralhooooooooo

Brazil feared becoming a colony again because the Portuguese constitutional assembly wanted to make it a colony again. They started discussions before the Brazilian representatives arrived, and we were already underrepresented by design. Then they tried to dismantle the kingdom of Brazil and make it so that every province would be ruled directly from Lisbon. Up to that point Brazilians were mostly not for independence, and Brazilian representatives in the constitutional assembly warned the Portuguese that that would be unacceptable and lead to revolt or revolution (and they also warned that their loyalties were with Brazil, not the assembly). Obviously, when the news arrived in Rio, the Brazilians weren't pleased with that, and that's when D. Pedro first outright disregarded an order from the Portuguese constitutional assembly, with the support of the Brazilians of course. That's what led to independence: Portugal wanted not only to make Brazil a colony, but to destroy the very existence of Brazil as a single entity so it would never threaten metropolitan hegemony.

@jonnyso1

4 жыл бұрын

Had that hapened, Brazil would probably become multiple countries like the spanish colony.

@395leandro

2 жыл бұрын

@@jonnyso1 Had the Assembly respected the Brazilian status of united kingdom we could still be a single country today (the United Kingdom of Portugal, Brazil and Algarves) and could more easily have afforded the Ultramarine War and kept the African and Asian colonies, expelled the French from the Guianas and kept the Cisplatine... (not to mention ambitions of expanding into Bolivia to claim their Pacific coast). The Kingdom could still be alive today being a major imperial global power to rival anyone.

@thanhhoangnguyen4754

Жыл бұрын

@@395leandro To be honest with you my friends the land of Portugal in Europe is nothing compare to latin America. And that not only the side. Think it like the USA. But it seems the Portugal court don't see this. Just all of the land map comparing it to Portugal. Beside the balance of Europe is alway a powder keg. Better move your to your colony in these case Brazil is the best choice.

@Mdi0305

Жыл бұрын

You know very well that those who made Brazil were from Portugal. The native were crushed. And Brazil were created by Portugez seeds . And later the portugez seeds who were born in Brazil wanted the indipenden from their origin land . Is it a civil war?. It happen the same in every spanish colony who the spanish seeds wanted the indipendance from their origin, the same in USA. So in every colony the real native people were crushed, and the war was between the same origin those who came from europe. It was all about power and wealth. However what king of portugal did is that he keep united the portugez colony that later became Brazil. If it wasnt for the king the portugez colony would be splitet like spanish colony with different states. Today the power and the healthy is in the hand of the people with europian origin in usa the anglosaxon, in latin america spanish origin and in brazil portugez origin. The native were crushed and they are still crushed.

@robertoprimordial2633

10 ай бұрын

​@@thanhhoangnguyen4754é o que sempre penso . A Reino Unido de Portugal, Brasil com sede no Brasil seria a melhor solução

Last time I was this early, the Portuguese royal family was fleeing to Brazil to avoid Napoleon

1st. Yes, first time ever I hear an English speaker pronounce João correctly! :D Congrats! 2nd. Curious facts: When Brazil became independent, certain African kingdoms whose economy depended heavily on slave trade requested to become colonies of Brazil to benefit of the close relationship. Pedro rejected the idea. Also, Greece was going through its own process of independence from the Ottoman Empire and looking for a king of their own. Before they settled for Otto, they actually asked Pedro I if he would be interested and even came up with some lineage linking him to the Byzantine emperors (I don't know if to Constantine I or XI, one of the two). So, there is some alternate timeline in the multiverse where Rio becomes the capital a transatlantic *and* Mediterranean Empire. Would it have prevented the republican coup? Would it have outlasted WW I and II? How the close connection of Brazil, Greece and some African countries affect each of these countries? What would an afro-luso-brazilian-hellenic society look like? We'll never know but it's fun to imagine. :)

Prince Luis is the rightful heir to the throne. Pedro's abdication was not required by the constitution, and yet he did it. He signed the papers, and there is no going back. Even today, any member of the house who won't marry into royalty must resign. You should have mentioned how Isabel's descendents married...

@amitystan

Жыл бұрын

I’m pretty sure they changed the laws so they can marry non-royals, and if they didn’t, then honestly it shouldn’t be that big of a deal since all the monarchs are marrying peasants specially bcause there are so few monarchies ( and the inbreeding would be more intense than it already is if they continued to marry other royals ) and they want the people’s sympathy

i'm impressed you can pronounce "ã" perfectly. people who doesnt speak portuguese seem to be unable to pronounce it correctly

Quando ele falou "João" Eu imaginei que fosse brasileiro (ou um lusofônico nato), Mano, muito perfeito. Mas, sobre o vídeo, está muito bom! 👏❤️

@Cercy-vm5hm

2 жыл бұрын

Também fiquei pasma por aqui com a pronúncia dele kkkkk arrasou

Monarchism is a rising and pretty popular topic in Brazil

@arolemaprarath3248

3 жыл бұрын

Evidence?

@lordarthur2165

2 жыл бұрын

@@arolemaprarath3248 as a Brazilian I can confirm that, but a lot of those people that love the monarch are just people from the right trying to be different (in my opinion), they don't make any sense and most of the population makes fun of them.

