17:04 kind suggestion for the sake of Allah: what make videos more interesting , and more watchable, is less interruption, when a question is asked, a time given for the guest to answer... especially if he is specialized in the subject.... many of us do this mistakes if you watch upto this point, most of the introduction to the topic have these interruption resulting in lose of track... I love your videos and like them, it is just a suggestion. may Allah reward you for your effort both of you

@mhmadbedrddeen3414

4 күн бұрын

tell him to bring a shia scholar not a shia opponent to speak about shisim

@AlwaysHope_

4 күн бұрын

Sutil I very much like your suggestion.

@sutil5078

4 күн бұрын

@@AlwaysHope_ thanks, that is very kind of you sister.

Love the into lol

@themartianbuggy3171

5 күн бұрын

Bast boost Nasheed intro

Honestly i love this stream! I am so in sync with rumzi cz im literally having the same questions as we are going along the stream

This stream could have been amazing if it had some structure. A lot of knowledge and info but jumps all over the place in terms of topics and timeline

9:22 it would have been better at the start that he gives v very short summary (2 min about the origin of Shia, 2 min of idioloigical part, 2 min of the twlevers) instead of spending 10 min to decide "what to talk about.

@Submitting_Warner

5 күн бұрын

Definitely would have been good but the topic of the Shia is so broad allocating 2 minutes for each subtopic would be impossible. Even 5 minutes or more many not have been enough

@sutil5078

5 күн бұрын

@@Submitting_Warner I agree , I meant very basic level (definition wise, the twilvers are the... the origin is ....... the..) I said in another comment the best choice is to give Farid 15 or 20 minute to give introduction (INTRO) , I agree no one can cover any subject in 2 min.. except giving his own address to a delivery guy. But Brother Rumzi was busy controlling the chat and , and asked many questions while fareed was in the middle of answering ... it was very difficult to watch.. I could not , I had to pause ever 10 min and do another thing, I am still not in the middle of the video.. because of that

@AlwaysHope_

4 күн бұрын

@@sutil5078I feel the same way to many interruptions. Farid is to kind to speak up when this happens.

@sutil5078

4 күн бұрын

@@AlwaysHope_ exactly nice observation, I felt bad for Farid being interrupted, at one point Farid explained something important and saw the guy eyes looking at the chat and said "are you with me or with the chat?" I don't know if you watch that about an hour in the video... I felt uncomfortable for Frid, he was gracious though about it..

I watch now upto 36, and it is frustrating. It shows how important is "introduction" where he lay out the history in 10 or 15 minutes THEN THEN , and ONLY THEN, he is asked.

@sutil5078

5 күн бұрын

I don't know why the vehement justification of the host "I thought that, but now, I used to think this, but now .. etc.." , why reviewing personal errors when Farid is there to explain all this. it is ok, many people don't memorize history of specific period if they never studied it. Again that is why it is important to have a basic structure: introduction to the split, questions about it etc, that is why people let the guest give an introduction for 15 minutes or 20 minutes, then questions.

@yourfriends

5 күн бұрын

@@sutil5078 I recommend checking Farid’s articles in gift2shias, twelvershia & youpuncturedtheark

@AlwaysHope_

4 күн бұрын

@@sutil5078Sutil I totally agree you need a good format & structure in speaking to each other.

2:11:31 clarification: Abu Lahb, is not from the prophet family islamcally speaking at least from Sunnah (sunni) perspective, etc.. Remember Allah said to Noah regarding his son "Innahu laisa min Ahalik" “My Lord! Verily my son is from my family” (Q 11:45), Allah responded, “He is not from your family. He is, rather, a deed unrighteous” (Q 11:46).

@flansable

5 күн бұрын

All the muslims amongst the family of the prophet peace be upon him are ahl albayt. This includes AlAbbas and his whole lineage, Abu Sufyan and his whole lineage, Hassan and his whole lineage. As well as many others. Whether you like it or not they are Ahl Albayt. I'll use the same verse you quoted to throw people out of the family and quote to you that Noah means his entire family there not just his son.

