My father (born in 1926) was not breathing at birth. Along with the physician, my great-grandmother was in attendance for the home birth. She took my father and quickly baptized him under the tub faucet. Mucus or whatever was blocking his airway came out. So, being born to a Catholic family helped to save his life!

@cindyrobertson3798

3 жыл бұрын

Coralie. So he lived and here you are today!

@mrjollybucket1

3 жыл бұрын

interesting.

@nick4506

3 жыл бұрын

now we got the little turkey baster/ squesebulb to suck out whatever in the newborn's mouth/lungs/sinuses.

@jimd9339

3 жыл бұрын

Baptism is immersion not sprinkling nor pouring.... Baptism did not save his life... The doc rinsed the child and the procedure saved his life... Catholicism has nothing to do with it. If he died a Catholic and believed what they believe he, sadly, is not in heaven.

@brittoncain5090

3 жыл бұрын

@@jimd9339 I suggest you look more into Catholic beliefs as you are sorely mistaken.

This must have taken a lifetime to create! Thank you so much! :D

@ReadyToHarvest

4 жыл бұрын

Thanks! It is the culmination of noticing these differences over years of studying denominational differences. It is amazing how many differences there really are.

@Naflergasin

3 жыл бұрын

Ok I’m CJ CJ bcc

@PhotoJoeAlaska

3 жыл бұрын

@@ReadyToHarvest - Great amount of detail and the presentation graphics were well done. Many Kudos!! = )

@marialauria7307

3 жыл бұрын

@@ReadyToHarvest what confuses me is Anglican in one country compared to another. For example, in Australia, they are ministers not priests

@patanthony9286

3 жыл бұрын

@@ReadyToHarvest I baptized myself no man came to me concerned about my soul so YHVH sent His Spirit of conviction and truth to me and interrupted my sinful self so I became hungry for Spiritual Bread and ate sometimes around the clock for two years after quitting my job my thought was I need this without interruption six years now I have grown to be Spiritually strong in understanding knowledge and wisdom comes from fearing the Lord My Heavenly Father whom I love and He lovers me supplies all my simple needs for this simple life my work is to do what Jesus commanded with the Holy Spirit guiding leading teaching comforting and warning of things to come nothing here for me mine the inheritance of His Kingdom Come Lord Jesus

You are so knowledgeable, it’s almost like you’ve spent a lifetime in each church! As a Baptist to Catholic convert, everything you said about those was spot on. I appreciate when people deal with what Catholicism truly is without some of the unfortunately common misconceptions.

@verntoews6937

3 жыл бұрын

Baptism is to be done to a believer who is at least old enough to make a conscious commitment to serve. Infant baptism?

@carissstewart3211

3 жыл бұрын

Ditto.

@carissstewart3211

3 жыл бұрын

@@verntoews6937 Where does the Bible say that? Or which of the Church Fathers wrote that? By way of analogy, the rite of circumcision marked one's entry into the people of God, yet there was no expectation that one must "be at least old enough to make a conscious commitment to serve." St. Paul saw in the parting of the Red Sea a type (a prefigurement) of Baptism, yet clearly the Israelites brought their little ones with them. The babies weren't simply left in Egypt until they could decide for themselves to journey to the Promised Land. As a former Baptist, I gleefully say that you are nullifying the word of God with the traditions of men. Bye

@Peaches-No-Cream

3 жыл бұрын

@@carissstewart3211 Where in the Bible does it expressly state that a baby must be Baptized? The Scriptural Evidence for what Vern had said is clearly see with Philip and the Eunuch, and after Peter's preaching on the Day of Pentecost. Both instances are shown to the reader very clearly. The Eunuch asks "What Doth hinder me to be baptized?" to which Philip says "If thou believest, thou mayest." When the men who had heard the Preaching from Peter, they asked "What shall we do?" To which Peter states "Repent, and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins." It's clearly laid out that the belief in Christ MUST come before the Baptism, which means that the person must be of an age to actually UNDERSTAND what that means. To answer your question on Circumcision, it was on the eighth day that a child was to be circumcised. And I don't understand where you get the idea that Paul had seen some sort of foretelling of Baptism in the parting of the Red Sea, I'd like the Scripture reference for that. Thanks.

@carissstewart3211

3 жыл бұрын

@@Peaches-No-Cream "Where in the Bible does it expressly state that a baby must be baptised?" One - that is an argument from silence. And if there is no passage that explicitly says "infants must be baptised," there is likewise no passage saying "the children of Christians must be baptised only after making a profession of faith." Two - the passages you cited link faith with baptism - however that does not mean that children were to be excluded. For as St. Peter said, "Repent, and be baptised every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the forgiveness of your sins; and you shall receive the gift of the Holy Spirit. For the promise is to you *and to your children* and to all that are far off, every one whom the Lord our God calls to him." (Acts 2:38-39) Those passages speak to the necessity of baptism, not it's exclusivity to adults. Certainly we read multiple times about entire households being baptised. The families of Lydia, the philippian jailer, and Stephanas were all baptised. There is no logical reason to assume infants were excluded unless one already has that preconceived idea. You missed my point about circumcision. I wasn't asking when circumcision was performed, as some non sequitur. I was pointing out that it was performed on infants! Adult men converting to Judaism would need to be baptized as adults. Abraham himself was circumcised as an old man after expressing faith in God. Jewish boys, however, are circumcised as infants in anticipation of faith. This is analogous to baptism, which St. Paul makes clear in Colossians 2:11 when he referred to baptism as "a circumcision made without hands" and "the circumcision of Christ." Finally, that passage you asked about - it's 1 Corinthians 10:1-2: " I want you to know, brethren, that our fathers were all under the cloud, and all passed through the sea, and *all were baptised into Moses in the cloud and in the sea...* One can see very clearly, when the Bible is read as a whole, with the New Testament read in light of the Old Testament, that infants are to be baptized as well as converts to the faith. After all, our Lord did say, "Let the children come to me, and do not hinder them; for to such belongs the kingdom of heaven." (Matthew 19:13-14) God bless

This is my favorite kind of Battle Royale

@danielunavideos

3 жыл бұрын

XD

@adonaiyah2196

3 жыл бұрын

Better than pubg

@adonaiyah2196

3 жыл бұрын

Or even fortnite

@adonaiyah2196

3 жыл бұрын

Like its more interesting

@Ampwich

2 ай бұрын

Dang it, forgot my parachute. (I'm sure the charismatics brought theirs)

This is a really fantastic analysis. Not only are there differences between denominations, but within the confession of a particular denomination there are aspects that are viewed as crucial to doctrine and other aspects that are handled a particular way, but they’re not viewed as being on the same level. You presented both magnificently.

