Almost every American military industrial complex organizations describes themselves as non-profit organization

@tophatv2902

2 жыл бұрын

no lol

@victorli7737

2 жыл бұрын

@@tophatv2902 Yes, these "experts" receives fundings from DoD. Nice of them to throw that info in there tho

@dtango8345

2 жыл бұрын

Their just layer of protection for Cia to network a web for adjectives

@CHL41993

2 жыл бұрын

when a company just pay its CEO billions each year and leave nothing on the book, that company is non-profit. just like some mega churches.

@godzillamothra5983

2 жыл бұрын

American think thanks will also do the thinking for you so that you don't have to think anymore, convenient huh? The beauty of it, is that you don't even have to pay the think thank, the American military industrial complex and corporations take care of the bills for you, lovely huh

I love how the media is trying the best to drum up the Chinese “threat” while the experts are trying their best to downplay Chinese technology advancement.

@tankart3645

2 жыл бұрын

(You mean copy off stuff, that actully work worse.) By rallying up threat, the Military Industrial Complex can get more money, by getting more money for the Military itself.

@dddddh1

2 жыл бұрын

kzread.info/dash/bejne/f2GBl62qiabFj84.html You seem wide awake.

@iamsorryforbeingrudebefore1626

2 жыл бұрын

@@tankart3645 congrats, you are now a certified MSM graduate.

@tankart3645

2 жыл бұрын

@@iamsorryforbeingrudebefore1626 MSM?, which MSM, you know how little that narrows the thing down?

@zenastronomy

2 жыл бұрын

doublethink. 1984 Orwellian tactic

0:54 oh yes the best stealth drone, the B-2

@hwg5039

2 жыл бұрын

WSJ just wants to imply that the Chinese drone copied the American design. However, the only similar thing between a reconnaissance drone and a long-range bomber is the flying wing configuration.

@oakoakoak2219

2 жыл бұрын

@@hwg5039 The comparison fail there. To say any aircraft with a flying wing configuration is a copy of US bomber is extremely narcissistic.

@elvita13282

2 жыл бұрын

It reminds me the Serb's air-defence IYWM🤡🇲🇾

@moutainchad2360

2 жыл бұрын

Yo so what do u expect the design to of a drone designed with the exact objective and capacities to appear like aesthetically, a bus with wings?

@Dwg256

2 жыл бұрын

646

If a country's military equipment and technology are not used in combat, it is not a drag, it's a compliment.

@wanglaugh9932

2 жыл бұрын

You found the real information conveyed by this video.

@gallaxian

2 жыл бұрын

The report says that China is gathering data about 200 drones it has sold to 16 countries. I’m sure China has also employed them in its border skirmishes with India.

@yungunit8299

2 жыл бұрын

@@gallaxian "Report says" if its written in English, Cannot be trusted. 99% chance its fake news.

@hotchi1566

2 жыл бұрын

For a good country, military equipment is used to avoid war. For a bad country, military equipment is used to make war.

@spaceisalie5451

2 жыл бұрын

Your right. No country should have ever stepped up and fought the nazis.

China doesn’t need to fly to Hawai’i, only to defend China sovereignty.

To know how great they are, there is a good example. DJI .

@defencebangladesh4068

2 жыл бұрын

yes

There are only a handful of people in the comment area who have been to China, but they seem to know China very well😄

@Minchya

2 жыл бұрын

Do you need to take heroin to know that it is bad ???

@user-wg9zq1ee8f

2 жыл бұрын

I'm Chinese, and China's weapons are toys and plagiarism, and there is no deterrent.

@Minchya

2 жыл бұрын

@@user-wg9zq1ee8f Interesting, do you have personal knowledge ? I watched a program recently that was about poor Chinese weapons sales, it seems that even though the price is good not many buyers are interested.

@ericwong4213

Жыл бұрын

@@Minchya which program? the one from CNN? The program that has access to top of the top Chinese secret in weapon sales? Everyone can make news out of fart. Just for your update, as per today's news, The Australian Strategic Policy Institute found China leading and dominate 37/44 critical future technology, majority in military tech, quantum tech, robotic, AI, while the other 7 is quickly catching up with US. The Hypersonic missile launched by China circled the World, shocking US with Pentagon scientists claimed Chinese nuclear capable missile defies physics. Back in Korea war, due to huge gap of military technology dominance on US side, Chinese casualty was 50 to 1 against US. Now with tech far dominance by China, the casualty will be 20:1 against US. Not to mention Chinese military personels 2x compared to US and all US allies combined (incl EU, Japan, S Korea). Pentagon from time to time warned the coming decade, the Chinese military simply unchallengable.

@Minchya

Жыл бұрын

@@ericwong4213 You display the biggest weakness that all modern Chinese seem to suffer from , HUBRIS

Just look at how were reaching the military tech level of Black Ops 2 :D

@sumitkumarroy8645

2 жыл бұрын

2025 is closing in.

@spaceisalie5451

2 жыл бұрын

:D

Chinese drones had been used in real combat in Libya. China sold their drones to UAE who send them to Libya fighting the opposite forces which deployed Turkey's Bayraktar TB2 drones.

