I truly believe that if we assert that all interactions are fundamentally vibrational, then we have simply to assign definitions to the vibrations being contributed by the “observer” to the quantum equation. This concept is by definition, modulation. A well known musical concept.

This by far is the best research in physics and reality today, I can't wait to fund this research in the future, I believe they are on the right track and the incorporation of consciousness has always been the key, the Earth it self is a 3D quasicrystal

@Thundralight

Ай бұрын

They do not know what consciousness is. That is why they avoid it in their equations

How could you observe anything smaller or “smoother” if the tool you use to observe with is itself pixelated? Granted in this universe the smallest observable length is the Planck Length, but that doesn’t necessarily imply that there is nothing smaller. It just suggests that all sizes resolve into a Planck length. It’s like arbitrarily determining what your base size of a Lego block will be and scaling every other block in proportion. Anything that is less than the fundamental building block size will not fit with the rest of the scaffolding. And yet there is evidence that there are smaller measures than a Planck length, for instance in the with of a spectral emission line from an excited element or molecule.

Ive watched this many times, every time i learn somthing new! Thanks Klee!

@QuantumGravityResearch

5 ай бұрын

Thanks for your encouraging words!

if we could hypothetically make a camera as small as a human eye is to the earth, but at that same ratio to a cell, and stick it into a cell to take video i wonder how things would look. Possibly like a camera floating in space I like to imagine. Rather than the universe being a simulation inside of simulation etc, the universe is simply as large as it is small to inifinty.

@henrikljungstrand2036

5 ай бұрын

Yes the simulation hypothesis is ridiculous and blatantly anthropomorphic. A living, conscious, self organizing universe is a much more serious idea.

@bobinthewest8559

5 ай бұрын

Fractals

@RhythmJunkie

4 ай бұрын

@@bobinthewest8559 Fractals are most likely an effect of our limited ego mind, and thus why everything appears to be fractals / fractal based. But when you temporarily separate from the ego-body you merge into the everything, the all’ess of Ultimate Reality etc. and it is here that one experiences something that transcends the fractal universe and you are absolute infinite Love beyond conception ♾️💖

The concept you present in this channel are truly exciting!

@QuantumGravityResearch

5 ай бұрын

Thanks so much for sharing your excitement!

I’ve done some psychokinesis experiments that prove quantum entanglement at the level of events at a distance. If you’re ever interested in using it to help with your research, shoot me a reply. It’s pretty solid and easy to demonstrate. The quantum field of all events seems to be largely influenced by breathwork chemistry and the intensity of focus. It’s subtle when you test it with things like cloud dynamics in the sky, but it solidifies that quantum fluctuations do happen at the level of the observer at any distance. Pretty cool to see if you ask me. Not many people seem to grasp the implications unless they’re already receptive to this stuff, even if they see it on video. I guess you have to be tuned into that information frequency. Pretty sure the same dynamic happens for the spoon benders and remote viewers as well. Bottom line, everything seems to be connected to a single moment that flows in an unseen direction by the collective mind. Seems important. But “the field” seems to choose who gets to understand it and who doesn’t.

Wow, glad I’m still subscribed

@QuantumGravityResearch

5 ай бұрын

Thanks for your support!!

Great to see this video again. I'd love to see you guys to have a conversation with Bashar, ask Darryl.

@SLYdevil

5 ай бұрын

I ❤ the updates

@QuantumGravityResearch

5 ай бұрын

Thanks, great idea! We'll keep this in mind.

It’s about time someone started hammering this out. We haven’t even discovered the fundamental building block of all things. There’s just too much we don’t understand for anyone to be dismissive or dogmatic in their understanding of our reality.

@QuantumGravityResearch

5 ай бұрын

Thanks for your support!

@2Worlds_and_InBetween

4 ай бұрын

yes... I've been saying to myself for quite some time now that particle physics / QM has been obsessed with getting a sharper knife and bigger magnifying glass, and is then surprised to keep finding smaller and smaller slivers of our universe /understanding. the problem being imo, the thinking that 'nature' is sitting inside the test tube happening all isolated from the hand holding the tube... and, the 'minds' working on the problem

This was informative. I also appreciate the straightforward, concise, and minimal ask for such maximum benefits. I also ~observe~ this work continuing to succeed.

