I'm a really bad sleeper. Not only because I work fast changing shifts, but also because my thoughts tend to go crazy when I'm doing nothing. Just listening to this kind of video's help me so much. I'm truly interested in this subjects, and listen with great care. I learn a lot (not only about the subject that is being discussed, but also the english language) and at the same time I just can let go of stressful thoughts and just relax. Often I just fall asleep after just minutes causing me to watch/listen to the same video for a couple of times before I finish it, and it is just a win win Situation. This channel really is one of my go to channels for this. This long interviews or presentations are just the best thing to put on and not worry about. So thanks for this great content.

@Disastrous_Macaron

3 жыл бұрын

Try ASMR

I love listening to these presentations, I find learning from the men and women who present themselves and their professions, relaxing.

@purushottammishra3423

3 жыл бұрын

You just wrote is so smoothly man. And wrapped up my the feeling of watching those lectures in just a mere sentence. Fantastic!!

@mokujin29

3 жыл бұрын

@@purushottammishra3423 Spoken like a true Brahmann.

@robertlevine6658

3 жыл бұрын

Perseverance

@Jemawin

3 жыл бұрын

I like Frank Wilczek’s voice. Good bedtime listening.

@thevikingwarrior

Жыл бұрын

I would like to teach people things, but no one wants to listen to me do something like that. I have no authoritative position and am not taken very seriously as a result, even though I have extreme intelligence and can prove what I know is correct.

Wow. You absolutely need/deserve ta presentation at the Faraday desk! This has been my introduction to you and I am overjoyed and grateful. You're a matchmaker for Reality: when serious science meets and falls in love with beautiful explanations.

@TheRoyalInstitution

2 жыл бұрын

We have been very fortunate to have Frank speak at the Ri before - kzread.info/dash/bejne/pYSW2c2iYNTWgZc.html

I see Dr. Wilczek, I click. Always thought provoking. Thank you Dr.

@cosmikrelic4815

3 жыл бұрын

you forgot "i'm a simple man".

This was such a wonderful talk. I am so late to Nobel laureate Frank Wilczek's talks and ideas. Their youthful passion for exploring is infectious. 🌸

@hyperduality2838

3 жыл бұрын

Complementarity = two sides of the same coin = duality! The glass of water is half full -- optimist, the glass of water is half empty -- pessimist. Optimism is dual to pessimism. Certainty is dual to uncertainty -- the Heisenberg certainty/uncertainty principle. Space is dual to time -- Einstein. Gravitation is equivalent or dual to acceleration -- Einstein's happiest thought, the principle of equivalence (duality). Energy is dual to mass -- Einstein. Dark energy is dual to dark matter. Positive curvature is dual to negative curvature -- Gauss, Riemann Geometry. Curvature or gravitation is therefore dual, gravitational energy is dual. Potential energy is dual to kinetic energy. Apples fall to the ground because they are conserving duality. Action is dual to reaction -- Sir Isaac Newton. Syntropy (prediction) is dual to increasing entropy -- the 4th law of thermodynamics! Teleological physics (syntropy) is dual to non-teleological physics (entropy). "Always two there are" -- Yoda. Objective is dual to subjective. Complexity is dual to simplicity. Particles are dual to anti-particles, spin up is dual to spin down -- Dirac equation. Electro is dual to magnetic -- Maxwell's equations, electro-magnetic energy is dual, waves are dual to particles -- quantum duality. Energy is duality, duality is energy. Duality creates reality.

@theconnoisseur2346

3 жыл бұрын

As a physicist Frank is brilliant but as a philosopher he is 3rd class at best.

@GrimSleepy

2 жыл бұрын

@@hyperduality2838 Glass was half empty, it's now progressed further towards emptiness. Evaporation. ;)

You always know a man with that many pens in his top pocket knows what he is doing.

@___Chris___

3 жыл бұрын

In medicine: the less pens, the higher up the ladder. The head physician is the one who carries in his coat nothing but a single Montblanc and borrows the stethoscope from the lowest assistant.

@ottobhan725

3 жыл бұрын

Yes! You got the entire essence of world. He is a walking talking mind of great value to people of reason.

@ottobhan725

3 жыл бұрын

@@___Chris___ Ivory towers crumble under the weights of many oppressors. Today’s Medicine and ancient practices in spades! Have you noticed, in recent decades certified Drs of greying hair are interested in and prescribing to treat vitamin values? Hmm??

@___Chris___

3 жыл бұрын

@@ottobhan725 Wow, that was a weird comment. Doubt is a defining key element of science, just like replacing paradigms is when better ones show up. Crumbling ivory towers have nothing to do with it. Besides, vitamin effects aren't new knowledge. What I actually notice is many patients googling themselves into believing to have a vitamin deficiency that lab tests can't confirm (maybe with vit D as an exception in higher latitudes). Some doctors may exploit ignorance and placebo belief as a cash cow. Who is the 'oppressor' now?

