I hope you enjoyed my third video. Just started this channel, subscribe pls! (So you can say you were here from the start) I have many videos prepared for the upcoming days :) follow me: twitter.com/LancellotiFilms/with_replies

@chuckstehney2783

2 ай бұрын

Operation Kino

@rukeyser

22 күн бұрын

You a jewel .

@damjanbabic6768

9 күн бұрын

What's there to enjoy about a clickbait, misleading video? Genuine question

@rukeyser

9 күн бұрын

@@damjanbabic6768 i hate clickbait titles, but this guy aint that. He *is* prepared to go deep and way back in his analysis of the subjects he chooses. I go heavy deep & real on *my* informed passions, so that's fine w me. When someone like that is looking at Tarantino - who is also a heavy & deep film fan - that means Lancelloti is gonna see more than i do. When he's discussed things i *do* know well, it's been good - so altho i dont know Tarantino that well, Im happy to listen to someone who does.

I'm not sure how this video ended up in my recommended section, but I'm genuinely impressed. It was a very good watch, and I hadn't even realized how new this channel is. Great content

@lancelloti.

2 ай бұрын

Thanks! You have no idea how crucial it is for us new channels to get feedback like this. I'm stoked you enjoyed my video :)

@deezovaries4263

20 күн бұрын

I subbed too !

@mosesman01

18 күн бұрын

I'm not sure how I saw this comment, but i'm genuinely impressed. It was a great read and it is new.

Great analysis. For me the biggest role reversal in "Inglorious Basterds" is the basement scene. Nazi Major is actually portrayed as admirable and extremely brave. After Fasbender's character points 3 fingers wrong, Major realizes that there is something cheesy, but does not choose the safe approach - calling the backup and confronts the basterds to the end. Even takes the inevitable death with dignity.

@lancelloti.

2 ай бұрын

Thanks, bro! you are my first comment ever haha. I love that scene because essentially it's Tarantino playing with our expectation of what we should see in a character like that.

@frankfort4717

2 ай бұрын

@@lancelloti.first comment you had wow this will be history

@ExtremeFilmEnthusiast

Ай бұрын

@@lancelloti. congrats, bro, just now realized that your channel kinda blew up 😀great work and keep more incoming!

@MajorCoolD

23 күн бұрын

True, though one could argue wheter it was brave or foolish though. :) However I DO like the fact that Terentino did try to portray the 'bad guys' as more than just two dimensional cardboard cutouts. I myself was a bit stunned how some of my american friends seemed to lack any self-reflection and failed to see how the Basterds arent really 'the good guys', considering that by their very actions they are war criminals in every sense of the word and by the Geneva Convention(s). And the fact that killing prisoners of war is always bad even if it can be 'justified' (and all sides historically DID engage in that to some extent or another, afterall 'take no prisoners' is technically an order for a Warcrime, but sometimes you simply CAN'T take any prisoners [either due to being behind enemy lines, having no manpower to spare or having no facilities to house said prisoners] and it DID historically happen. War makes Beasts of Men, no matter what flag they are fighting for. However it's even worse if the supposed Soldiers do it for 'sports', like with our Jew Bear. Beating an unarmed prisoner to death with a baseball bat (while his armed buddies around make sure he cant fight back or flee) is pretty barbaric no matter who does it against whom.

@immanuelcunt7296

20 күн бұрын

​@@MajorCoolD Sometimes "good guy" is relative

Your analysis of the Bear Jew scene where he beats the Nazi officers head in was superb. You pretty much give me a new perspective on the title of the movie, because you show how very inglorious the Bear Jew is, especially how unheroic his whole angry baseball rant. And your analysis of the cinematic language is spot on. Keep the videos coming, i am glad to subscribe :)

@lancelloti.

2 ай бұрын

Thanks bro! Im glad yoy enjoyed my analysis and got something out of it. Your comment means a lot, especially during these early stages of building this channel. Greetings to you, and I sincerely hope you continue to enjoy my content!

