When did Egyptians stop being able to read hieroglyphs? And why?

Egyptian Hieroglyphs are one of the most well known writing systems from the ancient world, and they were employed for over three thousand years, from the Old Kingdom period through the Roman era. Now, though, they are no longer used as a script. So when, and why, did they die out?
SOURCES:
The Final Pagan Generation, Watts
The Rise of Western Christendom, Brown
The Oxford Handbook of Roman Egypt, Riggs

Пікірлер: 260

  • @TheFallofRome
    @TheFallofRomeАй бұрын

    Correction: “Hieroglyphs” is the actual term, not “Hieroglyphics”, which is a collection of hieroglyphs. Did not catch that while doing the editing. Apologies everyone

  • @M3nacria

    @M3nacria

    Ай бұрын

    FYI the red box around the text in the thumbnail makes it look like I already partially watched this video, since it's in the bottom left where the red progress bar goes. Nearly overlooked this video.

  • @deiansalazar140

    @deiansalazar140

    Ай бұрын

    @AncientEgyptAndTheBible has entered the chat(David Falk).

  • @MogofWar

    @MogofWar

    Ай бұрын

    To be fair, people have also generally used Hieroglyphics to refer to the script system itself, whether or not this is actually technically correct.

  • @Svensk7119

    @Svensk7119

    Ай бұрын

    You mentioned your own error. Well done, sir! For the record, "hieroglyphs" are the symbols, and the language. "Hieroglyphics" are the characteristics of said characters and language. Simply put, the first is the noun, the second, the adjective.

  • @xoxb2
    @xoxb2Ай бұрын

    A history channel with a real-life narrator! Thank you for not being a machine.

  • @VeteranExpat

    @VeteranExpat

    Ай бұрын

    Most of those are Chinese propaganda trying to rewrite history incrementally.

  • @DevinDTV

    @DevinDTV

    Ай бұрын

    what kind of stupid channels are you watching where having a human narrate is worthy of mention?

  • @iowa_don

    @iowa_don

    Ай бұрын

    Check out toldinstone as well. Really like that guy.

  • @lococomrade3488

    @lococomrade3488

    Ай бұрын

    *World of Antiquity*

  • @kenneybis1097

    @kenneybis1097

    Ай бұрын

    Dam Skynet, the machine revolution is almost upon us.

  • @cal2127
    @cal2127Ай бұрын

    its wild that the whole reason we know how to read heiroglyphics is because some soldier was like "huh cool rock"

  • @maxsonthonax1020

    @maxsonthonax1020

    Ай бұрын

    Hmm.

  • @michaelpineiro533

    @michaelpineiro533

    Ай бұрын

    'Bro, I bet that rock would fit _perfect_ in that hole in the wall!'

  • @fromabove422

    @fromabove422

    Ай бұрын

    Only a fool would believe that story. Just like the dead sea scroll story. I don't know why us normal people think we're so important 😂

  • @azlanadil3646

    @azlanadil3646

    Ай бұрын

    @@fromabove422 What’s the *real* story?

  • @fromabove422

    @fromabove422

    Ай бұрын

    @@azlanadil3646 none of the publics business. Keep fooling yourselves thinking people who control information owe you the truth. Idk did we just start having "fake news"

  • @reginaldbauer5243
    @reginaldbauer5243Ай бұрын

    Egyptian Hieroglyphs are part of a complex writing system, where most signs have more than one possible reading, dependent on context (similarly to the Japanese Kanji characters). Signs could have both a phonetic (single consonant or syllable) value or an ideogrammatic (word) reading, but could even be utilized as phonetic complements or logograms (a written character that represents a word or phrase, like in Chinese), “reinforcing” the reading of words they were attached to. As many of these duplicities could only be interpreted by a native speaker of Old Egyptian, this system was very difficult to utilize for speakers of foreign languages. Hieroglyphs can be tricky because even through they look like pictures, most of the time the meaning of the sign is not the same as the thing pictured. It is a mixed script - some signs are alphabetic, like the letters in our alphabet. Other signs make a group of sounds, like a syllable. Still other signs are an entire word. Occasionally the same hieroglyph can do all three things. And sometimes, hieroglyphs aren’t pronounced at all - these are called ‘determinatives’, and they sit at the end of a word to give us a clue to the meaning of that word. Also, the Egyptian system had over 800 different signs, which is an extremely large inventory of symbols.

  • @jstantongood5474

    @jstantongood5474

    Ай бұрын

    I’d be quite happy with only 800 😅 Japanese has 2200 in common use, Chinese 7000 for proficiency and tens of thousands of archaic and alternative forms.