@ottobhan725

3 жыл бұрын

@@___Chris___ Witty and wiggly retort noted. What’s your ascending sign? Militant much?

The music analogy is the best way I’ve heard wave particle duality described. Franks book “the lightness of being” is a wonderful description of reality from page 1 to the back cover. Loved it.

Small correction: at 2:14 the Earthrise picture was taken from a lunar orbit, not from the surface of the moon.

Really liked the Q And A at the end. Thanks to all involved.

So insightful 🌻💜 will surely try to get the book

The tea is ready! Extremely interesting, thank you!

Thanks for your deep understanding, and smart explanation which, took the tiredness out of my soul.

Outstanding! Best explanation of "objective" reality I've heard. A true Scientist able to hold ambiguity, unknowingness and complexity in their proper place...in awe of Nature!

@hyperduality2838

3 жыл бұрын

Complementarity = two sides of the same coin = duality! The glass of water is half full -- optimist, the glass of water is half empty -- pessimist. Optimism is dual to pessimism. Certainty is dual to uncertainty -- the Heisenberg certainty/uncertainty principle. Space is dual to time -- Einstein. Gravitation is equivalent or dual to acceleration -- Einstein's happiest thought, the principle of equivalence (duality). Energy is dual to mass -- Einstein. Dark energy is dual to dark matter. Positive curvature is dual to negative curvature -- Gauss, Riemann Geometry. Curvature or gravitation is therefore dual, gravitational energy is dual. Potential energy is dual to kinetic energy. Apples fall to the ground because they are conserving duality. Action is dual to reaction -- Sir Isaac Newton. Syntropy (prediction) is dual to increasing entropy -- the 4th law of thermodynamics! Teleological physics (syntropy) is dual to non-teleological physics (entropy). "Always two there are" -- Yoda. Objective is dual to subjective. Complexity is dual to simplicity. Particles are dual to anti-particles, spin up is dual to spin down -- Dirac equation. Electro is dual to magnetic -- Maxwell's equations, electro-magnetic energy is dual, waves are dual to particles -- quantum duality. Energy is duality, duality is energy. Duality creates reality.

@MendTheWorld

2 жыл бұрын

I think I must have seen a different video than you. The video I saw made no sense at all. Jealous of your multiverse. Wish I could pay visit.

I've watched a few of Franks podcast spots over the past fortnight, hosted by Sean Carroll, Brian Greene, Brian Keating, among others. All of them ask different questions so something new learned every time. Nice to hear him go through the book in his way now

@hyperduality2838

3 жыл бұрын

Complementarity = two sides of the same coin = duality! The glass of water is half full -- optimist, the glass of water is half empty -- pessimist. Optimism is dual to pessimism. Certainty is dual to uncertainty -- the Heisenberg certainty/uncertainty principle. Space is dual to time -- Einstein. Gravitation is equivalent or dual to acceleration -- Einstein's happiest thought, the principle of equivalence (duality). Energy is dual to mass -- Einstein. Dark energy is dual to dark matter. Positive curvature is dual to negative curvature -- Gauss, Riemann Geometry. Curvature or gravitation is therefore dual, gravitational energy is dual. Potential energy is dual to kinetic energy. Apples fall to the ground because they are conserving duality. Action is dual to reaction -- Sir Isaac Newton. Syntropy (prediction) is dual to increasing entropy -- the 4th law of thermodynamics! Teleological physics (syntropy) is dual to non-teleological physics (entropy). "Always two there are" -- Yoda. Objective is dual to subjective. Complexity is dual to simplicity. Particles are dual to anti-particles, spin up is dual to spin down -- Dirac equation. Electro is dual to magnetic -- Maxwell's equations, electro-magnetic energy is dual, waves are dual to particles -- quantum duality. Energy is duality, duality is energy. Duality creates reality.

@243david7

2 жыл бұрын

@@hyperduality2838 Thank you thats interesting

Thank you very much :-) Lovely that questions are welcome! Where are these live streams announced?

Looking forward to this.

@gerryb7859

3 жыл бұрын

lol

In Science we trust.... what a refreshing talk. Thank you!

@thatguywholikesdbnstuff9724

3 жыл бұрын

I can do science me 🥴

I would love to read that book.

I will picking up your book, really appreciate you sharing

Thankyou Blessings to you

These kinds of philosophical conversations are the ones I call the "sitting on the roof of your dorm at 2AM eating fries" conversations.

