A well presented analysis and arguments. May Allah nourish you the more with His knowledge. Let us wait if they have counter arguments

@kitabullahwaitratiytv2241

Ай бұрын

Aamina ya rabil-alamiina my honourable Dr. Wishing you the same InshaAllah. Yes, we are waiting for them ooooo

@saliukehinde1314

Ай бұрын

@@kitabullahwaitratiytv2241 Bro Toliat, may Allah guide you to Sunnah and ultimately Jannah (paradise) Firstly, But you are just interpreting to suit your position.. Abu bakr was the one in the cave with the prophet Muhammed (SAW.).. Why don't you just easily open the same book, navigate to the Ahadith talking about the events of the cave during the migration, then show us what the book said about the identity of those inside the cave.. instead of you dissecting and interpreting two unrelated ahadith. Secondly, either Hadith 692 and 7175 is same or different,, the text of the Hadith did not discuss the identity of those inside the cave. Thirdly, let agree that the Hadith is one and same Hadith.. you can see that the place Saalim (RA) led prayer was first referred to as 'usbah' and also then referred to as 'masjid' in the same text of the Hadith. So, it was 'usbah' first, then later become 'masjid' after Prophet laid the first stone of its foundation and the masjid was built, it's no longer referred to as 'usbah'. *There are two different period indicated in the Hadith with the use of the words 'Usbah' and 'Masjid'* So the names of companion mentioned in the Hadith did not specify which period they prayed behind Saalim during prayers, be it Muhajirun or Ansar. All names were mentioned regardless of period. It's then easy to deduce that Abu bakr must have prayed behind Saalim after the masjid was built anytime he is in Quba while prophet is in Medina. Quba is just 2 or 3 miles away from center Medina. Hence, from the Hadith, it's possible that Abu bakr is part of those behind Saalim during prayers in Masjid Quba, and does not disqualify him from being in the Cave with prophet Muhammad (SAW) Allah know best.

This is a fatal fitnah of our time as common Muslims (with little knowledge of the Deen) will easily fall for falsehood for picking knowledge of Islam on the internet (social media - Facebook, WhatsApp, Google etc). May Allaah show us the truth as truth and grant us the strength to follow it. May He show us falsehood as falsehood and grant us the stamina to avoid it.

May Allah save us from blindness. Ibn Hajar in his explanation of Saheehul Bukhaari ( Fathul Baari) gave a very detailed and simple answer to the so called contradiction you are pointing to but since it is not what appeals to you, you would not quote or mention it ( that is assuming if you even know it ). But it would seem that even ibn Hajar too doesnt have a good grasp of Hadeeth like the rest of the Salafiyyah that you mentioned, that is why he did not classify it as a contradiction. Whether you like it or not, it was Abu Bakr (RADIYALLAHU AN HU) that was in the Cave with the Prophet ( Salallahu alayhi wassalam). This was something that was acknowleged by a number of Shia Scholars, top of them is Al majlisy in his Bihaarul Anwaar. You only quote scholars of Sunnah when you think their statemts are in your favour but you do not do so when its otherwise. I am no suprised, this has always been the style of the Shiites and Rawaafidh. May Allah protect us from your likes!

@AdebowaleTV

Ай бұрын

That's how sunnis scholars in Nigeria use to do too with Sheik Adam al ilory too, they will quote sheik Adam book to tackle Sheik habeeb if its in their favor even if sheik habeeb with sohih buhari but they will not if it's other wise. Even i don't know the trouble of you people if sohih bukhari is saying something that's not in your favor you will deny it that is shia statements but this bukhari books is the authentic to you this ahlu sunnah. Ha oga ooooooo

Fear Allah in every aspect of life

Jazakallah Khaeran Sheik Taliat, keep doing your good job with concrete evidence, they always lies against Shia, Ahlu Tawasowuf, Ahmadiya and any Muslims that doesn't belong to their doctrines

@kitabullahwaitratiytv2241

Ай бұрын

Wa iyyakum my honourable Sir. May Allah accept it as an act of ibaadah from us together INSHAALLAH. My regards Sir!

