Realy I like this video its so so interestyng

@Space30MINUTES

5 күн бұрын

Thank you very much for your feedback.

We don't even know if the universe had a beginning. Sure, big bang most likely happened, but it possible that within infinite space, infinite many big bangs happen, all the time. We simply don't know. But what we do know is that the "now" is eternal, regardless of the condition of the "now" at any point in time. And this brings me to a story I was told as a child. It is the story of the bird "wunderbar". Here is an English translation of the German original: "A tale is told of a distant land, Where the world’s biggest mountain of diamond does grandly stand. Every hundred years, with a magical flight, A wondrous bird comes into sight. It sharpens its beak on the stone's gleaming face, Two or three times, then leaves the place, Returns to its home, where it always stays, And comes back after a hundred years. It does this routine, on and on, Until the mountain is entirely gone. When this time has finally passed, The first second of eternity has elapsed." Now, try to wrap your head around this, because if if eternity is real, and how can it not be, than even this amount of time that it takes for this mountain to disappear surely takes trillions upon trillions of Googleplex years. But even that unimaginable time frame is nothing compare to eternity. And looking at the universe with that mindset, it is easier to comprehend that that it might have taken infinite many big bangs, until finally one of them created a universe so fine tuned, by sheer chance, that allowed us to emerge. Which brings me to another puzzle. But for that it's too late, my bed is calling me :)

@Space30MINUTES

25 күн бұрын

Thank you for sharing such profound thoughts. It's always inspiring to see viewers engaging with the deeper aspects of the content. Your perspective adds a whole new dimension to the discussion.

Yeah forsure, matter just exploded and positioned everything perfectly for human life on earth, and formed all of our DNA down to the most perfect percentages for humans to exist….. the fact that people think/accept that the “big bang” is what created life and the universe is beyond me.

@m.k.wallner3145

25 күн бұрын

Think in broader terms. Most likely, infinite many big bangs happened before, through sheer chance (and infinite many big bangs), one that supports life emerged.

@cliftongaither6642

23 күн бұрын

​@@m.k.wallner3145the big bang was not the beginning of life. the two have absolutely nothing in common. try reading an actual science book instead of your holy book.