@hyperduality2838

3 жыл бұрын

Absolute truth is dual to relative truth -- Hume's fork. Concepts are dual to percepts -- the mind duality of Immanuel Kant. The intellectual mind/soul (concepts) is dual to the sensory mind/soul (percepts) -- the mind duality of Thomas Aquinas. Thesis is dual to anti-thesis creates converging thesis or synthesis -- the time independent Hegelian dialectic. Being is dual to non-being creates becoming -- Plato. Yin is dual to Yang. Antinomy (duality) is two truths that contradict each other -- Immanuel Kant. Complementarity = two sides of the same coin = duality! The glass of water is half full -- optimist, the glass of water is half empty -- pessimist. Optimism is dual to pessimism. Certainty is dual to uncertainty -- the Heisenberg certainty/uncertainty principle. Space is dual to time -- Einstein. Gravitation is equivalent or dual to acceleration -- Einstein's happiest thought, the principle of equivalence (duality). Energy is dual to mass -- Einstein. Dark energy is dual to dark matter. Positive curvature is dual to negative curvature -- Gauss, Riemann Geometry. Curvature or gravitation is therefore dual, gravitational energy is dual. Potential energy is dual to kinetic energy. Apples fall to the ground because they are conserving duality. Action is dual to reaction -- Sir Isaac Newton. Syntropy (prediction) is dual to increasing entropy -- the 4th law of thermodynamics! Teleological physics (syntropy) is dual to non-teleological physics (entropy). "Always two there are" -- Yoda. Objective is dual to subjective. Complexity is dual to simplicity. Particles are dual to anti-particles, spin up is dual to spin down -- Dirac equation. Electro is dual to magnetic -- Maxwell's equations, electro-magnetic energy is dual, waves are dual to particles -- quantum duality. Energy is duality, duality is energy. Duality creates reality.

@noahway13

3 жыл бұрын

Sounds like the munchies .

Are these streamed live on KZread? Is that where you accept questions?

Each planets, and stars , has a special voice, which is unique to the other star’s, likes humans, and animals, which each of us has the different voices , and this will be the beauty of the music’s.

Great interview! It would be really nice and complementary an interview with Irvin Lazlo about the relation betwen physics and councious.

What a brilliant mind you have, Sir.

@theconnoisseur2346

3 жыл бұрын

As a physicist Frank is brilliant but as a philosopher he is 3rd class at best.

I believe he is saying in the early universe, there were many more pocket protectors, but most were annihilated by anit-pocket protectors. Likely the same thing happened to most of the slide rules.

Thank you!

A genius guest, an extraordinary video. Thanks a lot The Ri. Really, what is the truth? What is the consciousness? What is the matter?

@hyperduality2838

3 жыл бұрын

Absolute truth is dual to relative truth -- Hume's fork. Antinomy (duality) is two truths that contradict each other -- Immanuel Kant. Complementarity = two sides of the same coin = duality! The glass of water is half full -- optimist, the glass of water is half empty -- pessimist. Optimism is dual to pessimism. Certainty is dual to uncertainty -- the Heisenberg certainty/uncertainty principle. Space is dual to time -- Einstein. Gravitation is equivalent or dual to acceleration -- Einstein's happiest thought, the principle of equivalence (duality). Energy is dual to mass -- Einstein. Dark energy is dual to dark matter. Positive curvature is dual to negative curvature -- Gauss, Riemann Geometry. Curvature or gravitation is therefore dual, gravitational energy is dual. Potential energy is dual to kinetic energy. Apples fall to the ground because they are conserving duality. Action is dual to reaction -- Sir Isaac Newton. Syntropy (prediction) is dual to increasing entropy -- the 4th law of thermodynamics! Teleological physics (syntropy) is dual to non-teleological physics (entropy). "Always two there are" -- Yoda. Objective is dual to subjective. Complexity is dual to simplicity. Particles are dual to anti-particles, spin up is dual to spin down -- Dirac equation. Electro is dual to magnetic -- Maxwell's equations, electro-magnetic energy is dual, waves are dual to particles -- quantum duality. Energy is duality, duality is energy. Duality creates reality.

@kagannasuhbeyoglu

3 жыл бұрын

@@hyperduality2838 A very profound and impressive statement. I will definitely think about it. Thanks👍

@hyperduality2838

3 жыл бұрын

@@kagannasuhbeyoglu All I ask is that you give it some thought. The following was meant for someone else (Symmetry & Noether's theorem) but you can have a read:- Symmetric wave functions (Bosons) are dual to anti-symmetric wave functions (Fermions). Waves or Bosons are dual to particles or Fermions -- quantum duality. Symmetry is dual to conservation -- the duality of Noether's theorem. Duality is the simplest symmetry:- Thesis is dual to anti-thesis creates converging thesis or synthesis -- the time independent Hegelian dialectic. Being is dual to non-being creates becoming -- Plato. The conservation of duality (energy) will be known as the 5th law of thermodynamics, energy is duality, duality is energy. Potential energy is dual to kinetic energy -- gravitational energy is dual. Electro is dual to magnetic -- Maxwell's equations, electro-magnetic energy is dual. The Proton (thesis) is dual to the Electron (anti-thesis) synthesizes the photon -- atoms. Photons are synthesized from the duality of the positive (Proton) and the negative (electron)! Fermions (Proton, Electron) are dual to Bosons (photon, force carriers). Noether's theorem is literally proof that there is a 5th law of thermodynamics!

