As long as it keeps troops safe and does its job, I'm fine with the project.

@VanderlyndenJengold

7 ай бұрын

Even though it's late and cost so much?

@dc-4ever201

7 ай бұрын

​@@VanderlyndenJengoldThe additional costs to fix have been absorbed by General Dynamics Land Systems as it was them who said they could do everything the MoD wanted as such it is only over time not budget as they had to fix and redesign some parts.

The title should be 'Under the bonnet'. The vehicle isn't wearing a coat.

Since when did British people use the expression 'hood' in that context?

@theriddler6994

7 ай бұрын

Britain is no longer british. Its 2023 bigot

@gb9065

7 ай бұрын

They do in the context of tanks...

@liveuk

7 ай бұрын

Fish like tanks, what of it? Grow up

@johnnunn8688

7 ай бұрын

Since never.

@DEFarnes

7 ай бұрын

Also we don't see what is under the hood or bonnet.

I love the 40mm cannon. Lots of firepower. And those sensors are very useful. I like how the storage bins act as RPG stand off armour.

@VanderlyndenJengold

7 ай бұрын

Do you really love it's 40 mm cannon?

@Gareth04100

7 ай бұрын

​@@VanderlyndenJengold... people in the know... Absolutely do not love the cannon... POS...

@CraigTheBrute-yf7no

6 ай бұрын

RPGs are actually even more deadly with some standoff

@will.s4611

4 ай бұрын

should of had the bush master but our MOD knows the best way to waste £5billion

Everybody forgets to mention that Ajax is completely amphibious it’s more than capable to cross rivers

Looks great, but I'm surprised there's no mention of any anti-drone capabilities, considering we now know they present a major vulnerability to all armoured vehicles.

@DavidKnowles0

6 ай бұрын

Same here.

@Andrew-Lee91

6 ай бұрын

From what I have heard and learnwd so far the microphone can pick up drone noise too. And incoming tracking lasers from drones can be detected as well.

@valriis9745

2 ай бұрын

Probably can be retrofitted depending on what sort of threat you consider defending against. Russians already have jamming pods pointing straight up on the roof of some of the tanks so if you hover directly over such a tank you might lose connection. Those ones will most likely be added to every future armored vehicle adversary or british. Fpvs are hard to beat as human pilots will probably aim at any weakness. known

Glad they got it together.

A scout vehicle the size of a main battle tank

@nikoc8968

7 ай бұрын

i dont think size matters much at 1000+ meters...

@MrWorldwide00

7 ай бұрын

bigger size means bigger weight, reduced capability to cross bridges, reduced speeds, lack of transportability, worse fuel consumption. also bigger target to hit@@nikoc8968

@davidhouseman4328

7 ай бұрын

Ultimately, Yes. Genuinely covert is people, scouting is having all the tech to see.

Having (mis)spent most of the eighties developing instruments to measure and analyse sound, I'm glad to see military equipment _finally_ recognising the possibilities of the acoustic spectrum for passive warning and even identification/location/tracking of threats. Up to now, this sort of thing was only of military interest if it worked underwater! Let's just say that duplicating, in 2010 and for a hydrophone, what I'd done in 1989 for microphones on handheld instruments, arousing no MoD or MI5 interest whatsoever, was suddenly classified!

@mikaluostarinen4858

7 ай бұрын

Detection of drones will be crucial for vehicles and other valuable devices. Acoustic signal detection would be good since it's passive. Every drone has probably a specific acoustic signature, and there will be some seconds for countermeasures.

@Gareth04100

7 ай бұрын

You guys misunderstand... This is Thales' version of Boomerang. That saw service decades ago

About time this tank joins the army

Fixed the vibration issues then?

@fraserfulton.1432

7 ай бұрын

Yes 👍

@mitchrils

7 ай бұрын

@@fraserfulton.1432 Any idea what was causing it and how it was fixed?

@matthewspencer972

7 ай бұрын

@@mitchrils What I was never able to figure out, was how they managed to have the problems in the first place! All the necessary vibration and noise measurement and analysis technology was available, in the civilian market, in the mid eighties. Could it be that the defence industry just didn't know it existed because they assumed that anything cutting-edge must have been invented by the defence industry?

@davidhouseman4328

7 ай бұрын

​@@mitchrilsfrom what I heard they sufficiently mitigated it. Its not a yes/no situation but how bad.

