UK Bad Drivers & Driving Fails Compilation | UK Car Crashes Dashcam Caught (w/ Commentary) #79
⭐This video featuring driving fails, instant karma, close call, road rage, hit and run, car crashes, good drivers, bad drivers, and many more... This video can be utilized as a learning tool, so the viewers can learn from other mistakes, not their own.
*Driving safely should be your number one concern behind the wheel. Following these defensive driving tips from our videos to improve your own road safety.
⭐Ruby Dashcam Academy provides actual footage of road incidents captured on dash cams. There's a story-line & our own unique contributions (TEXT COMMENTARY & VOICE-OVER) throughout the video. We have also added the special editing effects, trimming, zooming, etc with the footage throughout the compilation. This whole process required our 3-5 days for producing a video.
⭐These videos with own unique contributions can be used as an educational and informative resource for viewers to analyze and evaluate situations, stay alert and get out of a potentially dangerous situation on the road in the future.
⭐Visit our official website for defensive driving tips: rubydashcamacademy.com/
⭐ALL VIDEOS USED WITH LICENSING AGREEMENT FROM COPYRIGHT OWNER!
If we made a mistake or you just want to remove your clip, please let us know here: hannahbruntnell114@gmail.com
⭐Submit your clip for the feature here: rubydashcamacademy.com/submit...
---------
Thank you for watching and stay safe!
#ukdashcam #ukcarcrashes #baddrivers #drivingfails
Пікірлер: 373
The lorry driver picking up the debris after the mobile crane hit the traffic light was, in fact, carrying the ballast for said crane. He's probably dying laughing at his colleague. 5:18
@stephenwalker6823
10 ай бұрын
Many years ago a very large, multi-wheeled trailer (96 wheels IIRC) and pulled by a Scania heavy-haulage tractor visited the factory that I worked at, to move a 140 tonne gas-turbine powered, 24MW generator set. A couple of weeks later it was back to move the second unit, but demolished the traffic lights at the end of the road when turning in - the council, ignoring that we sent out more than 50 oversized loads per year and had 500+ people working there, had re-laid out the junction, making it impossible oversized vehicles to get around without hitting the lights!
Don't know if I'd be driving so closely behind that swaying trailer full of straw bales in that first clip.
@ArminGrewe
11 ай бұрын
I know I wouldn't.
@Rockhopper1
11 ай бұрын
i would have baled out
@russcattell955i
11 ай бұрын
Yes, the trailer was clearly overloaded, I thought we were in India for a mo !
judge was an audi driver
@machendave
11 ай бұрын
Are the TT really Audi or just a VW Golf with a body mod? Either way a hairdressers car
@johnt.848
11 ай бұрын
Another incorrect commenter that believes the lies the cammer wrote. Don't change lanes in a roundabout, simple really, like those that believe him.
@pussinboots1145
10 ай бұрын
@@johnt.848 The cammer didn't change lanes.The Audi did.
@machendave
9 ай бұрын
@@justjay3890 Audi driver are we?
No 14: The judge was clearly part of the Audi Drivers' Alliance. If NOT being clairvoyant makes you 75% to blame, there's no hope for any of us...
@insoft_uk
11 ай бұрын
Yep, Red Audi driver clearly at fault, as a cyclist that driver should be holding back as an HGV is allowed to cross lanes on roundabouts due to their size when turning also being too close will mean you be in the driver blind spot not smart
@juncusbufonius
11 ай бұрын
Clearly the judge is either an Audi driver or has never seen the stupidity of Audi drivers. So all vehicles with limited visibility should take responsibility for the actions of vehicles with superior visibility that can easily spot something ten times bigger than their puny dick of a car.
@Ian-ww6mf
11 ай бұрын
@@insoft_uk I thought it was the Audi's fault at first, (it usually is) but I watched it a few times. I could be wrong but it looks to me like the lorry is waiting at the roundabout in the right hand lane, the Audi is in the middle lane. They enter the roundabout and the lorry moves left in to the middle lane onto the Audi, making it the lorry's fault. Whenever I've driven lorries I've spent more time looking in the mirrors than looking straight ahead, this driver doesn't seem to check them much. If I was in the Audi though I would have stuck my foot down and got away from the lorry as soon as the lights went green.
@sw8296
11 ай бұрын
@@Ian-ww6mf No... the lorry driver is absolutely obeying the signs and road markings correctly. The left lane at the lights takes the A34 exit. The middle lane at the lights, after the A34 exit, becomes the left lane, which is for M3 North. This is the lane the Audi was in. The right lane at the lights then becomes the middle lane (or right lane) for M3 South.
