⚙ Want to know more about the latest tech and innovations? Don’t Miss Out! *SUBSCRIBE & HIT THE BELL* 👉bit.ly/SubscribeNowIE

The name Leonidas is articulated in the way Greeks say it, which I guess is the "right" way. This is a really nice touch and attention to detail. Contrast it to the 300 movie articulation of the name.

5km of range is so fucking good. You could place a device like this in the frontline and say good bye to any kamikaze drone

@Black-tc8mk

6 ай бұрын

And then an ATGM is going for you. They need more range or they going to be destroyed in seconds

@OFFCODEV2

5 ай бұрын

​@@Black-tc8mk 3 miles is good

@TheRealBillBob

5 ай бұрын

First of all no. that's not how warfare works. These devices can't be on 24 hours a day. They are no different than air defense systems, which also can't be on 24 hours a day. and I'm guessing these things are probably expensive. so they're not going to be placed all over the place.

@TheRealBillBob

3 ай бұрын

He said the front line, so presumably he was referring the groups within range.@@fishy2939

@digimaks

3 ай бұрын

Claiming 5 KM, and showing 50 meters effect in the cideo - it's quite a HUGE difference, you know... Besides such powerful microwave systems will be visible on the radars with HUUUUUGE footprint, making them very volnurable to ANY artillery and mortar fire.

I'd love to see the sources of these videos. It sounds like it was directly lifted from some marketing material.

@ObjectiveMedia

6 ай бұрын

Indeed

@Austin-cx2xe

6 ай бұрын

Instead of commenting, do 10 minutes of research. Also anyone with half a brain knows that an AI video is NEVER a source of information.

@hate-chan4369

6 ай бұрын

Microwave weapons aren’t new. It was only a matter of time before they were used on drones. They were previously used on humans, but it didn’t work well on us.

@__logan__duvalier__

5 ай бұрын

100% marketing BS in reality these systems are extremely expensive and ineffective

@hate-chan4369

5 ай бұрын

@@__logan__duvalier__ that’s not true. Only the R&D costs money. Energy weapons will be way cheaper my dude in full production

I missed the word ‘anti’ and icl my first thought was drones with microwaves 🤔 maybe Ubereats will start use this and I can finally get a McDonald’s delivered hot for once 😂😂

@marshalllapenta7656

6 ай бұрын

No

How the f could ammo costs surpass the cost of a 10 Million Dollar Tank?...

I would try a powerful air jet like a leaf blower.

Must attack in different angles and directions. That's it

Is there any reference in this videos?

@santka3739

6 ай бұрын

Don't be sure to your drone swamp too much 😂

@Cyclonit

4 ай бұрын

Nope. Its likely AI generated garbage.

ive seen IDF has it actually on the front lines

@santka3739

6 ай бұрын

Have a doubt, it's more likely you have seen Iron Dom standard grid array radar - they visually looks similar. 🇮🇱💪🇺🇦✌️

Oh yeah I’ve been speculating that this directed energy weapon made much more sense than lasers using it against humans it has the capability of incapacitating large amount of people in one shot large number of drones electronic components could be taken out of the fight with out concentrating a laser beam to burn down one drone well at least until A.I.drones come in line

then anti jammer drone will be invented...human is so advanced in adaptation..

All it takes is a Faraday Cage to block those waves. Seems like a minor and cheap modification to drones. Some chicken fence wrapped around the motors and mother board would probably do it.

@Jul676869

6 ай бұрын

Not with that power

@TrangleC

6 ай бұрын

@@Jul676869 I take it you have forgotten your 5th grade physics lessons.

@mateusb09

6 ай бұрын

1- if the microwave beam is potent enought, it could penetrate through gaps in the fence and overcome that shielding effect 2- Wrapping a chicken fence could greatly increase the drone's signature to radars, making it more vulnerable against radar-guided machine guns like Gepard 3- The fence holes diameter would need to be smaller than the microwave length, which is not always feasible 4- They would also need to be lightweight and attached in a way that does not affect the drone's flying capabilities 5- Any gaps, holes or improper attachment could provide a path to the microwave beam to reach the drone's internal components 6- wrapping a fence around a drone it's not an easy task as you could easily block the drone's communication with its land operator Nice you had a lot of physics lessons but it seems like you skipped the engineering ones

@TrangleC

6 ай бұрын

@@mateusb09 I indeed skipped a lot of lessons, but I still know that there are all sorts of EM shielded devices in use and that we are not talking about magical science fiction high tech here. Microwave ovens wouldn't be a thing if you couldn't shield them. Aircraft are shielded against EMP. Most military electronics are. I was only bringing up chicken wire fence to point out that this can even be done as a simple retrofit to existing drones, but it wouldn't be a problem to just incorporate proper shielding into drones during their manufacturing. I bet those larger drones they use to clear overland electrical wires are already shielded that way. And antennae can be protected with spike protection fuses, so that they let through regular signals but block everything that would be potent enough to fry the electronics.