@darrensteele7880

7 ай бұрын

​@mitchrils sort of fixed with extra sound deadening in the ear muffs and new seat mounts . 🫡

I'm asuming all the vibration issues where ironed out and this vechile is ready to go. I think an APS system though needs to be installed and some sort of protection agianst drones.

BV’s included?

brilliant idea putting the latches on the bottom of the storage bins like lol

@randommadness1021

7 ай бұрын

Even act as a table now. Woo hoo.

Does it have a boiling vessel

Scimitar till uncontested as the coolest reconnaissance vehicle. ❤

@jacob-lf4id

6 ай бұрын

im sorry but ajax looks 10/10 more sexy and scarier

Its a very expensive vehicle looking like there is little to no drone defence needed for modern warfare. I hope they sort this out for our boys. Id like to see the british army running anti air defence support vehicles on excerises alongside ajax to protect it from the sky threat.

Should have bought CV90

@synchc

7 ай бұрын

We could've just kept the Warrior if that's what we needed. Both thirty year old IFVs with comparable arms and armour. There's nothing wrong with the Warrior from all I've heard. This is just the new beast with all the touch screens, modularity and threat sharing coms that modern militaries are going nuts for.

@nigelmacbug6678

7 ай бұрын

or tracked boxer, make a recon module, then have both tracked and wheeled recon vehicle the tracked boxer has access to all the other boxer modules. would also add 155 artillery module instead of archer system.

@syscoord195

7 ай бұрын

​@synchc warrior is absolutely dreadful, can't fire on the move, the chassis' are absolutely knackered, all the sights are 80's tech. Has poor protection compared to its peers and is unreliable as a 40 year old vehicle tends to be. Regardless, should have gone with cv90. This was a Spanish vehicle the mod slapped tons of armour on, had it built in Wales for some godforsaken reason and then were shocked when the thing caused more permanent injuries to blueforces than to an enemy it will likely not face.

@stuartvincent7360

7 ай бұрын

After all Ajax is just a Pizzaro / Ulan souped up

@davidhouseman4328

7 ай бұрын

​@@synchcAjax is a CVR(T) replacement not a warrior replacement. It's all about the scouting tech not moving people.

if that was in New Zealand it would have been "this is the public address system it allows us to play various hits like Paint it Black and other cool Vietnam era songs while on exorcise" LOL i certainly sounds like a beasty machine with a throaty engine and not very much track noise also compared to a lot of other tracked vehicles i have heard and driven.

@William12Evans

2 ай бұрын

😂well done kiwis 🇳🇿 from 🇬🇧

Been in HC since March, yet he has an opinion... what experience has he had to compare?

How many cup holders though.. ?

Will the armoured infantry have the version with the 40mm main gun, and is the chain gun mounted the right way round this tine

@TheRst2001

7 ай бұрын

The recon ajax is only one with 40mm . The Ares which is the troop carrier afv version will just have a 7.62 and a .50 cal machine gun

Is there any space for any personnel in the rear because I know some of the other variants such as Aries can hold 6 to 8 in the area and I was wondering if even with the Turret Ajax could hold around two to 4 also

@ultr7712

7 ай бұрын

Ajax is purely a recon vehicle in a similar vein to the M3 Bradley per se, so space for dismounts is filled with recon equipment instead.

2:05 how can that possibly hear anything other than the bag of spanners that seems to be rolling around in this

I hope it turns out top notch but the issues mean I'll wait to be convinced. Particularly as is has so little cross compatability.

Better late than never... It seems like a good platform overall. Even though the gun has proven effective in trials, it still looks a bit of a 'pea shooter' to me, compared to the actual size of the vehicle. However, I know looks can be deceiving sometimes, so only time will tell if it's: Ajax the Great or Ajax the Lesser... Let's hope it proves itself with good, tactical awareness to assist in the field, with the ability to dash from midfielder to striker, occasionally ⚽️ Atb Gus 👍

@ionfreak83

6 ай бұрын

I don't know why you call the 40mm a pea shooter since its four times the firepower of the 30mm they replaced. And 30mm more then doubles the firepower compare to the 25mm which is the current cannon use by the majority of western IFV. The cannon looks small by comparison to the vehicle because its uses telescopic case ammo and its the first and only one of its kind.

@gadgetgus

6 ай бұрын

@ionfreak83 I hear that. It's just as a traditional look, it seems a bit so... However, like I said, looks can be deceiving, and I look forward to Ajax proving herself in the future. Hopefully, it will be fitted with anti-drone/FPV measures. Atb Gus 👍

@peterwait641

6 ай бұрын

@@ionfreak83 Americans are getting 50 mm bushmaster lol

Can it run two BV's though???