@hisongling3940

Жыл бұрын

结果是被敌对势力痛扁吗？

@shuipingmo5114

Жыл бұрын

@@hisongling3940 断脊之犬别无脑bb，哈士奇的无人机被机场端窝了，土耳其气不过直接派有人战斗机找场子了

@ksc7957

Жыл бұрын

@@hisongling3940 不，BBC的報導是中國無人機及土耳其無人機直接交戰， 土耳其無人機戰敗後 土耳其出動戰艦發射導彈擊落中國無人機

@turishoferi1473

Жыл бұрын

​@@ksc7957 😂😂😂where did you read them at chinese state television? Turkish drone technology is far superior than chinese. Today there are 3 countries with the highest drone technology. Usa turkey and israel

@user-fd1ix3mv4x

Жыл бұрын

@@turishoferi1473 你疯了 中国无人机敢说第二 没有任何国家敢说第一 你去问你的美国爸爸吧！看他承不承认

A malfunctioned fully automated swarm is really dangerous

@tonysu8860

2 жыл бұрын

Not necessarily. Find a quadcopter nano quadcopter competition in your area aometime and have a bunch of them fly their quadcopters into you. And maybe take control of one yourself. You'll find that "malfunctioning" or even poorly functioning quadcopters are more an amusement than any threat to your physical well being.

@smiley4669

2 жыл бұрын

@@tonysu8860 Okay "Tony Su"

@dznuts123

2 жыл бұрын

Skynet 1.0? Sounds great

@Ahoooooooo

2 жыл бұрын

Once the swarm has reached enemies, it their problem how dangerous they are 🤐

@ChandranPrema123

2 жыл бұрын

Enemy Swarm in your AO

A valiant effort to highlight the use of drone technology in wars but NOT mentioning the most coveted of the Drone battle in mankind history: the Nagorno Karabakh war (2020)

@saiofficial437

2 жыл бұрын

Turkish Baytaktar TB2 did a main role in that war

@YMe-hp7hi

2 жыл бұрын

Tb2 is indeed battle proven

@TheMrgoodmanners

2 жыл бұрын

lol turkey is really struggling getting parts for its drones nowadays, 90% of its parts are from europe and canada

@ismailHossain-ln9ln

2 жыл бұрын

@@TheMrgoodmanners even now Canadaian company are crying cause they can't export their uav cameras. Now Türkei manufacturers and export this parts also.

@TheMrgoodmanners

2 жыл бұрын

@@ismailHossain-ln9ln lol they are certainly not crying. The only one that is is turkey. L3 has far bigger customers than turkey. Lets see what happens when the EU blocks ukraine from selling its engine parts to turkey

99% of the Chinese military is within the Chinese border. The US had over 800 military bases around the world with hundreds of thousands of soldiers outside it's territory, 300 of those bases encircling China.

@mashr4733

2 жыл бұрын

Thank you, Wikipedia

@troy4298

2 жыл бұрын

The PLA doesnt even have any experience any more, and the last time their troops were deployed was in tiananmen square 1989

@hagerawitube2449

2 жыл бұрын

Yet , it is the US who is worryed by Chinees Aggression ! like WTH ?

@troy4298

2 жыл бұрын

@@hagerawitube2449 because the chinese are the ones being agressive duh

@cheeseninja1115

2 жыл бұрын

@@hagerawitube2449 the US places bases in nations that ask for them to do so, the Chinese don't like the protection the US gives to its adversaries or lesser regional powers and has been pushing back. China is the aggressor as they are forcefully expanding while the US uses diplomacy and fear of Chinas aggression to gain even more military leverage in the region without threatening anyone out side of china *only* when China is agressive.

The US has lots of experience. That’s not something you should be proud of.

@theamazingyoutubewatchergu6838

2 жыл бұрын

China has experience too if you count the oppression of its own population by the ruling CCP.

@moxq2to

2 жыл бұрын

@@theamazingyoutubewatchergu6838 So you mean by bombing others makes USA a better nation than China? What I see is both of them are the bullies in the school.

@DATBOYBEN

2 жыл бұрын

China committing genocide isn't something you should be proud of.

@theamazingyoutubewatchergu6838

2 жыл бұрын

@@DATBOYBEN the fact so many people in the US are willing to look the other way on this because of money is disgusting.

@justinkase5260

2 жыл бұрын

@@theamazingyoutubewatchergu6838 The same can be said about US bombs in other countries.

When you money is not backed by gold but military power . Any other countries which are out of military reach will be cause for concern. China just wants to build enough military power to make any country think twice before they attack. China tec is getting better all the time and they are building up a nice group of countries to become allied with.

@georgecarlin2097

2 жыл бұрын

Not really. Iran is the only ally with any military projection capability. Maybe NK. Russia wouldnt likely have their back in an all out ww3 scenario but if they did recent events have displayed their weakness as well. Compare with US alliances which has NATO (Germany France UK etc.), Australia new Zealand Vietnam south Korea Japan Taiwan India etc.

@ibrahimn22

2 жыл бұрын

@@georgecarlin2097 Like is said the aim of the east is not to win ww3 but to prevent it from happening by making the cost too heigh For the western alliance. West is not defensive at all but a aggressive military economic alliance.

@georgecarlin2097

2 жыл бұрын

@@ibrahimn22 NATO is defensive only. Only the us had capabilities to project military capabilities over wide areas.

@DZ477

2 жыл бұрын

"China just wants to build enough military power to make any country think twice before they attack." This is just an echo of China's state-run propaganda message, a look at Taiwan would yield a clearer picture.

@ibrahimn22

2 жыл бұрын

@@DZ477 Taiwan is part of China when the UK start accepting military supplies by China to Scotland or Northern Ireland Even the Falkland islands then I would say you have a point . I don't see China supply weapons to catatonia in Spain. When will the west understand Like Russia China is willing to pay a higher price to keep Taiwan allied or natural just like Ukraine. West is all talk and postures they will not step in on Ukraine and same will happen to Taiwan.

DJI left the chat 😂

@weichenli2598

2 жыл бұрын

DJI: I'm just an ordinary technology company that makes civilian drones, so stop throwing grenades with drones.😂

And this is why China actually created and deployed Beidou, their version of GPS 🤔😉🤨

@defencebangladesh4068

2 жыл бұрын

yep

1:37 decrease the risk of human casualties, well it depends which human.