We've spent almost a century to find Dark Matter and Dark Energy but still there's no sign of them. No matter what we try, a thing which doesn't exist can't be found. May be it is time to find an Alternative Way to Explain Dark Matter and Dark Energy. 4-D Hypershere model of Universe can easily explain Dark Matter, Dark Energy, Void and even the reason why the measurement values of Expansion Rate are around 70 km/sec-Mpc. Dark Matter, Dark Energy, Gravity, Void and Antigravity, ... all these are same phenomena. They just look different. I agree to the idea that the interaction between mass and space must be explained with quantum mechanics. But that doesn't mean gravity is the QM phenomena. That's because gravity is not a force. Dark Matter, Dark Energy, Gravity, Antigravity, Void... all these are just joint effects of the expansion of the Universe and the curvature of spacetime. Details are given below. Einstein’s theory of General Relativity states that spacetime is curved by the presence of mass. This curvature influences the motion other objects with mass and gives rise to gravitation. Thus, gravity is a result of geometric features in spacetime. However, we also observe gravitational effects - curvature of spacetime - in areas without any detectable mass. This has given rise to the concept of dark matter, which is matter that does not interact in any detectable way with normal matter, except through gravity. So, there is some large quantity of dark matter scattered throughout the universe, which curves spacetime and causes gravitational effects just like normal matter, but we cannot see or detect it with any known method. An alternative theory to the identity of dark matter is proposed - it is not matter at all, but rather an intrinsic curvature of spacetime. In other words, spacetime is not naturally flat. Even in the absence of matter, we observe some inherent curvature of spacetime. So, the question is now - why is spacetime naturally curved? Why is it not flat in the absence of mass? The universe is 4-dimensional, with 3 spatial dimensions and one dimension in time. Rather than consider time as a linear dimension, we can consider it as a radial one. Therefore, rather than describing the universe with a Cartesian coordinate system, we describe it with a 4-dimensional spherical coordinate system - 3 angular coordinates, φ1, φ2, φ3, and one radial coordinate in time, t. We live on the 3-dimensional surface of a 4-dimensional bubble which is expanding radially in time. Thus, the Big Bang represents t=0, the beginning of time. The crucial point is that the expansion of the universe is not homogeneous in all directions. The expansion rate at one point on the bubble’s surface may differ slightly from another point near it. The universe is only roughly spherical in 4 dimensions, the same way that the Earth is only roughly spherical in 3 dimensions. The same way we observe local mountains and valleys on the surface of Earth, we observe local “mountains” and “valleys” on the surface of the universe bubble. The inhomogeneity of the expansion of the universe has given rise to natural curvature of spacetime. This natural curvature causes the phenomenon of “dark matter”. “Valleys” in spacetime pull matter in, similarly to the warping of spacetime of massive objects. So “dark matter” is really “valleys” in spacetime that are expanding slower than the regions surrounding it. These valleys tend to pull matter in and create planets, stars, and galaxies - regions of space with higher-than-average densities of mass. Conversely, “mountains” in spacetime will repel matter away, an “anti-gravitational” effect, which gives rise to cosmic voids in space where we observe no matter. Each point on the surface of the universe bubble traces out a time arrow in 4-dimensional space, perpendicular to the surface. These time arrows are not parallel to each other since the universe is not flat. This causes points to have nonzero relative velocity away from each other. It is generally accepted that the universe is expanding faster than observable energy can explain, and this is expansion is believe to be still accelerating. The “missing” energy required to explain these observations has given rise to the theory of dark energy. The time dilation caused by non-parallel time arrows can be proposed as an explanation for dark energy. Alternatively, dark energy is real energy coming from potential energy gradients caused by non-parallel time arrows. As a sanity check, we can calculate the expansion rate of the universe based on the universe bubble model. Since the radius of the universe bubble is expanding at the speed of light in the time direction, it increases at 1 light second per second. Therefore, the “circumference” of the 3-dimensional surface increases by 2π light seconds per second, or about 1.88*10^6 km/s. This expansion is distributed equally across the 3-dimensional surface, so the actual observed expansion rate is proportional to the distance from the observer. At present, the age of the universe is estimated to be 13.8 billion years, so the radius of the universe bubble is 13.8 billion light years, or about 4233 megaparsecs (3.26 million light years to 1 Mpc). Thus, we can calculate the expansion rate of the universe, per megaparsec from the observer, as: Expansion rate = ((d(circumference))/dt)/radiusofuniverse=(1.88*〖10〗^6 km⁄s)/(2π*4233Mpc)=(1.88*〖10〗^6 km⁄s)/26598Mpc=70.82(km⁄s)/Mpc The popularly accepted empirical expansion rate is 73.5 +/- 2.5 km/s/Mpc, so our calculated value is close. There may be some additional source of expansion (or observed red shift) to make up for the discrepancy. For example, if two adjacent points have some gravitational gradient due to non-parallel time arrows, then light passing through these points will be red-shifted. - Cited from www.academia.edu/82481487/Title_Alternative_Explanation_of_Dark_Matter_and_Dark_Energy

@Space30MINUTES

17 күн бұрын

Thank you for sharing your insightful and interesting thoughts on Dark Matter and Dark Energy! We invite you to watch new videos to discover more about modern universe models and groundbreaking scientific hypotheses.

@michaelkahn8744

17 күн бұрын

@@Space30MINUTES Thank you!

Who creates it? Nobody.

@Space30MINUTES

25 күн бұрын

That's right. No one can create the universe. All are just predicted by evidence verified from science and technology. Thanks for your sharing. Wish you a good day with your family. Do not forget to click like and share for everyone and register the channel to watch the latest videos.

Wrong question, "what created or how did the universe form" is more appropriate. Using "who" means first to have to provide evidence that a "who" exists that has the ability to create something. Positing a god or creator has no answering value but rather just presents an even greater mystery, where did this god come from and how could we possibly know that? Old Bronze Age books of mythology aren't applicable.

@Space30MINUTES

27 күн бұрын

Thank you for sharing. It is true that the question "what or how did the universe come into being" is more scientifically relevant. Assuming a creator raises many complex questions. Mythological books have cultural value but do not apply to modern science. Space 30 Minutes will try to provide better perspectives in the future. Once again, thank you for your support.

Circular logic, stupid.

@Space30MINUTES

20 күн бұрын

Where do you find it stupid? Can you explain to me? Thank you very much if you provide it.

God made the universe,read .Read Genisis.

@johnlawrence7386

27 күн бұрын

Who made God?

@Space30MINUTES

27 күн бұрын

Thank you for sharing ideas. The idea that God created the universe is an important religious belief for many people. To continue discussing these interesting topics, subscribe to our channel!

@junekazama4578

26 күн бұрын

I don't read fairy tales.

@m.k.wallner3145

25 күн бұрын

If god made the universe, then who made god? You cannot explain complexity by claiming something even more complex "created" it.

@cliftongaither6642

23 күн бұрын

​@@m.k.wallner3145 some find that the easiest answer is a god, you know, 'cause thinking is hard.