I'm a physicist but also a medium, and I channel the ETs/UAPs all the time. They are actually from the higher planes (aka the higher densities), which are areas of existence that are successively more Gödel complete. Their reality structure thus contains mathematical concepts that don't exist here, and this gives rise to additional physics, which are supernatural from our perspective. This is why they are all of the ancient gods, as they carry capabilities and technology we cannot possess or even fully understand here. There are 7 main planes and we are in the 3rd. They say the higher planes can also be understood as higher projections through a larger, more Gödel complete version of E8. They also say our consciousness is infinite and outside of the multiversal crystal, because the multiverse is a construct within that larger mind. We are projecting an aspect of our total consciousness into this crystal, down into some reality inside of it, and then into the human body (or any object). We are not these bodies. We don't actually exist down here; we exist all the way up there on the highest plane. We just projected ourselves down here into this plane, which has specific properties and limitations in order to have the experiences here that we do -- the experience of being not omnipotent and to have infinite adventures. They say the Earth is a school planet for souls, which is why it is designed to be so harsh. Existence is actually entirely happy and blissful normally, and hell does not exist as the entire multiversal crystal is, in a way, our infinite arcade to have any adventure in any kind of world. This is what an incarnation is, a projection of an aspect of the total mind into the multiversal crystal construct within that mind, placing limitations upon itself, hiding parts of itself from itself in order to play infinite games with itself. What we do on Earth primarily is to figure out what we want out of the infinite choices we have. To figure out who we are, and to gain experiences from the hardships here. This is why we can leave our bodies, and why we are knocked out of the body when the body dies or is influenced with certain substances. When we project ourselves down here into this plane, you can picture this as a higher dimensional light cone, but down here we see a 3D cross section of this cone, which is a sphere of light. This is what a soul actually is. It's why souls and many UAP objects are round, massless lights. They say we cannot create a true theory of everything because to understand this plane in its entirety, you need to be in the next higher plane and use the additional mathematical concepts that don't exist here. So there will always be situations where we can't mathematically describe or understand what happens. They say string theory is peering into the higher planes a little but won't get further eventually, and they say particles are actually universes on smaller Planck scales because the multiverse is a fractal crystal and so it's a Planck scale WITHIN a Planck scale, infinitely. Each particle is a time crystal, and our universe is also an oscillating time crystal which is embedded as a particle in the next higher Planck scale. The minimum diameter of the universe is 1 Planck unit in the next higher scale, which is approx 0.98 light years. Also, this universe is a cross section of a universe tube, where each cross section expands or contracts, and that is what strings really are. Expanding cross sections gain information, shrinking cross sections lose information and push it along this "universe tube" or string into the expanding sections. This is why string theory is not wrong also, it just looks something else and gets so complicated because they are missing the higher plane math, which would shrink the theory down into a few simpler equations so to speak. Our plane is way easier to describe up there due to the additional concepts.

@gnosis33-real

4 ай бұрын

What branch of physics do you work in?

@emotionalrobot1602

4 ай бұрын

@realmetatron >> Quality output I have to say... excellent 👌💯🙏😎🌠

@realmetatron

4 ай бұрын

@@emotionalrobot1602 Thank you

@felipeabreu7998

2 ай бұрын

Thanks for sharing!

@metallicarocks300000

20 күн бұрын

cap 🧢

Outstanding work David! My jaw dropped around slide 65 when you combined MM & YM! Really cool!

@QuantumGravityResearch

5 ай бұрын

Thanks! To be honest, it was surprising that there wasn't much work in the literature exhaustively working through the similarities and differences of Yang-Mills gauge gravity vs MacDowell-Mansouri gauge gravity.

@MujtabaFaraz-fc6cj

5 ай бұрын

I can fix your jaw i am surgeon

Within the first minute of this video, there was a bunch of technical jargon used that most people (lay persons interested in science) are unfamiliar with. As a teacher or educator, it is important to not only give the big picture before getting down to the details, but to define certain terms so that the audience can follow along. Otherwise… This is a video for a very limited audience.