Swarm drones will be very effective to missile defense systems. It needs lots of missiles to destroy a group of swarm drones while it only need 1 drone to disrupt or destroy enemy missile defense installations that cost 1000x more than the swarm drones.

@saviobiogen9914

2 жыл бұрын

Yea, but those small drones are easier to be jamed, and are leas capable against radio electronic weapons and such measures.

@mdhasmatalimondal1216

2 жыл бұрын

A powerful EMP and your swarm is grounded .

@user-hj8mz3hp3s

2 жыл бұрын

And you fire c ram cannon and turno dose drones into junk

@sevrent2811

2 жыл бұрын

not really, guns that fire clouds of small projectiles can easily shoot down drone swarms. Rheinmetall already made one

@user-hj8mz3hp3s

2 жыл бұрын

@@sevrent2811 i mentioned it above you.Tungsten submunition is the solution to swarm drone probpem

Why can't we have the Chinese themselves talk about their drones?? And products??

@AAA-pf5bh

2 жыл бұрын

The defence ministry didn’t respond to a request for comment 5:28

@donchen4906

2 жыл бұрын

@iͥvͮaͣrͬoͦ Did good media make your country stronger?

@Ilovecruise

2 жыл бұрын

@@donchen4906 if the media are not bias and objective, then yes

@donchen4906

2 жыл бұрын

@@Ilovecruise If? So it is not then. Don't put your hope on if, it is just an assumption that far from being reality

@k.k.c8670

2 жыл бұрын

@iͥvͮaͣrͬoͦ the aim of US public relations in regard to this is to make the military industrial complex look good... So that the US can sell more weapons and stuff. It is a major American export industry. China, not so much. It does export some weapons but it's clearly not as aggressive in that regard.

For industrial countries such as China and the United States, simply comparing military spending is meaningless because their domestic purchasing power is different.

@flabber55tv83

2 жыл бұрын

But high quality

@birdangry5007

2 жыл бұрын

@@flabber55tv83 Yes, quality is important. Americans with high-quality weapons spent $2.231 trillion in Afghanistan, fought for more than 10 years, and did not eliminate the backward Taliban. On the contrary, they finally let the Taliban establish a government. Can you tell me why？I hope you can think independently. At the same time, people are more important. This is the reason why China was able to drive the Americans into the sea in the 1950 Korean War when its weapons lagged far behind the United States. As a Chinese, it is fair to say that the United States is leading in many traditional military fields (such as military engines). But the gap is already small. We can see these gaps and narrow them. On the contrary, China has advantages in some emerging fields (such as hypersonic weapons, space shuttle aircraft, etc.). The most important thing is that time is on China's side.

@tis_ace

2 жыл бұрын

@@birdangry5007 i can agree with most of what u said except for the shuttle part, us still operates the x 37 and has extensive knowledge from the space shuttle program, so givi g the advantage to china in that field just doesnt sit well with me

@flabber55tv83

2 жыл бұрын

And your saying china's drive the US?? In the ocean Big NO The UN was there to defend Korean border and guess what?? No one can go through in that front line and you saying time is now china's side sryly Did you think your country is unstoppable because you have hypersonic missile? And you think UN and NATO can stand a chance.?

@birdangry5007

2 жыл бұрын

@@tis_ace X 37 is not the same model as China's space shuttle. X 37 is a space shuttle that takes off vertically by rocket power. It glides and lands horizontally without power in the atmosphere. An aerospace plane can take off horizontally into space, and then land on the runway on its own power like an aircraft from space. The power system of the two is not a difficulty at all. For example, skyion, which uses a knife engine in Britain, is a combined power. Not to mention the separation technology of aircraft at hypersonic speed (Mach 25).

Drone tech is disruptive. The recent conflict near Turkey demonstrated the disruption. The cost effectiveness , in procurement, maintenance, training, deployment and logistics mean that all conflicts going forward will be dominated by drone tech. For aircraft , removing the limitations of the pilot greatly increases the capabilities of a platform. A lot of weight, space and air craft specifications go into keeping the human alive. The same is true for submarines. Flying drones off ships reduces the need for huge flight decks and the number of personal to service aircraft. Deploying ships with 20 to 30 attack drones, could see fast attack carriers the size of frigates or no carrier ships and drones working from land bases that can be setup in hours.

@WellBattle6

2 жыл бұрын

There hasn’t been a conflict where the opposing forces have had anti-drone jamming technology yet, so we still don’t know whether they would be prevalent in contested airspace in a high intensity conflict yet.

@ChrischanCPUGoddess

2 жыл бұрын

You don’t need ships to deploy these drones. They can launch from a soccer field anywhere in the world. Some are VTAL. When we looked at the numbers, shadow AVs alone can be anywhere in the world in 2 hours. Based off placement and handoff locations

@_OscarIvan

2 жыл бұрын

@Eswe Agreed

@georgiebrowntown7316

2 жыл бұрын

@Sin ZX you must be chinese. Because noone else really sees it that way. Besides china... and actions speak louder than words. That all sounds good and looks good on paper

@rfcdgaf

2 жыл бұрын

@Eswe The leek is a vegetable, a cultivar of Allium ampeloprasum, the broadleaf wild leek. The edible part of the plant is a bundle of leaf sheaths that is

How arrogant and funny to talk about China threat when us and UK aircraft carriers are on China's doorstep...

@louiswu6300

2 жыл бұрын

US: 800 military bases out door. China : 1 military base out door. and China wanna build a new one for trade route. US: China is a threat.

@altego016

2 жыл бұрын

It's arrogant and funny to talk about china threat when china is the one on other countries doorstep in the first place, like the Scarborough Shoal

@fuckdick3685

2 жыл бұрын

@@altego016 China is embarrassing itself

@user-fy3dw4dk9o

2 жыл бұрын

2016 South China Sea is a good memory, and you can only pretend in the end.

US has hundreds of models of UAVs, China has more than over 3000 models of UAVs. That is the fact based on the numbers!

