My book about everything you need to know about the Supreme Court is now available! Amazon: amzn.to/3Jj3ZnS Bookshop (a collection of indie publishers): bookshop.org/books/the-power-of-and-frustration-with-our-supreme-court-100-supreme-court-cases-you-should-know-about-with-mr-beat/9781684810680 Barnes and Noble: www.barnesandnoble.com/w/the-power-of-our-supreme-court-matt-beat/1142323504?ean=9781684810680 Amazon UK: www.amazon.co.uk/s?k=the+power+of+our+supreme+court&crid=3R59T7TQ6WKI3&sprefix=the+power+of+our+supreme+courth%2Caps%2C381&ref=nb_sb_noss Mango: mango.bz/books/the-power-of-our-supreme-court-by-matt-beat-2523-b Target: www.target.com/p/the-power-of-our-supreme-court-by-matt-beat-paperback/-/A-86273023 Walmart: www.walmart.com/ip/The-Power-of-Our-Supreme-Court-How-the-Supreme-Court-Cases-Shape-Democracy-Paperback-9781684810680/688487495 Chapters Indigo: www.chapters.indigo.ca/en-ca/books/the-power-of-our-supreme/9781684810680-item.html?ikwid=The+Power+of+Our+Supreme+Court&ikwsec=Home&ikwidx=0#algoliaQueryId=eab3e89ad34051a62471614d72966b7e

I was about to say "What convenient naming" but then I realized, the Miranda rights were named after him......

@iammrbeat

7 жыл бұрын

:D

@snowvixen1000

5 жыл бұрын

@@iammrbeat I don't know if you take request but I was wondering if you had a video on Gregg v Georgia

@ms.mojo_risin

4 жыл бұрын

simonster -909 - 😂

@charahahaundertale._.8837

4 жыл бұрын

simonster -909 hello

@yaboi7034

2 жыл бұрын

Oofff…

omg that ending

@josestarks8892

5 жыл бұрын

😢😢😢

Damn! A guy gets away with murdering Miranda by literally using the Miranda defense in court. That's messed up.

@Stormtrooper-oc4vn

4 жыл бұрын

That's why 4 justices were against it.

@readynowforever3676

4 жыл бұрын

You just violated his 6th Amendment Rights: The presumption of innocence. He was only suspected of the crime, not convicted of it.

@elijahfordsidioticvarietys8770

3 жыл бұрын

“There was no evidence that he did it”

@friedmanism2

3 жыл бұрын

The world is a cold and cruel place.

@thecurdy

3 жыл бұрын

It's an urban legend and not proven to be true

This video is much more better than the website. It make it clearer to understand!

@iammrbeat

6 жыл бұрын

Thank you! Which website are you referring to?

@pureroseangemuse7910

6 жыл бұрын

Mr. Beat mostly all, cuz they dont tell the rest of other details on miranda case, i guess watching a video is more descriptive than what i found online.

@hilman94

2 жыл бұрын

@@iammrbeat by the time you mention "brief" and the image of it appear, I know this video is worth watching 🤣🤣🤣

The purpose of the Miranda rights is to prevent what happened in Duxbury Massachusetts recently. A drunk man drowned in a pond and his son who called 911 to try to save him was arrested and charged with murder. They never read him his Miranda rights and grilled him for 6 hours without his lawyer present. He told his mother afterwards that he did not kill his Dad and that they made him tell the same story a hundred times over so finally he made up a story about exorcizing his father to get rid of a demon so that they would stop badgering him. Already the media ran with the story and it made headlines across the world. I saw an article in a French newspaper. All the articles fail to mention that his confession was the result of a 6 hour interrogation, they play it like that was the son's original response. What the police did amounts to torturing a kid traumatize by the death of his father.

@nasis18

10 ай бұрын

Terrible. What was the end result of the case?

@Bcrawlspace

10 ай бұрын

@@nasis18 The kid has been sitting in jail for the past two years awaiting trial. The arresting officer took the stand in a pre-trial hearing and stated that he didn't know what the Miranda rights meant, reading them to a prisoner is just part of the job he thought. The judge then threw out the kid's confession to the police. They are still moving forward with the trial which starts in December.

