Love the videos, with some of the best content and resources out there! What I do find interesting is I noticed that each application varies in terms of quality depending on the time of day. I cannot speak for every application but have noticed such for mid journey, and Leonardo . For example I have created over 1,000 images in both over the course of hours using the same prompt (not regenerate) and noticed as time progressed images would go from worse to really good. I decided to test such only after noticing that when I created great images from a specific prompt a day before and used them the next day they would render rubbish. Adding how the more coins and time spent the better the results would be. I am not sure if anyone one else had the same experience. Where certain time of day, length of time and so forth tend to result in higher quality images being produced. But great video as I love the content you put out each week! Keep them coming!

The new Leonardo Diffusion XL just came out yesterday (probably after you recorded this video). It is actually based on SDXL 0.9 model unlike the Dreamshaper V7 you used that is based on SD 1.5. Would have been great to see how an actual SDXL based model would have faired against the other image generators. Hoping to see a review of the new Leonardo SDXL model soon from your channel. Keep up the good work. We appreciate what you do!

@RandomCreationsOG

5 ай бұрын

I thought a similar thing. SD and SDXL have so many models it's not a true representation of what it does. Especially Dreamshaper. It's really good, but is an old model. (I don't have anything against older models. RevAnimated is one of my favs) There are some crazy good ones out there, and they all have their own style. I prefer automatic1111 but Leo is good. Playground ai actually has more SDXL models than Leo

Yet again, outstanding content from an outstanding author. I really appreciate the amount of work you must have put into this article and the net result was a goto chart I know I will want to return to, over and over. In fact, I will probably make my own version of your chart in a spreadsheet, and add the important column I think was missing -- Weight. Each one of criteria can assume a relative importance to the type of image normally produced by the creator, the look and feel of the image desired, the amount of money available for the project., etc. So I am going to add a column called "Weight" which will multiply the results in the colums by a weight of 1-10 -- and that will make your chart absolutely perfect!

Absolutely love your content Matt. I love the advances in AI at the moment and know more than most people in my circle, when they ask if theres anywhere to keep in the loop, your channel is my go too recommendation for ease of information. Please keep crushing it!

Great job Matt! We appreciate all the work that went into this video. My takeaway was a little different from yours (tiling images throws off sums as it’s a very specific use case, and - for me - accuracy would be much more heavily weighted). But looking at the same information and coming to a different conclusion is the mark of truly being informed!

Great job as usual, Matt. Only thing that skewed it a bit is that the you were using SDXL 0.9 in Leonardo instead of SDXL1.0 from over at Clipdrop - the quality and accuracy jump from 0.9 to 1.0 was pretty major in my experience. Recently when illustrating a book for a client, 0.9 was pretty much unusable, whereas since 1.0 came out, it's become our go-to.

I appreciate this video, Matt. I'm already rewatching it for the second time. I use many illustrations of people doing their occupations for my work, and use Midjourney. Typically I am looking for a realistic black and white high-quality drawing. Others I do are historical color photos of Civil War soldiers and that type of thing. I have to take almost every illustration into Photoshop and fix the wonky faces, hands, etc. I appreciate the time Mj saves me over doing this work from scratch, but we still have a ways to go. Like you always say, it can only get better. I know you usually say "this is the worst it will ever be." 🙂 The one additional thing I would have liked to see in your video is prompting with an image. Often I have to use a reference image to get into the ballpark of what I want.

The reason I love gpt dall E 3 is because it can create images difficult to describe, like if you get it to give you an entire lab report and then just ask it to generate a realistic image of the lab setup, it can do it

@NineSeptims

5 ай бұрын

Yeah image generators really need to be combined with other smart ai that can comprehend what hands or eyes are meant to look like

@The_Novu

3 ай бұрын

Too censored to be useful.

@BOSS_1417

3 ай бұрын

@@The_Novu yep, major issue, also the decrease in accuracy and increase in errors

@GregoryTorres13

3 ай бұрын

I think this is very underrated in this review. So far it seems the Dalle-3 ability to handle complex images is far superior to the others which seem to struggle with multiple subjects.

@nickgirdwood3082

3 ай бұрын

​@@The_NovuThat's not true.

The effort you put in for giving quality content is simply marvelous. 🔥👌👍🏽

Your review is nothing short of remarkable, complete, eclectic, and incredibly concise. 😊

Such an amazing video and explanation!!! Your effort and dedication is truly appreciated 🙌

27:25 with the prompt like [Create a seamlessly tileable texture ofa circuit, ensuring that there are no visible edges or seams when repeated.], Dall E-3 does it

Matt, what a fantastic overview of all these products which can be overwhelming deciding which one to use for what. Thanks for the clarity. Love the channel!!!