@tommymikey5367

2 жыл бұрын

@M4g1T3cH Who did the Dji drone copy? India or America?

@JC-ew9ze

2 жыл бұрын

@M4g1T3cH you can go to wikipedia page of unmaned drone. It going to take you at least 10 minutes!

@JC-ew9ze

2 жыл бұрын

@M4g1T3cH based on your coment,you don't know anything about chinese manufacture and logistic at all. The reason iphone can only produce China and make sense and make money. One iphone need thousand of supply channels to assemble to one phone. China has the complete supply channel that can produce cheaply and allow US Apple to make insane profit. Same thing with unmanned drone. China has enough manpower and supply channel. In a long run, China win.

@JC-ew9ze

2 жыл бұрын

@M4g1T3cH Are you smarter or richer than elon musk? See musk said about china. kzread.info/dash/bejne/h2x-29NpoK2ogMY.html

@wallingnaga6563

2 жыл бұрын

@Misc??? Same shape as predator drone doesn’t make it a PREDATOR drone !! Aerodynamics of a drone is the same and predator drone are very good aerodynamic design so it’s obviously other countries will follow suit , the same applies to F22/35 design too !! Indian Rustom-2 looks like a Predator drone too but it doesn’t mean India stole US drone design!! The Wheel argument is the best here , you can’t complain about someone who made a wheel saying it’s your idea !! People can’t have a Square wheel !

Nice video.

Okay this is terrible research by WSJ. They said at the end that we don't have a drone in the US arsenal that is the flying wing design. In fact, we have multiple. The RQ-170, RQ-180, X-47B and whatever other classified drones. These have been in service or in active testing for years now. If you're gonna make videos about the U.S. Military get real experts.

@yewsingooi9573

2 жыл бұрын

Even DJI supply drone for US military. US have drones? Mehh

@misterniceguy7997

2 жыл бұрын

@@yewsingooi9573 US have many Hightech Drones that China Copy it

@misterniceguy7997

2 жыл бұрын

@@yewsingooi9573 China dont have own Design hahaha... China always Copying US Technology., look at the US and the Chinese Drones its the same., anyway the B-21 Stealth Bomber is coming and 6th Generation Unmanned Fighter Jets also coming., there is 2 Types of US 6th Generation Unmanned Stealth Fighter Jets from the US., lets see what can do the Chinese Copycat Drones., but for the US that is an Old Drones (MQ 9 Reaper)

@shengchen4553

2 жыл бұрын

@@misterniceguy7997 hightech and copy. Lolllllll. Do u mean USA High tech is so easy to copy. Or ONLY China is able to COPY USA HIGH TECH. Or USA is so USELESS to protect its HIGH-tech. Or China is too powerful to steal USA High tech from USA. We also deployed our own hypersonic missile. Same as Russia. That must be another steal….. Wait, The USA is still struggling testing and failed. OK, China steal it from the future. That make sense.

@tophatv2902

2 жыл бұрын

@@shengchen4553 You are coping hard. you could even make your own humvee without making a copy lol.

The best drones are build by DJI in China and not the Chinese military.

@politicalreal7813

2 жыл бұрын

False

@KejriwalBhakt

2 жыл бұрын

@@politicalreal7813 And the truth is?

@joyzhou1604

2 жыл бұрын

Have you been to a show called: before? My best friend saw Shen Yun before pandemic, she told me this was the first time she was moved to tears in a stage live show, So finally, I went to see Shen Yun with my whole family two months ago, I cried also---, What a great show! Actually I hadn’t believed a dance show would touch her heart so deeply until I watched it in real: brave, hope, warm, encouragement, energy, responsibility---, it’s hard to describe how I benefit from this two-hour show, but one thing I am sure is I won’t be beaten down no matter how difficult in the future life, I will never give up!

The military-industrial complex now need more money! Lol :P

I don't know why they a re comparing the GJ-11 to the B2 spirit. A much better comparison is the american RQ-170.

Military version of: you can copy my homework, just don't make it obvious

WSJ is trying to help the Pentagon getting more budget. It does need public helps on politics. China itself is helping too, holding large amount of US government debt, providing strategic material such as rare earth …

@steevesdd

2 жыл бұрын

US narrative making China the enemy while also being their supply chain seems absurd. Spend money to protect your supply chain from China when China is your supply.

@ismailHossain-ln9ln

2 жыл бұрын

right

@ikGREENY

2 жыл бұрын

@@steevesdd Whatever we export to or import from China we make huge profit on, which means a lot more money for our military than them. We already have this tech developed but aren’t worried about perception of power like the beta male communist Chinese govt so we don’t tell all our secrets to the media and show all them in demonstrations. Quit looking at the surface level info you receive as the full picture.. cuz in reality you just sound dumb.

@benganchan1420

2 жыл бұрын

@@ikGREENY america’s debt trap as of 6 December 2021 is $28,000,000,000,000 with a huge outlay going into military spending . Blame successive incoming american governments for the past 2 decades . Politicians divide a people according to their agendas, and when the votes are counted , it results in a hung democracy , which is an unworkable government. Happened /happening in america , canada, germany ,india, malaysia ….

Insane n valuable information

Can area denial using directed energy stop drone swarm tactic? any opinion please

30 years from now when bioweapon and ai is greatly improved and natural resource is in crisis, damage from war can be devastating

@Pfyzer

2 жыл бұрын

if everyone played by the rule, then bioweapons wouldnt be an issue[HOPEFULLY].... automated killings machines however, that's another story..... cuz blackhat hackers will see this as an amazing once in a life time hunt

America can produces 100 drone monthly and China produces 1,000 drones of the same kind in a month on a normal production days. On the same time China are producing a wide variety of drones for different application.