@nasis18

10 ай бұрын

@Bcrawlspace Jesus. How the hell did a cop not know what Miranda warnings were?! This is just so messed up. I always say we don't have a justice system. We have a legal system.

Dear Mr. Beat, You have a good style of explaining things. The information is not too dense, and you use a conversational tone. Bravo!

@iammrbeat

6 жыл бұрын

Thank you. That means a lot :D

Quite surprised that it was 5-4. This was a very important supreme court case.

@immaheadout4777

2 жыл бұрын

The Supreme Court just completely gutted the Miranda rights. Because now you can’t sue the police for denying you your 5th amendment rights.

@universalplayz7496

3 ай бұрын

I mean the 4 judges that dissented had a good cause as there reasoning is true in the part that this isn't stated in the constitution but it can also be argued that one needs to be told his rights when his life and liberty are at stake.

I like how Mr White and Mr. Black voted opposite ways and their names are opposites.

@Campeon99

3 жыл бұрын

lmaooo i just noticed

You deserve waaaay more attention on YT

Wait a minute, you can be found guilty if ONE person says you confessed to them.. isnt that.. a little dangerous

@Compucles

2 жыл бұрын

That does seem suspiciously close to hearsay. Although, I'm sure there was also some corroborating evidence that allowed the police to arrest him in the first place.

@Treblaine

Жыл бұрын

@@Compucles it literally is hearsay, but, confessions are one of the many exceptions to the hearsay rule. This is also why you should never talk to the police as the hearsay rule does apply to exculpatory statements so if you say "yeah I wanted to kill him but I have an alibi, I was at home sleeping in bed" the only thing the cop can repeat in court is the incriminating "I wanted to kill him"

@edwardromo7914

Жыл бұрын

The women who was raped was able to identify Miranda’s car and also testified in court.

Shawshank Redemption spoiler alert: The time setting is 1966. When police officers come to arrest guards at the Shawshank prison, the officer making the arrest reads the Miranda rights off a piece of paper. This is because of the fact that SCOTUS had just made a ruling on Miranda. V. Arizona, so the officer doesn't know the rights off by heart yet. Very good detail by the producers of Shawshank Redemption.

@vampiregamingyt8754

Жыл бұрын

A missed detail that the film industry doesn't meantion: the Miranda rights don't have to be read upon an arrest, just before an interrogation, and it doesn't imply to things you give up willingly without being asked about.

I love the format. Thank you

Thank you so much! This video helped so much for my S.S project on Miranda vs. Arizona. I understand everything now, Thank You :))))))))

Thank you for educating us in an entertaining and informative way, Mr. Beat

Bro I'm 18 years old and will be taking the Common Law Admissions Test(CLAT) in a few months. I can't wait to get to law school man. Thank you for making these fascinating and informative videos. Hope to be on the Supreme Court of India one day and adjudicate on matters like these.

@utoothheartyeight

2 жыл бұрын

Did you pick the "man" up from Biden. Quit it, you sound like you're 10 years old in the 1950s.

@izzatfatima442

Жыл бұрын

I have already filed case in Pakistan High Court to implement Miranda rights

thank you, just what I needed! I love how clearly how you stated everything. It made me understand better than reading.

Just found this. That was fabulous! You had me informed and laughing so hard. Thanks for that!🤣🤣🤣😁

thanks for this video, it really helped me get a good understanding of the case!

@iammrbeat

3 жыл бұрын

Glad it helped!

Wonderful video! Educational. And easy to understand.

GREAT! You make our homework easier! Blessings Mr. Beat.

@sayakah9014

3 жыл бұрын

Same!

Watching for an assignment and couldn’t stand the voice of the video the professor had us watching., so glad to find this one.

This case is far deeper, and has far more emplications than meets the eye. I had to do a 40 hour research paper on it. I went much further by taking to legal minds at various colleges etc. This is by far one of the deepest, widest, and most profound cases of the 1900"s To protect the innocent from cops. Daymond Chief Jones Police Accountability Expert On KZread 40 peace officer service,

@rugvedkulkarni1593

5 жыл бұрын

Could you link to that paper?

