The interviews being “lost” is ONE example is suspicious behavior. They literally said they couldn’t remember who the Perdue Professor was 😂

I agree if this goes to trial its going to be wild . Trial of the century

@ACrimingShame

5 ай бұрын

right!

All the defense has to do is convince one person on that jury he is innocent

@TRUECRIMESPTV

5 ай бұрын

Nah just that there’s reasonable doubt, which there are buckets of.

I agree with you 100% Sunny. How can someone say they "don't believe what the defense is alleging?" LE admitted deleting the information!!! No need to "believe the defense." Obviously the defense is going to exaggerate what may have been in the interviews. They do it for basically 2 reasons. 1. It may have actually been important info which unfortunately can't be disproven now. And 2. To keep increasing the impression that the investigation was not done competently. And it deals directly with two of their defense theory of 3rd party perpetrators. So it can't be reasonably argued that it is not important. Now those NAMED susoects have had 7 years to come up with their alibis and there is no threat of being charged with the crime so even if they could be re-interrogsted there will be zero stress or leverage against them in new interviews.

What in the World

Yes! She is literally Alexa! ;)

If you met your son's girlfriend and you knew she was his girlfriend I think you'd remember. And precisely the way liars walk back their lies is they first say "never" then it's "okay maybe once" then it's "yeah maybe a few times" etc.

@eppleheid

5 ай бұрын

I agree and because there is a potential line of knowledge about where the girls were going from the girlfriend to the boyfriend and then to his dad, should make him worthy of investigation unless he has an alibi.

Every detail maters. EVERY DETAiL MATTERS!!!!! This guy should not be drinking prior to being on set😅

@ACrimingShame

5 ай бұрын

Lolol 🍻

I disagree about the point of it being unimportant whether or not the father of the boyfriend met the girlfriend or not. Did he have his back to her at the time? Did his son say "Hey Dad, this is my girlfriend," and the Dad not lift his head up from his paper and reply "Yeah, whatever!" Names people forget, however, we are biologically programmed to remember faces. That's why, if we meet someone, especially if it's not in a crowd, we tend to remember them.

If the interviews have been destroyed in all ways, how do we have information on what was said?

@ACrimingShame

5 ай бұрын

fbi transcript only i guess

@USALibertarian

5 ай бұрын

​​@@ACrimingShame FBI is completely untrustworthy IMO. In fact, unless I'm mistaken, when it is just the FBI they have a policy of NOT recording interrogations. I have to question why they would do that? So they can massage the info is my answer.

The LE & Prosecution have handed reasonable doubt to the jury & defense team on a silver platter, right from the jump!!!

@ACrimingShame

5 ай бұрын

Keeps seeming like it

And the recording of RA telling officer Dan Dullin that he was at the bridge between noon and 3 is missing. Dan Dullin has a reputation for planting evidence. and now evidence is going missing.

Btw, have you seen the sketch from Theresa. SHe said she saw this person in the area of th bridge early the morning of the muders. If you compare that sketch to a pic from Logan Holder from 2017 it looks exactly like him.

@ACrimingShame

5 ай бұрын

no i have not seastar thanks

Every piece of evidence regarding Odinists seems to get lost….. super suspicious to me. Unbelievable really.

This Darryl guy is so not credible.

@ACrimingShame

5 ай бұрын

If you mean in chat, hes a good british dude

@bettychurchill5545

5 ай бұрын

@@ACrimingShame no meant the lawyer they were interviewing.

@eppleheid

5 ай бұрын

I agree

@ACrimingShame

5 ай бұрын

@@bettychurchill5545 oh lol… 🤦🏻‍♀️