People commenting that this is a wrong comparision should first watch the complete video and understand what it is saying. An absolute beautiful example of check and balances and liveliness of our constitution. The judges are concerned about the aggrieved people in past, present and future.

@Boney.M.

2 жыл бұрын

Comparison of profession is literally dumb. The way the thumbnail is made and the title is wrong and full of immoral advocacy of a profession. There have been cases of corrupt judges too. Just an argument bw both cannot tell if one is supreme. The same bureaucrat might have done wonders in other fields too. Their good work gets hidden due to bureaucratic stereotypes. As far as checks and balances are concerned, its not discretion, it's the responsibility and any officer and office is liable to do the bare minimum. Not doing it will lead to suspension.

@harshitvineetsharma7501

2 жыл бұрын

U may get likes but didn't grasp exactly what happened there. Forget the thumbnail but listen the concern of the judge in purview of a common man.

@lucifer_ias9544

2 жыл бұрын

Admin chutiya hai is channel ka

@rahulbirle5003

2 жыл бұрын

@@Boney.M. agreed brother...and they talk about checks and balances but everyone know how the judges are selected through favours and personal interests by means of collegium system...where is transparency in judge selection process??

For anyone that understands, the matter exposes the fact that the District Magistrate, "in this matter", has been given too much discretion. The DM is not only the head of the selection committee, but he is also the appellate authority to dispose off grievances after allocation of fair shop licenses. In layman's terms, it is like going to a doctor who fails to treat your illness, but, the only solution is, you have you have to go back to the same doctor that couldn't treat you and expect him be able to treat you the second time! It is when so much discretion is allowed to one person, that there is sure to be indiscretion.

@abhilashdubey6725

Жыл бұрын

You hit the nail on the head, Sir!

This is an awesome way to work in larger public interest in harmony between judiciary and executive. Appreciate the h'ble judges for finding solution.. Otherwise some judges behave like kings

@LawChakra

2 жыл бұрын

Indeed

@sridharanvenkatakrishnan4086

2 жыл бұрын

Great observation

@krishnaverma969

2 жыл бұрын

@@sridharanvenkatakrishnan4086 thanks a lot

@1091Matrix

2 жыл бұрын

The same is with in concern of IAS officer because they behave like the good in district where they were placed to serve but all know how they behave

It is very unfortunate we are comparing between a judge and an IAS officer. Both judiciary and executive have specified role and are equally important for democracy. They are both powerful in their respective fields.

@LawChakra

2 жыл бұрын

Listen to the conversation and logical point raised by the h'nble judge. It shows that executive is prone to error and mistakes and to check those judiciary is there.

@LawChakra

2 жыл бұрын

I agree both have their own role and responsibility. Judiciary is supreme across all the democracies in the world.

@AmbikeshVinayak

2 жыл бұрын

Exactly bro you are right. Comparison is totally wrong. Both are very powerful in their Respective field. Separation of powers lies here.. remember it..

@nag7787

2 жыл бұрын

Indian courts are on par with Indian parliament and permanent establishment nothing more then that each have edge in respective fields

@mayanksagar3526

2 жыл бұрын

@@LawChakra Judiciary is only supreme, till the Legislative wants it to be! Remember what Mrs. Indira Gandhi did to the judiciary? Any political party in power can strip SC if they want to! My point is the judiciary enjoys power till the legislature wants it to be.

The Hon'ble Judges and the secretary handled the case very professionally and adequately. The Channel has made an unnecessary provocative clickbait title to attract the viewers. The title of the video and insinuation behind it, certainly lowers the dignity of the court and also of the bureaucratic machinery. The judges do not preside over cases to prove their smartness or to lower anybody's prestige. The remarks by the hon'ble judges must not be construed to be against the Executive or the legislature but must be seen as pursuant to overall Justice. I am very appreciative of the channel's pursuit towards legal awareness among the masses but the clickbait titles of some other videos too (of this channel), concerns me, of the wrong message being conveyed that the courts are working against the government or are dissatisfied with the government. The Hon'ble SC has always made its stand very clear on this. The Judiciary has a neutral standing are not against any other organs of the State.