@hyperduality2838

3 жыл бұрын

@@kagannasuhbeyoglu There are new laws of physics if you accept duality as real.

@Anonymous-gd7xd

3 жыл бұрын

@@hyperduality2838 wow I never think about reality in this way!

Please share the link to donate to this channel. Is there a patrion page?

@jonnamechange6854

3 жыл бұрын

I don't think that's how you should spell patreon.

Thank you.

On the topic of mind and matter, I think it is also important to acknowledge that our entire body of knowledge of evolution indicates that mind has evolved like everything else, and that abiogenesis of the first cells didn't involve any other trickery than what's covered by physics and chemistry.

Excellent.. thanks 🙏.

@theconnoisseur2346

3 жыл бұрын

As a physicist Frank is brilliant but as a philosopher he is 3rd class at best.

Thanks from Brazil!!!

I loved this

Interesting' respect from pakistsn

The timescale of when what group of organisms emerged on Earth is of course highly complex and in many cases will likely remain unknown as most life doesn't fossilize though we might be getting close to learning something about the origin of Eukaryogenesis. Also some interesting stuff regarding the late emergence of oxygenation relative to photosynthesis suggesting that based on the study of modern pelagic photoferrotrophs that competition for resources may very well have surprised aerobic photosynthesis which needs shallower depths to gain usable amounts of light its an interesting argument. GDP has serious problems namely the growth caused large scale wealth inequality and the lack of factoring in environmental costs and focus on short term benefits is thought to largely be the cause for many of our societies current issues thus its a bit of an iffy area. It is worth mentioning that there are currently several challenges for cosmology that have appeared of late related to the rate of expansion and they are probably related. First is while the cosmological principal works in the very early universe there is growing evidence ruling out the existence of any cosmological scale in the later universe. Ironically even the current model of cosmology lambda CDM doesn't need the cosmological principal as gravity quickly destroys it by the time of galaxies. I suspect this will tie into the distance ladder issues with the so called cosmological crisis related to the rate of cosmic expansion observed as if you have to actually compute the geometry of space at later timesteps due to the evolution of the universe you standard candles are not going to be so standard. Anisotropy is the rule not the exception in the low redshift universe even on the gigaparsec scale. After all if your premises are invalid the results are going to be off and the rate of expansion is built baked in with the cosmological principal which has already been shown to be invalid at gigaparsec scales in the low redshift universe. The bit about symmetry in nature has generally *not* worked out as in there have been zero testable predictions which have been produced results rather there has been a lack of results beyond the standard model. It is very premature to say it is how the universe works especially as we don't live in anti-de sitter space. At least at this point. Among dark matter candidates Axions along with sterile neutrinos do seem to be the best candidates with a much firmer foundation in observations than WIMP's ever had We have no reason to believe supersymmetry is real given the number of failed predictions the idea has had so far and the degree at which its parameters are tunable is problematic.

@cidfacetious3722

3 жыл бұрын

Somebody wants t their own Ted talk....

Oh good. After army I decided to stop evading university. Alas ... mid-1970s, Skinner's ratropomorphic approach was still dominant. Which only server to validate my cynicism! Thankfully, we now enjoy cognitive psychology, the scientific approach to the question of "How do we as persons, human individuals, make sense and give meaning to what we experience?" that said, well met / stay well! p.s. *!Losar! **_!Tashi delek and happy New Year of the Ox!_*

@zonderbaar

3 жыл бұрын

cognitive psychology is fine and for even more comprehensive understanding check out Carl Gustav Jung. It's like trying to figure out dark matter

@BenTrem42

3 жыл бұрын

@@zonderbaar Jung is over there, in the corner, along with Freud ... could not be more different than the science-based approach that's the foundation of the cognitive approach. (NB: Skinner pretended to science, but had no credible methodology.)

I like the rabbit and duck graph. I stopped the animation at 45 degrees as it rotated. There, I could, for brief moments, see both duck and rabbit simultaneously. Perhaps, at the 45 degree mark, both-and take precedence over either-or. My question is: why is it necessary to see the duck OR the rabbit?

@GrimSleepy

2 жыл бұрын

It's a visual analogy representing ideas and theories such as The Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle; "If you know a particle's position, you cannot know it's momentum. If you know it's momentum, you cannot know it's position."

Emits some volts of lights on some things in this realty by Dr Frank for many people.

