I'm confused. Trace said the hole was largest in 2015 yet its been decreasing since the year 2000? What do i believe?

@kyleschneider9008

7 жыл бұрын

It was larger 2015 only because of a volcanic activity spike. It fixed again fairly quickly for now.

@storcutt72

7 жыл бұрын

AAAhhhAAAhhhAbullshitchoooo. Sorry, I had to sneeze.

@Laceykat66

7 жыл бұрын

Though we don't like to talk about that becasue you cannot blame volcanos on the "1%" we like to blame for everything. That is also why we cannot talk about how much CO2 is emitted by volcanoes. It does not fit the nanny state narrative.

@Eneix_

7 жыл бұрын

It was a bigger hole but not as weak

@TheCaptainSplatter

7 жыл бұрын

Keep illegal volcanic demons out.

How much duct tape did they use to fix it?

@GameSoft685

7 жыл бұрын

kontde ur wrong they used glue

@connortierney5665

7 жыл бұрын

about 2 rools

@zacharyrampelt2485

6 жыл бұрын

Dysfunctional Bat AHEM! it's actually Harambe's finest...

@kuldipsingh1729

6 жыл бұрын

HI friend

@grizzlymanverneteil4443

6 жыл бұрын

3 duct tape.

Before Ozone: Hey can we go on land? *No* Why? *The sun is a deadly laser* Oh *Not anymore there’s a blanket :D* (Ozone)

@gloriousraven7210

5 жыл бұрын

I see you've watched the history of the world to

@duckosaur865

4 жыл бұрын

Same here

They filled it up with hopes and dreams.

@ironmantis25

4 жыл бұрын

They filled it up with thoughts and prayers every time a mass shooting occurs.

@PlasmaBurns

4 жыл бұрын

@@ironmantis25 Here's a fact most people will never be able to understand. - Mass Shootings only happen in Gun Free Zones - For Officer Safety.

so why doesn't the good news ever go mainstream? why only the bad stuff about all the depressing destruction?

@SamWilson

7 жыл бұрын

because it sells

@Muuip

7 жыл бұрын

Cory Louis That is so true. We need news on the positive realised, and positive realisable, to help motivate and focus our collective creativity.

@GrapeFlavoredAntifreeze

7 жыл бұрын

Cory Louis Because that means people stop investing in the liberal agenda, and they really don't want to lose power.

@tfsfan1681

7 жыл бұрын

Cory Louis I'd prefer people to focus on the stuff that needs to be fixed instead (i.e the depressing stuff) than to focus on something else.

@kommandanter1980

6 жыл бұрын

Because cultural marxism

LOL. That was one of the best DNews intros yet.

@Angie-ze6yx

7 жыл бұрын

yeah lol i rewatched like three times before i even watched the rest of the video lol

@RoZaxTheGreat

7 жыл бұрын

yeh well i rewatched it 4 times so fight me

@US395Official

7 жыл бұрын

I know

@trevorthinkstruthmatters3485

7 жыл бұрын

The Globe is a LIE. THE EARTH IS A BROAD PLANE NOT A SPINNING PLANET!!!! WAKE UP JUDGEMENT IS COMING!!!!

@randomname5585

7 жыл бұрын

nothing will surpass shirtless trace, NOTHING!!

Freon is heavier than air and does not rise. Those holes are around the poles where sunlight is not needed and remains dark 6mo out of the year. So freon is supposed to find a way to the poles and rise? Right? Dupont had lost it's patent, so anyone could make it, THAT is what this was all about. Money! Dupont the sole distributor made billions on a cheap, effective and safe substance. Now we pay 20X more and Dupont has new patents.

@SupraNaturalTT

5 жыл бұрын

These pseudo science channels always put out half truths. Thanks for putting this in as I thought the the exact same explanation you put forward. Its the damn magnetic field! I am surprised these millenial geniuses don't believe the earth is flat. They also really need to stop calling light a particle, it is not. Tons of papers writin about it.

@pinchewey7

5 жыл бұрын

@@SupraNaturalTT Whoah don't diss our whole generation for a few conspiracy nut fools lol

@jahbabyeon

5 жыл бұрын

SupraNaturalTT M8, light is a particle. Photons

@SupraNaturalTT

5 жыл бұрын

@@jahbabyeon Light is not a particle that is dualistic in nature. There is a ton of literature on this subject. Please check out theroria apophasis channel ie Ken Wheeler. He gives many many examples about this. Nicola Tesla, Walter Russel and many other geniuses talked about this in great detail. Ken Wheeler also has a free down load of his book 'Understanding the secrets of magnetism'. I am surprised this info isn't more mainstream, no this isn't a conspiracy just hardcore science. Keep in mind every time you see a new discovey about a new particle it will be followed by the term 'quantum' coined by Richard Feynman the god father of quantum mechanics. Quantum is just a pseudonym put in place for 'I don't know'. Just search the video 'Richard Feynman magnets' that aired on the BBC. The interviewer asks what should be a simple question to a quantum brain like him and he actually gets mad about the prospect of trying to explain something he knows nothing about. Please search these people I mentioned, I originally accepted the possibility of light being a particle and I no longer think that. I would be interested if you could get back to me with anything you have found 👍

@SupraNaturalTT

5 жыл бұрын

@@pinchewey7 Your're right kim and I do apologize for that, it's very frustrating to see this kind of science still being taught this way. I always tell people to search the work of Ken Wheeler but their are so many others out there.

I was born in a refrigerator FOR I AM SULPHUR DIOXIDE

@gachaboy842

6 жыл бұрын

Sulphur Dioxide hi!

@ebenclukey7293

6 жыл бұрын

I'm pink therefore I'm spam.

@hg2.

4 жыл бұрын

Look how we've been "had" by this "ozone depletion" scam: "In other words, CFCs probably have NOTHING to do with Antarctic ozone." kzread.info/dash/bejne/nnapldilpMbggto.html

@galaxya6406

3 жыл бұрын

@@hg2. They say after the montreal protocol where we stop using CFC

@hg2.

3 жыл бұрын

@@galaxya6406 ??? There's been no change in South pole ozone. We've been had by their cr*p.

Rayquaza would have fixed it way faster...

@sirpenguinthev

7 жыл бұрын

Lol

@Jeffrey314159

7 жыл бұрын

There never was a hole in the ozone layer, just an area of thinning which is due to natural cycles that we are only now beginning to perceive, just like climate change. ENVIRONMENTALISM HAS ALWAYS BEEN PROPELLED BY FEAR MONGERING AND BAD SCIENCE

@ParadoxOfFire

7 жыл бұрын

Jeffrey You my friend ,are right #FuckCurrentScientist

@griffithdidnothingwrong8779

7 жыл бұрын

Tatsusama you deserve my like😂

@tatsusama3192

7 жыл бұрын

DAT ASS Not only do I like your comment but also your picture. Seven Deadly Sins is great!