@LawChakra

2 жыл бұрын

Good point raised. I have taken note of your point.

@ramadevi8767

2 жыл бұрын

Can I have recourse to law, to file a contempt of court, due to this click bait sir

@LawChakra

2 жыл бұрын

@@ramadevi8767 How its a clickbait. You see the argument by the secretary. District collector will hear the appeal. Is it correct. If judicary was not smart enough to point this fault.

@viraltrends8555

2 жыл бұрын

@@LawChakra what a biased , petty and polluted mindset you have … there are 100s of cases of judicial overreach.. stop comparing executives and judiciary.., if u don’t have the guts to create an harmony

@mausamroy779

2 жыл бұрын

@Nexter Biggs thanks for your amazing comment. It really draws a clear analysis of this video.

Good to see a positive debate and course of action of action leading to a possible solution. As far as the comment section. I see judiciary and executive in highest regard. They both have their own jurisdiction and role to play in shaping our nation's future. I'm glad our judiciary and executive despite all that is lacking is functioning well. Jai Hind

@LawChakra

2 жыл бұрын

All parts have separation of jurisdiction

Look how maturely they resolved the matter. This is how the authorities should work. Secretary (IAS) knew the fault but his concern was correct that if someone has not been granted license then every time he will appeal against it. It might create extra burden on the officers who themselves don't have enough time to see every matter.

@saurabhrai5461

2 жыл бұрын

@@VikashKumar-lh6sg That's why the court ordered to give an authority in between to whom a person can appeal back.

@g.kcurrentaffairsadda542

Жыл бұрын

If these people would have work than no one would come to court..

Relating judges and ias., Judiciary and executive is like the one relating theory class and practical applications.,😂

It is not the question of Comparing between Judiciary and The bureaucrats. There are black sheeps in both these positions. Here I salute the Judges for the order after seeing the matter closely.

These 23 years of age IAS officers feel they are the BOSS without any experience !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1

Matter of fact every officer, wether be it an IAS or The Hon'ble Chief Justice's they are all bound by the limitations prescribed in The Constitution itself. Any action or decision that go against the principle of natural justice has to be corrected. Wether be it an IAS or sometimes even the Hon'ble High Court get corrected by The Hon'ble Supreme Court of India. So let there be no comparisons!!

@krishnavaishnav5002

2 жыл бұрын

Nodoubt that the judicery is very powerful...as for as IAS officer is concern they are mostly under pressure of politician ...& very few IAS has knowladge abt LAW...most of the IAS are completely Corrupt...The IAS are behave like they are dictator..where as Judicery treat every people with in the parameter of LAW...my salute to judicery.Jai Hind.

@LawChakra

2 жыл бұрын

But it is also true that executive does go against the rule and in such time judiciary comes as rescue

@souravbehera5875

2 жыл бұрын

@@LawChakra does anyone denying that... ?!.. ... The three pillars .... Are well and equally.... positioned for checking and balancing each other... With accordance to the constitution....

@sahilsetu8069

2 жыл бұрын

@@LawChakra Everything cannot be perfect and as per the model imagined. when the executive implement a law, it is only after its implementation, a number of issues come forward. For this you cannot blame the legislature and the executive. Must note that no one is smarter. The smartness is only in performing your duty. Don't waste time in pitty comparisons. What a IAS is capable of, a judge can never do. And what a judge is capable of, an IAS can never do it. There are cases numerous cases of judicial activism as well. Absolute power corrupts absolutely be it a Judge or a IAS or IPS or a minister.

@sahilsetu8069

2 жыл бұрын

@@LawChakra This is really immature from people of LAw like you to put videos of such sort😫😫

Such a kind IAS officer 😍

This judge is very specific to clear the ambiguity and the loopholes of the system.👍

@LawChakra

2 жыл бұрын

It shows how smart judges are

This is by far one of the funniest goof up ever !!!