@driventoaccount3276

5 ай бұрын

Any tips appreciated

@driventoaccount3276

5 ай бұрын

Cuz I’m trying

@henrikljungstrand2036

5 ай бұрын

Actually i appreciate the tecnical jargon, which is what makes the theory mathematically rigorous (a must!), and scientifically viable for testing in the first place. It is important not to dumb down things too much. Although coming from a teacher background, i am well aware of the importance of being pedagogic and clear, going from the general to the specific, not only defining certain terms but also communicating certain images about how we may think about them.

@Yyachub

5 ай бұрын

'made rigorous' in the title, so i think it's fair to say it will be technical!

@henrikljungstrand2036

5 ай бұрын

@@Yyachub Exactly!!! 😁🔢💠

I love these videos.

@QuantumGravityResearch

5 ай бұрын

Thanks for sharing! More to come in 2024.

Merry Christmas 🤶 🎄 quantum gravity researchers!!

@QuantumGravityResearch

5 ай бұрын

And a Happy New Year to you too!

E8万物生(in chinese) E8-latticeTheory Make everything! Reality is geometric, it's the very begin of Universe

@QuantumGravityResearch

5 ай бұрын

Thanks for sharing!

Thank you. I can imagine how difficult it must be to convey this without entertaining conjecture too much. I am a mining engineer and one of my fondest contemplations is of how more weird metals can be/are used in doing this kind of thing and not just used in game boxes. Praise to you for so rigorously pursuing something so difficult to sell. I hope that these can eventually lead to faster travel or harnessing alternative forms of energy that people may suffer less and have time to so explore each of their relative spirits. I can only imagine the draw of unending thought fragments to assimilate in this mathematical space that by design relates to everything. Beautiful work.

Thanks!

@QuantumGravityResearch

5 ай бұрын

Thanks, everyone at Quantum Gravity Research appreciates your support!

Wow, I feel incredibly fortunate that my journey through life has excluded any understanding of anything related to this presentation.

David Chester a legend

Glad to hear Furey work on octonians was included. I miss her vids. Can't wait what Skip Garibaldi says about this, he had some beef with Lisi 12-15 years ago

@QuantumGravityResearch

5 ай бұрын

Thanks, we're thinking of doing more down-to-earth explainer videos, possibly some on Cohl Furey's work to come in 2024! It will also be curious to see how the physics community responds to this work.

I want to be a part of this team. It's so heady that most people can't grasp it but the potential is there...I donate but I'd like to help more.

Excellent presentation. How does an Engineer apply Group Theory to design a physical apparatus?

@QuantumGravityResearch

5 ай бұрын

Thanks Todd. In principle, it's conceivable that group theory can help engineers one day, possibly with applications to chemistry and biology. For instance, Michel Planat and coauthors at QGR have discussed applications of group theory to DNA, but this still isn't at the level of engineering. For physicists, the group theory of the standard model is understood, but it's hard to make real-world engineering applications from, say, the strong force. This isn't group theory's fault. Once humanity progresses with a deeper understanding of how chemistry works in the framework of unified field theory, I think it can open up new applications for engineering one day via material science. Condensed matter theorists must have a good understanding of group theory at times and they can get jobs at Intel and work with engineers. I do agree that it is challenging for, say, a single engineer to find immediate applications of group theory. For electrodynamics, the gauge group is simply U(1), so there isn't much sophisticated group theory there. Thanks for the question, it's a worthwhile perspective to keep in mind.

Have you used AI ( i.e. ChatGPT 4 turbo ) to help you further this research?

@QuantumGravityResearch

5 ай бұрын

We have been testing ChatGPT4 out for various science questions and tasks. For this project, it helped a bit for clarifying detailed aspects of how the generators of SU(5) x U(1) work. In this case, ChatGPT didn't give the right answer, but seeing its flow of logic was helpful for speeding up progress for this one part of the project.

That mustache can solve almost any problem. Way to hustle.

Theory of Everything? Did a candidate particle or an explanation for Dark Matter drop out of the equations?