For the layperson, "Pure information" manifest in the form of any particular "energy field" which is "quantum in nature" and can be 'super-positional, ominpresent, or transverse the entire universe instantaneously.' The speed of light is NOT the fastest speed in the universe. It is the fastest 'only for matter,' however. We need to stop limiting our thinking in energy/quantum vs matter/mass. They're all the same thing that emerges from the other or dissipates into the other. Light and lightspeed is not the top or endpoint on our measurement scale. Its the "middle ground of energy expression."

@QuantumGravityResearch

5 ай бұрын

Thanks for sharing!

So many theories of everything.

Quantum superposition is easier to code. You do not need to code from beginning to end, you just code when the Universe is actioned upon by an interaction. Take electromagnetism for instance: If I code, at its inception, for all the possibilities of all the ways the Universe might interact with it, that is a crap-ton of code. Much easier to let it reveal itself to the Universe when the Universe, actually, takes notice of it.

@SLYdevil

5 ай бұрын

Like a reverse 20 questions.. Where the universe gives an answer from all the possibilities - but they just make it up once it's noticed.

A pretty common misconception in QM is that wavefunction collapse has something to do with a human mind's act of perception. Collapse is explained just the physical act of measurement. It occurs if people are there or not.

@fatalexcerpts

5 ай бұрын

Yeah in some sense it probably belies the idea that conscious agents is a term that needs a serious reconceptualization.

@v2ike6udik

5 ай бұрын

Ofc it does, it is just not the only thing :) Attention - act of measurement.

@BugRib

5 ай бұрын

Define "measurement". Not wanting to believe that conscious knowledge of a physical system has something to do with it (i.e. wanting to avoid any non-physicalist theories) has led to interpretations of quantum mechanics as outlandish as the Many Worlds Interpretation. Personally, I think the simplest and most straightforward explanation is better, even if it's of a non-materialist/non-physicalist explanation, and several of the most accomplished and well-known founders of QM thought the same...such as Schrodinger himself (of Schrodinger Equation fame). That said, I find this organization and their very well-produced videos a bit questionable. I still like watching them though, haha.

@v2ike6udik

5 ай бұрын

@@BugRib "non-materialist/non-physicalist" are radiowaves non-material/non-physical or magic or what. can anything be non-physical? show me smth nonphysical or what i clamid to be.

A tetrahedral space-time pixel has seemed logical to me for a long time. Energy seems to like spheres though 😅

Thank you for what you and your team does.

I love you guys.. I really appreciate your brains .. thankful you are here and I can watch you

I'm so fascinated with quantum mechanics, but I wish I didn't feel like an ape trying to understand. No matter, I appreciate all of your hard work and dedication, please keep the "information" flowing!

@QuantumGravityResearch

4 ай бұрын

Thank you very much for your support!!

@2Worlds_and_InBetween

4 ай бұрын

it's not that hard and you can grasp it all you have to do is throw away most of what you have learned /understand about the nature of things 😊 best of luck

@astroking3043

4 ай бұрын

All quantum things at the nano scales can be duplicated at the macro scale, including the double slit using milimeter size balls it's the same physics

If you've gone around the circle expecting different results and the same insanity emerges again, it means you didn't evolve the process. What I find amazing is we have all these incredible teachings, yet when the Student becomes the Master, the old Masters fail to hear thus trapping themselves within the Procrustean bed of their making.

@voteloonydotcom

5 ай бұрын

Are you saying that Old masters don't evolve but students do?

@user-lu1pn6to9e

5 ай бұрын

Damn that is so well said..

@2Worlds_and_InBetween

4 ай бұрын

yep, I agree I often wonder if, as one grows into the "master" a funding framework, or cage, is built around themselves causing a fear of stepping out into the void of the unknown on the way to the new idea(s) /ways of thinking

@just1john

4 ай бұрын

Meanwhile, earth has been hijacked using mind-control since changing original Ancient Greek and Pali terms to suite these BRAINWASHING TIMES. But hey... Master on as per gang affiliations (aka secret societies).... hello.

Marion Kerr is my favorite

@QuantumGravityResearch

5 ай бұрын

Thanks, we're glad you enjoyed!

Mind bending! Thanks

I don't know what's more exciting: the possibility for a Theory of Everything, or Marion's hips 😍

Entertaining and fun... Any testable predictions? (see you at the eschaton)

Deep! Thank You!

Have you heard from Mr E8 himself Garrett Lisi recently ?

@QuantumGravityResearch

5 ай бұрын

Yes, one of our scientists had a brief discussion with him recently. Look out for more content soon on revisiting Lisi's dream!