@megaaubrezzy

4 жыл бұрын

Yes please link the paper

@DCJNewsMedia

4 жыл бұрын

@@megaaubrezzy ..I don't have it anymore... that was in college back in 1990.....30 years ago... You can Google Maranda vs. Arizona en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miranda_v._Arizona There are case studies on this specific case.... In my opinion...in the last 20-30 years...many courts have tried to narrow down the meanings of the requirements...... CHIEF JONES

@PatrioticNurse948

3 жыл бұрын

Could you help clarify something for me regarding it? Maybe im wrong or misinformed but I heard if you request a lawyer, until you get your lawyer present with you, anything you say up until then is nullified? If that makes sense. Basically are there implications that nullify your confession besides _not_ being rrad your rights? Thanks

@DCJNewsMedia

3 жыл бұрын

@@PatrioticNurse948 ...yes and No... once you Involk your right to remain silent and ask for an attorney...... things are viewed as Duress if police hound you, or scare you into taking... However 🤠 they can claim you revoked your Rights and choose to talk.... Or you just quit talking and never asked for legal counsel..... Then their is a blurted statement called a reas justi..... not sure of spelling....it means you blurted out something that tends to incriminate you before they his chance to Marandize you.... they can use that against you.... In the end it's up to a judge to decide .... your mind set and beliefs and the intention of the Police..... It's a Maze..... just don't talk to police..... even skilled veteran attorneys mess up talking to police......... prison is full of them. Don't be the next mistake...... They are. Giving you legal notice that they believe you committed a crime.... and they are actively building a case against you.... and they are asking or demanding you help them build a case against yourself..... 5th amendment....right not to self incriminate.... Police can lie to get a confession.....case law. But if you lie it's a criminal charge..... you have no right to lie... just cops do. Thank you so very much for the questions

Thank you!

@iammrbeat

7 жыл бұрын

Thank YOU! :)

Great story after he got out of prison, priceless.

Thanks for this video it really helped me a lot for my presentation;P

@iammrbeat

3 жыл бұрын

Glad it helped!

Thanks for your video

This one is a certified Supreme Court classic

"I wish to remain silent." Kim Jong-un: *"You mean forever?"*

@Brightness_Radiant

3 жыл бұрын

😂😭

Can you do Marbury v. Madison please... Your videos make them much easier to understand... Thank you

@iammrbeat

6 жыл бұрын

I actually already made a video about that case, back in the day. kzread.info/dash/bejne/n2WKo8-QqNOymrg.html However, I do plan on redoing it some time over the next several months. Thanks for the kind words!

3:00am upload. someone had a long night editing.

@iammrbeat

7 жыл бұрын

I actually uploaded it a few days ago- I scheduled this one. I try to get them all out early on Friday mornings now.

@RanochVTX

5 жыл бұрын

@@iammrbeat God Dang it Bobby, he was making it look like you work hard.

well done :D only 5 year served for the 2nd trial O_O

@iammrbeat

7 жыл бұрын

Thank you! Yeah, that's a little crazy, and even crazier how he died.

Wait, so "You have the right to remain silent" isn't just fancy police talk for "be quiet?"

@cpi3267

2 жыл бұрын

well... yeah, but cops WANT you to talk

This video needs a grim update in light of the recent sc ruling.

Man I love Columbo. What an amazing show

Lo these help me so much in school

It should be required that all people being interrogated have a lawyer present. And law enforcement can’t fabricate any details in a case

I subscribed because of this video 👍

I’m not going to tell you I have subscribed this channel as I have right to remain silent...

Cops: Do you know why I pulled you over? Me: *flashes my miranda card like morty with his adventure card*

There you go. I learnt something new today.

LOVE IT!!!

that sorry dude made me laugh our loud

Wait, isn't that double jeopardy, where you aren't supposed to be tried twice for the same crime? Or does that only come into play when found not guilty. Also do Americans under 18 have Miranda rights?

@iammrbeat

6 жыл бұрын

Americans under 18 have the Miranda rights yes. And this is an exception to double jeopardy due to different evidence.

@dontworry1302

6 жыл бұрын

Mr. Beat The exception isn't due to different evidence, when the Supreme Court through out the original case, it would legally be declared a mistrial. A mistrial can be retried again until a conclusive verdict is found.

@Drakrath

6 жыл бұрын

Mr. Beat and Bernie Sanders thanks for explaining

Good video.

The last time I heard the Miranda Warning used in a movie or TV show, it was bone-chilling, and it was stranger things.