My lord, prayers these are such words which no judge wants to discontinue but they want to improve everyone

@surajkumar-nk9oq

2 жыл бұрын

These words remind of kings, prince..

Nice video proceeding. Informative. The clash between interpreting & implementing provisions of Law is fascinating

@LawChakra

2 жыл бұрын

Thanks for the feedback. Support the channel

Its good to see lot of discussion on this topic. Indian constitution is based on separation of power among judciiary, executive and legislature. These 3 together put check on each others power. In this video the h'nble judge was smart enough to raise the issue in the act that District collector sitting in the selection panel can't hear the appeal against the selection. How can I select and hear appeal against my own selection decision. We all need judiciary being efficient to fight against the excesses of the executive and legislature.

@harshitvineetsharma7501

2 жыл бұрын

Exactly

@abhinavdw1

Жыл бұрын

Just like honorable chief justice ranjan gogoi became judge against his own harassment case.

Both are equally educated and qualified in their field, don't compare them.

@ramjhasahab9923

2 жыл бұрын

Secretary is nowhere close to judges

@Auditkafunda

2 жыл бұрын

Abey judge he wo... Jubaan se pocha lagaywaayega.... Faad dega...

@Andbhaktkabap1

2 жыл бұрын

@@Auditkafunda judge...ek bar nikal na....up me dekha..nahi...kete pita tha judge ko...

@Auditkafunda

2 жыл бұрын

@@Andbhaktkabap1 duur boka choda

Point raised by the HC is very valid n Secretary is not able to understand the crux. Person agrieved by the decision of selection committee has not forum to appeal. Collecor being head of selection committee can not be appeallate authority for decision of selection committee. Very interesting..

@LawChakra

2 жыл бұрын

Correct

@asitkshukla

2 жыл бұрын

Either the secretary is Dumb or he doesn't wants to accept his mistake in framing rules.

@ANIK5261

2 жыл бұрын

Its loophole ;) should be fixed by issuing new gr

I didn't understand anything but its fascinating and thrilling to watch 😂

I have seen lawyers in my family and they are very respectful towards each profession . be it IAS , Judiciary, Clerk , Whatsoever. But see this Dubey ji ka firm , the title he used is not good. No one is smarter. They are bound in a way or the other. India has good lawyers but rare. mostly lawyers tend to live the stardom of judges by just boasting about them. Saddened

Abhi tk to main IAS banne ki soch raha tha pr ab judge banunga 🤣

@abhinavkumar8316

2 жыл бұрын

hahahahahahaha....

@surajkumar-nk9oq

Жыл бұрын

High court ya supreme court judge banna lagbhag namumkin hoga.. Collegium system ke baare me jaan lo

Both are mature enough to resolve the matter quite easily. Both listened to eath other. Please don't try to cause a rift between the two professions

Nobody is smarter, it's is the power, greatest justification of smartness.

@LawChakra

2 жыл бұрын

Absolutely.

4 fingers dikha k, the judge is saying, "there are 3 types of orders" @6:10

@LawChakra

2 жыл бұрын

Good catch. Thanks for watching.

@SaLim_Saifi0143

2 жыл бұрын

🤣🤣 उम्र हो गई ताऊ की

What I got from this video is that honourable judges are doing commendable job in clearing out the loopholes in the rules while Mr sect. Is trying to defend

Ias officers may have diverse academic backgrounds:- engineering, medical, legal, humanities and so on... Judges may have generally legal academic background..

@surajkumar-nk9oq

2 жыл бұрын

Engineering in itself is so diverse..

@20vivekpandey

2 жыл бұрын

Ur wrong....I'm enginner...I'm LLB and LLM.....MA in public administration

@jakyc.wangsaham1414

2 жыл бұрын

IAS/civil servant is generalist/ jack of All but master of none.... ...

