Tour the Crab Nebula

Ғылым және технология

This video tours the Crab Nebula, a supernova remnant that lies 6,500 light-years away in the constellation Taurus. Despite this distance from Earth, the Crab Nebula is a relatively close example of what remains after the explosive death of a massive star.
NASA’s James Webb Space Telescope captures in unprecedented detail the various components that comprise the Crab, including the expanding cloud of hot gas, cavernous filaments of dust, and synchrotron emission. The synchrotron emission is the result of the nebula’s pulsar: a rapidly rotating neutron star that is located in the center.
The wind produced by the pulsar shapes the Crab Nebula’s form and pushes fast-moving particles along the magnetic field, forming thin ribbons that flow throughout the nebula’s interior. Toward the nebula’s edges are cavernous filaments of dust and hot gas-now-fractured material that was and continues to be ejected at high speeds. Zooming out reveals the nebula’s unique structure, including areas where the synchrotron emission seems to be pinched.
Webb’s sensitivity, along with the rich data collected by other telescopes, is helping astronomers study this complex and changing scene. This information will lead to an improved understanding of the Crab Nebula’s mysterious origins as well as broaden knowledge about the lives and deaths of stars.
Credits:
Science: Tea Temim (Princeton University)
Image: NASA, ESA, CSA, STScI
Video: Danielle Kirshenblat (STScI)

Пікірлер: 107

  • @subliminalvibes
    @subliminalvibes6 ай бұрын

    I hope you kids are being taught just how large this thing is. 6,500 light-years away, and it's 11 light-years wide! One light-year equals 5,878,625,370,000 miles. 👍😎🇦🇺

  • @tdw5933

    @tdw5933

    6 ай бұрын

    Our closet star four light years away?

  • @subliminalvibes

    @subliminalvibes

    6 ай бұрын

    @@tdw5933 Correct! If you were to travel to Proxima Centauri and back to earth, and back to that star again... that's about the same distance as the width of the crab nebula in that picture.

  • @SineEyed

    @SineEyed

    6 ай бұрын

    @@subliminalvibes even just 4 LY is _really_ far away; if we scale it down so that the sun has the same diameter as a quarter (25¢), Proxima Centauri would be 454 miles away.. 😮

  • @subliminalvibes

    @subliminalvibes

    6 ай бұрын

    @@SineEyed I love facts like that! 👍👍😎

  • @dr.chrisstar3527

    @dr.chrisstar3527

    4 ай бұрын

    I know right! Lol I just calculated 6x65

  • @goldgamercommenting2990
    @goldgamercommenting29906 ай бұрын

    It’s amazing that we spotted the neutron star like we never seen it before. This might be the first time we had a picture of a neutron star in visible light

  • @kalsizzle
    @kalsizzle6 ай бұрын

    so cool to see a neutron star like this

  • @Tsunami_Japan_

    @Tsunami_Japan_

    5 ай бұрын

    Turn off the sound and take then a look at the picture. What do You see?

  • @tullyfisher
    @tullyfisher6 ай бұрын

    Beautiful!

  • @TristanVash38
    @TristanVash386 ай бұрын

    Thank you for bringing out more content; keep the flow coming!

  • @rebishaz
    @rebishaz6 ай бұрын

    Please post more! this is amazing

  • @0thers1d3
    @0thers1d36 ай бұрын

    SO RAD!!! Words literally can explain how amazing this is.

  • @chrisg9602
    @chrisg96026 ай бұрын

    So awesome, the earth is just a rock sitting in space .

  • @sideshow8o872
    @sideshow8o8726 ай бұрын

    Amazing everything you guys are doing! Keep it up. Would love to see a nice long JWST video we can put on to get the constant fix of everything amazing!!

  • @jarvis4271
    @jarvis42715 ай бұрын

    Simply astonishing.

  • @secrets5ofwealth
    @secrets5ofwealth6 ай бұрын

    *Thank you. It's wonderful*

  • @lindameyer6397
    @lindameyer63976 ай бұрын

    Incredible

  • @theaudioeng
    @theaudioeng6 ай бұрын

    Gorgeous, super detailed 🙌🙏

  • @Tsunami_Japan_

    @Tsunami_Japan_

    5 ай бұрын

    It is computer generated. Telecopes don't take pictures. They receive radio waves.

