Spoiler alert: NO ANSWER GIVEN

@OzanErenBilgen

2 ай бұрын

I hate those spam videos

@peterresetz1960

2 ай бұрын

Electrons gain energy by absorbing photons, and lose energy by emitting photons. It was explained near the end of the video.

@RvVx7

2 ай бұрын

​@@peterresetz1960photon a uniform wave which traverse uniformly in every direction without any spin or Eddy. Electron an involuted spinning wave which collapses uniformly in every direction on a higher dimension than the 3rd , like a screw but its point is infinitely sharp that crosses the 3rd dimension to the 4rth or 5th one.

@alialias3913

2 ай бұрын

Theoretical science is plain subjective waffle

@mohitgupta6451

Ай бұрын

Go to the chat gpt or other ai tools. Theses kind of videos will not be able to give you an answer

In other words, they dont know.

@user-im2nv9tj7q

4 ай бұрын

A vave?

@ronjon7942

4 ай бұрын

Maybe it’s like trying to explain something so fundamental, it’s a property. “Why’s water wet?” so to speak. It’s used to describe other things’ whys. Or something. Tf, I don’t know.

@sermodur

4 ай бұрын

The title of this video is wrong , is not everlasting energy. Electron have energy when they move

@Play4Vida

3 ай бұрын

From movement. the nucleus has a positive proton that makes the negative electron circulate. But there are billions of them circulation. This circulation creates a magnetic field that creates energy. Now, the amount of energy generated will depend on the elements surrounding the atoms. The chemical component. This how our brain creates electricity and uses our nerve system to control movement and the use of our senses. It uses water as a conductor. Our organs are made of water that helps the electrons move. Also, this is how electricity is made. The source is a battery that has positive protons on one end and negative electrons on the other.. The best conductor is copper or steel. Because of the properties of steel the electrons qre more loss, they get so loss they start moving at the speed of light creating a magnetic field and heat and thus creating electricity through speed of those electrons. The chemicals in our brain and chemical compound in the battery determines how much amps it can create.

@bradenpryor7442

3 ай бұрын

⁠​⁠@@ronjon7942what is “wet”. That’s just a human word to describe how something feels to our human senses. It’s deeper. I’m sure you know energy cannot be created or destroyed, so, an electron has to get its energy from something. Where does that something get its energy from since it can’t be created. Where does that something’s something get its energy from, etc. Will it lead to finite proof of god or will we just keep falling down an endless rabbit hole from one scientific discovery to the next? Who knows

Funny thing about quantum mechanics is that it's similar to abstract art paintings. Everyone pretends to understand it...

@Hank520Tube

7 ай бұрын

One might ask: do we really understand anything of the sub-atomic world. Still the challenge was, is, to come up with a theory that explains what is observed and/or measured. The "Bohr theory" of the atom does explain some things but not all, so Quantum Mechanics was developed to answer some questions as posed in this video such as why the electron doesn't lose energy as it orbits around the nucleus, as in the Bohr model.

@pelasgeuspelasgeus4634

7 ай бұрын

@@Hank520Tube how do we know that electron doesn't lose energy?

@alexjames6747

5 ай бұрын

Particles do not exist. The Bohr model does not explain the orbit. Orbits are energy levels. They are waves. Everything is waves. The entire Universe is filled with waves.@@Hank520Tube

@alexjames6747

5 ай бұрын

Electron doesn't lose its energy. Electron IS energy.@@pelasgeuspelasgeus4634

@RapidBlindfolds

3 ай бұрын

I’m an artist working on a series of paintings about biochemistry and I love this analogy. I was thinking that all the proposed atomic models throughout the ages reminded me of the revolutions of seeing in art, ie linear perspective, Impressionism, cubism etc

“Definitely not an orbit” *perpetually depicts orbit models*

@Greenmachine305

5 ай бұрын

I thought so too. I hate the particle model. Still, it is easier for people to visualize than the fluctuating foam of field excitation probabilities.

Electron walks into a bar and starts critisizing everything: the bar is filthy....the beer is flat...the waitress is ugly. Bartender says: Why are you so negative?

@_Mentat

7 ай бұрын

A bartender says: get out, we don't serve small particles in here. A neutrino walks into a bar.

@viralsheddingzombie5324

7 ай бұрын

As the bartender, I would also ask "where did you get those legs?"

@Divide_et_lmpera

4 ай бұрын

LOL 😂

@andylane3739

3 ай бұрын

between zero & infinity is where the energy comes from. between existence & non-existence

@KpxUrz5745

Ай бұрын

Ok, so is there a punchline? When does the joke get funny?

I think we know far, far more about outer space than we ever will understand about "inner space".

@SuperUAP

8 ай бұрын

I think it was the Egyptians that believed that when you sleep at night you actually go into the underworld or the Land of the dead

@pangeaproxima3681

4 ай бұрын

@@SuperUAP what does it have to do with the subject?

@joebloggs396

4 ай бұрын

Quantum theory has the most accurate mathematics to reality. While we don't fully understand dark matter and dark energy which makes up most of the universe.

@positivevibetec

4 ай бұрын

Ever is a very long time.

Amazing that a few people figured this out over a hundred years ago. The rest of us today are left scratching our heads at an algebra problem.

@ronjon7942

4 ай бұрын

Algebra? In high school and college, I’ve had a lot of calculus my career choices didn’t make me use. I can’t even add now without a calculator - although I was pretty good at math and physics, but pretty bad at arithmetic.

This video doesn’t answer the question it asks.

@nixl3518

4 ай бұрын

Also, what is a “vave”?

@MrBigdaddy2ya

3 ай бұрын

Because science won't accept that a creator commands particles behavior

@nixl3518

3 ай бұрын

@@MrBigdaddy2ya LOL!!! BS2ya!!

@MrBigdaddy2ya

3 ай бұрын

@@nixl3518 so when you see a car driving down the road do you say that car made itself. When you see a Farris wheel at a carnival do you say that Farris wheel spontaneously appear out of nothing. When you see the painting Mona Lisa do you say that happened naturally. No I think not, yet when you see a much more complex structure like a sun or a galaxy or a human body or a animal or a tree or a electron you say that amazing structure made itself without a command or blueprint. You should lol at you irrational beliefs and not my ration belief that everything with order and define form and function is likely a design by a higher intelligent being.

@nixl3518

3 ай бұрын

@@MrBigdaddy2ya so funny how your brain tricks you! I didn't write anything but "LOL" yet you were triggered enough to write all this BS! Quite entertaining!! Anyway, your English is impressive but you missed a couple of spots. What are you trying to say, what is your philosophy? Are you saying that because somebody made the car then obviously "somebody" made the Universe? Did you ever study Logic? There is a distinct difference in that we know who made the car, the Ferris wheel and even the "Mona Lisa"! Where exactly is the similar evidence for the Universe? Let me know what your evidence is.