Nice job! It's really interesting to see a direct comparison between the different models. One thing I may mention, though, in the video it looks like your image generation in Leonardo is set to Dreamshaper v7, which is a SD 1.5 model. SDXL should be able to do a slightly better job at text.

I've been needing this kind of comparison. This is really appreciated, thank you so very, very much, Matt. Great vid as always. 🙌

Matt, this is the most comprehensive and informative video I've seen on this subject. Thank you for all you do! Keep up the most excellent work! 💜

Thank you for always making these incredibly informative videos. I always look to you for where to put my time and energy and you’ve made this crazy AI journey feel less overwhelming with each video. 🙏🏼☯️🌞

Great video. It would be really interesting if you could do this again in maybe 6 months time, to see what things look like then 🙂

Hey Matt, thanks for keeping us up to date :-) What you did not test and what's proven to be important for me is the ability to train your own models. Leonardo does that.

As a data nerd, this checked ALL the boxes. Near the end I started adding all of them up, assuming you wouldnt and then you did and I just felt so complete. Like that final "ahhhh" perfect! Excellent video and welp worth the effort. I would absolutely LOVE to see a similar comparison for other categories on text based, math, programming etc. PLEASE MATT

Matt this was truly excellent. Please make this a regular thing you do, upon major releases from the leading platforms. As someone who has generated over 20,000 images in MJ, and about a 1000 in DallE3, I can say you nailed it. I really enjoyed seeing how the models I don't regularly use, stacked up. Please do this again with MJ6 in December.

@skiboltskieskye1238

3 ай бұрын

May I ask what you are planning to do with all these generated images? And do you keep everything you create or do you delete the imperfect ones as you go?

@armondtanz

Ай бұрын

Hey. They sound like the figures I've generators. I found a great 1. Freepik. Its just really good at loads of stuff. U get millions of stock fotos/videos Sketch to generate Re imagine (just churns out unlimited versions) Enhance , creative upscaler A hidden gem.

Wow... wish you would do that with other tool-categorys as well! Good job. I admit, in the beginning I didn t think that a comparison would be intrresting... but it makes it easier to "digest" the learning of your video (that usually before have been a little "hectic" nervous... because of the quantity of information in AI. Thanks for your work!

Wow Matt, the work you put into these videos is incredible. Thank you for all the effort and brilliant content. This video particularly was so helpful to me (and others I'm sure). I managed to get a print-out of your final comparison chart. It's so helpful to have it all in one place like that. Perfect. Thanks again

Thank God for this timely post, I had begun working on this very project this morning - you have better criteria and saved me a ton of work - may you be blessed for this good deed

Great video! I would very my scores from yours ever so slightly, but over all I thought this was an awesome rubric review of all these tools. I enjoyed watching it, thank you.

Thanks for all the hard work. Some of these I've never used. Bing Image Creator with Dalle-3 is my go to.

Great video! I would have been interested in which ones are the best quality in terms of the size/resolution of images you can create. So many of these output very small/low resolution images that either require upscaling or are unusable for anything other than small web graphics. But, maybe that can be in the next one. Great work Matt! 😊

@ScaryStoriesNYC

7 ай бұрын

I've sometimes used Midjourney images in videos without upscaling when I was pressed for time. widescreen 16:9 images are around a thousand pixels wide, whereas DALLE will give you 275 px square useless crap. But its' still better to find a good uplscaler. OH-- Midjourney now has a 200% and a 400% upscaler BUILT IN but you have to spend fast hours to use it.

Thanks for a great video! Very informative and thorough. Do any of these allow you to upload your own images to play with?

Wow, that's a great comparison. Very interesting! Thank you for making this video. As a daily Leonardo ai user I have to mention that it can do much more. The model DreamShaper v7 was used in the video but there are many more amazing models to use on Leonardo ai. The most powerful ones right now are: Leonardo Diffusion XL, Leonardo Vision XL, AlbedoBase XL and PhotoReal. They create amazing results.

Thank you so much for putting the time and effort into this video. This has helped me so much and saved me a lot of time 10/10

This was a great breakdown, I literally just starting learning about image AI and I really needed to see some comparisons so I knew which one to try. Thanks!