When you are reading hadith in Mukhtasoru Sohih Bukhaary and you mention name of inn Umar but you didn't say anything like Rodiyallahu anhu or something like this,why?

If we are saying Islam, it should be based on knowledge and not whims and caprices

@kitabullahwaitratiytv2241

Ай бұрын

Exactly, my honourable Dr. Jazakumullah Khaeran

4:10 It is clear what the aim of all these is. Firstly, the enemies of Islam will try to cast doubts on the pious predecessors of the past, hence the attack on Ibn Taimiyah etc. Then, the attack on the hadith scholars : Bukhari etc. The next stage is to attack the companions (May Allah have mercy on them)of the prophet (peace be upon Him). The ultimate aim is to destroy islam. May Allah ease our affairs

Wa asiabi Nabiyu,awon ara ilu.modina,iro e po,e kuku feran abubakt tele,oni iro ni e.

@kitabullahwaitratiytv2241

Ай бұрын

Check this below source👇👇: تاريخ المدينة المنورة لإبن شبه الجزء الثالث حققه: فهيم محمد شلتوت الصفحة: ٤٦ Second Hadith on that page. Jazakumullah khaeran

@user-we4dn8gp4u

Ай бұрын

@@kitabullahwaitratiytv2241 لم يعص الله.لاجل قوم،ادع الي الاسلام بقول الحسن.من المدير الذي يتكلم.برءيه

@kitabullahwaitratiytv2241

Ай бұрын

@@user-we4dn8gp4u ماذا تريد أن تقول يا أخي العزيز؟

Meaning of طرفه?

No body is perfect out six points hadith must not against common experece

bro ...go and read Fathul baari very well to know what Al -Imaam ibn Hajr said about what early scholars said about the two hadith and stop saying what suits your own stands alone. May Allah guide you to sunnah

Bro Toliat, may Allah guide you to Sunnah and ultimately Jannah (paradise) Firstly, But you are just interpreting to suit your position.. Abu bakr was the one in the cave with the prophet Muhammed (SAW.).. Why don't you just easily open the same book, navigate to the Ahadith talking about the events of the cave during the migration, then show us what the book said about the identity of those inside the cave.. instead of you dissecting and interpreting two unrelated ahadith. Secondly, either Hadith 692 and 7175 is same or different,, the text of the Hadith did not discuss the identity of those inside the cave. Thirdly, let agree that the Hadith is one and same Hadith.. you can see that the place Saalim (RA) led prayer was first referred to as 'usbah' and also then referred to as 'masjid' in the same text of the Hadith. So, it was 'usbah' first, the later become 'masjid' after Prophet laid the first stone of its foundation and the masjid was built, it's no longer referred to as 'usbah'. *There are two different period indicated in the Hadith with the use of the words 'Usbah' and 'Masjid'* So the names of companion mentioned in the Hadith did not specify which period they prayed behind Saalim during prayers, be it Muhajirun or Ansar. All names were mentioned regardless of period. It's then easy to deduce that Abu bakr must have prayed behind Saalim after the masjid was built anytime he is in Quba while prophet is in Medina. Quba is just 2 or 3 miles away from center Medina. Hence, from the Hadith, it's possible that Abu bakr is part of those behind Saalim during prayers in Masjid Quba, and does not disqualify him from being in the Cave with prophet Muhammad (SAW) Allah know best.

According to your explanation ( Baba Shia) you are telling us Abubakr and Umar are part of the Ansaar. May Allah guide you to Sunnah

Ọgbẹni Talihat, the chain of the two Hadith are not the same. Check the chain of the Hadith 692 حدثنا إبراهيم بب المنر and 7175 عثمان بن صالح حدثنا عبد الله بن وهب...... Why?