@Angel-Otk

2 ай бұрын

Especially his voice cracks when he’s screaming😭🤣it just adds to how phony his grandeur is

@BigUriel

23 күн бұрын

I think there may be a bit of over-analysing there. The Basterds are not in it for justice or morality, or even to end the war. They are there for revenge. Aldo says so with his introduction, he's specifically looking for Jews to carry out this mission, and his goal is to kill Nazis, not on the open field in large numbers to turn the tide of the war, but in brutal, guerrilla tactics style to make the Nazis *fear* them. That's the whole point, to come across as so sadistic that the Nazi soldiers will have nightmares about being caught by them. The Bear Jew's assault is pure catharsis - for him, for the rest of the Basterds, and largely for the audience who sometimes get a little tired of nuanced villains with strong motives that make us question whether they really are bad people or just making the best they can out of a bad situation, and often get away without truly answering for their crimes - Tarantino gives us the simple satisfaction of seeing a bad guy get brutally beaten to death with a baseball bat.

@BigUriel

23 күн бұрын

I think there may be a bit of over-analysing there. The Basterds are not in it for justice or morality, or even to end the war. They are there for revenge. Aldo says so with his introduction, he's specifically looking for Jews to carry out this mission, and his goal is to kill Nazis, not on the open field in large numbers to turn the tide of the war, but in brutal, guerrilla tactics style to make the Nazis fear them. That's the whole point, to come across as so sadistic that the Nazi soldiers will have nightmares about being caught by them. The Bear Jew's assault is pure catharsis - for him, for the rest of the Basterds, and largely for the audience who sometimes get a little tired of nuanced villains with strong motives that make us question whether they really are bad people or just making the best they can out of a bad situation, and often get away without truly answering for their crimes - Tarantino gives us the simple satisfaction of seeing a bad guy get brutally beaten to death with a baseball bat.

@BigUriel

23 күн бұрын

I think there may be a bit of over-analysing there. The Basterds are not in it for justice or morality, or even to end the war. They are there for revenge. Aldo says so with his introduction, he's specifically looking for Jews to carry out this mission, and his goal is to kill Nazis, not on the open field in large numbers to turn the tide of the war, but in brutal, guerrilla tactics style to make the Nazis fear them. That's the whole point, to come across as so sadistic that the Nazi soldiers will have nightmares about being caught by them. The Bear Jew's assault is pure catharsis - for him, for the rest of the Basterds, and largely for the audience who sometimes get a little tired of nuanced villains with strong motives that make us question whether they really are bad people or just making the best they can out of a bad situation, and often get away without truly answering for their crimes - Tarantino gives us the simple satisfaction of seeing a bad guy get brutally beaten to death with a baseball bat.

Clickbait, all you're doing is yapping about meta cinema - not how he "mocks" other directors.

@fannepak

9 күн бұрын

Yeah. Fine analysis on meta cinema. Not getting the roasting angle.

@ivarmh

6 күн бұрын

Thanks for the warning.

@kobiianardo

4 күн бұрын

thaank you for your service 🫡

@menso3852

3 күн бұрын

agreed, what exactly does cinema gaining "deeper self-awareness" mean anyway?

@dougdouglass6126

Күн бұрын

Thanks for the heads up. Saved me from wasting any time on this video or this creator.

some great points and analysis here. Even though the title Inglorious Basterds is cribbed from another movie from the seventies one of the things I love about Quentin Tarantino's movies is that they are about exactly what it says on the tin. A reservoir Dog is someone who rats on the police, pulp fiction gives you the definition of the word and structures the story around this, Jackie Brown is about Jackie Brown, Kill Bill is about trying to kill Bill etc. reminds me of going to see The Hateful Eight with my then girlfriend and she was almost nauseous with the inertia of all their bad actions saying: "Did every single character have to be so vicious and evil?" I thought, well yeah. The title spells out for us from the start 😅

@MajorCoolD

23 күн бұрын

I mean you can argue that the soon to be Sheriff is technically not evil and rephrensible by himself, though he was brought up a southern boy and lives in the early post-civil War period. So naturally... well you know? XD

@98loud

20 күн бұрын

@@MajorCoolD weird that you give the justification to the literal racist but the black colonel getting revenge against the people who put him and his people in chains doesn't get a pass

@Prikense

20 күн бұрын

@@98loud well, his revenge was very extreme and he still murders people for his own selfish interests either way

@ab4845

19 күн бұрын

"Jackie Brown is about Jackie Brown, Kill Bill is about trying to kill Bill" You've really uncovered some very deep truths there... No wonder Tarantino's bullshit impresses you...