I used to tape two pocket protectors back to back: one side with yellow; orange; pink; green; blue; and purple highlighters. The other side: aqua and fuscia highlighters; red, green, purple, blue, and pink ink pens. Each writing implement had a different meaning. Believe it or not. For like 15 years.

interesting lecture

Is Frank Wilczek's new book, "Fundamentals - Ten Keys to Reality" considered matter? If it is, then this is the proof the mind (intention of Wilczek's consciousness to write a book) can create matter and the information in it (vs. the perspective that human brain matter is mind/consciousness into itself, no other energies or senses involved). However, shouldn't the accumulation of scientific knowledge be considered to be matter, which structurally forms the creation of new matter forms from our intentions (like the slide on accelerating World GDP), since it has resulted in new physical forms (like the quantum computers and other technology forms) as well as the acceleration of human information overall and physical productivity by human beings? Perhaps the brain evolved the 'senses' to other energy forms, rather than the cells within the brain existing as being the place of mind/consciousness into themselves. Good insigtfull presentation and follow-up questions with the mind of a Noble Laureate!!

Time itself does not slow down, only the tools we use to measure it slow down.

@schmetterling4477

Жыл бұрын

Time is that which the clocks show, kid. We were trying to teach that to you when you were around five years old and were told how to read the clock. :-)

Depends on which observer is measuring "time". Thus: RELATIVivity.

The semantics of "time passes differently for each person" or "a person experiences time differently" seems to be VERY important. If we define time by an atomic clock (which we do), then if atoms act differently at different velocities and acceleration fields it doesn't change the definition of time. My tongue-in-cheek question is: "how far in the future does something have to go before I can't see it any more?"

Nice to know reality which is special

very thought provoking, but fundamentally it boils down to if you don't mind then it don't matter. (humor) :) If you dont mind it, it simply stays in the wave form... till you mind it and peek. :)

@EvaTruve

3 жыл бұрын

funny

@alangeisdorf4198

3 жыл бұрын

@@EvaTruve happy you saw the humor :)

It sounds like 'mind emerges from matter' is a reasonable perception to hold, but would it really be that big a jump to say that mind _is_ matter (and vice versa)-just at varying levels of complexity and/or entanglement?

@ThisNoName

3 жыл бұрын

Wave emerges from water, but wave is not water

@johnathanwalker7781

3 жыл бұрын

@@ThisNoName Yes, but what I said still works with what you're saying. Something that comes to my mind is integrated information theory. Awareness (which is different from consciousness-a rock cannot be aware) can be seen as an emergent phenomenon, but 'consciousness' would still have to be an intrinsic part of all things in order for awareness to actually emerge. A wave may emerge from water, but in order for a wave to form, water is required in the first place.

@ThisNoName

3 жыл бұрын

@@johnathanwalker7781 matter is required in the first place to have mass, do you insist mass is matter? Totally different, at least by human definition and description of the natural world. Of course, if you change definition, then anything is a yes.

@hyperduality2838

3 жыл бұрын

Mind (the internal soul, syntropy) is dual to matter (the external soul, entropy) -- Descartes. Complementarity = two sides of the same coin = duality! The glass of water is half full -- optimist, the glass of water is half empty -- pessimist. Optimism is dual to pessimism. Certainty is dual to uncertainty -- the Heisenberg certainty/uncertainty principle. Space is dual to time -- Einstein. Gravitation is equivalent or dual to acceleration -- Einstein's happiest thought, the principle of equivalence (duality). Energy is dual to mass -- Einstein. Dark energy is dual to dark matter. Positive curvature is dual to negative curvature -- Gauss, Riemann Geometry. Curvature or gravitation is therefore dual, gravitational energy is dual. Potential energy is dual to kinetic energy. Apples fall to the ground because they are conserving duality. Action is dual to reaction -- Sir Isaac Newton. Syntropy (prediction) is dual to increasing entropy -- the 4th law of thermodynamics! Teleological physics (syntropy) is dual to non-teleological physics (entropy). "Always two there are" -- Yoda. Objective is dual to subjective. Complexity is dual to simplicity. Particles are dual to anti-particles, spin up is dual to spin down -- Dirac equation. Electro is dual to magnetic -- Maxwell's equations, electro-magnetic energy is dual, waves are dual to particles -- quantum duality. Energy is duality, duality is energy. Duality creates reality.

oddly enough if you ask people to you that use the words "the universe" or just universe exactly what they mean by it, they never seem to have any idea at all because it is little more than a vague generalisation, which none can particularise or focus without reference to cognates and synonyms descriptions and circularity.they use the word and stop there seem to assume that simply because they have the word they also have the meaning or some understanding of it but when you ask them what it means to them they have no idea and that is because the word universe or the universe is a braub

@schmetterling4477

Жыл бұрын

You could just have said that the majority of people are idiots. ;-)

So many ways to plug a book

For the smaller objects like us , is so difficult to fully understand the bigger objects, until, we put ourselves into the position of the hugest objects!

I don’t recognise humility as correlation of the fact the universe is massive, not until we have evidence there’s consciousness somewhere out there (which there probably is, but until we are aware of it we can’t feel humble)

guy lives in a library

@hundun5604

3 жыл бұрын

All books self written.

