Winner of the most acronyms of any video on KZread.

Concise and exrremely valuable! Thank you!!

Awesome 👏 Very informative! Thanks for the video

@flyaeroguard

3 жыл бұрын

You're very welcome. Glad you enjoyed it.

Flying is complicated (at times). Good thing we have good teachers.

@flyaeroguard

3 жыл бұрын

We agree, Beth is a great instructor! Glad you enjoyed the video

Explained well in short time

Amazing content

@flyaeroguard

3 жыл бұрын

Thank you!

Concise and informative. Really helpful Thank you 🙏🏽

@flyaeroguard

3 жыл бұрын

You're so welcome!

Finally, someone pointed out the significance of LPV not being considered Precision. I hadn’t previously heard and had not considered that as a result, you’d need the non-precision approach and respective alternate minima. Thank you for that.

@flyaeroguard

Жыл бұрын

Thank you, Jim!

Great video....very well explained...but please its WAAAAS not WOZ .......thanks !!!!

Great breakdown of the approaches. You guys do a great job! I would only edit the grammar mistake at 2 minutes.... Localizer.

Does the GPS give a message if there is a WAAS failure like it does with RAIM?

@flyaeroguard

Жыл бұрын

On the G430 if WAAS fails there will be a flashing, yellow box at the bottom left of the screen that says INTG (which stands for integrity). In a G1000, it will give a couple different indications; a CAS message that says GPS loss of integrity approach downgraded, in the CDI it says the accuracy of the GPS (so if you were at LPV it would become LNAV/VNAV or LNAV), and finally the vertical guidance bar will change shape and color. These are the two avionics systems in use at AeroGuard Flight Training Center so we responded in regards to our fleet. Please consult the avionics manual for the specific aircraft that you operate for the most accurate information. We hope this was helpful!

In your point of view, this third category of approaches - APV - is considered a PA or NPA?

@flyaeroguard

2 жыл бұрын

Hi Nikita According to AIM 5-4-5(a)(7), the APV type approach is defined as a third category. Most confusion occurs because the procedure for conducting an APV approach is quite similar to a precision approach. That is further exacerbated by the ACS that allows for APV approaches with specific minimum criteria to be used in lieu of a precision approach for specific tasks to be completed on an IR practical exam. The reality is that it’s in a separate category, but practically it seems closer to a precision approach than a non-precision approach. Hope that helps!

@NikitaKaminskyy

2 жыл бұрын

@@flyaeroguard That was the most complete and fastest answer I could ever expect, thank you so much!

When planning for lpv minimums at alternate airport, you DONT use standard non-precision minimums (800-2)…. You use lnav minima line…

@flyaeroguard

2 жыл бұрын

Hi there. According to AIM 1-1-18(c)(9)(a) it specifies “Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) part 91 non-precision approach weather requirements must be used for planning.” An example of this would be if a WAAS equipped aircraft is planning a flight that requires an alternate airport the pilot could select an airport with only a GPS approach but must comply with CFR 14 91.169(c)(1) and must assume only LNAV minimums are available. So even if the approach has an LPV minima line, for planning purposes, the pilot will assume only the non-precision lines are available. To further that example, the pilot should determine if there are non-standard alternate minimums for that approach first, if not, then the standards listed in CFR 14 91.169(c)(1)(i)(B) would be the weather minimums to use. Thanks!

Wow :)

is it illegal to fly using gps in ifr without WAAS ? just like you said?

@flyaeroguard

2 жыл бұрын

Hi there! This does get a bit complicated and specific; Non-WAAS equipped GPS units may be used for IFR operations, and are limited to how they are certified, what other navigation equipment is onboard the aircraft, and the phase of flight the GPS is being used. AIM paragraph 1-1-17 has detailed information that will allow a pilot to better understand the requirements for GPS certified under TSO-C129 or TSO-C196(). These certifications are the non-WAAS certified GPS that still have functionality in the IFR environment. As a general rule of thumb, the use of non-WAAS GPS units are more limited than those with WAAS, but with proper RAIM verification, system functionality, and an alternate means of navigation (i.e. VOR) nearly every phase of flight can be completed using a GPS. That is true for both GPS procedures or as an overlay (i.e. flying a Victor airway with GPS instead of VOR). Hope that helps!

@AllegeK

2 жыл бұрын

@@flyaeroguard thank you so much! It helped a lot! Then… does that mean you can fly ifr without vor receiver?

@flyaeroguard

2 жыл бұрын

@@AllegeK If you have WAAS, and you complete a RAIM prediction for your flight, and there are no NOTAMs for RAIM during your flight (for your particular routing) then yes you can fly IFR without a VOR.

@AllegeK

2 жыл бұрын

@@flyaeroguard Thank you so much again

By using 3 or 4 abbreviations per sentence, it impossible to follow....... imo

Sound is awful ... echo city. Really damages an otherwise informative presentation

@flyaeroguard

6 ай бұрын

Hello, thank you for your comment! We appreciate your feedback so we can improve our videos and make sure they are as helpful and informative as possible. Over time we've utilized better equipment that improved our sound and allowed us to produce higher quality videos and improve the viewer experience. Please reach out if you have any additional questions or concerns, and thank you for watching our videos!

It’s WAAS! Not WAZ🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️