@wjzav1971

16 күн бұрын

English is not my native language but I think Kill Bill is actually a double meaning. On the one hand, its about Killing Bill. But Kill Bill is also a coloquial term for a hit list. As in, Kiddo works through a list of people she wants to kill.

Tarantino is my favorite director but even I suspect that much of what he does is simply because it looks cool or is an homage to something that came before, not everything is a sophisticated meta commentary

@lockekappa500

12 күн бұрын

I think you downplay just how genius these people are at their craft. It takes a VERY learned person to craft these movies in the way that they do. Tarantino lives and breathes cinema, maybe even more than any director ever has.(as proven by his insistence in not only making films, but making his films ABOUT films) If anyone would have a meta commentary on Hollywood and cinema, it would be him.

@Jehosaphet

12 күн бұрын

This is where I'm at...way perceptive analysis, thoughtful and provocative, but ultimately I think its reaching.

@ryuk5673

12 күн бұрын

​@@lockekappa500 he's not downplaying. And you arent' neccessarily wrong, but I would have to agree that this video did not do a good job at explaining it. Video got close, but overall was making confusing points. And yes, some were reaching... Its not hard to see the metaphor of an audience watching movie within the movie. Clever yes..Genius? not really..in fact i would say its more preditable than clever given Tarantino's history. Satire , yes....sophisticated? not really.

@lockekappa500

12 күн бұрын

@@ryuk5673 I dunno, I think there's as much genius in Tarantino's work as the best directors out there. I don't think anyone else can make the same movies he does.

@ryuk5673

12 күн бұрын

​@@lockekappa500oh sorry, there absolutely 100% is genius in his movies. That i agree! I just meant not in the way the uploader was saying though. Tarantino's genius imo is his seemingly unique ability to transform a relatively normal looking scene of 2 people eating breakfast into some of the most amazing dialogue you've ever heard.

The title of this video is 100% just clickbait

please make more of these, video essays are my jam

@lancelloti.

2 ай бұрын

more are coming soon!

One of the things I like the most about Inglorious Basterds is that it also constitutes a huge F-you to the American reticence to watch movies with subtitles.

@mk-ultramags1107

19 күн бұрын

It should've won the Oscar for Best Original Screenplay too but those said subtitles seem to turn voters off and it's BS. It's as if they thought QT did it simply to be "clever."

love the subtle transistion at 1:00

amazing video, Great editing, not overly long, good pacing, and good argument. You got yourself a new subscriber.

@lancelloti.

2 ай бұрын

thank you so much, bro! I'm glad you enjoyed the video, and I hope you continue to enjoy my content :)

this is a well written video, i hope you continue to upload. you have potential:)

great video essay. I hope you keep making these. great editing.

@lancelloti.

2 ай бұрын

thank you! more videos are coming soon

Its still amazing to me that Tarantino watched so many movies, said "I could do that" and did it so freaking well

This is really good bro, like seriously impressive I beg you to keep going, you'll one hundred percent find a big audience

@lancelloti.

2 ай бұрын

Thanks bro

Almost watched them all 😎 Gonna recommend your channel to friends of mine 🤙 Keep your great work up man and continue your journey to success 👑💜

You're definitely reading into this too much. Agreed that these movies subvert your expectations but I don't think Tarantino 'mocks' these films the way you're suggesting. It's merely showing them a mirror. You said Tarantino does this so as to avoid the glorification of war but I'd argue his stylistic violence does exactly that in Inglorious Basterds. The forced comparison with a movie like 1917 which came out years after IB does feel like reaching a bit.

@bastianeilks3899

24 күн бұрын

I agree. Inglorious Bastards is all about the joy and vindication of killing people as evil as the Nazis. The Bastards are not portrayed as small and uminpressive to make them less heroic, but rather to make their achievements seem even greater. These aren't some super professional spies, these are just some all-american boys ready to fight evil.

