Now this is called a review for the end user. Crystal clear. Conceptual difference well explained.

@dheeraj3945

10 ай бұрын

The reason why I add "Motoroids" in the end of KZread search

@motoroids

10 ай бұрын

Thanks 😊

@motoroids

10 ай бұрын

Thanks

@billesbacon

9 ай бұрын

Excellent review and has helped me in my decision.

Beautiful bike!!! As a 50 years old beginner (1,82 cm high with 110kg weight) looking for his first bike, love this scrambler!!! Will do 70% commuting (town, work etc..) and 30% touring... Do you thing that bike can do some light touring? Thanx and regards from far away Serbia :)

@motoroids

9 ай бұрын

Love from India! It can do some touring for sure

Great review. Well articulated and detailed, especially the difference between speed 400 and this scrambler. Although they are two different kind of bikes altogether. A lot of us wanted to know what has actually been changed and what are the differences. Kudos..! Appreciate your work..!

@motoroids

10 ай бұрын

Thanks

RE Guerilla or Triumph scrambler for high speed stability? How much it is different

20 min biased video for speed 400, I appreciate your analysis but its totally wrong for this bike! kudos to triumph they have given a complete bike for Indian roads though people who don't tour won't go for this and if it looks big and feel heavy then definitely it includes something strong inside for which it is 30k extra, I own 390 adv and I know riding it in lower gear is very difficult or not every time a person is looking for a pace so here we are getting everything top speed, lower revs, a good looking bike which KTM and Himalyan failed to deliver If you want to compare it.......compare it with other brands those who have the same purpose but failed to deliver everything like this

@motoroids

10 ай бұрын

Well, I genuinely believe that the Speed is a more accomplished motorcycle overall. It was, therefore important to spell out the differences. I have no reason to have any bias. And I have also very clearly spelled out the users for whom the Scrambler is more suited

Thanks for bringing out the difference of this bike with Speed 400 Amit!!.. It will definitely not be as good as Speed in acceleration or handling or cornering or braking!!.. I knew this already & henced picked Speed 400 2 months ago already 🤷‍♀️

@motoroids

10 ай бұрын

Great choice. Congratulations

@crazybikinifighter

10 ай бұрын

Sounds like sour grapes.

@yourdad4903

9 ай бұрын

The emoji u used here is womens plzz use mens emoji

Which is Better? Dominar 400 or Scrambler 400X It has been a dream of mine to purchase Dominar400 since the touring addition came out! But now I'm confused Please help

@motoroids

10 ай бұрын

Triumph is better

@FirePhoenix1701

9 ай бұрын

I face the exact same dilemma. In 2017, when both FZ25 and Dominar 400 were new to the market, I went for FZ25 after a lot of contemplation. Now, I face the same dilemma in choosing between Dominar 400 and Scrambler 400X. Dominar: Positives: Better headlights, better wind shield (would certainly prevent a lot of windblast, no doubt). I will certainly be able to flat-foot at stops. Pillion seat with seat rest looks like a much safer option. Although service quality may be an issue according to various reviews, they have still got plenty of service centers everywhere. We have kind of minimum guarantee. Negatives: Suspension (only if we compare with Scrambler), complaint about the turning radius (people saying it is difficult to maneuver, especially at low speeds and all). Scrambler: Positives: (As per reviews)..Better suspension, good sitting posture. Better torque. Looks amazing. More flickable/agile than Dominar based on various reviews. Negatives: Service center availability is a cause of concern. Not sure how much wind blast do we have to face on the highway. I have seen Dominar comfortably doing high speeds in the range of 120 kmph. Can the Scrambler do the same without much vibrations? As someone who is just over 5'9, I am not sure about flat-footing on the Scrambler. I need to test ride both before making the final decision. It is going to be another long contemplation for me I believe 😂

That very nice review of exactly what is required to clarify

@motoroids

3 ай бұрын

Thanks

This review is solely like a comparison video with the speed instead of really looking into the versatility of it. Brakes are blunt for a reason, low end torque is more for off road, etc. And the maneuvering and riding ergonomics are top notch. I feel the review missed out on the basic purpose of this bike. All the other reviews stated that the suspension is a bit too soft but here it is said as stiff, so it's questionable? Could have added more points on the rev bands and the power delivery on each gear, missed the tractability of the engine where it can go low speeds with high gears without any knocking. On a first glance the review looks like the bike is non par but what I think what you are actually doing is comparing it solely with speed 400 and nothing else.

