Check out over 100 aviation videos and tutorials - See the rest of the channel here: kzread.info/dron/OTbYtdmGZfqxq0D0lsrYeQ.htmlvideos

Short but informative. Amazing!

LPV is still considered a NPA though. If you want to know more, there’s a great boldmethod live video about PBN which is a commonly misunderstood concept in my opinion. Nice short!

@thecorporatepilotdad

3 ай бұрын

LPV is a non-precision approach but is actually classified as an APV approach which is an approach with vertical guidance in the United States. Some countries do consider it a precision approach.

Short and sweet!😁🛫 and to the point! Of touch down hopefully!

Shortest and sweetest Thanks

Great video!!!

So the LPV is the ILS based on GNSS?

@thecorporatepilotdad

2 жыл бұрын

Yes, same indications as the ILS for the most part, but LPV usually has slightly higher minimums.

Make a isolate video on it

LNAV/VNAV needs WAAS doesn’t it

@thecorporatepilotdad

8 ай бұрын

Not if Baro-VNAV equipped. Here is the source for that answer: LNAV/VNAV approaches provide both horizontal and approved vertical approach guidance. Vertical Navigation (VNAV) utilizes an internally generated glideslope based on WAAS or baro-VNAV systems. Minimums are published as a DA. If baro-VNAV is used instead of WAAS, the pilot may have approach restrictions as a result of temperature limitations and must check predictive RAIM (Receiver Autonomous Integrity Monitoring). See AIM 1-1-19, 5-1-16, and AC 90-105. www.faa.gov/sites/faa.gov/files/about/office_org/headquarters_offices/ato/RNAV_QFacts_final_06122012.pdf

@connorjensen2784

8 ай бұрын

@@thecorporatepilotdad wow thanks for responding so quick! I have my CFII check tomorrow so this was very much appreciated

@thecorporatepilotdad

8 ай бұрын

@@connorjensen2784 I just happened to be sitting at the computer when you left the comment. Best of luck on your CFII ride tomorrow. CFII is one of the easier checkrides (IMO).

Thanks for the video! What about RNAV? 🤔

@thecorporatepilotdad

6 ай бұрын

RNAV/GPS approaches are the approaches with LNAV, LNAV/VNAV, and LPV mins.

@Big_Sierra

6 ай бұрын

@@thecorporatepilotdad Thanks for clarifying that! Cheers

Erm, some LPVs take you down to 200 AGL

@thecorporatepilotdad

9 ай бұрын

Who said they didn’t? The LPV in the video has higher minimums.

@alexkochikyan

9 ай бұрын

@@thecorporatepilotdad Got it, you were talking about specifically these two approaches, I thought you were talking about what the typical mins are for each type of approach. My bad.

@thecorporatepilotdad

9 ай бұрын

@@alexkochikyan nope, just the approaches in the video. No worries.

my new lord and savior corporatepilotdad at it again helping me through training 🙏🙏

@thecorporatepilotdad

2 жыл бұрын

You may have said it before this comment, but are you currently doing real world flight training?

@Deanjacob7

2 жыл бұрын

@@thecorporatepilotdad just got my ppl about to start my instrument training

@thecorporatepilotdad

2 жыл бұрын

@@Deanjacob7 That is great. The instrument ticket is easier in my opinion. There are new regs to learn, different procedures, but for the most part, you're doing what you already know how to do. MSFS is a great tool in doing instrument training but be careful to NOT develop procedural bad habits in the sim that can be carried over to the airplane.

@Deanjacob7

2 жыл бұрын

@@thecorporatepilotdad I appreciate your help

which is more efficient an ils or lpv?

@thecorporatepilotdad

7 ай бұрын

LPV approaches can provide a reduced workload in the event of a missed approach by not having to change nav sources. GPS based approaches are not subject to interference from aircraft taxiing in front of antennas, and last of all, GPS based approaches are far cheaper to install than a ground based ILS system.

@yousuffarhatkhan6470

7 ай бұрын

thank you@@thecorporatepilotdad

ils cat 3 autoland nonstop

What's with the music?