I would have loved if they teached us the theory in this detail in our schools rather than just giving us formulas and doing random calculations for exams

Electrons get their energy from drinking RedBull, it gives them wings.

@0NeverEver

3 ай бұрын

No No, the electrone looses Infinite Energy by math tricks done by physicists WHO have drunk to much Energy 😂

@Shimon087

Күн бұрын

😂😂😂😂😂

Thank you for explaining from where do electrons get their everlasting energy. Based on the sofisticated explanation seems like actually nobody knows from where !

@user-dialectic-scietist1

7 ай бұрын

From the wear of other atoms! Wear is everywhere around you. That is why we are doing back-ups, because sometime the damage will happens. We know that from experience, but the process is a law of nature!

@bigscientificquestions

7 ай бұрын

Thank you so much 😊

@81giorikas

7 ай бұрын

@@bigscientificquestions Can't really claim it is elementary man...

@Play4Vida

3 ай бұрын

From movement. the nucleus has a positive proton that makes the negative electron circulate. But there are billions of them circulation. This circulation creates a magnetic field that creates energy. Now, the amount of energy generated will depend on the elements surrounding the atoms. The chemical component. This how our brain creates electricity and uses our nerve system to control movement and the use of our senses. It uses water as a conductor. Our organs are made of water that helps the electrons move. Also, this is how electricity is made. The source is a battery that has positive protons on one end and negative electrons on the other.. The best conductor is copper or steel. Because of the properties of steel the electrons qre more loss, they get so loss they start moving at the speed of light creating a magnetic field and heat and thus creating electricity through speed of those electrons. The chemicals in our brain and chemical compound in the battery determines how much amps it can create. Also take into account we eat salts, sugars, and other elements but serve perfectly for a chemical reaction to facilitate the movement 9f electrons in us.

IF you can answer the title question correctly, you can go collect your Nobel prize.

@Play4Vida

3 ай бұрын

From movement, friction. the nucleus has a positive proton that makes the negative electron circulate, proton attracts the electron. Like Earth gravitational core attracting the moon. But there are billions of them circulation. This circulation creates a magnetic field that creates energy, it's basically heat that combusts into useful energy. Now, the amount of energy generated will depend on the elements surrounding the atoms. The chemical components. This how our brain creates electricity and uses our nerve system to control movement and the use of our senses. It uses water as a conductor. Our organs are made of water that helps the electrons move. Also, this is how electricity is made. The source is a battery that has positive protons on one end and negative electrons on the other.. The best conductor is copper or steel. Because of the properties of steel the electrons are more loss, they get so loss they start moving at the speed of light creating a magnetic field and heat and thus creating electricity through friction of electrons. The chemicals in our brain and chemical compound in the battery determines how much amps it can create. Also, take into account we eat salts, sugars, and other elements which serves perfectly for a chemical reaction to facilitate the movement of electrons in us. The chemical reaction administer three things, the amount of energy, the type of energy and the amount of pressure to send the energy. Such a complex system but it's thanks to our planet. The melted core spinning in the center of our planet creates a magnetic field around our planet. I like to think we are electrical meat beings because of our magnetic planet. PS. I think the video is a waste of time. The information is well known. It's like they didn't research nor cared to actually study it.

Very nice video and review. Reminded me of why I like physics & chemistry, had flashbacks to learning about orbitals & electron shells over 50 years ago. Should've mentioned electron state jumping from shell to shell though. And you really didn't explain where the energy comes from, which was the title that drew my attention.

@JG27Korny

7 ай бұрын

No energy is required because there is no movement, electrons just happen to exist in a cloud of probabilities. Energy is exchanged when there is a change of the states. From there I understand the word quantum comes from, as those changes are discrete and measurable. I asked the AI of Google to watch the video and its answer was that the video at the end does not answer clearly the question, but finds my explanation good enough but it adds the following for clarity. 'The answer to the question "Where do electrons get their everlasting energy?" is that they don't require continuous energy because they aren't in a constant state of motion. Their energy is stored in their probabilistic distribution, and they only exchange energy when they transition between different states. This quantized energy exchange is what allows atoms to maintain their stable structure and form the building blocks of matter. The concept of electrons being in a cloud of probabilities, rather than a fixed orbit, is central to quantum mechanics. This means that electrons don't require continuous energy to maintain their position, as they aren't constantly moving around the nucleus. Instead, they exist in a superposition of states, where they have a possibility of being at any point within their orbital. When an electron absorbs or emits energy, it transitions between these probabilistic states, causing a corresponding change in its energy level. This energy exchange is quantized, meaning it occurs in discrete steps rather than a continuous flow. This quantization is a key characteristic of quantum mechanics and is responsible for the stability of atoms. '

Nobody knows from where electrons get their energy. But the particle physicists definitely are clueless 😂😂😂

@Play4Vida

3 ай бұрын

From movement, friction. the nucleus has a positive proton that makes the negative electron circulate, proton attracts the electron. Like Earth gravitational core attracting the moon. But there are billions of them circulation. This circulation creates a magnetic field that creates energy, it's basically heat that combusts into useful energy. Now, the amount of energy generated will depend on the elements surrounding the atoms. The chemical components. This how our brain creates electricity and uses our nerve system to control movement and the use of our senses. It uses water as a conductor. Our organs are made of water that helps the electrons move. Also, this is how electricity is made. The source is a battery that has positive protons on one end and negative electrons on the other.. The best conductor is copper or steel. Because of the properties of steel the electrons are more loss, they get so loss they start moving at the speed of light creating a magnetic field and heat and thus creating electricity through friction of electrons. The chemicals in our brain and chemical compound in the battery determines how much amps it can create. Also, take into account we eat salts, sugars, and other elements which serves perfectly for a chemical reaction to facilitate the movement of electrons in us. The chemical reaction administer three things, the amount of energy, the type of energy and the amount of pressure to send the energy. Such a complex system but it's thanks to our planet. The melted core spinning in the center of our planet creates a magnetic field around our planet. I like to think we are electrical meat beings because of our magnetic planet.

You did not answer your own question, where do electrons get their everlasting energy. Supposedly all elementary particles get their mass from the Higgs field, maybe it provides energy also? Just asking!

@paulthomas963

4 ай бұрын

The quantum field does all those things already. Higgs is a super dumb theory.