@user-wg9zq1ee8f

2 жыл бұрын

I'm Chinese, and China's weapons are toys and plagiarism, and there is no deterrent.

@patatebanine4278

Жыл бұрын

Source of what you say. Where you find that USA (not America btw) produces 100 drone monthly and China 1000?

"Explosion of creativity" Right

@MyWickedSmile

2 жыл бұрын

Keep thinking that we Chinese people are unimaginative drones who can’t innovate. We would love your whole military to underestimate ours as well.

@compassroses

2 жыл бұрын

@@MyWickedSmile Nah, we KNOW that the Chinese steal other nations' technological advances, and then add tweaks.

@bright5801

2 жыл бұрын

@@MyWickedSmile I believe that the Chinese people are very creative but they need to show it by coming up with different unique designs

@Dwg256

2 жыл бұрын

646

@erickariuki6842

2 жыл бұрын

Taliban!!!

I really like love 😍 this channel

the female analyst sounded like a drone.

Interesting to see Western and Eastern competition.

Just on the road.

Cross naval CIWS with the M134. Mount a half-dozen guns linearly on towable platforms. 360-degree low-cost low-weight swarm defense. Or just use lasers.

I’m assuming a big factor is that here in the states we contract companies and China does not?

@dracoii1147

2 жыл бұрын

They aren’t allowed to give info to other countries but China usually hacks in

@proger1960

2 жыл бұрын

@@dracoii1147 Umm well you see they sometimes do secretly, or China uses an American ally like Israel and bribe them to take critical American tech away.

@emanuelbabayagaortiz7333

2 жыл бұрын

@@proger1960 it’s probably old military techs or former chief operators during manufacturing. After their contract they’ll run off and sell secrets. I’ve looked at job requirements to work for big defense industries. They basically ask for someone who is either a college study prodigy or some science teacher with a very fun hobby and budget. Someone who so versed from python to Java, c+. Electronics maintain eye and fluid mechanics degrees. 10+ in professional portfolios. Be formerly a tss/secret level holder… I still can’t figure out if they are offering a management position because the pay is like 100-1200k a year. You’re better off with all that experience running for President like Putin. But chances are that’s where the actual classwardare start between private citizens businessmen and those black suits chief security officers of the nsa/cia bakc operations command. There’s no over the net hack, you can’t send a file to overload someone’s network… you’d first have to be there, like opening a email… but not clicking the link or downloading the attachment first…. Think about this. Look at border patrol agent jobs or atf agent jobs. Those jobs you can’t sign up for, you’d have to work hard and hope they have a interest in your department. Even then you can still seem too greedy to want to help Uncle Sam. There’s a article that said the cia needs to stop hunting Chinese spies in academia. But China were the first to test quantum satellites in space and the US were studying photonics copying. Which I thought was impossible since you can take a element and copy it. Specially if it’s used to send a message on a quantum level. The things that keep me up at night….

@proger1960

2 жыл бұрын

@@emanuelbabayagaortiz7333 Honestly true , I mean both China and America do work together on their evil deeds however the media shows them against one another.

@emanuelbabayagaortiz7333

2 жыл бұрын

@@proger1960 google Alexandra Forsythe. She’s this cute red head who’s like 20 years old that got summer camp jobs are Nasa/Raytheon. She’s now a lead engineer at Intel. America is headed to the public side of technology just as China is moving to the military side of this international theater. We can better start learning mandarin

So, some of these are going to be autonomous. Well, we know where that's heading.

@forgaoqiang

2 жыл бұрын

The terminator

The point that most viewers need to take home after watching this clip can be found at 0:38 "China's military spending is lower than the US"

@N0_F1le

2 жыл бұрын

@David Moore *laugh in a much more corrupted China Goverment*

@kavorka8855

2 жыл бұрын

The figures are based on the official sources. The difference between a fascist system and a democracy, in the latter you cannot hide lies for long, whereas in the former, you can lie and even teach 1.4 billion people false history.

@FloofyMinari

2 жыл бұрын

Chinese Private defense contractors are more beholden to the PRC than American contractors. The U.S also has a lot more regulation, higher labor costs, etc etc.

@lvjinbin28

2 жыл бұрын

@@N0_F1le China will be always more than corrupted as long as lobbying is illegal.

@N0_F1le

2 жыл бұрын

@David Moore let me tell you china goverment love to lie about their military spending just look at the navy and the air assets they have tell me that the spending they given are just incorrect and the china goverment is even more corrupted as the goverment eat most of the money before it even went to the intended purpose and even then the company from the goverment that is tasked to do thing, do it and too take money for the spending

China could probably design better military tech if they have similar military budget with the US

@VoidSpace9

2 жыл бұрын

We do have similar budget, but you just don't know it yet...

@twinsrock15

2 жыл бұрын

Why does China need a bigger military budget when they just steal everything.

@nobody2874

2 жыл бұрын

@@twinsrock15 hahahahahha coming from the us aahahhahahahhaha You just made my day buddy

@joaopedroalbernaz

2 жыл бұрын

@Dimaz You need to change "design" to "steal"

@Zov631

2 жыл бұрын

@@twinsrock15 Do you really have any classified information to prove their “stealing” lol

Since when has "war" been about limiting human casualties?

The author of this video sounds like an amateur on military equipment development process. “Reliability” is THE MOST IMPORTANT aspect for military equipments. It is well written in the requirement section of the document for every piece of equipment. Besides, we are still far from developing an AI that has self awareness so calm down.

I think an advancement in drone technology will lead to self flawn planes

Y is WSJ so obsessed with China?

All I know is every drone on Amazon is made in China. Actually Amazon is pretty much made in China.