@Meowjestic

3 жыл бұрын

@@hundun5604 well he has enough pens to write all those books, and many more.

youve a sublimely timely givft

The "dark" energy and "dark" matter are most likely the quantum fields that exist everywhere which allow a fluctuation to create a particle.

@Skankhunt420.

2 жыл бұрын

I left some dark matter in the toilet this morning. Took a lot of energy. I couldnt detect any fields

Love the harmony and melody analogy. No Plastic Bertrand, pleaase, Monsieur.

Thanks

nice chat for sure

What a refreshing talk. In science I trust... 🙏

@theconnoisseur2346

3 жыл бұрын

As a physicist Frank is brilliant but as a philosopher he is 3rd class at best.

You'd think that an eminent scientist could afford a decent internet connection, but no, apparently. Great presentation but I had to convert it to "radio" because watching the constant lag from his video feed was far too distracting.

In his talk he mentions the ability to see and understand, within limits that we are slowly expanding, what the "real world" is. The structure (us) that is doing this observation and rule-making is INSIDE the reality and subject to its potential and restraints. However, it is NOT that reality. We can imagine things that are not possible with the actual universe that we are currently living in (if a multiverse with alternatives, maybe this restriction is somewhat eased), so it is obvious that our minds are not constrained by actual physical laws that prevent matter and energy from doing things not allowed by the rules, individually or in combination ("all the rules, all the time"). Yet we DO have an edge to our ability to think about things, beyond which is the "inconceivable" infinite range of "otherness" (the "blind spots") take over. Where this wall stopping comprehension is would, if mapped, help us understand how consciousness and intelligence work. Right now we do not even have an agreement as to what "consciousness" and "self-awareness" really are, as defined by any external physical laws we know of. Yet these do have (mostly unknown) rules -- we can usually discern genius from insanity, if sometimes with difficulty, so they are not the same thing, for example -- and thus our minds live in a "space" (dimension set, in the most general definition of "dimension" as a necessary parameter that can and must be measured in some way and mixed in to allow solutions to questions) that is not a physical space, though built onto the usual physical materials (we think) such as atoms and so forth. Note, however, like in flight, you have to have at least rudimentary wings PRIOR TO being able to fly, so this "mind space" has to be part of our universe from the beginning to allow us to come into being. Figuring out ways to find out about it is going to be harder than finding out about Dark Matter, which at least has some major influences on the external world directly.

Frrak is my new hero.

Do I understand correctly: was the graviton first, the gravitational field first, out of which photons and its E/M field structures and particles emerged, at a later phase of an unfolding universe? Gravity emerges first, a distribution of gravitons follows, and quantum physical reality emerges from certain conditions in the world of gravity. If this is reasonable, this view would unite relativity to quantum physics. While the current reality slowly marches its way to gravitational drains, E/M structures gradually break down on its way to gravitational (black) holes and structures, and in this structure of gravity, E/M waves arise as quantum particles turn into reality. The cycle in which quantum physics is born from the field of gravity, and disappear over the horizon of black holes again, giving birth to gravitational waves. This is a closed loop or isn’t it?

@DigitalSurgeon69

2 жыл бұрын

not according to kip thorne

@francoisdewit7281

2 жыл бұрын

In vacuum the speed C is MAX for E.M.waves and MIN for GRAV. waves .Inside the horizon E.M.waves slow down GRAV.waves speed up since they are soundwave like(compression-expansion)in a more dense environment .So, inside the horizon fysics with C become less important .

Reality is realising your trousers don’t fit after snacking all through lockdown!

20:17. Actually you can do melody and harmony at once...if it's Mahler!

REALITY IS THE BILL IN YOUR MAIL BOX !!!

Frank's pocket situation looks like intentional eccentricity to me.

my intuition is that there is more to reality than revealed in this talk but turning intuition into something more concrete that's not so easy?

Complementarity = Continuum - innermost, midmost, outermost - 3 in 1 unity, creative creating creation.

You think ol' Francesco thought to add those 20 pens to his front pocket pre-recording, just to give us what we all came here for? Or does he usually use 3 different yellow highlighters every day? Does he pre-load that pocket protector, or perhaps has something similar to those little revolving tie racks, but just with pocket protectors - each with a different loadout for whatever type of day he is in store for?? For example, if he is going to give a lecture, he can quickly and easily select the pocket protector with 2 or 3 real nice ball-points, and a nice lead-holder? Instead of his 'gardening' pocket protector, with the 3 bic pens, and a couple of #2 yellow pencils? Come on people, what do you think is really going on?? Ugh, I need a drink.

Gravitational radiation ? If gravity is a result of the warping of spacetime by any mass and there fore a temporal issue , would a "graviton" be a "chroniton" ??

What about the External Field Effect for dark matter?