@Ian-ww6mf
11 ай бұрын
@@sw8296 You are correct, the lorry was in the right hand lane, the Audi was in the middle lane. The lorry then moved in to the middle lane that the Audi was in. By any definition that is not "obeying the signs and road markings correctly". If the lorry hadn't moved over in to the lane the Audi was occupying they would never have come together. Of course we change lanes all the time but it has to be done safely, which the lorry driver failed to do. I'm not talking totally out of my backside, I used to be an HGV instructor.
#JusticeForDaryll That Audi was clearly in the wrong and so was that judge.
#15 - you have to feel for the lorry driver - the Audi effectively drove into him, it is not as if the lorry is small.
@gdwnet
11 ай бұрын
totally. the court basically said he should have anticipated the audi driver would be a typical audi driver which gives them an excuse to keep being fucking awful.
@thunderbug8640
11 ай бұрын
@@gdwnet Yeah, it makes no sense. You did everything correctly but didn’t anticipate someone else being a moron and you’re to blame? Seems crooked if ever i heard crooked, id defiantly appeal in that case. No way it would hold up, judge was clearly very biased here for some reason.
@steveblick168
11 ай бұрын
As a lorry driver myself, these types of accidents are inevitable in these sort of situations and are massively frustrating when people can't work out which lanes to use. However, i'm afraid the lorry driver did himself no favours, as he never bothered to check his mirrors - before starting off or whilst on the move, possibly why the courts went in favour of the car driver.
@eddherring4972
11 ай бұрын
I assume you mean clip 14. The thing is that the cammer moves into the lane with the Audi in it so that’s why it’s the LGV driver’s fault regardless of who’s in the right lane. I am a class 2 driver and I certainly would be expecting faster traffic coming from my left if I was in the right (hand) lane. I’d also be checking my left mirrors to get myself over to the left side as soon as possible that would include the kerb view mirror. I don’t know why the cammer is in the right lane going into the right side of a three lane roundabout before cutting back into the middle lane but that’s just me and I honestly and obviously don’t know the circumstances or the area it happened. The best thing my LGV instructor told me was to be assertive but generally to let all the other traffic do what it’s doing when possible. The right lane is the last place I’d want to be and that seems the same for this driver, unfortunately he needs to check all the mirrors I’d be 50/50 mirrors and looking ahead. Shame this incident has shaken that driver so much as to quit the industry.
@_synt3rax_437
11 ай бұрын
@@steveblick168You dont see his Head when the Video start so thats Speculating, also he did look in the Mirrlr at 7:23
#14 I'm not a big vehicle driver but, that seems insane to me that it was his fault?? Is this the norm when it comes down to accidents that involves large vehicles? They're blamed because they didn't anticipate someone not driving properly ?
@j.blogsblues
11 ай бұрын
I have known similar situations, the lorry driver probably wasn't held at fault more that he wasn't able to claim from the other driver. One guy in a truck who was hit at a roundabout by a red light runner was asked 'have you ever seen anyone else run that light?' when he said 'yes, a few times' then the judge decided his lack of anticipation contributed to the accident and was therefore not able to claim off the other driver. It's madness, really, but in the same situation be very careful how you answer questions.
@hellsblazes2707
11 ай бұрын
Should get lawyer and an expert witness (to confirm you can’t see them) and take it to the court of appeals.
@j.blogsblues
11 ай бұрын
Actually watching it again, the red Audi is alongside the lorry at the lights (you can see it in the lorry's wing mirror) and it was the lorry driver who moved from the right hand lane to the middle lane where the Audi was. Car drivers should learn never to sit alongside large vehicles as they do not have great rearward visibility. In this case the red Audi should've accelerated in front of the lorry to get out of it's way.
@shaunmaloney9646
11 ай бұрын
Yeah the lorry looked to be in the far right lane at the lights on a 3 lane junction. Then decided to move over to the middle lane and cut off the audi. So clearly the lorry driver fault this one.
@thefirstchoice5493
11 ай бұрын
@@shaunmaloney9646 The left lane of the 3 was left turn only, as the recap video at the end of their clip shows. The middle lane became the left hand lane on the roundabout after that turn off, and the right lane became the middle lane. The lorry didn't "decide to move over" they followed the lane for their route correctly. If we all go to court and get asked "have you ever seen an Audi driver doing something stupid before?" and then get penalised for not anticipating that they are likely to do something stupid then they really will own the road like a large number of them already think they do!