@user-rv4wn5qk7q

2 жыл бұрын

@@lordarthur2165 As a Brazilian, I disagree, most of the monarchists legitimely know the history of our country and that's why they support the change for a monarchy. Could you imagine the United States being deprived of their founding fathers like George Washington and all of that? That is a weird thought, and is exactly what we are going through being disconnected to our real founding fathers. My thought is that Brazil would work way better as a Constitutional Monarchy under a Emperor as moderator power, just like it was in the 19th Century - but of course, with adaptations to our current times, we desperately need it and I am thankful that the movement is growing to restore our identity, pride and glory.

@lordarthur2165

2 жыл бұрын

@@user-rv4wn5qk7q Bro don't talk about the founding fathers, they are just a mythos, they were just a bunch of white men wanting to become independent because of taxes. i am talking about all the monarchists I saw, they didn't make any sense, if you are a monarchist, why are you supporting neoliberal/fascists (the two common ones) ideals. We don't need founding fathers, that's just stupid.

@user-rv4wn5qk7q

2 жыл бұрын

@@lordarthur2165 It was a metaphor, check your text interpretation.

The end of the brazilian monarchy was a coupe d' état made to the Army

@drswag0076

4 жыл бұрын

that's right Brazil's first president was a general.

@EdsondoCarmoOoO

4 жыл бұрын

@@drswag0076 yes, the marshall Deodoro da Fonseca, was who applied the coupe d'état

@ryantropicalia9499

4 жыл бұрын

@@EdsondoCarmoOoO it's also good to point that The reason of the coup was because of the abolition of slavery (because the farmers) aswell the feeling of being forgotten by the emperor after the Paraguayan War

@EdsondoCarmoOoO

4 жыл бұрын

@@ryantropicalia9499 yes. Because the brazilian navy are more evaluated , the second powerul navy of The world and the army underrated a lot

@KentoKei

4 жыл бұрын

Coup d'état

Everyone talking about his "João" pronunciation, but have you paid attention to his "Gastão" pronunciation at 8:25? That was very good as well

@weepingscorpion8739

3 жыл бұрын

I came looking for this comment, and finally I found it! :)

@ixaeew9586

3 жыл бұрын

Parece que ele falou tipo que gastou muito

As some say in Portugal, “While most of the people don’t care about the system of government, there is a minority, the Monarchists, and an even smaller minority, the Republicans.”

@darkend1998

4 жыл бұрын

Yea,almost no one cares to vote in the 2019 election 5,71 million didn't vote that's 52% of the entire population, there where 255 thousand invalid votes. When the Monarchist only add 8,5 thousand. Hahahaha. I guess that most of ous think that our "favourite" party is either going to win or loss so why should we vote (I only know of a handful of people that voted and they are hardcore members of said parties ) Most of the "lossing" communist and monarchist I think didn't even vote. Especially the non hardcore monarchist, being I one of them and some people that I know, the party is laughable at best and sad at the worst.

@avantelvsitania3359

4 жыл бұрын

Cris Teix não confundas o ser monárquico com PPM. A Monarquia não é uma ideologia, log não deve ter um partido. A maior parte dos monárquicos votam noutros partidos. Além disso o PPM nem reconhece SAR o Duque de Bragança como o legítimo herdeiro do Trono de Portugal, por isso a maioria dos monárquicos entra logo em desacordo.

@darkend1998

4 жыл бұрын

@@avantelvsitania3359 ya eu sei por isso eu disse que o partido monárquico é para rir e chorar. Ninguém leva eles a sério, eu levo mais o Coelho da Madeira a sério. Se lembro me certo o projeto deles nas eleições era de 1900 e tal hahaha, como eles conseguiram 8,5 mil votos é um milagre em si. E acho que das a razão que D.Duarte é o melhor candidato para a coroa portuguesa? E se ouve-se um Verdadeiro partido monárquico com a sua ideologia bem definida e líderes, não comediantes ias ver se não tinha mais sucesso. PS:o PPM faz campanha? pois só lembro me de ver eles uma vez agora na TV e foi para dizer que o projeto já tava desenhado a muitos anos, como se os problemas do país no tempo do meu avô são os mesmo do que agora😂. Não vi mais nada🤔.

@neinno8172

4 жыл бұрын

@@darkend1998 Sure it may be petty now, but it is frequent in history- the most unlikely, or unpopular- ideologies rise to dominance, such as Leninism in Russia, Nazism in Germany. Though I doubt they'll be nothing more than a laughing stock for the foreseeable future.

@darkend1998

4 жыл бұрын

@@neinno8172 I guess you never heard of the Monarchist party in Portugal. They don't accept the Duke of Bragança, the one that's universally accepted by portuguese law and people, has the head of royal house. There political plan hasn't been changed since 20th century and there leader is a laughing stock. There leader is the Trump of Portuguese politic.

2:49 European sure do love beards this channel points them out every time

@UsefulCharts

4 жыл бұрын

🧔

@jmcmontanheiro

4 жыл бұрын

And mustaches! Queen Victoria stated in one or her diaries that there was no point in kissing a man without a mustache

Pedro II was so open mind with liberties and new ideas of progress that that was actually the reason (by historians) of the coup. That coup was promoted by business man and bourgeois class that look his modern ideals as very extreme and they wanted maintain the status quo, slavery, and poor class uneducated. In today's Brazil, the monarchical movement increase every year. Probably trying to put state issues such as the separation of the head of State and Government, the neutrality and arbitrarily of a modern monarch, and the lower cost of a monarchy (which is common inverse argument of republican promoters but not the factual reality, at least in Europe). It's so big the monarchical movement, that is common to see a imperial flag on football games, protests or in an apartment's balcony. Although it sounds crazy, Brazil is a possible candidate to seriously consider the return to the monarchy (parliamentary and constitutional of course) in a future, along with Romania and another couple of countries..