@electrozromgamers1781

5 күн бұрын

@@flansable nope u In fact are wrong ahl ulbayt are the people that are descendents of The Prophet s.a.w u can search up who the ahl ulbayt are learn knowledge before u talk u cannot disrespect the family of the Prophet by saying that, The same way we can say that the Syeds also are from the other lineage. Syeds are the only lineage of Prophet and the house of Muhammad s.a.w are the AhlulBayt

@electrozromgamers1781

5 күн бұрын

@@flansable the AhlulBayt does include the 12 Imams

@flansable

5 күн бұрын

@@electrozromgamers1781 the AhlAlbayt includes AlHassan according to you, but none of his kids. It includes Ali but only 2 of his kids. You people have a mental illness not an understanding of how a family tree works. The real AhlAlbayt of the prophet peace be upon him includes ALL his family including ALL his wives. Whether you like it or not.

@sutil5078

5 күн бұрын

flansable, I meant the time stamp that I gave in the original post, they talked about Abu lahb as if he were from ahl arrasul..

Also i will suggest you to talk with a shia scholar on this topi so that you can get the right information about our belief

if you are honest in knowing what shia believe it was better to bring a shia scholar and ask him, not a shia opponent who will be bias, it's like a Christian bringing David wood to speak about Islam, for real !!!

@indiantechsupport7109

4 күн бұрын

Exactly, he brought the guy whose only job is to rant against shia

@mhmadbedrddeen3414

4 күн бұрын

@@indiantechsupport7109 I was on the live they time me out from commenting because I was responding to him, that's who much they are weak

Assalamualaikum. I need the proofs of corruption of the old testament please

@Asphyx1ator

6 күн бұрын

We dont need any proof big dawg, we have the Quran

@jameel7455

6 күн бұрын

@@Asphyx1ator No brother. I need to show it to a Christian. I believe in the Qur'an but he doesn't right?

@A___S____N6

6 күн бұрын

Few of them are. // 2 Samuel 21:19 // CEB: "Elhanan... killed Goliath." // NIV: "Elhanan... killed the brother of Goliath." // 2 Samuel 21:8 // NIV: "the five sons of Saul’s daughter Merab." // KJV: "the five sons of Michal the daughter of Saul." // 2 Chronicles 22:2 // NIV: "Ahaziah was twenty-two years old." // KJV: "Ahaziah was forty-two years old." // Psalm 145:13 // KJV: "Thy kingdom is an everlasting kingdom..." // NIV: "Your kingdom is an everlasting kingdom... The Lord is trustworthy in all he promises..." // Deuteronomy 32:8 // KJV: "...according to the number of the children of Israel." // ESV: "...according to the number of the sons of God." Omitted Verses/Sentences from Old Testament // 1 Samuel 13:1 // KJV: "Saul reigned one year; and when he had reigned two years over Israel..." // NIV: Omitted in some translations due to textual uncertainty. // 1 Samuel 17:12 // KJV: "Now David was the son of that Ephrathite of Bethlehemjudah, whose name was Jesse..." // NIV: Omitted in some translations due to manuscript variations. // Exodus 23:23 // KJV: "For mine Angel shall go before thee, and bring thee in unto the Amorites..." // NIV: Omitted or phrased differently in some translations.

@A___S____N6

6 күн бұрын

// 2 Samuel 21:19 // CEB: "Elhanan... killed Goliath." // NIV: "Elhanan... killed the brother of Goliath." // 2 Samuel 21:8 // NIV: "the five sons of Saul’s daughter Merab." // KJV: "the five sons of Michal the daughter of Saul." // 2 Chronicles 22:2 // NIV: "Ahaziah was twenty-two years old." // KJV: "Ahaziah was forty-two years old." // Psalm 145:13 // KJV: "Thy kingdom is an everlasting kingdom..." // NIV: "Your kingdom is an everlasting kingdom... The Lord is trustworthy in all he promises..." // Deuteronomy 32:8 // KJV: "...according to the number of the children of Israel." // ESV: "...according to the number of the sons of God." // Omitted Verses/Sentences from Old Testament // 1 Samuel 13:1 // KJV: "Saul reigned one year; and when he had reigned two years over Israel..." // NIV: Omitted in some translations due to textual uncertainty. // 1 Samuel 17:12 // KJV: "Now David was the son of that Ephrathite of Bethlehemjudah, whose name was Jesse..." // NIV: Omitted in some translations due to manuscript variations. // Exodus 23:23 // KJV: "For mine Angel shall go before thee, and bring thee in unto the Amorites..." // NIV: Omitted or phrased differently in some translations.