Watching this for school.

We were actually made to recite the Miranda right in school… lol wasn’t difficult since I had had to previously learned the preamble to the constitution from memory.

The right to an attorney is also in the fifth amendment.

does anyone know the interest groups that were in favor and against miranda v. arizona?

The ending. They need to teach that stuff in school

Nice, man.

Very interesting

Did those police officers learn their law from a Snapple cap? Even when arrested he is at BEST a suspect, "innocent till proven guilty", yadda yadda yadda... He is NOT a criminal by definition, until he can be demonstrated "beyond reasonable doubt" to have been guilty of such a crime.

Chief Justice: Earl Warren President During this time: Lyndon B. Johnson Argued February 28 - March 1, 1966 Decided June 13, 1966 Case Duration: 105 days Decision: 5-4 in favor of Miranda (Warren, Brennan Jr., Douglas, Fortas, Black. Clark, Stewart, White, Harlan for Arizona)

@danielnunez1587

2 жыл бұрын

6-3 gutted Miranda

@ashtoncollins868

2 жыл бұрын

@@danielnunez1587 look at the end of the vid it’s 5-4

@danielnunez1587

2 жыл бұрын

@@ashtoncollins868 im referencing the supreme courts recent ruling

@ashtoncollins868

2 жыл бұрын

@@danielnunez1587 wait what did they overturn this or something

@danielnunez1587

2 жыл бұрын

@@ashtoncollins868 it's a lot to explain over a comment section just google their recent rulings

Mr Beat You should do presidential nominees songs like John Mcain and Mitt Romney that lost

@iammrbeat

7 жыл бұрын

+Mummy Neo My friend @theworshahts already does actually!

Such a twist

Wouldn’t the second trial be unconstitutional as that would be considered double jeopardy, considering he was found innocent at the Supreme Court?

@TheTimoprimo

6 жыл бұрын

No. The Supreme Court just advises the lower courts with their decisions. The lower courts can either choose to start a new trial or to release the person.

@shirtless6934

3 жыл бұрын

The defendant is deemed to waive the Double Jeopardy defense by taking the appeal.

Fun fact: Ernesto Miranda after he was released in prison, Miranda was killed in a bar fight and the killer invoked his Miranda rights and refused to talk to police

Subbed.

I mean, on the one hand I get the "if you don't know your own rights, then welp" argument. On the other hand, the logical conclusion to that is something like "the government can censor you unless you are aware and actively assert that they can't" which, yeah, no.

You just added the last part didn’t you?

why were the rights named after him

Would his second trial be considered double jeopardy?

@edwardromo7914

Жыл бұрын

No. Double jeopardy applies when you’re found not guilty and then charged for the same conduct in the same jurisdiction. In Miranda’s case, he was found guilty, a higher court determined their was evidence the jury shouldn’t have heard, so he was tried again without that evidence.

When r u gonna upload the next video?

@iammrbeat

7 жыл бұрын

+anish sharma Next Friday. I have a song planned for then, and the next SCB episode will be out the following Friday.

That’s an ironic ending

wait how is that not double jeopardy?

how did they repeat the trial? doesn't that go under double jeopardy or not?

@raymondluxuryacht86

5 жыл бұрын

Retrying a case because the original conviction was thrown out isn't considered double jeopardy. It's basically considered a do-over because the first trial was deemed invalid. Double jeopardy would only apply if Miranda had been acquitted but then the authorities arrested and tried him again on the same charges.

Mr. Beat, you do a disservice to the Phoenix Police Department. There is no evidence that they pressured, coerced, or otherwise mistreated Ernest Miranda. As the Supreme Court of Arizona observed,“[t]he voluntariness and the truth of the confession were not denied. However, the defendant did not have an attorney at the time he made the confession. The sole question before the court, then, is whether there was a violation of the rights of defendant under the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments to the Constitution by the admission of the voluntary statement made without an attorney.” State v. Miranda, 98 Ariz. 18, 30, 401 P.2d 721, 729 (1965), rev’d, 384 U.S. 436 (1966). Miranda’s case was one of several decided at the same time. There may have been improper police conduct in other cases, but there was none in the Arizona case. If you have any evidence there was, please cite it.