@DY-fy2jh

2 жыл бұрын

So is every other retailer.

@pttyyjz8276

2 жыл бұрын

man we own DJI

@edwardlaw797

2 жыл бұрын

@@pttyyjz8276 If we own DJI, then we shouldn't be limiting their sells in our military space. There is such a thing as "Google" to find out who owns DJI.

@pttyyjz8276

2 жыл бұрын

@@edwardlaw797 Bro I’m not ur side…

The question should be how many woman and children have the US drone killed compare to China drones.

how about signals that confuses enemies' technologies? none was said about that.

All u need is a disrupt frequency n u can jam most drones

When you just look at this you can't help but think humans are very creative in making killing weapons

@futurecorpse7330

2 жыл бұрын

Heard a quote one time don’t remember who said it but they said mice don’t build their own mouse traps

@leky1325

2 жыл бұрын

A knife could could be use to cut food or to kill, depends who's wielding it.

Go China!

Love it

Why does the sound like the opening plot of I have no mouth and I must scream

that academic lady sounded painfully spergy

wasnt the US navy testing a delta(stealthish) drone, but eventually just chose a conventional wing drone for their refueling mission, and wasnt it supposed to have anti-sub capabilities?

@skyejamss

2 жыл бұрын

Mq-25?

@hoosteen1597

2 жыл бұрын

Yeah do you mean the rq180? That is a flying wing drone in development (or operational already). Idk why wsj chose to focus on like 2 Chinese drones when there are hundreds of new American drones in development rn but classified

@riz82k97

2 жыл бұрын

@@hoosteen1597 yes it’s the RQ-170 and it’s been operational since at least 2011 when it was captured by the Iranian military which is prob whr China got their design for their flying wing drone from

Ang pangontra diyan sa swarm drones pasabugin sa gitna o gamitan ng steel net na parang nanghuhuling ng lamok o gamitan ng magnetic gun para magdikit at sumabog

it would be interested to compare the cost effectiveness of both military industries, I am going to bet China is more cost effective than USA. USA has spent too much resources to maintain the existing system, and not enough to develop into future systems.

@victorwang7974

2 жыл бұрын

Their "large" budget is for maintaining overseas military bases

0:38 Wow that seems very disproportionate to their GDP difference

@Rex-ww4cw

2 жыл бұрын

China has always kept their military budget on 1% of their gdp until not long ago they decided to increase a little bit more

You may find some truth from this video. US: "Today, it flies a fleet of thousands of drones that are operated in countries including Iraq, Pakistan and Afganistan." China: "Chinese military spending is lower than the US. Chinese drones don't have as much battlefield experiences as the America-Made ones. Chinese military hasn't used their drones in a real warfare."

@dznuts123

2 жыл бұрын

yet people ignore the real aggressor, which is the us

@rashidaquil5284

2 жыл бұрын

Why do unnecessary killing including native Americans... it is unjust and murder

@tonysu8860

2 жыл бұрын

Actually, China itself isn't known to have successfully used drones in warfare. A number of customer countries have tried to or actually flown drones, the most successful seem to be the ones that are very unsophisticated and tiny, little more than what you can buy form DJI. The military drones China has tried to sell so far have had major reliability problems, almost can't even successfully fly once and perform a mission of any type.

@xinyiquan666

2 жыл бұрын

stop BS, chinese drones have been entensively used in middle east and africa warfare since 2000s, ignorent, they were sold in tens of thousands to those countries such as syria and iraq and saqid arab and egypt and lybia, they have been intensively used in wars espeically in syria war, and have highest success rate in warfare, they shot down lots of drones and other targets from USA and turkey, go search videos on youtube ,chinese drones used in middle east, US made drones are gabages...

@xinyiquan666

2 жыл бұрын

@@tonysu8860 stop BS and making up stories, , Chinese drones is largest and most succcessful in world, chinese drones are sold in highest numbers in world, US drone has very few exports and no one wants to buy US drone, it is expensive and very unreliable, thats why US can not have any companies like chinese DJI that is world most advanced drone company and largest sellor of drones, US can not even make good civil drones , let alone military drones, US drones never had any successful mission and all crashed or shot down by countris such as iran or syria, it is junk, thats why china is NO1 drone seller both military and civil products.

Given that I currently question whether Ukraine's allies are having to rethink which artillery and ammunition Ukraine needs in light of Elon Musk pulling out some Starlink GPS support previously provided, I'm wondering about what tech designa are focusing on and accomplishing diversified ways&means for location targeting (detection plus responsive actions). What updated info can your offer re this?

I like the swept wings. Looks as fast as an English Electric Lightning. I think Russians have patent on the strut-tail combination

The lady talks about failures, like you know: killing an entire family of 10, including 7 children, in Kabul, August the 29 2021?

Show us how we use Space Command to shoot down satellites please! Also updates on the X-Wing and Tie-Fighters under development. Long Live The Military Industrial Complex Dapra is my Daddy ;-)

That's y z world is not steady because competition and fighting to become super power of z world which is a huge problem to z world

This technology is just taking of

In fact, an important reason why China is vigorously developing drones is that it lacks enough pilots. Unlike the United States, where there is a wide range of private aircraft, the Chinese do not have a similar history. So drones can help the Chinese get around this shortcoming. China's industrial capacity is relatively strong (industrial output equivalent to the United States + Germany + Japan), so a mass-produced drone, combined with China's developing artificial intelligence technology, would be an excellent overtaking.