This video holds your attention and is presented in clear format that is both interesting and informative.

Looking forward for the rest of the series

Thank you for taking the time to put this together!

I remember a class on Baptism when I was in the seminary back in the 70’s. Your overview has way more detail! Thank you.

@RezaChity-G

4 жыл бұрын

Which church?

I have been hoping for this channel for ages

I was baptized in a Catholic Church that was majority Black, and was fully immersed. This definitely isn’t the norm, but all of these variations are fascinating!

@deusimperator

2 жыл бұрын

Yes, the Didache permits several methods of baptism.

@dnaak

Жыл бұрын

The biggest reason for allowing pouring is that of practicality of spreading the gospel. If you are in the middle of the desert and someone wants to be baptised, it is not practical to require one to be immersed in water. This would allow someone to carry water around and baptise many people in "inhospitable" lands. If it's ok there, then it has to be ok everywhere.

@sueregan2782

Жыл бұрын

@@deusimperator In 1984, I was a member of a new Catholic mostly white congregation. The church building we constructed included a Baptismal pool on the altar platform which allowed the candidate to be immersed or receive pouring.

@mweskamppp

Жыл бұрын

Any catholic can baptise a person with water, however it is aplied. No biggie. To me it is mostly a sign that a person has joined the community.

@Cr7Micto

Жыл бұрын

@@mweskamppp the only norm is that the water touches the head of the one who receives baptism

This is the most thorough video on the topic I have ever seen!

Thanks! Your presentation’s clarity and thoroughness are greatly appreciated!!

@ReadyToHarvest

Жыл бұрын

Wow! Thanks so much Johnny! I am glad to hear that you have liked the channel. Lots more to come!

Dear Joshua, This talk on the origins of different church bodies was excellent. Thank you for all the thought you put onto it, and, in turn, distilling it so clearly. Excellent work, for which I thank you again. Sincerely, Larry Clarence Lewis Ontario, Canada.

@ReadyToHarvest

Жыл бұрын

I appreciate that Larry! Thanks for letting me know how you enjoyed it.

As a Catholic, you gave a pretty fair and well rounded explanation of Baptism. The one fault I did see was the topic of "limbo". In the past, some Catholic theologians have discussed the idea of limbo, but has never been taught by the Church as a doctrine and truth. You cited the Catechism almost directly after bringing up limbo, but failed to note that limbo is nowhere mentioned there. Anyhow, it was a wonderful video.

@FrJohnBrownSJ

2 жыл бұрын

Seems like there's conflation here between the Eastern Catholics and Orthodox. It's unfortunate that the author of the video didn't do his homework. But honestly, I'm not surprised. Most non-Catholic Christians remain pretty misinformed about Catholicism.

@markhorton3994

2 жыл бұрын

Nine months later I came across this again and feel required to disagree. Limbo was official dogma until the infallible, unchangeable Roman Catholic Church changed it. The source I have for this included references to prove this but my memory for details is poor.

@PInk77W1

2 жыл бұрын

@@markhorton3994 limbo, in Roman Catholic theology, the border place between heaven and hell where dwell those souls who, though not condemned to punishment, are deprived of the joy of eternal existence with God in heaven. The word is of Teutonic origin, meaning “border” or “anything joined on.” The concept of limbo probably developed in Europe in the Middle Ages but was never defined as a church dogma, and reference to it was omitted from the official catechism of the church that was issued in 1992.

@ethanmcclain7570

2 жыл бұрын

@@markhorton3994 Limbo has never been dogma or required belief in Catholicism.

@Spartan322

Жыл бұрын

@@ethanmcclain7570 Though Purgatory is.

Thank you so much for making this video! It’s very informative and creative. The transition, colors, lay out and organization was well done.

Well done, sir. I like the way you present these differences objectively without being outwardly judgmental with regard to any specific group.

@karentippets4285

3 жыл бұрын

Except for the ones they left out.

@skillganon606

2 жыл бұрын

@@karentippets4285 the video with every Christian cult would be twenty hours long.

@OuterRimPride

2 ай бұрын

@@karentippets4285 bro if you talk to a thousand different Christians about their beliefs you'll get a thousand different answers. It's not exactly a peer-reviewed science.

very accurate about the denominations I have personal experience with, comprehensive overview. really appreciate it!

Excellent, incredible evaluation, analysis, and comparison, helping easily compare and contrast and understand denomination differences and I truly hope you’ll continue to create similar videos discussing and comparing different positions/issues. Very much looking forward to tour future content!

So this is a series ... I'm excited

Thank you for the research you did on this. I also appreciate the way you present this in a matter of fact way. I just found your KZread channel yesterday.

@ReadyToHarvest

3 жыл бұрын

Thanks Edward! I'm trying to fill some holes in KZread - not a lot of good info on many of these topics.

@denonamp

3 жыл бұрын

@@ReadyToHarvest great stuff. Will you do rapture views or other stuff like this

@ReadyToHarvest

3 жыл бұрын

@@denonamp Yes, eventually. It's a lot of work. I like to do it but finding the time is hard.

I’m impressed. I’ve taught this subject for 40 years and you’ve presented it accurately, fairly, and concisely. It’s clear you did your homework. (I’m from the Restorationist.)

Love your content. It's a rabbit hole of sorts. Keep it up 👍

I am very impressed with how thorough and respectful and varied this was. Well done!

Very interesting and very thorough, thank you! It's especially illustrative of the fact that Christians of all faiths see things differently (I'm Catholic), even though we are trying to see the same thing. It is remarkable how many of us see the others as wrong. That's a human frailty.