@LawChakra

2 жыл бұрын

Completely agree.

@LawChakra

2 жыл бұрын

good to see all these qualities in a single person. Keep watching.

This is precisely what honourable CJI had highlighted in the minister’s address in the presence of PMO that a major burden over 60% of pendency of cases in courts emanates from bad legislation or poor execution of government orders

1 min silence for those whose thoughts u turned for UPSC 🤣

@bharat..n8743

Жыл бұрын

🤣😅😂

I request to channel's team please upload vdo with subtitle b.coz we are come from here for watch the all vdo and understand everything if you are upload vdo with subtitle we are understan very well so

In general people have more trust & respect for the Judges and the lawyers than the administrators. Exceptions exist in every field.

really the honorable justices are way smarter than that man..haha

The honorable judges got the fault in the clause in a minute...very surprising that the secretary couldn't see the difference between the clause and the issue at hand despite having so many lawyers at his disposal.....also the maturity with which both sides handled the issue shows the power of indian democratic system ...

@theexposer9483

2 жыл бұрын

Do you believe that IAS doesn’t know the issue. When a common man can understand, how come this fellow who became IAS only buy his academic knowledge does not understand. The issue here or in any similar case is same, who cares, our salary, position, power, promotion etc are assured. We are superior class in the society born to be rule Indian peasants after British in india. The design of whole executive wing in india is to dislodge, deny, evade, refuse, delay, deprive rights of Indian people and this is done by a structure called licensing, approvals, applications, procedure, system etc.etc. In the end the aggrieved lands in court where it takes another 15 years to get remedy. The world had already moved on by that time. The misery of Indians continue. This is the real design of these two pillars of democracy in india.

@saurabhrai5461

2 жыл бұрын

He knew the fault but his concern was correct that if someone has not been granted license then every time he will appeal against it. It might create extra burden on the officers who themselves don't have enough time to see every matter.

Judiciary ❤️ made valid facts in this matter 👌

It is well settled that every justification of the Court in the interest of justice. The Court pleased to know from the state that to which authority concerned the aggrieved person will approach. The govt. of Bihar make it clear so that the aggrieved person will approach them. If there is no appellate authority the aggrieved person ultimately approach the High court in order to get the justice. Justice should not only be done but manifestly and undoubtedly be seen to be done. Creating impediment in the smooth functioning of administration of justice is contemptuous act..

@LawChakra

2 жыл бұрын

Here we can see how logcial indian judciary is.

@ggfg8570

2 жыл бұрын

The problem lies with the State Govt. In such orders the Govt. should have consulted the legal department prior to notification of orders. In case of doubt the legal dept. could have come to the rescue of the department in question which issued orders.

@gusneverdied

2 жыл бұрын

@@LawChakra Yes absolutely. Yesterday, Maharashtra HC released a pedophile. It was pretty logical I guess.

@gusneverdied

2 жыл бұрын

@@LawChakra Few months back, some high court also said that Marital Rape is not rape.

How can someone be the appellate authority against the dispute emanating from the decision taken by him or her? The Judges are right. Finally the IAS Babu has understood.

@LawChakra

2 жыл бұрын

against the principle of justice

None is above law. Justice is justice. Comparision is another thing. Jay hind. 🙏

Lordships ending statements was classic

@LawChakra

2 жыл бұрын

This shows the judge is very smart

What my friend mr.mohit Kumar said in his comment is correct and agreeable.

@LawChakra

2 жыл бұрын

Indeed. You are absolutely correct.

A classic!!!! Excellent

@LawChakra

2 жыл бұрын

Thanks for watching

Judge is more powerful than IAS. A judge can terminate IAS title.. but a IAS can't 😂😂

@LawChakra

2 жыл бұрын

Correct

@gkanonymous7080

2 жыл бұрын

Ganta judge kuch nhi kar sakta pm ke alawa koi terminate nhi kar sakta.

