If it Cain's mark was not literal how would those who would have killed him notice it?

@Winterstonecalling

4 ай бұрын

It was an unmistakable sign for anyone that looked upon him. God is not the author of confusion. Yep, it would have been noticeable.

@dennisboyd1712

4 ай бұрын

AMEN, exactly!

@bessieoriotis5104

4 ай бұрын

​@@Winterstonecallingq

@sunnyjohnson992

4 ай бұрын

The Bible doesn’t say that a sign or a mark was placed on Cain’s person in any way. The sign consisted of a solemn decree that was known and observed by others and that was intended to prevent his being killed out of revenge!

@tatie7604

4 ай бұрын

Yes, and where did they come from?

I’ve been watching your sermon’s and teachings for about 2-3 months. I was brought up Christian, believe in Jesus Christ. You have help me in knowing from the Bible no matter my sin Jesus has saved me today. I have felt unworthy for more than 45 years but today I’m forgiven and feel it in my heart. Thank you for your dedication to God and all of us.

It took a "lettered, tenured, educated Bible scholar" 45 minutes to say "i dont know what the mark of Cain is". Bless his heart.

@rick31869

3 ай бұрын

aint dat sum F-ing chit lol . i stop watching at the 10:42 mark and started reading comment ,well actually i am stopping at yours lol !!! what a disappointment this must be for people who have watch ! .

@commanderman_64

3 ай бұрын

@@rick31869 you are correct. I was very disappointed because I was looking to put a few more pieces of the Biblical puzzle together. Oh well... I don't think a preacher shud use click bait titles. Ant that sort of a lie?

@thomaslay8144

3 ай бұрын

Sometimes it's more about trying to destroy stupid and unbiblical teaching about a subject that unlearned and prejudiced individuals will try and propagate as biblical truth.

@commanderman_64

3 ай бұрын

@@thomaslay8144 Good point 👍

@Dominator37

3 ай бұрын

@@commanderman_64I dont know but maybe its just me but anytime one spends some time learning about Gods word , i dunt ever think its click bait ! If it has you thinking about what the good Lord would allow you to Believe or whats is faults…! Take a look around and see how many people believe some fable or faults teachings and sometimes it takes a lifetime to expel or counter that belief..!!!

I prayed the sinner's prayer with you and I believe that I've returned home. Thank you Jesus.

@user-hv4lb1qw4x

Ай бұрын

❤❤❤

I repented from my sins today repentance is the master key which unlock all the doors , thank you Tiff Amen

@jimfinch4706

3 ай бұрын

Continue on with your commitment to our Heavenly Father and let love rule your life.

@normangross8424

3 ай бұрын

😅😅😅😊😊​@@jimfinch4706

Tiff, you earned a place in my heart a long time ago. Bless you, fisher of men .

I love to hear your teachings! It makes me feel closer to Our savior!

Tiff, your presence in my life is the compelling evidence of my search for a trusted Bible scholar. YOU ARE THAT MAN ! Praise God for your devoted life !

How did people know when they saw that the mark on Cain was to warn them?

@danielstudniski8945

Ай бұрын

What people?? There was supposed to be know one else on the planet except his family.

@JC-DC

23 күн бұрын

​@@danielstudniski8945 great question, wondering the same thing

@Matthew-cp2eg

5 күн бұрын

finally one is asking the right question. a marknisnt needed if only his family was around. this then delves into who was Cain wife? Other people, Gen1

Before yesterday I had never heard of you….so glad God guided me to your channel.

@amiller2912

Ай бұрын

That was me today..I just came across Tiff Shuttlesworth video and I am so grateful..thank You Lord

Tiff,,I prayed the sinners prayer with you,,and I am saved.God Bless you.

@mannygonzalez9825

4 ай бұрын

Amen ❤️

@kamaujo2000

4 ай бұрын

Praise God! Keep your walk with Jesus Christ 🙏.

@ayakangeth860

4 ай бұрын

Welcome to the family of Christ and God the father ❤ may the Lord bless you ❤

@S.R.M.