@QuantumGravityResearch

5 ай бұрын

Totally valid point. While we wouldn't typically refer to this as a TOE, some have, so it is at least a popular buzzword. We thought it was not an appropriate title for a scientific conference, yet okay for KZread. However, there are two remarks on dark matter: 1) The backup slides in this talk discussed other published work that found a candidate for dark matter, which was essentially inspired by Eric Weinstein and seeking the origin of M-theory in relation to the Leech lattice and the Monster group. A dark matter researcher who used to work for QGR claimed that her simulations suggested roughly 2000 degrees of freedom for warm dark matter. I believe this was looking at galaxy formation. There are new algebras that generalize E8, the level above E8 contains a 2048 spinor. It turned out that the super-algebra that generalizes this E8(-24) to the higher level predicted a dark matter spectrum. 2) Another one of our contacts believes that the 2048 spinor approach is wrong. They prefer describing all of dark matter with axions. This talk overlooked a more general gravitational sector. For instance, we know that torsion is required and that torsion relates to the so-called Kalb-Ramond axion. In other words, it is plausible that future work on E8 might be able to identify axions, which may have applications to dark matter. However, further research is required. Thanks for asking!

All this math is busy work for braniacs, but it doesn't actually explain in any simple way how QM and GR are related. It doesn't break any new ground in technology.

@henrikljungstrand2036

5 ай бұрын

They are most likely getting there. Since they are using a non-compact form of E8 for describing QM. And GR is inherently a non-compact theory.

@eachday9538

5 ай бұрын

If successful this would be the most exactly simple way to explain relationships. It's no different to drawing a straight line to link two places. This would be the most efficient geometric path "straightest line" between elements... from what I gather.

@wulphstein

5 ай бұрын

@@henrikljungstrand2036 But what does E8 have to do with something that you can measure or control in a laboratory? Or build a machine out of? This is all just a way to gratify the egos of students without ever achieving anything real.

@QuantumGravityResearch

5 ай бұрын

To combine quantum mechanics and general relativity might require quantum field theory (QFT). QFT is somewhat complicated. While this presentation was highly technical, in comparison to other studies of conformal gauge gravity, we believe that the results found are relatively simple. Also, we believe that this theory overall is much simpler than heterotic string theory, which is one of the most popular approaches to unification of QM and GR. Further research is needed to verify if such an approach with E8 has desirable properties for quantum gravity, but the inclusion of supersymmetry is a clue that the solutions might have some nice properties. Regarding technology, you are right. It takes time for science to affect engineering. When Einstein wrote down general relativity in 1915, there weren't any solutions to the theory. Some thought it would take a long time to find solutions, which is a necessary step before engineering. However, solutions such as the Schwarzschild black hole metric or gravitational waves were found in due time. It took time, but eventually, this science led to technological advances such as GPS. It becomes more challenging to think of how to build technology from applied elementary particle physics. However, there is scientific work suggesting that aspects of quantum gravity may slightly affect quantum chemistry. Therefore, if we can understand solutions of unified field theory, it will help us prepare for material science and engineering that requires the combination of quantum matter and gravity. For instance, NASA is struggling to understand how to combine the Casimir force with general relativity for propulsion applications. If we had a deeper understanding of quantum gravity, it may help for new propulsion technology. Also, there is a deep connection being uncovered between quantum mechanics and general relativity through the lens of entanglement. We also are interested in exploring the relationship between quantum information and spacetime. Our hypothesis is that the universe processes information efficiently, as it is the most macroscopic notion of nature. Just as we can be inspired to create better armor by studying the exoskeletons of certain fish, we believe that understanding how quantum gravity works may help unlock new approaches to topological quantum computation. Currently, quantum computers are not practical because of the errors, so developing computers with error-correcting codes would be a huge technological advance for humanity.