  • @ikengaspirit3063

    @ikengaspirit3063

    Ай бұрын

    Why would that phonetic and logographic component be a draw back to speakers of other languages?. Like you compare it to Chinese in that aspect but in Chinese, that it can be ready logographically and phonetically is why it can be ready by people speaking a different language and can be modified without making new characters, when it moves to new areas like Vietnam. So why isn't that logographic, phonetic characteristic an advantage like it was for Chinese?.

  • @ericponce8740

    @ericponce8740

    Ай бұрын

    And when the Muslims conquered Egypt in 640 A.D. from the Romans, the Arabic language would take over as the official language of that area.

  • @sktrsh6951

    @sktrsh6951

    Ай бұрын

    ⁠@@ericponce8740that is false because egyptian was already replaced by latin and greek as official language and the main language in the cities. However, egyptian in the form of coptic continued to exist until around 19th century when it died out from daily use but still remains as a language of the coptic church

  • @therat1117

    @therat1117

    Ай бұрын

    @@ikengaspirit3063 The Egyptian script that spread outside of Egypt was greatly simplified. Early Semitic speakers who evidently understood Hieroglyphs to some extent and spoke Egyptian copied what the Egyptians were doing with Hieratic at the time, and created an abjad out of Hieroglyphic signs. However, they assigned phonetic values in the very early Semitic language of the Sinai (probably ancestral to modern Arabic but still likely comprehensible to Caananite speakers), since they understood that for Hieroglyphs (and Hieratic), picture = first sound in word that describes the picture. So the 'house' Hieroglyph with the value 'pr' became the letter 'b' in Proto-Sinaitic writing, because the Semitic word for 'house' was 'bajt'. This Proto-Sinaitic alphabet then spread outside of Egypt, with Hieratic also spreading a little bit in its simplified form. Because Hieroglyphs were only ever used in monumental inscriptions and priestly writing by the Late Bronze Age, their usage became stagnant compared to the Hieratic (later Demotic) script for writing Egyptian, and the Sinaitic script, whose descents went on to become the dominant scripts used over the entirety of Afro-Eurasia west of the Hindu Kush mountains.

  • @jstantongood5474
    @jstantongood5474Ай бұрын

    My hat off this man. I am usually hard to impress and have lived in Rome for a very long time. THIS was an excellent overview and filled quite a few lacunae I had. Thank you so much.

  • @bartsanders1553
    @bartsanders1553Ай бұрын

    I really shocked that they lasted 350 years after Cleopatra. I had assumed that the Ptolemaic Dynasty would have weened society towards Greek. Shows what I know.

  • @arhexirthewistful5891

    @arhexirthewistful5891

    Ай бұрын

    The Ptolemaioi ruled Egypt like a plantation.

  • @stoferb876

    @stoferb876

    Ай бұрын

    That would have meant creating huge turmoil (rebellions and widespread dissatisfaction) for no apparent gain. Egyptian temples and the Egyptian sort of 'state clergy' had been the administration for the country since forever, and it was a very functional well-oiled machine that the Persians and Greeks and later Romans saw no reason to get rid of. It helped them govern the land, get their taxes and keep the population relatively content and obedient. It's one of the reason Augustus took over Egypt as a personal kingdom and became 'Pharao', since to make it a regular roman province would have meant loosing this for him amazing administrative organization.

  • @johnbennett757

    @johnbennett757

    Ай бұрын

    Ptolemaic Dynasty had ruled in Egypt for close to 300 years. They had absorbed many Egyptian ideas and it was important to them to present an Egyptian face to the native population that lived outside of the multi-cultural city of Alexandria. Alexandria was the most important city of the Eastern Mediterranean. By the way it had the largest Jewish population of any city . It was probably the also the largest Greek city in the world also. The Ptolemaic's were probably skilled at appeasing all for the various ethnic and religious factions.

  • @bartsanders1553

    @bartsanders1553

    Ай бұрын

    My assumptions come from what happened to Anglo-Saxon England after the Norman Conquest. The was a slow change in language, though obviously the gulf between the cultures was far narrower, physically and metaphysically.

  • @Rynewulf

    @Rynewulf

    Ай бұрын

    Yeah despite how pop culture depicts them, from day 1 the Ptolemies pretty much went native. It was a large, populous and rich country and trying to enforce a language and culture change would have been extremely challenging. Instead the Ptolemies and their Greek speaking new military aristocracy did the simple thing and kept up Greek customs in private, but used Egyptian ones when dealing with the people at large. So Egyptian temple building, religion, art, writing. The syncretic synthesis occurred because of adapting these things through the new Hellenistic lens in private and in the royal court (as private as a royal family gets). The whole multiple aspects gods was normal for Egypt, and interpreting foreign gods as cultural variants of the Olympians was normal for Greeks hence Hermanubis and Harpocrates (Serapis was native, Osiris and Apis combined). This is also how the Coptic language formed, through elite and international Greek influence bleeding through to common Egyptian Demotic

  • @FrancisFjordCupola
    @FrancisFjordCupolaАй бұрын

    This is the sort of content for which I love KZread. Thank you, great video!