@A___S____N6

6 күн бұрын

Few of them are. // 2 Samuel 21:19 // CEB: "Elhanan... killed Goliath." // NIV: "Elhanan... killed the brother of Goliath." // 2 Samuel 21:8 // NIV: "the five sons of Saul’s daughter Merab." // KJV: "the five sons of Michal the daughter of Saul." // 2 Chronicles 22:2 // NIV: "Ahaziah was twenty-two years old." // KJV: "Ahaziah was forty-two years old." // Psalm 145:13 // KJV: "Thy kingdom is an everlasting kingdom..." // NIV: "Your kingdom is an everlasting kingdom... The Lord is trustworthy in all he promises..." // Deuteronomy 32:8 // KJV: "...according to the number of the children of Israel." // ESV: "...according to the number of the sons of God."

brother remove the intro please :)

@Asphyx1ator

5 күн бұрын

@@mohdfahad2219 No its a banger wym 😤🤑

Al-Kāfi - Volume 8, Book 1 chapter 55 *The earth is on a Whale and horns of a Bull* (Authentic) by Allamah Baqir al-Majlisi in Mirʾāt al-ʿUqūl fī Sharḥ Akhbār Āl al-Rasūl (15/201)

@servantofgod3058

6 күн бұрын

metaphorical

@flansable

5 күн бұрын

Not one Hadith in that book can be accurately verified to be the direct words of the prophet or any of the 11 imams

@Soldier-Of-Mahdi

5 күн бұрын

Do you know urdu/hindi brother, there is a video i can share regarding this

@mysticrustacean4065

5 күн бұрын

مُحَمَّدٌ عَنْ أَحْمَدَ عَنِ ابْنِ مَحْبُوبٍ عَنْ جَمِيلِ بْنِ صَالِحٍ عَنْ أَبَانِ بْنِ تَغْلِبَ عَنْ أَبِي عَبْدِ اللَّهِ (عليه السلام) قَالَ سَأَلْتُهُ عَنِ الْأَرْضِ عَلَى أَيِّ شَيْ‏ءٍ هِيَ قَالَ هِيَ عَلَى حُوتٍ قُلْتُ فَالْحُوتُ عَلَى أَيِّ شَيْ‏ءٍ هُوَ قَالَ عَلَى الْمَاءِ قُلْتُ فَالْمَاءُ عَلَى أَيِّ شَيْ‏ءٍ هُوَ قَالَ عَلَى صَخْرَةٍ قُلْتُ فَعَلَى أَيِّ شَيْ‏ءٍ الصَّخْرَةُ قَالَ عَلَى قَرْنِ ثَوْرٍ أَمْلَسَ قُلْتُ فَعَلَى أَيِّ شَيْ‏ءٍ الثَّوْرُ قَالَ عَلَى الثَّرَى قُلْتُ فَعَلَى أَيِّ شَيْ‏ءٍ الثَّرَى فَقَالَ هَيْهَاتَ عِنْدَ ذَلِكَ ضَلَّ عِلْمُ الْعُلَمَاءِ . 55. Muhammad, from Ahmad, from Ibn Mahboub, from Jameel Bin Saleh, from Aban Bin Tabligh has narrated the following: Abu Abdullah (asws) said, ‘I asked him (asws) about the earth, which thing does it rest upon? He (asws) said: ‘It is upon the whale’. I said, ‘So the whale, which thing does it rest upon?’ He (asws) said: ‘Upon the water’. I said, ‘So the water, upon which thing does is rest upon?’ He (asws) said: ‘Upon a rock’. I said, ‘So upon which thing does the rock rest upon?’ He (asws) said: ‘Upon the horns of a bull’ I said, ‘So upon which thing does the bull rest upon?’ He (asws) said: ‘Upon the mist’. I said, ‘So upon which thing does the mist rest upon?’ He (asws) said: ‘This is how far knowledge of scholars is permitted (to reveal) and beyond this is straying’. Al-Kāfi - Volume 8, The hadith of ‘on what is the whale’, Hadith #1 thaqalayn.net/hadith/8/1/55/1

@assassinwithalqalam

5 күн бұрын

That's a story by Jews, you'll find many traces of Jewish beliefs there. Another example is the so called Harooni. None of that is of value

Calling us rawafidha is crazy!😂

@flansable

5 күн бұрын

Imam Ja’far called you people that.

