You'll be SHOCKED by the 12 FREE AI tools that are about to TRANSFORM academic research in 2024: kzread.info/dash/bejne/o3ZoqqmGptXOp6g.html

@chunnaiyamspo5062

Ай бұрын

PLEASE DO A VIDEO ON FULL PROFESSORS WHO TAKE FIRST-AUTHORSHIPS IN PHD STUDENTS' WORK. THIS IS A HUGE SCAM IN ACADEMIA AND RESEARCH WHICH IS TOTALLY HUSHED UP AND UNADDRESSED

For your next test use 4 papers: 1) AI generated, 2) human generated, 3) AI generated/AI rewritten, and 4) AI generated/human rewritten.

Originality is a scam, I'm not sure if you're promoting this tool or you have actually tested it. I copy text from books old papers long before Ai trend most of them were labeled as Ai generated content.

@shaneegan7354

Ай бұрын

Absolutely. My own original writing from 10 years ago are flagged as 88% AI.

@jerichodejesus3047

Ай бұрын

I agree with you, all of my paper always flagged as ai even i use the best ai humanizer called Undetectable AI

@christosandreev6392

Ай бұрын

​@@shaneegan7354had the exact same experience. Pasted my Masters thesis from 2017 before any LLM existed for this matter. It flagged it as 80% AI

@h.z1793

Ай бұрын

​@@shaneegan7354 I know right. Like I don't understand how do we supposed to have a good writing if all the good words are flagged as ai? Do we have to use stupid words to make us look stupid for it to not be detectable as ai?

@elzoemalku4598

Ай бұрын

absolutely ....👌

Thanks for this video. Love watching your videos!

00:38 🔍 Turnitin, Originality, and gp0 are tools used for AI content detection. 01:18 💡 Originality was the best at detecting AI content compared to Turnitin and gp0. 04:44 🛡 Undetectable and Fasley were the best at bypassing AI content detection tools. 06:19 💬 Bypass AI was able to fool Turnitin but failed to pass Originality detection. 07:17 👀 Originality was the most effective tool at detecting AI-generated content despite bypass attempts.

Bro, you dropping bombs. Thank you.

The likelihood of misclassification remains high for non-native English speakers/writers who use AI tools to improve fluency of their documents. That being said, wouldn't it be fun to have a tool that once applied to older texts would show how many of them were written by enslaved research assistants while signed by the big guns of the dept ? So, why is AI generated text such a scandal whereas assistants generated work has not been so for decades

@imthinkingthoughts

Ай бұрын

yep, nailed it with this one

@TheBoostedDoge

5 күн бұрын

"provides assistants, secretaries, interns, etc with valuable work experience" - Some old dude who gave a lecture at my previous workplace

Hi, I'm the creator of StealthWriter, I want to point something out, although all some of the tools claim to bypass all AI detectors, you need to also take into account the quality of the text generated from these tools, there are many tools that claim to provide undetectable content but the output is just gibberish unreadable content. It would be a good idea to create an unbiased video comparing these tools in readability also and not only the undetectability scores. This is what we focused on the most when we created StealthWriter.

Wonder what's wrong with using AI for academic writing. the goal of a research paper is to find something new, not to write something new.

@nicholasojoduwaodibor4865

Ай бұрын

I love this response ❤😂

@petergee5622

28 күн бұрын

If the use is acknowledged by a researcher, then maybe yes, but as the video focuses on how to avoid detection, the aim is clearly not to be open and honest. This is opposite of academic integrity.

@ryanbailey5709

9 күн бұрын

Because human beings shouldn't outsource their minds to technology.

I dont mean to be a partypooper here Andy but i follow you because of your excellent content about the hard (and sometimes funny) truths about research and academia, and the occassional tips and tricks for productivity from a veteran researcher who saw the light. But of late most if not all the content is about flashy new AI tools. Having tried some of them, it's (a) overwhelming because there are SO MANY and i cant really make sense of whats good; (b) the generative AI's mostly feel unfit for research no matter how good they are today, simply because they do not seem up to the mark and more often than not are like an overconfident student likely to lack nuance. I get that a guys got to eat, and nothing against honest endorsements or even promotional content honestly, but id love to see some of your old content back as well - even the stories were hilarious. Maybe you do put them out but i only get notifs for the videos about the tools. Ps im a nobody here, so you can take this opinion with a grain of salt.