Well done team. Best info ive seen that doesnt seem like its misinfo

@QuantumGravityResearch

5 ай бұрын

Thanks so much for your encouraging words!

Brilliant!!

Finish the mission? ... The mission is never "finished". There is always more to do.

Thank you for this video

TOE Idea: Short version: (currently dependent upon the results of my gravity test): The 'gem' photon is the eternally existent energy unit of this universe. The strong and weak nuclear forces are derivatives of the electromagnetic ('em') interactions between quarks and electrons. The nucleus is a magnetic field boundary. 'Gravity' is a part of electromagnetic radiation, gravity acting 90 degrees to the 'em' modalities, which of course act 90 degrees to each other.

@QuantumGravityResearch

5 ай бұрын

It's quite challenging to get strong and weak nuclear forces to be "derived" from electromagnetic interactions, but best of luck! There is also some history looking into a complex formalism of mass and electric charge with this 90 degrees you mentioned, but this was largely inspired by Newtonian gravity and electrodynamics, not general relativity. Thanks for sharing your idea.

@charlesbrightman4237

5 ай бұрын

@@QuantumGravityResearch Consider the longer version of my TOE idea and after that some items that 'if' my TOE idea is really true, (currently dependent upon the results of my gravity test, but 'if' true), could potentially answer. Otherwise, please answer those items as best as you are able to. (This post and 1 after this post): THEORY OF EVERYTHING IDEA: Revised TOE: 3/25/2017b. My Current TOE: THE SETUP: 1. Modern science currently recognizes four forces of nature: The strong nuclear force, the weak nuclear force, gravity, and electromagnetism. 2. In school we are taught that with magnetism, opposite polarities attract and like polarities repel. But inside the arc of a large horseshoe magnet it's the other way around, like polarities attract and opposite polarities repel. (I have proved this to myself with magnets and anybody with a large horseshoe magnet and two smaller bar magnets can easily prove this to yourself too. It occurs at the outer end of the inner arc of the horseshoe magnet.). 3. Charged particles have an associated magnetic field with them. 4. Protons and electrons are charged particles and have their associated magnetic fields with them. 5. Photons also have both an electric and a magnetic component to them. FOUR FORCES OF NATURE DOWN INTO TWO: 6. When an electron is in close proximity to the nucleus, it would basically generate a 360 degree spherical magnetic field. 7. Like charged protons would stick together inside of this magnetic field, while simultaneously repelling opposite charged electrons inside this magnetic field, while simultaneously attracting the opposite charged electrons across the inner portion of the electron's moving magnetic field. 8. There are probably no such thing as "gluons" in actual reality. 9. The strong nuclear force and the weak nuclear force are probably derivatives of the electro-magnetic field interactions between electrons and protons. 10. The nucleus is probably an electro-magnetic field boundary. 11. Quarks also supposedly have a charge to them and then would also most likely have electro-magnetic fields associated with them, possibly a different arrangement for each of the six different type of quarks. 12. The interactions between the quarks EM forces are how and why protons and neutrons formulate as well as how and why protons and neutrons stay inside of the nucleus and do not just pass through as neutrinos do. THE GEM FORCE INTERACTIONS AND QUANTA: 13. Personally, I currently believe that the directional force in photons is "gravity". It's the force that makes the sine wave of EM energy go from a wide (maximum extension) to a point (minimum extension) of a moving photon and acts 90 degrees to the EM forces which act 90 degrees to each other. When the EM gets to maximum extension, "gravity" flips and EM goes to minimum, then "gravity" flips and goes back to maximum, etc, etc. A stationary photon would pulse from it's maximum extension to a point possibly even too small to detect, then back to maximum, etc, etc. (The 'stationary photon' does not really exist, it is mentioned basically only to help describe what a stationary photon would do.) 14. I also believe that a pulsating, swirling singularity (which is basically a pulsating, swirling 'gem' photon) is the energy unit in this universe. 15. When these pulsating, swirling energy units interact with other energy units, they tangle together and can interlock at times. Various shapes (strings, spheres, whatever) might be formed, which then create sub-atomic material, atoms, molecules, and everything in existence in this universe. 16. When the energy units unite and interlock together they would tend to stabilize and vibrate. 17. I believe there is probably a Photonic Theory Of The Atomic Structure. 18. Everything is basically "light" (photons) in a universe entirely filled with "light" (photons). THE MAGNETIC FORCE SPECIFICALLY: 19. When the electron with it's associated magnetic field goes around the proton with it's associated magnetic field, internal and external energy oscillations are set up. 20. When more than one atom is involved, and these energy frequencies align, they add together, specifically the magnetic field frequency. 21. I currently believe that this is where a line of flux originates from, aligned magnetic field frequencies. NOTES: 22. The Earth can be looked at as being a massive singular interacting photon with it's magnetic field, electrical surface field, and gravity, all three photonic forces all being 90 degrees from each other. 23. The flat spiral galaxy can be looked at as being a massive singular interacting photon with it's magnetic fields on each side of the plane of matter, the electrical field along the plane of matter, and gravity being directed towards the galactic center's black hole where the gravitational forces would meet, all three photonic forces all being 90 degrees from each other. 24. As below in the singularity, as above in the galaxy and probably universe as well. 25. I believe there are only two forces of nature, Gravity and EM, (GEM). Due to the stability of the GEM with the energy unit, this is also why the forces of nature haven't evolved by now. Of which with the current theory of understanding, how come the forces of nature haven't evolved by now since the original conditions acting upon the singularity aren't acting upon them like they originally were, billions of years have supposedly elapsed, in a universe that continues to expand and cool, with energy that could not be created nor destroyed would be getting less and less dense? My theory would seem to make more sense if in fact it is really true. I really wonder if it is in fact really true. 26. And the universe would be expanding due to these pulsating and interacting energy units and would also allow galaxies to collide, of which, how could galaxies ever collide if they are all speeding away from each other like is currently taught? DISCLAIMER: 27. As I as well as all of humanity truly do not know what we do not know, the above certainly could be wrong. It would have to be proved or disproved to know for more certainty.