@marqc.9904

24 күн бұрын

Mocking might have been the incorrect term, but I do think that QT is holding a mirror up to the audience at times regarding their interest in war films as propaganda (while still making a "propaganda" esque war film of his own). The film's Bear Jew introduction as well as the ridiculous situation the Basterds find themselves in by the of the film are great examples of this. It's almost like if you remove the soundtrack from a Rocky movie--it's just a bunch of grunting and sweating.

@ab4845

19 күн бұрын

Are you seriously expecting common sense and logic from a Tarantino fanboy/stan?

@Rongez

12 күн бұрын

@@ab4845 What fanboy are you talking about? The creator of the video? If that is who you meant, then you don't understand what 'fanboy' means.

@lockekappa500

12 күн бұрын

Tarantino doesn't need to know the exact scene that 1917 will have. He knows that movie will come out already, and already has come out. It's not a stretch if it's within our predictable nature to make movies like this.

Wow really well editted, man! Very good script too

@lancelloti.

2 ай бұрын

thanks bro

The production and quality of the video is quite a surprise. Good luck with your channel's future endeavors.

@lancelloti.

2 ай бұрын

Thank you very much!

Interesting thinking here. Instant subscription. Thank you for your effort, will look forward to more from you. All the best!

@lancelloti.

2 ай бұрын

thank you! i appreciate those kind words

Just here to let everyone know that I was here before you blew up, because with your video quality you most certainly will in the future. I was really surprised when I saw that you didn't have more than 500k subs

@lancelloti.

25 күн бұрын

thank you so much

I still like the theory that the film within the film is the commentary, because Inglourious Basterds _didn't_ subvert expectations. It actually captures the 2000s zeitgeist well. See also Downfall (2004) or Valkyrie (2008).

quentin: oh really? i don't know that. that's interesting

WHOA - 7 minutes left me wanting a LOT more!!❤❤❤

How long are your arms to make such a reach

@soaphustler

19 күн бұрын

Bot

I find it offensive that someone would compare a WWI film to a WWII film.

Very good video! I'm coming from the Andy Serkis one and now i'm decided to watch them all :)

I just watched all of your videos not noticing you had 1,29k suscribers! Your content is amazing and i can ensure that you'll get TONS of suscribers one day to another soon. Keep up the great content!

@lorenzomarquesini7136

2 ай бұрын

Your content is amazing i think you should make more "clickbaity" thumbnails in order to get more people to watch it. It might be even worth hiring someone expert on thumbnails to update the ones in your current videos. Note. Your current thumbnails and video editing is amazing. My suggestion is to increase views

@lorenzomarquesini7136

2 ай бұрын

One extra comment. If you had say you are just 3 weeks into this channel and a suscription would help you out i think many people would do it! This is high quality content and deserves more recognition!

@lancelloti.

2 ай бұрын

Hi bro, thank you very much for all those comments! i really appreciate those words

It wasn’t just any regular degular audience in that theater but the most wealthy and powerful elites of the military and ruling class.

Solid video. I think Funny Games by Haneke is another one that challenges the audience and other filmmakers. I've only seen the original, not his own remake, but that movie definitely had me squirming and questioning myself.

Very great video, new subscriber now. Also this is my personal favorite movie ever, and now I just like it more

Officially here from the start! Let’s goo!

@lancelloti.

2 ай бұрын

Welcome aboard! Hope not to disappoint :)

He has a wicked sense of humor. Runs hotter than most.

Excellent analysis. I already loved this movie but now I love it even more. Very insightful.

@lancelloti.

2 ай бұрын

thank you! just uploaded a new video today :)

Great video. Definitely keep at it!

@lancelloti.

