Looking forward to going through this. Thank you for this submission to #PaCE1.

I feel a lot dumber... with all jokes aside, I appreciate what you are sharing here. The stuff is fascinating to me.

I am convinced that the underlying understanding and current exploration regarding the theoretics of E8 is the system closest to unraveling the theory of everything. It's incredibly exciting times 🤘

Been waiting for some progress on this and Garrett Lisi's TED talk from years ago

Thank you David, great work.

Excellent mustache! It's important to recognize the significance of an excellent mustache.

@QuantumGravityResearch

Жыл бұрын

100%.

@therealdrbyte

3 күн бұрын

Lie Tash group

Thank you for this awesome presentation

@QuantumGravityResearch

Жыл бұрын

Glad you enjoyed it!

@davidt1621

8 ай бұрын

@@QuantumGravityResearch I wonder if there's some, as yet unknown, way to control the process of sonoluminescence to reverse the effect of gravitons. Do you know if there's any research into this possibility? I know that Malcolm Bendall has been working on using sonoluminescence to generate a LENR. It seems like there might could be more possibilities for research of its quantum gravitational effects on water molecules.

Wishing you all a great Christmas !! And much success for the new year !!

@QuantumGravityResearch

Жыл бұрын

Same to you!

Thank you ❤ that is great work!

@QuantumGravityResearch

Жыл бұрын

Our pleasure! Thank you for watching!

if energy=information, e8 looks for me like data structure of this information

Me: "What new geometry is this..?" Gandolf: "An analog- an algebra of the ancient world... These maths are beyond any of you... RUN!"

Excellent!

I feel humbled and inspired. I got lost at 24 min. mark.

@PaulJohnLeonard

Жыл бұрын

A lot further than me !

@frinoffrobis

Жыл бұрын

3:32.. I already failed matrices once, no need to experience that pain again

Great video.

@QuantumGravityResearch

Жыл бұрын

Thanks for the visit!

Very interesting

Time and space are functions of ones conceptual scheme

How does this describe the transition boundary initiating the emergence of gravity at scale?

holy mustache batman.... do you have some sinister motives here?

@aharonwsmith

Жыл бұрын

😆

@The.Collective.Objective.

Жыл бұрын

😆 ded

Read much? Wow! Did not know that I would be listening to an audio book...you are so smart, you can read other people's work.

Dalí 🖌🎨

Oh I get it

You shown like a politician.

I would not use Emergency here actually. That is associated with System Science usually.

Without love in the dream insanity's King.

Well, yeah, obviously.

I know it gets me out of a false matrix into alignment if that helps anyone 🎉

Something is wrong with the audio!!!

@QuantumGravityResearch

Жыл бұрын

Sorry, I'll try to get access to a better microphone next time!

@layton3503

Жыл бұрын

no, it's you

@jari2018

Жыл бұрын

to much sshh , nothing a thick sock could fix

Very interesting but real numbers don't exist. You'll have to start from zero, using rational numbers or dihedron numbers (the true complex numbers). Instead of octonions use 2x2x2x2 matrices of dihedron numbers.

@ondrejstefik159

Жыл бұрын

why ? can use Geometric Numbers of corresponding Geometric Algebra. Real Clifford.

@henrikljungstrand2036

6 ай бұрын

That said, Dihedrons (rational Split-Quaternions, not rational Split-Complex numbers) are interesting, and so are the other standard split composition algebras over rational numbers. However there are VERY MANY (probably uncountable, if we allow those of infinite dimensions, such as various direct limits) field extensions and composition algebras over the rational numbers. Not only can you do quadratic extensions with a new number that square to *any* square free integer (number 1 being a special case, and number 0 which is a square being another special case), and get a different non-isomorphic version of quadratic "complex" numbers, but you can also do cubic extensions, quartic extensions, quintic extensions etc ad infinitum and get higher dimensional versions of "complex" numbers, and split/non-division versions thereof. These are usually "hidden" within the Archimedean metric structure of real complex numbers, but they are VERY overt when working over the rational numbers as base field, and they are also overt yet unique when working over the prime finite fields. Besides all these field extensions and other commutative associative ring extensions, there are lots of non-commutative associative ring extensions, and lots of alternative non-associative ring extensions of the rational numbers. Some of them are quadratic normed composition algebras, but even in those cases, there are infinite (countable) possibilities. Others are most likely "cubic normed composition algebras" or more complicated things, that cannot easily be defined over real numbers. For rational quaternion algebras, choose two square free rational numbers q1 and q2. Set i^2 = q1, j^2 = q2, i*j = -j*i. Then (assuming associativity) (i*j)^2 = i*j*i*j = -i*i*j*j = -i^2*j^2 = -q1*q2, i*(i*j) = q1*j and (i*j)*j = q2*i, so this is a four dimensional algebra, that with some work can be shown to be a quadratic normed composition algebra, i.e. supporting a quadratic norm form Q such that Q(x) is a rational number, and that Q(s*x) = s^2*Q(x) for all rational scalars s, and that there is a B such that Q(x+y) = Q(x) + Q(y) + B(x,y), where B is a symmetric bilinear form (orthogonal form). This quadratic norm form Q is usually constructed through a conjugate operation, which comes from the Galois groups (two element groups) of the quadratic field extensions for i and for j. Namely given a Galois symmetry '_i that swaps i and -i, and a Galois symmetry '_j that swaps j and -j, we combine them into a conjugation that both swaps i and i', and swaps j and j', and also will swap i*j and -i*j, because we decide that it should be an anti-automorphism. It should also be linear. Then Q(x) is merely x*x' This may be done through Pfizter forms also. The reason i mention Galois symmetries at all is because these become important for cubic norm forms and more complicated things, where you best define the form as a product of factors related through Galois symmetries.

Wow! That's amazing! I just shaved a matting off my cat's rear-end that looked exactly like the matting on your head! The cat feels much better now with it shaved off...he is much "cleaner" and "presentable" now....prior to shaving it off, my cat was dirty and smelly.

All the mathematics in the world is futile if you can't come up with something to perform an experiment on. We want Star Trek physicists who can develop warp drive technology based on real experiments. Unless you can perform an experiment on E8 in the lab, then what good is it?

@Chester31124

Жыл бұрын

It could help to find a theory that gives finite results for quantum gravity. Even though most string theorists struggle to connect to reality, Joel Scherk wrote about how supergravity can lead to antigravitic effects. String theorists have been studying the idea of traversible wormholes more recently. Warp drive is challenging; I suspect understanding a single coherent theory that combines gravity and electromagnetism could help with those pursuits. This video was not about experimental validation of a single theory that involves e8, but rather focused on the mathematical foundations of e8 and attempted to give an overview of various different approaches for using e8 for theoretical physics. Of course, diving further into a single theory and discussing experimental implications would also be interesting. Cheers.

@ondrejstefik159

Жыл бұрын

one cannot start doing experiments unless the theory is solid already. think, how many decades it took for many physics theories to be verified by experiment...? so patience. help or observe or pray silence.

A very fine moustache you got there good sir!