@tushark4850

2 жыл бұрын

read constitution, recruitment rules, and Law then comment here

@gkanonymous7080

2 жыл бұрын

@@tushark4850 judge reinstate kar sakta hai remove nhi..agar tumhe pata hai toh ek ias officer ka example do jisko judge hata diya ho....

@prajaram1918

2 жыл бұрын

@@tushark4850 Law says a judge give orders to remove an IAS. And president can follow the order. 😂 Hence IAS got no power

Both have their roles in society. Do you know how many subjects an IAS officer has to go through? He is not some uneducated minister. Looks like you are looking for masala movie in the courtroom.

@LawChakra

2 жыл бұрын

Absolutely.

@kris1842

2 жыл бұрын

judiciary is more powerful practically. Now start preparing for judicial service😂😂

@wildadventure-ro4qb

2 жыл бұрын

Bro just go through law books and the books which the civil aspirants have to read , me also preparing for upsc. I find that it's too tough to crack judiciary , to crack judiciary I have to go through 130+ books while for upsc at least 50

@wildadventure-ro4qb

2 жыл бұрын

Once try to understand bare act language you will agree

@albertdebbarma2620

2 жыл бұрын

Ask any law student you know how much subjects do they study?

oh dubey ji, kuch kaam dhanda nahi hai kya ? 🤣🤣🤣

Enriching discussion

Ek number selection process chal rha hai khud ke rules govt nhi samjh paa rhi 😂

I wish I belong to Bihar domicile. the way these judgements delivered, they are setting a great examples of how things should work.

@LawChakra

2 жыл бұрын

This video was an eye opener for us too.

Judges are not jumped out of sky. Judges are behaving with headweight

Forget the idea, just answer the question 😁

High court judge have the powers to make CM stand infront of him.

@LawChakra

2 жыл бұрын

Right. He has that much power

@anshumananimesh2213

2 жыл бұрын

HC of Allahabad removed Indira Gandhi from the post of PM

@LawChakra

2 жыл бұрын

@@anshumananimesh2213 HC judges have same power as Supreme court judges in 99% of scenarios

Its about following the rules & guidelines and clear boundaries. Both professionals should follow the rules, but in reality people twist the rules to suit their own benefits. Unfortunately 99% of IAS officers in India today are corrupt. Judges are supposed to be unbiased to settle disputes. The general practice is powerful ppl keep on carrying out unjust practices. Whenever once in a blue moon "Justice" occurs, it's like a festival.

outside the court upsc qualifier think that they are very powerful and they feel very proud for themselves bt inside court he is jst like a normal man... court is showing here that law is equal for every one

Sir district court jadge ki P.A ki salary kitni hoti h minimum aur maximum aur ye job government Hoti hai ya private please please sir btaiye 🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏

Forget the idea answer the question 😂😂

the judges doesn’t even allowed to speak the DM.

The IAS officer has been spared from the dress code reprimand. Hon. Judges were obviously piqued at the lackadaisical approach of the government and executives to put in place a redressal mechanism.

Profession se smartness ka koi relation nhi hota so it’s illogical to compare anybodys intelligence on basis of profession…eg a nurse who is working in a hospital has way more knowledge than a fresh MBBS doctor

@LawChakra

2 жыл бұрын

Agree but in this specific case the judge interpreted the law correctly

@prankurgaurav6839

2 жыл бұрын

@@LawChakra cuz it’s his job to interpret the law correctly…unhone ussi ki toh kitabe pdhi hai not the IAS so that’s why it is illogical comparison…judge judicial system me hai ias executive me toh comparison doesn’t make sense right ye bolrha mai

@LawChakra

2 жыл бұрын

@@prankurgaurav6839 Good

Why @Dubey & Associates Law firm is allowed to upload it to youtube if the live telecast is allowed is there any norms to telecast it later for any specific channel