4 ай бұрын

@@kamaujo2000 Jesus, a name that has only existed since the 17th century, and therefore never revealed by God. This name “Jesus” is a Latin transformation of the name original Latin name of “Iesus”, as can be seen in the 1611 English KJV where we find the name "Iesus". There is a difference in spelling and pronunciation (Jesus=gee-sus) and (Iesus=ee-sus). Iesus comes from the Greek Iesous. Iesous is a transliteration of Yeshua, an Aramaic name. Here is the Problem, the apostle Peter stated: "Nor is there salvation in any other, for there is no other name under heaven given among men by which we must be saved” (Acts 4:12). The question is, what is the by which we must be saved? So which name is the one name revealed from heaven? Is it Jesus, Iesus, or Iesous? The answer is None of these names. These names were never revealed by God. Yeshua is clearly the name used to transliterate from Aramaic to Greek causing "Iesous," which would indicate that translators thought Yeshua to be the Savior's original name. Another problem is that these names, Jesus, Iesus, and Iesous have no intrinsic meaning regarding salvation in any language. This tells us that using the name "Jesus" is in error. The Savior revealed His name to Saul, who was later known as the apostle Paul, in HEBREW! The name “Jesus” is not a Hebrew name, and the Savior never knew this name. The apostle Paul testified, "And when we all had fallen to the ground, I heard a voice speaking to me and saying in the Hebrew language, ‘Saul, Saul, why are you persecuting Me? It is hard for you to kick against the goads.’ So I said, ‘Who are You, Lord?’ And He said, ‘I am Yeshua(?), whom you are persecuting" (Acts 26:14-15). There is no letter J in Hebrew. The Hebrew letter Yod, the first letter in the name of Christ, corresponds to the English letter Y. So why are we using the letters J or I in place of Y? Yeshua is a shortened name for Yehoshua. Yeh, in Yehoshua, used to be YAH, as in YAHOSHUA, but was changed to Yehoshua for many centuries only to be shortened to Yeshua. God did not put the name of Jesus into our Bible, it was done by auspices of the church leadership, the blind leading the blind, which allowed for the illegitimate changes in the only revealed name of salvation to become an entirely different name never revealed by God. We are supposed to say, "Halleluyah," which means "Praise YAH!" YAH is the name that is above every name, which the apostle Paul heard on the road to Damascus. He, Paul, heard “the name which is above every name,” that is YAH, and he wrote as much: "Therefore God also has highly exalted Him and given Him the name which is above every name, that at the name of YAHSHUA every knee should bow, of those in heaven, and of those on earth, and of those under the earth, and that every tongue should confess that YAHSHUA the Christ is LORD, to the glory of God the Father" (Philippians 2:9-11). Every tongue, every language, is to know this one revealed name by which we must be saved! YAH is “the name which is above every name!” Just as the apostle Paul heard it. Because the Savior of the world has the name {YAH}, we stand by the true name of YAHSHUA! It is serious because we are warned that to reject or not believe in the name of YAHSHUA, one stands condemned. "For God so loved the world that He gave His only begotten Son, that whoever believes in Him should not perish but have everlasting life. For God did not send His Son into the world to condemn the world, but that the world through Him might be saved. “He who believes in Him is not condemned; but he who does not believe is condemned already, because he has not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God" (John 3:16-18). If you do not see how serious this is, you are lost in the Traditions of men that make void the word of God (Mark 7). Do we deny the prophet, who testified to the name YAH, for he said, “Behold, God is my salvation, I will trust and not be afraid; ‘For Yah, the Lord, is my strength and song; He also has become my salvation’” (Isaiah 12:2 NKJV). Do we deny the Savior, who told the people, that before Abraham was, He was YAH? YAHSHUA said to them, “Most assuredly, I say to you, before Abraham was, I AM.” YAH means “I AM” in Hebrew. The people knew what He said, that He told them that He was their God, who spoke to Moses. Moses was told that God’s name is YAH. Then Moses said to God, “Indeed, when I come to the children of Israel and say to them, ‘The God of your fathers has sent me to you,’ and they say to me, ‘What is His name?’ what shall I say to them?” And God said to Moses, “HaYAH Ashar HaYAH.” (which means: “I AM WHO I AM.”) And He said, “Thus you shall say to the children of Israel, ‘I AM has sent me to you.’” Moreover, God said to Moses, “Thus you shall say to the children of Israel: ‘The Lord God of your fathers, the God of Abraham, the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob, has sent me to you. This is My name forever, and this is My memorial to all generations” (Exodus 3:13-15). LORD=YHWH=YaHaWaH and YAH is “the I AM,” and Hawah is “to be”, as in everpresent. YHWH means, “I AM ever present.” It has come to this that to know the one name by which we must be saved, we have to rely on the Word of God, because religious leaders will claim that the name YAHSHUA is a “philological impossibility!” And many are deceived by that statement.

@hlalomkovane4411

3 ай бұрын

Hallelujah. God bless you 🙏

Tiff, you're a breath of fresh air in this dark world. Thank you for staying true to the Word. Much love.

Some years ago I went through something while I was a leader in the church. It was a marital issue. And even though I could feel and see God close to me, I tried to fix things instead of waiting on The Lord. I eventually abandoned my positions in the church and even though I didn't go back to a worldly lifestyle I believe that I strayed from the path. Today I feel The Lord calling and taking me back to a life as a church leader. These studies have both encouraged and enriched me greatly. Please help me pray. I also have a brother, Carlos, in a Physical Rehab hospital in Fla. He's a dialysis patient. Help us pray for him. God bless you!

@aimee-lynndonovan6077

3 ай бұрын

Will do brother.

I love the way you take time to teach the Bible that even someone who is a new convent can follow.I really love it,than rush through thinking everyone is at the same page with Bible. Thank you so much.

@biker38297

3 ай бұрын

Right. I dont understand why they dont see that. It couldnt have been a sign or token. Cain wasnt going to carry around a sign. Why cant people just take the word for what it says. Its like they try to say the mark of the beast is a chip. Well thats not what the bible says. It says its a mark. You can cut a chip out of the skin. But im not sure what the mark will be. Im sure after people take the mark they wont want it removed because they will have to have it in order to buy or sale. Let me ask you a question. I like your comment and you are right it has to be literal. But the question id like to ask is Who would it be that would kill cain if God had not put a mark on him? lol Just wondering if you know. I have studyed this for a number of years. I like asking questions that will blow peoples mind. Think about it. Who was on the earth besides Adam and Eve and their kids? If it was only family why would any of them kill their own family member?

@richardrogers1963

3 ай бұрын

By by by

Also, let God lead you!! Try not to listen to every foolish thing people say, including that you take too long in explaining the word!! Not everyone is in a rush!! Go as quick as God tells you!! That's how people miss things and don't get the CORRECT interpretation and understanding! Good job!! 😊

Tiff I’ve been watching you since 2020! I have a journal filled with notes from your videos and my Bible is all highlighted up! 😂❤😊

God bless you Tiff for being faithful to the scripture and laying it us straight. Stay blessed.