@charlesbrightman4237

5 ай бұрын

@@QuantumGravityResearch IN THE INTEREST OF FINDING THE THEORY OF EVERYTHING: SOME THINGS MODERN SCIENCE DOES NOT APPARENTLY KNOW: Consider the following: a. Numbers: Modern science does not even know how numbers and certain mathematical constants exist for math to do what math does. (And nobody as of yet has been able to show me how numbers and certain mathematical constants can come from the Standard Model Of Particle Physics). b. Space: Modern science does not even know what 'space' actually is nor how it could actually warp and expand. c. Time: Modern science does not even know what 'time' actually is nor how it could actually warp and vary. d. Gravity: Modern science does not even know what 'gravity' actually is nor how gravity actually does what it appears to do. And for those who claim that 'gravity' is matter warping the fabric of spacetime, see 'b' and 'c' above. e. Speed of Light: 'Speed', distance divided by time, distance being two points in space with space between those two points. But yet, here again, modern science does not even know what space and time actually are that makes up 'speed' and they also claim that space can warp and expand and time can warp and vary, so how could they truly know even what the speed of light actually is that they utilize in many of the formulas? Speed of light should also warp, expand and vary depending upon what space and time it was in. And if the speed of light can warp, expand and vary in space and time, how then do far away astronomical observations actually work that are based upon light and the speed of light that could warp, expand and vary in actual reality? f. Photons: A photon swirls with the 'e' and 'm' energy fields 90 degrees to each other. A photon is also considered massless. What keeps the 'e' and 'm' energy fields together across the vast universe? And why doesn't the momentum of the 'e' and 'm' energy fields as they swirl about not fling them away from the central area of the photon? And electricity is electricity and magnetism is magnetism varying possibly only in energy modality, energy density and energy frequency. Why doesn't the 'e' and 'm' of other photons and of matter basically tear apart a photon going across the vast universe? Also, 'if' a photon actually red shifts, where does the red shifted energy go and why does the photon red shift? And for those who claim space expanding causes a photon to red shift, see 'b' above. Why does radio 'em' (large 'em' waves) have low energy and gamma 'em' (small 'em' waves) have high energy? And for those who say E = hf; see also 'b' and 'c' above. (f = frequency, cycles per second. But modern science claims space can warp and expand and time can warp and vary. If 'space' warps and expands and/or 'time' warps and varies, what does that do to 'E'? And why doesn't 'E' keep space from expanding and time from varying?). g. Energy: Modern science claims that energy cannot be created nor destroyed, it's one of the foundations of physics. Hence, energy is either truly a finite amount and eternally existent, or modern science is wrong. First Law Of Thermodynamics: "Energy can neither be created nor destroyed." How exactly is 'energy' eternally existent? h. Existence and Non-Existence side by side throughout all of eternity. How?