@motoroids

9 ай бұрын

The information you have required is right there in the video.

Most of the points mentioned by you are completely opposite to what many others have said. I am now confused about whom to trust and whom to not. A simple test ride would not help. Any suggestions are welcome. :)

Wow its a scrambler and 1st half max of the time you spoke about cornering ability woww😂

the best and most honest review of this bike... AMAZINGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG

@motoroids

10 ай бұрын

Thanks

Nice review thanks! Would you care to comment on engine vibrations over 100km/hr--i hear conflicting views on this. I am looking to use this bike for a touring bike.cheers

@motoroids

10 ай бұрын

It’s within tolerable limits

Very well presented review. Covered almost all the aspects in detail. I am confused between the Triumph Scrambler 400 and the KTM Adventure 390 X as both are around the same price bracket and. Need a do it all bike for both city riding as well as long distance touring for long term. Which one would be better amongst these 2 for a single Bike garage ?

@motoroids

10 ай бұрын

Wait for the new KTM Adv

@kennethbavisi8969

10 ай бұрын

​@@motoroidsThanks for the reply but there's still a lot of time for the new Adv 390 to launch, probably in late 2024 or early 2025. I don't want to wait that long and would be purchasing/booking by this year end. So kindly suggest which one I should go for ?

hi what would you suggest CB350RS OR SCRAMBLER 400X for major city travel and occasional touring?

@motoroids

8 ай бұрын

CB350 is easier to ride and relaxed

Thank you. Very detailed and well presented. I scrolled through all your videos and found that the Suzuki Vstrom review never happened. Perhaps now is a good time, comparing these two on mountain touring front esp low end performance, pillion and luggage, and how the engine differences matter. The Vstrom is what I'm eyeing if this seems short of expectations.

@motoroids

10 ай бұрын

I did the Vstrom. Check again please

@motoroids

10 ай бұрын

Vstrom is a great bike IMHO, you can buy it

@vibhupande

10 ай бұрын

@@motoroids You mean a review of the vstrom SX250? Can't find it... just the preview video abt the sx250 is there on your channel.

can we get the same speed 400 graphics on tank to scrambler ?

@motoroids

10 ай бұрын

No

6ft3 Guy, no off roading, few tours and daily commute. Speed vs scrambler which one to go far?. For most parts speed fits very well, only height is holding me from speed (may i should ignore?).

@aundzousa

7 ай бұрын

scrambler for sure, I m of same height test ride both, scrambler is way ahead for our height and easy to ride

Nice review,i would like to know if it will be small or ok for me.I am 6.1 feet and 92kgr.Thank you

@motoroids

9 ай бұрын

It'll be perfect

Thanks for the in-depth review, Amit... you folks rock :)

@motoroids

10 ай бұрын

Our pleasure!

How come the engine braking is more agressive? What has changed here?!

I am looking forward to mine arriving in the states this January.

Would changing both tyres to softer rubber increase cornering capability and make it more flickable?

@motoroids

9 ай бұрын

Will increase the corner capability marginally, but won't make it more flickable

Which color did u like the most

@motoroids

9 ай бұрын

Khaki

@86adilshaikh66

9 ай бұрын

Okay

What’s the milage on city roads?

Needs 50/50 tires. My riding is about that.

How is the brake Can i live with it right.......a person who is upgrading fron 160 cc bike looking to discover long ride and off roading and using it for regular city commute will this work or should I wait for himalayan

@motoroids

9 ай бұрын

This is a decent bike. Himalayan can be better, but from the looks of it, it won't be as versatile as this

bhai bahut hi badhiya review..

Should I wait for RE 452 or book this... Understand that boht machines have different philosophy but as Indian... Value for Money is utmost...

Awesome review 🙏

@motoroids

8 ай бұрын

Thanks

The seat height is going to be deal breaker for many people whose are below 5.7'

@motoroids

9 ай бұрын

That’s true

@user-rf9me7xm1w

9 ай бұрын

Yes, you’re right, this is yet another bike which is unsuitable for me.