  • @kaeruo519
    @kaeruo519Ай бұрын

    slight error at 8:34: the temple of Philae was closed by emperor Justinian in 535 not 435 CE.

  • @jstantongood5474

    @jstantongood5474

    Ай бұрын

    You have a good eye for day. Yes and logical. Justinian wasn’t born yet in the early 5th century.

  • @kristiangustafson4130

    @kristiangustafson4130

    Ай бұрын

    @@jstantongood5474 537. Procopius Bell. Pers. 1.19.37

  • @tulthor2967

    @tulthor2967

    Ай бұрын

    CE, you mean, AD

  • @kaeruo519

    @kaeruo519

    Ай бұрын

    @@tulthor2967 no, I‘m not a christian, I precisely meant, what I wrote!

  • @tulthor2967

    @tulthor2967

    Ай бұрын

    @@kaeruo519 yes my friend, I am not a Cristian either, but the years that were calculated by our Christian ancestors ( at least in my case ), were calculated after the presumed birth of the Christian God. If the nice, christian- hating gentlemen, that changed this word construction, were that bright, why didn't they invent their own hooish historic timeline, and call it after Moses, or whatever? If you are a former christian, and use this blasphemy, you are just low iq. If you were born in another culture, then use your own fckn timeline. This timeline was invented by christians. It's like saying, I don't say arabic numbers, because I am not an arab, I call them universal numbers. Purely rtrdd

  • @LordWyatt
    @LordWyattАй бұрын

    Thank you for answering my question so clearly:)

  • @lonwof2105
    @lonwof2105Ай бұрын

    This channel brings up some of the most interesting questions.

  • @danukil7703
    @danukil7703Ай бұрын

    Thank you for all your very educational videos :)

  • @sunrisesparkle6363
    @sunrisesparkle6363Ай бұрын

    Syncretism of romano-egyptial culture could probably be the video of its own too. Because that is a really interesting topic.

  • @Rynewulf

    @Rynewulf

    Ай бұрын

    The realistic Roman art style on the very Egyptian decorated tombs during the Roman period are a beautiful synthesis

  • @tonnywildweasel8138
    @tonnywildweasel8138Ай бұрын

    Now that is an interesting question! And a great answer 👍 Any day I learn something new, is a good day. Thank you very much, and greetings from the Netherlands 🇳🇱, TW.

  • @robertsansone1680
    @robertsansone1680Ай бұрын

    Interesting. Very interesting. Thank You. You have answered several questions.

  • @Nylon_riot
    @Nylon_riotАй бұрын

    That relief at 1:50 is so beautiful and detailed.

  • @stupidminotaur9735
    @stupidminotaur9735Ай бұрын

    Very good video. thats a thing i didnt think of before to look up. 5centurary cool. when i visited a museum a decade ago they had a section where you could stamp out each letter for your name? Do you know if there's any culture/prideful revision/use of it in modern Egypt? And any modern reading of it. probably for tourism if it is used.

  • @dariogutierrez6716
    @dariogutierrez6716Ай бұрын

    Extremely interesting topic.

  • @gudea5207
    @gudea5207Ай бұрын

    I don’t know if there is an issue of semantics I’m not understanding but I’m pretty sure hieroglyphs are attested well before the reign of Seth-Peribsen as we clearly have contemporarily attested names of Pharaohs as far back as Narmer and short ivory tags from abydos dating back to possibly 3400 BC.

  • @BS-vx8dg
    @BS-vx8dgАй бұрын

    Wow, I really learned a lot from this! I wish you had a SuperThanks tag enabled so I could drop you a few bucks.

  • @Matlacha_Painter
    @Matlacha_PainterАй бұрын

    Fascinating. Captivating. Brilliantly written and superbly articulated with actual human inflection . I think he’s real ! ;)

  • @rafaelramos1486
    @rafaelramos1486Ай бұрын

    A very interesting video

  • @bruce-le-smith
    @bruce-le-smithАй бұрын

    the older I get the more I worry about these long term declines in quality of administration, due to economic difficulties. I mean in the long term humanity is still up, but I'd hate to get caught in one of the down turn periods where people didn't enjoy as much comfort as their ancestors

  • @danfurtado9158

    @danfurtado9158

    Ай бұрын

    We are already there big bro

  • @philomelodia
    @philomelodiaАй бұрын

    Very interesting video. Extremely informative. One point of correction though, justinian was not the emperor in the year 435. 8:26 That’s 100 years too early for him. Theodosius the second, I believe, was the emperor in 435 A.D.