Hadith kan naa ko alfa yi, yio dawa pada tori o fee so nipa igba ti anobi de ati igba ti anobi o tii de ni. Se bi iwo jaan po, ti alfa naa ba jaan po, iyen o kinse tuntun

حَدَّثَنَا مُحَمَّدُ بْنُ سِنَانٍ، حَدَّثَنَا هَمَّامٌ، عَنْ ثَابِتٍ، عَنْ أَنَسٍ، عَنْ أَبِي بَكْرٍ ـ رضى الله عنه ـ قَالَ قُلْتُ لِلنَّبِيِّ صلى الله عليه وسلم وَأَنَا فِي الْغَارِ لَوْ أَنَّ أَحَدَهُمْ نَظَرَ تَحْتَ قَدَمَيْهِ لأَبْصَرَنَا‏.‏ فَقَالَ ‏ "‏ مَا ظَنُّكَ يَا أَبَا بَكْرٍ بِاثْنَيْنِ اللَّهُ ثَالِثُهُمَا ‏"‏‏.‏ Narrated Abu Bakr: I said to the Prophet (ﷺ) while I was in the Cave. "If any of them should look under his feet, he would see us." He said, "O Abu Bakr! What do you think of two (persons) the third of whom is Allah?" Sahih al-Bukhari 3653

@OGMLTV

13 күн бұрын

Jazaakum Allahu Khayran Eje ki ọgbẹni Talihat o salaye

Who are you referring to as your *Eyin Ọmọ iya wa ninu esin islam?*

You don't need to challenge the Sheiks especially Sheik Abdullah Jabata because his refutation on Habeeb markas is enough for refuting you as well for whatever has the knowledge of the science of hadith or has a reasonable mind but how many people in our society know this science!!!? Moreover,as for those that are saying kudos to you .They are saying that because they don't have the knowledge of hadith or they don't have a reasonable mind (if they have listened to the aforementioned refutation.

I've been expecting Alfa Toluat response ! He has styles and good moral standards regardless of been a Shia. This could win him converts as against the other side. It seems they're trying to cover certain things wc mudir n co are saying those things are better reviewed, rejected bc it's known even by non Muslims (?) Alfa Toliat, i want a shia but not zakyzaky type that challenges bomb with local catapult

@kitabullahwaitratiytv2241

Ай бұрын

@adebayofataiadetunji6257 May Allah accept it as an act of ibaadah from us together my honourable sheikh. Let's chat on WhatsApp, this is my WhatsApp number 👇👇: 09919367589. Jazakumullah khaeran Sir and my regards to everyone

@sharofolaoye3967

Ай бұрын

May Allah rectify your affairs o. Shia are full of wrong ideologies. Practice your religion by following the prophet Muhammad with the understanding of the sohaaba. This Toliah's claims are mere misconceptions. Don't buy the ideas. Stay away from Shia

@abass-giwamukhtar7826

Ай бұрын

Lol.. Go join them nah and start cursing the Sohabahs too. I pity your Qiyamoh

Oro eyin shia ti ye mi,e ma da wahala sile,te ba need ero,e pe ero yin lai ni.bu Umar Abubakr,Aisha ati bebe lo,se e fe ero ni,e ma ba ara yin je,e beru ALLAH

And this one get cool face and still dey on abosi

Brother don't stress your self we have known your goals you will just be deceiving peoples with your Empty knowledge it's not you that said prophet muhammed saw don't said we should be breaking fasting when sun set that it's 15mint after 7 even you shia breaking fasting after solat ishai seen knowledge The you want to prove that you have knowledge pass them why can't you contact them for debates if you ready to prove your secret knowledge

Why cant the salafist accept that sohir Buhari has a lot of contradictions .?We should stop blaming shia for everything.

@user-pq3ss2vl6k

Ай бұрын

No contradiction in the Hadith at all The is talking about the same thing Thanks for the explanation sheikh

@sharofolaoye3967

Ай бұрын

Salafiyyah can't accept a baseless claim of contradiction in Sohehu l-Bukhariy. This Shia - Toliah or what is his name self didn't present true picture of Imam Al-Bukhariy because of his own wrong ideology. The hadiths are two separate narrations from the same companion but with its two different chains (Isnaad). Imaam Al-Bukhariy didn't cut Hadith has against his claim. It's only those who have true guidance that can understand the truth. Taliat, may almighty Allah guide you to His true path. Shia don't have regards for sohaaba. Look at how Toliah is dogging saying Rodiyallohu Ani Abi Bakri and the likes