If I live long enough to see my beloved country become a monarchy once again, I will shed tears of happiness, no joke.

@stevejohnson3357

2 жыл бұрын

Whenever I hear about the current and probably most of the former presidents of Brazil I remember that the monarchy was over thrown to preserve slavery. Monarchy is unpopular today but the bad monarch problem can equaled or exceeded by the deluded voter problem.

@oravlaful

Жыл бұрын

gui lho ti na

@Noname-nz6vx

Жыл бұрын

@@oravlaful No teu cool

@VinyZikss

Жыл бұрын

why? Why would it be any different, in fact it could be a lot lot worse. One person controlling everything is almost never a good thing

@CursedAnqxl

Жыл бұрын

no, no they have a point. unlike monarchs in other places, brazil's can be easily seen as one of the better ones out there. also, the republican experiment clearly worked a treat with all of its corruption and deforestation and building a giant wall around the favelas in rio so that tourists don't see that a lot of brazilians are suffering. not saying that republican brazil did only bad things, but it is easy to blame all modern problems on the republic of brazil and then also easy to wish for a monarchist brazil once again, since the first one seems better than what they may have been taught at school funded under a pro republican brazil. also when I say republican I don't mean all that bs with the united states political parties, it just means that it is a republic. I won't say which one is better because I don't live in brazil but I assume the brazilian people would know best about it.

Long live the Imperial Family, and Hail the Empire of Brazil!

I can’t help but stress how good of a pronunciation of “João” that was. Indeed one of the best, if not THE best, i’ve ever heard. I’m curious about your formation, my dear fellow. How come you understand that much about brazilian monarchy history line when most of the country’s citizen doesn’t even know it exists till nowadays? Cheers, m8. Keep up the good work!

UsefulCharts: Ya there are Portuguese, Brazilian, and French royal blood in the family tree. Me: *UNITED KINGDOMS OF BRAZIL, PORTUGAL, AND FRANCE!*

@chevalierduchrist1754

3 жыл бұрын

Dont forget Austria!

@arx3516

3 жыл бұрын

Why not put Italy, Spain and Greece too?

@pparisps5141

3 жыл бұрын

Yes let's create the Brazilian Roman Empire

@Tucano08

3 жыл бұрын

Europa, França e Bahia!

@Sindromy

2 жыл бұрын

@@pparisps5141 Goat

Let's restore te monarchy!

Forgot Leopoldine von Habsburg

Vassouras is a city in rio de janeiro where i live and just like petropolis ( Pedros Town ) is a imperial city that pays homage and respects to D.Pedro II, Our emporor was taken away from us we respect what he and his father did very much, and for most brazilians he is and always will be the best ruler this country ever had.

Prince Antônio is in hospital right now, recovering from COVID-19. Pray for him!

I had no idea monarchism was so popular in Brazil. I’m rooting for you

@jubettepinheiro

10 ай бұрын

The referendum shown was in 1993. Probably today is even more popular, because we often say that the republic failed. It’s a very popular opinion actually.

I'm brazilian ,monarchist, the brazilian republic is result of a coup d'etat, i pray to god to see the Empire of Brazil

@BubbaJ18

3 жыл бұрын

Who do you think should be monarch? Pedro Carlos or Luiz? I working on a project and your thoughts would help

@gesielduarte

3 жыл бұрын

@@BubbaJ18 Prince Pedro deliberately renouced to the throne so his children were not born in the succession line, the vassouras house is the undisputed successor line, Dom Luiz is the head of the house and his brother Dom Bertrand is the most famous leader of the brazilian monarchist movement.

@VinyZikss

Жыл бұрын

Mano falando serio? Por quê? Por que uma monarquia seria melhor pra gente

@Adri-r5t

Жыл бұрын

​@@VinyZikss eu nunca tinha pensado nisso de monarquia, mas ultimamente tem me agradado a ideia de ter alguém no poder que fosse ensinado/criado para essa função específica. É claro que o rei não seria absoluto, ele deveria obedecer à constituição. Mas já pensou na estabilidade que o país teria? O rei não precisaria se preocupar com eleições a cada 4 anos, teria muito mais possibilidade de fazer planos a longo prazo, acabaria com essa polarização que a gente vive hoje. Se organizar direitinho fica bom pra todos. (Mas é óbvio que isso nunca vai acontecer, preferimos ficar votando sempre nos mesmos c*rruptos)

The video: who would be the brazilian emperor? Me, a brazilian monarchist: *I AM FOUR PARALEL UNIVERSES AHEAD OF YOU*

@theomegapyrope9715

4 жыл бұрын

*monarchist

@Riickastleey

4 жыл бұрын

@@theomegapyrope9715 sorry man, my fault

@theomegapyrope9715

4 жыл бұрын

no trouble mate

@luisdouets5896

4 жыл бұрын

gado

@theomegapyrope9715

4 жыл бұрын

.

7:20 The Republicans made the vote more leaning to republic because I. Most of the Brazilian people didn't known how good was a Monarchy or didn't known much of the Brazilian history in the 19th century II. The Republicans didn't let the pretenders to appear in Television, which made the people fear who was going to be the Brazilian Emperor Etc.