Didn't anticipate the Audi driver? No one can anticipate anything an Audi driver does. They have their own rules after all 😂
#11 the lorry driver who picked the debris up was travelling with the crane. He had the rigger mats and ballast on the trailer
#11's thoughtful HGV driver was carrying the weight blocks for the crane, least he could do to be honest
@ukaszjurys2475
11 ай бұрын
Driver of a crane would not even see that he damaged anything while making turn.
@MiguelSantini19-57
11 ай бұрын
@ukaszjurys2475 That crane truck is left-hand drive, so the driver would have a good view of it in his wing mirror.
@ukaszjurys2475
11 ай бұрын
@@MiguelSantini19-57 He was not even watching his side.Mirror probably too small to see top of the rear end.Though driver from second truck would have tell him and they would both go without informing the police about situation
@MiguelSantini19-57
11 ай бұрын
@ukaszjurys2475 How do you know the driver didn't check his wing mirror, and how do you know the other driver spoke to the crane driver, and they both decided not to inform the police?
#6 Camera truck is completely in the wrong. There's even a massive arrow on the road showing the red car took the correct path.
@STANDUP47
11 ай бұрын
My thought exactly
@wellingboroughnorthants2228
11 ай бұрын
Yes 100% correct. I go past here every day and at times both lanes are full coming off the A45 here. Where the car came off the lane changes on the A45 to give you the option to exit the A45 here. At no point is there anything to say the the left exit lane splits off into 2 lanes. If a driver switches lane here from the left it is clearly a case of checking nobody is exiting the A45 in that lane. Every day i see drivers just drift from the left into the other lane thinking the left lane turns into a second lane.
@TinkyWinkyWindy
11 ай бұрын
It's really poor lane marking... Going up to the junction only the left lane is leaving according to road signs. At the junction, there is an exit arrow suggesting it's ok to leave from lane two, despite previous markings. Seems to be a Northampton thing, as same as it is the same as A428 exit as well... Bottom line is both drivers are changing lanes, and both could be equally at fault given the markings...
@pcr8918
11 ай бұрын
Abysmal markings. IMPO red car should give way as crossing markings whilst the cammer isn’t.
@fuzzluvver69
11 ай бұрын
@@pcr8918As much as I hate to say it, you're wrong. That lane is solely for traffic leaving the motorway, and the cam truck is changing lanes. I have seen other identical setups elsewhere too. It's a poor layout, but the truck with the camera is definitely in the wrong.
clip #14 is at Winnall in Winchester M3/A34 junction 9 for those that don't know it. I used to use that route every working day and that happens all the time. The countless times it happened to me, I became wise to it. It's a very poor road layout anyway. Having to get from lane 3 to lane 2 on a roundabout in about 30 yards is ridiculous. They should change it so that lanes 2 and 3 entering the roundabout stay as lanes 2 and 3 at the next set of lights for the M3 south, but these road planners think they know best
@LGTGHOSTHUNTING
11 ай бұрын
Yep im down there all the time in the truck, never used the right lane though as its clear that you can use the middle lane and avoid this drama alltogether.
@philmcmillan72
11 ай бұрын
The signage is terrible there. The Lorry and Audi joined from Easton lane where a sign states M3S is right hand lane only, middle lane is M3N. Once on the roundabout, it changes to left lane is M3N and middle and right lanes are M3S. Lorry drivers heading to the M3S should be then in the middle lane to allow faster moving vehicles to be in the right lane. If only the person who designed this mad layout actually drove vehicles, many accidents could be prevented.
#8, if only there was someone there to arrest the driver for dangerous driving, firstly turning left and cutting in front of a car from the middle of the road, and secondly crashing into the barrier after the turn
@ianemery2925
11 ай бұрын
I think he may have hit the car waiting at the junction to pull out as well.
@andrewgarner2224
11 ай бұрын
And no blues until after the turn.
@georgebarnes8163
11 ай бұрын
the driver who was a drunk teenager was arrested at the scene
@Whydidmyhandlechange414
10 ай бұрын
@@georgebarnes8163oh, it wasn’t an officer?
@georgebarnes8163
10 ай бұрын
No, the cop car was stolen.@@Whydidmyhandlechange414
#14 Makes me scratch my head. I can only assume the judge is an Audi driver, or his wife ran off with an HGV driver?