I love listening to your teaching. You are one of my most trusted teachers. Thank you Tiff! God bless you 🙏❤️

Thanks again Ev Tiff. You have clarified this passage of Scripture that I have no doubts. I love these teachings that make us more knowledgeable of the Word of God! 😊😊❤❤❤

Tiff I prayed that prayer and I want to be ready to meet The Lord Jesus Christ ❤️

@beblessedthroughhim1865

Ай бұрын

😮😅😊kzklXl ❤🎉😮😮😅😮😅

Pastor Tiff, i really like your style of teaching. You are so concise and clear and make the scripture easy to understand. We really need more teachers like you everywhere. Thank you so much and keep up the excellent work.

I love the teachings and learning stuff I never knew. Keep preaching you’re an awesome teacher .

From South Africa. 1st time I listen to teachings..... Wow so powerful and so well explained. Thank you🙏

Love his teaching, I’ve gone back 2 years of his teaching, glad here’s a new one❤❤ 😂😂😂😂

I came across your teaching for the first time today. I could not be separated from these two teachings on Cain. Im a new follower. You're a blessing 🙌

Tiff this is my second time attending your Bible Study I am small cell group leader here in our home town Bauan, Batangas in the Philippines SALAMAT for your clear message of the Word of God

@churchonthehillpraiseband5138

2 ай бұрын

Talaga

Thank you so much Tiff for your Bible teachings 🙌I am seeing a Massive growth in my spiritual life from the day I started following your channel. Teaching the word as it is💯

I would love to hear your teaching on tattoos Pastor

I haved prayed with you. It just felt like a strengthening spirit. Im not completely lost. But was touched by your prayer plus Galations.🙏

I truly enjoy your teaching !Blessings.

Amen man of God each time I'm listening to your powerful teachings of bible prophecies i keep growing in the Grace of the Lord and knowledge of the Lord and watchfulness of the day of the Lord scoming for the church the rapture not the second coming. Im now clear between the two praise God 🙏

@PieterPotgieter-md8qw

4 ай бұрын

We living in day's that you can't listen to every preacher teaching, but in the time I listened to you all I heard is according to the teachings of the Holy spirit. Please paster pray for us in South Africa we need biblical truth like never before. Peace

I’m still having trouble understanding what the mark was. I know you said it was a warning, but how were people warned if there were not an obvious sign?

@lindacouncil1353

4 ай бұрын

I think he turned him black...

@alogeetaylor3365

3 ай бұрын

All people were black back then silly!​@lindacouncil1353

@lindacouncil1353

3 ай бұрын

@@alogeetaylor3365 actually Adam was red

@alogeetaylor3365

3 ай бұрын

​So your saying adam and eve were Caucasian??​@@lindacouncil1353

Absolutely enjoy your teachings Pastor Tiff. God bless you.

Dear brother Tiff may God bless you abundantly. Thank you for your wise teachings that are thoroughly investigated and based completely in the bible that is the Holy word of God.May God keep you and give you even more wisdom so that you keep bringing people to salvation through your teachings. Blessings and love in Jesus Christ. LS

Tiff ,Thank you for this interesting teaching of the word ,God bless you and your family ,amen ❤

Pastor Tiff, i see you griping your bible tight in your hands, You sure belong to Jesus!! I sense you just want to do right by God! May he bless and keep you and your family members in these last days😊

God bless you always my brother. And keep on doing what God bless you to do 🙏🏻

I have prayed with you and feel revived. Thanks for all that you do.

I Really Appreciate Your Spirit Of humility and sincerity. May God continue to Bless your efforts

I redediricat my life to God today. I liked the unbiased teaching. Thank you.

Thank you Tiff for teaching the bible. I am so grateful for you. I trust you always ❤️ God bless you always ❤️🙏

Praise the Lord 🙌🏻 thank you for another powerful teaching🙌🏻

I love your teaching brother. I have learned a lot since I started listening to you teach God's word. Thank God and thank you.

You are trust worthy.we are thankful for preachers who preach and believe in God's word thank you we are always watching

Praise the Lord pastor .This is from India Bangalore, sr , Hilda . Thank you for explaining us above Bible old testament subject .i am watching again 2nd time now , nd thus gaing in depth biblical knowledge .thank you for the sinners prayers . Here in India also i attend ministry teaching very often . I thank you once again , may God bless you your family circle, loved once with long life good health nd more renewed anioting .....SHALLOM .Thank you Jesus .

Thank brother, I want to echo what brother said, if Caines mark was not visible, why would, he worry about people Trying to kill him?

Enjoyed your video and prayed with you

appreciate your teachings. have learned so much. God Bless.

Thank Evangelist, you have been a blessing to me in many ways. I pray God gives you your heart's desire🙌🏾

Thank you Pastor Tiff .God bless your ministry

Thank you we prayed with you. Blessed our day.

Thank You Pastor Tiff for Gods Word 🙏

Thanks alot Tiff, I prayed the sinners prayer with you

Until today I never heard of your teachings thank you so much.

One of the most important object lesson presentations yet - not because of any revelations as to what Cain’s mark consisted of, but because the question provides an opportunity to emphasise that we must NEVER indulge in dogma that cannot be supported by scripture. OK to have theories on questions on Biblical matters which may be difficult to interpret, as that’s part of the thinking and learning process, but must remain as theories unless they can be backed up by God’s Word in an ironclad manner. Once again, many thanks for sharing, Tiff.