I'm so early that the hole in the ozone later is still here!

@chrisarmstrong3727

7 жыл бұрын

ayeee

@rurutuM

7 жыл бұрын

I want that kitty

@SG99_

7 жыл бұрын

but why is ur later broken?

@swampfox3536

7 жыл бұрын

layer ...it's *LAYER* JK

@tristanl7538

7 жыл бұрын

I like your shirt where can I get one

The Sun is a Deadly lazer

@Kumar-24

4 жыл бұрын

Human is deadly animal

@TGY21133

3 жыл бұрын

now anymore theres a blanket

@TGY21133

3 жыл бұрын

(that broke)

@thewardiam

3 жыл бұрын

I said it in the voice.

@brolookatthatthingbehindyo1324

3 жыл бұрын

when day breaks

"Breaks up Oxygen from O2 into O3..." - that could use some explaining. 3:10

@youtubered4402

6 жыл бұрын

Robert Oschler the oxygen (02) absorbs some of the uv rays and breaks down into singular oxygen and then those singular oxygens combine with the remaining 02 and form the ozone (03). That's what he meant that it breaks down 02 into 03

@robbxxi

6 жыл бұрын

Turn the 02 to the 03 gods plan

@hugomusic9504

6 жыл бұрын

Uv breaks up O2 into O which can later combine with O2 forming O3.

@jhk8396

6 жыл бұрын

O3 breaks down into O2 on contact with the sun's radiation or chlorine

@debendragurung3033

6 жыл бұрын

KZread Red yup that's what he meant.

That's a big hole

@mister_bros2087

7 жыл бұрын

That's what I said.

@willorr1614

7 жыл бұрын

For you.

@OldieBugger

7 жыл бұрын

Right, extremely hazardous to every sunbathing enthusiast in Antarctica...

@TheTCOLL

7 жыл бұрын

Not as big as Hillary's. Believe me!

@DGP406

7 жыл бұрын

No one cared about it until it put the hole on

finally, i can release this CFC fart ive been holding in since 1996.

@sansfano_ounder_talexd8290

7 жыл бұрын

Randall Lobo yikies

@heavyrain5949

6 жыл бұрын

Hmmm... Yikes!

@immaguy7905

6 жыл бұрын

Liam Divine zoinks

@pogmothoin1655

6 жыл бұрын

You can but under the Montreal protocol you will be liable to a £10,000 fine and five years in prison. You can fill the hillsides with bird blenders though that is considered environmentally friendly.

@stevedodge7025

6 жыл бұрын

You better get the Correct permits first. The Stuff is Still Banned. And We all have to admit. This Ban was not only a good thing to do. But. It was the right thing to do.And! And it worked. Perfectly.

Thank you. I remembered the ole ozone layer today. My kids have prob never heard of it. Lol

Thank God for that news... Now I can have an added wink of blissful sleep.

It was my favorite hole...

@catsexual3412

7 жыл бұрын

Get a gf. And you will find some new favorite holes.

@alexandert696

7 жыл бұрын

Catsexual I need something more spacious.

@gangstashanksta

7 жыл бұрын

lomafhhaa!

@taipeikartman

7 жыл бұрын

Like a glory hole.

@posadist681

7 жыл бұрын

Try blackholes

nobody is worried about hydrochloric acid raining from the sky.

@davidbeauchemin1840

7 жыл бұрын

Yeah, but its better than loosing the ozone layer.

@108wee

7 жыл бұрын

No one cares because it's on Antarctica, if it did reach human's then it would be so diffused it would do any harm, well not anymore harm then acid rain does.

@TerraeChannel

7 жыл бұрын

What do you prefer? Having you skin burned by acid rains or by UV light? :D

@VistaManiac93

7 жыл бұрын

at least you can shelter yourself from acid rains. Thats what indoors and umbrellas are for?

@carlaspinwall4247

6 жыл бұрын

HYDRA Studios depends on the acid and the material your using to stop it. If it's an Alien bleeding out above you then you are fooked

CONTINUED (2): So this is what the supposed "hole" in the Ozone Layer is: For years scientists took several measurements on the atmosphere. They concentrated on pole poles. At the poles, the Sun will stay below the horizon for months, & also will stay above the horizon for months. This directly influences the average (key word: average) amount of Ozone in the Troposphere. Earth has negative feedback systems engineered in nature to counteract things as circumstances change. One of which is the average concentration of Ozone over the poles. When the Sun stays above the horizon for several months, the average Ozone concentration will increase to counteract the increased exposed to UV radiation. The inverse is true when the Sun stays below the horizon for months...the average Ozone concentration will decrease because that area of Earth is not being exposed to UV radiation. Other things also influence the average Ozone concentration, such as the Sun's weather (ie Solar Storms that release CMEs) So science academia purposely decided to measure average Ozone concentration levels over both the North & South poles when the Sun was below the horizon for months....when the average Ozone concentration would be low. They did this for years. Now average Ozone concentration is all over the map elsewhere on Earth for many reasons. So of which are: The Sun rises above & sets below the horizon everyday throughout the year at lower latitudes. Electrical storms create Ozone. & lightning discharges all over the Earth several times a second, 24/7. Electrical discharges create Ozone. With the exception of diesel engines, spark plugs in gasoline engines create Ozone. Over populated areas with gasoline engines spew Ozone round the clock. Yes, this Ozone typically wont get in the upper Troposphere, but It does influence Earth's natural cycles & the atmosphere in general. These are just a few reasons why average Ozone concentration levels are all over the map throughout the globe below the North pole & above the South pole. There are many more reasons. Ok, so science academia purposely gets the low Ozone concentration averages over the poles; that they are wanting to get. Then they take averages throughout the test of the globe. Then they compare the averages over the poles, to the averages throughout the rest of the globe. So of course the contrast of averages are going to persuade you to believe that there is/are an anomaly(ies) over 1 or both poles. The data was collected in a way so that it persuades you to believe what they want you to believe. It would be like me showing you on a chalk board that 2 + 2 = 4, but I present to you the total in a clever way to try to persuade you that the number 4 is bad. Have I lied about the math?...No. The data is the data. The math is correct. But its the way I am presenting it that involves my deceit. Now science academia purposefully coined the phrase "hole in the Ozone Layer" to mislead the public. Science academia knows that you can't have a hole in a fluid of gases, because the surrounding pressure will immediately fill the so called "hole" with more of the surrounding gases. But they purposely chose the misnomer of "hole" to cause concern & panick. Think of it like this: Let's say you paint a wall in your house. For whatever reason, after the paint dries I come along & start taking a measurement of the average thickness of paint in each 1 foot square section of the wall. & I find that a the average thickness of the coating of paint in a few square foot sections are about one 10 thousanth of an inch less, in contrast to all the other 1 foot square averages of the rest of the wall. I come to you & say, "You have a hole in your wall!" & I show you a color coded map of the contrasting averages throughout the 1 foot square sections of the wall. The area of the so called "hole" is a red color, & the rest of the wall's averages all fall in the blue range. I point to the red area & say to you, "Right there! That's the hole in your wall. This is the data. The math is correct. If you deny there is a hole in you're wall, then YOU are a science denier & YOU are irresponsible & part of the problem!" -This is EXACTLY what is going on with the lie about the supposed "Hole in the Ozone Layer". As you can clearly see, its cooked up. Its deception. I'll discuss WHY the public has been told this lie in my next post. TO BE CONTINUED AGAIN...