Sir is it good for city use

@motoroids

9 ай бұрын

Yes, if you're tall

I want proper scrambler exhaust on it

Best review yet

@motoroids

9 ай бұрын

Thanks

I find this review a little absurd, scrambler is a different kind of motorcycle and speed 400 is different, why do much comparison?

Is itworth spending over speed a 30 to 40 thousand, for just better road presence.........

@motoroids

10 ай бұрын

If it matters to you, then yes

Bro interceptor or duke ?? Need a reliable bike with good reasonable comfort and really good performance that can make each ride happy

@anurajtirkey

10 ай бұрын

Go for interceptor

@motoroids

10 ай бұрын

The new Duke 390 is phenomenal

@mindbuster121431

10 ай бұрын

thanks bro. will check it out tomorrow

@pravinmurthy

10 ай бұрын

Duke easily..

179 kg wet on scrambler.

Nice review

@motoroids

10 ай бұрын

Thanks

Great Review 🚀

How is it for city rides?

@motoroids

10 ай бұрын

It's good for City

Thanks for bringing a red bike. Other colours are stealthy to camera.

@motoroids

10 ай бұрын

Thanks

Interesting revelations indeed ❤

@motoroids

9 ай бұрын

Thanks

Is the scrambler a bit laggy in acceleration

@motoroids

9 ай бұрын

As compared to the Speed yes

@86adilshaikh66

9 ай бұрын

@@motoroids okay

Theres a reason why bigger Triumph Scramblers are nowhere as successful in sales globally when compared to Speeds!.. The Scramblers are neither great handlers nor great offroaders..

@motoroids

10 ай бұрын

True

@random.random

9 ай бұрын

Scramblers are not meant to ride aggressive on corners nor do serious offroads. They are used to travel on rough roads fast.

Sir I am a big fan of your review but aap pahle English ke sath hindi m review dalte the, iss bike ka apka hindi m review nahi mil raha hai. Please Hindi m review band na kare.

@motoroids

7 ай бұрын

On Motoroids we do only English reviews now

Shumi😂

@motoroids

10 ай бұрын

What's the joke?

You ruined the bike review. This is more of an off-road bike and less of a road bike. That's why it carries the required equipment. But you are comparing it with Speed 400 as if they both are the same category bikes. Very poor analysis.. U should have been the person who appreciates both the bikes the way they are equipped for 2 different purposes but u failed..

@motoroids

10 ай бұрын

This is NOT an off road bike. It can do a bit of off roading

@vilaskulkarni3147

10 ай бұрын

I agree with you, the audience! I fail to understand the dominant review towards speed 400 even while testing this bike!! How can you test the bike objectively if you are carrying biased hangover from the beginning?? This is an all-purpose, allrounder bike and not a street or aggressive bike. It's not meant to be so. You know that street 400 can't go for even slight offroading because it's not built or designed for it. This bike holds the middle path and covers large parts of requirements from two divergent spectrums of bikes. I won't compare it with Himalayan 452 because the aim, the purpose of bikes is different. This bike should be opted for by those who are looking for an allrounder bike with fairly good stability, performance, and good build quality. That's it. You know why the breaks in this bike are progressively applied because they also cover offroading aspects of the travel. Sharp breaking on offroad patches may lead to sudden accidents. I really despised your oft repeated c9mment that "it's not as sharp or as confidence giving bike on corners" because it's not meant for that. I won't even look at street 400 because I am not looking for a street bike, but I can make a choice between Srcram 400x and Himalayan 452 because I am looking for touring aspects in the bike. I have been l9ng touring on bikes for more than 3 decades, starting with Yezdi 250 of 1974 make and the last bike with me being Himalayan 411 of 2018 make. I have not come across such an analysis with a preconceived mindset that wants everything like street 400😳🫤🤨 Please take the review objectively, taking into account the aim of the manufacturer about fitting that machine along some defined purpose and scope! I feel that 19"-17" tyre structure would strike a beautiful balance between agility, manoeuvrability, good ground clearance, and fairly good ability for soft offroading. It serves multiple purposes for the rider.

@toufiqahmedshaikh

10 ай бұрын

Very true! I was wondering the whole video why speed is being mentioned so many times.