@Play4Vida

3 ай бұрын

From movement. the nucleus has a positive proton that makes the negative electron circulate. But there are billions of them circulation. This circulation creates a magnetic field that creates energy. Now, the amount of energy generated will depend on the elements surrounding the atoms. The chemical component. This how our brain creates electricity and uses our nerve system to control movement and the use of our senses. It uses water as a conductor. Our organs are made of water that helps the electrons move. Also, this is how electricity is made. The source is a battery that has positive protons on one end and negative electrons on the other.. The best conductor is copper or steel. Because of the properties of steel the electrons qre more loss, they get so loss they start moving at the speed of light creating a magnetic field and heat and thus creating electricity through speed of those electrons. The chemicals in our brain and chemical compound in the battery determines how much amps it can create. Also take into account we eat salts, sugars, and other elements but serve perfectly for a chemical reaction to facilitate the movement 9f electrons in us.

It appears that the thing that has saved Quantum Mechanics is its incredible prediction accuracy, which has been used in practical engineering. Its inability to “make sense” has been long forgiven and forgotten, except by die hard academics still searching for “meaning”.

@Greenmachine305

5 ай бұрын

Very astute.

@paulthomas963

4 ай бұрын

There are about 30 different ways they could explain it with the same math but modern society has chosen the "the moon isn't there when you're not looking" version, because Clown World.

Hmmm. I'm still not getting this. Unless electrons are either static "somethings", or travel unimpeded in a straight line, it seems to me that they still have some sort of limitless energy. Somehow I'm still missing something in this explanation.

@user-dialectic-scietist1

7 ай бұрын

Read my explanation, because till now there isn't any explanation on this basic question. Only a quantum physicist fond of the quantum field theory could say that the supply is coming from the field. But this is without any proof, just an abstractive theory!

@dalenvermeulen2836

7 ай бұрын

I'm no expert, but it sounds to me like electrons are just energt states of the nucleus and are bound to it by the charge... So it gets its energy from the nucleus, but decays by emitting it, thus when the nucleus loses energy, it decays, loses the electron, the electron is absorbed by another, gets charged, decays, energy shifts... It's just energy states of the nucleus...and it shares energy(electon) by decay and vica verca. So the outer shell energy wants to be in the nulceus, and to do so he needs to lose energy, but the atom wants to have all he's electrons, to become stable... So this video just blew my mind... And makes me question what the hell is this natural interface between the quantum world and our visual reality.... Like, it's all just energy but we se matter, but damn, makes me realize how much more there is to know and realize ans visualize.. We're lucky. Merry Christmas, to whom it may concern

@user-dialectic-scietist1

7 ай бұрын

@@dalenvermeulen2836 Merry Christmas! Your thought about the decay is excellent! Now think about that you see continuously in nature. The decay of some give life to others. Atoms aren't isolated, they are gathered in collections with other atoms of the same staff, even some of them are more radioactive of others. So, the produced by their decay, the energy needed to the others to exist. For that reason, if you left an isolated mass of a gathering of atoms in let say isolated environment as possible, then after time you will realize that the collection has lost an amount of its mass. Also, energy can't be only the source of the material. Because it is also a property of it. A property of something can't be responsible for its existence. So, the material is everything. It is mass, energy, field, charge, polarity, space, time it is everything. And material has its main function, which is the unstopped motion and change. Furthermore, every property of the material is a creation of its inner motion!

@user-dialectic-scietist1

7 ай бұрын

They gather energy from the decay of other atoms. This process we call it wear not with loss, but we have transformation and then a progress or change to something else. This process drives the transformation of life into death, which give birth and life to others! That is the cycle in nature! See the plants. They take the necessary from the soil and the animals take the necessary from the decay of the plants. Then the animals are dying and fertilized the soil! And so on!

@PhysiKarlz

7 ай бұрын

​@@dalenvermeulen2836 That is incorrect. If electrons are just the energy states of the nucleus, they would be a part of the nucleus, not in an electron cloud AROUND the nucleus which takes different forms due to the energy states of the electron. Additionally, the nucleus can have different energy states to those of the electrons. These are called nuclear energy states.

If she said how the energy doesn't deplete I completely missed it

@Greenmachine305

5 ай бұрын

She actually described how the original question is meaningless. It was click bait, and it worked.

Did not provide the answer for "WHERE..." electrons get their perpetual energy.

@johnstephenalbert

4 ай бұрын

That doesn't matter, you watched the video to the end, so it got monetized.

@sermodur

4 ай бұрын

Not perpetual energy, thats wrong, they get energy when they move

@davidfranklin1885

4 ай бұрын

@@johnstephenalbert "Some Thing from Nothing never yet was born." Epicurus

@dieselscience

4 ай бұрын

It never stops moving when orbiting. It never stops spinning. It takes zero time to change orbitals. It never decays... pretty damn perpetual. @@sermodur

@sermodur

4 ай бұрын

@@dieselscienceIs it his energy what causes that??

Thank you for the effort of creating this video! You chose very beautiful images and was very careful to explain the electron properties. I believe you have a lot of potential for possible improvements in your future videos. Firstly, I would dedicate more attention to a proper ending or conclusion to the videos. The ending here was pretty much abrupt. You do not necessarily have to follow the formula "subscribe, thanks for watching, etc", but you might think about the art of story telling. You are trying to tell a story, an arch which has an introduction, a question or problem being answered, and at the end a conclusion. Some other channels might give you good ideas on how to do so. I think your English pronunciation is pretty good. I am also a non-native speaker, I am from Brazil. I would just work on the pronunciation of some words which begin with "w", which were being pronounced as if it was German, with a "v" sound... It took me some time to understand some words and that you were trying to make an analogy with falling into a "well". Keep it up! I wish you all the best for your channel.

@anotherclearchannel

7 ай бұрын

Wow! You, sir, are amazing! Not only was your critique on point and succinct, but it also demonstrated a level of empathy and grace I rarely find in contemporary life (let alone online). So for this, I now say Thank You! And to the creator of this piece, I also extend my Thanks and appreciation.

@davi.poiani

7 ай бұрын

@@anotherclearchannel Hello there, thanks for the nice words! To be honest, not such a great deal. But I understand your point: it is like when someone is in the desert and water becomes precious, although it should be something normal, more present and abundant. Well, let us do our share, even if it is a tiny drop of water. Nowadays it seems that people have two neurons (one for and the other one against). So either they love or they hate. But the world is much more complex than that. And we are always learning and improving. Because you also noticed the talent of the girl you would have done the same. Treat her with the same respect you would have for a little sister for example. Having said that, we should also recognize that not always will be possible to be kind in life. Truth is more important, truth is above kindness in a hierarchy of values. Either because of our inherent flaws or because some situations might demand tools like irony, self defense, and even a little offence (as long as it is in the right measure)... not always sweet words will do the job. A person may have to listen to bitter words to wake up in a certain situation. That is a very difficult art, pretty difficult to find the right tone. Anyways, thanks for the reply, I took the opportunity to practice my English a little bit! Kinda rusty, had to look up some words.