  • @garethstevens4419
    @garethstevens44196 ай бұрын

    Nice!

  • @lucanava8743
    @lucanava87436 ай бұрын

    NO WORDS.... WOOWW... UNBELIEVABLE... AMAZING... ECC.....

  • @zanehuseth8621
    @zanehuseth86213 ай бұрын

    Fun fact, humans watched this baby get made. 1054AD, mentioned by the Chinese chronicles as a "guest" star that could be seen during the day time for at least a month.

  • @makeaguitarnoise
    @makeaguitarnoise6 ай бұрын

    I'll have to take your word for it

  • @lasarith2
    @lasarith26 ай бұрын

    Have you guy’s pointed it at the great attractor yet 🤔

  • @sherifahmed2055
    @sherifahmed20556 ай бұрын

    It just mind blowing , !

  • @b0zz1380y
    @b0zz1380y6 ай бұрын

    I’d love to know the distance from one end to the other just to try to imagine the scale of something like that

  • @Theoldman27

    @Theoldman27

    6 ай бұрын

    It's 11 light years wide. And for better reference our solar system is .00127 light years wide. So the nebula is far larger than the mind can comprehend.

  • @abundantYOUniverse

    @abundantYOUniverse

    6 ай бұрын

    Just picture my ex wife and you got it.

  • @quantumblauthor7300

    @quantumblauthor7300

    6 ай бұрын

    ​​@@abundantYOUniverse"Ex partner bad" _[laugh track]_

  • @subliminalvibes

    @subliminalvibes

    6 ай бұрын

    Google 'crab nebula size' and it'll tell you it's 11 light years wide.

  • @b0zz1380y

    @b0zz1380y

    6 ай бұрын

    Metaball studios needs to do something about this

  • @Arvence
    @Arvence6 ай бұрын

    This is beautiful! To see what we may have never been able to see in a Billion lifetimes. What could happen to us if a supernova takes place near our solar system?

  • @FaffyWaffles
    @FaffyWaffles6 ай бұрын

    Wow!

  • @jamesdelcol3701
    @jamesdelcol37014 ай бұрын

    But the Neutron Star doesn't have the mass to keep it all organized. So, it's a little out of control but some dense objects can whirl around a lot of material by generating such force. So interesting.

  • @L06907
    @L069076 ай бұрын

    It's nuts to see the amount of galaxies that are clearly displayed even farther from this image.

  • @peter.g6
    @peter.g63 ай бұрын

    Great video, but if I could suggest, make it a little slower next time, this felt like there was a time limit for the script to be fully read.

  • @soleiltounsi6754
    @soleiltounsi67546 ай бұрын

    One of the secrets of our huge universe ... wow 🌌

  • @cadror26
    @cadror266 ай бұрын

    For all it's improvements over the Hubble, being so close to Earth makes it a monocle. Just imagine what it would show us if it were in Lunar orbit.

  • @tdome3000
    @tdome30003 ай бұрын

    Nice background music #me

  • @KartikPatel-nt4ff
    @KartikPatel-nt4ff6 ай бұрын

    😅😅😮😅😅😅😅😅😊well information good show 😅

  • @dreamerofthorns
    @dreamerofthorns6 ай бұрын

    It's time for crab 🦀

  • @drmaheshchauhan
    @drmaheshchauhan6 ай бұрын

    How many Solar masses was the parent star?

  • @bobbymckenzie3202
    @bobbymckenzie32025 ай бұрын

    You can see the spinning in the clouds!! I can't wait for the ELT to be completed in 2028

  • @Somethinghumble
    @Somethinghumble3 ай бұрын

    This is how my wife describes me passing gas. BOOOOOOOOOOM

  • @tabby73
    @tabby736 ай бұрын

    I want to know what happens to all the "stuff" that it is ejecting (or did eject) . Does it get absorbed by other stars, black holes, planets?

  • @astromatz

    @astromatz

    6 ай бұрын

    The material is the basic ingredient for new stars and planets. The carbon in our cells was created in stars. The gold in our jewelry was created in such explosions. That's something impressive when you think about it, isn't it? ;-)

  • @bazpearce9993

    @bazpearce9993

    6 ай бұрын

    Eventually it will be mixed into the interstellar medium, In the future new stars may form.

  • @designsinorbit
    @designsinorbit5 ай бұрын

    How come no one discusses the exposure time involved with these photos? I think most people believe these objects actually are this bright. In reality, if we were to be in a space ship right up on this thing, we might not see it at all.