@BS-vm5bt

Жыл бұрын

It depends on the future, the EU has been extremely de militarized for very long time with a extremely low military budget. Right now the EU re-arming again with the possibility of a EU army that can mass produce to a way larger extent then the US primary because it got double the population with similar gdp. The US is the only western military force that got a military budget over 2%. Japan, sk, EU are close to doubling its military spending this will impossible for china to overtake. The combined forces of the EU, US, Commonwealth, japan, south korea and taiwan. Maybe china might surpass the US in the future but I highly doubt china will surpass that combined force even with russia and iran. Russia mobilized all those nations after the invasion of ukrain. I hate this idiotic militarized world but that is what both the US and russia wanted so they can justify their 3% and higher gdp spending on the military.

@texasray5237

Жыл бұрын

@@BS-vm5bt The US likes to flash that military budget/gdp ratio because it makes them look big and strong. But there is another ratio that is much more relevant and pertinent, and that is military budget / BoP (balance of payment) That ratio killed the USSR and it will kill the USA very soon.

@changchadchanamdong2668

Жыл бұрын

​@@BS-vm5bt. Idiot m you talk like all of tthem well unite against china is a real ear. Lol

@MeanJackal

6 ай бұрын

i have always thought about this. if china don't have enough pilots why not built more advanced combat drones and combine it with ai? it's much cheaper and safer than conventional fighter jets

@SerpentCommando

5 ай бұрын

​@@BS-vm5btNot much, China manpower outnumbered U.S and EU combined. Mass production might take a long time to establish in Europe, but it's easier im China where they have too many worker.

Imagine talking about drones and no mention of RQ180

@IllusiveDude

2 жыл бұрын

right ?

@Frosty_357

2 жыл бұрын

Why there is no photo or design reveal?

@joyzhou1604

2 жыл бұрын

Have you been to a show called: before? My best friend saw Shen Yun before pandemic, she told me this was the first time she was moved to tears in a stage live show, So finally, I went to see Shen Yun with my whole family two months ago, I cried also---, What a great show! Actually I hadn’t believed a dance show would touch her heart so deeply until I watched it in real: brave, hope, warm, encouragement, energy, responsibility---, it’s hard to describe how I benefit from this two-hour show, but one thing I am sure is I won’t be beaten down no matter how difficult in the future life, I will never give up!

The way that Elsa lady talks, reminds me of Ace Ventura Pet Detective.

Non-profit means non-taxable

China's development and advanced technology have frightened the United States. The US military is now competing not only with Russia but also with China. Problems for the United States could be serious in the future.

@JigilJigil

2 жыл бұрын

You have no idea what are you speaking about, they are still struggling to make reliable engine for their fighters, they are not even able to make an airliner after 3 decades of trying and spending 100s billions of dollars, their comac airliner is totally dependant on American and European companies and suppliers, and Russia is third world country at least 4 decades behind US in every aspect of military technologies, US made their 5th gen fighter 20 years ago and Russia still striving to do so, even Russian military technology was mocked by India for lacking any advanced capabilities.

@robinlindberg1231

2 жыл бұрын

US is certainly not competing with Russia. Have you not seen the Ukraine invasion?

@tmgblaster6453

Жыл бұрын

*_As an Indian 🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳 Chinese product is better than USA product, it's real, CHINESE PRODUCT 85%, USA PRODUCT 15% ONLY_*

@yoriel4962

10 ай бұрын

😂 oh, please if it wasn’t for stealing data they would even be close…. Yet, there’s still way behind as some have stated. They can’t even build their own jet engines

At least Chinese drones don’t kills innocent people like US drones. A good example are Afghanistan wars, how many innocent people have they kills but not punish for their actions !!!

@animatedstory3460

2 жыл бұрын

40k + kills

I like how they said this is domination when all they do is make some lower-quality copy of the US military equipment...

I think bayraktar tb2 is the best

China lacks war experience, the US not only has the technology it also has the experience! Huge win by the US🇺🇸

@user-wr8sm6jp6j

2 жыл бұрын

However, the United States cannot eliminate the Taliban guerrillas. Where is your so-called actual combat experience?😅😅😅

@dogandcat8475

2 жыл бұрын

US has the experience,may be you want to say US like war.

@johnnyg6448

2 жыл бұрын

@@dogandcat8475 yes we do 🇺🇸🇺🇸

@dogandcat8475

2 жыл бұрын

@@johnnyg6448 Yes you do. And kill 18 kids in Texas. Congratulations.

@paniniman6524

Жыл бұрын

The us has experience losing for sure.

Advancement in two different countries is not measurable only by the amount of investment but by the effectiveness of investment. US vs Chinese labor cost, logistic etc. as an example. Judging by the amount of domestic hostility (propaganda) in the US, China seems to be already on par with the US or will be on par sooner then expected.

@dracoii1147

2 жыл бұрын

No it isn’t for example usa made hypersonic drones in the 1970s while china is trying to make them rn

@zenpai5998

2 жыл бұрын

@@dracoii1147 some people just don’t understand how far advanced the US is to China and will remain given China has a lot of crisis’s developing

@cresengcianamagsino7043

2 жыл бұрын

@@zenpai5998 china has hypersonic missiles now while USA doesn't have one🤣🤣😜😝

@truthseeker7853

2 жыл бұрын

Us is 10 steps behind in technology compare to China.

@blitz_Itz

2 жыл бұрын

@@zenpai5998 China has HIGH-Speed rail while the US doesn't even have a meter of it. Why are westerners so proud?

The reasons drones have become a big thing is not many countries have a response to it. Ukraine have used millions of dollars worth of surface to air missiles to knock down a few thousand dollars worth of drone.

Drop it like it's hot 🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥

well done china

@underscore2002

2 жыл бұрын

well done? for destroying the muslim population of uyghur?

@triggerost9023

2 жыл бұрын

@@underscore2002 Better than destroying countries in the middle east.

@poopdownthedrain3819

2 жыл бұрын

@@triggerost9023 both are equally terrible… tf are you on about?