Hope they think of drone protection thesd days

So they've actually got it to work properly then. Did the test crews manage to regain their hearing?

no coax mg?

How does it combat drone threat?

Beast, best in the world

Loving that 40 mm chain gun. But, is there really need for 6 different varients of AJAX? I see the need for, say, like 3.. GL ✌️

What is the role if Ajax if it is an APC why are an armoured regiment operating it?

Was that next generation when it was scheduled for delivery or years later now??? 🤔🙄

Look like the Centurion.

@johnnunn8688

7 ай бұрын

🤣😂🤣😂. Sorry, I shouldn’t laugh at a blind person.

@David-vi4ne

7 ай бұрын

I served with a centurion tank battalion. Just made me think of it. 😁

@Surv1ve_Thrive

3 ай бұрын

That's a good thing potentially. Cause confusion and intimidation. Like how panzer IVs were often mistaken for Tigers.

wait did he say 40mm ?

Actually it shows the army going for more of a fighting force, they didn't copy other western forces with having wheeled vehicles for the cavalry.

@zab6359

7 ай бұрын

But they do have wheeled cavalry they use the Jackal 2.

@notsomalicious4435

7 ай бұрын

Boxer?

@Markus117d

7 ай бұрын

Gone for both, Some tracked for difficult terrain, Some wheeled for less tricky terrain & relative cheapness reasons..

@al-azimahmed1188

7 ай бұрын

The have the Boxer, jacket and MRAP trucks

@davidhouseman4328

7 ай бұрын

They dropped Warrior LEP, relying on Boxer ...

I always thought Ajax was a bathroom cleaner

So thank you, Ajax spray and wipe.

Isn't this the huge disaster we have heard about? Have they got it working? Does it still rattle the crew's teeth out above 30 MPH?

It would be good to see how it compares to the German lynx 41 or the puma ifv. I think the Germans have greater internal volume looking at the dimensions.

@jonny2954

Ай бұрын

Lynx has similar internal volume to Ajax, Puma has much smaller since they maximised protection.

How many are being manufactured?

@KiingOfKombat

7 ай бұрын

489

@Ukbrummie

7 ай бұрын

@@KiingOfKombat nice, more then I expected

@Retrosicotte

7 ай бұрын

@@Ukbrummie He is incorrect, it's 589. 245 Turreted ones, 256 APC ones, 88 Engineering ones.

@deanrobinson4129

7 ай бұрын

​@Retrosicotte hope your correct but I wud think this number will be downgraded especially when you take into consideration the amount spent on this system already

@Retrosicotte

7 ай бұрын

@@deanrobinson4129 there is no indication it has been

Wheres the drone detector

Well .. I have 20+ years of armoured vehicle development experience and not "less than 9 months in the household Calvary" and I can tell you it's already obsolete just like it's requirement at conception.

@kuston1986

7 ай бұрын

cheers dits

@Gareth04100

7 ай бұрын

​@@kuston1986no worries Tom

@davidhouseman4328

7 ай бұрын

Tell us why, and you might be making a point?

@stephen7571

6 ай бұрын

You mean it’s not ahead of schedule and under budget?!?

Lot of exposed cables. I'm sure they're not for anything important though. Just laser warning systems and stuff.

Big jump from my old AFV 432... 😂

These videos on our current military hardware have always been strange to me… it’s like an advertisement for a car

@synchc

7 ай бұрын

...a car we've already paid for.

@dc-4ever201

7 ай бұрын

That weighs 47 tons 😂

@davidhouseman4328

7 ай бұрын

It is, we need to sell the military to the public, otherwise they disregard it. You hope insurance is a waste, but still get it, unfortunately the military needs selling to make sure we keep a good standard.

So it's not injuring people with noise and vibration anymore? I though it was for recon, not a IFV? A Scimitar replacement, not a Warrior one

@VanderlyndenJengold

7 ай бұрын

It's loads of things.

@dc-4ever201

7 ай бұрын

The noise thing looked like it was induction from the engine amplifying the communications headsets too much, they've put a dampener in line on the headsets to counter it. I'm guessing they sorted the vibration issue too.

@TheRst2001

7 ай бұрын

Correct the ajax is for proactive recon and protecting the flanks of a brigade and stuff, it carries zero troops . I always assumed the ajax was a warrior ifv replacement but its not and never has been 😅 hence reason warrior is being kept. The ajax Ares can carry about 6 to 8 soldiers so I guess it could be an AFV. I think I would possible prefer the ares as an ifv troop carrier but with an APS on top instead of cannon for better troop protection . It has 50 cal and 7.62 so still bad news at close range.