  • @nymuseum1601
    @nymuseum16016 ай бұрын

    Wonderful images. Pity the narration is submerged by the electronic pounding.

  • @tenborck
    @tenborck6 ай бұрын

    Please do compare things with our solar system. - My guess is that someone living in there wouldn't know that it is a nebula because of the size.

  • @RASmith-gt9mm
    @RASmith-gt9mm6 ай бұрын

    It's been said there are two fields of astronomy, the Crab Nebula, and everything else.

  • @ayandey137
    @ayandey1376 ай бұрын

    We want more guys!

  • @mememeandme

    @mememeandme

    6 ай бұрын

    I want more girls.

  • @valdeliceamori.2796
    @valdeliceamori.27965 ай бұрын

    How come JWST hasn't found Nibiru the other planet in our solar system yet?❤

  • @LoveToyotaRAV4
    @LoveToyotaRAV44 ай бұрын

    I was just taught about the JWST

  • @metaparcel
    @metaparcel6 ай бұрын

    Bet there are some mean sushi joints in that quadrant.

  • @May-sj8jv
    @May-sj8jv5 ай бұрын

    So, "Join the apes" might mean the end of the story...

  • @iberetanaruribeiros924
    @iberetanaruribeiros9246 ай бұрын

    Show

  • @sekelele
    @sekelele6 ай бұрын

    # uhg, uhg.. 😂 ok.

  • @sofiapaz3052
    @sofiapaz30526 ай бұрын

    Bro imagine u die and people call ur corpse crab

  • @cameroncooper2264
    @cameroncooper22646 ай бұрын

    Please Please PLEASE post more images and videos because once every 3 or 4 months is SOOO frustrating. And it does a disservice to the channel and it's fleeting viewers. Thank you anyway, but you can do better.

  • @mr.nobody6977
    @mr.nobody69776 ай бұрын

    Just a theory.😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 There are actually no color images. It's only for visionary awesomeness. In reality, it's just dark space with galaxies.

  • @miruxa.
    @miruxa.6 ай бұрын

    ketam

  • @Dysolus
    @Dysolus5 ай бұрын

    And??? Thats it? Pictures of gas and particles in space...sigh, disappointung.

  • @alexeyeryomin2962
    @alexeyeryomin29624 ай бұрын

    Most men's games are associated with "hitting the target" (football, hockey, billiards, basketball, etc.). It seems that there is something with innate instincts, and maybe sexual - purposefulness is attracted by emptiness (a gate, a hole). And here there is such a huge void (the Universe), and even with a lot of black holes... It looks like astrophysics has a great future!... Well, about the growth of the "intellectual potency" from man to humanity - see from the DrSci: "Biophysics of Evolution of Intellectual Systems" // Biophysics, 2022, Vol. 67, No. 2, pp. 320-326.

  • @flowersofthefield340
    @flowersofthefield3406 ай бұрын

    God's "Massive" Beautiful Universe ..... 😍 🤩 ✅️

  • @LooDyKsa

    @LooDyKsa

    6 ай бұрын

    Allah’s universe ❤

  • @quantumblauthor7300

    @quantumblauthor7300

    6 ай бұрын

    Why did you put "massive" in quotation marks? Normally that's an indicator of sarcasm, which I don't think you meant