#3 a muted video pointing out 2 drivers were shouting at each other, they walk amongst us 😂
#8 Impeccable driving from a “professional” driver, performing a safe overtake in wet conditions and then full stop having encountered an obstruction. All jokes aside the driver should be reported for driving without due care and attention (due to the lack of care for other road users) and dangerous driving. At least they can’t be charged with failing to stop hahaha
@leeowen4989
11 ай бұрын
Police officers are not professional drivers, a professional driver is someone who gets paid to drive. There are even distinctions in regards to insurance as to what constitutes professional driving and driving as part of your job.
@georgebarnes8163
11 ай бұрын
The cop car was stolen driven by a drunk teenager not a professional driver
@jeremypnet
11 ай бұрын
I think he had some explaining to do back at the station.
@hausmaster9801
11 ай бұрын
My biggest question is why hasn’t the cammer stopped? They should have stopped and held position before the junction when seeing and hearing the police vehicle to give it options. The cammer moving is one of the many causes of the incident.
@maquettemusic1623
10 ай бұрын
blues are on and all, could easily have been trying to respond to a stabbing, or someone literally dying. Did he fuck up? yeah sure, but saying "should be reported for driving without due care and attention" is so fucking reductive it's unreal. People get pissed when the police do their job and pissed when they don't, it's a lose lose for the average bloke on the beat.
3:00 Lukasz is a flipping liability! Didn't he cause a couple of crashes in the last video? It's perfectly fine for the red Qashqai to exit in to that lane, it's literally signed on the road! What on earth was Lukasz thinking?!
@ArminGrewe
11 ай бұрын
I'd argue that's debatable. Lukasz was in the correct lane and his lane was splitting into two lanes, where he continued in the right hand lane. While there was an arrow for the red car that also meant they had to change lane, as their lane went straight on. I'd say that's at least a 50:50, as the car changing lane has to make sure the lane is clear before moving.
@shm5547
11 ай бұрын
@@ArminGrewe This junction is near me and I know it very well, the red QQ driver did nothing wrong. Lukasz's lane did not split, it's clearly marked that it's for traffic in lane 2 as the dashed lines go right back to the junction and there's a massive left arrow! Every time I use this junction, vehicles are doing exactly what the red QQ did.
@andrzejrubacha9521
11 ай бұрын
@@shm5547 i would say you have no brain, my brain is very close to me. Red car change lane or you are blind?
@spiderbootsy
11 ай бұрын
@@ArminGrewe the lorry was the one that should be looking to see if the lane is clear. the red car didnt come out of nowhere. it was always on the lorrys offside and was indicating to exit the motorway. Lukasz would have seen this if they had bothered to check their mirrors before moving.
@ImprezzionOfficial
11 ай бұрын
I know what he was thinking. Pierdole. Basically.
3:05 totally the lorry drivers fault. Guess the massive white arrow on the road was in his blind spot when he decided to cut into the other lane
3:32, it's because he's a taxi driver and believes he isn't subject to the same rules. That's one that needs sending to his Licensing Authority; conclusive proof of wrongdoing isn't necessary to them - but a welcome bonus when it's there!
That jag at the end is a legendary clip 😂
4:40 #9. When you realized what was happening, slowing right down to let them in would have avoided any problems.
3:06 the guy on the red car is in no transgression. arrows in the pavement say that lane can go front or left
@ditch3827
11 ай бұрын
Just because there is an arrow saying you can change lanes doesn't mean you can if that lane is already occupied.
@BrunoLopes-lc9kw
11 ай бұрын
The lane didn’t even exist before they met
@ArminGrewe
11 ай бұрын
@@BrunoLopes-lc9kw the red car is changing lanes without checking if the lane is free. The cammer is continuing on a lane that's splitting into two. Bad driving by both, but most of the fault I'd say on the red car for an unsafe lane change
@ditch3827
11 ай бұрын
@@BrunoLopes-lc9kw Indeed hence they both should have made sure it was empty before going into it, arrow or no arrow
@spiderbootsy
11 ай бұрын
@@ditch3827 Yes, defensive driving is good, but the cammer is still at fault. if you are changing lanes on a sliproad, especially as early as the cammer did, then you should check for traffic that is also exiting. He didnt look. Thats inexcusable, especially driving a vehicle that large.
The type of person who goes home at the end of every day to extract every little piece of imperfect driving captured in their dashcam to upload to KZread is a very sad person. To post every little "he got too close", "she didn't indicate" and "he's speeding" clip online is just ridiculous. Welcome to driving in the real world!
Amazes me some people that want to brake check an HGV.
