Love all those power adjustments on landing!

@yukonstriker1703

4 ай бұрын

....and the SMASH hard landing 😂

@frtguy80

4 ай бұрын

@@yukonstriker1703 Yes! i dont think i have ever been on a 767 that the landing was actually smooth, they all seem like they smash em down, i dont know if its the way the gear is positioned or what.

Lovely trip report.

Cf6 is up there with the best sounding engines in my opinion. Especially the startup during takeoff

@darrenjohnson4420

8 ай бұрын

They all sound good IMO CF6-80C, GE90, Trent 800 and 1000 are my top 4

That engine cowling has seen much better days…

Love the condensation on the wing and engine

I'm afraid I have to deduct marks for you missing the beginning of the start-up sequence, of the CF6 engine on your side. You came to realise it was starting up, due to the sound of it burning fuel. Other than that, awesome video.

i don't know why i think 767's engine sounds when taking off sounds like screaming

I run these on the ground for power generation (LM6000)

Classic take off views out of Dulles on UA 767

They mainly use pw4000s for their 767s

@BX60-05

7 ай бұрын

only for the -300 series.

CF6 on a United 767? Rare

@fly-navy

8 ай бұрын

Only engine offered on the -400

@frtguy80

8 ай бұрын

its a 400 thats why

@Roboseal2

8 ай бұрын

but why? The PW4000 makes just as much thrust... @fly-navy @@frtguy80

@jeremyhilton3005

6 ай бұрын

​@@Roboseal2it is because these 400's were obtained in the merger with Continental. They were not originally ordered by the old United. United probably buys p&w, otherwise

@Roboseal2

6 ай бұрын

I now know the real answer. Pratt never opted to engineer a higher thrust engine for the 767-400 which was a smart move because the 767-400 did not sell well.@@jeremyhilton3005