@issajimoh2701

Ай бұрын

​@@user-pq3ss2vl6kwhat do you mean by no contradiction is Sohihu Bukhari, Wallahi iro lo npa. There are lots of contradiction, lots of rubbish senseless, fabricated Hadiths in Sohihu Bukhari and other books of hadiths

@AdebowaleTV

Ай бұрын

@@issajimoh2701 You can not won them if you argue with them from today till tomorrow they will not accept what you bring as an evidence. Did you see how those their scholar use to lie and they call it shia. May Allah continue to bless Sheik Habeeb he have open everybody eyes this salafi people can lie for Africa

@issajimoh2701

Ай бұрын

@@AdebowaleTV Ma Sha Allah, Almighty Allah has used Sheik Muhammad Habeebullahi Adam Abdullahi Al-ilory to opened our eyes and mind . Now we know right from left, we can differentiate the authentic Islamic doctrines with fabricated ones Alihamdulillahi

This Alfa is salafi lecturer🤣🤣

@issajimoh2701

Ай бұрын

Yes ooooo ❤

@AdebowaleTV

Ай бұрын

I swear this man is knowledge enough to tackle those salafi lies. They can lie for africa they will see the evidence inside sohih bukhari and still deny it.

@issajimoh2701

Ай бұрын

@@AdebowaleTV my dear brother, wallahi you are very correct, they always claim to be master of hadiths but it's always sounds funny seen scholar's lecturing them on hadiths but their problem is that, they can deny for Africa. I don't know why they always denied hadiths in Sohihu Bukhari bcos it's doesn't favor their doctrines, though we've known them that they don't beliefs much in Quran like Hadiths but why denying hadiths now Awon oniro Sunnah

I think you want to mislead the people who are yet to understand the deen properly. The Hadith 7175 did not mention that Saalim was leading them in prayer before the prophet صلي الله عليه وسلم got to Madina.The Hadith is general and there no mention of when Saalim was leading the companions in saolah.What is your problem with Abubakri رضي الله عنه . Can you give one instance where the prophet صلي الله عليه وسلم praise Ali رضي الله عنه over Abu Bakri رضي الله عنه

@user-zu8kj5uf7f

15 күн бұрын

Vraiment mon frère ??

So you have not seen this Hadith in Sahih Al Bukhari: 3653 حَدَّثَنَا مُحَمَّدُ بْنُ سِنَانٍ، حَدَّثَنَا هَمَّامٌ، عَنْ ثَابِتٍ، عَنْ أَنَسٍ، *عَنْ أَبِي بَكْرٍ* ـ رضى الله عنه ـ قَالَ *قُلْتُ لِلنَّبِيِّ* صلى الله عليه وسلم *وَأَنَا فِي الْغَارِ* لَوْ أَنَّ أَحَدَهُمْ نَظَرَ تَحْتَ قَدَمَيْهِ لأَبْصَرَنَا‏.‏ *فَقَالَ* ‏ "‏ مَا ظَنُّكَ *يَا أَبَا بَكْرٍ* بِاثْنَيْنِ اللَّهُ ثَالِثُهُمَا ‏"‏‏.‏ *Narrated Abu Bakr*: I said to the Prophet (ﷺ) *while I was in the Cave.* "If any of them should look under his feet, he would see us." *He said, "O Abu Bakr!* What do you think of two (persons) the third of whom is Allah?" *Sahih al-Bukhari 3653*

@OGMLTV

13 күн бұрын

Let Ọgbẹni Taliah explain this hadith

Another lost soul with knowledge.

Rubbish!!! You are challenging salafiyoon with this your falsified claims. The hadiths are two separate occasions on a particular imam - Saalim - Rodiyallohu An'hu. Bukhari didn't cut the hadiths as you claim and that shows your ignorance of Hadith. Don't you see that each of the hadiths have its own isnad!? May Allah guide you aright.