@jmcmontanheiro

4 жыл бұрын

"people didn't known how good was a Monarchy": That's because it was never good in the first place

@ryantropicalia9499

4 жыл бұрын

@@jmcmontanheiro ain't true The Monarchy made Brazil rise then after the coup Brazil fell into an Oligarchy

@jeatcleave

4 жыл бұрын

@@jmcmontanheiro There are so many monarchists that post on these royalty videos. It's very strange.

@mohdghazali3473

4 жыл бұрын

@@jeatcleave That because Emperor Pedro II was very popular. Did you know right after he was overthrown and forced to live in exiled, many Brazilian population start to realise the first president rule Brazil as a dictactor full of corrupotion. Infact many Republican at that time even if they still support Republic government and refused to adopt monarchism, they regret forcing Emperor Pedro II to lived in exiled. Many republican supporter start to say that the biggest sin the rerpublic government have was forcing Pedro II lived in exiled. Infact after he died, the Brazilian government try to hide the fact until the new instantly shocked the whole country that Pedro II died a long time ago and was buried in Portugal in the House of Barganza Cemetery by the Portuguese Republican government. The new instantly lead to a growing movement to bring back Pedro II body to Brazil. For a moment, the Republican government refused. But Brazilian favour the Brazilian Indenpendent Day more than Republic Day, more and more statued of him was erected at town across Brazil until a presidential candidate promise to bring back his body and he win the election. So they begin to allowed the member of Braganza to return to Brazil and Emperor Pedro II body was finally allowed to return. One Brazilian Historian recount , that all of Brazilian was crying at the street watching their beloved Emperor return to his homeland, his nation. There were White Brazilian, Afro-Brazilian present but at that time there were no difference, they were all Brazilian.

@mohdghazali3473

4 жыл бұрын

@@jeatcleave This what the wikipedia said he was Emperor Pedro the Magnanimous, "Isabel wished to hold a discreet and private burial ceremony, but she eventually agreed to the French government's request for a state funeral. On 9 December, thousands of mourners attended the ceremony at La Madeleine. Aside from Pedro's family, these included: Francesco II, former king of the Two Sicilies; Isabel II, former queen of Spain; Philippe, comte de Paris; and other members of European royalty. Also present were General Joseph Brugère, representing President Sadi Carnot; the presidents of the Senate and the Chamber of Deputies as well as their members; diplomats; and other representatives of the French government. Nearly all members of the Institut de France were in attendance.Other governments from the Americas and Europe sent representatives, as did Ottoman Turkey, China, Japan and Persia.Following the services, the coffin was taken in procession to the railway station to begin its trip to Portugal. Around 300,000 people lined the route under incessant rain and cold.The journey continued on to the Church of São Vicente de Fora near Lisbon, where the body of Pedro was interred in the Royal Pantheon of the House of Braganza on 12 December. The Brazilian republican government, "fearful of a backlash resulting from the death of the Emperor", banned any official reaction. Nevertheless, the Brazilians were far from indifferent to Pedro's demise, and "repercussions in Brazil were also immense, despite the government's effort to suppress. There were demonstrations of sorrow throughout the country: shuttered business activity, flags displayed at half-staff, black armbands on clothes, death knells, religious ceremonies."Masses were held in memory of Pedro throughout Brazil, and he and the monarchy were praised in the eulogies that followed.

The thing about monarchy is that you have them on your thumbs. Politicians are as slippery as a barrel full of eels, they cannot be held accountable, shit happens and they peaced out.

I sense a monarchist invasion coming here soon....

@imperiumbrasiliae

4 жыл бұрын

make me president i will restore the monarchy

@joao.fenix1473

4 жыл бұрын

Monarchist counter-revolution rather

@ShamanMcLamie

4 жыл бұрын

The only reason I'd like to see Brazil become a monarchy is because the Imperial Flag is one of the coolest flags I've ever seen.

@rakdar1714

4 жыл бұрын

Francis Igor Bird Glory, Bird Empire!

@caiawlodarski5339

4 жыл бұрын

@@rakdar1714 kkkkkkk

Dom Pedro II, our best leader.

@pedrorocha4817

4 жыл бұрын

Slaves disagree.

@eleanorrigby9826

4 жыл бұрын

@@pedrorocha4817 Pq?... Se foi a própria monarquia que aboliu a escravidão. Sendo inclusive um dos motivos para os fazendeiros apoiarem a Proclamação da Republica.

@pedrorocha4817

4 жыл бұрын

Não foi a monarquia, mas a Princesa Isabel. Dom Pedro I e Dom Pedro II nunca tiveram coragem de pagar o preço que custaria acabar com essa barbárie.

@miguelmontenegro3520

4 жыл бұрын

@@pedrorocha4817 Fica quieto aí. Dom Pedro I tentou sim, passar leis abolicionistas, mas o congresso/senado (não lembro o nome da época) rejeitou a legislação.

@pedrorocha4817

4 жыл бұрын

I ou II?

Great video! I am Brazilian and monarchist. Prince Pedro de Alcântara renounced his dynastic rights to enter into a morganatic marriage. Therefore, his descendants (the Petrópolis Branch) are not entitled to succession to the throne. Ergo, Prince Luiz is currently the first in the line of succession, as he is the head of the Imperial House (of the Vassouras Branch). The Petrópolis Branch conducts morganatic weddings, which was expressly prohibited in our Imperial Constitution and is still prohibited in the internal rules of the Imperial Family.