@pinballrobbie

7 ай бұрын

Your English is well above average even for English people.@@davi.poiani

@Russsssss

7 ай бұрын

Get a life

At their own tiny gas stations

@egoideam

Жыл бұрын

I think Musk should send you to Mars, you could be very useful there.

@virtualworldsbyloff

Жыл бұрын

@@egoideam Denial is a bitch, but you better realize this scammer game sooner than later, you can tank me, sooner or later, Elon SIMP :)

@antogehtdichnixan6001

9 ай бұрын

Which is photons. Just look up the photoelectric effect

@user-hy9nh4yk3p

8 ай бұрын

Excellent. That needs a positive 'ping'. A minute joke - with a large laugh. Fare thee well.

Everything has a vabration as long the temperature is over absolute zero... It might take up energy from the surroundings

The nucleus imparts a wave function energy onto the electrons, giving them a probability cloud around the nucleus. In free space electrons lack this energy imparted from the nucleus and only has it's spin up or down energy and behaves as a point particle.

This sounds like every energy that the electron looses in the lowest energy level is directed directly back to itself. That could happen if space is bent inwards in all directions toward it. This is in a sense expected, as without the trick of renormalisation the electrin should have infnite energy and hence create a singularity. The question is: why would such a singularity/black hole only affect the electron and nothing else around it?

If we name a rule then we can pretend to understand it with no freaking idea what enforces that rule, or where that rule came from. We just say, "Because that's Bob's Rule!!".

@tyranmcgrath6871

7 ай бұрын

I don't like physics questions answered with "because of x's rule." either. But, I'm sure the rule wouldn't be a rule without rigorous tests.

Conservation of Spatial Curvature (both Matter and Energy described as "Quanta" of Spatial Curvature) Is there an alternative interpretation of "Asymptotic Freedom"? What if Quarks are actually made up of twisted tubes which become physically entangled with two other twisted tubes to produce a proton? Instead of the Strong Force being mediated by the constant exchange of gluons, it would be mediated by the physical entanglement of these twisted tubes. When only two twisted tubules are entangled, a meson is produced which is unstable and rapidly unwinds (decays) into something else. A proton would be analogous to three twisted rubber bands becoming entangled and the "Quarks" would be the places where the tubes are tangled together. The behavior would be the same as rubber balls (representing the Quarks) connected with twisted rubber bands being separated from each other or placed closer together producing the exact same phenomenon as "Asymptotic Freedom" in protons and neutrons. The force would become greater as the balls are separated, but the force would become less if the balls were placed closer together. Therefore, the gluon is a synthetic particle (zero mass, zero charge) invented to explain the Strong Force. An artificial Christmas tree can hold the ornaments in place, but it is not a real tree. String Theory was not a waste of time, because Geometry is the key to Math and Physics. However, can we describe Standard Model interactions using only one extra spatial dimension? What did some of the old clockmakers use to store the energy to power the clock? Was it a string or was it a spring? What if we describe subatomic particles as spatial curvature, instead of trying to describe General Relativity as being mediated by particles? Fixing the Standard Model with more particles is like trying to mend a torn fishing net with small rubber balls, instead of a piece of twisted twine. Quantum Entangled Twisted Tubules: “We are all agreed that your theory is crazy. The question which divides us is whether it is crazy enough to have a chance of being correct.” Neils Bohr (lecture on a theory of elementary particles given by Wolfgang Pauli in New York, c. 1957-8, in Scientific American vol. 199, no. 3, 1958) The following is meant to be a generalized framework for an extension of Kaluza-Klein Theory. Does it agree with the “Twistor Theory” of Roger Penrose, and the work of Eric Weinstein on “Geometric Unity”? During the early history of mankind, the twisting of fibers was used to produce thread, and this thread was used to produce fabrics. The twist of the thread is locked up within these fabrics. Is matter made up of twisted 3D-4D structures which store spatial curvature that we describe as “particles"? Are the twist cycles the "quanta" of Quantum Mechanics? When we draw a sine wave on a blackboard, we are representing spatial curvature. Does a photon transfer spatial curvature from one location to another? Wrap a piece of wire around a pencil and it can produce a 3D coil of wire, much like a spring. When viewed from the side it can look like a two-dimensional sine wave. You could coil the wire with either a right-hand twist, or with a left-hand twist. Could Planck's Constant be proportional to the twist cycles. A photon with a higher frequency has more energy. ( E=hf, More spatial curvature as the frequency increases = more Energy ). What if gluons are actually made up of these twisted tubes which become entangled with other tubes to produce quarks. (In the same way twisted electrical extension cords can become entangled.) Therefore, the gluons are a part of the quarks. Quarks cannot exist without gluons, and vice-versa. Mesons are made up of two entangled tubes (Quarks/Gluons), while protons and neutrons would be made up of three entangled tubes. (Quarks/Gluons) The "Color Charge" would be related to the XYZ coordinates (orientation) of entanglement. "Asymptotic Freedom", and "flux tubes" are logically based on this concept. The Dirac “belt trick” also reveals the concept of twist in the ½ spin of subatomic particles. If each twist cycle is proportional to h, we have identified the source of Quantum Mechanics as a consequence twist cycle geometry. Modern physicists say the Strong Force is mediated by a constant exchange of Mesons. The diagrams produced by some modern physicists actually represent the Strong Force like a spring connecting the two quarks. Asymptotic Freedom acts like real springs. Their drawing is actually more correct than their theory and matches perfectly to what I am saying in this model. You cannot separate the Gluons from the Quarks because they are a part of the same thing. The Quarks are the places where the Gluons are entangled with each other. Neutrinos would be made up of a twisted torus (like a twisted donut) within this model. The twist in the torus can either be Right-Hand or Left-Hand. Some twisted donuts can be larger than others, which can produce three different types of neutrinos. If a twisted tube winds up on one end and unwinds on the other end as it moves through space, this would help explain the “spin” of normal particles, and perhaps also the “Higgs Field”. However, if the end of the twisted tube joins to the other end of the twisted tube forming a twisted torus (neutrino), would this help explain “Parity Symmetry” violation in Beta Decay? Could the conversion of twist cycles to writhe cycles through the process of supercoiling help explain “neutrino oscillations”? Spatial curvature (mass) would be conserved, but the structure could change. ===================== Gravity is a result of a very small curvature imbalance within atoms. (This is why the force of gravity is so small.) Instead of attempting to explain matter as "particles", this concept attempts to explain matter more in the manner of our current understanding of the space-time curvature of gravity. If an electron has qualities of both a particle and a wave, it cannot be either one. It must be something else. Therefore, a "particle" is actually a structure which stores spatial curvature. Can an electron-positron pair (which are made up of opposite directions of twist) annihilate each other by unwinding into each other producing Gamma Ray photons? Does an electron travel through space like a threaded nut traveling down a threaded rod, with each twist cycle proportional to Planck’s Constant? Does it wind up on one end, while unwinding on the other end? Is this related to the Higgs field? Does this help explain the strange ½ spin of many subatomic particles? Does the 720 degree rotation of a 1/2 spin particle require at least one extra dimension? Alpha decay occurs when the two protons and two neutrons (which are bound together by entangled tubes), become un-entangled from the rest of the nucleons . Beta decay occurs when the tube of a down quark/gluon in a neutron becomes overtwisted and breaks producing a twisted torus (neutrino) and an up quark, and the ejected electron. The production of the torus may help explain the “Symmetry Violation” in Beta Decay, because one end of the broken tube section is connected to the other end of the tube produced, like a snake eating its tail. The phenomenon of Supercoiling involving twist and writhe cycles may reveal how overtwisted quarks can produce these new particles. The conversion of twists into writhes, and vice-versa, is an interesting process, which is also found in DNA molecules. Could the production of multiple writhe cycles help explain the three generations of quarks and neutrinos? If the twist cycles increase, the writhe cycles would also have a tendency to increase. Gamma photons are produced when a tube unwinds producing electromagnetic waves. ( Mass=1/Length ) The “Electric Charge” of electrons or positrons would be the result of one twist cycle being displayed at the 3D-4D surface interface of the particle. The physical entanglement of twisted tubes in quarks within protons and neutrons and mesons displays an overall external surface charge of an integer number. Because the neutrinos do not have open tube ends, (They are a twisted torus.) they have no overall electric charge. Within this model a black hole could represent a quantum of gravity, because it is one cycle of spatial gravitational curvature. Therefore, instead of a graviton being a subatomic particle it could be considered to be a black hole. The overall gravitational attraction would be caused by a very tiny curvature imbalance within atoms. We know there is an unequal distribution of electrical charge within each atom because the positive charge is concentrated within the nucleus, even though the overall electrical charge of the atom is balanced by equal positive and negative charge. In this model Alpha equals the compactification ratio within the twistor cone, which is approximately 1/137. 1= Hypertubule diameter at 4D interface 137= Cone’s larger end diameter at 3D interface where the photons are absorbed or emitted. The 4D twisted Hypertubule gets longer or shorter as twisting or untwisting occurs. (720 degrees per twist cycle.) How many neutrinos are left over from the Big Bang? They have a small mass, but they could be very large in number. Could this help explain Dark Matter? Why did Paul Dirac use the twist in a belt to help explain particle spin? Is Dirac’s belt trick related to this model? Is the “Quantum” unit based on twist cycles? I started out imagining a subatomic Einstein-Rosen Bridge whose internal surface is twisted with either a Right-Hand twist, or a Left-Hand twist producing a twisted 3D/4D membrane. This topological Soliton model grew out of that simple idea. I was also trying to imagine a way to stuff the curvature of a 3 D sine wave into subatomic particles. .