2 ай бұрын

thank you bro! more videos are coming soon

This first hero scene ... when the "hero" comes out of the tunnel into the light .... ahem ... who is sitting right next to him, eating once again? 😂 At least he stops when the madness starts. I really enjoyed your video, I think this meta-thing is an important subject. How many people think their TV talks to them when they first experience the metaverse of movies? It can be overwhelming, frightening even. It takes some practice and getting used to to watch several layers at once. They don't teach us that at school. Multitasking 2.0. 😂 Tarantino, like Fincher, uses so many layers, so many references, they know all the tricks. It's impossible to get them all in one go. I have no idea how they do it. It must be magic. A movie is made by a large team of people, they all have to work together to create master-puzzle-pieces like that. I love them, I could spend hours to piece it all together. I loved puzzles as a child, too. The satisfaction when the image finally emerges. I never wanted to see the picture before and I hated that they all show you the picture from the start. I wanted the surprise, the suspense. With these films you get exactly that. Did you get the reference with the scalping? This is Tristan, the bear who is a native, diguising as a cowboy, who loses it when he fails to protect his little brother. He goes full native warrior and brings home the scalps of the enemies and the heart of his brother. And he loses control over his inner beast, the bear who is his brother in blood. They marked each other. I'm not that fond of this concept, because it's actually not what the bear stands for in native culture. He is a teacher, a healer who knows all the plants and people learned from him to hole up in warm and cozy caves during winter, to gather food during summer and fall and to preserve energy. Medicine men often have the bear as their spirit animal. But he is also fierce if somebody challenges him or disturbes his sleep. Maybe Tristan should have put his knife out of reach. Much easier than what he did . Men ... why take it easy if you can complicate things endlessly. 😂 But that's a very small part of bear nature. I'm not really surprised that this culture is so fixated on this part. I remember reading something about the jewish bear in your video. Another hint, but I have no idea what this is about. Mother Russia is the bear. Nobody ever survived a confrontation with mother bear, not Napoleon and not that pathetic gnome with the hilarious thing under his nose everybody seems to be wearing at that time - and his rabid mutts of war. They still live under the bridges. Nowadays we call them trolls. Sometimes they feel brave and roam the streets in numbers. But I'm hopeful that more and more people see them as what they are. Pathetic cowards who hide if their numbers are not at least three to one and they're armed to the teeth. They only pick the weekest ones for a fight, that's all they can do. When they are alone one strong move silences them. Their dream is over, no matter what they believe. They don't even understand the signs they use. Two suns don't mean double power. Two suns will just make barbeque. Way too hot to survive. It will end in a desert, in scorched earth. I'm german, by the way. 🤣

Fascinating! I'm very interested to learn if you see the same metacriticism in his older films, mainly b/c Inglourious (psst, you misspelled your hashtag) Basterds was the first QT film I wasn't completely sold on. With your explanation, I can see why this and OUATIH are heralded as brilliant, but I wonder if it's a factor in why I don't find them as entertaining as Jackie Brown, Death Proof, and everything preceding IB.

Great analysis! Subbed 💪

Did Eli Roth "bear jew" do a tribute to "Hostel" in the tunnel scene in the Bastards? Hmm

Good one! I'd enjoy some longer form content, too. I've been here from the start! 😅

Amazing video!!

Brilliant analysis!

are you the carbon? Because you looks so similar and the edition is similar, anyway amazing job

Excellent observations

Great video man, also handsome 🥵 i love good video essays and you deliver it well. $ubscribed dawg

How are first two scenes similar?

Wow what an awesome analysis! Can I ask you where do you get your sources for this? I wish to understand if your vision is the same as Tarantino's.

@ryuk5673

12 күн бұрын

wdym? the source is the movie. He's analyzing it. (also) it was an "good" analysis. Some of his points are just confusing though and not fully developed.