@issajimoh2701

Ай бұрын

If someone is not an hypocrite, those hadiths are explanatory enough to understand that they are saying the same thing. Pelu ogo Olohun hadiths yin ti e gboju le yen , ni won ma fi tako yin lori gbogbo iro yin

@sharofolaoye3967

Ай бұрын

@@issajimoh2701 don't just accept the claims of Taliat blindly. Do your research to know the truth. Check Hadith 3653 in Bukhari or 2381 in Muslim and call yourself to order

@abdullahpopoola8380

Ай бұрын

U salafis are d hypocrites of the highest order

Shia too want to talk about who is the cave. They actually pioneered the clam that Abu Bakr was not the one in the cave, reason is simple you hate him and other eminent companions so much that you have dhikr to beseech curse on them. And the claims of gullible people like Mudir of fitnah and you talking is not something new. And to sum it up, you need to tell people the real aqeedah of shia and including your grave worshipping. Don't deny it, their enough evidence. Radarada better people dey talk Shia too dey talk. And for the Sufist that as no clue about shia, be prepared for Kawarij and other crazy sect.

@rafiuayinde9565

Ай бұрын

Don't mind him enemies of Abu bakir and Aisha rodiyallahu Aneehumo

@olayinkasaka8511

Ай бұрын

Have you listened to the Sheikh's piece above at all???

@abdullahpopoola8380

Ай бұрын

U are the real semblance of khawarij

Mudir marikaz has been saying that Hadith Bukhari has many contradictions instead of all young salaffiyat and Al -sunnah should come together to critical review it whilst this Shia schoolar show on the screen what he was reading but Abu sufyah, Ahmeed Yusuf will never show what they are reading except to condermed especially Abu sufyah who ignorantly noticed sheikh Adam Abdullah Ilory (Abu sufyah I hates you totally-oloriburuku)where are your father when sheikh Adam is on top ?who liberated knowledge and Islamic science in yoruba community. It's now you can see sheikh Adam Abdullah faulty (omo Ale)

@issajimoh2701

Ай бұрын

Good response, those ahlu Sunnah can defend fake/fabricated Hadiths against Quran bcos their brain has be cage. That guy Abu Sufyan is a very useless and senseless guy

@user-oz6qb9vs3o

Ай бұрын

There is no single contradiction in Sahih Al Bukhaari. It has been reviewed by scholars of the past and the modern scholars

@user-oz6qb9vs3o

Ай бұрын

Check out this Hadith: حَدَّثَنَا مُحَمَّدُ بْنُ سِنَانٍ، حَدَّثَنَا هَمَّامٌ، عَنْ ثَابِتٍ، عَنْ أَنَسٍ، *عَنْ أَبِي بَكْرٍ* ـ رضى الله عنه ـ قَالَ *قُلْتُ لِلنَّبِيِّ* صلى الله عليه وسلم *وَأَنَا فِي الْغَارِ* لَوْ أَنَّ أَحَدَهُمْ نَظَرَ تَحْتَ قَدَمَيْهِ لأَبْصَرَنَا‏.‏ *فَقَالَ* ‏ "‏ مَا ظَنُّكَ *يَا أَبَا بَكْرٍ* بِاثْنَيْنِ اللَّهُ ثَالِثُهُمَا ‏"‏‏.‏ *Narrated Abu Bakr*: I said to the Prophet (ﷺ) *while I was in the Cave.* "If any of them should look under his feet, he would see us." *He said, "O Abu Bakr!* What do you think of two (persons) the third of whom is Allah?" *Sahih al-Bukhari 3653*

@lekmur85

10 күн бұрын

Qur'an is the only book that doesn't contradiction.

@issajimoh2701

10 күн бұрын

@@user-oz6qb9vs3o you say what ? Echo echo pls ? There are more than 101 contradiction in Sohihu Bukhari like Those contradicting each other Those contradicting Qur'an Those contradicting Islamic teaching Those tarnishing the prophet images Those tarnishing image of Islam etc

You Shia, Mudeeru Ashairo and the Sufis are all birds of the same feather. May Allah guide you all aright. If you are claiming that Abu Bakri is not the one in the Gaar with the prophet with all this your misinterpretation of the authentic hadiths, what do you want to say on the hadith 3653 in the same Bukhari which is also reported by Muslim in 2381 that clearly stated that Abu Bakri was in the Gaar with the holy prophet.

@abdullahpopoola8380

Ай бұрын

Simple! If Abu bakr was with d Prophet in d cafe, then he was a MUNAFIQ.