@timthomas3281

3 жыл бұрын

Fake

What I really want to know in watching a video on "What is Reality" is not how quarks behave, etc, but why quarks should exist at all, and what inherent principle dictates that the laws of physics are what they are as opposed to other imaginable laws of physics. To have a burning desire to understand this is an adventure in sheer frustration since I fear that no human has ever really had much of a clue save for overconfident hallucination. The universe appear to exist for the reason of sheer perversity.

@lepidoptera9337

2 жыл бұрын

Relativity dictates most of it.

@multi-mason

Жыл бұрын

Relativity doesn’t “dictate,” ffs. It’s an abstract model. Descriptions of things don’t dictate the things they describe, by any stretch of the imagination.

@tom-kz9pb

Жыл бұрын

@@multi-mason I am not referring to relativity dictating reasons for existence of the universe, but asking if anything at all dictates why there must be "something" rather than nothing in the universe. I realize that it is a somewhat rhetorical question,since no one really knows for sure, but the question at least invites speculation. Concerning relativity, sometimes I have seen literature that implies that relativity "dictates" that the speed of light is constant, but I think that would be misleading. The theory of special relativity did not *deduce* that the speed of light was constant. That had been an previous, experimental observation, which was an up-front assumption for special relativity, and really the constituting a key basis for everything that followed. The roots of relativity really go back to the 1800s. If any physical law "required" existence of waves and particles, or details such as the specific value of the speed of light, it would be incomprehensible to the human mind to be unable to why such a law should exist. Yet when thinking about a "first" cause, the cause of causes, it seems like it cannot be a meaningful question. To ask "why" is asking about causality. Our notion of causality involves time, because the cause of anything must precede the thing in time. To ask why time exists therefore implies the existence of time in the very act of asking the question. Yet the question does not answer itself in any satisfying way. As speculation, I think if you asked some all-knowing, super-advanced aliens why the universe has to be like this, they would laugh and say, "Oh, it *doesn't* have to be like this. It *isn't* like this. It is like *Everything*."

@tom-kz9pb

Жыл бұрын

Typo: "incomprehensible to the human mind to be unable to *ask* why"

That question about is time "itself" DIFFERENT from using clocks to measure it, seems to want to come up with some different kind of test like the one demonstrating the Cassimere Effect that shows that "virtual" particles actually have a short-time physical existence, since making the gap between test plates small can exclude the large virtual particles, which could not be true if they were just theoretical ghosts. How such a "sideways" test for time would work is not obvious, though...

@schmetterling4477

2 жыл бұрын

There are no virtual particles. There are not even real particles. ;-)

@NathanOkun

2 жыл бұрын

@@schmetterling4477 Maybe there are "virtuous reality" particles as in an alternate universe parody by, I think, Harry Turtledove, about as universe based on "religious physics" where God and Science were BOTH in existence and things like calling Los Angeles "the City of Angels" was LITERALLY TRUE -- flying carpet link was their smog. Fun book!

Doesn't the fact of time dilation and length contraction just feel like space has some sort of density?

hawking points is some good evidence for penroses theory

if and when we do fully understand quantum will we master our universe ? i love space eire

@theconnoisseur2346

3 жыл бұрын

As a physicist Frank is brilliant but as a philosopher he is 3rd class at best.

Matter and antimatter = electrons and positrons, do not annihilate each other they equalize into Aether. e->~

It doesn't matter what's inside a black hole. It could be crushed photons with a few antiparticles. I could understand if an original formation of black holes was a bit unbalanced in matter antimatter, by say, one part in a billion.

Since we live and build reality in our heads, the perceived size of the universe is immaterial. It’s as big as the designer of the simulation wants us to believe it is.

@raidermaxx2324

2 жыл бұрын

no need for religion and unknown knowables.. the whole point is we are getting closer and closer to the fundamental truth, and it has nothing to do with "simulations" or "gods"

Is the GDP chart not accounted for by inflation? The initial ramp up coincides roughly with the Napoleonic War and then the sharp rise coincides with the World War 2

"Insert smart quote"

Oh! Dudes. They need to add a spinning circular trivet on the existing spinning circular trays in a microwave and pair this with a magnetron that cuts off intermittently during a cooking cycle. This will give a looping corkscrew like trajectory of cooking food instead of a simple spinning in place orientation to the microwaves. It's just an additional gear and a solenoid switch. No ore be evenly cooked food at lower energies and reduced times.

@travisfitzwater8093

2 жыл бұрын

More evenly cooked.

I'm sorry, I don't understand how this has so many upvotes. The cohesion of the presentation is so strained by the style that speeding it up to 1.25x was not enough to get past the presenters stuttering and pauses in which he himself seems to get lost. I just couldn't get past the frustration of the first 20 minutes.

So many pens in pocket....

@3dlabs99

3 жыл бұрын

If he makes a great new discovery he wants to be VERY SURE he can write it down.