Hello Evangelist Tiff Shuttlesworth, I love your videos. They are so helpful and informational. I was listening to the Adalis and Magalis podcast from 2/2/2024 about "Do Aliens Exist", and they brought up the idea of a "Lucifarian Flood". Do you think you could do some videos on that? "What happened between Genesis 1:1 and Genesis 1:2? There is so much information online, but I believe it could be helpful to get an objective view (from you) on the subject. Thank you for your time! Thanks, Corvette4speed

Thank you for teaching this

Thank You for continuing my journey.

I love the way you teach the Bible. These people do not under that some of us need to have the Bible broken down . So thank you for the way you teach the Bible. So don’t change your style Pastor .

AMEN 🙏 thank you for sharing God's Word and praying for me 💕🙏 l am blessed.

Thanks for clarifying this subject for me, God bless!!!

Thank you, Sir! We appreciate your teachings and look forward to viewing more of your videos. The world needs more of your type preaching the true word of God. May God Blees You! You were made by God for this time.

Thank you so much for sharing. Everyday is a learning process. It is interesting to listen to you.

People of God be humble and gentle while giving our comments. We should be grateful and thankful we get to hear him teach direct from God's Word. Its so much true knowledge of God's Word. Gentle comments are better than rude direct hurting coments. Suggestions put in gentle words can be appreciated so do refrain from being unkind.

@joycetennison3941

4 ай бұрын

Love. Your. Teaching. God. Bless you

@S.R.M.

4 ай бұрын

@@joycetennison3941 Jesus, a name that has only existed since the 17th century, and therefore never revealed by God. This name “Jesus” is a Latin transformation of the name original Latin name of “Iesus”, as can be seen in the 1611 English KJV where we find the name "Iesus". There is a difference in spelling and pronunciation (Jesus=gee-sus) and (Iesus=ee-sus). Iesus comes from the Greek Iesous. Iesous is a transliteration of Yeshua, an Aramaic name. Here is the Problem, the apostle Peter stated: "Nor is there salvation in any other, for there is no other name under heaven given among men by which we must be saved” (Acts 4:12). The question is, what is the by which we must be saved? So which name is the one name revealed from heaven? Is it Jesus, Iesus, or Iesous? The answer is None of these names. These names were never revealed by God. Yeshua is clearly the name used to transliterate from Aramaic to Greek causing "Iesous," which would indicate that translators thought Yeshua to be the Savior's original name. Another problem is that these names, Jesus, Iesus, and Iesous have no intrinsic meaning regarding salvation in any language. This tells us that using the name "Jesus" is in error. The Savior revealed His name to Saul, who was later known as the apostle Paul, in HEBREW! The name “Jesus” is not a Hebrew name, and the Savior never knew this name. The apostle Paul testified, "And when we all had fallen to the ground, I heard a voice speaking to me and saying in the Hebrew language, ‘Saul, Saul, why are you persecuting Me? It is hard for you to kick against the goads.’ So I said, ‘Who are You, Lord?’ And He said, ‘I am Yeshua(?), whom you are persecuting" (Acts 26:14-15). There is no letter J in Hebrew. The Hebrew letter Yod, the first letter in the name of Christ, corresponds to the English letter Y. So why are we using the letters J or I in place of Y? Yeshua is a shortened name for Yehoshua. Yeh, in Yehoshua, used to be YAH, as in YAHOSHUA, but was changed to Yehoshua for many centuries only to be shortened to Yeshua. God did not put the name of Jesus into our Bible, it was done by auspices of the church leadership, the blind leading the blind, which allowed for the illegitimate changes in the only revealed name of salvation to become an entirely different name never revealed by God. We are supposed to say, "Halleluyah," which means "Praise YAH!" YAH is the name that is above every name, which the apostle Paul heard on the road to Damascus. He, Paul, heard “the name which is above every name,” that is YAH, and he wrote as much: "Therefore God also has highly exalted Him and given Him the name which is above every name, that at the name of YAHSHUA every knee should bow, of those in heaven, and of those on earth, and of those under the earth, and that every tongue should confess that YAHSHUA the Christ is LORD, to the glory of God the Father" (Philippians 2:9-11). Every tongue, every language, is to know this one revealed name by which we must be saved! YAH is “the name which is above every name!” Just as the apostle Paul heard it. Because the Savior of the world has the name {YAH}, we stand by the true name of YAHSHUA! It is serious because we are warned that to reject or not believe in the name of YAHSHUA, one stands condemned. "For God so loved the world that He gave His only begotten Son, that whoever believes in Him should not perish but have everlasting life. For God did not send His Son into the world to condemn the world, but that the world through Him might be saved. “He who believes in Him is not condemned; but he who does not believe is condemned already, because he has not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God" (John 3:16-18). If you do not see how serious this is, you are lost in the Traditions of men that make void the word of God (Mark 7). Do we deny the prophet, who testified to the name YAH, for he said, “Behold, God is my salvation, I will trust and not be afraid; ‘For Yah, the Lord, is my strength and song; He also has become my salvation’” (Isaiah 12:2 NKJV). Do we deny the Savior, who told the people, that before Abraham was, He was YAH? YAHSHUA said to them, “Most assuredly, I say to you, before Abraham was, I AM.” YAH means “I AM” in Hebrew. The people knew what He said, that He told them that He was their God, who spoke to Moses. Moses was told that God’s name is YAH. Then Moses said to God, “Indeed, when I come to the children of Israel and say to them, ‘The God of your fathers has sent me to you,’ and they say to me, ‘What is His name?’ what shall I say to them?” And God said to Moses, “HaYAH Ashar HaYAH.” (which means: “I AM WHO I AM.”) And He said, “Thus you shall say to the children of Israel, ‘I AM has sent me to you.’” Moreover, God said to Moses, “Thus you shall say to the children of Israel: ‘The Lord God of your fathers, the God of Abraham, the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob, has sent me to you. This is My name forever, and this is My memorial to all generations” (Exodus 3:13-15). LORD=YHWH=YaHaWaH and YAH is “the I AM,” and Hawah is “to be”, as in everpresent. YHWH means, “I AM ever present.” It has come to this that to know the one name by which we must be saved, we have to rely on the Word of God, because religious leaders will claim that the name YAHSHUA is a “philological impossibility!” And many are deceived by that statement.

