Finally, Don has spoken.

You've been explaining the recent happenings in the world of physics to me since I was a 12 year old boy. I'm now a 23 year old man with a bachelor's in physics and I feel even further from my dreams of contributing to experimental or theoretical physics in any significant capacity. I'll see you in a few years, hopefully with a PhD. :)

@oreokid101v2

3 жыл бұрын

@@jeffallen3382 Yeah, I'm not very active in the comments section 😅

@valentinmalinov8424

3 жыл бұрын

If is too difficult to make a contribution to experimental physics, why you do not try theoretical physics? The fact is that in the last 100 years there is no significant advance in the understanding of the fundamental elements as - What Energy is; What Electromagnetism is; What Time is; What Space is...Anyway, they are looking for a new physics, which can unify QM and TOR. Why you have not read my book - "Theory of Everything in Physics and The Universe"? It is possible that there you can find an idea for your great theoretical discovery, which will make you a great scientist. You will never succeed if you never try!

@kumar-qb2pe

3 жыл бұрын

@@valentinmalinov8424 yeah I'm also fascinated to think about these fundamentals from childhood and now I'm working in that way

@jansenart0

3 жыл бұрын

Learn controls engineering. There's no money in physics.

@valentinmalinov8424

3 жыл бұрын

@@kumar-qb2pe Very good! Keep going questioning the proposed scenarios with facts and logic and one day inevitably you will succeed to produce something unique and valuable. I will suggest you tackle this problem - What is this force, which is bending Einstein's space? Where is its origin and where it is going after bending Space?

After all the hype I was waiting for Don's take on it. I'm not disappointed. Clearly explained with a pinch of charm.

@user-ex1fq6oz4p

3 жыл бұрын

He is the best!

@hajorm.a3474

3 жыл бұрын

Charismaaa

@franksavage1499

3 жыл бұрын

Yeah, I really can't understand why there is not millions of subscribers to this channel, this is so good, fun and easy to understand content :)

@drdon5205

3 жыл бұрын

@@franksavage1499 Tell all your friends to subscribe!

@franksavage1499

3 жыл бұрын

@@drdon5205 I will, I have shared a few videos and know that some of my friends have watched them :)

This is masterful science communication. I don't know who at the Fermilab office asked you to do the KZread channel, Dr. Don, but you have truly found your calling. You and everyone behind the scenes who's involved.

@beeheart6529

Жыл бұрын

I agree! I’ve tried for years to learn about subatomic particles with no success until I found this teacher!

@fikretonderbudakin2643

3 ай бұрын

Earth's gravitational waves contribute positively to the spin and kinetic energy of fermions. For this reason, since the muon is heavier than the electron, the muon has more magnetic power than the electron. Different laboratories around the world produce different results due to the different 'gravitational acceleration'. If the experiment were carried out in space, it would probably give the same result as the theory.

Former BNL employee worked on that magnet on Long island NY . Proud 🤗

The thing I love about Don's videos is how he stresses that in science, finding new questions can be as exciting as finding answers. A result which tells us "we don't know, we need to do more research" is actually a great result.

@theeniwetoksymphonyorchest7580

Ай бұрын

In some ways science is about finding better questions.

I could listen to him lecturing for hours. ☺️

@fantasia55

2 жыл бұрын

and I do!

@sudeeptaghosh

2 жыл бұрын

until my small brain overload..😥

This channel is a gem. I have been repeatedly impressed by the content. It seems as though it would be digestible by a wide audience, despite the complexity of the subject matter. This video was particularly well made.

Professor Frink: "g is exactly 2!" Audience: *gasps* Frink: "Very sorry that it had to come to that."

Finally, a video we've all been waiting for.

Congrats to Fermi Lab on achievement

Dr. Lincoln is such a great teacher. His delivery is always enjoyable and very informative. The G-2 uncertainty has been cycling through my mind since first becoming aware of it.

Thank you for explaining this

Thanks Dr. Don, this was great - and long expected!

This is the video I have been waiting for, best PR from Fermilab

Wow, thank you so much for such an in-depth quality explanation of the g-2 results!!! This is very exciting. Can't wait to find out what the different groups find over the next year or two!

I'd been looking forward to this! Back in April, I watched the live seminar when the results were first announced. It was incredibly well put together, and was the most compelling and informative scientific presentation I'd ever seen. Truly an outstanding model for scientific communication that should be studied by others.

Excellent presentation, Dr. Don. Lots more info than you usually provide which is appreciated, but as always, presented in ways that allow most anybody with an interest in physics to follow along.

Thank you for a digestible explanation of cutting edge science, love your videos Dr. Don!

Beautifully explained. You can sense his love for physics each team he explains something as fascinating as this. Thanks for explaining so well that even someone like me can understand

Best explanation I've heard/watched on the Muon g-2 experiment. As usual, Dr. Limon knows how to cut to the chase.

Hello Sir. Hope you are well. Take care!

It is amazing that there are human scientists that have the intelligence to understand stuff like this. Research like this is important, not because it has any immediate practical application, but because it furthers our understanding of our universe. Great work Femilab.