3:25 The Monarchs: *doing well* Some curse a monk laid on them like 20 years ago: I'm about to end this family's whole career

I still pray that one day Brazil can go back to being a monarchy

@ktaedear

Жыл бұрын

Não

@henriquevieiradalpoz8855

Жыл бұрын

@@ktaedear e uma monarquia raíz, não essas "repúblicas coroadas" (onde o monarca não manda em nada) tipo o Reino Unido

Damn. That João was the best i've heard from a foreigner

Me when Foreign talking João correctly:"He is to dangerous to live"

@kemellymendes5033

4 жыл бұрын

Ele tá de parabéns

The information that I learned in school is that was Isabel who banish slavery. She signed the Áurea law.

@miguelangelo3851

4 жыл бұрын

Pedro II was trying to banish slavery a long time before her, he wasnt sucessful because of the farmers that had influence on the senate

@LandgraabIV

4 жыл бұрын

She signed it as regent on her father's behalf, not as the monarch who was still Pedro II. Similarly, it was Leopoldina who actually signed the independence declaration as regent while the monarch, Pedro I was in São Paulo.

@TheMGIvideos

4 жыл бұрын

@@miguelangelo3851 and somehow they're just as influent in brazil

@pedrorocha4817

4 жыл бұрын

He was a coward liberal. Princess Isabel had the courage to face the consequences.

@DaviRenania

3 жыл бұрын

Pedro II was traveling in Europe, so Isabel had to sign the Golden Law in his name.

Finally! I have been waiting for ages! And my waiting has been awarded with a magnificent video!

Your pronunciation of João is amazing. From a João 😉👏

The chart is amazing, my GF is from the Portugal royal family (a branch from it) we are talking about it right now.

Interesting fact: the treaty that ended Brazil war of independence (treaty of Rio de Janeiro, 1825), maintained both Pedro I and his father Dom João as emperors of Brazil, but João was only in title, he didn't had even a cerimonial, just the title, and it was just for seven months

Brazil would do much better under a constitutional monarchy. Combine this with decentralization to the city would be ideal.

@---.-----

2 жыл бұрын

I wish the restoration, but if it's a constitutional monarchy that we're talking about, than I'd rather remain a republic.

@ThiagoSouza-eo1mi

Жыл бұрын

You are absolutely correct!

@oravlaful

Жыл бұрын

guilhotina é a unica coisa que monarcas merecem

@amitystan

Жыл бұрын

@@oravlaful literalmente nada haver, ALGUNS monarcas sim como Ivan o terrível, mas outros como os modernos da Dinamarca, Noruega e etc, e alguns do passado como a famosa Elizabeth 1ª com certeza não pq eles realmente fizeram bem ás nações deles, monarquia não é sinônimo de ditadura

@tiagolira8742

Жыл бұрын

Brazil was born like this, constitutional monarchy. I hope one day it will be again. As a Brazilian, I really hope for that. We would be a more organized and fair country.

That referendum was invalid, we brazilians learn almost nothing about our monarchy days and the govern didnt allow the princes to appear in public

Curiosity: Luiz Philippe de Orléans e Bragança is a descendant of the emperors of Brazil Pedro I and Pedro II and pretender to the extinct title of Príncipe de Orléans and Bragança. In 2019 he assumed the position of federal deputy for the state of São Paulo, after being elected in the 2018 general elections. He is the first member of the Brazilian imperial family to hold a relevant political position since the Proclamation of the Republic, on November 15, 1889.

That João pronounced correctly was the cherry on top of the cake... Tu é o cara mano!!!!

Great video!! Very nice to see Brazilian history taught outside of Brazil. Now, as a matter of fact, it was princess Isabel the responsibe for the of slavery, in 1888, not her father. Please keep doing these, as I looooved seeing this!!

Wasn't a Brazilian prince killed in the Air France crash in the Atlantic several years back? Who was his father?

@sergiolucena9606

4 жыл бұрын

Yes, and he was the elder son of prince Antônio

@sergiolucena9606

4 жыл бұрын

@Marechal Zolotoy its true but that was the younger son of princess Isabel who did not have any heir

@hotlinesanzensekai7084

4 жыл бұрын

Yes. He was Rafael's brother, Pedro Luís, son of prince Antônio.

Ave Império

@guilhermebispo9

4 жыл бұрын

AVE GLÓRIA!!!!

I'm a brazilian and the Princes that would make the reigning family should the Referendum pass in Brazil, were outlawed to appear in TV, at a time where it was the only means of communication to the general public; newspapers lost popularity way before the News Channel lost its credibility (lol). The video also mentioned the Yays of the referendum too... Fun fact, the referendum got more popular than any president since at least the military dictatorship from 1964-1985. In other words, the center-leftists in power done the monarchists dirty, unsurprisingly.

@MarcoAurelio-vv3gz

4 жыл бұрын

@ShalakumX Simba Populistic yes,authoritarian is an exaggeration. Even though the president has a sympathy to the miltary dictatorship of 1964 and a lot of other flaws. We are still a democracy with all his flaws. (Almost all alive presidents of brazil have been prosecuted for corruption and I don't believe the actual will be a exception) Both brazilian left and right are full of conspiracies views...