I was like Cain, a wanderer, but praise God I can enjoy such bible study and find my way back into the fold. Praise God. Thank you Pastor Tiff.

How would people know not to kill him? Or that he was cursed?

Never assume what you don't know!

I love listening to you brother Tiff. God blessed u

❤Amen❤Glory to God Almighty 🙏 It's so heartbreaking that most people now a days still have the character of Cain who have envy and hatred in their heart 😢🙏🙏 Thank you so much for this wonderful teaching ❤

Powerful teachings I thank God to come across this great teacher of the Bible revelations of our time 👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾

I thank God for connecting me to you May God bless you

Thank you for spreading the word of God ,Your reward will be in heaven 🙏

I thank God to meet this bible teacher who has made my day, this is well and true teaching and I feel myself closer to God thanks God bless you

Thank you man of God I have loved your word and I have listened carefully. I love the word that really comes from the foundation of the Bible and promise to continue watching and following you. God bless you

I praise GOD that he has given you Tiff wisdom to teach us to better know the bible I praise GOD AMEN

Thank the Lord for your faithfulness to the a Word . Bless you very much

I pray with you every morning. God bless.!

If cain said ?? They will kill me if they see me ! Obviously then the mark would have been something easily noticed when gazed upon ??

I've thought of this alot wishing I knew what Cain's mark was. But I've always thought Adam and Eve were brown and Dark hair like the Jews. I respect you to preach the truth in a way I can understand. That you have studied God's word and teach it truthfully.

Thank you for your teaching and enlighten us on this topic. I have heard commentators say that the curse of Cain was to make him black 😢, which as you had explained was definitely not so. Thanks again.

Hello from Liberty Lake WA🇺🇸

I'm blessed with your teachings on the mark on Cain and what was the purpose of the mark . I need to connect more Thank you Bishop Captain MULEHI.

Thanks you Tiff for your unbiased sermon and bible study. May God enrich your boundaries to reach out to the vast majority

Thank you Pastor Tiff...you are a blessed gift from God..thank You Heavenly Father for this valuable gift that is our brother, Pastor Tiff Shuttlesworth

The one thing I've ever inferred from this passage is that God thought that, even after Cain killed his brother that he was still worthy of protection. Cain was likely most hurt by Gods rejection of his sacrifice because he really did love God, but fell into the trap of "there is a way that seems right unto a man, but in the end, that way leads unto death". Another thing is that Adam and Eve made clothes of leaves (vegetation), but that wasn't sufficient. So God killed animals to make them clothes of flesh. Then Cain tried to sacrifice vegetation, but that wasn't sufficient either because God says that " blood" is needed for atonement.

All people are sinners need to repent be baptised I love everyone. ❤

Pastor, God did not accept the sacrifices of Cain, but He accepted the sacrifices of Abel. So may I ask you to explain the sacrifices that you offer unto God?

VERY ENCOURAGING MESSAGE.

I prayed with you, thank you for your prayer.

great preach, thanks Tiff

Thanks so much sir for the wisdom of the bible study and I said Amen to the prayer

Tiff I prayer that prayer today Thank You so much

Thank you Proff.Tiff.for powerful insight scriptural &prophetic teachings,I will always and pray for you to be wholely increased for His Kingdom come and for His will on earth to us people.Amen

Pastor, I have to ask how much you have verified the NLT with your knowledge of the Word? I am not asking from a place of deception I honestly want to know. I use many different Bible translations but have steered clear of the NLT because the limited amount of scholars involved with the translation. I trust your opinion/knowledge and if you've compared it against the original languages that's good enough for me to buy one and start my own study of it. I'm currently studying the NAS/NASB 77-95, LSB, ESV, NIV, KJV/NKJV and CSB. So as you can see my plates already pretty full but I am always looking for knowledge to mature in my walk with Him. Thank you if you answer and if not I fully understand. May the LORD continue to bless this ministry and bless all to know and love Him...