  • @finnmacdiarmid3250
    @finnmacdiarmid3250Ай бұрын

    Add this to the list of good questions

  • @hokton8555
    @hokton8555Ай бұрын

    could you do the same with cuneiform

  • @deanstuart8871
    @deanstuart8871Ай бұрын

    cool vid

  • @JustinCage56
    @JustinCage56Ай бұрын

    "Who's your favorite Pharaoh?" "Caesar Trajan"

  • @jussikankinen9409
    @jussikankinen9409Ай бұрын

    Why the rock fall off 2cm slices, is it plasted over atone

  • @kristiangustafson4130
    @kristiangustafson4130Ай бұрын

    You've an error at 8:25, as you say the temple at Philae was closed in "435 at the orders of the Emperor Justinian"... but he was not emperor then, it was Theodosius. I think you've got the date wrong, and a quick look tells me it was closed in 537 on Justinian's orders.

  • @KaiHenningsen
    @KaiHenningsenАй бұрын

    Note also that our European alphabetic scripts, Hebrew/Aramaic, Greek, Latin, and Cyrillic *all* directly or indirectly derive from hieroglyphs.

  • @CB-qk8zi

    @CB-qk8zi

    Ай бұрын

    Proof?

  • @Z3nHolEminD

    @Z3nHolEminD

    Ай бұрын

    In Z33 pudding

  • @adrianwebster6923
    @adrianwebster6923Ай бұрын

    What I would love to find is a serious general study of how Egyptian culture and history was understood/misunderstood in the centuries between the loss of understanding and the discovery of the Rosetta Stone. we get some sense with the way Alchemy co-opts the magical aspects, but how else did the successive christian and islamic worlds view Egyptian history and culture? what myths and exotic interpretations did they make based on the limited knowledge they had?

  • @catman8965
    @catman8965Ай бұрын

    VERY GOOD 😊. VERY INFORMATIVE😊

  • @longcastle4863
    @longcastle4863Ай бұрын

    👍 _!!_

  • @Playerone1287
    @Playerone128729 күн бұрын

    Use good microphone or do aome audio modulation because it's hard to follow what you say Please it's a humble request

  • @jussikankinen9409
    @jussikankinen9409Ай бұрын

    What lake is in 24 second

  • @ethancrane3529
    @ethancrane3529Ай бұрын

    First ive seen and heard of roman pharaoh tombs in egypt, its cool to see the monument style of both cultures collide

  • @liyin9194
    @liyin9194Ай бұрын

    It's interesting to speculate if at any point the scribes also suffered from 提笔忘字

  • @JohnSmith-zw8vp
    @JohnSmith-zw8vpАй бұрын

    Is there any realistic chance we could've figured out the hieroglyphs without the Rosetta Stone?

  • @carlthornton3076
    @carlthornton3076Ай бұрын

    Very Good!... #117 {5-15-2024}

  • @oye4511
    @oye4511Ай бұрын

    👏👏

  • @erik9671
    @erik9671Ай бұрын

    I think you are missing an "able" in the title.

  • @jeremiasrobinson

    @jeremiasrobinson

    Ай бұрын

    Stop being to read!

  • @TheFallofRome

    @TheFallofRome

    Ай бұрын

    Thanks for that. All fixed

  • @CHRB-nn6qp
    @CHRB-nn6qpАй бұрын

    When they stopped using them?

  • @j.a.weishaupt1748

    @j.a.weishaupt1748

    Ай бұрын

    Have you watched the video?

  • @user-yd2lg7oe7y
    @user-yd2lg7oe7y25 күн бұрын

    We know exactly because the very last inscription written in a temple gate was found,

  • @deiansalazar140
    @deiansalazar140Ай бұрын

    @AncientEgyptAndTheBible has entered the chat(David Falk).

  • @MariaMartinez-researcher
    @MariaMartinez-researcherАй бұрын

    Thinking in the very last hieroglyphics scribe, without anyone else interested in learning his craft.

  • @SuperSlik50
    @SuperSlik50Ай бұрын

    About 1993

  • @jul1440
    @jul1440Ай бұрын

    I don't think the average Ancient Egyptian ever "read" hieroglyphs. I think it was more ceremonial and decorative (spiritual), a bit like how Japanese emperors speak an archaic form of modern Japanese.

  • @user-jw3vy3kf5f
    @user-jw3vy3kf5f26 күн бұрын

    When they died out?