#1 Personally I'd have dropped back a bit. Those hay bales might look soft and fluffy but they weigh close to a ton and will, at best, write your vehicle off if it hits you and at worst crumple your roof like a tin can. I saw one roll off the top stack of a trailer and onto a (thankfully empty) defender once and it crushed the entire cabin down to the seats, if you didn't die instantly I don't reckon you'd have long left by the time the fire brigade had cut you out.
@leathleyg5995
11 ай бұрын
Maybe the drivers kid has a rabbit.....
7.03 Something very similar to this happened to my missus. She was going straight on at a four lane round about, when a woman next to her (one her left) decided she wanted to take the third exit (a right turn). The wife's insurance said that it was "pressing for a cases of both at fault 50/50, as my missus should have 'anticipated the woman on her left would turn right".
As a truck driver the first one gives me so much anxiety!
3:41 When you know the laws of the land, but not the laws of physics
#14 As a truck driver of 36 years no way would I be accepting any blame for that bullshit.
At 5:28 is the result of road design experts still using the Morris Minor as the standard for lane width. They also did the same near my home such that the buses demolished the bollards. The lanes were then widened.
Shouldn't the judge of atleast taken in to consideration that the hgv driver actually pulled in after the audi went off down the slip road(from the lane the audi should of remained in) It is plainly obvious this is a warped verdict. How many drivers would of just cleared off and called it 'knock for knock'?
#9, an alternative reading is you made it difficult for him to merge back in as you didn’t like being overtaken, then he had to brake as you left him no room to the car in front so he had to make reasonable room or he’d be in the back of them.
@britishcadet
11 ай бұрын
#9, initially it's a solid double white line, not to be crossed. You'd anticipate those attempting to merge in front would judge accordingly, if it's not possible to drop back, not continue over solid double whites. The expectation with an overtake is for a safe place to re-enter the lane, not bully your way in. It can be argued the ford made a massive mistake but you'd typically see some degree of confidence in re-entering the lane assuming the individual can drive, additionally, you'd anticipate some gentleness to the braking, to gradually increase distance rather than getting a bit sharp causing alarm and inconvenience to the one immediately behind and those further behind. To sum it up, the ford's a massive cock, the dashcammer could've done with a touch more understanding and increasing his following distance due to the fords inability to predict and drive.
@jonboulton6701
11 ай бұрын
@@britishcadet the Ford does start the overtake too early, which is a mistake, but the “lack of confidence” and “sharp braking ar E because the cammer doesn’t give them a big enough gap. Of course they “lack confidence” coming back in as the cammer is right on the back corner of their car, probably in their blind spot. The cammer isn’t giving them sufficient room to come back in (which is against the Highway Code) and the Ford has no option but to break more sharply. The Fords manoeuvre isnt good, they should have been more patient, but the cammer is also at fault here.
First clip is absolutely fine. There farmers. Can do whatever they want.😳
3:42 golden 😂😂😂
#8 - cakes offence for sure!! #1 - I nearly had my trailer full of bales turn over on me. Fortunately it was a private farm track and the horses knew to stop. I was 8…
Awful maneuver from the police car at 3:40, should have held off a little…but could the cammer be guilty of not being aware of the blue lights there too? Continuing at the same pace until turning left instead of slowing down and allowing the police to get past safely?
@markgambrill
11 ай бұрын
I looks like they did slow a bit. Maybe for the turn but it's hard to tell. It's also hard to spot which way a police car with all the flashies in is indicating. Little orange light gets lots in the christmas tree. Made worse by the conditions. Last point, I believe that emergency services are under obligation to drive safely before all other actions, and should have received additional training on the subject.
@smgdfcmfah
11 ай бұрын
He should have pulled over and then maybe the police wouldn't have felt the need to race around him and beat him to the corner in the rain. Poor driving by cop, clueless driving by cammer.
@bestintheworld568
11 ай бұрын
@@markgambrill you're spot on with what you're saying, couldn't agree more. I don't think the cammer was aware of the police car until it was in front of them though, which made the corner a lot tighter for the police than it could have been. But yes, very poor maneuver from someone who should be a highly trained driver.
@georgebarnes8163
11 ай бұрын
@@bestintheworld568 the driver was a drunk teenager who had stolen the car, he was arrested at the scene
@bestintheworld568
11 ай бұрын
@@georgebarnes8163really? If that’s the case then maybe the channel should do a bit more research on the clip and explain that.
#6 is a case of confusing road markings if ever I saw them. The initial road markings show the left lane going left, but at the junction there is another arrow showing you can slip off to the slip road too. So the red car was following one set of markings. Also the slip road lane markings are very faded.