@roseludvik1743

4 ай бұрын

There are scripts missing out of all of thoses bibles except the king James, the only difference in the KJ and the NKJ Is all of the works to make it easier to understand, ,like I never knew what ,on the morrow ,was tomorrow,so it just changes the king James English ,I love the nkj ,I am 84 and have been reading it since 1942 , just check out what is left out of the others

@roseludvik1743

4 ай бұрын

True and we all have a little black in us

@PastorwithoutaPulpit

4 ай бұрын

@@roseludvik1743 I have done extensive study on Scripture as you can see below. You are parroting conspiracies with your beliefs about the KJV/NKJV. As you read below the level of critical study of the original languages shows all errors/differences in the manuscript evidence we have an abundance of today. I hope it helps you in your studies. With all of the evidence we now have there's simply no way I can logically doubt His Word and by extension the LORD Himself. These other books and writings from antiquity are held up as truth and in some cases factual history. These other books/poems and there evidence/sources: Second most common manuscript document Homer's Iliad meaning there are more copies of it than any other secular writing/document from antiquity of which only 643 exist dating from 13th century AD. Homer is believed to have wrote it in the 8th century BC. The Gallic Wars of Cesar in 1st century BC, there are only 10 manuscripts of that in existence dating over 1000 years after they were supposed to have been written. Herodotus wrote of history and is known as one of the first historians 5th century BC and only 8 manuscripts exist and they are from more than 1300 years after he wrote anything. History of the Peloponnesian War written by Thucydides. There are only 8 manuscripts that are from 1300 years after he supposedly wrote his account. Side notes on other religions: Book of Mormon and their various writings prior to the 1820-30's = 0 as in nothing has been found to support any of it except where it is clearly plagiarized from Scripture. Now let's look at Biblical proofs: We have a reliable collection of historical documents written by eyewitnesses during the lifetime of other eyewitnesses. They report super natural events that took place in fulfilment of specific prophecies and claim that their writings are via divine inspiration, not from men alone. Jesus Christ healed the sick, blind, deaf, dumb and paralyzed, cast out demons, walked on water, fed thousands with little, and was resurrected all of which have eyewitness accounts. The feedings alone were witnessed by the thousands He fed on the two separate occasions that we are told of in the Gospels. John tells us that there were many more signs/miracles than what are recorded in the Gospels/Bible and that it would have filled the entire earth were they all to have been written down. There can be no doubt as to the accuracy of our current Bibles as it is proven via all the source fragments, scrolls, papyri, codex' and sources dating all the way back to before Christ around 700 BC for the OT and between 100 to 150 AD for the NT. We have more proof for God's Word than any other written word in history, it is by order of magnitudes more. The early Church Fathers prior to 325 AD: Those known as the Anti-Nicene Fathers writings contain over 32,000 quotes from the New Testament from which we could reconstruct the entire/complete NT from those alone. They also contain over 19,000+ quotes from the Gospels alone prior to 325 AD. The Bible is not just a book it is a collection of 66 Books all of which are linked together by One Divine Author. In this collection of Books there are over 40 authors but only one Devine Author who links them all together via the Holy Spirit. Those authors wrote down His inspired Word. The bulk of the New Testament was written over a period of around 50 years. It was in 49 AD to 53 AD when the Scripture writings of the New Testament are thought to have begun. With the last living Apostle John dying in 100 AD. Over a period of around 1500 years it was preserved and passed on: In 3 Languages On 3 Continents There are 66,360+ source documents that have been found for the entire Bible of which there are 24,360 and counting source documents for the New Testament alone. 5,839 in the original Greek, some 2 million pages 18,524 translations of that Greek into other languages Some of the oldest sources date to 125AD which is within decades of the completion of all the books that were canonized as the New Testament. Those asking for "Scientific Proof" of the Bible are either ignorant or asking with evil intent. Scientific Method is basically: 1) Has to be observable. 2) Has to be measurable. 3) Has to be repeatable. Therefore no history can ever be proven via scientific method. You must use the historical method based on: Eyewitnesses accounts. Documents from that time or as close as possible. Make sure the story is corroborated by as many sources as possible. Look for anyone/anything that attempted to prove any of it false in that time period or as close to it as possible. Did anyone successfully prove any of it untrue, if they did why has no record of it been found? Mathew = Was written more to the Jewish audience and that's one of the reasons for the extensive genealogy of Christ. There are also more references to the Old Testament in his Gospel compared to the others. Mark = The shortest of the Gospels and is very direct or "Just the Facts" if you like. Luke = Historian A man of science, a physician, an educated and logical man who researched and gathered the accounts of eyewitnesses. He recorded the actual eyewitness accounts of our Lord and Savior, those who had heard Him speak and were present/saw the signs/miracles He performed, such as the Apostle Peter. He did this because the life of those eyewitnesses were coming to an end due to age, or Martyrdom, and he was inspired to write them down via the Holy Spirit before they could be lost or perverted by time. John = Evangelist John is organized around 7 specific events/signs/miracles all seen by eyewitnesses and corroborated by many. So he also provides proof of accuracy/truth. All of the Apostles were eyewitnesses of Jesus and/or of the resurrected Christ. Including Paul whom Jesus came to as he was on the road traveling to Damascus to persecute more Christians. This would have been the resurrected Christ or a form of Him from Heaven. There were at least 300 eyewitnesses still alive when Corinthians was written who could have disputed it but no one did. Mathias became the 12th Apostle after Judas hung himself so the argument of there not being 12 Apostles comes from ignorance or evil intent. Other cultures and non believer's historical documents show or corroborate many things that are in the Bible. Yet none of them prove any of it to be false yet they do strengthen it. All these sources allow us to be critical when it comes to the level of accuracy in our Bibles. The oldest manuscripts end The Gospel of Mark at chapter 16 verse 8. There is a lot of evidence that anything after Mark 16:8 was added later gathering parts from all the other Gospels and even Acts. 4th Century Church fathers Eusebius and Gerome both wrote that Mark ended at 16:8. Many, early Church Fathers, (after 325AD and beyond), knew these alternate endings existed and didn't use them. This is an error in the KJV, NKJV and the Book of Mormon, (unless it's been changed), which are based on more recent manuscripts that the older manuscripts disprove. Those translations have the added ending consisting of anything after Mark 16:8, (as well as other additions/differences). Newer translations may or may not include the additions but if they do they're bracketed or mentioned in the notes. The external evidence, (oldest sources), indicates that anything after 16:8 does not belong in the Gospel of Mark because those additions do not exist in the oldest sources. The internal evidence is that it is all borrowed from the other Gospel accounts and Acts. We don't know who these additions came from but we know where they got them: (below are not time stamps but Chapter and verses) .16:9 = is taken write out of Luke 8:1-3 .16:10 = John 20:18 .16:12 = Luke 24:13-32 .16:13 = Luke 24:14 .16:14 = Luke 24:36-38 .16:15 = Mathew 28:19 .16:16 = John 20:23 .16:17-18 = drawn from a lot of sources: Mathew 10, Mark 6, Luke 10, just a lot of stuff cobbled together. Acts 23-26 and Acts 28:3-6 Paul's encounter with the Asp/venomous snake. None of it after Mark 16:8 makes any sense and adds more than a little confusion with the discussion of signs/miracles and other such things. Why does Mark end the way he does? Look at the beginning of his Gospel and all throughout it reads like a highlight real of Christ's Deity and that He is in fact the very Son of God. Mark's last words were about fear, a Godly Fear of our Lord and the pure awe and wonderment of Him. No other book in history has the proof the Bible does, it is not even close. As I've shown because of the over abundance of source materials we can even be critical of what we have and know for certain that we have His Inspired Word. Word for Word and Optimal Translations prove just how accurate what we have is. Biblical Historian/Theologian AT. Robertson said we have a vast array of Biblical Manuscripts that allow us to reconstruct the Bible with more than a 99.9% degree of accuracy. With the number of archaeological excavations, (25,000+ and counting to date), it is only a matter of time until we see more ancient biblical texts and supporting secular evidence found. The Bible is the very Word of God, it is a collection of eyewitness accounts written by other inspired eyewitnesses. There's no longer any excuse for anyone to ignore that fact or to dispute it. The evidence simply does not support their arguments/views. Take care and God Bless...