@charlesbrightman4237

5 ай бұрын

@@QuantumGravityResearch Oh, and since you are 'QuantumGravityResearch', here is my current gravity test for the above TOE idea: GRAVITY: WARNING: (CONTAINS EXISTENTIAL MATTERS): Here is the test for the 'gravity' portion of my TOE idea. I do not have the necessary resources to do the test but maybe you or someone else reading this does, will do the test, then tell the world what is found out either way. a. Imagine a 12 hour clock. b. Put a magnetic field across from the 3 to 9 o'clock positions. c. Put an electric field across from the 6 to 12 o'clock positions. (The magnetic field and electric field would be 90 degrees to each other and should be polarized so as to complement each other.) d. Direct a high powered laser through the center of the clock at 90 degrees to the em fields. e. Do this with the em fields on and off. (The em fields could be varied in size, strength, density and depth. The intent would be to energy frequency match the laser and em fields for optimal results, cancelling out the em modalities of the laser, thereby leaving behind the gravity modality.) f. Look for any gravitational / anti-gravitational effects. (Including the utilization of ferro cells so as to be able to actually see the energy field movements.) (And note: if done right, it's possible a mini gravitational black hole might form. Be ready for it. In addition, it's possible a neutrino might be formed before the black hole stage, the neutrino being a substance with a very high gravitational modality with very low 'em' modalities.) (An alternative to the above would be to direct 3 high powered lasers, or a single high powered laser split into 3 beams, each adjustable to achieve the above set up, all focused upon a single point in space. Maybe I could concentrate the Sun's 'em' into a high powered laser. Might even work with the correct set up breaking the Sun's 'em' down into single 'em' energy frequencies acting like a single energy frequency laser. A high energy laser powered by the Sun. Cool, or actually pretty hot. More than one way to build a laser.) 'If' effects are noted, 'then' further research could be done. 'If' effects are not noted, 'then' my latest TOE idea is wrong. But still, we would know what 'gravity' was not, which is still something in the scientific world. (But hey, might even still get a Sun powered laser, which of course could even be utliized in outer space for various agendas.). This test can speak for itself. It will either be true, partly true, or not true at all. It will either show what gravity truly is, might be, or is not. Science still wins either way and moves forward. * And note: Whether my gravity test or another's, a gravitational black hole would have to be formed to prove the concept as being really true. A gravitational black hole that 'if' self fed itself, could literally wipe out this Earth and all on it, possibly this solar system, possibly put a black hole in this section of our galaxy, and potentially even causing a ripple effect in this galaxy and surrounding universe. But hey, if it does, no worries. Nobody would be left to prosecute those who did so. (Possibly famous last words: "Hey, it worked. Ooooppppssss.................) But as NASA has already proven that low gravity conditions over a prolonged period of time is harmful to the human species, and large rotating space ships won't really work for space bases on planets and moons, those space bases probably being needed somewhere along the way out of this solar system and galaxy, we need to figure out what gravity truly is and see if we can generate artificial gravity so as to have smaller space ships and proper gravity conditions for space bases on planets and moons. Otherwise, at least all human life will most probably die and go extinct one day. Currently, no exceptions. * Added note: Just trying to save at least 1 single species from this Earth to exist beyond this Earth so that life itself from this Earth has continued meaning and purpose to. Gives me something to do while I exist, otherwise, what is it all and everything for? Even if my TOE idea were correct, but if it did not help species survive beyond this Earth, what good would it ultimately be? So, are you feeling lucky? Doing nothing and at least the entire human species eventually dies and goes extinct with a high degree of certainty. Doing a gravity test, (mine and/or another's), and there is at least a slim chance of literally wiping out this entire Earth and all on it, and possibly more. Do you and other's truly want me to prove my TOE idea as being really true? But also: Questions: Are at least some black holes in this universe due to a species who were trying to discern what 'gravity' truly was, came up with a test to do so, were successful, but the black hole generated (to prove what gravity truly was) self fed itself and wiped them and at least their entire planet out? What species might have existed where a black hole now resides? (Since all of life itself is ultimately meaningless in the grand of scheme of things anyway, do the gravity test and see what occurs?) * Added note: Suggestion: 'IF' society did not want to do the gravity test, one suggestion might be to at least create a model as if it were true, then see how that model matches with observations and predictions. It might be possible to discern the theory of everything without actually generating a gravitational black hole (which would definitely prove the TOE idea as being really true).