@mussabholloway

5 күн бұрын

@wickedgamer1745 Stop disputing the natural history of normative Islam then. Let it go.

@wickedgamer1745

5 күн бұрын

@@flansableright… the Imam (a.s) would call his own dear followers such words… 😂! You don’t know the character of the imams/Ahlul Bayt! They would never stoop so low like the likes of Yazeed to speak so badly of people. This word is and has always been used by the Wahabbi and the family of Saud in reference to us Shias just to misguide people away from us by instilling an inner hatred for us, and it is meant to humiliate us Shias and make us leave the truth that we have earned by the will of god, but Alhamdullilah we would never stray away from the path of the God, His Holy Words, The Prophet (SAW) and the Masoumeen and Imams after him! No matter how much you hate us, we will never leave the truth! As the prophet states : Ali is the truth and the truth is with Ali! So proudly I wish to, by the permission of god, be resurrected in the day of judgment among imam Ali (as) and the other masoumeen! Anyways I want to clear anything that makes any Ahl Sunnah think I have hatred for them! I apologize for any misunderstanding, or any perceived hate or harm! I absolutely do not want to cause any division among us Muslims! Especially at a time where our brothers, who are true representatives of the religion, fight for this pleasure of god and face persecution in Palestine! Free Palestine 🇵🇸!

@wickedgamer1745

5 күн бұрын

What? I seem to not understand the question very well. If by the natural history of normative Islam, you mean the things people may generally believe about the history of the religion which are false like the supposed good, sinless character of Yazeed and others (who shall remain unnamed), as mentioned by Farid in this video, then we are glad to go against such beliefs! We measure the truth not by people, but rather we measure the people by the truth! History shows again and again, with outmost clarity, in the ahadiths, the evil nature of Yazeed and others! Ask yourself, right after the demise of the prophet and even during his last few moments, why did people disobey the prophet so much as to listen his most simple of commands!? Why after his death, instead of supporting his family, people would suppress and oppress them, to the point that as you see the blood of the grandson of the prophet has been spelt, by Yazeed, a CALIPH of the time. There had been many COUNTLESS oppressions before and later on towards the ahl Bayt, but this is most clear of all! Yet, some still, guise themselves in the cloth of stupidity and ignorance so much so that they reject the bad behavior, and HORRID CHARACTER of Yazeed!!! Subhanallah, is there a worse crime than oppressing and killing the holy family members of the Prophet especially when they are vulnerable during the death of the prophet?! They would never dare look wrong towards the ahl Bayt during the blessed life of the prophet, but their hypocrisy eventually came and they showed the true hatred they had in them For the Family of Muhammad and the descendants of Ali!!! Alhamdullilah that the truth has been exposed, though it may have been dirtied by impure lies by those who wished to force the truth in their favor, god has made it clear for us between falsehood and the truth! If anyone is disrupting anything, it’s the likes of Yazeed who dirty the truth with lies to cover their disposable actions! But without a doubt those who TRULY FOLLOW AND LOVE, the prophet and ahl Bayt will never succumb to the pressures of people who wish to misguide us and take away our god given truth! As your brother in Islam, I apologize for anything rude or offensive I may have said! I do not wish to cause any division among us, but rather speak to you of the truth and falsehood and to open your mind and your heart to maybe accept it! I have one question for you, WHY do we NOT KNOW the burial site of the Prophet’s Daughter???!!! Think of it and research, inshallah, those who wish to find the truth, will surely find it! Assalamun Aleykum!

@flansable

5 күн бұрын

@@wickedgamer1745 She's buried in Al Baqi' in Madinah with all the other Sahaba. Follow your own advice and do some research on the books you claim are true. You wont find many authentic hadith in them.