Excellent work! And thank you for all of your time you put into it. For vector I would def suggest to use another model than dreamshaper 7.0. But glad to see it still outscored all others. I use both MidJourney and Leonardo and wanted to see this video to see the difference with everything else available

@Interdimensionaltravelagent

7 ай бұрын

I mean with SD the same seed and prompt will always be similar, that is actually one remain it is great with making characters in a similar scene and other uses. Also, you need to add more to your prompt for realism like “photo” in most image generators or some will randomly generate more illustrative images.

Super show, as always, Matt! I am glad I invested in Leonardo. Now I need to go get some value out of it!

Stable diffusion by a long shot. It takes extra work, sometimes lots of extra work, but it's the only one that's capable of producing exactly what you are imagining consistently.

@o1f444

5 ай бұрын

it definitely is not, i'm not sure how long you've been using stable diffusion but i bet you'll find out that its actually very limited.

@jtjames79

5 ай бұрын

@@o1f444 dude. That was like a whole month ago. I still stand by it if you're using ComfyUI, but that could change later today.

Super Video! I am using a lot of AI generators because of all these different possibillities. But most of the time I spend on Local Stable Diffusion, not only because I love the Open Source movement very much: I like the idea that creative people all over the world are working on improving SD... BTW: With the new SDXL tiling you can also choose between horizontal or vertical tiling. Happy colored Greetinx

Very helpful and thank you for the wonderful work you do. (Voice gets a bit squeaky, but I guess that’s part of your brand). I appreciate you.!

Great job Matt. Thanks for all your hard work in putting something like this together. Problem is it never stays up to date for very long.

Thank you for all your hard work. As a MidJourney subscriber, I've been wondering if I should stick with it or look at something else and this has been really helpful. Accuracy in MidJourney has certainly been a bugbear with it sometimes taking six or seven prompts to get what you want, and you addressed that perfectly.

Excellent video, as always, thank you. Just a note to color spaces: RGB is the color space used for digital displays, similar to how CMYK is used for printing. Given that all non vector images generated by AI are until now inherently in RGB mode, the term "RGB image" in a prompt may not convey specific color requirements or color choices to an AI image generator and should not be seen as a flaw in the output.

Love it - pretty detailed comparison- thanks for doing it Matt. I’m a fan of your weekly contents

If Midjourney can create their own LLM and integrate it with its Image creator, Dalle3 won't stand a chance. Censorship will kill Dalle3, but I don't think OpenAI cares. Dalle3 is free (Bing version), so there's no incentive to change anything about it because the ChatGPT audience and the AI Art audience are different.

@ScaryStoriesNYC

7 ай бұрын

Yes, thank you for saying that. I haven't been able to generate usable images with DALL E between it's censorship and weird color scheme. The images it makes are too tiny, they look fugly when enhanced IMHO

@Staravora

7 ай бұрын

The censorship makes it almost unusable for real Like it's blocked probably half the images I tried to create. It even didn't like "graffiti" like wtf

@digidope

7 ай бұрын

My coin is that rather than waiting Dalle to be less sencored, expect that MJ will be more censored. They ban new words on daily basis and when the web version launches they might set new moderation rules. It's not about LLM. Dalle understands prompts better as the dataset was properly captioned. There is a white paper explaining it on Open Ai site. MJ would need to re-train their models from ground up with same level of image captioning to get as good with prompts as dalle is.

Thanks for video. I think it was a good work from your side. Like the bing chat image creator myself at the moment. I would also like to see what offline AI or offline creators at the moment is the best. Thinking more on the privacy and if information when using an AI is not supposed to go online.

I appreciate the effort you went through to give an overview on this. I disagree with some things (There are other SDXL alternatives to Leonardo that are free and work great), but the overview of what the different services are capable is pretty useful. Kudos!

Thanks so much, Matt! That was such a well done and thorough survey of all those apps. I've been taking a course that's been covering several of them, but I've been overwhelmed and figured it would make more sense to focus on just one or two of them. You've helped me determine that Midjourney and Leonardo will probably be the primary ones I use, as well as a little Firefly here and there, as well as some Google and maybe even Ideogram (which I hadn't even heard of until you brought it up).

Thanks so much for taking the time to make this video ! Very informative 🙏

Leonardo AI added a new refiner called Alchemy Refiner, which goes back to correct any malformed limbs and hands. And I love it's Canvas feature which allows you to go back and fix spot work defects. Or add images to images and linking them together

That was a great video, I found the information to be exactly what I have been looking for, I would like to see how capable they are on different operating systems, iOS, Mac, windows, Linux overall a great video thanks for all the hard work

I look forward to having people review Novelai when they roll out their image generator update. They are making an image generator from the ground up - right now it's a fork of SD that's specialized for anime and takes prompts differently because it's trained off of danbooru - it has a free tier, credits you can buy, and multiple paid tiers, and it's fully uncensored. If the bot understands what you want it to generate it will do it.