*love this series.* it's real cool.

The colors line up perfectly with each denomination, and a rightly impression is left along with the information Excellent Presentation Ready to Harvest

VERY interesting! I look forward to more in this series

@gissie391

3 жыл бұрын

Try reading scripture first. Baptism is not just outward sign..

@SestraVixen

3 жыл бұрын

@@gissie391 I do, but there are some insights that he gave about various denominations that i found intriguing

It would be helpful if you did the same covering Communion/Lord's Supper. Thanks, and really enjoy this ministry!

I greatly admire the level of research you put into these videos. As a former Salvation Army soldier now Anglican (ACNA), I'm glad you brought up the oddness of the Salvation Army's choice to stop baptisms and reject them in the corps as a whole.

@brucealanwilson4121

3 жыл бұрын

Why did the SA stop adiministering Baptism?

@MrAmerininja

3 жыл бұрын

@@brucealanwilson4121 The early Salvationists supposedly felt it was right, together with the Holy Spirit, for the Salvation Army to be a beacon within the church universal to show that one could live a holy life with out external ceremonies.

@brucealanwilson4121

3 жыл бұрын

@@MrAmerininja So, they thought they knew better than Christ, who commanded the Apostles to baptize?

@MrAmerininja

3 жыл бұрын

@@brucealanwilson4121 Implicitly, yes.

@anthonyhulse1248

3 жыл бұрын

@@TorahisLifeandLight DID PAUL TEACH BAPTISM TO THE GENTILES? Romans 6:3-4 Or don’t you know that all of us who were baptized into Christ Jesus were baptized into his death? We were therefore buried with him through baptism into death in order that, just as Christ was raised from the dead through the glory of the Father, we too may live a new life. 1 Corinthians 1:13 Is Christ divided? Was Paul crucified for you? Were you baptized in the name of Paul? 1 Corinthians 12:13 For we were all baptized by one Spirit so as to form one body - whether Jews or Gentiles, slave or free - and we were all given the one Spirit to drink. Galatians 3:26-27 So in Christ Jesus you are all children of God through faith, for all of you who were baptized into Christ have clothed yourselves with Christ. Ephesians 4:5 one Lord, one faith, one baptism Philippians (see Acts 16:33) At that hour of the night the jailer took them and washed their wounds; then immediately he and all his household were baptized . Colossians 2:12 having been buried with him in baptism in which you were also raised with him through your faith in the working

Your channel is great! I apreciate the great effort you have put in to remain unbiased and factual in your presentation. Your channel is a great resource for furthering one's understanding of Christendom at large. I genuinely don't know what denomination you are after watching about a dozen of your videos, which really speaks to your character as a presenter and intellectual. if i was forced to guess i would say you are definitely protestent, and probably some sort of methodist, anglican, or lutheran, with my guesses being in order of confidence.

Great video... thank you for your hard work.

Wonderful video, thank you! As a member of the LCMS, I would like to add that in an emergency, we do allow any person (non Christian or Lutheran) to perform a baptism. We have a quick guide for it at the end of the small catachism. The baptism should then be reported to the local church pastor as soon as possible for recording.

@CatholicTraditional

3 жыл бұрын

Catholic babies may be baptized by anyone else in an emergency (i.e. no priest or deacon available) as long as the proper language and matter (water) are used

@richardbaranzini8805

11 ай бұрын

❤how would a nonchristian perform a baptism

@fighterofthenightman1057

11 ай бұрын

⁠@@richardbaranzini8805As long as they follow the correct method, we’re all God’s children, right? That specific non-Christian might not be saved, but he could help save another!

Brilliant! You guys should do this more for other topics like Salvation, Liturgy, Biblical Authority, etc.

@ReadyToHarvest

3 жыл бұрын

I want to, it's just a ton of work. Planning to continue the series as time allows.

@batuhanaca2214

3 жыл бұрын

I hope you are getting paid for soo much work mate

I'm more than impressed with this presentation.

This is so interesting. I never knew I needed to know this until I watched it.

A ton of research went into this video. I can say the description of what the southern baptist churches do is spot on. Beyond that the only thing I know is there is a profound change that takes place once you're baptized.

I enjoy how neutral these videos are. It's a true learning experience

So helpful! Thanks for the video

Congratulations ! Lot's of Good Work & Stuff to Know. Thanks.

I've been in the Nazarene Church my whole life, and I've never known them to baptize infants. We do 'dedications,' but as far as I've witnessed, no infant baptisms. However, the Nazarene Church is very diverse, some leaning more to the Catholic side. Also, at the dedication, I've seen there be a 'congregational vow' of sorts, where the church promises to help raise the child in the way it should go.

The accuracy is strong with this one...

If I had to pick one favorite channel it would be this one.

Great work explaining! God bless!

I grew up in a denomination that practices believer's baptism by full immersion only. As such, we did not have baptism of babies, but we instead had dedication ceremonies where we pledged to help the child grow in his or her faith (and I understand that most denominations that ascribe to believer's baptism do this.) We had two godparents of each sex (four total) during my youngest cousin's dedication. However, my uncle is a LCMS minister, and I was baptized by him as a baby, though this was intended mostly in the same way as a dedication. When I got older, I was encouraged by other family members to be baptized by immersion if I chose to profess faith, so I was baptized again by full immersion when I was 13. As for my cousin, he was later baptized on his sixth birthday into the LCMS, though I can't recall the method that was used.

This has been very informative! I’m always trying to figure out the differences in denominations. I was raised southern Baptist- then we went to a Nazarene church and I honestly never knew what it meant. Now I go to a southern Baptist church and still question if it’s where I fit in best

@ReadyToHarvest

3 жыл бұрын

Thanks Emily. I have a video on The Church of the Nazarene and what they teach and also have one on Southern Baptists vs Independent Baptists. Maybe they would be helpful. Glad you enjoyed the video!

@3wolfsdown702

3 жыл бұрын

If Mary was visited by an Angel , and was told she was going to be given a virgin birth to the son of God , why would her and her family think Jesus was crazy and needs to be locked up ?????Mark 3:20 through 35 It's time to start using critical thinking

Great video! Love your visuals 😍

Great teaching brother! Very informative!