@spiderbootsy
11 ай бұрын
The markings arent that confusing. The red car did nothing wrong. the cammer should check for overtaking traffic before changing lanes unnecessarily. It helps if you pay attention.
@ditch3827
11 ай бұрын
@@spiderbootsy But equally the red car should check that the lane is clear before changing lanes and it would have helped if the driver of the red car paid attention too. The fact is that both vehicles tried to enter the new lane at the same time and neither yielded to the other.
@ArminGrewe
11 ай бұрын
@@spiderbootsy the cammer wasn't changing lanes, the lane split for the cammer and they continued on the right hand one. The one changing lane was the red car, as their lane went straight on following the main road.
@stolentardis2111
11 ай бұрын
@@ArminGrewethe lane didn’t spilt, a new lane was created for vehicles exiting at that point. As indicated by the massive white arrow on the road. The lorry changed lanes the marking for the new lane go right back to the junction.
@MegaPaggo
11 ай бұрын
There are two junctions like this near us, road signs and road markings say one thing ahead of the junction and the road markings at the junction show something completely different actually at the junction. Whoever thought that was a good idea needs to have rethink
Love that emergency stopping action by the police car - I believe it was a "pole stop".... P.S. Does that judge own an Audi.
Very true. People are self centred and only think about themselves and think they are the most important person on the planet. Having a licence to drive is a privilege not a right
5:31 I’m sure I’ve seen other incidents captured on this same camera before!
The cowards in that Civic after the crash. Does my head in.
7:39 - Clearly the judge is an Audi driver who subscribes to the rule that Audi drivers can do what they want on the roads & the rest of us have to drive around them. Surely the Audi driver should have anticipated that the lorry was moving in that lane and probably couldn't have seen the Audi so should have shown the same level of awareness that the judge expected of the lorry driver. At least the banana appeared untraumatised.
number 11 , that HGV driver is carrying the ballast for the crane , so likely works for the same company
No 1. Many many years ago I followed a tractor towing a very overloaded trailer carrying hay bales. It went under some power lines. 6 bales got wiped off the top. The power lines survived. My sister got 6 free bales of hay, for her horse. I stopped. I Loaded them up. Thanks for the free horse food.
I think that if you have gone through a set of traffic lights and get stuck, you are ( lawfully) allowed to carry on. 🤷♂️
For #14 & every other driver out there, red & amber means stop, not go.
To be fair, the crane probably didn't realise he has clipped the traffic lights. I doubt that the contact was even felt by him.
the silence spoils the footage , as real life doesn't get muted.....................
I’d be making a complaint against the judge/magistrate in that last case. stab victims with get jail time. Because they should have anticipated the stabbing.
No 1. Sorry mate, I would have been following that haybale from a mile further back! No. 13 I had to chuckle 2 idiots causing their own mayhem, the car signalling and turning right obviously didn’t check the offside mirror and the twerp overtaking a line of traffic, well!
10 instant karma unfortunately there are more and more people these days prepared to ignore a red light and not enough Police to get them
number 12 at last someone that obeys the rules of a box junction, well done young man/woman/thing/ it/ them
#14 truck driver went from the outside to middle and cut him up in the red car. Sorry,I normally back the hgv drivers but you definitely messed up!
That judge needs to loose his license to practice law
I assume at 3:07 the dash cam owner thought it was the red cars fault...clearly not!
I would appeal against that verdict. That's an absurdity. He wasn't in front of you so had no right to overtake. F1 rules should apply
@MeTube3
10 ай бұрын
You don’t get the choice to appeal as the case is between insurers and they clearly didn’t think it worth it.
Where I live, brake checking is a criminal offence. And you can lose your license for 5 years, and have to retake your driving test.
Not so sympathetic with #9 - Yes, an idiot in the Ford, but the cammer looks like they were deliberately speeding up to make that (stupid) maneuver even more difficult/dangerous. Yes, gearing any large vehicle can be a pain, but all they had to do was let off the gas for 2-3 seconds.
@spiderbootsy
11 ай бұрын
he clearly put his foot down.
It always amazes me how people say "man it's just a straw bale..." bales are very heavy... If one was to fly off, there's a reason traffic cops will stop a vehicle with an unsecured load of bales. And Daryll wins this video purely because of his little Boba Fett standing guard over his carbonite frozen banana.
You will never win in a court of law if you drive an HGV and you are hit by a car.
#15 Worst donuts I've ever seen
I would've appealed the judges verdict. It's an impossibility to anticipate what someone else is going to do 😡
NO. 15, a very slow doughnut by the jag’
Boba Fett is getting his 5 a day
there are two types of observers and one is genuine the other has a bias and is not realy unattached to the drama
Yeah 14 is why I stopped driving large vehicles.