Hi Matt, this is one of your great video, Highly admire and appreciate your effort. I would request to make 2 more parts of this, because different platforms gives different results according to their prompt dependancy, like keywords or negative prompts. You may also share more other comparison tools like bot avatars or whatever you like best. Thanks

@mreflow

6 ай бұрын

Thanks for the feedback. I actually wanted to compare a lot more but didn't want to make a 2-hour video. I'll likely do a followup though. :)

Dalle-3 is great unless you like horror images or any artist in the last 100 years anything even marginally risque that involve women or celebrities. Its way to censored hope they dial it back a bit otherwise people will bail really fast on it when the new Midjourney model comes out that incudes better accuracy and text.

@wildstarr

7 ай бұрын

I was so confused today after Image Creator wouldn't let me do a zombie.

@bobpruss263

7 ай бұрын

100% truth man

@southcoastinventors6583

7 ай бұрын

@@wildstarr Dalle-3 cancelled Halloween

@krissnoe500

7 ай бұрын

Minor secret. Avoid use proper direct nouns like he she her him male or female. Use less direct terminology. I believe it'll get you better Dall-e results. Turns it into an image dice roll.

@bernhardbauer3064

7 ай бұрын

Firefly wouldn't generate a glove for me yesterday because of "sensitive content" lol

VERY in-depth video and great to see them side by side. Our personal opinion is like most things there is no perfect answer - so use things to their strengths. However as things are progressing very quickly in the world of AI, it be interesting to see a similar video from you in say March 2024 and see how its all progressed.

This table was great. I personally give a lot more weight to accuracy than anything else, as I don't really care how beautiful and in detail the image is, if it is not what I am asking for... Therefore, I don't agree with the overall scores, but it is great to have all of them organised by their strengths and weakneses. Awesome job!

Hands down, the best comparison of AI image generation as of October 2023! Thank you for taking the time to make this video and share it with all of us. I am of course subscribed with notifications enabled and thumbs up!

Great work! Thank you for this effort.

🎯 Key Takeaways for quick navigation: 00:00 📸 AI Image Generators Overview - Introduction to various AI image generators and the need to choose the best one for specific use cases. 01:08 🔍 Accuracy Assessment - Testing accuracy by providing prompts and evaluating how well each AI image generator adheres to them. 04:09 🎨 Creativity Evaluation - Assessing the creativity of AI image generators by giving them minimal context and examining the resulting images. 08:37 🌟 Realism Analysis - Analyzing the realism of AI-generated images using a specific prompt and evaluating how convincingly they depict the scenario. 18:50 🎨 AI Image Realism Test - Mid Journey raw, Firefly 2, and Mid Journey without raw scored the highest in realism. - Google and idiogram performed poorly in creating realistic images. 19:59 🖌️ AI Image Illustrations Test - Mid Journey in nii mode excelled in creating colorful and contrasty illustrations. - Style raw mode wasn't suitable for illustrations. - Dolly 3, Bing Image Creator, Leonardo, and Firefly 2 produced decent illustrations, but lacked the contrast of Mid Journey. 26:13 🏞️ AI Image Tiling Test - Mid Journey, both regular and raw, successfully created tileable images. - Dolly 3, Bing Image Creator, Leonardo, Firefly 2, Google, and idiogram struggled to create seamless tileable images. 29:42 📝 AI Text in Image Test - Mid Journey and Mid Journey raw failed to generate accurate text in images. - Dolly 3 produced some images with text, but with typos. - Bing Image Creator also generated text, but with typos. - Leonardo and Firefly 2 didn't perform well in generating text. - Google and idiogram successfully added text to images, but Google struggled with multiple words. 33:53 🚫 AI Censorship Test - Mid Journey and Mid Journey raw had minimal censorship, allowing celebrity and IP-related content. - Dolly 3 restricted some content based on policies. - Bing Image Creator had increased censorship, blocking certain prompts. - Leonardo showed no censorship and allowed various content. - Firefly 2 had significant censorship, blocking both Tom Hanks and SpongeBob with Super Mario. - Google had censorship issues, blocking Tom Hanks and Super Mario-related prompts. - Idiogram had some censorship but allowed certain content. 37:07 🖼️ Image Generation and Censorship - Dolly, Firefly, and Leonardo can generate various images effectively. - Idiogram appears uncensored but lacks in image quality. - Mid Journey and Google have usability and censorship issues. 38:32 🤖 Usability Evaluation - Mid Journey's Discord interface can be overwhelming. - Dolly 3 in Chat GPT offers a familiar chat interface. - Leonardo provides versatility with a user-friendly interface. 42:17 💰 Pricing Comparison - Mid Journey offers a $10 monthly plan with limitations. - Dolly 3 in Chat GPT is the most expensive at $20 per month. - Leonardo has a free plan and a $10 per month plan, providing good value. - Firefly offers a free plan and a paid plan at $5 per month. - Google's image generator is free to use. - Idiogram is currently entirely free. 45:45 🏆 Conclusion and Recommendations - Leonardo is recommended as the best value with a score of 75.5. - Mid Journey and Idiogram offer different strengths and drawbacks. - Dolly 3 in Chat GPT is less recommended due to high cost and censorship. - Dolly 3 in Bing's Image Creator is an accurate, free alternative. Made with HARPA AI