18:00 Sacraments and Ordinances 19:14 Baptism effect on your Salvation. Most important part of the video!

@katwilliams2950

3 жыл бұрын

Thanks devil! Lol

@TheFrigginDevil

2 жыл бұрын

@@abdultuaheb123 Which version of the Quran is the best for English? Is there an English version of the Quran that all Muslims accept?

@TheFrigginDevil

2 жыл бұрын

@@abdultuaheb123 Which one is better? And no I didn't click the link. And thank you!

Honestly, Christianity has 40k levels of denominations.

@intothekey

3 жыл бұрын

As a Christian and a Warhammer fan I get this reference lol 😂

@Wot50202

3 жыл бұрын

Christ forgives!! Yes….he does.

@FalconOfStorms

3 жыл бұрын

Most differences are minor and don't start a denominational split.

@intothekey

3 жыл бұрын

@@FalconOfStorms Yeah, a good example of this is about 3/4ths of my church hold to the "New Hampshire Baptist Confession of 1853" while the other forth hold to "the Second London Baptist Confession of 1689" But in the end of the day we're all family and get along.

@sebastianbosek5222

3 жыл бұрын

Well, it's mostly protestants with the denominations. They have 33,000 denominations There's only one Catholic and Orthodox church.

hey!! awesome video the rhythm the editing the dedication bravo you should make a serie/ playlist on the difference, focusing on the 7 sacréments as you did for baptism

That's awesome I really need more videos like that one🤩👌

This is probably as exhaustive analysis as one can hope to get on the matter. Well done. As a Reformed person from South Africa, I can vouch that you got the Reformed position 100% right.

@jimd9339

3 жыл бұрын

Calvinism is heresy.

@Hannodb1961

3 жыл бұрын

@@jimd9339 Nope. The Bible is literally drenched it the doctrine of divine election, the only reason why you cant see it is because you have a man centered theology. There are pages and pages of passages I can take you to, but here is one as clear as daylight, and off the beaten track Phillipians 2:13.

@jimd9339

3 жыл бұрын

@@Hannodb1961 You are confused by Calvinism....or should I say Augustinianism? For Calvin followed Augustine...a lost Catholic! Philippians 2:13 For it is God which worketh in you both to will and to do of his good pleasure. Who was Paul writing to? Saved folk. Not lost sinners. Mankind has a freewill. Your complete religion is founded upon mankind NOT having a freewill. Calvinism is easily debunked by debunking that silly heresy. I freely choose to reject Calvinism. My Saviour Jesus Christ the Lord predestined me to be against Calvinism. All 5 points of Calvinism are heretical. Easily debunked. You have to do major mental gymnastics in order to force Calvinism into the Bible.

@Hannodb1961

3 жыл бұрын

@@jimd9339 Oh, the irony, because if you believe in free will, you're actually on the catholic side. The very first debate between Catholicism and Protestantism was on this very issue, and you are standing on Rome's side. I stand on the side of Luther, you stand on the side of Erasmus. Where did Calvyn get his ideas? From Paul, and Paul got it from Jesus. Read John 6, Jesus clearly state that the jews did not merely choose to reject Him, they were unable to come to Him, because they do not belong to Him. Or Acts 13 that says that all who were predestent to eternal life, believed. Or John 1:13, who emphisize 3 times that salvation is not of our will, but we are born from God. And btw, birth is something you had no choice in. Or Ephesians 2:1-10 that clearly state that we were dead in sin, and faith is a gift from God. I can go on and on and on, because the bible is not on your side. Could the Pharoah choose to let Israel go? Did Paul have a choice in his apostleship? Yes, we have will, but that will is bound, not free. In Romans 6 Paul state you are either a slave of sin or a slave of rightiousness. Just like when you give a lion a choice between salad and meat, he chooses meat, because that is his nature. So too, the sinner chooses rebellion against God, and he cannot do any other, because it is his nature. You say you freely chose. Can you freely choose to change your desires? No, you cannot, because your choices are governmened by your desires, not the other way arround. You cannot choose for God unless God places the desire in your heart. The idea of free will is incoherent. If your faith is based on free will, well then there is merit in the act of faith because it is something you do, and it is no longer the product of grace. But James says faith that does not produce good deads is dead, so where does those good deeds come from? If faith is the product of your choice, then so is your deeds. But then there is merit in those deeds as well. What is the minimim amount of good deeds necesary before your faith become invalid? And so, it doesn't take long for you to end up in a Roman Catholic position that sees your salvation as a combination of the merit and grace of Christ, as well as your own merit. You can only truly and coherently believe in grace alone, when both your faith and your works is a gift from God working in you through the Holy Spirit. That is what Jeremiah said when he Said God creates in us a new heart. That is what Jesus taught when He said no one can come to him unless its given to them by the Father, and they shall have eternal life, and that is what Paul taught in Romans 9. Free will is the lie that Satan peddled to Adam and Eve: the idea that we can be sovereign like God. That is why predestination is offensive, even to so many christians, because it strikes at the very root of sin: the notion of human sovereignty.

@jimd9339

3 жыл бұрын

@@Hannodb1961 LOL You are hilarious.... No. Calvin got his heresies from Augustine who got his heresies form the Catholic cult... Calvinism is a cult just like Catholicism. Jesus did not teach that mankind does not have a freewill. The devil made the choice to sin... Adam made the choice to sin. God did not make either of them sin. Here is an example of your reasoning: 2 + 2 is 5 or 2 + 2 are 5? You think that it is an either or thing when BOTH of your answers are wrong. It's not a choice between Catholicism and Calvinism!

From the Kirsopp Lake translation of "The Didache": "1 Concerning baptism, baptise thus: Having first rehearsed all these things, "baptise, in the Name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit," in running water; 2 but if thou hast no running water, baptise in other water, and if thou canst not in cold, then in warm. 3 But if thou hast neither, pour water three times on the head "in the Name of the Father, Son and Holy Spirit." 4 And before the baptism let the baptiser and him who is to be baptised fast, and any others who are able. And thou shalt bid him who is to be baptised to fast one or two days before."