The whole concept of CFC depleting the ozone layer doesn't make any sense. Air, like any other substance in the universe,is bound by the principles of gravity. So heavier air always descends down tothe surface while lighter gases rise up to the top. Lighter = less denselypacked low molecular weight gases (ex: Helium - ever seen helium balloons fly?) If this is so then how does CFC, a molecule that weight 43.0198 g/mol get into the stratosphere. It just doesn't add up.

@fleecemaster

6 жыл бұрын

Brownian motion and mass transport through weather systems. We're also talking about a very small percentage of the CFCs making their way into the stratosphere. With the huge amount that was being used during the time there was a lot available in the atmosphere to be taken up. If the atmosphere was not a dynamic system with large amounts of turbulence then you would be quite correct. I suppose a good example to think about if you need a physical thing to think it through would be shaking a snow globe, or shaking one of those oil/water toys.

We have the ability to create ozone in multiple ways. Why not do that and speed up the process of repairing the hole?

@KohuGaly

7 жыл бұрын

because ozone is heavier than air - if you make it near the surface it stays there and causes trouble (it's toxic). If you try to transport it to to stratosphere, it will just fall down if you release it too fast. It is just not economically viable to artificially rebuild ozone layer.

@kingkeeper99

7 жыл бұрын

wut!? and how does normal-naturally created ozone stays up there? does it falls with time?

@KohuGaly

7 жыл бұрын

KingKeeper99 It is extremely diluted in normal air (10 pars per million) so the force of gravity is overwhelmed by brownian motion. Similar to how clouds are capable of staying up even though they are made of tiny ice-crystals, which are much heavier and denser than air molecules.

@kingkeeper99

7 жыл бұрын

KohuGaly ohhh cool, thanks for answering me!! now it makes sense.

@Hangar-zu8xg

7 жыл бұрын

TIL

Why did the hole in the Ozone form over the Antarctic and not in the Northern Hemisphere where there are more industrial countries that would have used CFCs?

@TiagoTiagoT

7 жыл бұрын

I think it has something to do with wind patterns, not sure.

@fwengsolutions

7 жыл бұрын

I think what V is trying to say is that there are fewer large areas of vegetation in the southern hemisphere to produce ozone.

@aldionsylkaj9654

7 жыл бұрын

Because the earth is flat and they don't want people venturing there.

@ACoroa

7 жыл бұрын

It has something to do with the temperature. O3 is easier to break up in colder temperatures. The best mix of CFCs and cold is there.

@frozeneternity93

7 жыл бұрын

***** Yea I think it must be a lot of factors

How can it decrease from the year 2000 but be at its largest recorded size in 2015? Plus didn't they find out that planes were causing a fare greater problem to the ozone than CFCs were? If so how has it decreased in size as neither national or international flights have been stemmed.

@undeadminion811

6 жыл бұрын

kzread.info/dash/bejne/ZYatwcV6c6e9qbw.html

@sawme8030

6 жыл бұрын

Wow!! I❣the way you think !!☺

@stevedodge7025

6 жыл бұрын

Volcanos. A bunch of 'em.

@primeminer

6 жыл бұрын

You maje some good points. the ozone "hole" was proven to only exist 3 months a year, over a decade ago. Why would the hole only exist 3 months out of the year? Cfcs are to heavy to float up to the ozone layer by themselves. However, 3 months out of the year, fantastic winds are powerful enough to push the cfcs up to the ozone layer. Natural chlorine cannot survive the trip up to the ozone layer, but cfcs can because they are much more durable. So, outside of those three months of the year, the ozone hole is non existent. This theory makes the most sense, especially when you consider that the ozone hole is only above the antarctic. Without the arctic winds, cfcs would not be able to reach the ozone layer. Even if they could reach the ozone layer without antarctic winds, there would not be much of an impact because the cfcs would evenly distrbut le throughout the ozone layer. The removal of cfcs was a good move, because as more cfcs were produced, less and less ozone would be in the ozone "hole" for 3 months out of the year. However, America rushed the ban of cfcs, causing a lack of good refrigeration for a period of time. In 3rd world country's, slot of food spoiled because of this lack of refrigeration, causing loss of life.

@appleappington7346

6 жыл бұрын

PrimeMiner well to be fair people weren't sure back then all they knew was that it was thinking and fast besides who knows if we didn't do anything maybe more than a couple million people would have died

I feel so warm and fuzzy right now. Just knowing that somehow the ozone layer is getting better just made my Friday the 13th glow with happiness. In fact I am going to share this with my FB friends and maybe, just maybe, brighten their day too. Thank you Seeker!!!

One might say our society needed the "hole" truth.... eeeeyyy

@grizzlymanverneteil4443

6 жыл бұрын

Good anal gaping joke.

@PrinceSwaggy

6 жыл бұрын

lambmaster I get it

@nightslasher9384

6 жыл бұрын

Truth is like a big penis; once it forces itself in you, you're would never forget it.

Dude in Virginia it's 80 degrees Fahrenheit and it's September... it's legit usually 60 degrees right now, some shit is happening

@johnjohnson3457

7 жыл бұрын

dude, in Houston right now it's 5 degrees below average that means nothing is happening.

@johnjohnson3457

7 жыл бұрын

it's called a heatwave, and that's not even how global warming is proposed to work. You are caught up in apocalyptic hysteria. calm the fuck down.

@Tmanstomp100

7 жыл бұрын

Stephan Phillips Bitch why would a heatwave happen in the fucking fall time on the east coast? You're dumb as shit

@johnjohnson3457

7 жыл бұрын

you do understand what a heatwave is, right? you know a heatwave can come in winter, right? of course not.

@johnjohnson3457

7 жыл бұрын

also, 80 is well within the average range.

Hello from New Zealand, Thank you America for that hole in our Ozone layer. Those atomic tests were fully worth it!

@Chris68558

3 жыл бұрын

United States, Operation Fishbowl

Before 1963, us government was testing nukes in the upper atmosphere and space.

@youtubeaccount8056

5 жыл бұрын

77thekey glad someone mentioned that!! what results came of that?!