@thoughticality6044

Ай бұрын

​@@charlesbrightman4237I would be love to see some math behind this so I can dive deeper into this idea. Sounds very fun!

It depends on your definition of prediction. Considering a system of agents that depends on the actions (not predictable behaviour but genuine actions) of any and each of these agentes, and of which you are part of as one of the agents, then you get two premises: the methodology itself must be non-representational, the "measurements" are not based on fundamental standards - at least not does which are relavant for prediction - but on the "singularity", or, to avoid ambiguesness, "unique, genuinly new gaps" in the otherwise regular and predictable pattersn (that part can be measure in representational ways). You may not get a very precise output of an image (representation) as result, but you get an exact diretion of orientation. In addition, you may use exact images (representations) to shape the final image more precisely, if your prediction on direction was correct. So far, I can get prediction for 2 years. It is further important to keep "control points" at certain sequences of successes.

i would love to see quantum gravity research's view on theories like the ctmu in how it organizes bottom up emergence

@QuantumGravityResearch

5 ай бұрын

QGR's "Self-Simulation Hypothesis Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics" did cite Langan's work, feel free to take a look! www.mdpi.com/1099-4300/22/2/247/htm

@JAYMOAP

5 ай бұрын

​@@QuantumGravityResearchit's 2 borrowed equation and a bunch of nonsense. If you want to publish, arxiv is the standard.

@TempGuy

5 ай бұрын

​​@@JAYMOAParxiv is not Peer reviewed and their paper is not nonsense so it gets accepted in an actual Peer reviewed journal. your claim about their paper being nonsense is nonsense in itself and not justified. because i can have a scientific paper punished because there is evidence to support it. you calling it nonsense will not change those facts lol. facts don't care about your opinions. so stay mad in the comments, that's the best you can do

@JAYMOAP

5 ай бұрын

@@TempGuy you don't understand what you re talking about. Go to arxiv, and see any physics paper contains proof of statements with equations. Not laying out 2 in the entire paper, which is snitched from somewhere else, then write a 10 pages hypothesis. It's not how science work.

@2Worlds_and_InBetween

4 ай бұрын

​@@QuantumGravityResearchthank you for the link and the great insights

There is no separation. the most profound ( & unexpected) spiritual experience of my life involved the dissolution of the ego, and the expansion into all that it is ( ineffable bliss) -more real than any of this separation we call “reality’-

I’m no physicist, so I could never really explain what I mean when I say what I’ve said for a long time… which is that I believe consciousness is the most fundamental aspect of the universe.

@QuantumGravityResearch

5 ай бұрын

Excellent, yes, it is hard to describe concretely, but we're trying our best! Of course, many great thinkers have considered this view, we are not the first.

I'll sign up. We need your work.

@QuantumGravityResearch

5 ай бұрын

Thanks so much for your support! Everyone at QGR appreciates you.

Then if those values change, the time can be reversed... the limits are not the same.... the quantum results may be therfore explained?

I'll believe whatever she wants me to believe! ❤

keep going. Your on the money. It’s in the geometry.

You're getting closer to the answer.🎉🎉🎉

@QuantumGravityResearch

5 ай бұрын

Thanks, we'll keep digging!

Thanks!

@QuantumGravityResearch

5 ай бұрын

Thanks so much for your support, everyone at Quantum Gravity Research appreciates it!

What happens if I face 87 degrees and I move one planck length and my friend faces 90 degrees and also moves one planck length. We both start at the same point. What is our distance from eachother?

Ive never clicked so fast! Soon the world will awaken ti these absolute truths

@QuantumGravityResearch

5 ай бұрын

We appreciate your kind words!

“I don't want to believe. I want to know.” Carl Sagan

This may be what I was looking for in explaining that there is no interface between the spiritual and physical because there doesn’t need to be when they’re both one.

@mcxo-dd66

5 ай бұрын

are you not the interface?

The big observer - the universe - grants me time for an experiment: one planck-time. The experiment is an attempt to make a particle travel at high speed, and measure how far it travels during that planck-time. Will it travel a planck-length? Which would be the according speed? Will it travel zero, when it enters too slow? Will it travel two planck lenghts the next time or one after next time? How does it play out, when this particle actually jitters or thumps through these planck lengths? Is there any effect of acceleration, or does it teleport or beam from one position to the next, that is a planck-length away?