Thank you for this channel you are excellent may the lord our God bless you and give u the spiritual decrement to continue on doing what work he tasks you with. 🌞💕

I've often wondered about some of these things. Thank you.

I grew up Baptist and learned that it's important to study and follow the bible... The most important thing I learned is that the traditions of man and the biblical instructions of God are two different things. But many conflate the two.

@chrysthain3853

2 жыл бұрын

The worst part is those "traditions of man" tend to be pagan in origin. Non-denominational Protestantism is the way.

@JoelRipke

2 жыл бұрын

And that is why I'm a Lutheran (LCMS)

@deusimperator

2 жыл бұрын

Spoken like a veritable dunce... you have not read what those "Traditions" really are. St. Paul tells you to follow the traditions he taught you... So what are these tradition Christ speaks of??? If you are not Jewish you are not going to know. This is legislation enacted a gezerah in the Beit Din Gadol. VERY SPECIFICALLY IT IS #7 enacted by Shammai ... It was abrogated by Gmaliel. One does not receive the faith through a book but through a tradition which is received.

@ItIsWritten777

Жыл бұрын

??? So Romans 10:17 So then faith cometh by hearing, and hearing by the word of God. What if you’re not around people of faith, so you don’t “hear” the word of God? Many people find God in jail, through a book. If you seek Him, you’ll find Him (Matthew 7:7-12)… Proverbs 4:7 Wisdom is the principal thing; therefore get wisdom: and with all thy getting get understanding… Not the understanding from traditions/rituals, which failed man to begin with (That’s why Jesus had to die for us to begin with. If all those laws, rituals, and traditions could have saved us GOD wouldn’t have done what He did to bridge the gap), but seek revelation from GOD… 1 John 2:27-28 Jesus fulfilled all those things when he said what he said in the cross (John 19:30). We live under Grace now (Romans 6:14). 2 Corinthians 3:6

I would like to make a slight correction. Pouring is the norm in the Latin-rite Catholic Church, by the Eastern Catholic Churches all practice primarily immersion

@soundpreacher

2 жыл бұрын

This is primarily because the Greek-speaking world understands the meaning of baptizo.

@DF_UniatePapist

2 жыл бұрын

@@soundpreacher Baptizo does not necessarily mean “immerse”. And the Eastern Catholic Churches aren’t just Greek, they’re also Syriac, Egyptian, Semitic, Slavic, Asian, etc.

@deusimperator

2 жыл бұрын

@@soundpreacher Have you read the Didache prepared by the first Catholics who were ALL Jews??? They provided several methods of performing a baptism. The Christian faith does not originated among Greeks but among the Jewish Catholics. The Jewish Catholics wrote in the rules for carrying out the Jewish mikveh into the Didache. Baptism was how one became Jewish, and the mikveh it is the point of conversion into Judaism.

Ready To Harvest, I'm not certain your name but it is evident that you have the gift of teaching. Thank you for serving Christ by sharing it!

Very good video. Thank you for this awesome source of information. You just earned a new subscriber 😊. Looking forward to seeing more. I love looking into different denominations. Great stuff 👍🤍.

The phrase "emergency baptism" puts a big smile on my face. I can easily imagine a new believer just learning about baptism and needing to be baptized now! I love the energy of new believers 🥰

@StumpfForFreedom

2 жыл бұрын

Ah, I think the "emergency" authorization is more for like "person who is about to die, or very possibly might."

@joegoodman8213

2 жыл бұрын

^Yup. Some think baptism is a requirement for salvation, so it's an emergency for a dying person to get one if they haven't. Excitement and enthusiasm don't qualify as emergencies. Paul's writings make it clear people are saved by grace through faith (Romans 4, Ephesians 2, etc.) and Peter clarifies that water baptism isn't what saves, but rather an answer of good conscience toward God.

@georgepierson4920

2 жыл бұрын

@@joegoodman8213 You just contradicted Peter, good job.

@joegoodman8213

2 жыл бұрын

@@georgepierson4920 He says that in his first epistle, and it agrees with the rest of scripture.

@larrymcclain8874

2 жыл бұрын

Acts 16:33

You did an excellent job condensing a very complicated issue into a very short and concise presentation! Two additions - the Catholic officiant must use the singular 'I' when baptizing. There have been cases where the officiant has stated 'we' baptize and the baptism was invalid. The Catholic Church will also offer ‘conditional’ baptisms for adults who are coming into the church and are unsure of they have been baptized or if their original baptism was valid. Keep up the good work.

I found this fascinating thank you for putting this video together. I grew up in a Baptist Church in southern IL. I was baptized back in 1999 in the Ohio river (the church's baptismal was broken at the time)

Would love for you to put out something like this on the topic of salvation. Great channel, God bless

@ReadyToHarvest

2 жыл бұрын

Thanks Ronald. I would love to do it. Videos like this one are a big task but it is obviously a very important topic.

I am an ordained Salvation Army Officer. Lack of baptism has never been an issue except where I was asked to be the Godparent of a niece in a CoE Church. However, the priest accepted that baptism through the Spirit entitled me to be seen as baptised, and I was okay to become a Godparent.

@PipeDreamerJacques

3 жыл бұрын

If you believe in Christ, why on earth do you not seek out your own baptism?! Our Lord Himself commanded it and submitted to it Himself!

@ndenyer

3 жыл бұрын

@@PipeDreamerJacques the Bible is clear that you can be saved without baptism.

@PipeDreamerJacques

3 жыл бұрын

@@ndenyer With all due respect, your glasses must need cleaning. Jesus Christ HIMSELF said you need to be baptized or you do not have supernatural life within you. This is to say nothing of the great commission where He instructed the apostles to go forth instructing the heathen and baptizing them in the name of the Father, Son, and Holy Ghost. You need to get baptized, and pronto.

@ndenyer

3 жыл бұрын

@@PipeDreamerJacques see (for example) Matt 3:11, Acts1:5. Baptism by the Holy Spirit is as applicable as water baptism according to John the Baptist and Jesus himself. The thief on the cross was not baptised, but was promised he would be with Jesus in paradise. But please note I don’t decry water baptism in any way at all. It’s just not the way in my Church and I currently don’t believe I am missing out because of that.