@itsnotaboutthemoneyitsabou6759

5 жыл бұрын

Not good ones lmao

@diggLincoln

5 жыл бұрын

Operation fish bowl

@aussieopalgirl2915

5 жыл бұрын

Yes and that has destroyed parts of the ozone layer Pretty sure it was like that.they did a lot of testing also in the Pacific ocean. The hole in Ozone layer was manmade through nuke bombing tests.

@captiveexile2670

5 жыл бұрын

Yeah, the tail always seems top "wag the dog" and our D.C. government is now setting the stage for a NUCLEAR WW3 (read Isaiah 33:8-10 and see for yourself: (Michael Cohen for Secretary of Defense against rampant porn queens). No SHIT.

there was actually never a "hole" in the ozone. they are extremely thin spots which allow for more uv radiation throught.... so basically a hole but not actually a hole.

@prairledoggedrez4758

6 жыл бұрын

And also the 'thin spot' was recorded in 1957 or thereabouts before CFC's were in widespread use...it's another big business con.

@Kidandas

6 жыл бұрын

Your a hole 😛

@b.bailey8244

6 жыл бұрын

Geo-engineering has been going on for over 75 years, which shoots your theory all to hell.

@galaxya6406

3 жыл бұрын

@@prairledoggedrez4758 He say in the video they invented CFC in 1928 and 1977 was the time they realized about the ozone hole

@prairledoggedrez4758

3 жыл бұрын

@@galaxya6406 I said in widespread use 90% of released CFC's were from aerosol sprays...not widely used until the 60's on a large scale and refrigerators were not that numerous either.

Is trace the only host now?

@seabb

7 жыл бұрын

Right? Like, where the heck are the other hosts?

@JennaKayce

7 жыл бұрын

it's cool i like trace the best anyway

@canstermeat8171

7 жыл бұрын

+Tixij ikr Trace is the D

@JennaKayce

7 жыл бұрын

Canster Meat D?

@gayar4596

7 жыл бұрын

everyone else vanished, with out a Trace....

I appreciate you explaining that photonic energy breaks apart the freon first and those dissociated Cl ions are then free to rise where they interact with O3. The common argument against this is that freon is to heavy to get the stratosphere. They don't understand the sequence. Thanks again!

Man i remember hearing about this all the time when I was younger. I always wondered what was really going on, if it was BS. I didn't know how the cfc's broke down, r-12 refrigerant, etc... I'm so glad they stopped making it such a debacle and now things are looking up..

I wonder, did cancer peak when the ozone hole was at its biggest?

@OGSinisterPotato

7 жыл бұрын

Interesting question..

@eric2ill4u

7 жыл бұрын

Thank you!

@mikiemike20042002

7 жыл бұрын

If you lived in Antarctica where the hole is located.

@saylolcool

7 жыл бұрын

yes I live in new Zealand and we have some of the highest percentages of skin cancerin the world due to being so close to the ozone layer.

@eric2ill4u

7 жыл бұрын

And cuz all the white people. I see

Hey Trace, you folks at DNews do great work. I share your videos with my 10yr old all the time. Thank you for the lil bits of science education.

thanks for telling me about ozone layer information.

the holes in the ozone actually disappeared in the nineties the amount of ozone was found to always have been in a state of flux ,holes or thinning occuring then reversing .

@jamesl7205

6 жыл бұрын

Tobe Jonsson Like I who's the scientist said (fart), yes its that fart that closed open and closed it... It will be a shame if this news got out

@marvinedwards4282

5 жыл бұрын

A prime example of how large corp's LOVE regulation, and use the ignorance of the left, and the heavy boot of the government to eliminate competition. Funny, once DuPont secured the monopoly on refrigerant all coverage of the ozone hole disappeared.

One day,Scientists will work on getting humans to fart out Oxygen...For others to breath..

@theforestero

7 жыл бұрын

By putting #LungAlgae,and *Gut Bacteria* into the populations ofcertain peoples....The Lungus and BaGut will produce Air..

@jamesl7205

6 жыл бұрын

Gemeral dis Sure those scientist got paid by the Global Banker Eltes, shadow government agents... They are full of pretty much lots of bulls

@the_weeb_lord1017

6 жыл бұрын

Gemeral dis That’s what plants are for. We breathe CO2 and which they inhale, then they exhale some Os for us to breathe

@thatxonexguy5438

6 жыл бұрын

Well we already turn pee into drinkable water so maybe they will

@highlandsprings5752

6 жыл бұрын

I think we call that politics

I remember this being a huge problem when I was a kid. Knowing the ozone can heal itself is pretty amazing. All we need to focus on now is global warming and see what we can eliminate to get temperatures back to normal, if possible.

@inseditsChannel

2 жыл бұрын

if possible..

@afatrandomrat2234

2 жыл бұрын

Fix it again

Do they check new chemical concoctions to determine if they're destructive to O3 before approving them for mass manufacture?

The hole is still there and getting bigger according to NASA. It was 10 million square miles last time I checked. Not sure where they got their info about it getting smaller.

@notmanynamesleft

5 жыл бұрын

Pro Tech well it’s common knowledge that NASA is one big money-making scam corporation so maybe they will keep trying to feed the sheep bullshit.

thank you for making this video.

if we can reduce CFC usage as recommended by scientists I'm not sure why it's even a debate why we should reduce Carbon emissions (which is also recommended by the scientific community).

@timonix2

7 жыл бұрын

more money involved. CFC's were big, but not the entire oil and coal industry big.

@wmpratt2010

7 жыл бұрын

CFCs were not a big deal and were on there way out when the ban went into effect.The "hole" was/is likely a result of the largest areas with no oxygen being emitted by plants. In contrast the man-made AGW through carbon emissions are not scientifically sound. Given the stagnant air temperature change we've seen in the last 18 years, no change to carbon policy is required.

@keithdurant4570

7 жыл бұрын

Air temperature is not the only indicator of temperature rise. The ocean's are also warming. Interesting how you picked the one year from the 1990's that is tied with 2002 as one of the top ten hottest as your benchmark. Yes there has only been a .23C rise if you use 1998. How about we use 1996 or 1999. The difference between them and 2015 respectively is .52C and .44C

@wmpratt2010

7 жыл бұрын

Keith Durant So your entire rebuttal is built on one half of a degree Celsius? An obvious margin of error. Call me when it actually warms.

@keithdurant4570

7 жыл бұрын

wmpratt2010 No it is not a margin of error. It is one half degree in less than 20 years. So another 80 years gives us another 2C. Climate scientists do not predict 10 year trends they predict 100 year trends. And so far they are bang on!

Awesome video you clearly explained those chemistry Thanks

I always found it interesting that the 2000+ nuclear weapons tests were never associated with the "ozone hole".

1:50 It's cool to hear the actual chemistry behind ozone destruction. I knew that ozone was O3, but never heard how CFCs were responsible for it's depletion.