SUPERB ......THANKS FOR YOUR EFFORT ....ALWAYS LOVE YOUR VIDEOS!!

Man. Thanks for doing all that work. I learned a lot. As far as Leonardo being totally uncensored, I was surprised to hear that. I tested its limits and got moderated pretty quickly, so It's not totally uncensored, but it does seem less so.

@mokiloke

7 ай бұрын

Yep i found its limits, but it was a sensible level. So many others are verging on puritanical.

@KasperKavalaris

7 ай бұрын

@@mokiloke Yea. I don't need p0rn but as an artist, I'll sometimes need references that aren't fully clothed. I'm thinking of installing Stable Diffusion locally, but Leonardo is a good option for now.

Thanks so much Matt...this is great. Is the spreadsheet available to download anywhere? Also since anything is possible now,,,can you drive a prompt through all the AI Tools simultaneously while also having them be graded by an AI Image Tool Super Bot? See humans never satisfied...

Matt -- this has been soo helpful. Ping-ponging back & forth btw the various image generators can be frustrating, but having a road map like the one you just created can hopefully take a bit of the struggle out of it.

Great video. I needed this. Just like with life you can see the bias in ai through the beauty prompt. Overall this was so helpful.

With DALL-E (2024/2) it is important to start a new chat any time you begin a new image concept, otherwise the context window will come to bear on the image produced. Also, DALL-E is using an LLM expert to take the raw prompt into the actual prompt that is sent to the model for inference/diffusion. If you call the Open A.I. API via a script, the JSON response includes the actual prompt sent for inference. See hugging face spaces for various "prompt generators" which provide similar functionality for the various A.I. systems including midjourney & stable diffusion.

Great job! The best of DALLE inside GPT is because it’s ALREADY inside of what I consider paying now is a great choice (meaning what gpt 4 provides)

Fantastic comparison vídeo! I laughed a lot seeing the images and learned a lot about the tools and the IA images generators in general. I'll give a 10 out of 10 :D

Thanks Matt for this effort to make a comparison between AI platforms 🙏🙏🙏

I need help! I am a photographer and I am trying to figure out how to create digital backdrops similar to Avezano dackdrops. What ai generators would create images with high enough resolution? I can't figure out what commands and promps to give to get what I want. Is there a way to take the shape, size, form of one image, but style, color, details of another image, take the little sled out of this image and put it in the corner?? I don't mind paying or it taking a long time to create as long as it gives me the results I want. Where do I start??

Hey great stuff! Question: since adobe went all in with AI in their software, is there any news on DaVinci Resolve following the same path?

awesome Matt..this means a lot on my productivity..for sure, this takes a lot of time to do..

I never thought someone would go above and beyond like this. Thanks a ton! 👍

Fantastic vid - the best comparative AI vid I've seen. Luv the table format. It'd be great to see an updated version a couple of times per year, maybe using the old table and just update the figures for changes due to upgrades. Just an Idea.

I think the score lack some weight like tile not much used. Something are more used should have more weight. In dall e 3 the price is free because your are paying for GPT4 and this come free with no additional cost

Great video. I really appreciate all the effort and work you put into making this. And it was super helpful for those looking into AI image generators. 👍

Excellent video. Thanks for putting in all the work Matt!