Nice analysis

Great analysis! I know this may seem pretty random at first glance, but I'd like to take this opportunity to bring up which is probably my ultimate pet peeve, the ending of Game of Thrones and how unfairly (!) I think it is being treated (yes, you've read that right! 😁I'm aware it's an unpopular opinion...) (I mean, I'm aware that some people "only" complain about how it's executed, which I also disagree with to a certain extend, but not completely; many DON'T seem able to distinguish between what happens and how it happens, though, not to mention the latter is connected to apparently not really getting the point...). You see, I keep saying that Game of Thrones has been doing something very similar to Tarantino, including what you describe here, pretty much from the beginning and not just because both are obviously very violent (the infamous "killing off beloved characters", for example didn't shock me nearly as much, because Tarantino had already "desensitized" me to it through what he did to poor Shosanna 😄) and that understanding that is the key to being able to appreciate its "oh so terrible" ending (which many still deny could possibly be the author's own, so again, it's NOT "just" about how it's executed). So, long story short, I guess my question is, what do you think about that (and would you be interesting in watching the (not very professional, mind you; also, please don't hold being German against me, I didn't become one on purpose 😄) video(s) I made on the subject? In which I don't actually mention Tarantino, but still...) (A hint for understanding what I mean by that, might be, among other things, what Quentin said about the "Joker" movie... But I can (!) also elaborate in a different comment, of course...)

It’s like rap beef in subtle film form.

great video & immediately subscribed, keep it up! greetings from indonesia

@lancelloti.

Ай бұрын

Thanks bro!

Honestly, this video is way too short. I don't know that I've seen anything from this channel before, but you could've easily tacked on another 5-7 minutes and I would've stayed hooked. Basically what I'm saying is: well done, but do more!

Just want you to know that I am one of the 32 subscribers. A masterpiece of a video, *chef kiss*.

@lancelloti.

2 ай бұрын

thank you so much! welcome aboard :)

Amazing analisis!

Actually the bullets and aiming at the audience was an homage to Sam Fuller, director of the Big Red One, that used that device in his film. He said the only way you could make a truthful war film was if you had someone behind the screen shooting at the audience. I didn't realize this until you pointed out.

very well done man

Q-man would never make fun of Sam Raimi, though. One of his main inspirado-mongers from whom he derived inspirado with great relish. Even if there were no feet for him to ogle. Ever notice how Q-man's movies, especially his more recent ones, have a pattern to them? If one of them has a German villain, the next one will have a German hero. If one has a Southern villain, the next one will have a Southern hero. And if not a "hero," per se, then at least a sympathetic character. Or even the mentor to the main hero (which is still a kind of heroic Sage archetype).

that was cool! Would have never guesses any of that. Although once you point it out it’s like ohhhhhh yes that does make sense!😅 So i was also thinking, I wish there would be… maybe there already is… a “Tarantino”, if you will, of youtube videos. I mean like, someone who semi half parodies all the different video production styles of youtube videos while simultaneously covering a subject sincerely and or geniunely, while leaving all sorts of easter eggs around for one to sleuth out or find out. ohhhh what fun it would be!

Man I was not prepared to see the actual scalping scene in a video on KZread. At least we know now he does not do this for money.

Haven't watched the video yet but the excessive narration at the end of once upon a time in Hollywood is spot on to so many Wes Anderson films

"Activar Windows" at the bottom of the screen is how i know you're a real one

The "Jewish Bear' as it was phrased was at one point intended to be played by Adam Sandler

Very nice. I subbed you.

Subversion sweetly offered with such slight.

Here before you blow up. Great stuff.

This video found me and this channel 💯

Guess you had to see it.

When you realize that ElCarbon ahora tiene un canal en inglés

little confusing in some parts but nice video

Practically every Tarantino movie from Kill Bill is built around a pretty simple formula: establish a villain who is so evil, the audience is willing to revel in them receiving the most sadistic torture (a rapist who sold rides on a female coma victim, a guy who goes around hunting women in a deathproof car, Nazis, slaveowners, the Manson family). But because Tarantino's films are so rewatchable, you inevitably realize that the real message is that both the hero and the audience are capable of becoming as evil as the villain; the real evil is in dehumanizing your enemy.

Probably no, but it is his twist. Reference Jack rabbit slims footwork.

I always forget Mike Myers is in this film

why he do's. I can't unhear that at the end.

What I really love about Tarantino is that he has two levels of violence. The most obvious display is Django. You have the "violence" that Django causes, like to the slavers which is incredibly "entertaining". And then you have the violence of "slavery" which is extremely disturbing. And yet, on the surface it's all violence. But it does not have the same effect on the audience.

