Awesome video ! I love it so much . Thank you for sharing . When you know about the universe , you know also about the habitable planets existing in it , and the origin of aliens lives , and the humen beings , animals etc. living on earth . Happy week-end to you !

It may be much older, however, our Perceptions in 3 dimensions could be different. Even our instrumentations may have to be adjusted to measure distances at a different frequency.

The speed of light, gravity, electricity and charge are generally considered to have basic elementary values that are universal and constant in time. If one opens up the possibility that they may vary in time, one also opens the possibility that they are not universal, unless there were some underlying mechanisms that controlled their temporal variations, thus keeping them spatially universal. I would think that such mechanisms are beyond what the proponents of variable speed of light et cetera have considered.

@maloio6425

Ай бұрын

Gravity varies time

Try looking at bubble mechanics as a proxy to understand a multiverse. A multiverse with infinite bubble universes. Some popping into and out of existence. A bubble that is near another bubble, when it pops, sometimes it's contents enter a nearby bubble making it larger. You can hear the fizzle of bubbles popping. If you had a sensitive enough detector on 1 bubble you would be able to hear or feel a distant bubble popping. I believe this fizzle, if there is a multiverse, will be detectable engrained in gravitational waves.

@nofacee94

2 ай бұрын

bubble doesn't literally mean bubble

Realy I like this video its interestyng

that's 4,450,000 lifetimes for a 6000-year-old Earth.

@Gr22nRage

10 ай бұрын

Is the earth 6000 years old?

@MrLourie

10 ай бұрын

@@Gr22nRage No. Absolutely NOT. It's at least 4.5 Billion years old.

@smgdfcmfah

10 ай бұрын

@@MrLourie According to current scientific consensus, you mean. Don't worry, I'm not arguing in favour of a 6,000 year old (or flat!) earth, I'm just saying that such numbers really are hard to discuss in absolutes for such a young species with such a new understanding of physics on a video that's talking about the Universe possibly being twice as old as we though it was a few weeks ago!

@MrLourie

10 ай бұрын

@@smgdfcmfah I feel determining the age of the Earth is one thing, it's under our feet. Determining the age of the entire universe is another thing. The universe actually being twice its age doesn't affect the age of the planet Earth itself.

@smgdfcmfah

10 ай бұрын

@@MrLourie Agreed, I'm simply pointing out that what we take as "fact" or scientifically proven can often turn out to be completely wrong once new theories come to light and are proven to be more accurate. What if someone figured out that our entire process of radiometric dating methods was incorrect and proved it?

Could it be that Webb is observing a second 'bubble universe' that is somehow interacting with our known universe? Could that account for the older galaxies?

@rohannashikkar810

9 ай бұрын

honestly thats a fascinating and creative thought.But The current belief is that only gravity can travel between two bubble multiverses.Light or EMR should not be able to travel from 1 bubble mulitverse to another and JWST is seeing EMR.

@p3ggy80

9 ай бұрын

@@rohannashikkar810 thank you for that insight.

@handledav

9 ай бұрын

no.

*_Nothing_* beats the greatest brainchild of the human brain-the scientific method, whose foundation is math and whose solid yet pliable backbone is the fusing of constructive criticism, rigorous skepticism, a vivid imagination, and above all the consuming curiosity of a child. 💕☮🌎🌌

What is the name of the movie in beginning of video

@goofyahhh254

5 ай бұрын

Theory of everything; movie about Stephen hawking's life

Wait a minute… we can’t be seeing planets forming today unless they are forming within the distance that light can travel within a day. What we are seeing today in our fancy telescopes are astronomical events that occurred millions and billions of years ago. Right?

@petergaskin1811

10 ай бұрын

Yup. The farther you look, the older the stuff that you see.

@petergaskin1811

10 ай бұрын

Today we see things billions of light years away that formed billions of years ago. We are always looking into the past.

@margaretford1011

10 ай бұрын

@@petergaskin1811 Thank you. I guess he just worded that in a less than clear manner.