@wulphstein

5 ай бұрын

@@QuantumGravityResearch When I look at the two slit interference experiment, I see spheres (wave functions) expanding from a Planck scale point. They expand at the speed of light. The idea that ontologically real wave functions expand like spheres comes from (1) the big bang expansion from a point and (2) the concept of light cones. Then I guessed that these ontologically real expanding spheres were expressing the physics constants. If they expand at the speed of light, then they express the speed of light. So they should also express all the other physics constants (Planck constant, permittivity, permeability, etc). By expressing physics constants, they become ontologically real things. The surface area of an expanding sphere is a virtual photon wave. What causes it to expand is dark energy. Dark energy causes the universe (spacetime) to expand. The hunch is that spacetime is made of a continual supply of expanding spheres, each of which contains a small fraction of dark energy. Just like standing in the ocean at the beach and being knocked over by a wave, these expanding spheres express dark energy as a gravitational acceleration that buffets particles. We know of this as the Casimir effect. These expanding spheres overall produce a positive pressure that comes from the Planck scale. In this sense, it is a 4D spacetime positive pressure. Particles, matter, planets, moons, stars, nebula, black holes, etc, obstruct the positive pressure; they block the positive pressure which is what we experience as gravity. When particles obstruct these expanding spheres, they absorb the expanding spheres and make turn them into particle-wave duality. (Hydrogen) atom wave functions are the result of particles absorbing expanding spheres, trapping them for a time until they eventually escape again (perhaps taking with them some dark energy - I don't know for sure). But the key to controlling a technology that involves expanding spheres, dark energy, gravity, etc is to use entangled photons. It should be possible to centrifuge photons along an optical fiber using a 1000 meter radius disk that spins thousands of RPMs. This would require engineering that is way over my head. The idea is to induce a redshift in one entangled photon and a blueshift in the entangled photons partner. The idea is to store gravitational potential energy as Delta U = Planck constant*(f2 - f1) or Delta U = h*Delta f.

I see all the dazzling mathematics that should make any physicist proud to have mastery of. But physics isn't about gloating over one's mastery of mathematics. Physics is supposed to break new ground in what we can do technologically and what we can make sense of. Is all this math really necessary to seeing how the universe is put together? Set up?

@henrikljungstrand2036

5 ай бұрын

The Universe is way more complex, yet at the same time simple, than this elegant theory can ever portray, far less so a less elegant theory. And, as is becoming more and more clear to intelligent, openminded, factually critical, non-dogmatic people, Consciousness is as fundamental an aspect of Reality, as is Matter and Motion. What is good about this high dimensional theory is that it has the potential to accurately describe the simple basic workings not only of *Physical* matter (well known to us all, though less understood when it comes to subtle physical fields of "subatomic" quanta), but of other kinds of matter as well, like e.g. *Emotional* matter (known from parapsychological and occult research, plus lots of partly factual, partly superstitious folklore, shamanic practices and religious mystical accounts), and *Mental* matter (much less known, although a few non-charlatan truly enlightened men and women - esoteric initiates - know of it from direct experience). These are not mere hypotheses or incorrect convictions of "faith" (all too common amongst Humanity!), but factual realities, all with their respective different characteristic kinds of the Reality aspects of matter, consciousness and motion. In the (serious, reasonable) esoteric literature, two to four more fundamental kinds of matter (with their own characteristic consciousness and motion) are sometimes claimed to exist, but this is to be regarded as mere hypotheses until we have the consciousness development and technology to prove or disprove their reality. However, since all kinds of matter-consciousness-motion are connected with each other and interplay through very subtle Laws of Nature and Laws of Life, there is no realistic hope of ever finding a consistent and complete *solely* Physical theory, because that is just *not* how Reality is! And thus, this elegant high dimensional theory is a potential basic framework (to be expanded upon later!) for explaining and predicting what *may* be explained or predicted about purely physical phenomena, while putting the theory to scientific tests of evidence and practical feasability, while at the same time possible allowing us to connect purely physical phenomena with the well evidenced emotional-physical phenomena of empirical parapsychology.

@eachday9538

5 ай бұрын

A couple hundred years of global scientific effort hasn't done it, so why suprised that it isn't more simple or intuitive? From what I see these guys are attempting to draw the most efficient "straightest" line between observed but so far apparently disparate, elements of physics on the hunch and with some partial evidence that there is an underlying geometry. If successful this would be the simplest representation of the system that is possible. Like one of those subway maps that are reduced down to the most efficient representation. But as the relationships seem to exist in geometric dimensions beyond our evolved ability to comprehend, the crazy geometry and mathematical tools are needed to go beyond what we can fully picture in our mind in one thought. The crazy maths and geomerty step us though what is to the human brain otherwise impossibly disorientating terrain. That's my take anyway.