I was here before you blew up

I don't think "mocking" is the word, but he does mention in so many interviews that subversion is in fact one of his main goals. Which I don't think shows any disrespect towards the source material, but rather wants to trick his audience. And while this may sound cliche, I don't think I've seen a lot of directors actually flipping the tropes 180 with such efficiency. He is a joker. Every movie of his I watch I know I like because I can't stop laughing. I'm not laughing because the dialogue has jokes. I'm laughing because what is happening as I watch the movie I am fully aware is extremely funny. And by the way there's layers to this subversion too, because when you're used to his style turning everything into a joke, this all is an elaborate anti-joke of which the anti-punchline is the ending to OUATIH... which is an incredibly sad ending... And the reason I think he does that is like you say sincere. If you deal in arts you want to move people. But in order to move people they need to have their guard down. So in order to let their guard down, he does away with all the cliches they're conditioned to by subverting them. This way once all of that is removed, at the end what's left is the meat of it all.

@lockekappa500

12 күн бұрын

The irony is that cliches end up undermining your own material. Has the danger of stripping them of all their nuance. And I think that's why it's so powerful to break them down and rise above them.

6:40 On Howard Stern's he said OUATIH was his best work...

@lockekappa500

12 күн бұрын

Well, OUATIH didn't exist in 2009, so it would have been hard for him to think that.

So I don't like star wars, just like Freddy Mercury said in the bicycle/ Fat Bottom Girls song. I do love the ending of star wars. The hacker's dream of the kill switch. Inglorious Basterds is the Quentin Tarantino version of Star wars

they aren't the same people in saving private Ryan is not the same its a misconception so that is not a good example..one is an infantryman and the other is an ss solider, you make valid points tho

"Inquire" rhymes with "wire", not "here", just fyi

@anothercomposer7118

22 күн бұрын

Ooohhh, like the masterpiece that is the HBO show.

One of the things Tarantino likes to make fun of is people overanalyzing his movies. He would love this Video.

The Bear Jew was intended to be Adam Sandler, but he was unavailable. Certainly would have put an extra twist for the veiwing audience.

word-salad video about popular movie is also popular

Good analysis. Clickbait title.

And yet.. it doesn't amount to much..

When you realize Tarrantino has made a living out of copying great directors. And their scripts.

@lockekappa500

12 күн бұрын

And doing it better than they did.

@yewtewbstew547

12 күн бұрын

The irony is this comment itself is copied, and yet has never in the history of the internet been followed up by a compelling example. It's a baseless narrative drummed up by people attempting to justify their personal dislike for Tarantino, for reasons unrelated to his films, in a way that they think will be more palatable to people only concerned with his films. Except nobody ever actually buys it.

Been saying this is my favorite Tarantino film and you gave me a greater understanding of why For that I thank you sir 🫡

When he finally quits movie making for good, we're going to look back at him as a genius we didn't fully appreciate or fully understand.....

You are reading way too much into this. And ascribing godlike powers of precognition to Tarantino. But I'm glad u found algorithmic success. And catnip to film snobs is a thing people want. Happy for yah

Bro did you just say the Jewish Bear lmaoooo

I have no idea what this dude just said

@bs-calrissian2023

8 күн бұрын

He said a bunch of obvious, page one film analysys and simple things in an unnecessarily complicated and wannabe intelectual way tbh. These videos are the epidomy of the phrase "It ain't that deep fam"

The bear jew scene would have taken on a whole new perspective if Tarantino got the actor he wanted, Adam Sandler

1:25 "Jubilation".....🤨 Lol

I don't think he's mocking it. I think he's really good at using different perspectives and filming styles along with good story telling.

Great restraint in video runtime. It would’ve been hypocritical to let yourself babel for 21 mins. 14 would be acceptable, earned. 7 is sleek, athletic even.

wait... elcarbon?

Subscribed

good analysis. but I dont think Tarantino thought all of these. if he thought that much he couldnt shoot that many good movies. Shooting movies like riding bicycle for him.

After Jackie Brown, every movie he made was just a glorified excuse to frame violence different ways. And if the argument in this video, which I can hear, is valid and true, then there would be more masterful ways to achieve that goal. To me, he has become a parody of himself. But I'd still hold his 3 first movies dear in my heart, I learned most of my english with them :)