  • @user-jw3vy3kf5f

    @user-jw3vy3kf5f

    26 күн бұрын

    Ipostulate that today's Egyptians are not decended from the builders of the Pyramids and Sphinx

  • @Acto22
    @Acto2228 күн бұрын

    "Everyone who creates gibberish must know how to read it" Lucius Confucious Biblius 34ad

  • @moracomole8090
    @moracomole8090Ай бұрын

    Because they moved on, same as almost every country in Europe used to use other scripts in the past

  • @tobystewart4403
    @tobystewart4403Ай бұрын

    It is very easy to fall into anachronism when discussing historical linguistics. We commonly assume that all scripts function the same way, that they have the same set of features and functions. For example, there is reference in this video to the "grammar and syntax" of Hieroglyphs. What grammar? What syntax? How do these things operate, in a ideographic script? How do they operate in a logographic script? How do they operate in a syllabaric script, and how do they operate in an alphabet? Here is the thing. There is no grammar, nor syntax, in an ideographic script. Only the author can know the meaning intended by a collection of pictures of things. "Dog sheep eat man." could mean the dog and the man ate the sheep, or it might mean the sheep and the dog ate the man. You can guess, but you cannot know. Even rules based on word order presume a community of folks who share such rules, which was never the case in early shamanistic tribal society. That inherent ambiguity is precisely why logographic scripts evolved. Such languages solved interpretation problems by designating certain words as grammatical functions. This improved them hugely, but was far from enough to make them into something we might consider useful as a language. Just so, the failings of logographic grammar led to syllabaries, and the failings of syllabaries led to alphabets. At each stage, writing became less guesswork, and more precise. In this sense, nobody ever "read" hieroglyphs. They decoded them, slowly and carefully. Further, the reason they stopped being used is because nobody could read them. They could only decode them, slowly and carefully. When something better came along, people changed their ways, because it sucks to suck. If you ever meet someone who claims to be able to "read" sumerian, give them a sample they've never seen before, and tell them to "read" it to you. You'll see how it goes.

  • @dudeinoakland
    @dudeinoaklandАй бұрын

    Short answer: a long time ago

  • @TnT_F0X
    @TnT_F0XАй бұрын

    Ever try to show Cursive to a screen baby?

  • @miketacos9034
    @miketacos9034Ай бұрын

    It’s fascinating how Egyptian religion remained an adversary to Judaism and Christianity for thousands of years, from the time of Pharaoh to the time of the magical charms.

  • @annemurphy9339

    @annemurphy9339

    Ай бұрын

    Much of the occult is still based on ancient Egyptian religion.

  • @wakilahmed5847

    @wakilahmed5847

    Ай бұрын

    @@annemurphy9339nope most of occult is based on Babylonian culture

  • @annemurphy9339

    @annemurphy9339

    Ай бұрын

    @@wakilahmed5847 Much is, but the ancient occult has deep ties to ancient Egypt as well. The story of Isis and Osiris is still an occult belief, and Ancient Egypt is often referred to as the home of the Occult Sciences - magic and demonology, signs & symbols, and magical figures. Imhotep was a magician and priest physician.

  • @kevinmckenzie1990
    @kevinmckenzie199029 күн бұрын

    After the flood for there language was changed

  • @HomeRudeGirlz
    @HomeRudeGirlzАй бұрын

    Ayeeee first!

  • @cinemaipswich4636
    @cinemaipswich4636Ай бұрын

    Those pesky Greek and Roman scribes (there were millions of them) intruded into surrounding cultures and took over.

  • @Fatherofheroesandheroines
    @FatherofheroesandheroinesАй бұрын

    This reminds me of Akkadian. Akkadian was well known well into the Assyrian Empire. If I'm not mistaken once the Neo Babylonian Empire collapsed Akkadian was forgotten.

  • @carlosaugustodinizgarcia3526

    @carlosaugustodinizgarcia3526

    Ай бұрын

    Not at all.For a time the persian emperors still used akkadian in monuments (together with elamite and persian). I

  • @johnsamsungs7570
    @johnsamsungs7570Ай бұрын

    I was surprised that used the word Pagan for the non-Christian's!

  • @maverick7291

    @maverick7291

    Ай бұрын

    Actually the word pagan was just latin word for those that lived in the countryside. That's why we have paisan in Italian and paysan in French, both languages derived from latin.

  • @MarcusAgrippa390
    @MarcusAgrippa390Ай бұрын

    1:31 Um... This may be a strange question but, is Trajan sporting a cod piece or is he just really happy to see the lady in front of him? The oddest Egyptian depiction of a Roman emperor I've ever seen to be honest.

  • @AnExcellentChef

    @AnExcellentChef

    Ай бұрын

    It's a starched kilt, a common piece of clothing for higher class men in Egyptian art. As to why would anyone want his kilt to be so starched as to be stiff? No idea. Maybe it was a sign that you didn't have to do manual labour.

  • @Joao-id4dn
    @Joao-id4dnАй бұрын

    I wonder how many egyptians were able to read hieroglyphs in ancient egypt. Maybe 1 % of the egyptian society?

  • @Fridaynightparty
    @Fridaynightparty27 күн бұрын

    This writing system may have came from Sudan

  • @jussikankinen9409
    @jussikankinen9409Ай бұрын

    What mean fish fish horse bird

  • @TheZenGarden_
    @TheZenGarden_Ай бұрын

    The original Hamitic people of Egypt have not ruled in their land since the 25th dynasty around 656 BCE.