Went to pay my respects to Ole Waylon at the City of Mesa Cemetery and discovered Mr Miranda is buried there in the same graveyard.

are his miranda rights in jeopardy?

4:41 ….(starts to sing)…."And isn't ironic? Don't you think?.... IT'S LIKE RAIIIINNN ON A SUNSHINE DAY!...

Jan 31st 1976 what a good day

Do Padilla vs Kentucky

Odd that this right which has no basis in any British rights is now part of UK law, and that of many other nations.

WHAT AN ENDING!!!!

Did you hear that the Miranda Rights may be taken away soon?

@noahhanselman7713

2 жыл бұрын

@AJ Shaw What about the SCOTUS ruling recently?

You have the right to... what the hell is that?! I

What is the name of that movie?

@OpinionesDeJACCsOpinions

5 жыл бұрын

It's a TV show called “Columbo”.

The ending be like 😱

Explained well... I like ..I like...

He sounds like Alex Clark

How were they allowed to try him again? Constitution says no double jeopardy???

@TheSSUltimateGoku

5 жыл бұрын

+allyourcode Because he was never found not guilty in the first trial. The conviction was thrown out. However that doesn’t mean that they couldn’t try him again it’s just mean they couldn’t use his confession in the second trial as evidence to find him guilty this time which obviously they didn’t need.

Attorney up always. Tell the police have a good day and remain Silent. Always Attorney up

In Arizona they don’t even read u your rights any more I’ve been to jail 3 times this year for no injured party. Contact me if you want to sue the city for free city money .

@mikerizos510

11 ай бұрын

Contrary to the popular belief, they don't have to inform you of your rights during arrest, only before questioning which can be several hours or days later, if ever. Movies and TV perpetuate the myth.

Never forget that anything you say CAN and WILL be used AGAINST you. It says nothing about what you say being used in your defense. Nothing you say, even the truth, is to your benefit.

So the guy that killed Miranda got read his Miranda rights? Thats wholarious!

The guy that murdered Miranda was mirandized after being placed under arrest interesting.

This should also be done for patients rights.

If I was a Supreme Court justice, I would have sided with Arizona.

@JMWall

5 жыл бұрын

may I ask why?

not sayin he didnt do it but wouldnt what the room mate said be consiterd hare say and not be viablue in the case

While not being the most controversial, this probably is the decision least grounded in reality of the Warren Court and Waren Court-decapitated eras.

they didn't need illegal evidence or a confession. they had massive other evidence like the victim's testimony, DNA, lack of alibi, their previous relationship, lack of other suspects, behavior relating to the crime

@johnkerry6312

3 жыл бұрын

even if he pled guilty to the charges his guilt was beyond a reasonable doubt.

@johnkerry6312

3 жыл бұрын

his confession to the other person counts as the last one

@johnkerry6312

3 жыл бұрын

if you don't give an answer to a question under cross examination while picking and choosing, a jury can use that as evidence of guilt. only if you don't speak at all can they not.

58 years ago today

Just to be clear: Is there any chance that Ernesto Miranda was innocent?

@ebrown7782

2 жыл бұрын

No

You should know your rights. I don't understand why you should need someone to tell you.

@bobbyferg9173

6 жыл бұрын

Well some people might not have been informed about them. Sure we are trying to make sure that students and immigrants can know their rights as soon as possible but their is always a chance someone never heard them or simply forgot them.

@sophiefrancis8295

5 жыл бұрын

Some people here aren't American and just wanted to know about the case after watching Elementary.

@AmazeGames

2 жыл бұрын

awful take

“You have the right to remain silent. Anything you say can and will be used against you in a court of law. You have the right to the presence of an attorney before any questioning. If you cannot afford an attorney, one will be appointed to you with no cost. “

This is what Officers would tell suspects, and most of the 5th Amendment is about the right to a fair trial ANYWAY.... "You have the right to remain silent. Anything you say can be used against you in court. You have the right to talk to a lawyer for advice before we ask you any questions. You have the right to have a lawyer with you during questioning. If you cannot afford a lawyer, one will be appointed for you before any questioning if you wish. If you decide to answer questions now without a lawyer present, you have the right to stop answering at any time."

And so it should be hard, if the state wants to deprive you of your freedom then they must have the highest burden of proof, JUSTICE BABY

Yay?