@PastorwithoutaPulpit

4 ай бұрын

@@roseludvik1743 With all of the evidence we now have there's simply no way I can logically doubt His Word and by extension the LORD Himself. These other books and writings from antiquity are held up as truth and in some cases factual history. These other books/poems and there evidence/sources: Second most common manuscript document Homer's Iliad meaning there are more copies of it than any other secular writing/document from antiquity of which only 643 exist dating from 13th century AD. Homer is believed to have wrote it in the 8th century BC. The Gallic Wars of Cesar in 1st century BC, there are only 10 manuscripts of that in existence dating over 1000 years after they were supposed to have been written. Herodotus wrote of history and is known as one of the first historians 5th century BC and only 8 manuscripts exist and they are from more than 1300 years after he wrote anything. History of the Peloponnesian War written by Thucydides. There are only 8 manuscripts that are from 1300 years after he supposedly wrote his account. Side notes on other religions: Book of Mormon and their various writings prior to the 1820-30's = 0 as in nothing has been found to support any of it except where it is clearly plagiarized from Scripture. Now let's look at Biblical proofs: We have a reliable collection of historical documents written by eyewitnesses during the lifetime of other eyewitnesses. They report super natural events that took place in fulfilment of specific prophecies and claim that their writings are via divine inspiration, not from men alone. Jesus Christ healed the sick, blind, deaf, dumb and paralyzed, cast out demons, walked on water, fed thousands with little, and was resurrected all of which have eyewitness accounts. The feedings alone were witnessed by the thousands He fed on the two separate occasions that we are told of in the Gospels. John tells us that there were many more signs/miracles than what are recorded in the Gospels/Bible and that it would have filled the entire earth were they all to have been written down. There can be no doubt as to the accuracy of our current Bibles as it is proven via all the source fragments, scrolls, papyri, codex' and sources dating all the way back to before Christ around 700 BC for the OT and between 100 to 150 AD for the NT. We have more proof for God's Word than any other written word in history, it is by order of magnitudes more. The early Church Fathers prior to 325 AD: Those known as the Anti-Nicene Fathers writings contain over 32,000 quotes from the New Testament from which we could reconstruct the entire/complete NT from those alone. They also contain over 19,000+ quotes from the Gospels alone prior to 325 AD. The Bible is not just a book it is a collection of 66 Books all of which are linked together by One Divine Author. In this collection of Books there are over 40 authors but only one Devine Author who links them all together via the Holy Spirit. Those authors wrote down His inspired Word. The bulk of the New Testament was written over a period of around 50 years. It was in 49 AD to 53 AD when the Scripture writings of the New Testament are thought to have begun. With the last living Apostle John dying in 100 AD. Over a period of around 1500 years it was preserved and passed on: In 3 Languages On 3 Continents There are 66,360+ source documents that have been found for the entire Bible of which there are 24,360 and counting source documents for the New Testament alone. 5,839 in the original Greek, some 2 million pages 18,524 translations of that Greek into other languages Some of the oldest sources date to 125AD which is within decades of the completion of all the books that were canonized as the New Testament. Those asking for "Scientific Proof" of the Bible are either ignorant or asking with evil intent. Scientific Method is basically: 1) Has to be observable. 2) Has to be measurable. 3) Has to be repeatable. Therefore no history can ever be proven via scientific method. You must use the historical method based on: Eyewitnesses accounts. Documents from that time or as close as possible. Make sure the story is corroborated by as many sources as possible. Look for anyone/anything that attempted to prove any of it false in that time period or as close to it as possible. Did anyone successfully prove any of it untrue, if they did why has no record of it been found? Mathew = Was written more to the Jewish audience and that's one of the reasons for the extensive genealogy of Christ. There are also more references to the Old Testament in his Gospel compared to the others. Mark = The shortest of the Gospels and is very direct or "Just the Facts" if you like. Luke = Historian A man of science, a physician, an educated and logical man who researched and gathered the accounts of eyewitnesses. He recorded the actual eyewitness accounts of our Lord and Savior, those who had heard Him speak and were present/saw the signs/miracles He performed, such as the Apostle Peter. He did this because the life of those eyewitnesses were coming to an end due to age, or Martyrdom, and he was inspired to write them down via the Holy Spirit before they could be lost or perverted by time. John = Evangelist John is organized