@joao.fenix1473

4 жыл бұрын

@ShalakumX Simba Your Canadian perspective is totally wrong. This government is neither populist neither authoritarian. It's mainstream conservative

@joao.fenix1473

4 жыл бұрын

@ShalakumX Simba Since when all your claims are true and not a piece of western Journalistic propaganda? Prove that he burned the forest you probably didn't even knew it existed before the international scandals

@rb98769

4 жыл бұрын

I think it is widely accepted that the referendum was quite blatantly sabotaged, although I still don’t think monarchy would get a majority vote back then.

@Lu-zj4nu

4 жыл бұрын

@@joao.fenix1473 Tell me if a president says that the minority should bow to the majority with these exact words, would he still be considered just a conservative? and if the president in congress would praise a dictator that is know for torture is it ok? i could keep going if you wish to start a discussion, and i can provide video prove of those, but i'm pretty sure you already saw it. The Far right wing of brazil is ashamed of itself and pretend that never did those things even when there is prove they say bullshit and them pretend that it is fake news. but even those who voted for bolsonaro know about all that they are corrupted by this system and will keep pretending that it is fake

Great video!

Actually it wasn't Pedro II who abolished slavery, it was his daughter Isabel, who acted as regent, and it has she, who signed the law to abolish slavery.

@LandgraabIV

4 жыл бұрын

She signed it as regent on her father's behalf, not as the monarch who was still Pedro II, so technically, yes it was him. Similarly, it was Leopoldina who actually signed the independence declaration as regent while the monarch, Pedro I was in São Paulo.

@Budah_01

4 жыл бұрын

A Lei áurea or The Golden Law

@Budah_01

4 жыл бұрын

@ShalakumX Simba No, she constantly ruled as regent as her father Pedro was old and tired.

@LandgraabIV

4 жыл бұрын

@ShalakumX Simba Well, SHE was regent when slavery was abolished. Princess Isabel was born in July 1846. Slavery was abolished in May 1888, so that would make her a 41-year-old child. haha

@louisbeerreviews8964

4 жыл бұрын

David Ringmann it’s is

I believe Luís has the right to be the monarch. I'd gladly support a brazilian monarchy. Hello from Paraguay.

@fabricio-agrippa-zarate

4 жыл бұрын

@@v1n1c1u55anto5 obviously.

@thessop9439

4 жыл бұрын

@@fabricio-agrippa-zarate That didnt end well for you last time...

@fabricio-agrippa-zarate

4 жыл бұрын

@@thessop9439 it wasn't the fault of our people, we just suffered from the action of our despot dictator Solano López, who challenges both Argentina and Brazil meddling in a problem that wasn't his nor the people's.

@thessop9439

4 жыл бұрын

@@fabricio-agrippa-zarate I was going to blame brazil. Those oportunistic scumbags ruined paraguay for another 100 years

@v.santos7035

4 жыл бұрын

@@thessop9439 if u were going to blame Brazil, then u totally wrong.

Great video, friend. Hugs from Brazil.

Imagine a world where the former royal houses of Europe rule over their former colonies; Orleans in Quebec Romanov in Alaska Braganza in Brazil

@FelipeCarreiro

2 жыл бұрын

*** Orleans and Braganza in Brazil ***

@Lucas-ei1ms

Жыл бұрын

They all are Brazilian since 1822 when declared the independence, the only thing is that they are descendant of other royal houses, but they all are born in Brazil.

Pedro II was credited as a truly "wise, benevolent, austere and honest ruler", said historian Ricardo Salles. The positive view of Pedro II, and nostalgia for his reign, only grew as the nation quickly fell into a series of economic and political crises which Brazilians attributed to the Emperor's overthrow. Strong feelings of guilt manifested among republicans, and these became increasingly evident upon the Emperor's death in exile. In Brazil, the news of the Emperor's death "aroused a genuine sense of regret among those who, without sympathy for a restoration, acknowledged both the merits and the achievements of their deceased ruler." His remains, as well as those of his wife, were returned to Brazil in 1921 in time for the centenary of the Brazilian independence. The government granted Pedro II dignities befitting a head of state. A national holiday was declared and the return of the Emperor as a national hero was celebrated throughout the country. Thousands attended the main ceremony in Rio de Janeiro where, according to historian Pedro Calmon, the "elderly people cried. Many knelt down. All clapped hands. There was no distinction between republicans and monarchists. They were all Brazilians." This homage marked the reconciliation of Republican Brazil with its monarchical past. Historians have expressed high regard for Pedro II and his reign. The scholarly literature dealing with him is vast and, with the exception of the period immediately after his ouster, overwhelmingly positive, and even laudatory. He has been regarded by several historians in Brazil as the greatest Brazilian. In a manner similar to methods which were used by republicans, historians point to the Emperor's virtues as an example to be followed, although none go so far as to advocate a restoration of the monarchy. Historian Richard Graham noted that "[m]ost twentieth-century historians, moreover, have looked back on the period [of Pedro II's reign] nostalgically, using their descriptions of the Empire to criticize-sometimes subtly, sometimes not-Brazil's subsequent republican or dictatorial regimes.

@mohdghazali3473

4 жыл бұрын

Unlike Mexico who still refused to accept it's monarchial past, the Irtubide period. As far as i know, he doesn't had any official recognition for contribution to the country like Pedro I who was known as Father of Independence along side several other people and Pedro II who was known as Father of the Nation. I heard Mexican politician fight wether the Cry of Dolores or Irtubide entering the city should be independence day when they could just declared both to be National day with the first for its significance in Mexican Revolution and the latter the actual independence, thats how much Mexican republican hated him. Even, Philipine recognize all three Jose Rizal, Aguinaldo and Bonifacio contribution to the country despite there were a hostile relationship between Aguinaldo and Bonifacio which i heard led to Bonifacio death.