@ndenyer

3 жыл бұрын

@Party Peetz the Bible is very clear people can be saved without being baptised. And even your example seems to me to indicate the ability and desire to do so at that time. Just to be very clear, I don’t negate the blessing people may feel from baptism, I am simply convinced it not a necessity to salvation or holiness, but an adjunct.

I tried to scan through all of the comments, but I don’t see any comment from an Orthodox Christian. We follow the “Οίκος” (household) model.In the case of emergency baptisms, there is a form, and must be in the name of the Trinity. The same is the case for recognizing other baptisms to receive chrismation, the baptism must have been in the name of the Trinity.

That was amazing, thank you!

You really gave a great explanation

I am Orthodox, and our main mode *should* be by three full immersions, though of course I cannot speak for every parish out there that might do a slight variation. Great content btw

@johndoney2665

2 жыл бұрын

It is not baptism that is important, but doing the things that JESUS taught.

@goodbanter4427

2 жыл бұрын

@@johndoney2665 I respectfully disagree. Both are important.

@deusimperator

2 жыл бұрын

Most Orthodox simply pour... only infants can be totally immersed in most parishes

@goodbanter4427

2 жыл бұрын

@@deusimperator Yes, so that's pouring out of circumstances, not because it's supposed to be poured

@deusimperator

2 жыл бұрын

@@goodbanter4427 FROM WHAT IS AVAILABILITY... IT depends on AVAILABILITY... The Western Church has performed baptism by pouring an option which was permitted, just as in Judaism were SPRINKLING is also permitted.

The act of baptism is a continuation of the Jewish practice of mikvah a ritual washing which was for purification before God. It was a full immersion as a washing.

Thank you. Very informative.

Just found your channel, good stuff!

What might have been an interesting inclusion (assuming of course, that they don't share baptismal beliefs with Eastern Orthodox), is the Nestorian Church (Assyrian Orthdox, The Church of The East, etc...), and the Coptic Church and it's offshoots.

A gentle reminder that baptism was originally rooted in the Jewish Mikvah, which is a ritual bath. It goes all the way back to the deliverance from Egypt and the crossing of the Red Sea. The number of denominations is overwhelming. It’s best to understand the roots of baptism as understood by the original Jewish apostles.

@Really250

3 жыл бұрын

Yes, most sacraments in the catholic/orthodox faith are similar in nature to a Jewish tradition.

@larrymcclain8874

2 жыл бұрын

Christian baptism is a burial (Romans 6:4; Colossians 2:12)

Admirable job covering such an exhaustive (exhausting? ) topic so well and thoroughly. Fine point re: Churches of Christ - there is no formality re: who may perform baptisms. Usually it's a minister or elder....or the one who taught the gospel to the "candidate". Furthermore, i think many of us resist the question, " is baptism necessary for salvation?" (thought we certainly consider it normative. We want to affirm all that scripture says re: baptism but recognize that..."the arm of the Lord is not shortened"....as it were.

awesome video! thanks so much. as a member of the Church of Christ / Christian Churches I can say that you’ve fairly described the general practice, but few of the specifics (officiant, clothing, formula) are standardized or thought to be critical to the validity. for example, the officiant is most common the local minister out of convenience but family or friends often perform the immersion as the spiritual effect is between the candidate and God. clothing is very much based on local preference and convenience. the formula is not standardized, but almost universally includes “in the name of the father son and holy spirit” “for the forgiveness of sin” and “to receive the gift of the holy spirit”.

@ReadyToHarvest

2 жыл бұрын

Thanks Burton and I appreciate your additions.

@elizabeths4371

2 жыл бұрын

agreed- in the CofC it was my baptized father who baptized me after I'd confessed my faith that Jesus Christ who IS the Son of GOD and upon my public confession my dad then baptized me in the Name of the Father Son and Holy Ghost to receive the forgiveness of my sins. It was a long time ago, but thinking back, I'm pretty sure that there was no mention of receiving the gift of the Holy Spirit although the church doctrine considered it a foregone conclusion.

I was raised within the Nazarene denomination. I recall infant and child dedication services, but these were not thought of as being baptisms, more a declaration of the parents and the congregation to raise and teach the child the Christian faith.

@farashahanem

3 жыл бұрын

Yes, I grew up in a Nazarene church from ages 11 to 15, and they did infant dedications, not infant baptism. However, I got out of that denomination and was Scripturally baptized and joined an ABA Landmark Missionary Baptist church at 17, the same denomination my grandfather was raised in. I also remember a single rose was always presented to each of the baby’s parents during dedication. Do you remember that, as well?

@solavita306

3 жыл бұрын

@@farashahanem I don't recall the rose, but maybe that was a practice that that particular congregation liked and included?

I've never heard of several of these categories. It's no wonder things are so confused.

@JeanmarieRod

3 жыл бұрын

How so? These differences have nothing to do with salvation. I call them "intramural arguments" amongst Christians that all serve Jesus Christ.

@aaronjordan7250

3 жыл бұрын

2 John 9 sir. But truthfully all in denominations and their mother the Roman Catholic Church are lost. There are no denominations in the kingdom of God. John 3:5 Jesus answered, Verily, verily, I say unto thee, Except a man be born of water and of the Spirit, he cannot enter into the kingdom of God. Acts 2:38 Then Peter said unto them, Repent, and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins, and ye shall receive the gift of the Holy Ghost. Titus 3:5 Not by works of righteousness which we have done, but according to his mercy he saved us, by the washing of regeneration, and renewing of the Holy Ghost 2 John 9 Whosoever transgresseth, and abideth not in the doctrine of Christ, hath not God. He that abideth in the doctrine of Christ, he hath both the Father and the Son.

@JeanmarieRod

3 жыл бұрын

@@aaronjordan7250 How are all denominations lost if they all believe and follow the verses you listed? You can be either saved or unsaved in any denomination.

@aaronjordan7250

3 жыл бұрын

@Robbie Parker all denominations do not believe or follow the verses I listed. Yea, some may preach acts 2:38. But that is where they stop.