“Fools rush in where angels fear to tread” - Alexander Pope

I guess you could call us spirits, like the information we are flowing through the brain. a human brain transforms the energy and details absorbed by our sensors and then grow cells that reflect the sensory input but also patterns them to match as well. It’s like it’s all fitting together and the puzzle pieces move as you take more in. A human body expanded just like the language because the transforming combo masher aka the brain and its feedback to the body. Our expansion.

So inspiring...

REALITY AND EXPERIENCES: Whatever 'reality' truly is, it manifests itself in the 'experiences' experienced.

one man podcast with multiple hosts am not complaining thou

We shouldn't think of light as a constant. Time is also not a constant as you explained brilliantly.

What do you guys think about the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle?

@QuantumGravityResearch

5 ай бұрын

Yes, this uncertainty principle is foundational to quantum mechanics and is intimately tied with how position and momentum cannot be determined simultaneously. This relates to how "quantum mechanics is noncommutative". Fun fact, the commutation relations of quantum mechanics with [x,p] = i * hbar can be generalized further. The notion of "generalized uncertainty relations" is still an active area of research to this day. At Quantum Gravity Research, we also have been looking into types of generalized uncertainty relations. One of our scientists suspect these might be helpful for understanding the discrete structure of quantum gravity. Excellent question!

Here you are conscious, free will. Yet there is no path to see. We have been playing with geometry since the last civilization disappeared, deep in the known, while in the shallows is an answer. Have you ever thought of creating space/time, creating a solid and placing on it a fractal then giving it a time line and watching what it does?

@b1r2y3n

14 күн бұрын

Have you ever thought that you’re spouting gobbledygook?

Just donated, thank you

@QuantumGravityResearch

5 ай бұрын

Thank you so much for your support. Our team at Quantum Gravity Research appreciates your contribution.

Content covered is excellent- actresses is great in all videos

Saben de la teoria de la conciencia base?

You unlock this door with the key of imagination. Beyond it is another dimension - a dimension of sound, a dimension of sight, a dimension of mind. You're moving into a land of both shadow and substance, of things and ideas. You've just crossed over into the Twilight Zone.

Would like to know further updates on Research or possibly large donation or Grant no promises

@QuantumGravityResearch

5 ай бұрын

Hi Jason, thanks so much for your support! Our team is hard at work with research. Thanks for the feedback, I'll mention this to the team, we're currently working on new content as well. Find our latest research publications here: quantumgravityresearch.org/portfolio/all-papers/ For larger donations, consider this link: quantumgravityresearch.org/support-us/ For information about possible grant proposals: quantumgravityresearch.org/grants/

@jasonb4703

5 ай бұрын

@@QuantumGravityResearch that is awesome because I'm looking forward to seeing new content and look forward to the further conversations and possibly sharing the ideas that we talked about

I could Never bum people for money on social media or in person. When people are making others feel obligated it makes me want to leave.

Thank you Naara....❤️❤️❤️

Consciousness begins and ends when it reaches a dead end! Time powers the suns biosphere; time generates light, energy and mass, time has brought this avenue to an end.

Tak!

@QuantumGravityResearch

5 ай бұрын

Thanks so much for your support, we're dedicated to providing more transformative research and content in the future.

4:37 If the Universe and the speed of light is a definable theory that your questioning, why wouldn't you question plank length and pixel limitations? You all are definitely on to something here and even though I work in a completely different field, I see overlap that might be worth exploring and discussions... Keep the data coming and thank you for opening my mind to such eligent work!

Danke!

@QuantumGravityResearch

5 ай бұрын

Truly, thank you so much for your support! Our team appreciates it.

The universe is simply a lazy man laid out, resting beneath a tree.

Thank you for your efforts for science and awareness ☮️🌏🌍🌎🫂✌️

Physics is an element in conciousness conciousness is not an element in physics. Reality according to Pantajali is triangulated by perception/observed/experience - percieving/observing/experiencing - perciever/observer/experiencer. Whatever one you chose. However the major problem is the false assumption that reality has have shape and form when in fact enlightened awareness proves that the eternal reality is formless. This ABSOLUTE REALITY is the constant whereas realities if shape and form that are triangulated are variable realities emanating from the constant eternal reality which is outside of space and time ...space and time and everything are emanations of the formless reality. You can clearly see that the reality in turn is an emanation of ourselves. Our self is an emanation of our Self as in immortal formless souls. The Self is where all is one and one is all.

I feel like the aufio improved compared to previous versions of this video 🤔?

The smarter you become the crazier you sounds to stupid people. You are onto something and I'm down with your struggle.