I love that being wrong is the best and most exciting thing for a physicist

Thanks for the video! A very exciting experiment!

Thank you for making this video. Great explanation!

Thank you all at Fermilab for the great work you do for us all. I desperately hope that option 2 is the case, I really don't want to give up the sci-fi fantasies that come with it :)

Excellent video, it's nice to have the long format again :)

This was great, easily the best explanation I've heard. And I didn't know about the lattice computations! That's really important to the story, it should be reported with this topic more widely.

Thank you so much. For a clear explanation of the facts so far.

Great to see you back Don

Your best post ever Dr. Lincoln.

This is my favorite series. Love it so much

Thanks for covering this topic.

Thank you for teaching us complex concepts in such a down to earth way.

What an excellent video. Thank you Dr Don

You are such a good teacher! I am so happy to find it’s possible for me to understand what scientists say about subatomic particles, at least partially.

Wow, this level of precision is mind boggling !! This is remarkably amazing !! Ok, lets go back to ignore friction...

Thank you very mich dr. Lincoln

In all, I would assume Feynman would be pleased if not jealous lol. I am thankful in your approach and inspiring a new generation of brilliance.

I’m so grateful for these videos. Thank you for the work you put in for us that are of the Dummy Tribe.

Incredibly clear, you have a gift

I joined the online seminar a few weeks ago -- even at 2am here in Britain, the excitement of breaking new ground was thrilling.

Can we have an updated video with the new results please!!

Best explanation so far

THANK YOU PROFESSOR LINCOLN...!!!

summed up, "we could be wrong, we don't know why, but we are oddly happy because of it".

Good job, Doc.

I am a big fan of the videos presented on this channel. Very cool stuff.

It reminds me to the GPS system inaccuracy. If we wouldn’t know about relativity, the GPS system clock would be off by 38 microseconds per day. It sounds to be just as small and insignificant, than the difference in this Muon experiment. But this little inaccuracy both leads to kilometers of inaccuracy in real world usage, and a whole new physics which changed how we understand the universe forever.

@henrytjernlund

3 жыл бұрын

Speaking of which, what if this tiny difference is an effect of gravity?

@artienia7908

3 жыл бұрын

@@henrytjernlund it is

@juzoli

3 жыл бұрын

@@henrytjernlund Gravity is way weaker than that. But you can believe, since gravity is the 4th fundamental force, and on the top of the lost of the biggest challenges in physics, it is always on the top of the list of ideas for explaining anything mysterious.

@davidespano8674

3 жыл бұрын

Engineers would have fixed the problem anyway empirically and have it work nevertheless. The truth is that we will never be able to know everything or know everything as our lifespans are limited and at some point the learning process as optimized as it could possibly be will reach its generational best. Problems will have to be fixed empirically and be at peace with that.

@juzoli

3 жыл бұрын

@@davidespano8674 Yeah, they would add some magical x multiplier, because that’s what they measure. Just like we add cosmological constant, and call it “dark energy”. But understanding WHY we need that correction is a whole different story.

The best at explaining complex ideas.

Best explanation yet.

Excellent explanation!

Thankx Doc.

Nice video. Thanks.

You're so fascinating. I don't always understand what you're saying but I'm fascinated all the same.

SCIENCE! MR DON!

thanks Don.

Dr. Lincoln, if I'm hearing you right, this research is going to help us go back in time and reach the speed of light. I'd settle for fewer ads on You tube.

I've been waiting for this

Amazing, just learned about your channel from pbs space time. Excited to deep dive!

Much appreciated, thx.

Loved this deep dive! What better place to get this dive than right from the Fermilab's (horse's) mouth. I've got my fingers crossed for new physics!!

Love this. So many of the early attempts to communicate the results of the BH and Fermi Lab experiments focus on “new physics” and completely ignored the lattice QCD results. Either way, bravo to all the scientists involved in the new computer calculations and in gathering the new experimental data. I can’t wait to learn how the next sets of experimental results and confirmation calculations turn out!

Waiting for you sir! You make advance science easily digestible for the common man.

I've been waiting for this video for a few years😍

@PMA65537

3 жыл бұрын

I waited so long all my muons decayed.

@lorenzobarbano8022

3 жыл бұрын

@@PMA65537 How fast were they going???

@PMA65537

3 жыл бұрын

@@lorenzobarbano8022 You should have seen the Lorenzo transform!

The more we know, the less we know :-) Anyway, thank you very much for this clear explanation of where science stands in this particular problem.

@alphagt62

3 жыл бұрын

That’s a good version of the old Einstein quote, “The more I learn, the less I know”.

@KaiHenningsen

3 жыл бұрын

@@alphagt62 I much prefer the version "The more we know, the more we know how little we know". Which incidentally is also related to good ol' Dunning-Kruger: when you know just a little, you have no idea how little you know, so you assume you know everything there is to know.