Andy great video just a small note: It doesn't "know that you're AI". It predicts that there is an x% of being written by AI. It's not like plagiarism where you compare text to text. AI detection is just a prediction and nothing more.

Hi Andy, the turnitin that you are using is the normal turnitin or the turnitin AI? if im not mistaken, turnitin has turnitin ai version.

Andy, can we use a conversational tone instead of an educational one in any research paper?

Hi Andy. Great content! But please do more content on PhD and postdoc research. especially on some supervisors who take all credit, e.g., there are many supervisors who take first author even if the majority work is done by the student etc etc

I'm missing one test: priming Claude by training it to write in your own style via analysing your old texts.

@astafzciba

Ай бұрын

i tried it originality ai was able to detect it

I wrote feedback to my student for submitting his dissertation, I tested my feedback in turnitin. It was detected 40% AI. I was really surprised as 90% of my writing was in first person form with my suggestions how to improve some aspects in the dissertation. Therefore I don’t trust Turnitin in detecting AI.

@Go-Big-Red

Ай бұрын

shocked

I wish I could like this twice, hat off for the dedication

How good is originality of confirming that content is NOT AI when it is indeed human generated? One tool you showed in the past detected everything as AI.

You write with ChatGPT, edit it, and then use a humaniser only on the parts that the detector complains about.

Good insight. Wondering Ouriginality assumes by default the submitted content is AI generated?

Thanks a lot, which scan level of originality? Standard 2.0 or Turbo 3.0?

Hi Andy, can you make a video comparing DSc & PhD there seems to be very little or vague info on this on the internet

Hix is funny. It completely changes the context with its grammatical errors, adding context changing words.

How is originality at confirming that NOT AI is NOT AI? The last time you did a tool like this it detected everything as AI including my pre AI paper.

Originality states on their website that it is not suitable for testing academic works because it will often have false positives. I would assume since Turnitin is used by thousands of Universities they error on the side of it being human since 100% AI detection accuracy is basically impossible.

Originality is not intended for academic writing as they clarify this on their website.

great video, try Conch AI too :P

Sir, I am not shocked, but pretty interesting. 😀

OMG! So there's AI services to convert AI generated content and make it NOT look AI to University AI detectors! OMG. My head is reeling at this........

@klam77

Ай бұрын

Have Neri Oxman, Claudine Gay, Francesca Gino heard of these services? OMG.

How did Bro get access to Turnitin?

Was the originality ai detection on their standard 2.0 or 3.0?

I believe in the power of AI as a research tool … but that’s all it is. A tool. I’m all for a hybrid writing strategy between AI and us mere mortals, But, I do believe we should be the dominant partner.

What about AI based tools like Grammarly or Reverso used by the most non native English speakers? Will they be detected as AI generated texts? Thanks

Advise, well noted. Thanks a bunch Andy.

What are of them is free?

PLEASE DO A VIDEO ON FULL PROFESSORS WHO TAKE FIRST-AUTHORSHIPS IN PHD STUDENTS' WORK. THIS IS A HUGE SCAM IN ACADEMIA AND RESEARCH WHICH IS TOTALLY HUSHED UP AND UNADDRESSED.

Unfortunately, there is no option available for us students who are studying in Africa. You see, most of African countries don't have access that can allow you pay online anywhere in the world even if you are capable of paying. So is there anyway for us students with a very limited access to bypass ai detection?