@davedsilva

8 ай бұрын

Wow! I'm going to spend time reading this with full concentration. How / where did you come up with this?

@SpotterVideo

8 ай бұрын

@@davedsilva I started out trying to understand "String Theory" but came to realize the number of spatial dimensions required to make it work seemed to make it unlikely. Then I started looking for a simpler idea that had only one extra spatial dimension.

@user-dialectic-scietist1

7 ай бұрын

These, my friend, are only abstractive without any proof theories. Read my explanation for the real answer!

@SpotterVideo

7 ай бұрын

@@user-dialectic-scietist1 Constructive criticism is a good thing. I did not see your explanation of the source of the "Quantum" in your answer. Did I miss something?

@user-dialectic-scietist1

7 ай бұрын

@@SpotterVideo The last theory of the quantum physics is about the quantum field. This field, for them, has miracle even god's possibilities to give to particles through the Higgs boson even masses. So, masses also can be transformed to energy and vise versa, and it is obvious that they believe that the energy for everything is coming from the quantum field. But this thesis forgets the fact that we are describing through field, a material property. With field, we are describing the possible space where a material's specific interaction, can take place. The property of something can't the same time to be and the creator of that! For the terms, for space, time, field, charge, spin, or what ever, when you forget the real meaning, and you create an abstractive thought about them, that doesn't mean that our thought exist. Only real things exist and not abstractive thought.

Bottom line: we can observe how the world works but not explain the how or why?

@Play4Vida

3 ай бұрын

From movement, friction. the nucleus has a positive proton that makes the negative electron circulate, proton attracts the electron. Like Earth gravitational core attracting the moon. But there are billions of them circulation. This circulation creates a magnetic field that creates energy, it's basically heat that combusts into useful energy. Now, the amount of energy generated will depend on the elements surrounding the atoms. The chemical components. This how our brain creates electricity and uses our nerve system to control movement and the use of our senses. It uses water as a conductor. Our organs are made of water that helps the electrons move. Also, this is how electricity is made. The source is a battery that has positive protons on one end and negative electrons on the other.. The best conductor is copper or steel. Because of the properties of steel the electrons are more loss, they get so loss they start moving at the speed of light creating a magnetic field and heat and thus creating electricity through friction of electrons. The chemicals in our brain and chemical compound in the battery determines how much amps it can create. Also, take into account we eat salts, sugars, and other elements which serves perfectly for a chemical reaction to facilitate the movement of electrons in us. The chemical reaction administer three things, the amount of energy, the type of energy and the amount of pressure to send the energy. Such a complex system but it's thanks to our planet. The melted core spinning in the center of our planet creates a magnetic field around our planet. I like to think we are electrical meat beings because of our magnetic planet. PS. I think the video is a waste of time. The information is well known. It's like they didn't research.

If only this video existed when I went to school - so good

@bigscientificquestions

7 ай бұрын

Thank you so much for this wonderful feedback 😊

How spooky, I had just asked myself this question a couple of days ago and YT presents me this video.