@saltburner2

9 ай бұрын

Although CFC aerosols were banned in the West, there is probably more CFC going into the atmosphere now than before. When will they ever learn that correlation is not causation.

man... I'm brazilian and I'm not that okay about listening in english but your pronounce is so good that I understand 80% of everything you said 👍

@missmagnificent8895

7 жыл бұрын

Put on subtitle it'll help too

@DKong100

7 жыл бұрын

it's better to learn chinese than it is english more people speak chinese than they do english

@helifalic

7 жыл бұрын

+Kong Moua -> Lol a whole damn lot of those Chinese speaking people are peasants living in the 3rd world though, not much value in learning their language. English is the language spoken by the most prosperous and powerful countries in the world, much more valuable to know. The free market is testament to this as English dominates global business communications.

@PazLeBon

7 жыл бұрын

its american english not english

@lutu1408

7 жыл бұрын

As a testament of you argument, most of the major Swedish companies like Spotify, Skype and other technological giants have established English as the official language of companies, further proving that the influences of foreign culture is a major part of the forming of Swedish culture.

i hate documentaries, but this was interesting since i never heard back from this issue. Thanks for the excellent explanation, i like details in issues, the (what, where, when and how). Thank you

You seriously need to sponsor wherever you get your t-shirts from. They’re always so awesome!!! 🤩

This guy is my favorite character on Big Bang Theory

To those people who think we can't do anything to stop global warming, i gesture frantically at this video to them.

@rocketraccoon1976

7 жыл бұрын

They won't listen. It's a good thing we addressed the ozone hole back then. If it had happened now, today's conservatives would have never believed it. There's no such thing as indisputable science in their eyes.

@DiscoStuIII

7 жыл бұрын

If all green house gas emissions from humans stopped, global warming would still be occuring, just not nearly as rapidly

@jomten

7 жыл бұрын

I am sympathetic to wanting to protect the planet, but without burning fossil fuels hundreds of millions will starve. The obama administration threw a bunch of money at solar panels with nothing to show for it, so it's not like we haven't tried. Fossil fuels are not going to be around forever, if anyone can show that we will destroy the planet BEFORE we run out of fossil fuels, I would support it more. But no one knows how much fossil fuels are left, let alone what earth will be like at the end.

@synktrain

7 жыл бұрын

Me thinks if we might be able to kill two burns w/ 1 stone. We could use the stone (billions and billions of dollars, not ideal, I know) and find alternate energy sources that are renewable like gravity and sunlight or something else. I think that this is one of America's biggest problems atm. Gravity is the only limitless energy source that I know of.

@k1productions87

7 жыл бұрын

That is the whole problem. Everyone expects instant results, instant gratification, and if a problem is not 100% solved in the short term, then why bother even trying? And when you mention something will take 50-100 years, they say "that won't affect me, so why should I care?" ... this is why such people shouldn't be allowed to breed, because not only would their idiocy be a toxic influence upon their children and grandchildren,... but they willingly and purposefully ensure suffering of these same children and grandchildren in the future. "Do you want your grandchildren growing up in a world where they would have to wear oxygen masks to breathe, and extreme SPF sunblock to walk across the street?" "I don't care, it doesn't involve me" DENIED!!!!

I'm so happy mother earth is repairing. I seriously feel so good and satisfied right now and little bit tension free.

@advvaibhavvashisht9399

6 жыл бұрын

SDD525 atleast in some terms.

How do you get freon/cfc weighing 3x times as much as atm.air up in +15km height??

The hole has been closed for a while now, you're a tad bit late

Ya. Studies are showing our efforts to save the planet are paying off.

Thank you everyone at D NEWS for this

The Earth is resilient.

@lobotimized7596

6 жыл бұрын

Dispel Illusions. Very true but humans aren't..kinda like frogs...

Ozone is a gas, it doesn't get a hole, it thins out from time to time in certain areas.

@kyleschneider9008

7 жыл бұрын

For short, we started to throw around the word "Hole" to describe it in a simple way. We know it's not a literal hole, it's named that for the sake of simplicity.

@tanker9987

7 жыл бұрын

Remember that the majority of people (voters) only received a government regulated public education.

@Counselor77

7 жыл бұрын

You got that right !

Dude, I love this KZread series and shouts out to the commentator

Even though the whole is closing,,how’s the overall thickness of the ozone layer,,very important,,

Woo we're gonna live hell yea

@MrDogonjon

7 жыл бұрын

'Cept dat... we didn't learn the lesson from ozone that big companies put their own short term profits ahead of the long term health of people and the planet. So it's the same old shit just a new molecule and a much greater risk. The denial is the same and surly the climate deniers will point to ozone and say "see, it's not an issue" but it is an issue and if we don't change our energy policy we will be sweating under water.

@tiernanodoherty1682

7 жыл бұрын

Jon Jacoby o un hell yea

@Rnune-zx7si

7 жыл бұрын

when i read that that whoo hell yea just seemed so fake lol

@chimedemon

6 жыл бұрын

Nope! In fact we’re probably going to go extinct... within the 2000’s to 2100

@personperson9794

6 жыл бұрын

NiD0 Ravensbeard by us nuking ourselves*

let me think of a joke what type of car does Yoda drive a toyoda mmmmmfunny joke

@fredrikkarner4115

7 жыл бұрын

that is sad very sad

@eliogarcia6142

7 жыл бұрын

+Fede Widder your mom

@gryphy69420

7 жыл бұрын

honda civic

@DaffyDaffyDaffy33322

7 жыл бұрын

Game grumps :)

@Master_Therion

7 жыл бұрын

When I was a kid I had a Toy Luke Skywalker, but not a Toy Yoda.

It's quite convenient that ozon layer is there in the first place.

Thanks, i feel relieved👀

You mean DuPont didnt want the world to be destroyed? Gee You think that would be bad for business?

Hurray for the ppl who believed the ozone hole

@jamesl7205

6 жыл бұрын

sirin hamza yeah I see through the bulls... Shouldnt we have stay cattles forever and eat the poisons...?!

I understand the hole pretty well thank you very much!

Reminds me of an old can of Off bug spray I found in an abandoned house once. It used CFC's, but my god was it some of the most effective bug spray I ever used. Was a bit sad when the can ran out

Does lightning convert O2 into O3 ?

@menacetosociety9076

7 жыл бұрын

are u talking about electrolysis?

@schizophrenicenthusiast

7 жыл бұрын

Autumnal Vernal I'm not sure, all I heard was that O2 molecules combine into O3 when in 'contact' with lightning bolts, but I'm not really sure about it, but I couldn't find that information anywhere on the internet.

@bobweiss8682

7 жыл бұрын

Yes, as does intense UV light in the upper atmosphere. Ozone is responsible for that "electrical" smell in the air after a thunderstorm....

@richb313

7 жыл бұрын

That is actually part of the natural ozone cycle. Most ozone is produced in the upper atmosphere where solar and to some extent cosmic radiation provides the energy needed to produce ozone.