@JeanmarieRod

3 жыл бұрын

@@aaronjordan7250 Can you give a specific example of a Protestant denomination that doesn't preach and follow the above verses you listed?

Excellent video. With so many details, I was expecting you to cover the difference(s), if any, between baptism and christening.

Can I translate your video into Portuguese? This is by far the best video about baptism that I've ever seen!

Romans 6 "We are BURIED with him in baptism."

@thejewishredneckprepper4675

2 жыл бұрын

I am glad you quoted this verse. This verse uses the word him and not them. God is one and not three. God is a him and not a they or them. To be baptized with him according to this verse, one must be baptized in the name of Jesus Christ. Acts 2:38. If not one is not part of the bride of Christ. Most so called cults teach that the God of the Jews is three. This is a lie the Jewish God is numerically one Dt6:4. He is one and his name is one ''Jesus Christ.''

There is a church with over 16 million members, over 8 million members in the USA and you didn’t put them in a category? The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.

@PianoForte9096

3 жыл бұрын

Members of that organization and of the Watchtower Society cannot rightly be called fully Christian, as they do not believe in a single, triune God. The LDS believe in a host of gods and that Jesus is a separate being, despite Him saying "I and the Father are one"; the JWs don't believe that Jesus is God at all, despite Him saying "Before Abraham was, I AM." A good measure on if a denomination is Christian is to see which baptisms the Apostolic Churches consider valid; as long as it's in the Name (singular, yet in a triune understanding) of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit and performed with water, converts to most Ancient Churches don't have to be rebaptized.

@11cmower

3 жыл бұрын

@@PianoForte9096 “I and the father are one”. That’s exactly what we believe. We believe that they are one in purpose but separate beings.

@PianoForte9096

3 жыл бұрын

@@11cmower "In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God." (John 1:1). The rest of John 1 explicitly describes this Word as Jesus. This is why all Christian groups that can trace themselves directly back to the 1st century are Trinitarian -- it is the tradition handed down by the Apostles.

@11cmower

3 жыл бұрын

@@PianoForte9096 who is Jesus talking to in Mark 15:34? Is he speaking to Himself? Also Luke 23:46? We in the Church of Jesus Christ believe He is speaking to his literal Father in Heaven.

@PianoForte9096

3 жыл бұрын

@@11cmower Catholics believe and have believed for nearly two milennia that Jesus is speaking to God the Father, the first person of the Trinity. In doing so, He quotes the first line of Psalm 22, a Messianic prophecy. Jesus is the second person of the Trinity, and the Holy Spirit is the third. These are three distinct persons whose will and substance is unitive in one being. How else can we reconcile that we are supposed to baptize in the name (singular, you can look at the Greek in Matthew 28) of the Father, of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit? How else can we reconcile Jesus clearly proclaiming Himself as God, the Holy Spirit possessing divine attributes, and the truth that there is only one God? The Apostle's Creed reveals how the earliest Christians interpreted Christ's conception: "conceived by the Holy Spirit, born of the Virgin Mary..." and not conceived by the Father. Did you understand my "historical pedigree" argument, or would you like me to repeat it? We have an unbroken chain of authority from the Apostles to today -- so at what exact date could there have been a "Great Apostasy"? Before you answer, try reading the Didache, a Christian document very likely written before John's Revelation. It contains many of the most basic oral traditions.

Thank you for this

Crazy good video!

@ReadyToHarvest

3 жыл бұрын

Thanks! I enjoyed studying to make it.

I wished you used the United Pentecostal Church International for oneness Pentecostals.

@ReadyToHarvest

3 жыл бұрын

Yeah, I actually plan to use them in future comparisons. And will make a general video on UPCI hopefully in 2021.

@hanklhayes

3 жыл бұрын

@@ReadyToHarvest I'm looking forward to this. Great job on this video, btw. Incredible work!

@TurboNFRStwoK

3 жыл бұрын

I’m UPCI as well and would love to see this too.

@Applerumcake

3 жыл бұрын

I thought it was proper for him to use the Pentecostal Assemblies Of the World since the doctrine of baptism in Jesus name was made popular by them. Granted the United Pentecostal Church International is larger, but starting at the root for this conversation is proper. But in practice they both say the same thing: My brother upon your confession of faith in the death, burial, and resurrection of our Lord Jesus Christ, I indeed baptize you in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of your sins: and you shall indeed receive the gift of the Holy Ghost. In Jesus Name.... Yup, was a oneness organ player for decades, I know it by heart. 😆

@gregb6469

3 жыл бұрын

He used the term that most people are familiar with. Most people have no clue what the UPCI is, but most Christians know what oneness pentecostals are.

So no one is going to mention the word "baptize" is a transliteration of the Greek word "baptizo", which means "to immerse"?

@phillipburr2627

2 жыл бұрын

@Григорий Фэша Thanks for your thoughtful, lengthy copy and paste. But I'm not sure what it has to do with my comment. I'm simply saying the word "baptize" essentially means to immerse. Take it for what it's worth.

@dougdrummonds7406

2 жыл бұрын

Did the Pharisees immerse their couches when they baptized them? (Mark 7:4)

@beigemeoli7016

2 жыл бұрын

@@dougdrummonds7406 mark 7:4 is a tradition made from the Jews that after they came home from the market place they must clean themselves and the things they used to eat with, because the fear they touched something “unclean” it would also make them unclean and sick. It’s nothing ceremonial. Also where in mark 7:4 talk ab baptizing couches?

@dougdrummonds7406

2 жыл бұрын

@@beigemeoli7016 the KJV translates “baltizo” to “washing” here, so it isn’t exclusively immersion.

@phillipburr2627

2 жыл бұрын

@@dougdrummonds7406 An unfortunate textual variant. However, you are focusing on the wrong word in this case. Baptizo still means "to immerse" - even in Mark 7:4. The issue here is whether or not "dining couches" was in the original text. Some have it. Some don't. Baptizo = immerse. Why are you determined to prove otherwise?