I hope it’s water proof unlike the prototype!!!!

Ajax, the vehicle it will never be! You know he is an officer when he says it is "an excellent piece of kit" when it has had nothing but problems from day one that still haven't been sorted out, it will never beat the Warrior overall. Plus you may aswell just hand over all the information on all military equipment etc to the enemy doing this!

@peterwait641

6 ай бұрын

Extra comfy cushions have fixed it !

Great vehicle need more soldiers

The Ajax AFV belongs to the Ascod family of vehicles in the United States the Ajax is called the M10 Booker. For the Ajax, it needs a 105mm version with a Ukrainian BMD parachute capability

@BritMemes

7 ай бұрын

It is a totally different vehicle the Ajax was designed and built in the UK by the European branch of general dynamics

@HayMaker-tv2dm

6 ай бұрын

No its not! Its just a face lift proud briton the Pride is always your downfall

@peterwait641

6 ай бұрын

@@BritMemes The rotting branch of the tree 🤣

Good luck maintaining this tech-heavy machine in the field. 😂

These will only be worthwhile if we have more than 148 tanks lol

@davidhouseman4328

7 ай бұрын

How, if you were in a fight and were offered zero armoured vehicles or only a few which would you choose?

@alangunningham5667

7 ай бұрын

@@davidhouseman4328 well if Poland can have well over 500 tanks and the UK is supposed a world leader .. I think having more than 500 tanks would at least be a little expected not the puny 148 tanks of a 25-year-old tanks that then have an upgrade !!

@davidhouseman4328

7 ай бұрын

@alangunningham5667 why would an island looking around the world be structured like a country directly bordering an adversary? Tanks do nothing to help our defence, they can help our allies, be so to subs and jets, and nukes. We have some tanks, but our limiting figure isn't the tanks we have, its the air and sea lift we have to to deploy and a sustain them.

@alangunningham5667

7 ай бұрын

@@davidhouseman4328 so you no longer want to discuss the comment and bring up something different ?...why not make a comment of your own?

@davidhouseman4328

7 ай бұрын

@alangunningham5667 I don't know how you came to that. But to go back to my initial objection to your post. A small amount helps, it is worthwhile, even if more would be better. Second an armoured vehicle is useful even without large numbers of MBTs. And to add, the British army wouldn't even be best improved with more MBTs, what its actually lacking is long range fires and air defences.

WHAAT? I can't hear you.

Now add this to war thunder

I though this got canned due to issue with noise, ride and other major issues......

@cjjk9142

7 ай бұрын

Too much put in to cancel

@dc-4ever201

7 ай бұрын

Guess they fixed it, they should have been more vocal with the causes and how they were fixed, so the public doesn't go on thinking our lads are having yet another sub standard piece if kit thrust upon them that will never get fixed or might do just as it leaves service in 30+ years.

@hudsonbear5038

7 ай бұрын

@@dc-4ever201 LOL we always had substandard kit so nothing new there!!!

@hudsonbear5038

7 ай бұрын

@@cjjk9142 Yeah thats about right.....

New ajax 7 insansız zırhlı lastik paletli araç üzerine 105mm tank topunu zırhlı kulesi entegre ettim 35mm 8namlulu makineli topunu e?ettim 1000kw lazer topunu entegre ettim insansı robot pilotlar kullanacak

Now find the money to build them

@fraserfulton.1432

7 ай бұрын

Already budgeted for so no problems 👍

@bossadave

7 ай бұрын

@@fraserfulton.1432 time will tell.

"An excellent bit of kit" great to hear that the soldiers have got great confidence in Ajax. It's superb.

Is it still making troops deaf?

@Markus117d

7 ай бұрын

Apparently not, According to the other video, AT least

@gg.youlubeatube6249

2 ай бұрын

What ? i cant hear ya.

If AI IS DOING THE SPELLING SACK IT

This is the vehicle that is years behind schedule and way over budget that deafens the occupants and vibrates so badly it injures the troops?

@KONAMAN100

7 ай бұрын

Yeah that's the one.

@peterwait641

6 ай бұрын

Its the David Cameron of the AFV world , all hot air but fails to live up standards !

Should send 10 or so of the AJAXES to the front in Ukraine to test out “The Kit”

0:18 not the best stabilised gun then.............