@schizophrenicenthusiast

7 жыл бұрын

Thank you for the response :)

there is still a hole above new Zealand

@lwmarkgraal

6 жыл бұрын

Asher b who cares bout new zealand?

@shadow_sprite1006

6 жыл бұрын

LwMark 561 the people who live their dumbass

@kanishlal14

6 жыл бұрын

LwMark 561 fam 4m people live in new Zealand

@benjaminf

6 жыл бұрын

Asher b get the duct tape then

@MooshieGaming

6 жыл бұрын

LwMark 561 Who cares bout you?

I'm happy to see the Ozone is coming back slowly, but surely.

The internet is freaking me out lol.. I was just thinking about "what happened to the ozone layer?" But never asked/said anything to anyone!! 🤔🤔😅😅

What I've never understood is _how_ the depletion of the ozone layer has made a hole in it rather than just making it thinner all around.

@cpufreak101

7 жыл бұрын

CoolDudeClem from another comment thread, I believe they figured it out to be most global wind currents meet in Antarctica, making it have the biggest concentration

nasa lol

Awesome channel!!!

Well I’ll never get that 4 1/2 minutes back, thanks for that.

Someone forgot to tell this guy global warming is done. The new holy word is climate change

@hopeg97

7 жыл бұрын

Both phrases are completely acceptable. The was a time when some of the models were predicting extreme cooling, so we started calling it climate change. Given that global average temperatures are continuing to climb at an unprecedented rate, global warming is an acceptable term.

@hopeg97

7 жыл бұрын

Also, what do you mean by "holy word". Science is not a belief system. I should know: I am a physics student at my university, and I also adhere to a religion (Christianity). For me, the two have nothing to do with each other. Science is not a belief system. Mind-boggling amounts of evidence, from a variety of scientific disciplines, have shown with >95℅ certainty that it's happening and >90% certainty that greenhouse gas emissions from human activity is causing it. Some people say that because it's not 100℅, that the science isn't there, but the odds are worse than playing Russian roulette with 5 loaded chambers in a six-shooter.

@davidbeauchemin1840

7 жыл бұрын

+Darkfox Bill In lamen's term Global warming melts Ice, Ice fucks up marine currents. Heat distrubution is fucked up climate changes. Both are linked.

@hopeg97

7 жыл бұрын

Josh Ruzicka Please don't be hostile: You catch more flies with honey than you do with vinegar. Metaphorically, not literally. Actual flies prefer vinegar (I've heard balsamic works best), and honey causes them to choke.

@shaneg9081

7 жыл бұрын

Take a science class, please

I mentioned this in one of my stand-up comedy acts. "The hole in the ozone layer will kill us all! Never mind, we're bored with that now, but global warming!"

@Chronically_ChiII

7 жыл бұрын

It wont kill us because we went out of our way to fix it. It's not hard to understand

@rocketraccoon1976

7 жыл бұрын

+Cubed To conservatives, it is.

@justlifechillvibes7212

7 жыл бұрын

Your joke implies that we deal with environmental issues cause we're bored and they don't really matter. Am I the only one interpreting it like this?

@ShawnRavenfire

7 жыл бұрын

Jonas Gabriel Tysk I meant that we STOP dealing with things that really DO matter because we get bored with them.

@ShawnRavenfire

7 жыл бұрын

Cubed But we didn't go out of our way to fix it. The media just stopped talking about it, and while no one was looking, a few environmental regulatory agencies made a few minor policy changes, which over time, made a difference. "We" didn't do anything, and no one in the news media bothered to inform us that this was no longer a serious problem. Result: We were told about a big dangerous thing that we should all be scared of, and then we never heard about it again.

When referring to CFCs you showed a picture of refrigerant 410A. An HFC. Just to clarify.

As a child my Dad would use Carbontetracloride for cleaning tuners and electronic equipment.We didn't know any better then.We actually used many other things that were environmentally unsafe

of course it has nothing to do with Dupont having the patent expire just as that accord was signed , but then Dupont comes along to save us all with a new product to save the planet (Al Gore would be so thankful) .

How do you "know" it was primarily due to the Montreal accords.

@bryanbridges2987

6 жыл бұрын

Sean Haggard Yeah. I was wondering the same thing. I'm four months late, but still.

@RutraNickers

6 жыл бұрын

well let's see: in 1980 it was fine, then the CFC came, and in 1984 a fucking hole apeared that was getting bigger every year. Than we have the Montreal business, the time industries fought to continue producing CFC, then the time to substitute the gas in the production line and people buing new refrigerators and dumping the old ones. and then we saw, year after year, an stabilize in the hole an then it's diminution. So by 1+1 = 2, we can deduce that the production stop of CFC is directly correlated with the normalization of ozone in upper atmosfere just like we could deduce it is CFC the culprit ofr the hole in the first place

@ericredd7464

6 жыл бұрын

It's apparent you've been drinking Kool-Aid to even attempt to correct this line of thought.

@ryansylvester976

6 жыл бұрын

One of "laws of logic" i have been learning about in school is that if A happned before B, it does not prove that A caused B.

@davidhenriksson285

6 жыл бұрын

Cody131Coops But why did the ozone layer only thin near the poles?

I didn't know about this but it looks interesting to watch

It’s going down to -1* F in Philadelphia! Not only do I not believe the is warming up, but I don’t see why this would be a bad thing.

I live in new Zealand and its still there just saying

@aphroselenee

6 жыл бұрын

Hamish Feast can you see it?? XD

@hamishfeast9124

6 жыл бұрын

Nope we just get sunburn in like 7 minutes

@joshualuntsford

6 жыл бұрын

Hamish Feast sounds like a weak skin prob. Just kiddin

There's a question that's bugging me about the ozone hole. The ozone hole is over Antarctica. However, unless I miss my guess, CFC use would have been most concentrated in the developing world--which is mostly in the _Northern Hemisphere_. So, how did we conclude that the ozone hole was caused by human intervention and that it was not a natural phenomenon? Wouldn't CFC use in the Northern Hemisphere have instead caused a more generalized decrease in the ozone layer over the Northern Hemisphere?

@RossOwensMotionDesign

7 жыл бұрын

The reaction needs very cold conditions to take place. Even though there are more CFCs being released at lower latitudes, the ozone cant be broken apart easily where the air is warmer.

@bradleywangyang1071

7 жыл бұрын

I'm not a hundred percent sure but it's something about the temp. Don't quote me on that

@rickson50

7 жыл бұрын

Oxygen when mated with another molecule in an ionic bond takes on a negative charge. Oxygen mated with oxygen mated with oxygen is a whole lot of negative in one molecule. The magnetic sphere has it's negative pole in the south. Negatives attracts negative therefore attracting negative oxygen molecules. That is my thought process though I am not an expert...yet, I'm in university studying to be a scientist. Why isn't other molecules like water attracted to the south pole you ask? Well because in that hydrogen bond the Oxygen does indeed take on a negative charge, however, the two hydrogens take on positive charges, therefore canceling out the effect

@tadakuniyoshitake6399

7 жыл бұрын

It is because of wind circulation. All wind around the world[which carried CFC] will pass through Antarctica which will make the ozone layer in Antarctica more bigger than any other place.