  • @charlesbrightman4237
    @charlesbrightman42376 ай бұрын

    IN THE INTEREST OF FINDING THE THEORY OF EVERYTHING: SOME THINGS MODERN SCIENCE DOES NOT APPARENTLY KNOW: Consider the following: a. Numbers: Modern science does not even know how numbers and certain mathematical constants exist for math to do what math does. (And nobody as of yet has been able to show me how numbers and certain mathematical constants can come from the Standard Model Of Particle Physics). b. Space: Modern science does not even know what 'space' actually is nor how it could actually warp and expand. c. Time: Modern science does not even know what 'time' actually is nor how it could actually warp and vary. d. Gravity: Modern science does not even know what 'gravity' actually is nor how gravity actually does what it appears to do. And for those who claim that 'gravity' is matter warping the fabric of spacetime, see 'b' and 'c' above. e. Speed of Light: 'Speed', distance divided by time, distance being two points in space with space between those two points. But yet, here again, modern science does not even know what space and time actually are that makes up 'speed' and they also claim that space can warp and expand and time can warp and vary, so how could they truly know even what the speed of light actually is that they utilize in many of the formulas? Speed of light should also warp, expand and vary depending upon what space and time it was in. And if the speed of light can warp, expand and vary in space and time, how then do far away astronomical observations actually work that are based upon light and the speed of light that could warp, expand and vary in actual reality? f. Photons: A photon swirls with the 'e' and 'm' energy fields 90 degrees to each other. A photon is also considered massless. What keeps the 'e' and 'm' energy fields together across the vast universe? And why doesn't the momentum of the 'e' and 'm' energy fields as they swirl about not fling them away from the central area of the photon? And electricity is electricity and magnetism is magnetism varying possibly only in energy modality, energy density and energy frequency. Why doesn't the 'e' and 'm' of other photons and of matter basically tear apart a photon going across the vast universe? Also, 'if' a photon actually red shifts, where does the red shifted energy go and why does the photon red shift? And for those who claim space expanding causes a photon to red shift, see 'b' above. Why does radio 'em' (large 'em' waves) have low energy and gamma 'em' (small 'em' waves) have high energy? And for those who say E = hf; see also 'b' and 'c' above. (f = frequency, cycles per second. But modern science claims space can warp and expand and time can warp and vary. If 'space' warps and expands and/or 'time' warps and varies, what does that do to 'E'? And why doesn't 'E' keep space from expanding and time from varying?). g. Energy: Modern science claims that energy cannot be created nor destroyed, it's one of the foundations of physics. Hence, energy is either truly a finite amount and eternally existent, or modern science is wrong. First Law Of Thermodynamics: "Energy can neither be created nor destroyed." How exactly is 'energy' eternally existent? h. Existence and Non-Existence side by side throughout all of eternity. How?

  • @StefanCreates

    @StefanCreates

    6 ай бұрын

    Alright, I'll consider it.

  • @EricaJoy4444

    @EricaJoy4444

    6 ай бұрын

    I bet it would be really cool to smoke pot with you while lying on some remote mountain top staring at the night sky.

  • @charlesbrightman4237

    @charlesbrightman4237

    6 ай бұрын

    @@EricaJoy4444 Sure, but does the mountain actually exist? Do 'I' even actually exist? WHO AND/OR WHAT AM I? DO 'I' EVEN EXIST? Consider the following: a. I am a human as defined by humans. b. I am an energy based quarkelectronian as modern science claims that all matter is made up of quarks, electrons and interacting energy and I am made up of matter and interacting energy. c. I am a being of 'light', 'if' my current theory of everything is correct whereby the 'gem' photon is the energy unit of this universe that makes up everything in this universe, including space, time and numbers. (Currently dependent upon the results of my gravity test). d. "I" do not even actually exist but eternally existent space time exists as me, currently in the forms as above. * I exist and yet "I" simultaneously do not exist, dependent upon perspective. But yet, do "I" not truly exist in absolute truth reality as only eternally existent space time exists as all things in absolute truth reality? * "I" can mentally change between perspectives thereby experiencing existence from those various perspectives. "My" mind continues to expand, but is it truly 'my' mind that is expanding or is it eternally existent space time's mind that is expanding? In absolute truth reality, it would seem to be the later. * 'To Be or Not To Be'. I am both, 'I Am and I Am Not.' But I Am Not it appears more than I Am. * Consider also: If asked the general question, 'What do you know?'. My current answer would be, 'Not much compared to all that can be known.' (I Am Not, More than I Am). It's humbling. * Is it truly any wonder that the flow of energy in the universe affects species? We are the universe experiencing itself. * Question: If 'I' never actually existed in the first place, how could 'I' ever die? * Added Note: Now, 'assuming' the above is correct, that 'I' do not even actually exist but that eternally existent energy exists as 'me', and that 'my' consciousness, memories and thoughts are actually the universe acting through the form of 'me': a. I have yet to acquire any 'new' knowledge via this supposed connection that cannot be explained by 'normal' means. (In other words, besides things I learned or intuited). Even my theory of everything and other ideas are due to study and critical thinking. Nor can I magically fluently speak a language that I have not already learned. (In other words, no magical connection with the 'universal consciousness' at this time can be noted). b. I have yet to be able to manipulate reality with my mind alone, my physical body is necessary to manipulate reality. c. While I can imagine being elsewhere in this universe, it does not appear that I can actually take just my mind actually there. (My mind is where my body is). d. Doesn't mean I will stop trying, just have not noticed the above as occurring as of yet.