I always wondered about that. Kept me up nights, it did.

well explained but billions of years old electrons how do they continue their energy state? ae we living inside a simulation andinorde for simulation to constantly continue it is then constantly energised?

@i-m-alien

4 ай бұрын

which are the points that can explain that we live in simulation.....??

@Play4Vida

3 ай бұрын

From movement, friction. the nucleus has a positive proton that makes the negative electron circulate, proton attracts the electron. Like Earth gravitational core attracting the moon. But there are billions of them circulation. This circulation creates a magnetic field that creates energy, it's basically heat that combusts into useful energy. Now, the amount of energy generated will depend on the elements surrounding the atoms. The chemical components. This how our brain creates electricity and uses our nerve system to control movement and the use of our senses. It uses water as a conductor. Our organs are made of water that helps the electrons move. Also, this is how electricity is made. The source is a battery that has positive protons on one end and negative electrons on the other.. The best conductor is copper or steel. Because of the properties of steel the electrons are more loss, they get so loss they start moving at the speed of light creating a magnetic field and heat and thus creating electricity through friction of electrons. The chemicals in our brain and chemical compound in the battery determines how much amps it can create. Also, take into account we eat salts, sugars, and other elements which serves perfectly for a chemical reaction to facilitate the movement of electrons in us. The chemical reaction administer three things, the amount of energy, the type of energy and the amount of pressure to send the energy. Such a complex system but it's thanks to our planet. The melted core spinning in the center of our planet creates a magnetic field around our planet. I like to think we are electrical meat beings because of our magnetic planet.

@Play4Vida

3 ай бұрын

​@@i-m-alien no, explained it in my previous comment

@Play4Vida

3 ай бұрын

​@@i-m-alien From movement, friction. the nucleus has a positive proton that makes the negative electron circulate, proton attracts the electron. Like Earth gravitational core attracting the moon. But there are billions of them circulation. This circulation creates a magnetic field that creates energy, it's basically heat that combusts into useful energy. Now, the amount of energy generated will depend on the elements surrounding the atoms. The chemical components. This how our brain creates electricity and uses our nerve system to control movement and the use of our senses. It uses water as a conductor. Our organs are made of water that helps the electrons move. Also, this is how electricity is made. The source is a battery that has positive protons on one end and negative electrons on the other.. The best conductor is copper or steel. Because of the properties of steel the electrons are more loss, they get so loss they start moving at the speed of light creating a magnetic field and heat and thus creating electricity through friction of electrons. The chemicals in our brain and chemical compound in the battery determines how much amps it can create. Also, take into account we eat salts, sugars, and other elements which serves perfectly for a chemical reaction to facilitate the movement of electrons in us. The chemical reaction administer three things, the amount of energy, the type of energy and the amount of pressure to send the energy. Such a complex system but it's thanks to our planet. The melted core spinning in the center of our planet creates a magnetic field around our planet. I like to think we are electrical meat beings because of our magnetic planet. PS. I think the video is a waste of time. The information is well known. It's like they didn't research nor cared to actually study it.

@i-m-alien

3 ай бұрын

@@Play4Vida ....tired of double explaining....

You forgot to answer the question? There are some good pointers here from followers. The question about electrons is a good one. Try again.

Very descriptive....still haven't answered the question though. Why is there any energy at all?

@dr.rajabmlekwachimile8699

3 ай бұрын

The universe is a Pentium nature through mass and massless matter

Could it be that, matter inside a black hole is turned into energy? An (almost) infinitely small energy field with (almost) infinite energy?

@billcook7483

10 ай бұрын

What exactly is " almost infinite " ?

@thorfinsky1427

7 ай бұрын

Hooking up the power cables is a real bitch though.

@PM-fs2eg

7 ай бұрын

@@billcook7483 well... There's a finite mass going into singularity. So the "size" of singularity (if that makes any sense) determine the level of the energy field.

@cacogenicist

7 ай бұрын

​@@billcook7483- Exactly the same as "not anywhere close to infinite." 😊

@brassj67

4 ай бұрын

Yes it is called Hawking radiation. The matter inside the blackhole will continually emit hawking radiation and will eventually evaporate leaving no mass.

I'm going to watch it again.

Sometime we have issues with perception;, electrons move close to speed of light, so, for them the time is almost frozen, they have a very short time in they'r time, but in our time they have infinite time, and the orbit can be explained as; electrons move in the strait line in they'r perspective, but the proton curve the space, so for us and the protons, electrons seems to spin around the proton, that's why a number of protons can retain a fixed number of electrons on they'r orbit, atoms with more electrons decay to they'r stable form, in they'r perspective instantly, in ours depends of the stability of the atom, if they have less electrons they will capture electrons till become stable. But we need to always depict subatomic particles as they travel at close to the speed of light, so, they'r energy dissipate very quickly in they'r time as observers, but in ours as observers seems that they have infinite energy not being able to explain why they don't slow down or collapse into the nucleus.

Electron: Dude, check those bodatious vaves.

It’s something we derive power from by movement. A negative charge attracts a positive charge, and so on. 💯🤟

Great.

@bigscientificquestions

7 ай бұрын

Thank you so much 😊

I think electrons get there energy from the fact that they trade charges from each other. The duality of everything thing in the universe is crazy from the micro to the macro

We can observe , measure and classify beyond that I don't think we know much .

What I find absoloutely amazing, and to also add incomprehensible, is that it was 'discovered' (or determined?) that electrons spin - snd this was in c.1932!!

Thank you!

Physical reality looks and acts like a big perpetual motion machine. Every perpetual motion machine has a hidden supply of endless energy. You have not found the supply yet. You have found a way to swim around in the weirdness of science.

So the question still remains without the answer?

Thanks a lot

@bigscientificquestions

7 ай бұрын

You are welcome 😊

Thank you very much.

I heard some where that an electron can only be excited once. is it true ? If yes then plz tell me why, i couldn't find it on net

@matswessling6600

7 ай бұрын

what would that even mean? rlectrons doesnt have identity.

@Play4Vida

3 ай бұрын

From movement, friction. the nucleus has a positive proton that makes the negative electron circulate, proton attracts the electron. Like Earth gravitational core attracting the moon. But there are billions of them circulation. This circulation creates a magnetic field that creates energy, it's basically heat that combusts into useful energy. Now, the amount of energy generated will depend on the elements surrounding the atoms. The chemical components. This how our brain creates electricity and uses our nerve system to control movement and the use of our senses. It uses water as a conductor. Our organs are made of water that helps the electrons move. Also, this is how electricity is made. The source is a battery that has positive protons on one end and negative electrons on the other.. The best conductor is copper or steel. Because of the properties of steel the electrons are more loss, they get so loss they start moving at the speed of light creating a magnetic field and heat and thus creating electricity through friction of electrons. The chemicals in our brain and chemical compound in the battery determines how much amps it can create. Also, take into account we eat salts, sugars, and other elements which serves perfectly for a chemical reaction to facilitate the movement of electrons in us. The chemical reaction administer three things, the amount of energy, the type of energy and the amount of pressure to send the energy. Such a complex system but it's thanks to our planet. The melted core spinning in the center of our planet creates a magnetic field around our planet. I like to think we are electrical meat beings because of our magnetic planet. PS. I think the video is a waste of time. The information is well known. It's like they didn't research nor cared to actually study it.