Did I hear that the a frame of reality is 10 to the 44?

@QuantumGravityResearch

5 ай бұрын

Yes, the Planck time is roughly 5 x 10^-44 seconds, so the Planck frequency is 2 x 10^43 Hz. In other words, there are almost 10^44 Planck moments within 5 seconds.

Is there an investment pool?

We compare the as above So below simulation 30 to our own understanding of quantum physics when in fact it's much further beyond that and that perhaps it didn't even need a quantum computer but that's as far as we understand it to be so quantum physics it is

Well this is a nice surprise

Absolutely excellent video. ❤

Look up Dan Winter for his connection of gravity to consciousness and our DNA

I understand this they psychedelics. I understand the geometrical language to reality. My trips start out by seeing geometric shapes. Those shapes then add lines and more shapes while dancing. In that dance, you see reality. It’s remarkable. I’ve always wondered what the universal language would be. And always had a feeling it would lie within geometry and symbols.

If space is discreet, then can something like a circle really exist? Can pi exist in a discrete universe? Or any irrational number?

Speed of light = rendering speed of thaught

Reuploading old videos, are we?: kzread.info/dash/bejne/qWSu1s6Ccby6c7g.htmlsi=chXI6efWUeYpDeAg

Its because the distance between two objects determines the speed at which light can travel. You heard it from a man named BigSlimThic, dont forget it,

I love the name Klee, sounds like Kwee which is also a good name.

28:38 But Klee! Could they excrete?!

Grazie.

@QuantumGravityResearch

5 ай бұрын

Thanks so much for all of your support, Piero!

It is not "observing" that causes decoherence. It is the interaction which is subsequently interpreted as an observation which is the "cause". But interactions which are never interpreted also cause decoherence. The conflation of interaction with observation is ancient and long since debunked misinterpretation quantum properties.

I remember watching this video when you guys first released it. I had a question about it. Does the tetrahedron, the way it’s explained in this video, exist? Or is it a theory?

@ninjuhdelic

5 ай бұрын

Oooo boy do I have a wormhole for you. Check out sacred geometry, bio geometry, and cymatics. With cymatics you can see visual examples with water and sound

I have my own version of emergence theory and some things mentioned in this video seem without logic or systematically consistent

It is very widely known. That a person can store information in the DMT realm, and a completely seperate person can retrieve it. This principle leads most people to believe that the DMT realm is real, and as of yet, there is more evidence to suggest that it is unlike the opposite. Given that foundation. There are entities in that realm that are smarter, more knowledgeable and more powerful than us. They are the beings that already know the answer to this question of what exactly is gravity. So... Why don't you just ask them? You are the people clever enough to talk to them about it. And youre the only ones who will receive information and actually be able to understand it. So for the love of all things groundbreaking, atleast consider it. Because its a strong viable option.

Nice

240 vertices? not 2^8 = 256 ? where are the 16?

@QuantumGravityResearch

5 ай бұрын

Good question, it turns out that the E8 polytope does not follow 2^8. The E8 Lie group has 248 generators. The root system geometry removes 8 commuting generators to give 240 root vectors or vertices in 8D. There is also Cl(8), the 8D Clifford algebra with 256 degrees of freedom. Some have thought that Cl(8) may relate to E8, but it's not that straightforward. It is known that Cl(16) actually contains E8, but that algebra is huge. So much math... It can be hard to keep track of it all.

13hpurs ago? Is this dejavu or just a rerun?

If time isn't linear, and so as you say, what happens next is therefore inevitable; well, how is this not an example of determinism?

Looks like a lot of smart people are converging on the same stuff

@QuantumGravityResearch

5 ай бұрын

It's exciting times, especially to see how ideas that seem different may actually be leading towards a similar path.

Count on me!

17:20 The Ender Dragon! 🎉

You can’t derive the speed of light from Maxwell’s Equations?

I’m just wondering why Einstein sounds like an Italian plumber? 😂😎 Keep up the good work!

@QuantumGravityResearch

5 ай бұрын

Hah, thanks for watching!

Sharing is caring

@QuantumGravityResearch

5 ай бұрын

Thanks for following us! Look out for new content to come out soon.

“Meaning is a comparison” Really? I’d like to see you argue that point with a cognitive scientist like John Vervaeke. Meaning seems to have both emergent and emanating properties as it requires that you have the ability to distinguish what is good, and what is good is often aligned values with a higher purpose.

I have considered truth to be a perpetual state of emergency for a long time