  • @erreryhj

    @erreryhj

    Ай бұрын

    The rulers of 25th dynasty were not Egyptians they were invaders from nubia

  • @TheZenGarden_

    @TheZenGarden_

    Ай бұрын

    @@erreryhj That's true, but nevertheless they were also African Hamites.

  • @annemurphy9339

    @annemurphy9339

    Ай бұрын

    There are many genetic lines descended from Ham; some may have become black, but the Egyptians were Hamites and their origins are in the Levant.

  • @TheZenGarden_

    @TheZenGarden_

    Ай бұрын

    @@annemurphy9339 Most all hueman beings descends from one of these six fathers; Shem, Hham, Yaphet, Yishma'el, Esaw, Ya'aqov. Since its a genetic impossibility for the originally hueman beings on earth to have been "white people," everyone in ancient times were melanated hueman beings, which means Hham was always "black," as well as everyone else in ancient times, and your ethnicity is always determined by your father's bloodline. Which means if you came from Hham all his children are genetically African (Hamites), that can not be changed no matter who he mixes his blood with. And btw, the only "white people" who lived in that part of the world before Alexander the Greek, were known as lepers aka Levi.13:12,13. Gen10:6-20 are all African - Hhamites.

  • @annemurphy9339

    @annemurphy9339

    Ай бұрын

    @@TheZenGarden_ You make false statements from the start: it is absolutely possible for the original human beings to have been white. We know they weren’t black because black Africans carry the parental haplogroup of the Aborigine from which they descend, which precludes them from being first. And please list the scripture that ever says Ham was black. Ham is described as darker - in all probability the darker olive colors ruin we commonly associate with parts of the Middle East - but never as black. As to the leper nonsense, that is remarkably silly: fairer skin that can blush is the marker of the ruddy Adamite creation. Leprosy is a disease that could be fatal: it began as red patches on the skin, & then the patches of red would puff up before becoming covered in a true white, glossy scale. This stark white scale would stand out dramatically on any shade of healthy skin since no one - not even albinos, who occur in every ethnicity - are actually white. That is why Leviticus 13:13 says when someone is examined by the priest, if he has turned white [normal complexion, not the stark white scale], he is clean.

  • @siyacer
    @siyacerАй бұрын

    today

  • @strictlyeducationalmagick
    @strictlyeducationalmagickАй бұрын

    Only the copts could read them. They left with the gold.

  • @TommyHanusa
    @TommyHanusaАй бұрын

    I briefly studied some ancient Egyptian Hieroglyphs and apparently, as most people had assumed, modern Egyptians don't use hieroglyphics. I found this out by traveling to Egypt.

  • @tom_demarco

    @tom_demarco

    Ай бұрын

    They devolved

  • @jeffnelson4489
    @jeffnelson4489Ай бұрын

    They never could read Aliens did

  • @MarkVrem
    @MarkVremАй бұрын

    take a shot everytime he says magical.

  • @Natef89

    @Natef89

    Ай бұрын

    He said it like what, twice? Not a very fun game.

  • @denisehorner8448

    @denisehorner8448

    Ай бұрын

    I'm drunk, as I also took one when he said magic. 😢

  • @chrisken8902
    @chrisken8902Ай бұрын

    About 20 - 30 years after inventing beer ??

  • @deanjacobs1766
    @deanjacobs1766Ай бұрын

    About the time that the left in Egypt introduced New Math

  • @user-ft3np9bk3x
    @user-ft3np9bk3xАй бұрын

    The flood

  • @gustavderkits8433
    @gustavderkits8433Ай бұрын

    Details . You draw a conclusion that hieroglyphics were used for over three thousand years but the data you support that with cover 2800 years.

  • @gustavderkits8433

    @gustavderkits8433

    Ай бұрын

    Edit: at the very end their is a mention of 390-something AD

  • @VeteranExpat
    @VeteranExpatАй бұрын

    𓅓𓄿𓇋𓄡𓅫

  • @ChrisThornburn-ke5xk
    @ChrisThornburn-ke5xkАй бұрын

    only about 5% of the population could read hieroglyphs none in inner africa could read them at anytime cleopatra was the only ptolomy that could read them

  • @Andrelour
    @AndrelourАй бұрын

    I can't help it but his voice and speech makes me imagine a big beaver narrating this😂

  • @truthseeker2190
    @truthseeker2190Ай бұрын

    When they stopped being Atlantians

  • @118pickle
    @118pickleАй бұрын

    And why are artefacts like this constantly destroyed religion evil religion 😢

  • @gregbors8364
    @gregbors8364Ай бұрын

    The must have started modeling their public education system on the Americans’

  • @clivepilusa7734
    @clivepilusa7734Ай бұрын

    Egyptians never lost the ability to read hieroglyphics. The people who conquered them and usurped the identity are the ones who lost it.