@rickson50

7 жыл бұрын

tadakuni yoshitake How would that make the hole concentrated in Antarctica? It's a hole not an extra thick sheet of ozone.

I'm glad there are people to figure this out, because I am completely lost.

I attended a refrigeration program and CFC or the band for use so now the ozone layer was healed. .

The corporations fought against overwhelming scientific evidenice and LOST ... let's hope it's a trend.

@ZeHydra

6 жыл бұрын

You do realize corporations like DuPont (the largest CFC producing company) were at the forefront of finding replacements and funding this research right?

@freighttrain7143

6 жыл бұрын

Saying 'You Do Realize' doesn't influence grown ups, especially when you obviously didn't research the facts. -In 1978, when CFC bans were being considered as law, DuPont formed a lobby, "Alliance for Responsible CFC Policy" to fight the ban. -In 1986, DuPont developed a new formula that would reduce the ozone depleting effects, called HCFC. -Upon receiving a patent for these, DuPont immediately reversed course, stopped lobby against the ban, and began a public awareness campaign of the dangers of CFCs, calling for safer replacements...like HCFCs. Just facts, no silly attempts at authoritarian speech , just What Happened.

@ZeHydra

6 жыл бұрын

Freight Train "didn't research the facts"... Do you even know why DuPont lobbied against the ban? Because there was no direct evidence of CFC's impacting ozone depletion back in the 70's. Only in 1985 when Joseph C. Farman provided crucial research with raw data did it prove that CFC's were directly impacting the ozone layer. I don't think i need to provide further research on what happened after the researches release, as you would know that it wasn't only DuPont that was researching for alternatives beyond this point. Neither were their single patent holders for HCFC'S and HFC's. More than 17 company's started producing substitutes at the same time. Also let's not forget DuPont was the first and perhaps the only company in the late 70's to actually look for substitutes to CFC's while all other companies ignored it. You make DuPont sound like the bad guy, when in reality when they could've founded an alliance with other CFC producers to lobby and limit the impact of the Montreal protocol (signed 1987 btw), they formed an alliance to find substitutes and replacements... They are heralded as a key by scientists and government officials alike to be the first company to stretch their industrial power to battling CFC production. Sources: static1.squarespace.com/static/538a0f32e4b0e9ab915750a1/t/538db61ee4b0f4bbdccb70fb/1401796126905/Falkner_2005_Business_Ozone_Layer_Protection.pdfmon eng.ucmerced.edu/people/awesterling/SPR2014.ESS141/Assignments/DuPont P.S. The "Alliance for Responsible CFC policy" was formed in 1980;s. It would also be wise not to quote greenpeace on such matters. As they were famous for spreading nonsensical propaganda against all corporations back in the 80's and 90's. For example: Nuclear power...

@freighttrain7143

6 жыл бұрын

Not greenpeace. Wikipedia. Hey, at least you have some references for your side of it. Which is unusual for KZread comments standards :) Where is the pdf originally from, the one hosted on Squarespace. I will read it just wondering where it was originally from, looks re-hosted here. There are example of responsible corporations, for sure. This sure didnt sound like it from the research I did, but maybe it is an exception. I will read your references, and I appreciate the intelligent debate.

@ZeHydra

6 жыл бұрын

Freight Train I know it sounds unreasonable that a big corporation would comply. It also took them a long time to comply, i don't fully thank them but they did play a major contribution in making people stand for the Montreal protocol. They at least acted when we needed them is the part, instead of ignoring and just bribing through it. The pdf is from a book: mitpress.mit.edu/books/business-global-environmental-governance You can try to get access or buy it. I know the reference is Wikipedia, who reference it from a greenpeace article from the 80's, i think these are the 2 main articles referenced in Wikipedia: www.multinationalmonitor.org/hyper/issues/1991/10/doyle.html web.archive.org/web/20120406093303/archive.greenpeace.org/ozone/greenfreeze/moral97/6dupont.html As someone based in the scientific field i fail to grasp and believe in literature pieces without proper citations. I would totally be willing to believe in the first article of the above references but its "Harvard business said this" but where did it say this becomes the problem.. Its good to know someone is actually taking time to read references i'm putting out. Because the last time i had a debate about megalodons on a youtube thread, someone called a journal of science article phony and internet bullshit....

Adorable how they gloss over natural processes causing almost the entirety of the variation in the ozone layer.

@michaelkenyon3372

6 жыл бұрын

do go on and cite some shit.

@SternLX

6 жыл бұрын

Do your own homework. I'll get you started, research O3 and what natural process forms it(Hint: Heat and UV Light). Now ask yourself, what part of the planet has the most UV light and heat?

@michaelkenyon3372

6 жыл бұрын

what is the natural process that explains a drop in ozone? less uv from the sun? has someone run the numbers on a decrease in UV from the sun that can account for this better than free radical Cl removing ozone?

@PrinsTsabi

6 жыл бұрын

He said it at 2:44. They're not denying natural processes causes ozone depletion

@duradim1

6 жыл бұрын

Apple, don't let facts confound the confused. People believe this leftists BS and are stuck on stupid.

Just checked the current state of the O-Zone Layer via the link you mentioned in the description box. IT IS MUCH WORSE!

You should see the explanation they came up with for how the CFCs that are 6x as dense as air get into the stratosphere while, at the same time, the tons and tons of chlorine gas that are produced by the action of UV light on the oceans and that is way lighter than air, somehow don't... It's convoluted to say the least. If you brought the "ozone layer" down to sea-level it would be about 1 to 2 millimetres thick. Yeah, ozone is better at absorbing UV than diatomic oxygen, but it's not the millions of times better it would need to be for the ozone layer to be significant. NOAA has charts of ozone layer concentration over time and charts of UV intensity at the surface over time, and if you put them together it's immediately obvious that there is no measurable correlation between the two. The whole CFC ban was based on one study, funded by the company that produced the freon replacement. The new stuff is more toxic, less stable, and more difficult to build refrigeration units to use, but once they convinced major governments to ban freon it made them a bundle, and by the time we got to where we could launch atmospheric composition study satellites and get a good read on what's actually in the upper atmosphere, and discover that there's no freon up there (even though it *is* still in use in various places around the globe) everyone has moved on, so we'll be stuck with the ban for the rest of eternity.

First: this science was only ever theorized second: China did not stop using CFC's until 2005 and I am willing to bet they and third world countries are still using them. Third the replacement is still ozone depleting and still being used around the world. Fourth the chlorine is said to remaim in the atmosphere for 50-100years. Fifth Dupont jumping on board was because they saw an opportunity to secured the patents to the replacement. And yet clowns wants to tell you that it is magically fixing itself!!!!!! And you all eat it up because it fits your narrative.