GJ-11 looks sorta similar to the RQ-170 except armed

@nesseihtgnay9419

2 жыл бұрын

Of course, china copys

@wanglaugh9932

2 жыл бұрын

Most of cars have four wheels and look the same.

@hellothere1656

2 жыл бұрын

@@nesseihtgnay9419 Everyone copies. Airbus a320 looks like a Boeing 737. A BMW and a Ford both have 4 wheels. What exactly is ur point? China wanted a stealth drone, so it made one with a flying wing design to make it as stealthy as possible. But because rq170 uses the same flying wing design, you call China GJ11 a "copy"... so is the b2 bomber a copy of Nazi Germany's Horten bomber?

What real war experience are you talking about? What is the practical difference between blowing up an undefended Iraqi mud house and blowing up a target mud house in the Chinese desert? Except, there are people living in the house that was bombed by the United States.

better you use aircraft piloted by human pilot. drones need satellite or some ground controlling station

@kimeli

2 жыл бұрын

AI?

Over the years we've seen that when it comes to military spending it's not so much about how much you spend bit what you spend it on.

@lowrezwater4933

2 жыл бұрын

You can't really use this against america because they spend so much and spend it so well.

@philflip1963

2 жыл бұрын

@@lowrezwater4933 You've gotta be kidding! 8 Trillion missing from the Pentagon budget?

@jacer5677

2 жыл бұрын

@@lowrezwater4933 indeed the money is spent so well. but USA is funding hundreds of military bases abroad while China does not. meaning it is very likely that the budget used for innovation may be very close to each other

@robinlindberg1231

2 жыл бұрын

@@philflip1963 Almost as if instead of showing off the latest tech to brag to the rest of the world, they keep it a secret.

@randomguy7175

Жыл бұрын

American military spends on gender studies 😂

she looks just like a real person amazing tech they need to get the smile right tho

"There's low risk of human casualties" *PROCEEDS TO DRONE STRIKE CHILDREN*

I thought I was seeing a comparison here, but what I'm shown here is clearly a Chinese drone advertisement.

Attack of the drones

I just order DJI Avata

I am just earlier than their drones.

1,000 billion... 😂😂😂 You guys using That number in your spending chart is a sure sign of sophistication and superiority.

@robinlindberg1231

2 жыл бұрын

Using 1,000 followed by billion or million is common.

摸着鹰酱过河😂😂😂

You should look at Turkish Military Drones too.

@fucky889

2 жыл бұрын

They don’t have the range

@JogBird

2 жыл бұрын

@@fucky889 the range is fine, Turkey isnt waging war halfway across the world

@fucky889

2 жыл бұрын

@@JogBird those drones made by turkey are only useful if fighting an adversary that doesn’t have drones or a proper Air Force.

@amachuseyin

2 жыл бұрын

@@fucky889 no

@wasser5686

2 жыл бұрын

@@fucky889 turkish drones are effective. thats the key. they are cheap and they work. and they are battle proven already. chinese drones were also used in libya, but not as effective and way more expensive.

20th Century: Globalization will solve world hunger Globalization:

If launch mac tark shou watt matting geit balt same toke mist mant meaning laik comfort fun early. Say fleet.

If the US can’t even win Vietnam, how can it win China with these?

@bruh5361

2 жыл бұрын

Literally comparing apples and bananas. PS: China also lost in Vietnam shortly after the US retreated.

@GeraldoluizAprendiz

2 жыл бұрын

You can consider Korea and Afghanistan too. And no, US will not fight China in a military conflict. Despite all tough talk on both sides. China is not the usual target for america's military power (3rd world countries with no real military capacity) China is already to big to be enganged in a military conflict by anyone. And remenber that China has defeated US forces in a very important battle in the Korean War and thus keept the north Korea out of reach for Uncle SAM (China has made a movie about this recently and is a big hit in some countries of Asia). And China was a very poor country back on those days. Now it is different. Only if absolutly necessary a matter of life or death for the US we will see a direct confrontation and that does not include Taiwan. Let alone the fact that China is crucial partner for US economy like it or not and also for Europe and most countries in the world to be correct. China is not looking for a war either. They have a very clear strategy: to become the richest country in the world and a war is the last thing they need. No, no war in the horizon but the military indutrial complex is happy as never before.

@grassyvillain9549

2 жыл бұрын

@@bruh5361 no, China retreat very quickly after doing the danger. US should have done the same, but they stay there like a fool.

@grassyvillain9549

2 жыл бұрын

@@bruh5361 And also Vietnam never win, they pay a much Heavier price than US and China

@r3dpowel796

2 жыл бұрын

@@bruh5361 nope china did not launch full scale invasion into vietnam it tries to annex small region of vietnam because of pol pot. but by that point the vietnamese army were ready for ambush.

I hope there won't be a war between China and the US. The US can drop its aggressive strategy and adapt to China's rise. The differences in underlying logic between the East and the West cause a lot of misunderstandings. China is an agricultural civilization and wants a peaceful environment and fair competition. Do not provoke us. The West is a pirate civilization and wants to plunder and colonize. Although the two cultures are difficult to understand,hope they try their best to live in peace without interfering with each other.

@robinlindberg1231

2 жыл бұрын

"China wants a peaceful environment." Like Uyghur muslims trying to live in peace?

@user-fy3dw4dk9o

2 жыл бұрын

@@robinlindberg1231 It's like your media feeds you garbage, and you take it as the truth.

@user-fy3dw4dk9o

2 жыл бұрын

@@robinlindberg1231 You clowns don't even dare to travel to Xinjiang and ask the locals.

@justinacioffi8740

Жыл бұрын

Ready when you are !

Does dji make military drones?

@TL-fe9si

2 жыл бұрын

LOL, they'll be sanctioned before even thinking about it

'Roger Roger!' Just jam their communications, and the drones won't be able to coordinate.