Once Musavir is out of Beta you will be amazed!! I was asked to beta test it and it is mind blowing 4K output and humans so real. Btw you should use -s 500 with style raw in Midjourney

Surprised to see Stable Diffusion leading the pack, especially when many seem to lean towards it for its lack of content restrictions. I've always been a fan of it due to its cost-effectiveness with a good GPU. However, with the community's diverse opinions on various AI tools, it's clear that there's more to these tools than meets the eye. The discussions around censorship, usability, and tool capabilities are particularly intriguing. It's a dynamic space, and I'm eager to see how these platforms evolve in response to user feedback and technological advancements. Cheers to the ever-evolving AI-ionosphere! 🚀

Thank you for taking the time to make this video! And thank you for helping me ease my mind, to stop thinking is there something better then my beautiful friend Leonardo 💪🔥

Leonardo just came out with Alchemy v2 and the new Refiner a few days ago.....these are amazing and vastly improves the image generations!!

Thanks. You are amazing, Sir! Very decent summary. Lots of ground covered. Loved it

Fantastic video comparisons!

Very valuable... Thank you for your time and effort.

this is awesome. thanks for doing all the research for us.

Well done Matt! Great quality video!

Thanks for these, love your blog too!!

Nice comparison, but just a note is that alot of the negatives you gave for SDXL can be fixed by using specific lora's or ADetailer or different refined models etc.

@I_Need_Hazelnut_Coffee

3 ай бұрын

@@elkabronzito Stable diffusion is the best one in my opinion, you can control every piece of it, using other images as references, I use Dalle-3 images from Bing and then edit them on Stable Diffusion. Stable Diffusion has a line art mode, I drew a bunch of shapes on a piece of paper and uploaded them, wrote a prompt, and it made an incredible image from the scribbles and shapes I made!

Thank you for this ! Great value . Two interesting addon would be portability ( mobile? ) , and output resolutions . Again, thank you 💪👍

Such great information Matt! Thank you for validating my personal preference for Leonardo! I love it.

Great but a lot of these are just style variations. A lot of use cases use an existing image as a start point so that would be good to cover, with the input image either providing the style or the size and shape. ControlNet support would be essential to getting a good score for this. Another use case involving an input image is inpainting/outpainting, along with a prompt to extend or replace part of it. A lot of generators can't even accept an input image so would get 0. How well the generator holds onto the essential qualities of input image that you're trying to capture while generating the aspects that go with it would define the score. Another that tests the abilities in mixed mode would be good too, as in it has understanding of real world data. A good test for this is to ask for the path of a river as a line on a map. For example "Draw the path of the River Thames as a thin red line on a map of Britain". Every image generator I've tried fails at this. Even prefixing something like "using accurate ordnance survey geographic data" still results in random drawings of rivers. Even when the outline of the Thames through London is well known and in plenty of training data images asking for that returns stylized imagery associated with the Thames instead of the actual shape.

Very Valuable...Thanks for taking the time. 👍

Great video Matt, very lengthy indeed, but well informative

Excellent analysis; thorough and well edited

Thanks for taking the time to go through all that. :)

... around 23:39, you could not have been more on point with logos of wolf, my profile pictures are the same but with a fox, i usually don't leave comments on videos but this part was kinda specific for what I have been doing and this was a great prompt and/or tip for me, I am happy I subscribed to you and watch your videos (I know your name is Matt Wolfe, that probably had some factors into the prompt) Lastly, keep up the great work Matt, very interesting video.

very rich and interesting video sequence, especially through the comparison and personal evaluation of some known AI image generator sites for certain characteristics of generated images that can be considered the most essential. the work accomplished is arduous but ultimately fruitful and very useful for people who, like me, are interested in this type of activity. Thank you a thousand times for this effective and knowledge-creating content.

Thank you, so much work you put in it! It’s so helpful!

Great content Matt 🔥🔥🔥 🚀

Fantastic review, Matt! Appreciate the deep dive.

Amazing, thank you for being so thorough!

Amazing! Just what I was looking for. Keep up the good work!

You can actually get excellent illustration style raw from midjourney if you promp for cartoon style, anime,anime cartoon etc.

I get the absolute best output with Night Cafe. I have tried 8 different ones (including the ones you reviewed)

This was a useful review, thanks for posting. It's always the hands and MJ still seems to hold it's own against the others (no pun intended), good to see the distinction between RAW and NIJI. May give Leonardo more time, not as impressed with it for anthropomorphic realism- which seems to be tough everywhere. Thanks Matt, appreciate the time and effort.