I was taught to drive by an ex Flying Squad policeman, those were the days. Yesterday I saw a police car parked just beyond a pedestrian crossing on the zigzags with the two police officers inside just chatting.
@ditch3827
11 ай бұрын
Police cars are allowed to park on zigzags; see Section 14 of The Traffic Signs Regulations and General Directions 2016
@spiderbootsy
11 ай бұрын
@@ditch3827 Where does it say that they are allowed to? police cars when not on emergency calls are no different to any other vehicles and are subject to all traffic laws
@rafthejaf8789
11 ай бұрын
@@ditch3827 I'll take your word for it but they didn't seem to be on an emergency call, they were just chatting. If it's wrong for us.....
@ditch3827
11 ай бұрын
@@spiderbootsy Section 14 (3)(c)(viii) of The Traffic Signs Regulations and General Directions 2016
@ditch3827
11 ай бұрын
@@rafthejaf8789 They don't have to be on an emergency call to be exempt, just be a car used by the police.
#6 you’re in the wrong and the amount of people who think they can do what you did is amazing. The road signs before that junction make it pretty clear what lane you’re supposed to be in. You just cut the car up.
@ianwalshaw1274
11 ай бұрын
Yes he did, there was no need to change lanes.
#14: Maybe I just don't understand British roundabouts. How is the HGV not at fault? He's coming from a 3-lane road. Should he not be in the right lane on the roundabout? Switched to the middle lane with no indicator, while never checking his mirror for traffic that may be in that lane. I don't see any lane markings indicating that the right lane becomes the middle lane. The board shows right lane is A272. The roundabout shows A272 being the middle lane. So to me, HGV didn't indicate a lane change and merged on top of another vehicle.
7:50 why would something so minor end up in court? Is this common for HGV drivers to end up in court over a minor scrape?
@hoagy_ytfc
11 ай бұрын
It would have been a civil dispute about fault and who pays for repairs, no more than that. I’ve been to court over a similar thing because other driver denied fault. My legal protection took it to court. I won easily, thankfully.
1:20 What is that advertising on the side of the building?
I don't understand how these Judges come up with these verdicts makes absolutely no sense. For accidents like this they should have a judge who has actually driven HGV, would make our life a lot easier.
@jablot5054
9 ай бұрын
It's called back handers
#14 needs a new solicitor.
#13 - always advisable to overtake two cars with a junction/opening either side. Just unlucky on this occasion
@petecoventry6858
11 ай бұрын
Loving the sarcasm here today :) i guess it's also unlucky as it was stolen
5 minutes 12 seconds 😂
That police officer needs to drive slowly
@georgebarnes8163
11 ай бұрын
it was a drunk teenager in a stolen cop car
3:40 And it's a crash, crash, crash...
6:02 I still cannot decide whether people are just so selfish or just thick as shit.
Oh, I *_do_* hope that the dash cam footage of the police car at 3:37 was given _to_ the police. If so that's going to feature in all future local police driving classes as a "This gentlemen, is how *not* to do it.". The driver's canteen nickname is now probably "Yolkie" because of all the egg that he's got on his face.
Too many idiots on the roads these days they just don’t care
The judge dealing with the case at 8:00 minutes clearly is not fit for purpose and needs replacing.
#8 why isnt the driver pulled over to allow the police car to pass?
@peter7582
11 ай бұрын
Looks to me the police car didn't have their emergency lights on until just after they passed the cam car. Should have had them on well in advance before doing a manoeuvre like that.
@CycolacFan
10 ай бұрын
@@peter7582I wonder if him reaching to switch them on contributed to the crash?
Bro you gotta put some kinda music in the clips that have no audio, basically 80% of the video..
How the fuck was the lorry driver penalised for what a stereotypical Audi driver did? The judge even accepted that the Audi driver was in the wrong lane, and was hiding in the lorry driver's blind spot while making an unsafe and illegal lane change. But it's still mostly the lorry driver's fault? How is that right or fair? If it were me I'd be locked up for contempt of court.
@Richard-Bullock
11 ай бұрын
@@zbf5h89ftb I'm not saying it should be trial by stereotype. I am just saying that the Audi driver IS a stereotype. He fucked up, and could not or would not accept that absolute fact. And the poor lorry driver somehow got right properly fucked over!
@Richard-Bullock
11 ай бұрын
@@zbf5h89ftb But he did NOT change lane. The dumbarse Audi driver did|!