@deeliciousplum

3 жыл бұрын

The true sign of having climbed to the topmost rung of the covetted passionate about everything nerd ladder. 🖊🤓

@alangeisdorf4198

3 жыл бұрын

its how constipated mathematicians work it out, with a pencil (more humor)

@ac.creations

3 жыл бұрын

I have a pencil a crayon and sharpie in my pocket. So i can write on any surface at any time.

@TheThunderSpirit

3 жыл бұрын

so many book placed right behind his seat, how does he even leave his chair.

Antiprotons can be produced by partical accelerators like Cern's LHC. This done by smashing protons in to a metal target, at close to the speed of light producing, high temperature, and pressure. Sun has high temperature protons , neucli of metals, and pressure. If antineutrons / neutron pairs are produced they would decay into a antiproton, protons, positron, electrons, antineutrino, and neutrinos. Antiprotons would be attracted to protons, and anililate immediately returning back to energy, and the same would happen to positron, and electrons. Neutrinos being neutral, that would not anililate this explains why neutrinos are more abundant. The Sun would emit photons / antiphons, and protons in the solar wind being a matter producing machine. The Sun beig a positive charge the body holding, negative charged antiproton storing the antimatter in the form of energy ?

🐚💎

18:15 -- Complementarity Insight ^.^

@TheMemesofDestruction

2 жыл бұрын

47:00 Meta Data ^.^

What is reality ? Never as good as you imagined. Stay in your dream world X.

@hyperduality2838

3 жыл бұрын

Complementarity = two sides of the same coin = duality! The glass of water is half full -- optimist, the glass of water is half empty -- pessimist. Optimism is dual to pessimism. Certainty is dual to uncertainty -- the Heisenberg certainty/uncertainty principle. Space is dual to time -- Einstein. Gravitation is equivalent or dual to acceleration -- Einstein's happiest thought, the principle of equivalence (duality). Energy is dual to mass -- Einstein. Dark energy is dual to dark matter. Positive curvature is dual to negative curvature -- Gauss, Riemann Geometry. Curvature or gravitation is therefore dual, gravitational energy is dual. Potential energy is dual to kinetic energy. Apples fall to the ground because they are conserving duality. Action is dual to reaction -- Sir Isaac Newton. Syntropy (prediction) is dual to increasing entropy -- the 4th law of thermodynamics! Teleological physics (syntropy) is dual to non-teleological physics (entropy). "Always two there are" -- Yoda. Objective is dual to subjective. Complexity is dual to simplicity. Particles are dual to anti-particles, spin up is dual to spin down -- Dirac equation. Electro is dual to magnetic -- Maxwell's equations, electro-magnetic energy is dual, waves are dual to particles -- quantum duality. Energy is duality, duality is energy. Duality creates reality.

All those pens are actually antenna 😅

Mother Nature equiped us with senses. Sight. Hearing Touch Smell and whatever comes into contact with these sences is what we perceive to be reality There may be other realities but they will be beyond what nature equiped us to percieve

.. so there's little possibility for the universe to be harboring matter in one corner and antimatter in the opposite corner

14:25 For anyone overwhelmed by the question of “What is Reality?”, the diagram at 14:25 will make everything perfectly clear. I can say that I didn’t truly understand reality until seeing this diagram.

@nickacelvn

2 жыл бұрын

OMG, You're right! The moment I saw this masterpiece it was like a transformation. Instantly once I saw it I knew exactly why I am here! Life will forever be simple after today. I feel so lite, as tho a huge weight has been lifted 14:25 is truly a transformation not only in understanding life, the universe, and everything in it but as far as diagrams go this is pure mastery. Seriously tho MendTheWorld you just gave me the best laugh I've had in a long long time. You are truly a master of brilliant comments. xoxo

While still open minded as this lecture begins to stream, I'm disappointed to observe the difference between the speaker's own title "What Reality Has Taught Me" and a clickbait title "What is Reality?" used to post this lecture within KZread.

Well id agree in the Einstein quote, if we had a clue what dark matter and energy is. we dont even have a grasp of it.

@schmetterling4477

Жыл бұрын

You are projecting. ;-)

So, with "Complementarity" you CAN have incompatible things happening at once, as long as you only study one part and exclude the other, switching back and forth as necessary. This kind of "kicks sand" on Einstein, though, who thought that such things must means we are missing something fundamental somewhere to think that this is an acceptable way to do science. If he is wrong, then our universe is a much more complex and "blurry" place.

Reality is the pedanticized subset of actuality. Royality is actuality for plebs, so they don't royalize that existence is interactive.

Hey Frank, physics guy, time to get a new webcam methinks ;) (or better net connection)

God??And christmas gift??? Huh 6:23!! How did You get that Overview?? I wonder

Does this guy seriously think there's an invisible magic skydaddy?!? He sure does deal with the first crackpot quite gently, though.