@Play4Vida

3 ай бұрын

@Sara An electron gets neutralize when it touches a proton. The nucleus has a positive proton and the electron is negative so when they touch it becomes neutral, it becomes a neutron in the nucleus. They don't "stop existing" they are just dormant. It takes a chemical reaction to initiate the proton or electron again. If the chemical components are spent or expired then you won't be able to activate the dormant protons or electrons. Hope this helps.

so if electrons arent made out of anything smaller (possibly out of those energy waves) does that mean that every single electron in the entire universe has the same mass?

@brassj67

4 ай бұрын

Yes that is correct, There are only 2 fundamental particles, electrons and quarks and their antimatter counterparts, positrons and antiquarks. All fundamental particles have the same mass. A photon is actually a packet of energy that has no mass but lots of momentum.

Very informative 😮!!

@bigscientificquestions

3 ай бұрын

Thank you very much 😊

I was hoping you would explain if the electron violates the first law of thermodynamics. Is the electron in perpetual motion?

@ThePaterfamilious

7 ай бұрын

They got it wrong... (1st law of Thermodynamics) There are no closed systems in Nature, energy moves thru all systems just like it does in nature... Consciousness (Observation) determines what we see, in our given dimension such as a Frequency (Wave) or Mass (Particle)... Our senses just cannot see waves because they are not mass which is required in a 3 dimensional world... They really need to disclose the Unacknowledged Secret Access Programs!!!

@leonhardtkristensen4093

7 ай бұрын

As I understand it then there are no losses so it is more like the current in a super conductive ring. The energy stays there until it is taken out again but for an electron to exist it has a minimum energy. The electrons stay in their position because to push it into the kernel and combine with a proton and make a neutron need more energy then it has. If it get's smaller amounts of energy added it will just move outwards and eventually leave the atom. Perpetual motion is not disallowed if no energy is taken out. You can just not make or brake energy.

@matswessling6600

7 ай бұрын

on the contrary: the electron in the atom doesnt move.

@leonhardtkristensen4093

7 ай бұрын

@@matswessling6600That is too bad for you. Nothing will work for you if they don't for you.

@matswessling6600

7 ай бұрын

@@leonhardtkristensen4093 what? what was that supposed to mean? in the atom electrons are at rest.

Starts with saying that it "orbits" only to later say that it definitely does "not orbit"...

Now I understand, positive repels negative because of Pauli and there are neutron stars and black holes.

“An orbit is a state of constant acceleration”, this is a bit misleading. What they mean is it is in a constant state of change of direction. Although it may maintain the same rotational velocity, because it isn’t moving in a linear way, it is accelerating rotationally.

@matswessling6600

7 ай бұрын

it isnt misleading at all. change of direction is an acceleration.

@THE-X-Force

4 ай бұрын

@@matswessling6600They make it sound like the velocity increases .. and it doesn't.

@matswessling6600

4 ай бұрын

@@THE-X-Force ? no, they dont.

@THE-X-Force

4 ай бұрын

@@matswessling6600Yes, they do ?

@matswessling6600

4 ай бұрын

@@THE-X-Force when?

This was very enjoyable.

謝謝！

So where energy electrons get? The answer is that if electron and proton is a particles the electron try to satisfy positive charge of proton. The biggest force of attraction is in opposite site of electron positional. So electron like entropy goes where biggest attraction. So from here is coming Heisenberg principle, - we get probability of electron . The question is why electron not fall to proton to make neutron answer is how neutron star forming , - after big explosion where force of proton repel force was overcome

Think about permanent magnets. Put 2 ring magnets on a shaft, same poles facing, and they will stay repelled for a very loooooong time. Not quite a perpetual motion machine, but certainly a machine close to doing perpetual WORK (ie. lifting the weight of the magnet on top).

@drscott1

7 ай бұрын

I suppose technically if the weight is not moving there is no work done. W=FxD

@pj_ytmt-123

7 ай бұрын

@@drscott1 Does a spring do work? You could turn a pair of repelling magnets into a spring. ✌️

@drscott1

7 ай бұрын

@@pj_ytmt-123 ya the definition of work can be a tricky one

Thank you siripron.

So are we supposed to tell YOU where electrons get their energy - because that question was not answered in the video.

I have a passing interest in advancements in science as it helps in my abstract and spiritual retrospections. The following musings are one such, I grant that I maybe entirely wrong.

You still didn’t answer the question stated in the title of this video.

Is it possible that after a collapse to a black hole there's something else that prevents gravity from an infinite collapse? Another "quantum barrier"?

1:43 - They are not orbits; they are orbitals. This distinction is important.

still doesn't answer the question, in the end it is just orbiting the nuclear perpetually from where its energy it get?

Memories of Fermi-Dirac statistics in Quantum Statistical Mechanics....

The electron does not have a cloud of probabilities. The cloud of probabilities exists only in our observations -- i.e. when two quants interact.

@matswessling6600

7 ай бұрын

and how do you prove that...

@timeflex

7 ай бұрын

@@matswessling6600 By the fact that detection is the interaction, therefore we can only talk about interactions and nothing else.

@matswessling6600

7 ай бұрын

@@timeflex assume you have a beam of electrons that has all spin up in a specific direction (say x) ( deflected by a magnetic field). if you apply the same magnetic field again they will all have spin up. if you instead use an ortogonal magnetic field to measure spin in an ortogonal direction (say y) then you will get a 50% probability for each electron to have spin up in that ditection. since it doesnt matter how long we wait to do that measurement it is safe to say that the state of having undetermined spin in y occurred when we measured spin relative x since that is what caused it.

@timeflex

7 ай бұрын

@@matswessling6600 how exactly do you plan to verify any of those states without interactions?

@matswessling6600

7 ай бұрын

@@timeflex Do you know the Stern-Gerlach experiement? That was what I triee to explain to you. the fact that the spin in y is probabalistic is caused by measuring the spin in x. every next measurement of spin in y be non-probabalistic. thus spin y is probabilistic since we measures spin x. that is what is observed.