@LawChakra

2 жыл бұрын

It is allowed

Lawyer :hold my beer 😁 Judges are nothing in front of lawyers

@mka2032

2 жыл бұрын

@Yash Sharma sad reality, Look at the lawyers of mudrer, rapist Judges look fool in front cunning lawyers

@abhinavdw1

Жыл бұрын

Koi bada tagda lawyer ho tbie

Basic tenet of law is that any person who is aggrieved by an action of the government may approach the competent authority (or appellate authority) or if no remedy in law is available then Hon'ble Courts. Since there is no appellate authority if a person is aggrieved by selection, the petitioner has approached the Hon'ble High Court.

@LawChakra

2 жыл бұрын

Correct

@asdf369

2 жыл бұрын

Kya aap meri ek help kr skti hai ? I am from Delhi , aur maine apne driving license me name correction ke liye apply kiya tha , maine 22 February 2022 ko apply kiya tha , lekin abhi tak unhone mera name change kiya ,jab maine apply kiya tha , tab name correction ke liye sbhi ki fee A authority me kat ti thi , lekin ab sbhi ki fee apni apni authorities me kat ti hai , To meri authority B hai . To jab mai vha pe gya , to unlogo ne mujhe B authority me jaane ke liye bola , Jab mai B me gya tab DTO ne mujhse gusse me baat ki aur vapas A authority me bhej diya , Maine A vaalo ko ye baat btayi , lekin unhone bola hum nhi kr skte , Ye B me hoga ab. Special case ( maine aur mere ek friend ne sab kuch ek jaisa , ek saath apply kiya tha ( uski bhi same name correction vali problem thi ) . Lekin uska aaa gya aur mera nhi aya , maine unko btaya bhi , lekin unhone fir bhi mna krdiya , even uss A authority ke inspector ne mere gazette vaale documents pe objection lga diya ( jo 2 mahine pehle hi verify ho gya tha ) . To maine unse kaha ki agr isme koi galti thi , to tumne ise verify hi kyu kiya tha , unhone kuch jwab nhi diya , unhone kaha koi baat nhi dubara upload krdo , maine kaha nhi mai nhi krunga , maine isme glti btao glti kya hai , unhone kaha glti to kuch nhi hai , thik hai , for bhi maine apna kaam jldi karane ke liye dubara upload kr diya...bcz maine Delhi polike form fill krne hai . Lekin abi bhi vo log mera license me name correction approve nhi kr rhe hai , mere sbhi documents bilkup thik aur complete hai , Each and every document. Lekin fir bhi vo log aisa krte hai , mere 7 baar vha pe jaa chuka hu . Aur vo bhot saare logo ke saath yhi krte hai , maine khud dekha hai aur logo vaha pareshani me. ) So main abhi kya kr skta hu apna kaam pura karane ke liye ? 🙄

@asdf369

2 жыл бұрын

Even mai abhi itna frustrated ho chuka hu , ke unme se kisi ek ko vaha se utha kr , unn शीशे ki khidkiyo se बाहर faik du ♥️

@AdvRituRajkumari

2 жыл бұрын

@@asdf369 Twitter pe tweet kiya hai yeh problem? warna ek legal notice bhejna hoga.

Wow!! Salute to Judges..

@LawChakra

2 жыл бұрын

Yes

In Australia judges are never concerned about aggrieved people. India is 100 times better.

Arre Secretary is also correct because in India every second applicant whose name is not finalized by committee go for remedy, for satisfying the person it will also take a lot of time. And due to this work has been hampered. However this makes executives extra power which is not good.

@LawChakra

2 жыл бұрын

correct.

@vikas4u07

2 жыл бұрын

Acha. So 1 % concept

@munishmahajan002

2 жыл бұрын

@@vikas4u07 it's not one percent concept. It happens everywhere literally and every time at renewal or when new licenses may be applied. Secretary or DM s or commissioners don't have ample of time for just one thing esp. DM. They have a lots of other works. I am in Delhi and I know the work culture. Experienced so I know.