@chocolatethunderiii4462

6 жыл бұрын

Joe Hemsworth so are you saying we should spend more tax money to fix it or that it never existed cause you proved one or the other

@xlReGaRdLeSslx

6 жыл бұрын

It's good to see not everyone is a sheep.

@ericredd7464

6 жыл бұрын

Joe, I'm glad to see someone else not drinking out of the punch bowl.

@dukeoftoilettown

6 жыл бұрын

And aren't CFC's heavier than air? How then do they get into the stratosphere?

@jesusgutierrez1446

6 жыл бұрын

Toby Blair they don't, the scientific evidence was done in a lab. Its like homeboy said, DuPonts patton was about to run out they made a new refrigerent and the old one was made illlegal....same thing is happening now btw as we go from r-134 to i forget lol but its called something like y1234 or someshing. All business

There was no hole to begin with. It's a natural area of thinning. It's mainly over the poles and has more to do with light exposure and temperature. Where does the sun shine the most light? Where on the globe is it warmest? Where is the thickest part of the Ozone? Answer those 3 simplest questions and you'll get the answer to: How is O3 formed? BTW, the Molar Mass of Chlorine(Cl2 = 70.9 g/mol) is much higher than O3(43 g/mol). Most of the Chlorine gas lingers well below the O3 layer. If anyone bothered looking up the real science behind the interactions they'd quickly see the whole Ozone depletion thing was a Dupont scam to sell R134a in it's place(cost less to produce but they can sell it for more). But hey, lets keep selling that fake science to make Big Energy and Big Chemical Co.'s more money eh?

@elbuggo

6 жыл бұрын

Agree with you. I suspect this scare was purely based on political pseudo science.

@AMotoVlogger

6 жыл бұрын

Perhaps Congress will introduce a bill regulating how often volcanos are allowed to erupt, that'll show em.

@aylemao6181

6 жыл бұрын

offcourse it is, like many other things, but people love to jump on band wagons and bitch

@donqpaul5551

6 жыл бұрын

Well said

@fenrirtheashenwolf7627

6 жыл бұрын

WTF? Scientists devote their life into their research by continued studying and observations. Have you read the research or the explanations as to why this happened? Have you studied the atmosphere, chemistry, or fluid dynamics? There are much more factors than those 3 questions you stated, you idiot. Just plainly reading articles in the net doesn't make you better than scientists and doesn't make you "educated enough" to figure out something. LOL

for the record, fridges and Ac's STILL use FREON and it is absolutely still a CFC and i don't know why they're allowed to still use it if we're taught in schools they're not. my dad fixes appliances and even new appliances still use the same freon....

so heres the kicker. "freon" a CFC is heavier than air. as a matter of fact there are "sniffers" that can find a freon leak by holding it close to the ground. if released and sprayed straight up into the air, it will fall back to earth and fall to the ground, and accumulate in low lying areas. in times of high wind, its not whipped around much as its much heavier than air, and tends to stay together. once it does break up the elements remain heavier than air and close to the ground. they also are non toxic when they break up.

It is still there. it's always been there. When the Sun rays pass through our atmosphere it creates Ozone O3. It has always been a hole around Antarctica because there isn't enough sun light passing through the atmosphere there to create o3.

@wayneenterprise463

7 жыл бұрын

Someone was not paying attention in chemistry and biology lecture

@suoppsdn9751

7 жыл бұрын

Try this out and see what you think. The global warming is due to more moisture in the atmosphere. Follow me on this. When you have a lot of moisture in the atmosphere it gets warmer and it keeps it's temperature up during the night. When there isn't much moisture it gets even hotter because there isn't much moisture to help block the sun's rays from reaching the earth. Look at this as an example. A desert is extremely hot during the day and at night the temperatures dip down to very low temperatures. In the thirties has been recorded in some desert regions. Why? Because close to no moisture in the atmosphere to help hold the heat in. I blame Global warming on more moisture being in the atmosphere. Not the whole that's been there since who know when. There are a lot of ways that is created. electricity, Sun Rays and heat itself

@Krytern

6 жыл бұрын

Did you miss the part where in the 80s there was no hole there?

@suoppsdn9751

6 жыл бұрын

It has always been a hole there. Like I said when sun light passes through our atmosphere it creates O3 Ozone. The reason there is a hole is because it doesn't get direct sun light. It's not hard to find. I paid attention in science class. Just look up Ozone and Sun light.

@suoppsdn9751

6 жыл бұрын

I hope so that's always been there also

2:27 so if methan drags the clorreen out of the ozoen :-\ so then..... everyone let it ripp XD

@squid9760

6 жыл бұрын

Caleb Hill methane* chlorine* ozone*

@noisyash4234

6 жыл бұрын

Then methane is a greenhouse gas

I miss this era of seeker

Wait, wait, wait... The #1 radiation shielding element of the O-Zone layer is actually O2. O2 hitting radiation actually CREATES O3. O3 then dissociates when it's hit by different radiation. ClO... also dissociates when it's hit by radiation. Not sure about the different wavelengths, though. Also, something I never understood is why the 'hole' (really a thin spot) in the O-Zone layer was over Antarctica. How did the CFCs get there from the northern hemisphere where they were all being produced and used? How did they cross the equator? Or, maybe the thinning of the O-Zone layer was caused by a reduction in solar activity at the time that reduced the amount of radiation that *formed* the O3 in the first place. There's also a smaller thin spot above the Arctic circle (these spots see the most radiation because of the geomagnetic poles), and it thinned and grew at the same times, which also (roughly) corresponded with peaks and drops in solar activity. I'm not 100% sure, but it seems there's a lot more going on than we were told.

@fleecemaster

6 жыл бұрын

Of course, science is damn complex as the systems it models contain millions of factors. That's why it takes so long to learn science and for studies to show findings. Also why it's often very hard to explain to the public and has to be really simplified for them. All the answers to the things you are asking are available, it would just take a lot of time to explain them, or for you to learn about them. It's really up to you if you want to put that time in though!

I have a question, is cfc's caused the hole in the ozone layer wouldn't the hole be located over major cities not the unpopulated Antarctica. Doesn't that prove that it's due to another cause?

@larslenke1242

7 жыл бұрын

It's because of the cold temperatures in Artica and Antarctica

@Lonewolf-hu2vn

7 жыл бұрын

Lars Lenke if that's true than the hole "healing" is because of global warming right?

@larslenke1242

7 жыл бұрын

Lonewolf No. The hole is healing because there is less cfc being used

@Lonewolf-hu2vn

7 жыл бұрын

Lars Lenke so how does the cold temperatures matter?

@larslenke1242

7 жыл бұрын

Lonewolf The cold temperatures help the cfc to destroy the ozone