@OslerWannabe

3 жыл бұрын

No, not quite. The more we know, the more we know about how little we know, and the more we know about where to look next.

@TonyP9279

2 жыл бұрын

That's basically how real science works: You discover new questions.

@karaloop9544

2 жыл бұрын

@@KaiHenningsen I've come to liken that effect to an expanding circle where the outside is the unknown and the inside already accrued knowledge. The larger the circle of knowledge, the longer the boundary to the unknown becomes.

Awesome Don

Congrats to Don and the Fermilab team. An fresh alternative to CERN

In the expanding graviton model, gravitons are always coming into existence, expanding from a point, and overlapping. When large numbers of expanding gravitons overlap, they inevitably create the geometries for particle-anti-particle creation. When gravitons overlap and create the geometries for particles/antiparticles, that's the same as creating virtual particles.

@krumplethemal8831

5 ай бұрын

Interesting, do the gravitons lose energy when the overlap produces the particle anti particle pair?

Time for an update! 😊

so excellent

Impressive video 👍😀

Fascinating stuff.

I'm a simple man, I see a Fermilab video, I hit like.

Awesome. Love it

Fascinating 🖖🏼

Fascinating

This guy always explains things that I can't understand when someone else is saying it

It is wistful to see that this alluring experiment was left behind by the Nobel Committee

classic...loved it

thanks

The fields that make up space in the time/space continuum are only superficially understood. While we have some knowledge from experiments, our understanding is limited to the results of those experiments. It's like never having seen 4 types of fruit grown on Rigel 4, being blindfolded, and asked to identify each by touch. You know they feel different but as to understanding what they are, well, you've only scratched the surface.

Great explanation. I wonder... in this experiment muons need to go fast so they have enough livetime due to relativistic effects. How fast? Are other relativistic effects to consider? For example in their interactions with virtual particles... thanks!

So the QCD predictions match observations with the recent lattice QCD computation. What about other models, such as string theory? Are there predictions there that match observations?

@8:12 "what does it all mean? Well first, lets be honest, we don't know." lol

could you derive the relative size difference of muons and electrons using the g factor? if the muon is larger its maximum electromagnetic field strength should be smaller than that of an electron thus less matter/antimatter creation and less of a "cloud" adding to the g factor and vice versa

Wow that's interesting It takes sooo long for the results but well worth the wait

Great video Dr. Don! So, basically what you are saying is that we don't know what we think we know until we know it and even then the answer might be wrong or right depending on how you look at it. 😉😉😂😂

@drdon5205

3 жыл бұрын

Welcome to my world.

Need a good tailor there bud. Great video!

Intro music is epic. Feels like im about to meet a hero. Wait a minute.... Its dr. don lincoln.... a hero. 😯

1:17 and how much it is spinning ? It does spin ?? Is it variable or constant ??? 1:41 according to windows calculator which may be wrong 0.1% higher than 2 is exactly 2.002 - it is NOT 0.00238 that should be more than 0.1% something like 0.119% 2:15 and we know they are particles, not the waves in the moment of measurement ? 12:50 and what is with low mass high size case ?

Are there any previous results in any other experiments or data interpretations that appear similar in the range of discovery that is presumed?

I would be most curious as to how the lattice calculations vary with "grid size". For example, if calculating on a slightly smaller grid moves the computed g-2 value away from the experimental measurements (toward zero, say), then one might reasonably surmise that calculating with a substantially larger grid would result in a g-2 value even closer to the experimental value(s). [The decades old dream of doing very accurate tau precession experiments may re-emerge, probably still remaining a dreamy dream.]

Do you think that quantum computers will eventually help calculate the lattice QCD?

Cloud of particle anti particle pairs around electron. The cloud slightly enhances the magnetic effect of the electron

May be the FSC is the key for the gap alpha=(1/g44*1/beta^2)*3/4*gama(1-ln3)^2 g44 Metric-number from GR beta=1/gama from SR -ln(3)=+ln(1/3) is from Thermodynamics Entropy W=1/3 is the probability to go in to x, y, z direction. So the space must be 3-Dimensional everywhere?

0:30 that epic music is so satisfying

Could the subatomic energy cloud with the supposed mater antimatter energy conversion taking place simply vary in density...

Really great video, especially to get context about the experiments in fermilab If I may, I just have small "advice" : (Idk your budget, and I really mean well, we need more educational videos, especially on quantum mechanics. If the green screen is not used, you can maybe used a set, with half the screen for the key points. A little bit of cuts in the editing, I'm amazed that you can get a lot of these script without cuts, but it can add a bit a rhythm in the video, less breathing noises. Microphone aren't cheap, but it peaks a little bit to much, I think the clip on mic doesn't help The lightning is bright, which maybe necessary because of the green screen, but it seems that the light is not diffused, or not enough. I don't know if you'll se this comment, but please keep posting, those small notes aren't that important. I'm just nitpicking about details. A lot of science channels use green screen with a space background. Some onsite set can boost the production, especially for fermilab, it would be so great ! Btw your generic is AWESOME ! Great production, seems legit.