  • @OrlyVlogt
    @OrlyVlogtАй бұрын

    Go to: playback settings: speed: 1.25 Thank me in 7 minutes and 32 seconds.

  • @j.a.weishaupt1748

    @j.a.weishaupt1748

    Ай бұрын

    Why is everyone in such a hurry nowadays 😭

  • @ivanos_95
    @ivanos_95Ай бұрын

    First when the Egyptians adopted the Greek alphabet, and established the Coptic language, which become the most advanced form of the Egyptian language, but ultimately when Egypt was colonized by the Arab-Muslims, who tried to enforce the Arabic language, what forced the native Egyptians, who tried to preserve their local culture, to focus everything around the Coptic language, which then replaced all the more primitive forms of the Egyptian language, as the only advanced alternative to the Arabic language.

  • @jerichothirteen1134

    @jerichothirteen1134

    Ай бұрын

    That makes sense

  • @kiuk_kiks

    @kiuk_kiks

    3 сағат бұрын

    The Greco-Romans colonised the lower Nile valley and displaced as well as intermarried the local black natives. They’re not natives, and that’s why they spoke Greek. They were literally Greeks themselves.

  • @butterzmack
    @butterzmackАй бұрын

    Or maybe modern Egyptians are not the original kemet civilization

  • @fatosshubert7272

    @fatosshubert7272

    Ай бұрын

    MASAR civilisation.

  • @PhedelCastro

    @PhedelCastro

    Ай бұрын

    Some are some aren’t but modern Egyptians are the closest descendants to the ancient Egyptians than any other people

  • @sheilah4525
    @sheilah4525Ай бұрын

    For the same, sad reasons that most Z gens are illiterate. Human declination.

  • @JosePerez-ld8qg
    @JosePerez-ld8qgАй бұрын

    Okay, hold on. .. Aren't hieroglyphics basically Emojis?

  • @bishopofsahs
    @bishopofsahsАй бұрын

    Because they did not invent it. They came upon it!

  • @customsongmaker
    @customsongmakerАй бұрын

    So the ability to read hieroglyphs disappeared when the white people disappeared from Egypt, and the ability to read hieroglyphs returned when white people returned. Kind of like how Rameses had red hair and built pyramids, Attila the Hun had red hair but the Chinese pyramids stopped being built when red-haired people disappeared from China, and the ability to build pyramids also disappeared in South America along with the disappearance of the blonde mummies found there. In a related pattern, the Stone Age ended with the arrival of Europeans in North America, South America, Sub-Saharan Africa, Australia, and the Pacific Islands. Since the Stone Age had ended about 4,000 years earlier in the developed world, and 4,000 years wasn't long enough for the other places to catch up, it's probable that they never would have caught up.

  • @blueswadeshoes4012
    @blueswadeshoes4012Ай бұрын

    The anglos are always the reason for the lost languages and writing. I’m sure they were forbidden to use hyroglypics and threatened with deletion. SMH

  • @lindahogle5622
    @lindahogle5622Ай бұрын

    The pyramid was before the flood and also Egypt was conquered by different cultures.

  • @SkyFly19853
    @SkyFly19853Ай бұрын

    You mean when they were conquered and converted to another religion FORCEFULLY ?... 😏

  • @FrankoB469

    @FrankoB469

    Ай бұрын

    to which religion?

  • @SkyFly19853

    @SkyFly19853

    Ай бұрын

    @@FrankoB469 from an ancient Polytheistic to Monotheistic one...

  • @FrankoB469

    @FrankoB469

    Ай бұрын

    @@SkyFly19853 which one is monotheistic? And who conqured them?

  • @SkyFly19853

    @SkyFly19853

    Ай бұрын

    @@FrankoB469 that one... you gotta do some research...

  • @adrianwebster6923

    @adrianwebster6923

    Ай бұрын

    @@SkyFly19853you sure you dont need to do the research instead?

  • @polemeros
    @polemerosАй бұрын

    I don't know your age or anything like that, but your narration contains a growing change in American English among younger people, one that I must say I do not like. In words like "written", with a tt just before a final en, you give it a glottal stop, so that the tt disappears and comes out at ri'-un. The standard has been rit' en.....To my ear, this sounds like Black dialect or like regional UK dialect. Not appealing.

  • @user-qq8jv6xb2c
    @user-qq8jv6xb2cАй бұрын

    They never could read hieroglyphs. The y did not build anything in Egypt. They just found everything. The building had been done hundreds of thousands of years before there were any Egyptians. So how could they stop being able to read something that came millennia before they even existed?