Why are european nations so anxious to develop individually their own weapon systems? It may be a fraction better, but becomes a weakness if nations have to cooperate, resulting in logistical nightmare. Everyboddy knows, yet it is ignored. Why? The military is there to defend and protect. It is not meant to satisfy ego's.

@K_-_-_-_K

7 ай бұрын

Good point. The ajax is pointless given the fact the cv90 is available for the same job.

@studentaviator3756

7 ай бұрын

Because if a country does not possess a miltary industrial complex they get shafted. The Canadian army doesn't get full access to its tanks, the Germans put limitations on what you can use or resell them too, and the Americans are extremely preditorial with their military industrial complex. I'm not crictisising either country defence is extremely important to a countries sovereignty but I am explaining why European countries are obsessed about this. Anyway it's ironic I'd support cv90 anyway it's actually owned by BAE

@studentaviator3756

7 ай бұрын

Furthermore, I'd say your model has to work both ways. Britain makes meteor before the us, the us years and years later adopts aim 260. Britain develops brimestone America decades later develops the inferior JAGM.Then forces the uk to buy it for their apache by refusing to let brimestone be integrated. So this bilaterialism has to work both ways.

@TheRst2001

7 ай бұрын

The uk has aligned boxer with germany and other nations and german industry Ajax aligned with usa Spain Austria and general dynamics . On the whole thats a good idea , however competition is healthy and war in ukraine has shown how advantageous it is to have many companies offering solutions and innovations

@TheFloorface

7 ай бұрын

developing and building military kit is not an overnight job. if you rely on another country for your hardware that gives them a huge amount of control over you. they can easily pull support leaving you utterly boned. building your own stuff also gives you the option to export it to other countries making you a lot of money and giving you the fore mentioned control. none of that is to say integration isnt an important factor worth thinking about but so is self reliance.

Whats the point in having these metal coffins when we would be wiped out by nukes...the days of tanks are over

*Across the globe, wars begin to spark, tensions rise....* *British Army* LETS TELL EVERYONE HOW OUR TANKS WORK!

@grantjohnstone9787

7 ай бұрын

They showed absolutely nothing that wasn't obvious from a quick look at the vehicle.

No tea cup holders?

@peterwicks9851

7 ай бұрын

I think the Troop Leader has a holder for his Sherry on the gun breech so's not to spill when going across country! 😊

Anything on it to deal with main battle tanks.Said No UK office dwelling civil serpents

@davidhouseman4328

7 ай бұрын

Yep, telling the airforce or artillery were where the MBT is.

Lucky for him it doesn't have a wolls woyce engine.... he'd be wuined.......like today's standards

Wasn't the SA80 best , hopefully not down the same route .

cough cough...cv90 is better

final thought - we will be speaking russian before this heap ever works properly!

Got an image of them trying to ‘keep the vehicle going’ with a sledge hammer now. . . Sounds like British engineering 😊

@untrust2033

7 ай бұрын

Part of the essential repair kit for every tracked vehicle since they were invented..... have to fix track pins somehow

@stuartrules456789

7 ай бұрын

The same British engineering that built bridges and rail ways all over the world that are still in use today yep.

@rgray83z

6 ай бұрын

@@stuartrules456789 I’m a British engineer, so allowed to make sarcastic comments about our industry ;) besides, we’re not quite at the level nationally we used to be. Take HS2 as a prime example.

@stuartrules456789

6 ай бұрын

@@rgray83z Very true sad to see, but Britain is far from bad engineers as most of the world like to make out, if not for the brits and its engineering/inventions we prob would be living in caves. Even recent things like the world wide web and graphene etc

Under the hood??? Cmon know your audience! We don’t use the term hood

James……nice effete public school boy…..perfect for the cavalry……

@Ukraineaissance2014

7 ай бұрын

Whereas you have achieved nothing in your life in comparison. And supporting russias invasion of various country's which want nothing to do with them doesnt count as an achievement, quite the opposite.

@mikewingert5521

7 ай бұрын

@@Ukraineaissance2014 24 years in the army. A 2434 from 1974 - 98…….James is just the usual mincer found in the Household Div….fact….🇬🇧

@jeanclaudejunior

7 ай бұрын

Is it time for you to say "Sorry" for being an anti-semitic white supremacist,@@mikewingert5521 ?

@johnnunn8688

7 ай бұрын

@@mikewingert5521, mincer seems a bit unnecessary, they do have a BV though.