@messagedeleted4307

Ай бұрын

Hahaha nobody cares about Africa 😂😂😂

@atogthe1st

Ай бұрын

Do it old school and instead of copy and paste just rewrite the ai sentence with your own words

@atogthe1st

Ай бұрын

Also quillbot is free but ai detection is always updating and adapting to new methods best way is do it yourself with ai for resarch

@johnmactavish4451

Ай бұрын

@@messagedeleted4307 Indeed, they only care about natural resources we have because without it, they know their throat will dry instantaneously!!

@johnmactavish4451

Ай бұрын

@@atogthe1st Since I don't have much time, I guess this is the only option available to me that can get me out this mess right now.

How do you get turn it in access?

I recently sent a manuscript that I fully wrote to a journal owned by Elsevier. Turnitin detected my preprint copy on a preprint server and the managing editor asked if I could take it off the preprint server (Elsevier owns SSRN). I told him no. Turnitin is ridiculous. Be aware: if you have copies on a preprint server, some managing editors are wankers about this.

not sure about undetectable anymore. I had humanised a text and ran it through turnitin and it stated It was made by ai.

Have you written anything that is entirely original and see what the detection is?

is phrasly free or do u have to pay?

If writing using AI tools is considered wrong or taboo then the same logic of thinking should also apply when using AI to detect AI-assisted writing. Based on this, using AI to detect AI is very wrong, in addition to creating many possibilities of wrong accusations and causing anxiety that should not exist.

Your software "humanize" failed with CopyLeaks. I tried 2x to rewrite it with your software and each time it came back 100% AI.

Phrasly is the best. Even thr easy version is able to destroy originality’s Turbo 3

If an average publishing professors' work product were run through credible AI detection, the jig would be up. Makes sense they would pick the worst one for their up and coming students, lol

crazy that you test tools that are long proven to be inaccurate.

Undetectable AI couldn't pass Originality AI Turbo 3.0 :((

Fake. Don't fall for that. Yes, it can give low AI detection but the content you will get will not fit for a purpose. It gives you wrong content.

@sagnikmaity6734

Ай бұрын

Yes sir..

@YunusAli-xs1wk

Ай бұрын

Guys, this guy is a lecturer who works in a university

@danielkrupah

Ай бұрын

@@YunusAli-xs1wk what does it implies? I am not against him but I am saying that those softwares don’t give you a quality content after running your write up

Netus ai bypasses all ai detectors, including turnitin

There's a significant difference between generating content from an AI tool, and testing this; and passing your own human work through an AI tool to be reworded. Detection is more interested in the first usage of AI; and not so much in the second usage, as this is what spell-checkers and Grammarly do anyway.

this test would be complete with your human layer of assessment how rubbish the result was in each case. It's easy to bypass AI if you suddenly make stupid mistakes, for example humanizing often changes narrative to first person which is easy but unacceptable. Detectors simply think it's a daft person and too bad for AI.

Can you do one with Turnitin?

At the risk of sounding old fashioned I feel that one should write in their own words and avoid AI tools to prevent a loss of creative writing skills and avoid becoming a lazy brain in the long run

@carultch

Ай бұрын

Unfortunately, there is no way to prove your innocence. AI detectors fail on content written in the 90's.

these didnt work and i got a bad turnit in score

If Google detects also so bad, then it's irrelevant what we publish 😂

Undetectable is a complete waste of time and money as they reduce the content to a tiny fraction. For 1000s words, you get like 20 or similar ratios.

VIP

It doesn't look legit as you did not show the entire originality AI score, instead you typed a number in excel leading to suspicion. Moreover, you have referral codes below in description. SOMETHING FISHY!!

@alinasar9502

Ай бұрын

yes, I also thought it

You should start an AI channel. That’s pretty much all you talk about these days.

Dont use Phrasely its BS. I couldn't even get a 1900 word to humanise. Its a scam.

Didn't include StealthGPT because you didn't want to show us beating everyone else? :)

alr u def got payed to promote this

Yeah, help people cheat their way through uni. What a world

Your content was originally your own before you asked it to rewrite so originality was overly excited at detecting

Undetectable ai is the worst tool ever. I paid 15$ cause of your video and it didn't even remove 1% ai text. Please do not make such paid videos for personal profits.