So very helpful. Thankyou

Was expecting advice on agricultural engineering, stayed for a nuanced explanation of the confusing menagerie of Abrahamic religions. I have seen this kind of energy in science fiction or sport fans, I’d never seen a Christianity nerd before. Bravo

In the Orthodox church, a bishop can baptize too (of course). In case of emergency, any orthodox Christian can perform the baptism, in any kind of liquid (no joke), as long as they are baptized themselves in the Orthodox Church, and they baptize in the Name of the Father, of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit.

@deusimperator

2 жыл бұрын

It has to be water... you cannot get baptized with beer, coke or pepsi

@DraganMej

2 жыл бұрын

@@deusimperator well, it's all about extreme cases

@fluffysheap

2 жыл бұрын

Given how many Catholic/Orthodox there are, it's likely that someone, somewhere, sometime was baptized in beer

@deusimperator

2 жыл бұрын

@@fluffysheap The question regarding baptism with beer came before the CDF long time ago, and the answer was no. But that was beccase some one may have been baptized with beer and a bishop was inquiring if it was valid. The answer was no.

Love this channel and find the information fascinating, but as a Latter-day Saint I'm curious why our denomination is normally ignored in your videos.

@DamonNomad82

3 жыл бұрын

I would say that it's probably due to the fact that most denominations regard the LDS Church as being a completely separate faith, rather than a denomination of Christianity, just as most Jewish denominations do not consider Christianity or Islam to be Jewish denominations.

@zissler1

3 жыл бұрын

We technically fit in the restorationists but the church of Christ is very small compared to the main branch of the church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints. Not sure why he’s include them as they too believe god and Christ are separate, but they no longer use the Book of Mormon.

@DamonNomad82

3 жыл бұрын

@@zissler1 The group listed in the video under "Restorationist" is the Church of Christ (also called the Disciples of Christ), which was founded by Alexander Campbell and Barton Stone in the early 19th century. That church is trinitarian, had nothing to do with the LDS and never used the Book of Mormon. In fact, since its founding, the Church of Christ has held to the saying "No book but the Bible, no creed but Christ," and rejects any teachings outside of the 66 books of the Bible. You seem to be thinking of the COMMMUNITY of Christ, which was part of the LDS until Brigham Young took over leadership after the death of Joseph Smith.

@zissler1

3 жыл бұрын

@@DamonNomad82 The first thing that came up when I searched church of christ was this and this is what I based it off of: www.churchofchrist1830.org/history

@zissler1

3 жыл бұрын

@@DamonNomad82 There is the community of christ but a follower of joseph smith did create a church called church of christ as well.

fantastic video

Well done!

Churches of Christ do not call their ministers a "pastor." Usually it is the minister or preacher, but elders can administer and I've even seen some fathers baptize their children.

@stevenckaroly

3 жыл бұрын

My experience is that any male member can baptize. Commonly the preacher or evangelist that baptizes the person because he's the one that received the person when he/she came forward. I know of no scriptural limitations on the baptizer. Yes, in the churches of Christ, the elders are the pastors. Long ago I heard of elders being called bishops after 1 Timothy 3:1. One local church calls their elders shepherds.

That statement from the PCA denying any salvific efficacy in baptism is so depressing. Our confessional standards explicitly state, ““by the right use of this ordinance, the grace promised is not only offered, but really exhibited, AND CONFERRED, by the Holy Ghost, to such (whether of age or infants) as that grace belongs unto, according to the counsel of God’s own will, in His appointed time.” - Westminster Confession of Faith 28.6 The Reformed are not to deny that grace is conferred in baptism but ought to qualify that it is only conferred to the elect as it must be received in a Spirit given faith. In other words, as the Spirit draws you to appeal to God for a good conscience, the Spirit saves you through baptism.

@oracleoftroy

3 жыл бұрын

I agree. I was hoping he would give a reference so I could check if there was some subtlety in the PCA article being missed.

After watching a number of your videos it appears to me as a Swedish Lutheran, albeit a non-believer, that there are significant differences between the teaching and practices of the Church of Sweden and American Lutheran churches. The part of this video that made me react was first of all the very strong practice of having godparents in the Church of Sweden but from what I understand Lutheran churches in the US seemingly doesn't empathise this practice. I would be interested in a video where you compare Lutheranism outside of the US to the one existing within the US. Thank you for your videos, they are very educational!

Fun Stuff! Lots of good gameboard material here. Baptism with the organ playing is good stuff!!!

The name "Roman Catholic" is incorrect. There is ONE Catholic Church, consisting of twenty-three Rites, one of which is the Latin Rite. This is frequently, and mistakenly, referred to as "Roman" by those who don't know better. Should be Latin Rite Catholic Church.

@alhilford2345

3 жыл бұрын

@Pat Lance : Sorry to disappoint you, but that is a heresy. The Orthodox broke away from the Catholic Church. Go back to your history books.

@theashianz3562

3 жыл бұрын

Here we go!! To apostates & cults arguing each other xD

@Really250

3 жыл бұрын

What are the 23 rites.

@chimeremnmaozioko17

Жыл бұрын

Actually Latin rite Catholic refers to the western Catholic Church, those who use the western rite. The church however is the Catholic Church

You always miss the oriental churches. The old churches are Catholics, Orthodoxes and Orientals (Coptic, Arminians, Ethiopians, Eritreans and East Assyrians) they are Oriental Orthodox. Not part of the Catholics nor orthodoxy

@brucealanwilson4121

3 жыл бұрын

You forgot the Malankara Christians of India.

@davidbhaskara6880

3 жыл бұрын

Theres a lot of Apostolic Churches. Orthodox Church, Roman Catholics, Eastern Catholic, non Calcedon Church, non Efesian Church, etc. But I think our Bible interpretation is much more similar than the 19th-20th century denomination.

@croatiangambler8059

3 жыл бұрын

A lot of those have come back into communion with rome interestingly

@gregb6469

3 жыл бұрын

His focus is on churches/denominations which have significant presense in the U.S. There are very few Oriental churches in the U.S.

@thekingofsomewhere

3 жыл бұрын

@@croatiangambler8059 No, the Oriental churches are not in union with the bishop of Rome. There are some Eastern Catholics who use the rites of the Oriental churches. Not exactly the same though because of Latin influence.

Good job!!!

Very informative