@mohdghazali3473

4 жыл бұрын

I mean, Mexico has many National Hero with Hildago being the only one with the title Father of Independence for his famous "Cry of Dolores" which instigate the Mexican War of Independence, but Irtubide doesn't had any official recognition among them. One historion remark that Mexican owed its nationhood thanks to Irtubide. The tide of Mexican War of Independence start to changed to their favour when Irtubide join them, the current colour scheme of Mexican National Flag was based on Irtubide Three Guarante Army Flag, although Irtubide was not the first to used the Tenochtitlan symbol as the revolution symbol in a revolt against the Spanish in the end he is still the first to used it as a symbol of the entire New Spain the newly independence country immediatly after independence which to this day remain Mexican most important and recognizable symbol owed back to the time of the First Mexican Empire, the current Mexican National Anthem had history back to the Irtubide time and finally, the historion said Mexican owed its name to the First Mexican Empire by Irtubide as opposed to the name New Spain or United State of Mexico or New Spain. He had a huge legacy in Mexico. As a non-Mexican who learn history of American Continent, it is sad to see much of current Mexican younger generation don't even know him. He should be remembered alongside the National Hero. I am not asking to support monarchy, but just remembered the legacy of past leader who made contribution and had forge the country for what it look like today whatever his or her background. Sadly alot of people try to buried the contribution and questioned the character of the leader just because he was a "King" or "Emperor" or "Queen" or "Empress" like how communist Russia dissmissed the monarchial history.

I've never seen the story of the Republican Coup being told in a so truly way, even though it was short version it was so true

Not appearing in the chart: Pedro I married D. Leopoldina, a Habsburg, whose sister married Napoleon Bonaparte. That made Pedro I Napoleon’s brother in law, ironically, since it was Napoleon who made Portugal’s royal family migrate to Brazil in the first place when he invaded that country.

Fun fact: monarchism is far more popular in Brazil today than it was in 93, and back then we already got 15% of the votes. The monarchist movement is usually associated with right-wing movements and their presence on anti-left demonstrations is always noticeable. Watch any videos of right-wing demonstrations in Brazil and you'll always see multiple Imperial flags among the Republican flags. Considering today's political landscape in Brazil the ascension of the Imperial House isn't as crazy of a solution as it sounds.

@mojeo522

4 жыл бұрын

For me, its the best solution. Ave!

Unless someone put a gun on the head of Prince Pedro to force him to sign, his resignation was VALID. The only way to challenge this resignation is because the Brazilian constitution stated that such resignation had to be approved by Parliament which was impossible at that time, the monarchy having been already abolished. What is important to keep in mind is that in Law, you have the letter of the law and the spirit of the law. These are 2 different things. One is to obey the litteral wording of the law. The other is to obey the intent behind the law. In our siruation, the monarchy beeing abolished, it was impossible to obbey the letter of the law so does Pedro resignation at least obbey the intent of the law ? YES it did ! The intent behind the law requiring Parliament agreement was NOT to force someone to be Emperor if they want to resign ! The intent was to make sure the resignation was not forced by some political parties who prefered a prince over another one. The intent was to guarantee the monarchy would remain neutral, over the parties and their influence. It was to avoid a coup. Prince Pedro never said he was forced to sign. And he was not. He was a grown up man. He could have desobbey his mother. He would just have been a bit poorer. His resignation is absolutely VALID.

@igorakcio

4 жыл бұрын

No, it wasn't. If the anyone wants to resign his/her representative function, it is utterly necessary the Parliamentary approval. Every decision without this consent is necessarely null!

One of the Orleans family died recently of covid. Just don't remember who... And given the current state of affairs in Brazil, monarchy would not be a bad idea at all!

@FelipeCarreiro

3 жыл бұрын

Prince Dom Eudes, father of deputy Dom Luiz Philippe de Orleans and Bragança, recently died. But I don't know if the cause of death was Covid-19.

Wow. Your accent in João is perfect

Brazil’s desgrace begin when Emperor Pedro II was overthrown. I’m a monarchist, and my dream is to one day see the Brazilian Empire restored.

My name is João, thanks for pronouncing it correctly! :D

Ave, Império!

@riss-kunii5253

4 жыл бұрын

Amém

@guilhermebispo9

4 жыл бұрын

AVE GLÓRIA!!!

@bertrandd3813

4 жыл бұрын

Avá à merda

@Hiroheim

4 жыл бұрын

Ave

@Lucas-ei1ms

Жыл бұрын

Ave Império.

Great video as always!!!

Actually, D.Pedro ll didin't fought against the coup because he didin't want to see Brazilian blood spilled because of him.

Pedro II was a hero, one of the greatest brazilians of all time.

Si... Luiz

Considering that throughout the 20th century Brazil had 5 constitutions and, in 1993, Brazil was at the end of an almost 14 year period of recession and hyperinflation, it is not surprising that almost 14 percent of the population wanted the monarchy back.

Septim Dynasty Family Tree when?

Thanks for saying out loud that our glorious empire suffered a coup. Almost nobody here says it.