There’s a lot of clever comments on here

The most distan galaxies are more bigger in terms of angular diameter than the other ones more closer to the Milky Way, according to Webb telescope data, too many explanations about that but actually nobody knows what really cause that effect

I have a dumb question. Why can't the new galaxies that have been seen actually be moving in the opposite direction. I mean when you blow something up on the ground it goes up 1 something blows up in space it goes in every direction.

The one question,no matter how hard the scientists tried, will not be answered, and that is,how did it all start, and where did it all come from?

@smgdfcmfah

10 ай бұрын

Magic, obviously.

@eagleeyes6642

10 ай бұрын

It all started in the Mind of God and it all comes from the Spoken Word of God..."Let there be"😃

Just because we can see the light from these distant galaxies does it really mean they are there at the present moment

What happened to the idea of the universe being 13.7 billion years old. Why did it change to being double that age

What if Universes are similar to black holes and can merge when they come into contact

Everything we think we know now could change in an instant. 10 years from now or a hundred years from now or even a thousand years from now which is only a micro second amount of time. We may never really know but science is definitely teaching us all the time that we don’t know as much as we thought we knew.

@timmy-wj2hc

10 ай бұрын

That's the purpose, to expand our knowledge, and simultaneously expand the limit our ignorane.

@donaldkasper8346

10 ай бұрын

Science is a set of generalities that are all false, but socially accepted for a certain period of time until replaced by a newer false reality.

@matt93974

9 ай бұрын

@@timmy-wj2hc Right but we can never conclusively know anything thus human knowledge will always be subjective to some degree.

As humans, we search for a beginning - end for any system, we need a continuation to everything, we search for beauty to every geometrical structure. Our brain is wired in that way, Or, Evolution by natural selection designs our species with that particularity. May be, this would be the way how science works. This would be the way our universe evolving. It needs a beginning to explain itself (as an assumption in mathematics). "Our universe is evolving through us".

@timmy-wj2hc

10 ай бұрын

We are the Universe.

@stevensmith797

10 ай бұрын

to understand a beggining or end of any system is to understand that system better , thats why we look for and begging or end , thats what we do because we,ve found it works

@lynby6231

4 ай бұрын

@@timmy-wj2hcputs me in mind of a song 😊 oh no that’s ‘We are the world”

We can't estimate the age of our universe because there are unlimited ancient galaxies beyond our universe. We can only study on how our universe works .

@blacklyfe5543

10 ай бұрын

Wrong we can estimate the agreement of the universe because we can measure and have mutiple experiments to determine it like the big bang and the cmb

@handledav

9 ай бұрын

no. only lies.@@blacklyfe5543

📍6:13

What if the speed of light varies over time?

@J0ker0314

10 ай бұрын

That'd be insane if the speed of light has decreased gradually since the beginning... It'd change all of physics

@smlanka4u

10 ай бұрын

High-density medium slows down the speed of light, and it increases the age of the universe. The universe had a period of contraction similar to the period of expansion. The duration of a great cyclic period is called a Maha-Kalpa.

@HaraldMacGerhard

10 ай бұрын

So if there is an infinite number of ”bubble universes”…. what do we have between them, and what are the laws of physics here? 🤔 I assume the laws of physics are random in a given Universe so the laws may be very different from Universe to Universe 🙃

@donaldkasper8346

10 ай бұрын

I don't think of expansion slowing light or light losing energy over time. I think of all the photons from other stars interfering with that photon from the star we are studying and realizing the farther it travelled, the more interference it encountered. So called light filaments might be clusters of light diffusion from interference patterns due to local galaxies with more light. It is possible there is an upper limit a photon can travel before being fully attenuated by the light of other stars. This means you can have a static, nonexpanding universe and stars farther away have much more light attenuation in terms of phase. Furthermore if you aim a telescope at a star and study the light in that direction does not prove that the light you obtained comes from that star and not other stars near it you cannot see or other stars out of the direction of view, reflected or refracted into your direction of view.