@wulphstein

5 ай бұрын

@@eachday9538 Does any of this get into what spacetime is made of? How can we talk about quantum gravity without talking about what spacetime is made of? If we knew what spacetime is made of, we could control a piece of ST in the lab. Perhaps we could get a piece of spacetime to store gravitational potential energy. That would lead to new forms of gravity field propulsion or even a low energy Alcubierre drive.

@QuantumGravityResearch

5 ай бұрын

While we are interested in technological applications and believe this is very important, not all scientists are primarily concerned with technology. Similarly, not all mathematicians are primarily concerned with applied math. Nevertheless, sometimes getting the math right can lead to new technology in the future in surprising ways. Think of engineering as combining a bunch of components and physics trying to understand how each of the components work. Before putting the pieces together, sometimes it helps to deeply understand the properties of the pieces.

@wulphstein

5 ай бұрын

@@QuantumGravityResearch I honestly think the concept of creating the laws of physics is simple. The first sphere was a photon of energy E = hf = 10^60 joules (energy of the big bang). From the first expanding sphere came a surge in the number of expanding spheres (the inflationary epoch), and then the rate of creation of new expanding spheres is n (some number) per unit time per unit volume. I don't know what that number is. When these expanding spheres meet at a tangent point, the imaginary terms cancel, and position states are created ontologically: (psi*)psi. Similar with momentum states. What we calculate as eigenstates for position and momentum are ontologically real states that particles can occupy. Since each expanding sphere is a wave function (ontologically), and wave functions have a built in term e^i omega t, then that term functions as a clock. These expanding spheres are the clocks that create time in our universe.

Seems SO(4) is plenty. 4D spacetime interchangeable with energy. But it's all just math and ideas until one can prove it's better than existing models.

What does Clee think of this?

@QuantumGravityResearch

5 ай бұрын

He is interested and is a coauthor on some of the work discussed in this talk. Still, different coauthors have different levels of understanding. To over-simplify, think of this talk as being about classical field theory, while Klee is interested in developing the framework for discrete field theory. Once we make more progress with our discrete simulations, we will be in a better position to see how all of our work fits together. Dr. Marcelo Amaral is also looking at things from a loop quantum gravity perspective.

Why can't quantum gravity be as simple as: Psi(wave function) exists. Expands spherically from a Planck scale point (radius < 10^-35m). These expanding spheres interact to create spacetime. Eigenstates for position and momentum are places that particles can occupy, which is the same definition of space.

@QuantumGravityResearch

5 ай бұрын

I encourage you to explore your idea further to see if you can get a theory of gravity that can describe the perihelion of Mercury! Referring to eigenstates of position and momentum doesn't necessarily imply we have a theory of gravity.

@wulphstein

5 ай бұрын

@@QuantumGravityResearch I'm not trying to describe anything. I'm trying to nudge the physics community towards exploring gravity field propulsion. Quantum entanglements are quanta of spacetime. As such, they can store gravitational potential energy. Centripetal/centrifugal forces acting on optical fiber, because of the Equivalence Principle, can be used to fill quantum entangled photons with gravitational potential energy, that can be released in a way that produces gravitational field propulsion (warp fields). If you had to choose, would you rather have descriptions? Or warp fields?

@b1r2y3n

19 күн бұрын

@@wulphsteinyou’re way behind them. Both in theory and general sophistication of knowledge.

This is really cool, but admittedly way over my head... can we have Marion Kerr help explain it? 😉

I envy this guy's facial hair.

Is any of this had an application on the real world?.

@axetroll

5 ай бұрын

Just explaining reality lol

@QuantumGravityResearch

5 ай бұрын

Not yet, but there's a chance it could in the future. We're excited about the possibility of connecting this work to quasicrystals in the future, which may help understand new paradigms for quantum computers. By studying how the universe efficiently processes quantum information, we might be able to apply this to building quantum computers. For instance, neural networks were discovered by studying the human brain. To this day, people still debate whether our brain is actually a neural network or not, but at this point, the analogy has already led to helpful technology.