Brazilian monarchist here. Although Prince Pedro's resignation wasn't required by law, it is a tradition in the Bragança family and, since by the time of the resignation, Her Imperial Majesty Isabel (Princess Isabel) was by right the legitimate empress of Brazil, is was a condition imposed by the force of the head of the brazilian state and complied of free will . The enormous majority of brazilian monarchists today pledge allegiance to His Royal and Imperial Highness Prince Luiz de Orleans and Bragança. P.S.: I was astoshined by your pronunciation of "João". Congratulations!

i dont think Monarchy is more popular in Brazil than in Portugal, what you dont realize is the proportion with the number of population, a poll was made in Portugal and showed that more than 20% voted in favor of Monarchy, while in Brazil didnt even reached 14%

Our republic is a joke! Long live the Empire of Brazil! (Beijo na Dona Leopoldina e na Princesa Isabel!)

In answer to your question - If there was to be monarchy in Brazil, the King should be Prince Pedro Gastao of Orleans. Prince Pedro stayed in Petropolis (City of Peter) and lived right by the palace which is a museum now a days. He was always our prince/king. My generation and some of the young generations have known him before he passed away really well. He did act as a King. We would see him often through the streets in his beautiful horse. He would come to our schools, talk with everyone. He was someone who we always cared a lot for. His older son had stayed in Petropolis - not sure now. Prince Pedro Gastao lived in the Palacio Grao Para right behind my school. Great Memories!!!

There is a song about Pedro II. It is called Last Farewell from the group Armahda. You should check it out. It is english o/

Very impressive your pronunciation of João is correct. Never saw a Foreign speak it correct.

One day we will restore the Empire and make Brazil great again.

@passokita

4 жыл бұрын

Make Brazil Empire Again 👑👑👑👑👑👑

@allexandremoreira5544

4 жыл бұрын

Make South America Great Again

Perfect “João” pronunciation.

Currently, the two main claims to the brazilian throne are the Orleans and Bragança branch, from the offspring of the imperial princess Isabel and the count of Eu, and the Saxe-Coburg-Gotha and Bragança, from the offspring of the princess Leopoldina (which you didn't mention) with the prince Ludwig August of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha. This second line's claims originate from a special law that was passed so to make their children the heirs because it was thought that Isabel may have been sterile due to her difficulty to impregnate. Once she did, however, the already passed and approved law was just ignored, and since the republic was unrightfully established before the ruling emperor passed away, this was never brought up.

So Peter I (and IV) eventually managed to keep both kingdoms in the family. He was also very handsome. I saw a painting of him at the Palácio da Ajuda. It made me want to have his babies.

The only thing i would add to the video is mentioning the line until reach Luis Philippe de Orleans e Bragança, who is now a federal congressman in here. Besides that, NICE WORK!!!!! P.s. that pronounciantion of "João" sound like a brazilian. Perfect.

@luansagara

4 жыл бұрын

he is not in the succession line of the family, thus, mentioning him would be unnecessary. besides, he and a lot of people refer to him as prince when that is a lie

@danlourenco1

4 жыл бұрын

@@luansagara It is true, he is not. But i still think It would be interesting to people know that a member of the house of Bragança is in congress, even been out of succession line. Anyway, the video is already posted...

more videos about brazil we have great stories but it seems that others ignore us ❤

If you think about it, Pedro, the eldest son of Isabel, only renounced his rights to the throne because he loved and wanted to marry Elizabeth of Dobrzenicz, who, as you explained was not of a royal house. And he only met her and fell in love with her because he and his family were exiled in Europe, which allowed their paths to cross. If the monarchy in Brazil hadn't been overthrown, the imperial family would not have been exiled to Europe and Pedro would not have met Elizabeth, the woman who made he renounce his rights to the throne. Therefore, with Pedro remaining in Brazil, he would most probably marry a princess of a royal house, making his marriage valid and then suceeding his grandfather and mother as Emperor of Brazil. Because of this, his line, the line of Petrópolis, would most probably be the one ruling over Brazil today, not the line of Vassouras. Also, about the Referendum of 1993, it was actually 100 years too late. I cannot find the source right now, but from what I read, after the monarchy was dethrown, the new republican government promised to hold a referendum to decide whether Brazil would remain a republic or go back to being a monarchy, but this referendum was never held at the time. I belive the republican government thought that the memory of Pedro II was still very fresh and the people would vote in favor of the monarchy, so they didn't want to take that risk. I'll say this, if there was a monarch who didn't deserve his fate, it was Pedro II. I'm not saying this because I'm a monarchist, cause I'm not... at least not anymore...

The 1993 Brazilian referendum would not have restored the Bragancas to the throne, only restored monarchy as a form of government. As one Brazilian political reporter said at the time, "there's no reason we couldn't have an emperor Leonel (Brizola) i".

@amitystan

Жыл бұрын

So we would have basically a Napoleon as emperor? Who defitinely isn’t From the original family line?

@angel4everable

Жыл бұрын

@@amitystan Precisely. Anybody could have been chosen emperor of Brazil if the monarchist side had won, even an imported royal.

@user-kg2lp8jz2r

Жыл бұрын

@@amitystan we could have a vargas 2

i´d like to see my flag with the cross of soldiers of christ again,the republic brought to many problems

@darthsawlex8257

4 жыл бұрын

Republic is indeed a dirty word.

@TheMGIvideos

4 жыл бұрын

@@darthsawlex8257 lol