It would have been much easier to understand if you had explained the context of the hearing.

There has always been the tendency of the judiciary to impose itself on the other pillars of democracy and prove itself superior but the separation of powers does not give special powers to the judiciary but only the ability to take suo motu cognizance in special circumstances and the power to direct the government for decisions taken by it in extra-constitional matters.

@LawChakra

2 жыл бұрын

All should work in harmony with each other.

I see a lot of people are not approved of the tagline you have put in your video description ( the comparison).I don't see anything wrong in that because the secy inspite of knowing the loopholes in that order was defending it. Now, smart people don't do that, they accept the fallacy and work on it. Some would say, there are loopholes in every policy, I just question, why there would be any ?? A person of that stature and position (secretary) who seems to be well qualified for analysing the positives and negatives of a policy is not aware of the loophole, the judge highlighted !!! That's a joke...So, kudos to the honourable judge who corrected the respected secy...And yes, love the tag line....

@LawChakra

2 жыл бұрын

Thanks for supporting. I loved the way h'nble judges went about the case.

By which application you recorded this video? I also looking for good recording app. Please reply

@LawChakra

2 жыл бұрын

Thanks for watching.

@LawChakra

2 жыл бұрын

It is adobe pro

The inherent limitation of lack of innovation in bureaucracy also one of the reasons for not getting the work done on time. That is also one of the reasons for bringing headache to Judiciary.

There is no point of saying that hc judge is smarter than secy. They r just discussing solution.. Even judges are saying that secy's personal appearance has resolved things to a greater extend.. It looks like secy has to do in his hands,court is just discussing and suggesting.

@2020soumya

2 жыл бұрын

And that's why the judge got a bit smarter than the secy because the secy inspite of knowing the loopholes was defending himself and the judge was correcting that. 😀

It's great to note that English is preferred language in courts. We need to understand hindi is only for Hindi-stani not every India

@mobjectivems7652

2 жыл бұрын

No need…wtf are you talking about. Hindi is not the national language.

@lawnorder2709

2 жыл бұрын

@@mobjectivems7652 hindi is official language not nastional language. True. English shd be preferred in Entire india

Both shared their concern, and interpretation could be slight varied, thats what the matter of concern in this video, but it ended with solution , that is brain storming

@LawChakra

2 жыл бұрын

Good

Is this a court in United Kingdom or in India ?? Why can't proceeding take place in Hindi or any local language ??

Judiciary executive and legislature are separate field. Every one is boss on their respective field in these three field.

There should not be any comparison. It is the beauty of our constitution.

Judges wanna to show their seniority but in really situation secretary is not a mere position

@LawChakra

2 жыл бұрын

I agree. But in general judiciary is kept at higher pedestal.

@subratashome6393

2 жыл бұрын

What did u really want to say Judiciary is the watchdog of Executive.

@uma4700

2 жыл бұрын

@@subratashome6393 what is your judiciary system already known in bollywood movies🎥 no need to explain it

@fieldagent7170

2 жыл бұрын

@@uma4700 you consider bollywood movies as reflection of reality?

@astonmartin2158

2 жыл бұрын

@@fieldagent7170 indeed. If not we wouldn't have lakhs of cases pending till date.

Does anybody know the case number or name of this case

Every job is equally important and must be respected but in a democracy, the most powerful is the legislative followed by the judiciary and then the executive.

@LawChakra

2 жыл бұрын

Thanks for watching

Kindly provide CNR in description.

Rather than getting into discussion about what their powers are,its better assesing what their duties and responsibilities are...