@donaldkasper8346

10 ай бұрын

@@CarlynLei If space has local densification, then it probably has reflection and refraction behaviors of incident light upon it, and our socalled map of the universe is the result of all those distortions but the stars are actually in very different places. Then all of a sudden you can look at galaxies as local densification lensing of stars as though they are concentrated in a place when they actually aren't and the galaxies are not real, that is their structure is actually the densification layout, not star layout.

Nothing to do with this video but I have a thought . If a Star is in fact heavy enough to bend space , and a black hole likewise is so heavy light can't escape. What way is space bending in. Because if it does weigh enough to bend the fabric of space, this means that there is a top and bottom of space like there is gravity in the universe so there is an up and down.

@timmy-wj2hc

10 ай бұрын

Space is flat

@josephintravaia7670

10 ай бұрын

@@timmy-wj2hc so if that is , then which way do stars sink. Like a bowling ball on a trampoline? Or like pushing a bowling ball upwards from under the trampoline? And who's to say it's not going sideways like a volleyball hitting the net?

@timmy-wj2hc

10 ай бұрын

@@josephintravaia7670 I understand your question, but I think you are thinking about it from our perspective on Earth. Space just stretches, it is a 3d space plus time. Which the overall shape being a flat universe. To answer your question, you would have to be outside of space, if it is even conceivable, to know where space bends into. I think it is stretching on itself, and not going anywhere.

@josephintravaia7670

10 ай бұрын

@@timmy-wj2hc all I'm asking is any objects with extreme amounts of mass bend the space around them. Like a black hole . So if it is bent like the ball on the piece of fabric then what is causing it to bend a certain way/direction. Is there something pulling it down like we are in space but there is a gravity source pulling it in a certain direction ⬇️ ? No matter what we see from any angle it should always look the same . But if we observe a black hole from different angles the blah hole always seems to have a part that seems like the down side . As with the few pics of the black hole that took .

@myrlyn1250

10 ай бұрын

That apparent up/down is kind of a visual trick, partly because of the accretion disk around the black hole (and sometimes the relativistic jets,) but mostly because that's how humans are used to seeing things. A large mass warps space from all directions towards the center of the mass. So, visualize the "heavy weight on a sheet of rubber," but twisted in a million different directions and superimposed on itself.

If James webb says it 27.6 million years old ,than it must be wrong

@blacklyfe5543

10 ай бұрын

Billion

What if it like reversed a Bit (like a few billions years or so) already and like, expanded again like a wave would... Would the time it spent reversing count as part of its ageing experience?

What! I thought we believed the Sun was the center of the universe at one time. How did we build on that?

It never seemed that the age of our solar system is only 4 +- billion years old and the age of the universe was 13+- years old made any sense. 26 billion years makes more sense.

@rorykeegan1895

10 ай бұрын

No it doesn't ... That's just silly

Why don't Yo, Sir, tell that a single foton is faster that a single RADIO WAWE caring a signal that should travel at the same speed is slower, of course a fraction of a millisecond, but is slower.

be careful about opening Pandoras box you might not like what you find 👈

I guess science makes scientific guesses and then presents the round about guess .🤔

Or why say we don’t know how old. Instead of making guesses

Did you know that when you see the sun you are seeing it as it was 8 minutes before. The closest star is so far that when you look at it you are seeing it as it was 4 years ago. You are literally looking in the past. Insane.

@hmq9052

10 ай бұрын

Another fact I like. If our sun was the size of a pea - so you could only see the earth under a microscope - our nearest sun at this scale would be a 2 and half hour drive away

@timmy-wj2hc

10 ай бұрын

Some stars that you see have already exploded and no longer exist.

There are no walls. There is infinite biggness and infinite smallness.

Everything we believe is wrong. And the reason is we are always limited.

@bennylloyd-willner9667

3 ай бұрын

Well, if you believe that we are wrong about everything... ...then you're wrong😊

Our brains aren't limited to the information it receives, but how we process it is. This is why we need to embrace AI if we want non bias theories based on factual data.