  • @charlesbrightman4237

    @charlesbrightman4237

    6 ай бұрын

    @@EricaJoy4444 As far as staring at the night sky: THE UNIVERSAL SHELL: Existence and non-existence, side by side for all of eternity: "IF" my Theory Of Everything is really true, (that what is called 'gravity' is a modality that is a part of the currently recognized 'em' photon, 'gravity' acting 90 degrees to the 'em' modalities, which of course act 90 degrees to each other, 'gravity' actually causing the sine wave pattern of 'em'), AND "IF" my view of space and time are correct, ('space' being energy itself [which is the 'gem' photon], 'time' being the flow of energy), then I could see where it might be possible that the inner spherical shell of the universe could possibly be made up of the 'gravity' modality of the 'gem' photon which is 90 degrees to the electrical modality of the 'gem' photon, which are both 90 degrees to the magnetic modality of the 'gem' photon, the magnetic modality existing both inside of and outside of the inner shell, the complete 'gem' photon interactions making up the entire spherical shell of all of existence itself. And then of course, non-existence would exist beyond existence. So, existence and non-existence might possibly exist side by side for all of eternity. It all depends upon whether the gravity test for my TOE is really true or not and whether my view of space time is correct or not, and whether the universal spherical shell exists as I believe it might or not. But 'if' true, and as no photons (currently 'em', 'gem' in my view) would be absorbed nor reflected by the spherical universal shell, then when we look at the blackness in the night sky that is beyond the light of the stars and galaxies, we might actually be perceiving in part the limits of existence and the universal shell of existence itself, with non-existence beyond. I am inside of a vast eternally existent universe, filled with everything in existence, and yet, somehow, I feel so alone. An existent universe unto itself alone with nothingness beyond.

  • @EricaJoy4444

    @EricaJoy4444

    6 ай бұрын

    Ohhhh, Wowwww Mannnnn. Hey, I'm seeing traaaiiils @@charlesbrightman4237

  • @wormsperm6576
    @wormsperm65766 ай бұрын

    This is NASA for you. Billions of dollars and we get less than a 2 min video.

  • @tdw5933

    @tdw5933

    6 ай бұрын

    Easy now, has Nova done a piece on it? Lots of info there.

  • @thelostone6981

    @thelostone6981

    6 ай бұрын

    I’m glad NASA gets all that money and I wish they had more to do more science. Plus there’s so much more coming from the JWST and other NASA projects than just a 2 minute video…but I have a feeling that is all lost on you.

  • @wormsperm6576

    @wormsperm6576

    6 ай бұрын

    @@thelostone6981 ah you want to make it personal I see. Let me guess you are a trump fan who welcomes open information and common sense. But I think.... With your name you shouldn't be throwing stones.

  • @wormsperm6576

    @wormsperm6576

    6 ай бұрын

    Did you say nova? Not NASA? Huh my money should go to nova instead. Imagine what they could show us with the trillions we spent so far.

  • @TristanVash38

    @TristanVash38

    6 ай бұрын

    @@wormsperm6576please calm down.

  • @yusufsari7277
    @yusufsari72776 ай бұрын

    Hello, anyone who is interested in space, please leave a like.

  • @quantumblauthor7300

    @quantumblauthor7300

    6 ай бұрын

    __

  • @Tsunami_Japan_
    @Tsunami_Japan_5 ай бұрын

    CRAP!

  • @jessicawinslet684
    @jessicawinslet6846 ай бұрын

    This is the best humans can currently come up with??? I lost faith in humans. This telescope is a huge disappointment. It has shown nothing new that it's 1990s predecessor didn't already see.

  • @arkaholicn1456
    @arkaholicn14566 ай бұрын

    I want my fucking tax dollars back. This helps me 0 percent in my daily life.

  • @parva777
    @parva7776 ай бұрын

    So frustrating ! You could have made a 3 days talk about this incredible deep sky object... You only speak about it for less then 2 minutes ! Why ?

  • @snappycattimesten
    @snappycattimesten6 ай бұрын

    Reminder: these are false color images. No shame in putting that in the video.

Келесі