Judge would be a noob i suppose as my question is how a hgv driver would see a car in a kerb mirror (side mirror would not show that car being underneath) while being focused on driving forward and changing gears and getting into proper lane...and watching other drivers and getting into next set of traffic lights.Its not that easy to anticipate that some car might be hidden down there or perhaps it is not ? You getting into lane because you see its clear and then car driver decide to undertake your 44 t truck wihtout having the smallest idea that ghv driver have limited visibility. Thats just a thought as class 2 driver myself.
@dennisphoenix1
11 ай бұрын
That clip it's a class 2 wagon , these must be really old clips anyway .
#15 This is normal for St-Helens.
7:15 - In what world was that the lorry drivers fault? His positioning was perfect all the way through. The Audi driver tried to enter his lane and took no action when they saw a HGV getting closer to his face. The driver is so stupid they even decided to pull off on a sliproad entrance to a motorway. Apparently this sort of thing is a big issue and something that causes a lot of lorry drivers to leave. Apparently there's always somebody penalising them for random crap.
@BigDavie2000
11 ай бұрын
Hierarchy of Road Users. Highway Code Rule H1 "Everyone suffers when road collisions occur, whether they are physically injured or not. But those in charge of vehicles that can cause the greatest harm in the event of a collision bear the greatest responsibility to take care and reduce the danger they pose to others". Basically you are fucked if you are a HGV driver and could anticipate there may be a collision.
@khalidacosta7133
11 ай бұрын
@@BigDavie2000 That's all good and well but the Audi drove into the HGV... that's what I don't get. Yet, as a cyclist, when drivers from a side road, pulled out infront of me, when I have priority (and already going 30+mph), police are just "sorry, no action taken"
4:45 Driver went on red/amber, didn't wait for green. Red means stop. Red always means stop.
@v52gc
10 ай бұрын
Can see the stop line in the video, doesn’t matter when you start to move, it’s when you cross the stop line.
@BongoBaggins
10 ай бұрын
@@v52gc We both know that drivers do it 50% of the time. Drivers are thick and drivers go on red.
Always bad weather....
Shame that lorry didnt write off that red audi, what a poor piece of driving on the part of the audi, he/she deserved to be more inconvenienced than a scratched door.
#4 needs their licence taking off them. 🤷♂️
@Snoozzzzzze
10 ай бұрын
Completely legal and safe overtake, you can drive over hatchings bordered by a broken line if you deem it safe to do so. The lorry driver objected to being overtaken and his aggression exacerbated the stimulation. We also don’t know how long the car was held up behind to lorry and what his driving was like. The camera cars rarely show their sh1t driving.
10 videos in, not a single crash yet.....
3:40 the cammer should have been much slower there to give the police driver options
Some drivers need a re test or banning !
You gotta love the Brits....dimmer than a 25 watt light bulb.
@MeTube3
10 ай бұрын
Got to love when people expose their own scumbag nature with these kind if comments. Dimmer than the inside of a dogs colon.
#9 driver sped up to prevent the guy from being able to overtake and filter back in - that's why you got brakechecked. Both drivers in the wrong.
@jeremypnet
11 ай бұрын
He lied when he said he left space. Also, the first sentence “he wouldn’t give up overtaking” tells us there was probably a bit of speeding up to discourage overtaking before the clip began.
@JB_inks
11 ай бұрын
@@jeremypnet definitely
@Saeglopur2
11 ай бұрын
The driver already let a van and a car merge in, they are under no obligation to let a third car do the same especially when the merge lane is ending. The overtaking car should have held back and gone in behind.
@JB_inks
11 ай бұрын
@@Saeglopur2 he should let the vehicle in if he wants to help prevent a head on smash. Attitudes like yours contribute to many deaths every year.
@Saeglopur2
11 ай бұрын
@joyork Yeah sure, lay the blame at those who drive correctly but not the dangerous drivers who take stupid risks and put everyone else in danger. Pushover/victim blaming attitudes like yours are why the UK is in the mess it's in right now.
3:44 camera driver was a little to blame, car coming the opposite direction and despite the flashing lights continuing to drive forward forcing the police driver to speed up to turn left into the junction, tho if police car just slowed down at the junction the car coming the opposite way would of probably seen the police flashing lights in front and stopped unless there on there phone
3:22, perhaps she was a pretty girl
Clip 4, can idiots like the VW drive not receive points at least for that sort of driving?
No. 7 is perfectly all right because it is a taxi, enough said.