  • @j.a.weishaupt1748

    @j.a.weishaupt1748

    Ай бұрын

    I want that stuff you’re sniffing

  • @Shimra8888
    @Shimra8888Ай бұрын

    What a pity. A truly unique and original writing system like Sumerian cuneiform, Chinese characters, Mayan glyphs, Harrapan symbols. Run of the mill alphabets is something everyone used and is merely derivative, lacks uniqueness, utilitarian and soulless.

  • @raptor4916

    @raptor4916

    Ай бұрын

    Every writing system is unique...

  • @Shimra8888

    @Shimra8888

    Ай бұрын

    @@raptor4916 not alphabets … they all originated with Phoenician writing simplified from Egyptian hieroglyphics. So all alphabets are derivative of a derivative. Unoriginal. Lesser than.

  • @stevens1041

    @stevens1041

    Ай бұрын

    I took three years of Japanese in highschool, and three years of Mandarin Chinese at University (Chinese was my minor). Interesting, but these writing systems have significant drawbacks. Japanese especially, has significant problems--it is a fun novelty until you're forced to use it for your professional, everyday life--then you will be less enthusiastic about it. There is an excellent reason why Korea and Viet Nam both abandoned such writing systems.

  • @Shimra8888

    @Shimra8888

    Ай бұрын

    @@stevens1041 Korea less so, but Vietnam adopting the Latin alphabet is a heresy. Vietnamnese have lost a bit of themselves, diminished their civilization by adopting an alien writing system. They are lesser than now.

  • @WTFisDrifting

    @WTFisDrifting

    Ай бұрын

    @@stevens1041 This right here. Novelty or unique doesn’t equate good/better. The everyday use and ease of use is most important. I work with cars and engineers are well known for their unique or novelty creations. These often fail in everyday use and are just annoying. Same can be applied here.

  • @HandyMan657
    @HandyMan65727 күн бұрын

    Magical thinking = christianity Fact

  • @b1crusade384
    @b1crusade384Ай бұрын

    They stopped when the original Black inhabitants fled and the people who live there now came in. Just think. Italians language is similar to Latin that Romans spoke and they can understand it if they try. Arabic is the polar opposite of Ancient Egyptian (Kemet) language and the current inhabitants cannot understand it. Guess why.

  • @Adsper2000

    @Adsper2000

    Ай бұрын

    Okay, then why can’t the descendants of the original Egyptians who fled elsewhere read Kemet either?

  • @b1crusade384

    @b1crusade384

    Ай бұрын

    @@Adsper2000 Great question. When people flee, they slowly assimilate into the local culture. Like many 4th generation XYZ-Americans like Italian-Americans and German-Americans do not speak Italian and German (Deutsch). Some cannot even point out Italy or Germany on a map. Imagine if you extend that to 20 generations. People who are forced to flee end up losing their culture and language down the line. People who flee also share their culture with locals. Like tacos and burritos is popular in America. Black Ancient Egyptian styles can be found in other cultures like Yorubas in Nigeria. However, people who stay in their land keep aspects of their cultures through generations. The facts that modern Egyptian do not understand anything about Ancient Egypt tells me all I need to know.

  • @Adsper2000

    @Adsper2000

    Ай бұрын

    @@b1crusade384Yeah, those French people really identify with the Celtic druids. Same for the Iranians and the Achaemenid/Sassanid dynasties. Did you know that the Mauryan Empire, the first dynasty in history to ever unite India, was entirely forgotten about by Indians until the 19th century when it was rediscovered? Culture is not determined by ancestry. Turkish people only have like 25% Turkic DNA, but that doesn’t mean they identify with the Hittites or the Byzantines. Reverse your logic. If the original Egyptians fled and lost their culture through generations of assimilating under the rule of other cultures, then it could also be that they never fled, and simply lost their culture through generations of assimilating under the rule of other cultures. Y’know, like almost every single other people the Romans, Greeks, Arabs occupied but didn’t replace. And look at a map. No Egyptian is running across the continent through the Sahara, Sahel, and rainforests to reach Nigeria. Camels weren’t even introduced into Africa at that point in time. They would just settle in Ethiopia, like the Ethiopian Jews did.

  • @b1crusade384

    @b1crusade384

    Ай бұрын

    @@Adsper2000 go take your cognitive dissonance logic nonsense to other people who also are in denial and intentionally blind to facts.

  • @Johan-ez5wo
    @Johan-ez5woАй бұрын

    Quiete simple though? There arent Egyptians there, only Arabs.

  • @jacklee8703
    @jacklee8703Ай бұрын

    Egypt is famous for its Past but what's Egypt famous for now?? Nothing.

  • @derrickthewhite1

    @derrickthewhite1

    Ай бұрын

    The Suez Canal, I would think. Couple years ago it dominated world headlines.

  • @j.a.weishaupt1748

    @j.a.weishaupt1748

    Ай бұрын

    So?