Bobby I'm still trying to digest all of this so you're going to get like a nice little 400% watch time out of me but I can't help but thinking. Man it be so sweet to have Marion Kerr mispronouncing things 499.44 percent of us who were perfectly fine with the way she pronounces anything as long as she'll keep doing the explanation thing can we all just take a moment to hope to God Marilyn Kerr came out the other side of the Riders / actors strike whole and happy and probably above all else; still in her house. If you really appreciate an actor now might be a good time to let them know that you love them, in a sense. I know after everything that miss Kerr went through with the original E8 Lie (but pronounced like: Lee's Famous Recipe beats KFC - w/out trying) group..4-all the physics jackals who have zero problems with tearing into some actor, who had a director, who had the script & resources. Yep, blame the zillion-times-easier 2listen2 than Neil-DaGreezy-Tyson sciencey explainer-person. It's hard to watch NdT on Colbert, back when this was a thing.. But the words he used said very little but his emotions were on full display. I've felt off about listening to him ever since that Colbert interview. I would absolutely love to know what Colbert picked up from him - that night. It may, very well, squash my silly, magical-thinking, belief that I pulled relevant information from the facial expressions given off by a guilty NdT. Not that I am some talented mentalist, FBI, or maybe because I wasn't even trying to read him but he was sweating bullets, imho. } ❤❤❤❤❤ & I still love NDT, even if he did the worst thing he was capable of depending on $on✋, & social constraints, & access to the new lines of temptation. Idc. We're just human. We all fall short of who we were striving to be. 😢. I hope I run into a patch of forgiveness when I get my turn to wake up in the Dark City as the murder suspect. Maybe we only remember the bad as this type of detached guilt because of the pain responsibility imposes, even still.. Huh?! What year is this? 😮 Love love love love love ❤

You need to understand that spacetime is made of something. Take a look at the two slit interference pattern. Even Richard Feynman commented that each point along the slit cold be described as an expanding sphere wave function from that point. But what if wave functions are "real" things that exist, however subtle they may be? Pictures of the two slit experiment often depict the wave functions to look like ripples. Ripples are a wave that travels like a circular pattern at the speed of a wave in a medium. If that medium is spacetime, then it's speed would be the speed of light. But what else expands like a ripple away from a point? How about the big bang? The big bang is a lot of energy and spacetime. Spacetime continues to expand even today. What if spacetime is made of wave functions that expand spherically the way Feynman described? Wave functions that expand at the speed of light. Wave functions that can interact with the potential energy of particles and charges in the same way that we are familiar with in quantum mechanics? Calculations of the momentum and position operators in quantum mechanics leads to eigenstates for position and momentum that particles can occupy. How is that not a sufficient definition of spacetime: a position or momentum state that a particle may occupy..? I We can control wave functions as easily as we can create entangled photons. If an experiment could reveal that a quantum entangled could store gravitational potential energy, then that would prove that we had a quantum gravity theory. It would prove that wave functions (beyond the math), but an ontological existence that behaved like both quantum mechanics and relativity. Quantum gravity could be as easy as combining what is known about wave functions that are ontologically real with what is known about spacetime, and see if such expanding wavefunction spheres can account for both QM and relativity. The ideas are a lot easier than all this graduate level math. And they come with an experiment.

@QuantumGravityResearch

5 ай бұрын

We think that Feynman's view of the path integral as an infinite combination of infinite slits is very profound! However, we're focused on finite systems. Imagine each point of spacetime as being a slit. Overall, we want a theory of quantum gravity that at least predicts phenomena that GR successfully describes. The wavefunction in quantum mechanics typically is not even special relativistic. There is a generalized notion of a wavefunction in field theory, such as the one found in the Wheeler-DeWitt equation, but that mathematical framework is actually more sophisticated than some of the math presented here. I do appreciate your comment! Overall, try updating your way of thinking to quantum field theory, rather than quantum mechanics. Typically, spacetime isn't made of a wavefunction, but rather that the wavefunction is in a Hilbert space that contains eigenvalues for points in space (or spacetime if made relativistic, which isn't often done). For relativity, most people go to quantum field theory, as Dirac and others pioneered quantum electrodynamics as a QFT out of studying electrodynamics in quantum mechanics.

@wulphstein

5 ай бұрын

@@QuantumGravityResearch An ontological expanding sphere wave function can be controlled in an experiment. It's gravitational field properties can be controlled experimentally. This would lead to new technology. We can describe it afterwards. Experiments that lead to new technology are more important than descriptions that are all theoretical.