@johnmarkson1998

10 ай бұрын

embracing AI is how all previous alien societies seemed to have died. we must not repeat the same mistakes as our ancestors. WE DONT NEED to know how old the universe is. humans cant get greedy. lets just focus on survival.

Imagine an endless series of 'Big Bangs.' Going back & going forwards, Time having no meaning..Could this result in countless iterations of Einsteins & Elvis Presleys..?

That means; Einstein is right and he is our border. Now we need to start from Einstein and beyond..

What if it’s two galaxies or An Parallel universe One spinning clockwise the other one spinning counterclockwise..Acting on one another almost like positive or negative.And the big bang was nothing more then the collision of the two I called this the Virtue Vortex theory

Maybe the universe just wakes up one morning and says, "I think I'm 26 billion years old today" and another morning wakes up and says "I'm thirteen billion years old today". Who is he to tell the universe how old it should be?

@kdreamscosmos4279

6 ай бұрын

The universe is much older than 26 or 13 b

Look at the stars including the sun,look at their shape of gases, look at the carbon and iron "sulfide"? I that star, would it create light or keep it eternally and the heat from the light or magnesium makes that giant diamond with iron stay lit until it cools. If all stars exploded,much more debris would have been found we still can see all stars through each others and has groups. Size matter, and radium of 108 times, if it was cooled In space,would have been much more efficient. Mostly as a blackbody.

the universe is infinity old

Why the assumption that if you rewind the universe that it goes to a point. That’s based on what?? You knew the positions of galaxies 10 billions ago??

What is the age of the universe? No one has a clue. May be infinite.

So how old is it then?

A mind blowing 13.8 billion year old snap shot, why does science push a 27 billion expansion universe on me ? 13 billion is more than enough saying time space has been constant the entire time. Mind you I perceive science to be measuring the snap shot with the foot of a dead King and a Hammer.

How about it was always here and always will be, done. Thanks 👍

Doesn't this make our planet older, then?

Unearthed??seriously? How geocentric are we? And lightyear, just hilarious..

The answer is 42.

Bring back the previous narrator please!

When are scientists going to figure out that the changes in the measures of time and distance due to the amount of gravity in the vicinity change the speed of light? In keeping with God’s promise, we are looking forward to a new heaven and a new earth, where righteousness dwells.

48 trillion years Niell.....and not a day younger !!

Could it be that the whole of the Universe and Universes beyond and our existence on Earth are all just part of a computer program with computer generated infinite outcomes and scenarios? A puzzle that we, as short lived particles that can primitively collate and rationalise information, are trying to solve but in the grand scheme of things are inconsequential and ultimately disposable in individual multiverses?

Woow no sheldon??

God is freaking awesome.

The age of the true universe (beyond the observable universe) is most likely infinite.

@Brammy007a

10 ай бұрын

The term "finite and unbounded" is used. This is what a 2d creature on a 3d globe would experience. Now increase the dimensions by 1.

@Astrophile2345

10 ай бұрын

It has to be !!

@Brammy007a

10 ай бұрын

@@Astrophile2345 "has to be"? How so?

@blacklyfe5543

10 ай бұрын

That's impossible because there was a beginning

@Seventh7Art

10 ай бұрын

@@blacklyfe5543 There was never a beginning.... The big bang only initiated this visible cosmos, not the entire universe = multiverse.

Physical reality is not solid. It fluctuates. Even the melting point of metals change over time, by as much as a degree. Everything is vibration...I wanna fart in space.

Hello - Einstein was wrong. The Universe never had an origin. Therefore it will never end. The Days and Nights of Brahma never had a commencement and therefore will never conclude for all Eternity. That is the new understanding of the Universe which is age-old.

HEY NEIL! so.... if tweezing eyebrows and putting on blush is woman, thennis eating watermelon and loving grape soda black? just checking which stereotypes are ok these daze.. 🧿

this Universe has no age because it is not a living thing, it has always been here and always will, this Universe is timeless, ageless

@beaconoflight8298

10 ай бұрын

​@@noself7889​I don't wanna sound rude but could you be more specific? What do you mean by a self aware universe?