around 7 specific events/signs/miracles all seen by eyewitnesses and corroborated by many. So he also provides proof of accuracy/truth. All of the Apostles were eyewitnesses of Jesus and/or of the resurrected Christ. Including Paul whom Jesus came to as he was on the road traveling to Damascus to persecute more Christians. This would have been the resurrected Christ or a form of Him from Heaven. There were at least 300 eyewitnesses still alive when Corinthians was written who could have disputed it but no one did. Mathias became the 12th Apostle after Judas hung himself so the argument of there not being 12 Apostles comes from ignorance or evil intent. Other cultures and non believer's historical documents show or corroborate many things that are in the Bible. Yet none of them prove any of it to be false yet they do strengthen it. All these sources allow us to be critical when it comes to the level of accuracy in our Bibles. The oldest manuscripts end The Gospel of Mark at chapter 16 verse 8. There is a lot of evidence that anything after Mark 16:8 was added later gathering parts from all the other Gospels and even Acts. 4th Century Church fathers Eusebius and Gerome both wrote that Mark ended at 16:8. Many, early Church Fathers, (after 325AD and beyond), knew these alternate endings existed and didn't use them. This is an error in the KJV, NKJV and the Book of Mormon, (unless it's been changed), which are based on more recent manuscripts that the older manuscripts disprove. Those translations have the added ending consisting of anything after Mark 16:8, (as well as other additions/differences). Newer translations may or may not include the additions but if they do they're bracketed or mentioned in the notes. The external evidence, (oldest sources), indicates that anything after 16:8 does not belong in the Gospel of Mark because those additions do not exist in the oldest sources. The internal evidence is that it is all borrowed from the other Gospel accounts and Acts. We don't know who these additions came from but we know where they got them: (below are not time stamps but Chapter and verses) .16:9 = is taken write out of Luke 8:1-3 .16:10 = John 20:18 .16:12 = Luke 24:13-32 .16:13 = Luke 24:14 .16:14 = Luke 24:36-38 .16:15 = Mathew 28:19 .16:16 = John 20:23 .16:17-18 = drawn from a lot of sources: Mathew 10, Mark 6, Luke 10, just a lot of stuff cobbled together. Acts 23-26 and Acts 28:3-6 Paul's encounter with the Asp/venomous snake. None of it after Mark 16:8 makes any sense and adds more than a little confusion with the discussion of signs/miracles and other such things. Why does Mark end the way he does? Look at the beginning of his Gospel and all throughout it reads like a highlight real of Christ's Deity and that He is in fact the very Son of God. Mark's last words were about fear, a Godly Fear of our Lord and the pure awe and wonderment of Him. No other book in history has the proof the Bible does, it is not even close. As I've shown because of the over abundance of source materials we can even be critical of what we have and know for certain that we have His Inspired Word. Word for Word and Optimal Translations prove just how accurate what we have is. Biblical Historian/Theologian AT. Robertson said we have a vast array of Biblical Manuscripts that allow us to reconstruct the Bible with more than a 99.9% degree of accuracy. With the number of archaeological excavations, (25,000+ and counting to date), it is only a matter of time until we see more ancient biblical texts and supporting secular evidence found. The Bible is the very Word of God, it is a collection of eyewitness accounts written by other inspired eyewitnesses. There's no longer any excuse for anyone to ignore that fact or to dispute it. The evidence simply does not support their arguments/views. Take care and God Bless...

@PastorwithoutaPulpit

4 ай бұрын

@@roseludvik1743 Brother I just noticed how cold my reply to you could appear. That was not their intent and I meant no insult. The problem with text is no inflection, so instead of friendly discussion what I said could appear as belittling or insulting. That was not my intent at all. For the last few years I have been deep in study comparing different translations that come from reputable scholars of multi-denominational teams with sizes of at least 70 or more. I then go to the original Greek/Hebrew and compare the words they've used against the oldest examples we have of God's Word as well as the writings of 1st, 2nd century believers known as the Church fathers by most. It has been a very rewarding study and has helped to open the Word to me as never before. I imagine Erasmus himself would have loved to have access to the source documents/fragments we enjoy today. I was only thinking of sharing what I've learned and hopefully encouraging a fellow believer to look at some other translations. I'm truly sorry if my words offended you as that was never my intent. With brotherly love, God Bless..

Great teaching .🙏🏾🙏🏾🙏🏾

I prayed with you!

Thank you...will watch later South Africa...🎉🌿🌺🌹🌿🌻

Well Preached The Word Of God. Praise The Lord 🙏❤️

Absolutely love your teachings . God bless you

There is no record in the scriptures that specified what the mark was.