लोकतंत्र की खूबसूरती यही है, काले कोर्ट में जज साहब बिना पुलिस के प्रधानमंत्री तक को सजा दे सकते हैं।

@shauryainvestor4350

2 жыл бұрын

@BILAUTA BILLA🐱 saza to dena hi hoga executive ko. Isi ko to loktantra kahte h agar saza accept nhi kiya pm ne to wo fir tanashahi ho jayegi and india ki public tanashah pasand nhi krti. Vidroh ho jayega

@shauryainvestor4350

2 жыл бұрын

@BILAUTA BILLA🐱 clean chit, bail ye sb dena court ka kaam h Agar nhi dega to jail m hi Rah jayega. India m pm tak ko saza hui h पॉलिटीशियन ka kya . Aur bht log to jurm karke v saza nhi paa rhe kyuki court v saboot maangta h

@shauryainvestor4350

2 жыл бұрын

@BILAUTA BILLA🐱 kisi ko saza dilwana advocate pr depend krta h

It's verysimple to resolve this issue.why unnecessarily waste time.The Secretary is very apt in resolving the issue within a few weeks

Both are strong but situation makes the change

IAS or IAS aspirant dono ko jamin pe rahna chahiye

Judge Sahab yeh batao ki summer vacati9n kyun hoyee hain court mein. Student ho kya aap?

Really our judge rock

This is transparent debate is going on which influnce positive on students and citizen of india ,Citizens will try to always go through court in any perspective case with blindbelieve !

@LawChakra

2 жыл бұрын

Yes it will have an impact

To resolve any matter the complaint should be placed to the bigger seat than the head of the committee,that's what the honorable judges are telling

It's a healthy disagreement

Honourable court is showing 4 fingers and saying 3 Point to be noted my lord😋😂

@LawChakra

2 жыл бұрын

Right and funny too

Tabhi to itne case pending chl rhe h.. Court m jao to hmesha chutti pr hi milege

Ias secretary law bnate hai aur legislature usse pas krte h aur judiciary uspe kaam krti h To smartness me barabar bhut du r ki baat h . Ek senior ias pura desh chla rhe hai.aur justice keval judiciary with neary 5 crore pending case .it clearly mean that they even can not run judiciary without ias. Ha judiciary ko kidi bhut h legislature me aur executive me ghusne ki . Suo moto se lekr judicial activism tk Bhut se example hai.

@LawChakra

2 жыл бұрын

Both are at fault at times and both do good work at times. So this happens.

Conflict of interest...in simple terms

Well said forget d idea

The matter is so simple on which an officer of secretary cadre looks to the court though the government is capable of taking suitable action. This how many cases go to courts due to the incompetence of bureaucracy.

@LawChakra

2 жыл бұрын

Right

@AbhiSingh-qr1li

2 жыл бұрын

carores of cases pending

I see many comments comparing the Secy and the Judge. Not even the Cabinet Secy is on the level of a High Court Judge.

The work of judiciary is to maintain check balances

Can someone kindly summaries the whole topic in a simpler terms.

Smartness dont come from profession its comes from personality

No one is above constitution whether it's PM,CM,IAS,IPS,MP etc......

@nikeshmali8506

2 жыл бұрын

Do you know PM can change constitution

@NareshCK001

2 жыл бұрын

@@nikeshmali8506 how?

@nikeshmali8506

2 жыл бұрын

@@NareshCK001 Indira Gandhi did ones, forgot?

@NareshCK001

2 жыл бұрын

@@nikeshmali8506 i don't know bro. Please can u elaborate? I eager to know.

@nikeshmali8506

2 жыл бұрын

@@NareshCK001 that's sweet, but it's long topic to discuss, so better you research and so that you will know a lot. Pls seek information over internet and learn how things work, who do what work, how new rules and added and how old rules are removed.

In front of Judges Judgement all are normal weather it a IAS or IPS. Superior is Judge

@LawChakra

2 жыл бұрын

Correct

Recently 1)Mr Nitin Gadkari said he was amazed by the response of an IAS officer concerning a bridge collapse in sultanganj. 2) Supreme Court Judge rejected the death penalty of the ®apist and mu®derer of a 4-year-old girl. These 2 are the most prestigious post in India so nothing can say about anyone.