@beaconoflight8298

10 ай бұрын

Okay that's a line of thought. I way I like to think of a conscious universe is in terms of life. Not that the universe is living or that it has souls or qualities; qualities because in Hindu philosophy matter is believed to possess three qualities - goodness, passion, and darkness, that is the sattva, raja, and tama gunas (as per wikipedia). But a different translation of the gunas can also be virtue, action, and inaction. I do not want discuss upon the merits of such philosophy for I am no philosopher. But I have a degree in Physics so I essentially see the world on the basis of physical theories. Sorry for making this a long comment. As I was saying, my views of a conscious universe rests upon the presence of life. If life is universal, if conscious, thinking, sentient beings exist in places other than earth, proliferating across distant galaxies, then the universe can be deemed conscious through life. Since we are made of the same atoms as stars or planets, so through us, the universe experiences itself. Here's an article about panpsychism www.scientificamerican.com/article/does-consciousness-pervade-the-universe/#:~:text=According%20to%20panpsychism%2C%20consciousness%20pervades,that%20literally%20everything%20is%20conscious. @@noself7889

In other words *the Big Bang is not falsifiable!* Then what about this: *BIG BANG* Falsified by Gravity: 1. Big Bang assumes energy and matter from nothing in a quantum singularity or fluctuation 2. The density is quoted variously as extreme to infinite 3. The total mass of the universe curves space and shapes the universes destiny 4. Black Holes have an escape velocity at their event horizon equal to the speed of light 5. The size of a Black Hole is measured by its mass which gives the diameter of the event horizon 6. The mass of the universe is ~1e80 protons = 6.7e53 Kg 7. The formula for escape velocity = (2GM/r)^0.5 Therefore r = 2GM/v^2 8. Given M = 6.7e53 Kg and v = 3e8 m/sec therefore Dia = 2.r = 52.5 billion light yrs 9. The universe cannot at any time have been smaller than 52.5 billion light yrs in diameter 10. This is called the Schwarzschild's Radius of any mass and is well known 11. Adding Dark Matter to this only compounds the problem so is also falsified 12. Hence the matter in the universe can only have been created *after the expansion of space..* 13. The separation of space and mass is unique to the Genesis account of creation! *The Big Bang is falsified as a violation of the law of gravity! Q.E.D.*

Neil deGrasse Tyson is not a scientist facts don't matter only feelings.

@bennylloyd-willner9667

3 ай бұрын

He has degrees from Harvard and other universities, and is an astrophysicist with a doctorate. Pretty much a scientist in my book. I don't agree with all his theories he subscribes to, but he is still a scientist.

Think about how many grossly arrogant people who died thinking that the universe was created by a big bang and not by God. Wasted souls who manifested false arrogant imaginations.

I really dnt agree with Neal I think he’s hypnotized well

Neil! What is a Woman?

Why do we show the cosmos in a tubular representation with ourselves approximately 13 billion years out in one given direction from the big bang. Surly the big bang should represent the center of the cosmos with galaxies radiating out in all directions from its epicenter like the circular ripples in a pond. This being the case, galaxies spewed out at 90 degrees to our specific trajectory from the big bang, would on the hypotenuse, appear older than the big bang itself as their light would take longer to reach us from that angle?

@rorykeegan1895

10 ай бұрын

"Why do we show the cosmos in a tubular representation" Because its a diagram showing progress against time? ...Its not a photograph!.

@birdolla4441

10 ай бұрын

@@rorykeegan1895 I get the diagram and progress of time representing our particular trajectory from the epicenter but my point remains the same

We just dont know its a fact.

@petergaskin1811

10 ай бұрын

That is why science is real and religion is not. Scientists can say - "we don't know". And then go looking for answers. Religions say that they have all the answers - "magic". No, no. Nothing to see here.

doesnt this guy hurt helpless little planets?