I guess we don't really know. But, we have learned how to make use of those ting charged little darlings, and we are thankful for that. We may never "know" what the universe is about because we are just beginning to understand, model, the physiscal world we perceive, as we percieve it.

Electeons are my favorate particle.

From the neighbour universe sheet, because electrons are not particles: They just seem to be particles when intersecting wiht our sheet.

Great Vid but bottom line is (same as Philosophy) "It is stranger than we can think" RBS Haldane.

Sounds like perpetual motion?Since all particles gained their energy from the start( big bang?)and still have the same energy,it seems.

From the universal energy locker under e for electron.

Ahhhh! Well, that explains it... I still have no freaking clue what "it" is. But that explains it.

Wouldn’t this come down to quantum physics that mere mortals can not understand?

Super cool, but what on earth is a valve in this context?

You do know electrons don't actually orbit rhe nucleus, right? Why do your graphics show them doing so?

@YarUnderoaker

10 ай бұрын

It waving around nucleus. If you can calculate center of 3D wave than this center is orbiting around nucleus. Depends on your needs...

@pakarpintu4917

2 ай бұрын

The higher orbital they move free, in lower orbital they have rest place

The origin of matter and energy is unknown to a rigid physical scientific model. We are far too arrogant and blind to improve the prime analysis (Socrates) and the improved version of it, the scientific method (Francis Bacon). “Beyond the veil of time and matter does the truth lie in wait, but therein it will be far too late.”

Cumbersome explanation.

Infinity = video explaining this video, then a video to explain the explaination, then a video to explain that explaination video etc. . . .

confused,,, some sites say the electrons are a long way from the nucleus ,This shows them very close in proportion of their size of corse ,,

😅😮😅😮😅😅😅😅well information good show you 😅😅😅

So when an electron falls below the lowest possible energy state is falls into the nucleus and interacts with a proton to create a neutron?

It’s because fermions have a higher dimensional component? The electron cannot lose the energy dimensionally that is maintaining by looping at the speed of light. When a positron and an electron collide they untie each other and release photons. But other than that the electron will go on forever being an electron interacting with 3D space through charge.

@alphagt62

7 ай бұрын

I think the one thing missing from this conversation is field theory. According to field theory, as I understand it, space itself is made up of fields, or “ brains”. When there is a disturbance in one field, it will contract the nearest field, and a sub atomic particle pops into existence. If this particle finds a mate, another particle to interact with, it becomes stable and remains in existence. Including electrons, it is a sub atomic particle. Fields permeate space from edge to edge, top to bottom, it supplies the energy that causes all these particles to continue to exist. As we’ve heard, particles pop in and out of existence in pairs, they pop in and out seemingly from nowhere, but what is causing this are the moments in the fields when they touch each other. But, when one of these particles is magnetically paired to another particle, they stay in existence. This might be an over simplified explanation of field theory, but there are some great videos out there than can explain it better than I, Arvin Ash has some great stuff on the subject.

@alancham4

7 ай бұрын

@@alphagt62 space acts like it’s made of little dipoles. These could be considered electron positron virtual particle pairs. But there is conservation of energy in all cases of particles coming into and out of existence. Fermions that already exist don’t decay. Branes would be multi-dimensional.

@alexjames6747

5 ай бұрын

There is no such a thing " 3D space" . Space doesn't have dimentions.

From the dimension where energy exist in another state

Like light, electrons travel at light speed to conserve energy. Time stands still at light speed, so if no time passes, no energy can be used. The energy to get to light speed is given when the photon or electron was started, or put in orbit around a proton. Just matter which can travel in space forever, at a constant speed, so can an electron or a photon.

@oldbloke135

11 ай бұрын

I'm not sure where you get the idea that electrons travel at the speed of light c. The "speed" of an electron in the first orbit of a hydrogen atom in its ground state is c/137. A free electron with an energy of 220keV travels at about 0.9c in free space. It takes giga electron volts to get it up to 0.999c. It's not possible to get it up to c because it would require infinite energy.

@bryandraughn9830

9 ай бұрын

​@@oldbloke135 People just make stuff up and announce their wisdom to the world. I have no idea where they get this stuff.😅

@user-dialectic-scietist1

7 ай бұрын

But you do not read the moment when an electron is changing orbit, and then it has present in energy exchange! Even more, the Hydrogen electron, travels with a speed less than light! And we you think that travel with the speed of light can stop the time? What do you think is time?

@peelsreklaw

7 ай бұрын

@@oldbloke135 I thought electrons are quantum wave functions? Is it even right to say they travel at all?

We go in circle. The rules and principles were discovered to explain the behavior of the electron. And then we say the electrons must behave this way because of the rules we discovered. This is not science.

From 220 v you get it and 340 v

You got your answer in your bold face title. In the middle of the first line, you have an E of electrons. Right below that is a T and below that is an E and R. Ether forces given those particles and all macro systems their energy. The real important question is how it is absorbed!?

@egoideam

Жыл бұрын

You're cheating, where is the letter 'H'?

@user-dialectic-scietist1

7 ай бұрын

Forces? What is that? Forces do not exist in real. They are only a math and a geometrical try for the explanation of interactions!

The background music behind the talk is DREADFUL - GET RID OF IT

Wow! Now I understand perfectly how a perpetual motion machine actually works...

@thorstambaugh1520

7 ай бұрын

They are not perpetual

From moving thru a magnetic field. Or if they are bound to an atom, being struck by a photon.

What's a vave?

I found myself thinking, "liken it to a vell?" and then "Liken this to a vave". I figured out from the accompanying video that she meant "well" and "wave"

@irenerosenberg3609

4 ай бұрын

I never did get the "well" or the point of the bucket of water.

@THE-X-Force

4 ай бұрын

I thought it was "vowel". Obviously they should have added actual closed captions. Well, I guess it wasn't obvious to them .. but it should have been.

Why’s it saying the electron has a lot of mass when it doesn’t

Light supports most particle behaviour.

Just your daily dose of "scientific" ChatGPT videos.

Imagine a PhD level texts in front of nursary children. common people's and just similar in understanding and intrests for quantum physics..

All physical systems seek to lose their energy as fast as their environment will allow. A cup of hot water will cool faster when placed in a cold room than if placed in a warm room. But when the temperatures are balanced, then no more cooling will occur and no more energy is lost. The electron does not have everlasting energy, it just exists in a environment that does not permit it to lose energy

What happens of they stop spinning?

@pakarpintu4917

2 ай бұрын

nothing, except in lowest skin(orbital) they goes to nucleus