@mikewingert5521

7 ай бұрын

@@johnnunn8688 The BV is for the lads….👍

Noisiest vehicle in the world.

@Retrosicotte

7 ай бұрын

Not even close

@fraserfulton.1432

7 ай бұрын

No I think Saturn 5 or possibly the space shuttle is the loudest vehicle in the world I don think a 40t AFV would even get close 🧐

@richardwarner3705

7 ай бұрын

@@fraserfulton.1432 This one does.

@richardwarner3705

7 ай бұрын

@@Retrosicotte Loudest "In the world" & universe.

@fraserfulton.1432

7 ай бұрын

@@richardwarner3705 Ok 😉

The public announcement system 😂 I wonder how many millions was wasted, on a glorified speaker. That will NEVER be used it combat 😉

@johnnunn8688

7 ай бұрын

It’s for the urban environment.

@fraserfulton.1432

7 ай бұрын

None , speaker was only a couple of hundred quid but I have to admire your grasp on what things cost , you must be getting constantly ripped off 😂😂😂😂😂

@Markus117d

7 ай бұрын

​@fraserfulton.1432 Also they don't grasp the speaker is intended for when the unit is on peacekeeping duties ect rather than in a combat situation. Although it could be useful if there's infantry accompanying them..

@davidhouseman4328

7 ай бұрын

It might actually be the most important part, the easiest battle is the one you don't have to fight.

@gg.youlubeatube6249

2 ай бұрын

This vehicle prime purpose is scare civilians, so the speaker is the main weapon. Vehicle is not created for war, or any intense situations.

we must be thick, who knew what a driver would do, armour for protecting the tracks, really! incoming laser threat, so we can fire our smoke grenades, honestly. Obviously, he has been told what to say, please

@peterwait641

6 ай бұрын

Modern anti tank weapons are top attack !

@gg.youlubeatube6249

2 ай бұрын

he just play the script. :D vehicle prime purpose is scare civilians, so the speaker is actually the main weapon. Vehicle is not created for combat, or any intense situations.

So if the built-in megaphone fails to disperse angry citizens I suppose that's when the stabilized 40mm chain-gun comes in handy? There is a mismatch between those 2 bits of kit. Almost seems like it was designed to be used in Gaza. Just being slightly critical because you can't use this for domestic policing, you're just asking for trouble if you use this against civilians.

@dc-4ever201

7 ай бұрын

We aren't deploying troops to Gaza, Israel manufacturers their own IFV's, so they aren't subject to wishy washy foreign politicians making deals then breaking them anymore and British troops have not been deployed against crowds since the creation of the Police Forces. So I fail to see relevance in anything you've said.

@emmajay4495

7 ай бұрын

did someone tell the Lieutenant it has a 40mm chain gun? or a 7.62mm chain gun and a 40mm CTA cannon haha.

@nikoc8968

7 ай бұрын

there will be citizens in urban operations. at least the megaphone gives you the ability to talk to them. yes, much like in Gaza...you just gave a great example of a situation where it could be used...

@davidhouseman4328

7 ай бұрын

Have you ever even read about wars? Some people fight, others don't, you have to deal with both.

@Sumi_S

6 ай бұрын

@@dc-4ever201America supply’s Isreal Isreal doesent make anything

The 40mm auto cannon is amazing and ofcourse the CT amunnition! But this soldier call the weapon system as a chain gun he thinks that all cannons are Orbital ATK chain gun cannons?! But the 40mm CTA cannon is not a chain gun is a diferent type of weapon even the feeding system is unique, he still have to learn what is using to battle

Hugely over budget and late into service. Problems with the crew being deafened. UK defence procurement at its finest. 👍

How funny nice new tank's but schools folling down an NHS falling apart 😂😂

@danbatesy5492

7 ай бұрын

Remember that when the military can’t defend you’re right to sleep good at night because they didn’t have the equipment/vehicles to fight off enemy’s.

@oldgreggscreamybaileys6618

7 ай бұрын

Yeah the military is massively underfunded as well, so no difference.

@Retrosicotte

7 ай бұрын

1 - It's not a tank 2 - Separate budgets 3 - They have a much smaller budget than either of the things you mentioned

@fraserfulton.1432

7 ай бұрын

Schools FALLING down are irrelevant if you don't attend them 👍

@TheMVCoho

7 ай бұрын

Its been said military already fell apart so....

The English word is Bonnet, not Hood. Let's please stop be Americanised.

Waffle,waffle,waffle whats that long pokey thing sound like and what does it do..