@bennylloyd-willner9667

3 ай бұрын

If you mean he was part of large group of scientists who redefined what a "planet" is, then yes. Not by himself tho😊

@bennylloyd-willner9667

3 ай бұрын

Not by himself, no. If you mean that he was part of a group of scientists that redefined the learning of "planet", then yes😊 (I know you made a joke, but someone might actually think he did it all by himself)

Guess the The Age of the Universe from the 2 Verses from the Holy Qur'an given below: Your Guardian-Lord is Allah, who created the heavens and the earth in six Days, and is firmly established on the Throne (of authority): He draws the night as a veil over the day, each seeking the other in rapid succession: He created the sun, the moon, and the stars, (all) governed by laws under His Command. Is it not His to create and to govern? Blessed be Allah, the Cherisher and Sustainer of the Worlds! Surah 7: Al-Araf Verse 54 Say: Is it that you deny Him Who created the earth in two Days? And do you join equals with Him? He is the Lord of (all) the Worlds. Surah 41: Fussilat Verse 9 How was the answer determined?

all i know is we are in a Matrix.. everyone has his own universe.

@donaldbird1005

10 ай бұрын

@Oshadorin

10 ай бұрын

Much obliged.

@JacobLM42

10 ай бұрын

🤡

@Astrophile2345

10 ай бұрын

Source : The matrix 😂

Silly...

We can look forward to a number of additional Ptolemy's rings before physics falls backwards into the answer.

We don't know where the universe ends and you fools think you know how old it is... common sense people

no matter how logical, how analytical, how philosophical , how reasonable, mathematically BUT human intelligence, ability have a limitation, the more these scientists try to theorize the more mistakes they will make which to show how much flaws we are as human, this Universe is beyond our comprehension no matter how smart we are. Math and Physics dont solve everything in life and Universe

Why not multiply by three or four? Or go back to the Bible? Ask Jesus. He will tell you how old it is. He took his apostles out into the desert and pointed to Andromeda and the half trillion stars in that spiral nebula and told them about all the lost souls there.

The channels spreading misinformation sigh...

I don't trust this man like I don't trust Prof Brian Cox. The end

@petergaskin1811

10 ай бұрын

How can you trust or distrust anyone when you can't understand what they're saying?

lol what a joke . science lol

@RyanPente.

Ай бұрын

What's wrong with science

EARTH IS FLAT

Please find a true expert and not this professional guest.

Yeah, this guy lost credibility with me a few years ago.

@sandbridgekid4121

4 ай бұрын

Yes, because he's infinitely more educated than you.

@maloio6425

2 ай бұрын

Why? Religion?

@mikesawyer1336

Ай бұрын

I encourage you to go back and re-examine all of his work because of everyone who teaches science. This guy tries to teach people the principles of the scientific method. He doesn't jump to conclusions. He asks you to think about evidence and what it's telling you. Science may be confusing. May circle back on itself but this man has built a lot of credibility.

Everything started in the Mind of God and Everything came into existence by the Spoken Word of God..."Let there be and there was"...Only believe that's all😍

We all know the bible says the universe is 6000 years old. Check mate.

This genius doesn’t even understand gender.

Neil deGrasse Tyson the biggest grifter since the big bang.

Important to bear in mind our sciences are in their infancy. We cannot even imagine what's yet to be discovered.

This dude doesn't even know what a woman is.

This hacK doesnt even know the time of day… “That stuff is FLAT” - n dbag tyson

Yes. Let me watch 10 minutes of people senselessly trying to argue points they will never understand to completion in their lifetime. Hard pass.

Imagine an endless series of 'Big Bangs.' Going back & going forwards, Time having no meaning..Could this result in countless iterations of Einsteins & Elvis Presleys..?

Tyson said a whole lot of nothing at the beginning of this video... He just enjoys being on T.V, etc. He could just say the "big bang theory" is wrong and they don't really know what they're doing. My money is on the universe being eternal.