@johnmoser1162

6 ай бұрын

@@mateusb09 Argh ... another idiot with highschool degree talking above his pay grade.

Outrageous this could harm some birds 😮

Pretty dumb to show Skynex, the first ever system of which has been deployed just weeks ago, when talking about about traditional systems and the countermeasure being more expensive than the drone - when one $500 Skynex shell can destroy a dozen drones - as seen in the very shot taken from above, by propelling a cone of tiny tungsten balls into the target area. I also wonder why the developer chose not to show exactly what everyone wants to see - the system downing even a single drone. Probably because it takes several seconds to have an effect, like the Skyranger's underpowered HEL, especially at longer distances. Also fail to see how this is so much less dangerous. Say it's used in a non-combat setting, like protecting the World Cup, and a private plane passes through the ray somewhere behind the drone, causing even a minor malfunction.

@andrewyork3869

4 ай бұрын

A plane shouldn't be flying that low over a major city ever.... An air plane at the edge of the range should be fine due to shielding. However, that becomes less true the closer it gets. Remember, these drones don't have the weight margins for the same level of shielding as aircraft.

Lol microwaves can be shielded by aluminum foil that's slightly charged 😂 ffs

@papa-dt1cv

2 ай бұрын

So if a drone surface is Aluminium, no effect? Tested?

Outdoor birds BBQ. Poor wild living creatures , birds.

@santka3739

6 ай бұрын

Why do you focus on them? Do you blind and not seen optical aiming station for operator?😂

Iron drome

laser is not kinetic

Ok, now send them to Ukraine for "extensive field testing".

@vonilao2209

Ай бұрын

they cant, because it is only effective 5 meters away ,,

@Sombody123

Ай бұрын

@@vonilao2209 This isn't the home appliance from your kitchen.

Crap ... never heard of faraday cage ?!

@santka3739

6 ай бұрын

Did you learn new word 😂

@greggrimer354

5 ай бұрын

They need to be earthed to be effective

@johnmoser1162

5 ай бұрын

@@greggrimer354 airplane ???? [edit] cars ???? ... how f*** dumb are you ???

Above 5km ??

@santka3739

6 ай бұрын

Below 😂 Yes. In range, did you not see?

@digimaks

3 ай бұрын

I doubt that.

i dont like AMERICAN STYLE ,, published the theory, but THE ACTUAL IS 5 YEARS AWAY

‏weapon that really exceeds its owner! But if it's realistic, not propaganda!

@santka3739

6 ай бұрын

What is your doubts? 🤔

@galvinstanley3235

3 ай бұрын

​@@santka3739The problem with this technology is the power output you would need to keep this thing running,and you can only use it in one direction.Jamming requires much less power and can jam in all directions not just have to focus on one direction.

@santka3739

3 ай бұрын

@galvinstanley3235 wow! Aren't you a bicycle creator? 🤔

Just approach at ground level.

@santka3739

6 ай бұрын

Aha, UNDER-ground 😂

Deick

Suuuure, always optimistic videos that trying to make it sound like its the new invincible wunderwaffe. 1) showing vidoe sof drones being downed at 100 Ft range, while claiming it as effective at 5 KM range. of course... Using it on frontlines is impossible, since 5 km is nothing even to tank guns and artillery. 2) they can't operate 24/7, they are very power-intesive. 3) their huge microwave footprint will be visible on any radar. 4) their microwave activity will cause cancer and neurological damage to all personel near it. (previously known cases)

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 Not one has been tested in any combat setting - even simulated/experimental ones - but sure, the 'future' of anti-drone tech...! 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

@santka3739

6 ай бұрын

How do you know/sure of it? 😄 Do you know everything in the World? 😂

@shantanusapru

6 ай бұрын

@@santka3739 Yes. What a m0r0n!

@LrdBxRck

3 ай бұрын

Pretty sure it's the future of anti personal tech

if you guys had a woman narrating you’d get more views btw

This sounds utterly useless, sorry

@santka3739

6 ай бұрын

Of course, mr.xPerd 😂

@nimruil337

6 ай бұрын

@@santka3739 ahahahaha so funny 🤣🤣

@santka3739

6 ай бұрын

Every funny have some funny 😁 When strikes the things he knows nothing about.

@nimruil337

6 ай бұрын

@@santka3739 Yes, I agree with you 😃

They do not can atack with antiradiation missiles???🥸